Does stress increase risk of breast cancer? A 15-year prospective study

Humanistic Health Management and Cancer: Associations of Psychology, Nutrition, and Exercise with Cancer Progression and Pathogenesis

The incidence rate of cancer is increasing year by year due to the aging of the population, unhealthy living, and eating habits. At present, surgery and medication are still the main treatments for cancer, without paying attention to the impact of individual differences in health management on cancer. However, increasing evidence suggests that individual psychological status, dietary habits, and exercise frequency are closely related to the risk and prognosis of cancer. The reminder to humanity is that the medical concept of the unified treatment plan is insufficient in cancer treatment, and a personalized treatment plan may become a breakthrough point. On this basis, the concept of "Humanistic Health Management" (HHM) is proposed. This concept is a healthcare plan that focuses on self-health management, providing an accurate and comprehensive evaluation of individual lifestyle habits, psychology, and health status, and developing personalized and targeted comprehensive cancer prevention and treatment plans. This review will provide a detailed explanation of the relationship between psychological status, dietary, and exercise habits, and the regulatory mechanisms of cancer. Intended to emphasize the importance of HHM concept in cancer prevention and better prognostic efficacy, providing new ideas for the new generation of cancer treatment.

Chronic Stress Related to Cancer Incidence, including the Role of Metabolic Syndrome Components

Epidemiological results on the link between chronic stress and cancer initiation have been inconsistent. This study examined the relation between chronic biological stress, indicated as hair cortisol (HairF) and hair cortisone (HairE), and cancer incidence, adjusting for metabolic syndrome (MetS) components. We analyzed HairF and HairE samples from 6341 participants from the population-based cohort Lifelines in 2014. A linkage with the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga) provided the cancer incidence from 2015 to 2021. The association between dichotomized HairF and log-transformed HairE (LogHairE) and cancer incidence was estimated using Cox regression. MetS components were evaluated as confounders or moderators. Of the 2776 participants with known HairF levels and no cancer history, 238 developed cancer. The HairF level did not predict cancer incidence (HR: 0.993, 95%CI: 0.740-1.333). No confounders or moderators were identified. Among the 4699 participants with known HairE levels and no cancer history, 408 developed cancer. There was no association between LogHairE and cancer incidence (HR: 1.113, 95%CI: 0.738-1.678). When including age as a confounder and gender as a moderator, LogHairE was statistically significantly associated with cancer incidence (HR: 6.403, 95%CI: 1.110-36.92). In a population-based cohort, chronic biological stress, measured by HairE, was associated with cancer incidence, after controlling for age and gender.

Psychosocial stressors and breast cancer gene expression in the Black Women's Health Study

PURPOSE

Prior studies indicate that the physiologic response to stress can affect gene expression. We evaluated differential gene expression in breast cancers collected from Black women with high versus low exposure to psychosocial stressors.

METHODS

We analyzed tumor RNA sequencing data from 417 Black Women's Health Study breast cancer cases with data on early life trauma and neighborhood disadvantage. We conducted age-adjusted differential gene expression analyses and pathway analyses. We also evaluated Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity (CTRA) contrast scores, relative fractions of immune cell types, T cell exhaustion, and adrenergic signaling. Analyses were run separately for estrogen receptor positive (ER+; n = 299) and ER- (n = 118) cases.

RESULTS

Among ER+ cases, the top differentially expressed pathways by stress exposure were related to RNA and protein metabolism. Among ER- cases, they were related to developmental biology, signal transduction, metabolism, and the immune system. Targeted analyses indicated greater immune pathway enrichment with stress exposure for ER- cases, and possible relevance of adrenergic signaling for ER+ cases. CTRA contrast scores did not differ by stress exposure, but in analyses of the CTRA components, ER- breast cancer cases with high neighborhood disadvantage had higher pro-inflammatory gene expression (p = 0.039) and higher antibody gene expression (p = 0.006) compared to those with low neighborhood disadvantage.

CONCLUSION

There are multiple pathways through which psychosocial stress exposure may influence breast tumor biology. Given the present findings on inflammation and immune response in ER- tumors, further research to identify stress-induced changes in the etiology and progression of ER- breast cancer is warranted.

The cancer-immune dialogue in the context of stress

Although there is little direct evidence supporting that stress affects cancer incidence, it does influence the evolution, dissemination and therapeutic outcomes of neoplasia, as shown in human epidemiological analyses and mouse models. The experience of and response to physiological and psychological stressors can trigger neurological and endocrine alterations, which subsequently influence malignant (stem) cells, stromal cells and immune cells in the tumour microenvironment, as well as systemic factors in the tumour macroenvironment. Importantly, stress-induced neuroendocrine changes that can regulate immune responses have been gradually uncovered. Numerous stress-associated immunomodulatory molecules (SAIMs) can reshape natural or therapy-induced antitumour responses by engaging their corresponding receptors on immune cells. Moreover, stress can cause systemic or local metabolic reprogramming and change the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota which can indirectly modulate antitumour immunity. Here, we explore the complex circuitries that link stress to perturbations in the cancer-immune dialogue and their implications for therapeutic approaches to cancer.

Associations between experience of stressful life events and cancer prevalence in China: results from the China Kadoorie Biobank study

BACKGROUND

Studies examining the relationships of stressful life events and cancer yielded inconsistent findings, while relevant evidence in mainland China is scarce. The current study sought to determine whether experience of stressful life events was associated with cancer prevalence in Chinese population.

METHODS

We used cross-sectional data from the China Kadoorie Biobank study which that recruited 0.5 million Chinese adults aged 30 to 79 from 2004 to 2008. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer associated with stressful life events reported at baseline.

RESULTS

Among the 461,696 participants included in this analysis, 2,122 (0.46%) had self-reported cancer with the mean (SD) age was 57.12 (9.71) years. Compared to those without any stressful life event, participants who experienced 1 and 2 or more events had significantly higher odds of cancer, with the ORs of 1.80 (95% CI: 1.58-2.05) and 3.05 (2.18-4.28). For categories of work-, family-, and personal-related events, the OR of cancer was 1.48 (1.07-2.05), 2.06 (1.80-2.35), and 1.65 (1.17-2.33), respectively. Regarding the specific stressful life events, loss of income/living on debt, major conflict within family, death/major illness of other close family member, and major injury/traffic accident were significantly associated with increased odds of cancer, with the ORs of 2.64 (1.81-3.86), 1.73 (1.20-2.50), 2.36 (2.05-2.72), and 2.11 (1.43-3.13).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that experiences of cumulative and specific stressful life events were significantly associated with increased cancer prevalence in Chinese population.

Psychosocial stress and cancer risk: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

It is unclear which psychological factors (stressors, emotional correlates, and psychophysiological markers) induce cancer risk. This currently limits the potential for prevention strategies.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to bring forth evidence of stress as a determinant of cancer risk from a public health perspective, written for a broad public of practitioners and scientists.

METHODS

Based on a semisystematic literature search, the impact of different aspects/types of stress and the potential physiological and behavioral pathways are summarized, while highlighting further research, public health and clinical implications.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2020, 65 case-control or cohort studies have been identified. Apart from overall cancer ( N = 24), 12 cancer types have been associated with psychological stress with most for breast ( N = 21), colorectal ( N = 11) and lung/prostate/pancreas cancer ( N = 8 each). Although the evidence regarding the mechanisms is still scarce, cancer development in relation to stress might be due to interacting and combined effects of different stress(or) types, but such interaction has not really been tested yet. The path from stress towards cancer incidence consists of a biological pathway with endocrinology and immunology as well as stress-induced behavioral pathways, including smoking, alcoholism, sleep disruption, an unhealthy diet, and low physical activity together with the related phenomenon of obesity.

CONCLUSION

Not only the stress but also the stress-induced lifestyle should be targeted for cancer prevention and treatment. Future research should include a more diverse spectrum of cancer types (not only hormonal related like breast cancer) and of stress measures while also considering behavioral covariates.

Information needs on breast cancer genetic and non-genetic risk factors in relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant

OBJECTIVES

Comprehensive breast cancer (BC) risk models integrating effects of genetic (GRF) and non-genetic risk factors (NGRF) may refine BC prevention recommendations. We explored the perceived information received on BC risk factors, and related characteristics, in female relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant, undergoing BC risk assessment using the CanRisk© prediction tool.

METHODS

Of 200 consecutive cancer-free women approached after the initial genetic consultation, 161 (80.5%) filled in questionnaires on their perception of information received and wished further information on BC risk factors (e.g., being a carrier of a moderate risk altered gene, personal genetic profile, lifestyles). Multilevel multivariate linear models were performed accounting for the clinician who met the counselee and exploring the effect of counselees' socio-demographic, familial and psychological characteristics on the perceived extent of information received.

RESULTS

Perceived no/little information received and wish for further information were more frequent for NGRF (>50%) than for GRF, especially high-risk genes (<20%). Perceived amount of information received and desire for further information were inversely correlated (p=<0.0001). Higher education level related to lower perceived levels of information received on GRF. Younger counselees' age (β = 0.13, p = 0.02) and less frequent engagement coping (e.g., inclination to solicit information) (β = 0.24, p = 0.02) related to lower perceived information received about NGRF. Other assessed counselees' features were not found to be associated to GRF and NGRF information perception.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of counselees' perceived lack of information on BC risk factors indicates a need to enhance evidence-based information on BC NGRF especially.

The Role of Psychologic Stress in Cancer Initiation: Clinical Relevance and Potential Molecular Mechanisms

The hypothesis that the physiologic response to psychologic stress influences the initiation of cancer is highly controversial. The link between initiating stressors, the psychologic stress response, and disease is plausible, considering that the stress response is associated with defined physiologic outcomes and molecular mechanisms. In light of this, we review the clinical relevance of psychologic stress on the risk of cancer, and we propose potential molecular pathways that may link the stress response to early stages of malignant cell transformation.

The Role of Stress in Breast Cancer Incidence: Risk Factors, Interventions, and Directions for the Future

Stress is a common belief among breast cancer patients and the public to explain variation in breast cancer incidence. Epidemiological studies interrogating the relationship between stress and cancer have reported mixed results. The impact of the topic and the lack of consensus has sparked this review of the literature to investigate gaps in knowledge and identify areas of research. We first present a brief summary of the biopsychosocial model generally used to conduct research on stress. We then divide the overview of the literature into areas of research focus. These include the role of distressing life events in breast cancer incidence, the role of adverse childhood events in later breast cancer incidence, the importance of race and socioeconomic status (SES) as social determinants of breast cancer incidence, and the specific role of chronic stress in relation to breast cancer. For each topic, we discuss the potential of stress as a risk factor and possible intervention strategies that could reduce the effects of stress. We then identify further research questions to be probed to fill the gaps in knowledge. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions for stress research as it relates to breast cancer incidence.

Stress et cancer : mythes et réalités

Les théories profanes émises par les patients et certains ouvrages destinés au grand public alimentent l’idée que le stress psychologique peut influencer le risque de survenue de cancer. Les études consultées sur cette question semblent donner des résultats contradictoires. D’un côté, ces théories peuvent sembler étayées par les résultats d’études expérimentales portant sur les corrélats physiologiques du stress sur des voies neuro-immunoendocrinologiques (perturbations immunitaires, altération de l’axe hypothalamohypophyso- surrénalien), métaboliques et cellulaires (stress oxydatif, dégénérescence cellulaire) pouvant être impliquées dans la tumorigenèse. De l’autre, les études épidémiologiques prospectives fondées sur une méthodologie robuste ne trouvent généralement pas d’association entre exposition au stress et développement ultérieur d’un cancer. Par ailleurs, les méta-analyses suggèrent l’existence de biais de publication pouvant surestimer le poids des études « positives ». Quand bien même une association est retrouvée, le caractère observationnel des études épidémiologiques et donc la possibilité de facteurs de confusion empêchent d’établir un lien de causalité entre l’exposition au stress et un risque majoré de cancer. En ce qui concerne les mécanismes d’une éventuelle relation causale directe, il faut souligner la difficulté d’extrapoler à l’être humain des résultats obtenus chez d’autres animaux, et s’assurer de bien prendre en compte la présence de facteurs comportementaux confondants ou médiateurs comme une mauvaise hygiène de vie alimentaire, la consommation de tabac et d’alcool, les expositions professionnelles, etc. Selon les recommandations du National Cancer Institute (NCI, 2012), les connaissances actuellement disponibles ne permettent pas d’établir un lien de causalité entre stress et augmentation du risque de cancer. Si le professionnel de soin psychique ne doit donc pas cautionner ce lien hypothétique au risque de culpabiliser le patient, il gardera à l’esprit, d’une part, que le cancer peut en revanche générer un stress bien réel au quotidien chez les patients atteints par cette maladie et, d’autre part, que ces théories « profanes » peuvent parfois témoigner d’un mécanisme de défense contre ce stress.

Psychological Stress and Cellular Aging in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological evidence continues to accumulate on the effect of psychosocial and behavioral factors in relation to cancer risk, progression, and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This article presents the current evidence on the relationship between psychological stress and the risk of cancer and cellular aging process. Ten databases were searched to identify publications up to September 2019. References from retrieved articles were also reviewed. We included nine review papers and 26 cohort or case-control studies based on inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Results of previously published review articles did not show consistent evidence for the association between cancer risk and psychological stress, while previous evidence is stronger regarding the role of chronic psychological stress on cancer growth and metastasis and aging. In seven observational studies, severe life events, anxiety, depression, insufficient social support perception, or avoiding coping strategy were significantly associated with breast cancer risk. For other specific types of cancer, 11 studies reported increased risk factors for stressful life events, and two others found increased mortality or a decline in treatment adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent epidemiological evidence generally suggests psychosocial factors may be considered risk factors for specific types of cancer and play a key role in the cellular aging process. Understanding molecular mechanisms of the stress interaction is important in cancer management and prevention. The psychological stressors should be considered when developing or evaluating change in psychosocial practice.