1
|
Sharpe L, Richmond B, Todd J, Dudeney J, Dear BF, Szabo M, Sesel AL, Forrester M, Menzies RE. A cross-sectional study of existential concerns and fear of progression in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Psychosom Res 2023; 175:111514. [PMID: 37883892 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have higher levels of fear of disease progression (FOP) than cancer survivors. In cancer, FOP is inextricably linked with existential concerns. However, this has not been investigated in people with RA. METHODS We recruited 165 people with RA (96%F) who volunteered for a treatment trial of psychological intervention. Participants completed the Existential Concerns Questionnaire (ECQ) and questionnaires measuring constructs associated with FOP in cancer. We created groups of people with RA, with and without clinically significant levels of FOP (clinical and control groups) and compared their existential concerns. We hypothesized that existential concerns would add to the variance in FOP over and above pain, psychopathology, and disability. RESULTS Nearly two-thirds of people with RA scored in the clinical range for FOP. The clinical group had higher levels of all existential concerns than the control group. When subscales of the ECQ were entered into a multiple regression with FOP as the dependent variable, death anxiety, meaninglessness and guilt domains accounted for significant variance in FOP. Moreover, when added to a regression equation controlling all other variables, existential concerns continued to account for unique variance in FOP (t = 2.712, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Existential concerns were strongly associated with FOP. While this cross-sectional study cannot determine whether existential concerns underlie FOP in RA, these results show robust relationships that warrant future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Sharpe
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - Bethany Richmond
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Jemma Todd
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Joanne Dudeney
- The eCentreClinic, School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia
| | - Blake F Dear
- The eCentreClinic, School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia
| | - Marianna Szabo
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Amy-Lee Sesel
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Madeline Forrester
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachel E Menzies
- The School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mardani A, Farahani MA, Khachian A, Vaismoradi M. Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Coping Strategies among Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6720-6733. [PMID: 37504353 PMCID: PMC10378434 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), as a commonly reported problem among prostate cancer survivors, has not been fully understood. This study aimed to explore the experience of FCR and relevant coping strategies among Iranian prostate cancer survivors. METHODS Qualitative research was conducted on 13 men who completed treatments for prostate cancer in the last 24 months. The participants were selected through purposeful sampling, and in-depth semi-structured interviews were used for data collection. Conventional content analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS Data analysis led to the emergence of three themes. "Living with insecurity" describes the participants' experiences regarding what triggers FCR with two categories, including "fear of incomplete cure" and "fear of cancer return." In addition, "struggling to cope" with two categories, including "psychological strategies" and "spiritual coping," presents coping strategies used by the participants for reducing FCR. Furthermore, "trying to prevent cancer recurrence" with two categories, "seeking health" and "lifestyle modification," indicates coping strategies used by the participants to prevent cancer recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare providers need to consider the cultural characteristics of prostate cancer survivors when assessing their FCR, encourage them to disclose their concerns and fears, and provide tailored interventions in order to reduce FCR among them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Mardani
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1449614535, Iran
| | - Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1449614535, Iran
| | - Alice Khachian
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1449614535, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway
- Faculty of Science and Health, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teunissen FR, Hehakaya C, Meijer RP, van Melick HHE, Verkooijen HM, van der Voort van Zyp JRN. Patient preferences for treatment modalities for localised prostate cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2022; 4:214-222. [PMID: 36816141 PMCID: PMC9931535 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess the patient preferences and utility scores for the different conventional and innovative treatment modalities for localised prostate cancer (PCa). Subjects and Methods Patients treated for localised PCa and healthy volunteers were invited to fill out a treatment-outcome scenario questionnaire. Participants ranked six different treatments for localised PCa from most to least favourable, prior to information. In a next step, treatment procedures, toxicity, risk of biochemical recurrence and follow-up regimen were comprehensibly described for each of the six treatments (i.e. treatment-outcome scenarios), after which patients re-ranked the six treatments. Additionally, participants gave a visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) score for each scenario. Differences between utility scores were tested by Friedman tests with post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results Eighty patients and twenty-nine healthy volunteers were included in the study. Before receiving treatment-outcome scenario information, participants ranked magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy most often as their first choice (35%). After treatment information was received, active surveillance was most often ranked as the first choice (41%). Utility scores were significantly different between the six treatment-outcome scenarios, and active surveillance, non- and minimal-invasive treatments received higher scores. Conclusions Active surveillance and non-invasive treatment for localised PCa were the most preferred options by PCa patients and healthy volunteers and received among the highest utility scores. Treatment preferences change after treatment information is received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik R. Teunissen
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Charisma Hehakaya
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands,Imaging and Oncology DivisionUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Richard P. Meijer
- Department of Oncological UrologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Imaging and Oncology DivisionUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands,Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Joyce DD, Wallis CJD, Huang LC, Hoffman KE, Zhao Z, Koyama T, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, Cooperberg MR, Hashibe M, O’Neil BB, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Penson DF, Barocas DA. The Association Between Financial Toxicity and Treatment Regret in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:6762868. [PMID: 36255249 PMCID: PMC9731205 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity is emerging as an important patient-centered outcome and is understudied in prostate cancer patients. We sought to understand the association between financial burden and treatment regret in men with localized prostate cancer to better evaluate the role of financial discussions in patient counseling. METHODS Utilizing the Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation dataset, we identified all men accrued between 2011 and 2012 who underwent surgery, radiation, or active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. Financial burden and treatment regret were assessed at 3- and 5-year follow-up. The association between financial burden and regret was assessed using multivariable longitudinal logistic regression controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, treatment, functional outcomes, and patient expectations. RESULTS Of the 2924 eligible patients, regret and financial burden assessments for 3- and/or 5-year follow-up were available for 81% (n = 2359). After adjustment for relevant covariates, financial burden from "finances in general" was associated with treatment regret at 3 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33 to 4.57; P = .004); however, this association was no longer statistically significant at 5-year follow-up (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.56 to 2.54; P = .7). CONCLUSIONS In this population-based sample of men with localized prostate cancer, we observed associations between financial burden and treatment regret. Our findings suggest indirect treatment costs, especially during the first 3 years after diagnosis, may impact patients more profoundly than direct costs and are important for inclusion in shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Joyce
- Correspondence to: Daniel D. Joyce, MD, Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA (e-mail: )
| | | | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Lisa E Paddock
- Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Mia Hashibe
- Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brock B O’Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sherrie H Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Sheldon Greenfield
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ironson G, Hylton E, Verhagen R. A New Attitude Towards Treatment Measure Predicts Survival Over 17 Years. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:2351-2357. [PMID: 35296979 PMCID: PMC9360262 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07245-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients diagnosed with chronic illness, attitude towards treatment may play an important role in health and survival. For example, negative attitudes towards treatment have been related to poorer adherence to treatment recommendations and prescribed medication across a range of chronic illnesses. In addition, prior research has shown that attitude towards treatment assessed through a psychiatric interview predicted survival at 1 year after bone marrow transplantation with great accuracy (> 90%). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between a self-report attitude to a treatment measure that operationalized a psychiatric interview, and survival over 17 years in a sample of people living with HIV (PLWH). PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN Participants (N = 177) who were in the mid-range of HIV illness at baseline (CD4s 150 to 500, no prior AIDS-defining clinical symptom) were administered the Montreal-Miami Attitude to Treatment (MMAT-20/HIV) scale and followed longitudinally to determine survival at 17 years. MEASURES The Montreal-Miami Attitude to Treatment (MMAT-20/HIV) scale is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to survey multiple factors that contribute to an overall psychological construct of the treatment process. RESULTS The MMAT-20/HIV predicted survival over 17 years controlling for biomedical (baseline CD4, viral load, antiretroviral medications, age) and psychosocial (race, education, antiretroviral medications) variables. Those in the top half on the MMAT-20/HIV were almost twice as likely to survive than those in the lower half. Scores on the MMAT-20/HIV were significantly but modestly correlated with adherence (r = .20, p < .05), but adherence was not a mediator of the relationship between the MMAT-20/HIV and survival. CONCLUSIONS An individual's attitude towards the treatment process predicted survival, raising the possibility that optimal clinical management would include ways to probe these attitudes and intervene where possible. The ease of administering the MMAT-20 and adaptability to other illnesses could facilitate this endeavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Hylton
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Rachel Verhagen
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gu YF, Lin FP, Epstein RJ. How aging of the global population is changing oncology. Ecancermedicalscience 2022; 15:ed119. [PMID: 35211208 PMCID: PMC8816510 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.ed119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Population aging is causing a demographic redistribution with implications for the future of healthcare. How will this affect oncology? First, there will be an overall rise in cancer affecting older adults, even though age-specific cancer incidences continue to fall due to better prevention. Second, there will be a wider spectrum of health functionality in this expanding cohort of older adults, with differences between “physiologically older” and “physiologically younger” patients becoming more important for optimal treatment selection. Third, greater teamwork with supportive care, geriatric, mental health and rehabilitation experts will come to enrich oncologic decision-making by making it less formulaic than it is at present. Success in this transition to a more nuanced professional mindset will depend in part on the development of user-friendly computational tools that can integrate a complex mix of quantitative and qualitative inputs from evidence-based medicine, functional and cognitive assessments, and the personal priorities of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Fei Gu
- New Hope Cancer Center, United Family Hospitals, 9 Jiangtai W Rd, Chaoyang, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Frank P Lin
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney 2010, Australia.,NH&MRC Clinical Trials Centre, 92 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, Sydney 2050, Australia
| | - Richard J Epstein
- New Hope Cancer Center, United Family Hospitals, 9 Jiangtai W Rd, Chaoyang, Beijing 100015, China.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney 2010, Australia.,UNSW Clinical School, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney 2010, Australia.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4640-0195
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wallis CJD, Zhao Z, Huang LC, Penson DF, Koyama T, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Luckenbaugh AN, Klaassen Z, Conwill R, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, Cooperberg MR, Hashibe M, O’Neil BB, Hoffman KE, Barocas DA. Association of Treatment Modality, Functional Outcomes, and Baseline Characteristics With Treatment-Related Regret Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:50-59. [PMID: 34792527 PMCID: PMC8603232 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Treatment-related regret is an integrative, patient-centered measure that accounts for morbidity, oncologic outcomes, and anxiety associated with prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between treatment approach, functional outcomes, and patient expectations and treatment-related regret among patients with localized prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based, prospective cohort study used 5 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based registries in the Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation cohort. Participants included men with clinically localized prostate cancer from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012. Data were analyzed from August 2, 2020, to March 1, 2021. EXPOSURES Prostate cancer treatments included surgery, radiotherapy, and active surveillance. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient-reported treatment-related regret using validated metrics. Regression models were adjusted for demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment approach, and patient-reported functional outcomes. RESULTS Among the 2072 men included in the analysis (median age, 64 [IQR, 59-69] years), treatment-related regret at 5 years after diagnosis was reported in 183 patients (16%) undergoing surgery, 76 (11%) undergoing radiotherapy, and 20 (7%) undergoing active surveillance. Compared with active surveillance and adjusting for baseline differences, active treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of regret for those undergoing surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.40 [95% CI, 1.44-4.01]) but not radiotherapy (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.88-2.66]). When mediation by patient-reported functional outcomes was considered, treatment modality was not independently associated with regret. Sexual dysfunction, but not other patient-reported functional outcomes, was significantly associated with regret (aOR for change in sexual function from baseline, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.81]). Subjective patient-perceived treatment efficacy (aOR, 5.40 [95% CI, 2.15-13.56]) and adverse effects (aOR, 5.83 [95% CI, 3.97-8.58]), compared with patient expectations before treatment, were associated with treatment-related regret. Other patient characteristics at the time of treatment decision-making, including participatory decision-making tool scores (aOR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.92]), social support (aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]), and age (aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.97]), were significantly associated with regret. Results were comparable when assessing regret at 3 years rather than 5 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cohort study suggest that more than 1 in 10 patients with localized prostate cancer experience treatment-related regret. The rates of regret appear to differ between treatment approaches in a manner that is mediated by functional outcomes and patient expectations. Treatment preparedness that focuses on expectations and treatment toxicity and is delivered in the context of shared decision-making should be the subject of future research to examine whether it can reduce regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. D. Wallis
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David F. Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Amy N. Luckenbaugh
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Ralph Conwill
- Office of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Franklin, Tennessee
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans
| | - Lisa E. Paddock
- Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick
| | | | - Mia Hashibe
- Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | - Brock B. O’Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | - Karen E. Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stewart RJ, Humphris GM, Donaldson J, Cruickshank S. Does Cancer Type Influence the Impact of Recurrence? A Review of the Experience of Patients With Breast or Prostate Cancer Recurrence. Front Psychol 2021; 12:635660. [PMID: 34267696 PMCID: PMC8276075 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Patients will experience a plethora of issues when faced with a recurrence of their cancer. It is unclear if cancer type is a significant factor in how recurrence is experienced by an individual. The aim of the current review is to explore the evidence base and summarise the experiences of patients specifically with a recurrence of breast or prostate cancer (the most common for women and men, respectively) and then provide a comparison of these experiences. These experiences include the physical, psychological and psychosocial issues that arise at this time. Methods: A systematic search was conducted of studies published between January 1994 and April 2019. Due to the mix of research designs used previously in the literature, this review was conducted in an integrative manner; allowing for inclusion of diverse research designs. Results were synthesised narratively, with data categorised according to physical, psychological, and psychosocial indices of quality of life. The review protocol was registered in the international database of prospective systematic reviews in health and social care- (CRD42019137381). Results: Fifteen breast cancer and six prostate cancer articles were identified, each reporting one relevant study. Patients reported several negative issues at the time of a breast or prostate cancer recurrence. Similarities were found between cancer types, with physical problems such as fatigue, psychological issues including anxiety and depressive symptoms, and psychosocial concerns such as issues with healthcare professionals common in both cancers. Certain findings were inconsistent across studies, with some experiences differing between studies rather than due to cancer type. Conclusions: Differences in the experience of recurrent cancer appear to be more heavily influenced by individual factors, rather than cancer type. Findings are confounded by gender; and should be considered preliminary. Effects of recurrence should be studied in samples where cancer type and gender are not confounded. Concerns are raised about available study quality and differing outcome measures in this interpretation. Care and support of the individual at the time of a cancer recurrence is a key focus. Future research suggestions with implications for clinical practise are included. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019137381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross James Stewart
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jayne Donaldson
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| | - Susanne Cruickshank
- Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fear of Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Cross-sectional Study After Radical Prostatectomy or Active Surveillance. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 25:44-51. [PMID: 34337502 PMCID: PMC8317872 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a distressing consequence of cancer. Little is known about the prevalence of FoR in different treatment groups and factors associated with FoR among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors. Objective To investigate the prevalence of high FoR among PCa survivors after radical prostatectomy (RP) or under active surveillance (AS) and to explore clinical and psychological factors potentially associated with FoR. Design, setting, and participants This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 606 patients with PCa, treated with either RP (n = 442) or AS (n = 164) at two Norwegian regional hospitals. The 440 patients (73%) who gave consent to participate were invited in 2017 to complete a questionnaire measuring FoR, self-rated health, adverse effects, and psychological factors at a mean of 4.1 yr (standard deviation 1.7) after their treatment decision. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis FoR was measured using the Concerns About Recurrence Questionnaire, with high FoR defined as a sum score of =12 points (range 0–40). Using multivariable logistic regression analyses, factors associated with high FoR were identified. Results and limitations One-third of the participants had high FoR; scores were higher in the AS group and in the RP group with treatment failure. Younger age was significantly associated with high FoR in the AS group, while high prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, biochemical recurrence, positive surgical margin, higher fatigue, and a type D personality were significantly associated with high FoR in the RP group. Conclusions At 4 yr after a diagnosis of PCa, high FoR was common, especially among AS patients and among RP patients with treatment failure. Patient summary In this study, we examined fear that their disease will return or progress among prostate cancer survivors. We found that such fear was common, especially among young patients under active surveillance and among radical prostatectomy patients with treatment failure or with certain psychological features.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lebel S, Mutsaers B, Tomei C, Leclair CS, Jones G, Petricone-Westwood D, Rutkowski N, Ta V, Trudel G, Laflamme SZ, Lavigne AA, Dinkel A. Health anxiety and illness-related fears across diverse chronic illnesses: A systematic review on conceptualization, measurement, prevalence, course, and correlates. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234124. [PMID: 32716932 PMCID: PMC7384626 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic diseases commonly report fears of illness or symptoms recurring or worsening. These fears have been addressed from an illness-specific perspective (e.g., fear of cancer recurrence), a generic illness perspective (e.g., fear of progression), and a psychiatric perspective (DSM-5 illness anxiety disorder and somatic symptom disorder). The broader concept of health anxiety (HA) can also be applied to patients with a chronic disease. This review was conducted to investigate the conceptual, theoretical, measurement-overlap, and differences between these distinct perspectives. We also aimed to summarize prevalence, course, and correlates of these fears in different chronic illnesses. METHODS We used PsycINFO, PubMED, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PSYNDEX to conduct a systematic review of studies pertaining to these fears in chronic illness published from January 1996 to October 2017. A total of 401 articles were retained. RESULTS There were commonalities across different conceptualizations and diseases: a high prevalence of clinical levels of fears (>20%), a stable course over time, and a deleterious impact on quality of life. Reviewed studies used definitions, models, and measures that were illness-specific, with only a minority employing a psychiatric perspective, limiting cross-disease generalizability. There appears to be some applicability of DSM-5 disorders to the experience of fear of illness/symptoms in patients with a chronic illness. While conceptualizing HA on a continuum ranging from mild and transient to severe may be appropriate, there is a lack of agreement about when the level of fear becomes 'excessive.' The definitions, models, and measures of HA across chronic illnesses involve affective, cognitive, behavioral, and perceptual features. CONCLUSIONS The concept of HA may offer a unifying conceptual perspective on the fears of illness/symptoms worsening or returning commonly experienced by those with chronic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Lebel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Christina Tomei
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Georden Jones
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nicole Rutkowski
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Viviane Ta
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geneviève Trudel
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kessler TA. The Role of Cognitive Appraisal in Quality of Life Over Time in Patients With Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47:292-304. [PMID: 32301930 DOI: 10.1188/20.onf.292-304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To better understand how personal factors, contextual factors, and cognitive appraisals predict quality of life. SAMPLE & SETTING 81 patients with a new diagnosis of cancer were recruited from two oncologists' offices in the midwestern United States. METHODS & VARIABLES A longitudinal design was used to collect data at three time points. RESULTS Individuals identified a variety of primary appraisals at the same time and more consistently identified their cancer as a challenge rather than a harm/loss or a threat. The greatest variation in appraisals and quality of life occurred about six months after diagnosis. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that age and primary and secondary appraisals explained a significant amount of variance in quality of life at all three time points. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Interventions to improve quality of life for individuals newly diagnosed with cancer are needed and may be more helpful if they target cognitive appraisals. Nurses should assess what matters to the individual; it is important to evaluate how each person appraises a cancer diagnosis so providers can support coping and adjustment from diagnosis through individual treatment trajectories.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wilding S, Downing A, Selby P, Cross W, Wright P, Watson EK, Wagland R, Kind P, Donnelly DW, Hounsome L, Mottram R, Allen M, Kearney T, Butcher H, Gavin A, Glaser A. Decision regret in men living with and beyond nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the United Kingdom: A population-based patient-reported outcome study. Psychooncology 2020; 29:886-893. [PMID: 32065691 PMCID: PMC7317932 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective Clinical options for managing nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) vary. Each option has side effects associated with it, leading to difficulty in decision‐making. This study aimed to assess the relationship between patient involvement in treatment decision‐making and subsequent decision regret (DR), and quantify the impact of health‐related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes on DR. Methods Men living in the United Kingdom, 18 to 42 months after diagnosis of PCa, were identified from cancer registration data and sent a questionnaire. Measures included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite short form (EPIC‐26), EQ‐5D‐5L, and an item on involvement in treatment decision‐making. Multivariable ordinal regression was utilized, with DR categorized as none, mild, or moderate/severe regret. Results A total of 17 193 men with stage I‐III PCa completed the DRS: 36.6% reported no regret, 43.3% mild regret, and 20.0% moderate/severe regret. The odds of reporting DR were greater if men indicated their views were not taken into account odds ratio ([OR] = 6.42, 95% CI: 5.39‐7.64) or were involved “to some extent” in decision‐making (OR = 4.63, 95% CI: 4.27‐5.02), compared with men who were “definitely” involved. After adjustment, including for involvement, men reporting moderate/big problems with urinary, bowel, or sexual function were more likely to experience regret compared with men with no/small problems. Better HRQL scores were associated with lower levels of DR. Conclusions This large‐scale study demonstrates the benefit of patient involvement in treatment decision‐making for nonmetastatic PCa. However, men experiencing side effects and poorer HRQL report greater DR. Promoting engagement in clinical decision‐making represents good practice and may reduce the risk of subsequent regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wilding
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Selby
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - William Cross
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eila K Watson
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Kind
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David W Donnelly
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Luke Hounsome
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Mottram
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Majorie Allen
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Therese Kearney
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Hugh Butcher
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Adam Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lim E, Humphris G. The relationship between fears of cancer recurrence and patient age: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2020; 3:e1235. [PMID: 32671982 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most prevalent concerns and a common unmet need reported by cancer patients. Patient age is a demographic variable that has been linked to FCR, among others. Although it is recognised by researchers that age and FCR may be negatively correlated, the strength of this correlation has yet to be established. AIM The aims of this study were to (a) conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the overall association of patient age in years with FCR across studies from 2009 to February 2019 and (b) scrutinise for patterns of these effect sizes across studies. METHODS AND RESULTS Peer-reviewed papers were gathered from the literature via online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO). Systematic review guidelines including a quality assessment were applied to the 31 selected studies (pooled participant N size = 19 777). The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant negative association between age and FCR (ES = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.17, -0.07). Meta-regression revealed the association of patient age and FCR significantly reduced over the last decade. A significant effect (β = -0.17, P = 0.005) of breast cancer versus other cancers on this age by FCR association was also identified. CONCLUSION The reliable and readily accessible personal information of age of patient can be utilised as a weak indicator of FCR level especially in the breast cancer field, where the majority of studies were drawn. The suggestion that age and FCR association may be attenuated in recent years requires confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Lim
- Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Gerald Humphris
- Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.,Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Neris RR, Leite ACAB, Nascimento LC, García-Vivar C, Zago MMF. "What I was and what I am": A qualitative study of survivors' experience of urological cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2019; 44:101692. [PMID: 31751850 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most qualitative studies do not explore experience throughout the urologic cancer survival trajectory. Moreover, the evidence of the experience of cancer survivors that focuses on the contextual aspects of culture is scarce in oncology literature. This study aimed to analyze the survival experience of urological cancer from the perspective of men. METHOD This was a narrative research based on the concepts of culture derived from the interpretative medical anthropologic approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 male survivors of urological cancer at different survival seasons. Seven participants agreed to a second interview, which resulted in 17 interviews. The data were analyzed using a five-phase thematic analysis approach. The findings are presented as narrative syntheses. The standards for reporting qualitative research (SPQR) was used in this study. RESULTS Two narrative syntheses were constructed: "The journey of urological cancer: discovering oneself as a survivor" and "What I was and what I am today": the disruption on the body and life. The narrative synthesis shows that survivors undergo transitions of identity from being healthy men to wrecked men. The survivors tried to present themselves as normal men to keep their masculinity intact. However, the experience of survival constituted a process of liminality and biographical disruption. CONCLUSION The experience of surviving urological cancer has highlighted the physical, emotional, and social challenges experienced by these male survivors. It is recommended to oncology nurses that nursing care should be planned along survival seasons considering the survivors' individual and subjective experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhyquelle Rhibna Neris
- Public Health Nursing Graduate Program, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
| | - Ana Carolina Andrade Biaggi Leite
- Interunit Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo College of Nursing and the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing. Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Systematic review of interventions by non-mental health specialists for managing fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:4055-4067. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04979-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
16
|
Pillay B, Moon D, Meyer D, Crowe H, Mann S, Howard N, Wootten A, Frydenberg M. Exploring the impact of providing men with information about potential prostate cancer treatment options prior to receiving biopsy results. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:507-514. [PMID: 31065839 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04847-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is little research assessing the impact of providing men with information about prostate cancer (PCa) treatment options at the time of referral for a prostate biopsy. Study objectives were to determine whether receiving an information booklet about PCa treatment options prior to receiving biopsy results was acceptable to patients, and if receiving this information influenced levels of anxiety, depression, distress, and treatment decisional conflict. METHODS Between June 2016 and September 2017, a randomised block design was used to allocate patients from an Australian urology practice into the intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group were provided with written information about treatment options for localised PCa prior to their biopsy. Outcome measures including the Distress Thermometer, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Decisional Conflict Scale were completed pre-biopsy and 2-3 weeks post-biopsy. Ninety-eight patients referred for an initial prostate biopsy for an elevated PSA test or suspicious digital rectal exam participated in the study (response rate = 78%). RESULTS Multimodal repeated-measures analyses showed no significant differences between control and intervention groups in changes in distress, anxiety, or depression from pre- to post-biopsy, and in decisional conflict post-diagnosis (all p > .05). Thirty-five (87%) patients believed that the resource made it easier to understand subsequent explanation of treatment options, and 51 patients (98%) who received the intervention preferred to be given information at that time. CONCLUSIONS Providing patients with information about treatment options prior to biopsy did not impact on changes in psychological distress and decisional conflict post-biopsy. However, the majority of patients preferred to be given such information at this time point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brindha Pillay
- Epworth Prostate Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Psychosocial Oncology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
| | - Daniel Moon
- Epworth Centre for Robotic Surgery, Epsworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Denny Meyer
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Crowe
- Epworth Prostate Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Prostate Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Mann
- Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Howard
- Epworth Prostate Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Addie Wootten
- Epworth Prostate Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Prostate Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Institute of Specialty Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu LM, McGinty H, Amidi A, Bovbjerg K, Diefenbach MA. Longitudinal dyadic associations of fear of cancer recurrence and the impact of treatment in prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:708-714. [PMID: 30741082 PMCID: PMC6534441 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1563714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in patients and their spouses is associated with reduced quality of life, but little is known about longitudinal dyadic associations of FCR between them. This study examined (i) the trajectory of FCR from pre-treatment to 12 months later; (ii) dyadic associations of FCR over time; and (iii) whether cancer treatment type predicted later FCR among prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Methods: Sixty-nine patients and 71 spouses of patients with localized prostate cancer completed a FCR measure at baseline (pre-treatment), 6 months and 12 months later (post-treatment). A repeated measures linear mixed model was used to examine FCR trajectories. Actor-partner interdependence models (APIMs) were conducted on the 52 couples with complete data to examine actor and partner effects and treatment type on subsequent FCR. Results: Patients and spouses reported moderate FCR levels over time, though spouses' FCR was significantly higher than patients' FCR (p < .001). FCR declined significantly for both groups over time (p < .001). APIMs demonstrated significant actor effects in baseline to 6 month, and 6-12 month models. Surgery was significantly associated with lower spouse FCR at 6 months, and radiation with lower patient FCR at 12 months. Conclusions: This is the first study to have concurrently examined FCR longitudinally in prostate cancer patients and spouses. Patients' and spouses' FCR declined from pre- to post-treatment, with spouses experiencing greater FCR than patients over time. FCR in patients and spouses did not appear to impact one another over time. Treatment type impacted FCR in patients and spouses differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M. Wu
- 1. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 North St. Clair Street – 19 floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; phone: +1(312)503-7722; , 2. Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heather McGinty
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, College of Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2050 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH 43221, USA; phone: +1(614)688-7228;
| | - Ali Amidi
- Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University and Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Bartholins Allé 9, Build. 1340, Room 248, DK8000, Aarhus C, Denmark; phone: +45 8716-5305;
| | - Katrin Bovbjerg
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 North St. Clair Street – 19 floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; phone: +1(312)503-5915;
| | - Michael A. Diefenbach
- Department of Medicine and Urology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA; phone: +1(516)321-8001;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maguire R, Drummond FJ, Hanly P, Gavin A, Sharp L. Problems sleeping with prostate cancer: exploring possible risk factors for sleep disturbance in a population-based sample of survivors. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3365-3373. [PMID: 30627919 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4633-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of sleeping problems in prostate cancer survivors and to explore the role of predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating factors in this process. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, 3348 prostate cancer survivors between 2 and 18 years post diagnosis reported experiences of insomnia using the QLQC30, along with their sociodemographic characteristics, health status and treatment(s) received. The EQ5D-5L and QLQPR25 assessed survivors' overall and prostate cancer-specific health-related quality of life. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was constructed with three blocks: (1) predisposing (e.g. demographics at diagnosis), (2) precipitating (e.g. disease extent, treatment) and (3) perpetuating factors (e.g. side effects). RESULTS Nineteen percent of survivors reported significant problems sleeping. The final model accounted for 31% of the variance in insomnia scores (p < .001). In order of magnitude, associates of sleep disturbance were urinary symptoms (β = 0.22; p < .001), experiencing symptoms of depression/anxiety (β = 0.18; p < .001), hormone treatment-related symptoms (β = 0.12; p = .001), pain (β = 0.10; p < .001) and bowel symptoms (β = 0.06; p = .005). Having a lower education and more comorbidities at diagnosis also predicted sleep problems. CONCLUSION Results suggest that it is the ongoing adverse effects of prostate cancer and its treatment (e.g. urinary symptoms) that put survivors most at risk of sleep problems. Strong associations with symptoms of depression/anxiety were also observed. Findings highlight the need for health care practitioners to treat and manage adverse effects of prostate cancer treatment in order to mitigate sleep disturbance in survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Maguire
- Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| | | | - Paul Hanly
- National College of Ireland, Mayor Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | | | - Linda Sharp
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Haack M, Kofahl C, Kramer S, Seidel G, von dem Knesebeck O, Dierks ML. Participation in a prostate cancer support group and health literacy. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2473-2481. [PMID: 30092120 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To cope with prostate cancer (PC) and its consequences and to be certain about therapeutic alternatives, some patients seek mutual help in prostate cancer support groups (PCSGs), where they share information and find social support. Our study was intended to assess whether group participation is associated with health literacy (HL). METHODS We compared PCSG members (n = 441) with PC patients without support group experiences (n = 135) in a cross-sectional design. For this purpose, HL was operationalized through PC-specific knowledge, noncancer-specific knowledge about health care, guideline awareness, and skills needed to apply health information to meet own needs. Binary logistic regression models were calculated. Socio-demographic data and disease-related characteristics were used as control variables. RESULTS Knowledge about PC (OR, 2.2; CI, 1.3-3.7), the fact of having heard of guidelines (OR, 3.7; CI, 2.1-6.8) and having read one (OR, 5.1; CI, 2.8-9.4), and competencies regarding health service navigation (OR, 1.8; CI, 1.0-3.1) are associated with PCSG membership. No statistically significant associations could be found between PCSG membership and further skills questioned, as well as between membership and knowledge about noncancer-specific health care. CONCLUSION PCSG membership is associated with HL in some areas only. In particular, the groups seem to provide an important platform for information exchange in the field of PC. The potentially conflicting results on PC knowledge and the application skills may arise from the different forms of measurement-knowledge was tested; skills were self-assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Haack
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christopher Kofahl
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silke Kramer
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gabriele Seidel
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Olaf von dem Knesebeck
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Dierks
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|