1
|
Hall DL, Yeh GY, O’Cleirigh C, Wagner LI, Peppercorn J, Denninger J, Hirschberg AM, Lee H, Markwart M, Siefring E, Mizrach HR, Li R, Mian Z, Tsuchiyose E, Wen A, Bullock AJ, Park ER. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of IN FOCUS: A Mind-Body Resiliency Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e70026. [PMID: 39549022 PMCID: PMC11780542 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent and distressing among survivors of cancer. Evidence-based mind-body and cognitive-behavioral skills lack integration and testing in scalable formats. OBJECTIVE This pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04876599) tested a synchronous, virtual mind-body group resiliency intervention for FCR (IN FOCUS). METHOD Adults with elevated FCR (FCR Inventory severity ≥ 16; 16-21 = elevated, 22-36 = clinically elevated) after completing primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to eight weekly sessions of IN FOCUS or usual care (UC; synchronous, virtual community group support referral). Feasibility metrics included ≥ 70% retention per arm (primary outcome), ≥ 75% attendance in ≥ 6 sessions, ≥ 75% adherence to relaxation skills practice ≥ 3 days per week and by delivery fidelity (% content covered in video-recorded sessions). Acceptability was assessed quantitatively via ratings of enjoyableness, convenience, helpfulness, odds of future use, and satisfaction (benchmark ≥ 80% of ratings ≥ 4 on 1-5 Likert scale) and qualitatively via individual exit interviews. Linear mixed models explicated slopes in FCR (secondary) and resiliency (exploratory; Current Experiences Scale) from baseline to 2 months (primary endpoint) and 5 months using intention-to-treat. RESULTS From July 2021 to March 2022, 64 survivors enrolled (25-73 years old, M = 7 years since diagnosis). IN FOCUS was feasible and acceptable (91% retention; attendance median = 7 sessions, 97% relaxation practice adherence, 95% content fully covered; 82% of acceptability ratings ≥ 4). Interviews (n = 59) revealed benefits in both arms. By 2 months, compared to UC, IN FOCUS reduced FCR to a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = -2.4; 95% CI = -4.2, -0.7; d = 0.66). By 5 months, FCR effects had attenuated (Mdiff = -0.16, 95% CI -1.97, 1.65; d = -0.04), although levels of resiliency had increased with a medium-to-large effect (Mdiff = 10.0; 95% CI = 4.9, 15.1; d = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS For survivors of non-metastatic cancer, a synchronous, virtual mind-body resiliency program for FCR is feasible, acceptable, and seemingly beneficial compared to a community group referral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L. Hall
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gloria Y. Yeh
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Conall O’Cleirigh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John Denninger
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - April M. Hirschberg
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hang Lee
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Emma Siefring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Raissa Li
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Zainab Mian
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Angela Wen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea J. Bullock
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang X, Li Y, Lin J, Zheng J, Xiao H, Chen W, Huang F. Fear of recurrence in postoperative lung cancer patients: Trajectories, influencing factors and impacts on quality of life. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:1409-1420. [PMID: 37908060 PMCID: PMC11549006 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the trajectory, influencing factors and dynamic relationships between fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and quality of life (QOL) in lung cancer patients. DESIGN Prospective longitudinal study. METHODS Longitudinal data from 310 lung cancer patients across three hospitals in China were assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (T1 -T4 ). Descriptive statistics characterised patient demographics, clinical characteristics, levels of FCR and QOL. A linear mixed-effects model was employed to analyse FCR trajectories, identify influencing factors on these trajectories, and predict the impact of FCR on QOL. RESULTS FCR changed significantly over time, with a slight decrease during T1 -T2 , an increase at T3 and gradual decline at T4 . Higher fear levels were associated with female sex, suburban or rural residency, being a family breadwinner, presence of comorbidities and negative coping behaviours, and low family resilience. QOL negatively correlated with FCR, and FCR predicted lower QOL. CONCLUSIONS At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, lung cancer patients, especially women, suburban or rural residents, family breadwinners, those with comorbidities, negative coping behaviours and low family resilience, reported high levels of FCR. Healthcare providers should pay special attention to lung cancer patients especially during the period of 3-6 months post-surgery and offer tailored interventions to improve their QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE Understanding the FCR trajectories, its influencing factors and its negative impacts on QOL can guide the development of targeted interventions to reduce fear and enhance well-being in patients with cancer. IMPACT Identifying the trajectories and influencing factors of fear of lung cancer recurrence in patients at different time points informs future research on targeted interventions to improve QOL. REPORTING METHOD The study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Statement on Reporting Observational Longitudinal Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Yang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Yonglin Li
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jialing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianqing Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Huimin Xiao
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weiti Chen
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Feifei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Liu S, Miao Q, Zhang X, Wei H, Feng S, Li X. The Heterogeneity of Symptom Burden and Fear of Progression Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Latent Class Analysis. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2024; 17:1205-1219. [PMID: 38524288 PMCID: PMC10959014 DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s454787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may experience symptoms that increase their fear of progression (FoP), but a dearth of research examines the issue from a patient-centered perspective. Our study aimed to first determine the category of symptom burden, then to explore the differences in characteristics of patients in different subgroups, and finally to analyze the impact of symptom subgroup on FoP. Patients and Methods Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics, Symptom Experience Scale, and Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form were used. Latent class analysis was used to group KTRs according to the occurrence of symptoms. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyze the predictors of different subgroups. The differences in FoP among symptom burden subgroups were analyzed by hierarchical multiple regression. Results Three subgroups were identified, designated all-high (20.5%), moderate (39.9%), and all-low (39.6%) according to their symptom occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression showed that gender, post-transplant time, per capita monthly income, and hyperuricemia were the factors that distinguished and predicted the all-high subgroup (P < 0.05). Hierarchical multiple regression showed that symptom burden had a significant effect on FoP (class1 vs class3: β = 0.327, P < 0.001; class2 vs class3: β = 0.104, P = 0.046), explaining the 8.0% variance of FoP (ΔR2 = 0.080). Conclusion KTRs generally experience moderate or low symptom burden, and symptom burden is an influencing factor in FoP. Identifying the traits of KTRs with high symptom burden can help clinicians develop targeted management strategies and ease FoP of KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sainan Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi Miao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xu Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - He Wei
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuang Feng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaofei Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park SK, Min YH. Fear of cancer recurrence in South Korean survivors of breast cancer who have received adjuvant endocrine therapy: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1170077. [PMID: 37575431 PMCID: PMC10414191 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most-prevalent psychological problems among cancer survivors, and younger females who have received endocrine therapy are particularly at risk of high FCR. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between high FCR and factors related to it in South Korean patients with breast cancer who receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 326 patients with breast cancer who had received AET. All participants were asked to complete a personal information sheet, the short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire, and the Menopause Rating Scale. The factors associated with high FCR were analyzed using association-rule analysis. Results The mean FCR score was 32.24 (SD = 10.22), and 137 of the 326 (42.0%) patients had high scores (≥34). Hot flushes and sweating (moderate to extremely severe), depressed mood (moderate to extremely severe), irritability (moderate to extremely severe), invasive stage, taking tamoxifen, and being married were associated with high FCR. Conclusion Since FCR was common in patients with breast cancer who received AET, patients at a greater risk of experiencing FCR must be screened and supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seul Ki Park
- Department of Nursing, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yul Ha Min
- College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Kangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|