1
|
Pichler T, Mumm F, Dehar N, Dickman E, Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna C, Dinkel A, Heinrich K, Hennink M, Parviainen AD, Raske V, Wicki N, Moore AC. Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6913. [PMID: 38298115 PMCID: PMC10905543 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision oncology, using comprehensive biomarker testing (cBT) to inform individual cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, includes increasingly complex technology and clinical data sets. People impacted by cancer (patients and caregivers) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) face distinct challenges in navigating the cBT and personalized treatment landscape. This review summarizes evidence regarding cBT-related communication between people impacted by cancer and HCPs and identifies important avenues for future research in precision oncology. METHODS A scoping review was conducted using records published in PubMed during January 2017-August 2022, focusing on the breadth of topics on patient-HCP communication and knowledge resources used by HCPs as guidance in cBT-related communication. Data were extracted from records meeting inclusion criteria, and findings were summarized according to main topics. RESULTS The search identified 287 unique records and data were extracted from 42 records, including nine from expert input. Most records originated from the United States included patients with different types of cancer, and oncologists were the main HCPs. Patients' motivation for undergoing cBT and receiving results was generally high in different settings. However, patients' understanding of cBT-related concepts was limited, and their knowledge and information preferences changed based on cBT implications and significance to family members. HCPs were valued by patients as a trusted source of information. Limited evidence was available on HCPs' information-seeking behavior and factors influencing cBT-related knowledge and confidence, often self-reported as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS Patient education by knowledgeable and confident HCPs, information management and a caring patient-HCP relationship communicating continuity of care regardless of cBT results are crucial to empower patients and shared decision-making in precision oncology. More data on the process and structure of cBT-related communication, distinction between and characterization of different timepoints of patient-HCP interactions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Pichler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University HospitalLMU MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University HospitalLMU MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Navdeep Dehar
- Department of Medical OncologyQueen's UniversityKingstonOntarioCanada
| | - Erin Dickman
- Oncology Nursing SocietyPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Celia Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna
- European Oncology Nursing SocietyBrusselsBelgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of NursingBarcelona UniversityBarcelonaCataloniaSpain
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and HealthTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich TUM (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | | | - Anndra D. Parviainen
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grauman Å, Ancillotti M, Veldwijk J, Mascalzoni D. Precision cancer medicine and the doctor-patient relationship: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:286. [PMID: 38098034 PMCID: PMC10722840 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02395-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of precision medicine is likely to have a huge impact on clinical cancer care, while the doctor-patient relationship is a crucial aspect of cancer care that needs to be preserved. This systematic review aimed to map out perceptions and concerns regarding how the implementation of precision medicine will impact the doctor-patient relationship in cancer care so that threats against the doctor-patient relationship can be addressed. METHODS Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Social Science Premium Collection) were searched for articles published from January 2010 to December 2021, including qualitative, quantitative, and theoretical methods. Two reviewers completed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction. Findings were summarized and explained using narrative synthesis. RESULTS Four themes were generated from the included articles (n = 35). Providing information addresses issues of information transmission and needs, and of complex concepts such as genetics and uncertainty. Making decisions in a trustful relationship addresses opacity issues, the role of trust, and and physicians' attitude towards the role of precision medicine tools in decision-making. Managing negative reactions of non-eligible patients addresses patients' unmet expectations of precision medicine. Conflicting roles in the blurry line between clinic and research addresses issues stemming from physicians' double role as doctors and researchers. CONCLUSIONS Many findings have previously been addressed in doctor-patient communication and clinical genetics. However, precision medicine adds complexity to these fields and further emphasizes the importance of clear communication on specific themes like the distinction between genomic and gene expression and patients' expectations about access, eligibility, effectiveness, and side effects of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Å Grauman
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
| | - M Ancillotti
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
| | - J Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hamilton JG, Shah IH, Salafia C, Schofield E, Garzon MG, Cadet K, Stadler ZK, Hay JL, Offit K, Robson ME. Development of a novel measure of advanced cancer patients' perceived utility of secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100124. [PMID: 37214538 PMCID: PMC10194097 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) can inform advanced cancer patients' treatment decisions, and also reveal secondary germline findings-information about inherited risks for cancer and other disorders. We sought to develop a measure of patient perceptions of the clinical and personal utility of secondary germline findings. Methods We developed a draft survey based on literature and patient interview data (n=40). We evaluated and refined the survey through cognitive interviews with advanced cancer patients who received secondary germline findings from TGP (n=10). The survey was psychometrically validated with data from two independent samples of advanced cancer patients undergoing TGP (total n=349). Results Cognitive interviews offered opportunities for survey refinement and confirmation of its comprehensible nature. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the survey identified 16 items across three subscales with strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79): perceived utility for others, perceived utility for self and health, and confidence in secondary findings. Conclusion We developed a novel valid scale with promise for measuring advanced cancer patients' perceptions of the utility of secondary germline findings. Innovation We offer a new patient-derived measure of perceived utility of and confidence in secondary germline findings with potential applications for precision oncology research and clinical communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada G. Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ibrahim H. Shah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caroline Salafia
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaux Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kechna Cadet
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Hay
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gereis JM, Hetherington K, Robertson EG, Daly R, Donoghoe MW, Ziegler DS, Marshall GM, Lau LMS, Marron JM, Wakefield CE. Parents' and adolescents' perspectives and understanding of information about childhood cancer precision medicine. Cancer 2023; 129:3645-3655. [PMID: 37376781 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision medicine is projected to become integral to childhood cancer care. As such, it is essential to support families to understand what precision medicine entails. METHODS A total of 182 parents and 23 adolescent patients participating in Precision Medicine for Children with Cancer (PRISM), an Australian precision medicine clinical trial for high-risk childhood cancer, completed questionnaires after study enrollment (time 0 [T0]). Of the parents, 108 completed a questionnaire and 45 completed an interview following return of precision medicine results (time 1 [T1]). We analyzed the mixed-methods data comprising measures exploring families' perceptions and understanding of PRISM's participant information sheet and consent form (PISCF), and factors associated with understanding. RESULTS Most parents were satisfied with the PISCF, rating it as at least "somewhat" clearly presented (n = 160/175; 91%) and informative (n = 158/175; 90%). Many suggested improvements including the use of clearer language and a more visually engaging format. Parents' actual understanding of precision medicine was low on average, but scores improved between T0 and T1 (55.8/100-60.0/100; p = .012). Parents from culturally and/or linguistically diverse backgrounds (n = 42/177; 25%) had lower actual understanding scores than those from a Western/European background whose first language was English (p = .010). There was little correlation between parents' perceived and actual understanding scores (p = .794; Pearson correlation -0.020; 95% CI, -0.169 to 0.116). Most adolescent patients read the PISCF either "briefly" or "not at all" (70%) and had a perceived understanding score of 63.6/100 on average. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed gaps in families' understanding of childhood cancer precision medicine. We highlighted areas for potential intervention such as through targeted information resources. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Precision medicine is projected to become part of the standard of care for children with cancer. Precision medicine aims to give the right treatment to the right patient and involves several complex techniques, many of which may be challenging to understand. Our study analyzed questionnaire and interview data from parents and adolescent patients enrolled in an Australian precision medicine trial. Findings revealed gaps in families' understanding of childhood cancer precision medicine. Drawing on parents' suggestions and the literature, we make brief recommendations about improving information provision to families, such as through targeted information resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Gereis
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eden G Robertson
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Daly
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark W Donoghoe
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David S Ziegler
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Glenn M Marshall
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Loretta M S Lau
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan M Marron
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Expectations, concerns, and attitudes regarding whole-genome sequencing studies: a survey of cancer patients, families, and the public in Japan. J Hum Genet 2022; 68:281-285. [PMID: 36509867 PMCID: PMC10040335 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-022-01100-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is being used in research and clinical settings in cancer genomics. Studies show that cancer patients generally have positive attitudes toward tumor profiling tests; however, few works revealed their attitudes toward WGS. This study clarifies the expectations, concerns, and result preferences of cancer patients (CPs), family members (FMs) and general adults (GAs) regarding WGS study in Japan. We conducted an anonymous survey with 1204 CPs, 5968 FMs, and 2915 GAs in 2021. Despite low awareness of the WGS studies, CPs had the highest expectations for it. FMs had a higher level of concern than CPs and GAs; feeling anxious by knowing the results, being treated unfavorably if germline findings were detected. Both the FMs and CPs were highly concerned about the protection of genetic information. CPs preferred results with actionability, however, only half preferred to know germline findings. Given the possibility of detecting variants across multidisciplinary diseases and the long-term continuity of WGS research, a system is needed in which study participants can consult and receive decision-making support at any time according to their needs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Heinrich K, Miller-Phillips L, Ziemann F, Hasselmann K, Rühlmann K, Flach M, Biro D, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Holch J, Herold T, von Baumgarten L, Greif PA, Jeremias I, Wuerstlein R, Casuscelli J, Spitzweg C, Seidensticker M, Renz B, Corradini S, Baumeister P, Goni E, Tufman A, Jung A, Kumbrink J, Kirchner T, Klauschen F, Metzeler KH, Heinemann V, Westphalen CB. Lessons learned: the first consecutive 1000 patients of the CCCMunich LMU Molecular Tumor Board. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 149:1905-1915. [PMID: 35796778 PMCID: PMC9261163 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In 2016, the University of Munich Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) was implemented to initiate a precision oncology program. This review of cases was conducted to assess clinical implications and functionality of the program, to identify current limitations and to inform future directions of these efforts. Methods Charts, molecular profiles, and tumor board decisions of the first 1000 consecutive cases (01/2016–03/2020) were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were applied to describe relevant findings. Results Of the first 1000 patients presented to the MTB; 914 patients received comprehensive genomic profiling. Median age of patients was 56 years and 58% were female. The most prevalent diagnoses were breast (16%) and colorectal cancer (10%). Different types of targeted or genome-wide sequencing assays were used; most of them offered by the local department of pathology. Testing was technically successful in 88%. In 41% of cases, a genomic alteration triggered a therapeutic recommendation. The fraction of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation differed significantly between malignancies ranging from over 50% in breast or biliary tract to less than 30% in pancreatic cancers. Based on a retrospective chart review, 17% of patients with an MTB recommendation received appropriate treatment. Conclusion Based on these retrospective analyses, patients with certain malignancies (breast and biliary tract cancer) tend to be more likely to have actionable variants. The low rate of therapeutic implementation (17% of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation) underscores the importance of meticulous follow-up for these patients and ensuring broad access to innovative therapies for patients receiving molecular tumor profiling. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04165-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Lisa Miller-Phillips
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Ziemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Korbinian Hasselmann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Rühlmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Madeleine Flach
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorottya Biro
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Holch
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Herold
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp A Greif
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Irmela Jeremias
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Apoptosis in Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Munich, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, Dr Von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Department of Medicine IV and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Renz
- Department of General, Visceral und Transplantation Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Baumeister
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Goni
- Department of Medicine II and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Department of Medicine V and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Kumbrink
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Cell Therapy and Hemostaseology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mass Spectrometry and Mass Spectrometry Imaging-based Thyroid Cancer Analysis. JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS AND TESTING 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s41664-022-00218-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Waldman L, Hancock K, Gallinger B, Johnstone B, Brunga L, Malkin D, Barrera M, Villani A. Perspectives and Experiences of Parents and Adolescents Who Participate in a Pediatric Precision Oncology Program: "When You Feel Helpless, This Kind of Thing Is Very Helpful". JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100444. [PMID: 35357906 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The SickKids Cancer Sequencing (KiCS) Program, launched in 2016, evaluates the clinical utility of paired tumor/germline Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in pediatric oncology patients with hard-to-cure and rare cancers. In anticipation of further widespread adoption of NGS, we aimed to characterize the experiences and perspectives of adolescents and parents of patients who have already undergone NGS evaluation, focusing on the psychosocial impact and personal utility. METHODS Parents of patients with pediatric cancer and adolescent patients who have participated in KiCS were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive content analytic approach. RESULTS Of 45 individuals invited, 22 parents and 10 adolescents were interviewed (71% response rate). Prominent psychosocial themes were low distress, relief, and sense of control; some expressed fear of the unknown. In exploring constructs of personal utility, parents highlighted hope for treatment options despite low expectations for results with clinical impact, whereas adolescents articulated altruistic motivations and less hope for personal clinical benefit. Bringing closure and answering the question of why the cancer occurred was a salient theme among both groups. Both parents and adolescents find benefit and clear decisional satisfaction with participation. No participants expressed regret. CONCLUSION This study suggests that parents and adolescents benefit from NGS evaluation beyond the return of clinically relevant results. Our findings lay the framework for future work evaluating the value of NGS in pediatric precision oncology care through assessment of patient-reported outcomes and experiences. These results also guide provision of pre- and post-test education and support, which will facilitate patient-centered delivery of NGS practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Waldman
- Cancer Genetics and High Risk Program, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Hancock
- Department of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bailey Gallinger
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Genetic Counselling, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brittney Johnstone
- Cancer Genetics and High Risk Program, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ledia Brunga
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Malkin
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maru Barrera
- Department of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anita Villani
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Milbury CA, Creeden J, Yip WK, Smith DL, Pattani V, Maxwell K, Sawchyn B, Gjoerup O, Meng W, Skoletsky J, Concepcion AD, Tang Y, Bai X, Dewal N, Ma P, Bailey ST, Thornton J, Pavlick DC, Frampton GM, Lieber D, White J, Burns C, Vietz C. Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne®CDx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay for solid tumors. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264138. [PMID: 35294956 PMCID: PMC8926248 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) is a United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved companion diagnostic test to identify patients who may benefit from treatment in accordance with the approved therapeutic product labeling for 28 drug therapies. F1CDx utilizes next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) technology to examine 324 cancer genes in solid tumors. F1CDx reports known and likely pathogenic short variants (SVs), copy number alterations (CNAs), and select rearrangements, as well as complex biomarkers including tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), in addition to genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) in ovarian cancer. CGP services can reduce the complexity of biomarker testing, enabling precision medicine to improve treatment decision-making and outcomes for cancer patients, but only if test results are reliable, accurate, and validated clinically and analytically to the highest standard available. The analyses presented herein demonstrate the extensive analytical and clinical validation supporting the F1CDx initial and subsequent FDA approvals to ensure high sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the data reported. The analytical validation included several in-depth evaluations of F1CDx assay performance including limit of detection (LoD), limit of blank (LoB), precision, and orthogonal concordance for SVs (including base substitutions [SUBs] and insertions/deletions [INDELs]), CNAs (including amplifications and homozygous deletions), genomic rearrangements, and select complex biomarkers. The assay validation of >30,000 test results comprises a considerable and increasing body of evidence that supports the clinical utility of F1CDx to match patients with solid tumors to targeted therapies or immunotherapies based on their tumor's genomic alterations and biomarkers. F1CDx meets the clinical needs of providers and patients to receive guideline-based biomarker testing, helping them keep pace with a rapidly evolving field of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coren A. Milbury
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - James Creeden
- Global Medical Affairs, Basel, MA, United States of America
| | - Wai-Ki Yip
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - David L. Smith
- Department of Franchise Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Varun Pattani
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Kristi Maxwell
- Department of Health Economic and Outcomes Research & Payer Policy, Reimbursement, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Bethany Sawchyn
- Department of Scientific and Medical Publications, Clinical Operations, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Ole Gjoerup
- Department of Scientific and Medical Publications, Clinical Operations, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Wei Meng
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Joel Skoletsky
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Yanhua Tang
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Xiaobo Bai
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Ninad Dewal
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Pei Ma
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Shannon T. Bailey
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - James Thornton
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Dean C. Pavlick
- Department of Cancer Genomics, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Daniel Lieber
- Department of Computational Biology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Jared White
- Department of Computational Biology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Christine Burns
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Christine Vietz
- Department Product Development, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pichler T, Marten-Mittag B, Hermelink K, Telzerow E, Frank T, Ackermann U, Belka C, Combs SE, Gratzke C, Gschwend J, Harbeck N, Heinemann V, Herkommer K, Kiechle M, Mahner S, Pigorsch S, Rauch J, Stief C, Mumm F, Heußner P, Herschbach P, Dinkel A. Distress in hospitalized cancer patients: Associations with personality traits, clinical and psychosocial characteristics. Psychooncology 2021; 31:770-778. [PMID: 34894364 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve allocation of psychosocial care and to provide patient-oriented support offers, identification of determinants of elevated distress is needed. So far, there is a lack of evidence investigating the interplay between individual disposition and current clinical and psychosocial determinants of distress in the inpatient setting. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we investigated 879 inpatients with different cancer sites treated in a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. Assessment of determinants of elevated distress included sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics as well as dimensions of personality. Multiple linear regression was applied to identify determinants of psychosocial distress. RESULTS Mean age of the patients was M = 61.9 (SD = 11.8), 48.1% were women. In the multiple linear regression model younger age (β = -0.061, p = 0.033), higher neuroticism (β = 0.178, p = <0.001), having metastases (β = 0.091, p = 0.002), being in a worse physical condition (β = 0.380, p = <0.001), depressive symptoms (β = 0.270, p = <0.001), not feeling well informed about psychological support (β = 0.054, p = 0.046) and previous uptake of psychological treatment (β = 0.067, p = 0.020) showed significant associations with higher psychosocial distress. The adjusted R2 of the overall model was 0.464. CONCLUSION Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and dispositional vulnerability, that is neuroticism, current clinical and psychosocial characteristics were still associated with hospitalized patients' psychosocial distress. Psycho-oncologists should address both, the more transient emotional responses, such as depressive symptoms, as well as more enduring patient characteristics, like neuroticism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Pichler
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCC Munich), Munich, Germany.,Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Birgitt Marten-Mittag
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hermelink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Telzerow
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tamara Frank
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCC Munich), Munich, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Ackermann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTZ), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCC Munich), Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Josefine Rauch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCC Munich), Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pia Heußner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Cancer Center Oberland, Garmisch-Partenkirchen General Hospital, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - Peter Herschbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. Genet Med 2021; 23:2105-2113. [PMID: 34257420 PMCID: PMC8556289 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To address demands for timely germline information to guide treatments, we evaluated experiences of patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer with a mainstreaming genetic testing model wherein multigene panel testing was ordered by oncologists with standardized pre-test patient education, and genetic counselors delivered results and post-test genetic counseling via telephone. Methods: Among 1203 eligible patients, we conducted a prospective single-arm study to examine patient uptake and acceptability (via self-report surveys at baseline and three-weeks and three-months following result return) of this mainstreaming model. Results: Only 10% of eligible patients declined participation. Among 1054 tested participants, 10% had pathogenic variants (PV), 16% had variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and 74% had no variant identified (NV). Participants reported high initial acceptability, including high satisfaction with their testing decision. Variability over time in several outcomes existed for participants with PV or NV: Those with NV experienced a temporary increase in depression (pTime<0.001; pTime2<0.001), and those with PV experienced a small increase in genetic testing distress (p=0.03). Findings suggested that result type, sex, and cancer type were also associated with outcomes including clinical depression and uncertainty. Conclusion: This mainstreaming model may offer a feasible approach for extending access to germline genetic information.
Collapse
|
12
|
Shirdarreh M, Aziza O, Pezo RC, Jerzak KJ, Warner E. Patients' and Oncologists' Knowledge and Expectations Regarding Tumor Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing: A Narrative Review. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1359-e1371. [PMID: 33823080 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor multigene next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly being offered to cancer patients to guide clinical management and determine eligibility for clinical trials. We undertook a review of studies examining the knowledge and attitudes of patients and oncologists regarding the primary results and potential secondary findings of such testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search was conducted through the MEDLINE database using the following keywords: "neoplasms" and "molecular sequencing / genome sequencing / tumor profiling / NGS / whole exome sequencing" and "patient / oncologist" and "knowledge / attitudes / satisfaction / experience / evaluation / perspective / practice / preference." Articles meeting the inclusion criteria and additional relevant articles from their references were selected. RESULTS From 1,142 publications identified by the search and 9 from references, 21 publications were included in the final review. Patients generally had positive attitudes toward tumor NGS despite relatively little knowledge of test-related genetics concepts, but their expectations often exceeded the reality of low clinical utility. Patients with higher education and greater genetics knowledge had more realistic expectations and a more altruistic view of the role of NGS. Attitudes toward disclosure of secondary findings were highly variable. Oncologists had poor to moderate genomic literacy; they communicated challenges with tempering patient expectations and deciding what information to disclose. CONCLUSION Patients considering undergoing tumor NGS should be provided with easily understandable resources explaining the procedure, goals, and probable outcomes, whenever possible based on evidence-based guidelines. Continuing medical education programs on this topic for oncology health care professionals should strive to improve their genomic literacy and instruct them on how to optimally present this information to their patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Oncologists are increasingly offering tumor multigene testing to patients with advanced cancers to guide more "personalized" treatment and/or determine eligibility for clinical trials. However, patients often have inadequate understanding and unrealistic expectations. Oncologists must ensure that they themselves have sufficient knowledge of the benefits and limitations of testing and must provide their patients with appropriate educational resources. Prior to testing, patients should be told the likelihood of finding a mutation in their specific tumor type for which a targeted treatment or clinical trial is available. Patients also need clear information about the possibility and implications of secondary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melika Shirdarreh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Orly Aziza
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rossanna C Pezo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Katarzyna J Jerzak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ellen Warner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pichler T, Rohrmoser A, Letsch A, Westphalen CB, Keilholz U, Heinemann V, Lamping M, Jost PJ, Riedmann K, Herschbach P, Goerling U. Information, communication, and cancer patients' trust in the physician: what challenges do we have to face in an era of precision cancer medicine? Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:2171-2178. [PMID: 32885314 PMCID: PMC7892511 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05692-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Despite promising achievements in precision cancer medicine (PCM), participating patients are still faced with manifold uncertainties, especially regarding a potential treatment benefit of molecular diagnostics (MD). Hence, MD poses considerable challenges for patient information and communication. To meet these challenges, healthcare professionals need to gain deeper insight into patients’ subjective experiences. Therefore, this qualitative study examined information aspects of MD programs in cancer patients. Methods In two German Comprehensive Cancer Centers, 30 cancer patients undergoing MD participated in semi-structured interviews on information transfer and information needs regarding MD. Additionally, patients provided sociodemographic and medical data and indicated their subjective level of information (visual analogue scale, VAS, 0–10). Results On average patients had high levels of information (mean = 7, median = 8); nevertheless 20% (n = 6) showed an information level below 5 points. Qualitative analysis revealed that patients show limited understanding of the complex background of MD and have uncertainties regarding their personal benefit. Further, patients described unmet information needs. Existential threat in awaiting the results was experienced as burdensome. To withstand the strains of their situation, patients emphasized the importance of trusting their physician. Conclusion The challenges in PCM consist in providing unambiguous information, especially concerning treatment benefit, and providing guidance and support. Therefore, psycho-oncology needs to develop guidelines for adequate patient communication in order to help healthcare providers and cancer patients to handle these challenges in the developing field of PCM. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05692-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Pichler
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, partner site TUM, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. .,Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, partner site LMU, University hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Amy Rohrmoser
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, partner site LMU, University hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, partner site LMU, University hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mario Lamping
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp J Jost
- Center for Personalized Oncology (ZPO), Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, partner site TUM, Munich, Germany.,Medical Department III for Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM, Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Riedmann
- Center for Personalized Oncology (ZPO), Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, partner site TUM, Munich, Germany.,Medical Department III for Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ute Goerling
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|