The fraction of NO in exhaled air and estimates of alveolar NO in adolescents with asthma: methodological aspects

Effect of exhalation flow rates and level of nitric oxide output on accuracy of linear approximation of pulmonary nitric oxide dynamics

The method of Tsoukias and George (T and G) is a commonly used linear approximation of pulmonary nitric oxide (NO) dynamics that can be used to calculate bronchial NO output (J_awNO) and alveolar NO concentration (C_ANO). We aimed to investigate how flow rate range in exhaled NO measurements and levels of pulmonary NO parameters affect the accuracy of the T and G method. This study has three parts. (a) A theoretical part demonstrating how different exhalation flow rates and NO parameter levels affect the accuracy of the T and G method, (b) testing how exhalation flow rate range affects the method in a sample of asthmatic and healthy subjects, and (c) a meta-analysis of published literature to test whether minimum flow rate has an association with the NO parameter values. We found that both the chosen exhalation flow rates and magnitude of the pulmonary NO parameters affect the accuracy of the T and G method. Underestimation ofJ_awNO increased with lower flow rates and higher bronchial diffusion factor of NO (D_awNO), while overestimation of C_ANO increased with higher D_awNO and bronchial wall NO concentration (C_awNO) and lower C_ANO. Of the NO parameters, C_ANO was the most prone to bias and high D_awNO was the most significant factor causing the bias. Furthermore, we found that using 40 ml s^-1as the lowest flow rate in our sample and 50 ml s^-1in the meta-analysis compared to 100 ml s^-1resulted in higher C_ANO, but J_awNO was not statistically significantly affected. We have provided objective evidence that not only the flow rates used but also the magnitude of NO output in the test subjects affect the accuracy of the T and G method. We suggest that flow rates below 100 ml s^-1should not be used with the T and G method to maintain accuracy.

Flow-independent nitric oxide parameters in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO) has been proposed as a non-invasive marker of inflammation in the lungs. Measuring F_ENO at several flow rates enables the calculation of flow independent NO-parameters that describe the NO-exchange dynamics of the lungs more precisely. The purpose of this study was to compare the NO-parameters between asthmatics and healthy subjects in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases. All studies with asthmatic and healthy control groups with at least one NO-parameter calculated were included.

RESULTS

From 1137 identified studies, 33 were included in the meta-analysis. All NO-parameters (alveolar NO concentration (C_ANO), bronchial flux of NO (J_awNO), bronchial mucosal NO concentration (C_awNO) and bronchial wall NO diffusion capacity (D_awNO)) were found increased in glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naïve asthma. J_awNO and C_ANO were most notably increased in both study groups. Elevation of D_awNO and C_awNO seemed less prominent in both asthma groups.

DISCUSSION

We found that all the NO-parameters are elevated in asthma as compared to healthy subjects. However, results were highly heterogenous and the evidence on C_awNO and D_awNO is still quite feeble due to only few studies reporting them. To gain more knowledge on the NO-parameters in asthma, nonlinear methods and standardized study protocols should be used in future studies.

Effect of Betel (Areca) Nut Chewing on Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide: A Pilot Study

Betel (areca) nuts are extensively chewed in many countries. This has been associated with respiratory symptoms. We aimed to determine whether betel nut chewing is associated with acute changes in fractional exhaled nitric oxide, a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation. Betel nut chewing resulted in an immediate significant decline in fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels that persisted for up to 180 minutes. This effect has to be taken into account in epidemiological studies, reference ranges, and patient preparation.

Influence of mouthwashes on extended exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) analysis

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO) is used to assess eosinophilic inflammation of the airways. F_ENO values are influenced by the expiratory flow rate and orally produced NO. We measured F_ENO at four different expiratory flow levels after two different mouthwashes: tap water and carbonated water. Further, we compared the alveolar NO concentration (C_ANO), maximum airway NO flux (J'_awNO) and airway NO diffusion (D_awNO) after these two mouthwashes. F_ENO was measured in 30 volunteers (healthy or asthmatic) with a chemiluminescence NO-analyser at flow rates of 30, 50, 100 and 300 mL/s. A mouthwash was performed before the measurement at every flow rate. The carbonated water mouthwash significantly reduced F_ENO compared to the tap water mouthwash at all expiratory flows: 50 mL/s (p < .001), 30 mL/s (p = .001), 100 mL/s (p < .001) and 300 mL/s (p = .004). J'_awNO was also significantly reduced (p = .017), however, there were no significant differences in C_ANO and D_awNO. In conclusion, a carbonated water mouthwash can significantly reduce oropharyngeal NO compared to a tap water mouthwash at expiratory flows of 30-300 mL/s without affecting the C_ANO and D_awNO. Therefore, mouthwashes need to be taken into account when comparing F_ENO results.

Reduction of FENO by tap water and carbonated water mouthwashes: magnitude and time course

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO) assesses eosinophilic inflammation of the airways, but F_ENO values are also influenced by oral nitric oxide (NO). The aim of this pilot study was to measure F_ENO and compare the effect of two different mouthwashes on F_ENO and analyse the duration of the effect. F_ENO was measured in 12 randomized volunteers (healthy or asthmatic subjects) with a NIOX VERO® analyser at an expiratory flow rate of 50 mL/s. After a baseline measurement, a mouthwash was performed either with tap water or carbonated water and was measured during 20 min in 2 min intervals. The procedure was repeated with the other mouthwash. We found that both mouthwashes reduced F_ENO immediately at the beginning compared to the baseline (p < .001). The carbonated water mouthwash effect lasted 12 min (p ranging from <0.001 to <0.05). The tap water mouthwash reduced F_ENO statistically significantly only for 2 min compared with the baseline. We conclude that a single carbonated water mouthwash can significantly reduce the oropharyngeal NO contribution during a 12 min time interval.

Overall and peripheral lung function assessment by spirometry and forced oscillation technique in relation to asthma diagnosis and control

BACKGROUND

Classic spirometry is effort dependent and of limited value in assessing small airways. Peripheral airway involvement, and relation to poor control, in asthma, has been highlighted recently. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) offers an effort-independent assessment of overall and peripheral lung mechanics. We studied the association between lung function variables, obtained either by spirometry or multifrequency (5, 11 and 19 Hz) FOT, and asthma diagnosis and control.

METHODS

Spirometry measures, resistance at 5 (R5) and 19 Hz (R19), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), resonant frequency (f_res ), resistance difference between 5-19 Hz (R5-R19) and Asthma Control Test scores were determined in 234 asthmatic and 60 healthy subjects (aged 13-39 years). We used standardized lung function variables in logistic regression analyses, unadjusted and adjusted for age, height, gender and weight.

RESULTS

Lower FEV₁ /FVC (OR [95% CI] 0.47 [0.32, 0.69]) and FEF₅₀ (0.62 [0.46, 0.85]) per standard deviation increase, and higher R5 (3.31 [1.95, 5.62]) and R19 (2.54 [1.65, 3.91]) were associated with asthma diagnosis. Independent predictive effects of FEV₁ /FVC and R5 or R19, respectively, were found for asthma diagnosis. Lower FEV₁ /FVC and altered peripheral FOT measures (X5, f_res and R5-R19) were associated with uncontrolled asthma (P-values < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance FOT measures were equally informative as spirometry, related to asthma diagnosis, and, furthermore, offered additive information to FEV₁ /FVC, supporting a complementary role for FOT. Asthma control was related to FOT measures of peripheral airways, suggesting a potential use in identifying such involvement. Further studies are needed to determine a clinical value and relevant reference values in children, for the multifrequency FOT measurements.

A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease

Breath tests cover the fraction of nitric oxide in expired gas (F_eNO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), variables in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and other measurements. For EBC and for F_eNO, official recommendations for standardised procedures are more than 10 years old and there is none for exhaled VOCs and particles. The aim of this document is to provide technical standards and recommendations for sample collection and analytic approaches and to highlight future research priorities in the field. For EBC and F_eNO, new developments and advances in technology have been evaluated in the current document. This report is not intended to provide clinical guidance on disease diagnosis and management.Clinicians and researchers with expertise in exhaled biomarkers were invited to participate. Published studies regarding methodology of breath tests were selected, discussed and evaluated in a consensus-based manner by the Task Force members.Recommendations for standardisation of sampling, analysing and reporting of data and suggestions for research to cover gaps in the evidence have been created and summarised.Application of breath biomarker measurement in a standardised manner will provide comparable results, thereby facilitating the potential use of these biomarkers in clinical practice.

Status of selected ion flow tube MS: accomplishments and challenges in breath analysis and other areas

This article reflects our observations of recent accomplishments made using selected ion flow tube MS (SIFT-MS). Only brief descriptions are given of SIFT-MS as an analytical method and of the recent extensions to the underpinning analytical ion chemistry required to realize more robust analyses. The challenge of breath analysis is given special attention because, when achieved, it renders analysis of other air media relatively straightforward. Brief overviews are given of recent SIFT-MS breath analyses by leading research groups, noting the desirability of detection and quantification of single volatile biomarkers rather than reliance on statistical analyses, if breath analysis is to be accepted into clinical practice. A 'strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats' analysis of SIFT-MS is made, which should help to increase its utility for trace gas analysis.

Pitfalls in the analysis of volatile breath biomarkers: suggested solutions and SIFT-MS quantification of single metabolites

The experimental challenges presented by the analysis of trace volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath with the objective of identifying reliable biomarkers are brought into focus. It is stressed that positive identification and accurate quantification of the VOCs are imperative if they are to be considered as discreet biomarkers. Breath sampling procedures are discussed and it is suggested that for accurate quantification on-line real time sampling and analysis is desirable. Whilst recognizing such real time analysis is not always possible and sample collection is often required, objective recognition of the pitfalls involved in this is essential. It is also emphasized that mouth-exhaled breath is always contaminated to some degree by orally generated compounds and so, when possible, analysis of nose-exhaled breath should be performed. Some difficulties in breath analysis are mitigated by the choice of analytical instrumentation used, but no single instrument can provide solutions to all the analytical challenges. Analysis and interpretation of breath analysis data, however acquired, needs to be treated circumspectly. In particular, the excessive use of statistics to treat imperfect mass spectrometry/mobility spectra should be avoided, since it can result in unjustifiable conclusions. It is should be understood that recognition of combinations of VOCs in breath that, for example, apparently describe particular cancer states, will not be taken seriously until they are replicated in other laboratories and clinics. Finally, the inhibiting notion that single biomarkers of infection and disease will not be identified and utilized clinically should be dispelled by the exemplary and widely used single biomarkers NO and H2 and now, as indicated by recent selected ion flow tube mass spectroscopy (SIFT-MS) results, triatomic hydrogen cyanide and perhaps pentane and acetic acid. Hopefully, these discoveries will provide encouragement to research workers to be more open-minded on this important and desirable issue.

Alveolar and exhaled NO in relation to asthma characteristics--effects of correction for axial diffusion

BACKGROUND

Inflammation in the small airways might contribute to incomplete asthma disease control despite intensive treatment in some subgroups of patients. Exhaled NO (FeNO) is a marker of inflammation in asthma and the estimated NO contribution from small airways (CalvNO ) is believed to reflect distal inflammation. Recent studies recommend adjustments of CalvNO for trumpet model and axial diffusion (TMAD-adj). This study aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of CalvNO , both TMAD-adjusted and unadjusted.

METHODS

Asthma symptoms, asthma control, lung function, bronchial responsiveness, blood eosinophils, atopy and treatment level were assessed in 410 subjects, aged 10-35 years. Exhaled NO was measured at different flow-rates and CalvNO calculated, with TMAD-adjustment according to Condorelli.

RESULTS

Trumpet model and axial diffusion-adjusted CalvNO was not related to daytime wheeze (P = 0.27), FEF50 (P = 0.23) or bronchial responsiveness (P = 0.52). On the other hand, unadjusted CalvNO was increased in subjects with daytime wheeze (P < 0.001), decreased FEF50 (P = 0.02) and with moderate-to-severe compared to normal bronchial responsiveness (P < 0.001). All these characteristics correlated with increased FeNO (all P < 0.05). Unadjusted CalvNO was positively related to bronchial NO flux (J'awNO ) (r = 0.22, P < 0.001) while TMAD-adjCalvNO was negatively related to J'awNO (r = -0.38, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted CalvNO was not associated with any asthma characteristics studied in this large asthma cohort. However, both FeNO and unadjusted CalvNO related to asthma symptoms, lung function and bronchial responsiveness. We suggest a potential overadjustment by current TMAD-corrections, validated in healthy or unobstructed asthmatics. Further studies assessing axial diffusion in asthmatics with different degrees of airway obstruction and the validity of proposed TMAD-corrections are warranted.

Elevated exhaled nitric oxide in allergen-provoked asthma is associated with airway epithelial iNOS

Background

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide is elevated in allergen-provoked asthma. The cellular and molecular source of the elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide is, however, uncertain.

Objective

To investigate whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide is associated with increased airway epithelial inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in allergen-provoked asthma.

Methods

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide was measured in healthy controls (n = 14) and allergic asthmatics (n = 12), before and after bronchial provocation to birch pollen out of season. Bronchoscopy was performed before and 24 hours after allergen provocation. Bronchial biopsies and brush biopsies were processed for nitric oxide synthase activity staining with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase (NADPH-d), iNOS immunostaining, or gene expression analysis of iNOS by real-time PCR. NADPH-d and iNOS staining were quantified using automated morphometric analysis.

Results

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide and expression of iNOS mRNA were significantly higher in un-provoked asthmatics, compared to healthy controls. Allergic asthmatics exhibited a significant elevation of fractional exhaled nitric oxide after allergen provocation, as well as an accumulation of airway eosinophils. Moreover, nitric oxide synthase activity and expression of iNOS was significantly increased in the bronchial epithelium of asthmatics following allergen provocation. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide correlated with eosinophils and iNOS expression.

Conclusion

Higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration among asthmatics is associated with elevated iNOS mRNA in the bronchial epithelium. Furthermore, our data demonstrates for the first time increased expression and activity of iNOS in the bronchial epithelium after allergen provocation, and thus provide a mechanistic explanation for elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide in allergen-provoked asthma.