1
|
Nham E, Noh JY, Park O, Choi WS, Song JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ. COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies in the Endemic Period: Lessons from Influenza. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:514. [PMID: 38793765 PMCID: PMC11125835 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious zoonotic respiratory disease with many similarities to influenza. Effective vaccines are available for both; however, rapid viral evolution and waning immunity make them virtually impossible to eradicate with vaccines. Thus, the practical goal of vaccination is to reduce the incidence of serious illnesses and death. Three years after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, the optimal vaccination strategy in the endemic period remains elusive, and health authorities worldwide have begun to adopt various approaches. Herein, we propose a COVID-19 vaccination strategy based on the data available until early 2024 and discuss aspects that require further clarification for better decision making. Drawing from comparisons between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination strategies, our proposed COVID-19 vaccination strategy prioritizes high-risk groups, emphasizes seasonal administration aligned with influenza vaccination campaigns, and advocates the co-administration with influenza vaccines to increase coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliel Nham
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yun Noh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Ok Park
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Suk Choi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Young Song
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Jin Cheong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Joo Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea; (E.N.); (J.Y.N.); (O.P.); (W.S.C.); (J.Y.S.); (H.J.C.)
- Vaccine Innovation Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gastesi Orbegozo I, Cea-Soriano L, Llorente A, Huerta-Álvarez C. Lack of association between COVID-19 vaccines and miscarriage onset using a case-crossover design. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7275. [PMID: 38538736 PMCID: PMC10973422 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57880-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women might have an increased risk of SARS-COV-2 infection. Although evidence towards the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 is growing still there is room for improvement on the knowledge towards pregnancy adverse events, such as miscarriage. We explored the association of COVID-19 vaccine with the risk of miscarriages using the Real-World. We identified a cohort of vaccinated pregnancies using the BIFAP database which contains systematically recorded data on care patients in Spain (N = 4054). We then restricted it to those women who had a miscarriage using a validated algorithm (N = 607). Among them, we performed a case-crossover design to evaluate the effect of intermittent exposures on the risk of miscarriage. Adjusted Odds Ratio with their confidence intervals were calculated using two analytical approaches: conditional logistic regression and Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models. A total of 225 (37.1%) were aged 35-39 years. The most common comorbidities were asthma, migraine, gastritis, and hypothyroidism. A total of 14.7% received only one dose of COVID-19 and 85.3% two doses, respectively. A total of 36.8% of women with one dose and 27.6% with two doses received the vaccine 7 days prior to the miscarriage. Corresponding adjusted estimates for the risk of miscarriage using the conditional logistic regression where as follows: 1.65 (95% CI 0.85-3.23) when using as the sum of 3 control moments among women with one dose, 1.02 (95% CI 0.72-1.46) among women with two doses and 1.03 (95% CI 0.72, 1.46) using the whole study population. Very similar results were obtained when conducting the Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models. There was no overall increased risk of miscarriage onset associated with COVID-19 vaccine although contradictory results were found according to the number of doses. Further studies are required with larger sample sizes to assess this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irati Gastesi Orbegozo
- Biomedical Research Foundation Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucía Cea-Soriano
- Department of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza. Ramón y Cajal, s/n. Ciudad Universitaria, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ana Llorente
- BIFAP, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Consuelo Huerta-Álvarez
- Department of Public Health and Maternal Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Pza. Ramón y Cajal, s/n. Ciudad Universitaria, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dieussaert I, Hyung Kim J, Luik S, Seidl C, Pu W, Stegmann JU, Swamy GK, Webster P, Dormitzer PR. RSV Prefusion F Protein-Based Maternal Vaccine - Preterm Birth and Other Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1009-1021. [PMID: 38477988 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2305478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) during pregnancy may protect infants from RSV disease. Efficacy and safety data on a candidate RSV prefusion F protein-based maternal vaccine (RSVPreF3-Mat) are needed. METHODS We conducted a phase 3 trial involving pregnant women 18 to 49 years of age to assess the efficacy and safety of RSVPreF3-Mat. The women were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive RSVPreF3-Mat or placebo between 24 weeks 0 days and 34 weeks 0 days of gestation. The primary outcomes were any or severe medically assessed RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in infants from birth to 6 months of age and safety in infants from birth to 12 months of age. After the observation of a higher risk of preterm birth in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, enrollment and vaccination were stopped early, and exploratory analyses of the safety signal of preterm birth were performed. RESULTS The analyses included 5328 pregnant women and 5233 infants; the target enrollment of approximately 10,000 pregnant women and their infants was not reached because enrollment was stopped early. A total of 3426 infants in the vaccine group and 1711 infants in the placebo group were followed from birth to 6 months of age; 16 and 24 infants, respectively, had any medically assessed RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (vaccine efficacy, 65.5%; 95% credible interval, 37.5 to 82.0), and 8 and 14, respectively, had severe medically assessed RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (vaccine efficacy, 69.0%; 95% credible interval, 33.0 to 87.6). Preterm birth occurred in 6.8% of the infants (237 of 3494) in the vaccine group and in 4.9% of those (86 of 1739) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.74; P = 0.01); neonatal death occurred in 0.4% (13 of 3494) and 0.2% (3 of 1739), respectively (relative risk, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.62 to 7.56; P = 0.23), an imbalance probably attributable to the greater percentage of preterm births in the vaccine group. No other safety signal was observed. CONCLUSIONS The results of this trial, in which enrollment was stopped early because of safety concerns, suggest that the risks of any and severe medically assessed RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease among infants were lower with the candidate maternal RSV vaccine than with placebo but that the risk of preterm birth was higher with the candidate vaccine. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04605159.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse Dieussaert
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Joon Hyung Kim
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Sabine Luik
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Claudia Seidl
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Wenji Pu
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Jens-Ulrich Stegmann
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Peggy Webster
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| | - Philip R Dormitzer
- From GSK, Wavre, Belgium (I.D., J.-U.S.); GSK, Rockville, MD (J.H.K., W.P.); GSK, Munich, Germany (S.L., C.S.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.K.S.); and GSK, Waltham, MA (P.W., P.R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hatami D, Habibelahi A, Changizi N, Heidarzadeh M, Nojomi M, Rast M, Ansari K, Tehrani-Banihashemi A. Perinatal outcomes and sinopharm BBIBP-CorV vaccination during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:190. [PMID: 38468216 PMCID: PMC10926583 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06389-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the outbreak of COVID-19, a huge part of the health care services was dedicated to preventing and treating this disease. In case of COVID-19 infection, severe COVID-19 is reported more in pregnant individuals. Afterward, Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 became a hot topic due to known effects in preventing severe COVID-19 during pregnancy. Vaccination of pregnant individuals started in August 2021 with the Sinopharm vaccine in Iran. The aim of current study was to determine the incidence of perinatal outcomes in women who were vaccinated during pregnancy. METHOD This retrospective cohort study included 129,488 singleton births from March 21, 2021, until March 21, 2022, in Tehran, Iran. The data was obtained from the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal (IMaN) Network and the Maternal Vaccination Registry. Adverse perinatal outcomes investigated in this study include preterm birth, extremely preterm birth, low birth weight, very low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, congenital anomaly, neonatal death and low 5-minute Apgar score. The risk of all perinatal outcomes was evaluated using multiple logistic regression. The analysis was done using STATA version 14. RESULTS Of all 129,488 singleton births included in this study, 17,485 (13.5%) were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (all with Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV)). The exposure to the Sinopharm vaccine during pregnancy caused a significant decrease in the incidence of preterm birth (P =0.006, OR=0.91 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.97]), extremely preterm birth (P =<0.001,OR=0.55 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.66]), and stillbirth (P =<0.001, OR=0.60 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.76]). Exposure to vaccination during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (P =0.01, OR=1.27 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.55]) Maternal vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of other adverse perinatal outcomes included in this study. CONCLUSION The finding of this population-based study indicated no adverse pregnancy outcome due to vaccination with the Sinopharm vaccine during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Overall risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes were lower in the vaccinated individuals compared to the unvaccinated group. Also, vaccination during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donya Hatami
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Habibelahi
- Neonatal Health Office, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nasrin Changizi
- Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Heidarzadeh
- Department of Neonatology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
| | - Marzieh Nojomi
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Moein Rast
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kiarash Ansari
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arash Tehrani-Banihashemi
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mand N, Rüdiger M, Hütten M, Maier RF, Mense L, Pecks U. Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 - data from the German COVID-19 related obstetric and neonatal outcome study (CRONOS). J Perinat Med 2024; 52:202-209. [PMID: 38175139 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in newborns born to mothers with peripartum SARS-CoV-2 infection in a German cohort, to identify potential risk factors associated with neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to present short-term outcomes of newborns with vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS Data on women with SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring anytime during their pregnancy was gathered prospectively within the CRONOS registry. From April 2020 to February 2023 a total of 8,540 women had been registered. The timing and the probability of mother-to-child transmission in neonates born to women with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection were classified using the WHO classification system. The severity of maternal infection, maternal vaccination status, type of dominant virus, and perinatal outcome parameters were analyzed as potential risk factors for neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS 6.3 % resp. 42.9 % of tested newborns and stillbirths were SARS-CoV-2 positive. 2.1 % of newborns with confirmed and possible SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. Severe maternal COVID-19 (odds ratio 4.4, 95 % confidence interval 1.8-11.1) and maternal infection with the Delta virus (OR 3.2, 1.4-7.7) were associated with neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Newborns with a confirmed or possible infection were significantly more often admitted to the NICU (65.2 % neonatal infection vs. 27.5 % non, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The rate of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 positivity was higher in our cohort than previously reported, neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections were rare. Our data emphasizes confirmative testing should be performed in newborns of SARS-CoV-2 infected mothers to identify neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection as an underlying pathology leading to NICU admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Mand
- Department of Pediatrics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Mario Rüdiger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Hütten
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rolf Felix Maier
- Department of Pediatrics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lars Mense
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Pecks
- Department of Obstetrics, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barros FC, Gunier RB, Rego A, Sentilhes L, Rauch S, Gandino S, Teji JS, Thornton JG, Kachikis AB, Nieto R, Craik R, Cavoretto PI, Winsey A, Roggero P, Rodriguez GB, Savasi V, Kalafat E, Giuliani F, Fabre M, Benski AC, Coronado-Zarco IA, Livio S, Ostrovska A, Maiz N, Castedo Camacho FR, Peterson A, Deruelle P, Giudice C, Casale RA, Salomon LJ, Soto Conti CP, Prefumo F, Mohamed Elbayoumy EZ, Vale M, Hernández V, Chandler K, Risso M, Marler E, Cáceres DM, Crespo GA, Ernawati E, Lipschuetz M, Ariff S, Takahashi K, Vecchiarelli C, Hubka T, Ikenoue S, Tavchioska G, Bako B, Ayede AI, Eskenazi B, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Papageorghiou AT, Villar J. Maternal vaccination against COVID-19 and neonatal outcomes during Omicron: INTERCOVID-2022 study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00078-4. [PMID: 38367758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early 2023, when Omicron was the variant of concern, we showed that vaccinating pregnant women decreased the risk for severe COVID-19-related complications and maternal morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on newborns and the effects of maternal COVID-19 vaccination on neonatal outcomes when Omicron was the variant of concern. STUDY DESIGN INTERCOVID-2022 was a large, prospective, observational study, conducted in 40 hospitals across 18 countries, from November 27, 2021 (the day after the World Health Organization declared Omicron the variant of concern) to June 30, 2022, to assess the effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes and to assess vaccine effectiveness. Women diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy were compared with 2 nondiagnosed, unmatched women recruited concomitantly and consecutively during pregnancy or at delivery. Mother-newborn dyads were followed until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were a neonatal positive test for COVID-19, severe neonatal morbidity index, severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index, preterm birth, neonatal death, referral to neonatal intensive care unit, and diseases during the neonatal period. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with adjustment for maternal risk profile. RESULTS We enrolled 4707 neonates born to 1577 (33.5%) mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and 3130 (66.5%) nondiagnosed mothers. Among the diagnosed mothers, 642 (40.7%) were not vaccinated, 147 (9.3%) were partially vaccinated, 551 (34.9%) were completely vaccinated, and 237 (15.0%) also had a booster vaccine. Neonates of booster-vaccinated mothers had less than half (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.91) the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 when compared with those of unvaccinated mothers; they also had the lowest rates of preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, respiratory distress syndrome, and number of days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborns of unvaccinated mothers had double the risk for neonatal death (relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.00) when compared with those of nondiagnosed mothers. Vaccination was not associated with any congenital malformations. Although all vaccines provided protection against neonatal test positivity, newborns of booster-vaccinated mothers had the highest vaccine effectiveness (64%; 95% confidence interval, 10%-86%). Vaccine effectiveness was not as high for messenger RNA vaccines only. Vaccine effectiveness against moderate or severe neonatal outcomes was much lower, namely 13% in the booster-vaccinated group (all vaccines) and 25% and 28% in the completely and booster-vaccinated groups, respectively (messenger RNA vaccines only). Vaccines were fairly effective in protecting neonates when given to pregnant women ≤100 days (14 weeks) before birth; thereafter, the risk increased and was much higher after 200 days (29 weeks). Finally, none of the neonatal practices studied, including skin-to-skin contact and direct breastfeeding, increased the risk for infecting newborns. CONCLUSION When Omicron was the variant of concern, newborns of unvaccinated mothers had an increased risk for neonatal death. Neonates of vaccinated mothers had a decreased risk for preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Because the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination decreases with time, to ensure that newborns are maximally protected against COVID-19, mothers should receive a vaccine or booster dose no more than 14 weeks before the expected date of delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando C Barros
- Post Graduate Program in Health in the Life Cycle, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - Robert B Gunier
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Albertina Rego
- Departamento de Pediatria, Faculdade Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Loïc Sentilhes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Stephen Rauch
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Serena Gandino
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jim G Thornton
- University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alisa B Kachikis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ricardo Nieto
- Division Neonatología, Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sarda, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rachel Craik
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo I Cavoretto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Adele Winsey
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paola Roggero
- Department of Woman, Child and Neonate, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriel B Rodriguez
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Valeria Savasi
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, L- Sacco Hospital ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy; Department of Biological and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Erkan Kalafat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Francesca Giuliani
- Neonatal Special Care Unit, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marta Fabre
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitario de Aragón (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Stefania Livio
- Hospital Buzzi, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Adela Ostrovska
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nerea Maiz
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Philippe Deruelle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Carolina Giudice
- Servicio de Neonatologia, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Roberto A Casale
- Maternal and Child Department, Hospital Nacional Profesor Alejandro Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Federico Prefumo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Marynéa Vale
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
| | | | | | - Milagros Risso
- Servicio de Neonatología del Departamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Emily Marler
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Ernawati Ernawati
- Medical Faculty Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Michal Lipschuetz
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shabina Ariff
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Teresa Hubka
- AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Satoru Ikenoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Babagana Bako
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medical Sciences, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria
| | | | - Brenda Eskenazi
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Center for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephen H Kennedy
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Aris T Papageorghiou
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Jose Villar
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kleinwechter HJ, Weber KS, Liedtke TP, Schäfer-Graf U, Groten T, Rüdiger M, Pecks U. COVID-19, Pregnancy, and Diabetes Mellitus. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2024; 228:17-31. [PMID: 37918833 DOI: 10.1055/a-2180-7715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
During the severe acute respiratory distress virus coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, many women were infected during their pregnancies. The SARS-CoV-2-induced coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has an impact on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes; peripartum and perinatal morbidity and mortality are increased. Pregnancy is considered a risk factor for severe COVID-19 course. Additional risk factors during pregnancy are diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and obesity. Systemic inflammation can lead to severe metabolic dysregulation with ketoacidosis. The endocrine pancreas is a target organ for SARS-CoV-2 and the fetal risk depends on inflammation of the placenta. Up to now there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy leads to permanent diabetes in mothers or their offspring via triggering autoimmunity or beta cell destruction. The frequently observed increased prevalence of GDM compared to the years before the pandemic is most likely due to changed lifestyle during lockdown. Furthermore, severe COVID-19 may be associated with the development of GDM due to worsening of glucose tolerance. Vaccination with a mRNA vaccine is safe and highly effective to prevent infection and to reduce hospitalization. Registries support offering evidence-based recommendations on vaccination for pregnant women. Even with the current omicron virus variant, there are increased risks for symptomatic and unvaccinated pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ute Schäfer-Graf
- Department of Obstetrics, Berlin Diabetes Center for Pregnant Women, St. Joseph Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Groten
- Department of Obstetrics, Competence Center for Diabetic Women, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Mario Rüdiger
- Saxony Center for Fetal-Neonatal Health, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Pecks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Maternal Health and Midwifery Science, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang J, Deng Y, Wang W. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2024:trad093. [PMID: 38291854 DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to estimate the associations between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination during pregnancy and the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes. We performed a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase to identify eligible studies published up to 24 September 2023, yielding 39 included studies. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a random effects model. The pooled results showed that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy (any type or dose of COVID-19 vaccination during any trimester) was not associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. In particular, COVID-19 vaccination in the third trimester was associated with a decreased risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.98]), 5-min Apgar <7 (RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.78 to 0.97]) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.90 [95% CI 0.86 to 0.95]). The inverse associations were also found in analysis of one-dose vaccination during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.96]) and preterm birth (<37 weeks) (RR 0.90 [95% CI 0.80 to 1.00]) and two-dose vaccination during pregnancy and the risk of NICU admission (RR 0.86 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.96]). COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy does not increase the risk of negative outcomes for the mother or baby.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Wang
- Public Health Department, Weihai Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong, China
| | - Yuzhi Deng
- Public Health Department, Weihai Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong, China
| | - Weijing Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Public Health College, Qingdao University, No. 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liedtke TP, Weber KS, Adamczewski H, Weber D, Ramsauer B, Schaefer-Graf UM, Groten T, Strathmann EA, Lieb W, Rüdiger M, Pecks U, Kleinwechter HJ. Adverse perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy: results from two nationwide registries in Germany. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2024; 12:e003724. [PMID: 38272538 PMCID: PMC10823927 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregnancy is a known independent risk factor for a severe course of COVID-19. The relationship of SARS-CoV-2 infection and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on neonatal outcomes is unclear. Our aim was to determine if SARS-CoV-2 infection represents an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancy with GDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We compared data from two German registries including pregnant women with GDM, established during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS), a multicenter prospective observational study) and already existing before the pandemic (German registry of pregnant women with GDM; GestDiab). In total, 409 participants with GDM and SARS-CoV-2 infection and 4598 participants with GDM, registered 2018-2019, were eligible for analyses. The primary fetal and neonatal outcomes were defined as: (1) combined: admission to neonatal intensive care unit, stillbirth, and/or neonatal death, and (2) preterm birth before 37+0 weeks of gestation. Large and small for gestational age, maternal insulin therapy, birth weight >4500 g and cesarean delivery were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were younger (32 vs 33 years) and had a higher median body mass index (28 vs 27 kg/m²). In CRONOS, more neonates developed the primary outcome (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.97) and were born preterm (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.10). Fasting glucose was higher in women in CRONOS versus GestDiab (5.4 vs 5.3 mmol/L) considering each 0.1 mmol/L increase was independently associated with a 5% higher risk of preterm birth among women in CRONOS only (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09). CONCLUSIONS GDM with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes as compared with GDM without SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dietmar Weber
- Scientific Institute of Diabetologists in Practice, Kaarst, Germany
| | - Babett Ramsauer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute M Schaefer-Graf
- Department of Obstetrics, Berlin Diabetes Center for Pregnant Women, St. Joseph Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Groten
- Department of Obstetrics, Competence Center for Diabetic Women, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Lieb
- Institute for Epidemiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Mario Rüdiger
- Saxony Center for Fetal-Neonatal Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Pecks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- Maternal Health and Midwifery Science, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rahmati M, Yon DK, Lee SW, Butler L, Koyanagi A, Jacob L, Shin JI, Smith L. Reply to Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit on 'Effects of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection and maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Rev Med Virol 2024; 34:e2490. [PMID: 37975713 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud Rahmati
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Dong Keon Yon
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Won Lee
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Laurie Butler
- Centre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Louis Jacob
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Jae Il Shin
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Lee Smith
- Centre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xiao H, Chen C, Huang S, Zhang W, Cai S, Hou X, Luo Y, Lin Y. Effects of novel coronavirus Omicron variant infection on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from Guangzhou. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1256080. [PMID: 38170092 PMCID: PMC10759226 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1256080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Since 2022, Omicron has been circulating in China as a major variant of the novel coronavirus, but the effects of infection with Omicron variants on pregnant women and newborns are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical characteristics of Omicron infection during pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcomes. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 93 confirmed cases of novel coronavirus infection and 109 non-infected patients admitted to the isolation ward of Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from December 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023, and statistically analyzed the clinical features of Omicron variant infection during pregnancy and its impact on pregnancy outcomes. Further effects of underlying diseases on Omicron infection in pregnant women were analyzed. Results The incubation period of COVID-19 infection was 0.99±0.86 days, 94.38% of patients had fever or other respiratory symptoms, the lymphocyte count in the infected group was lower than that in the uninfected group, and the lymphocyte count was further reduced in the patients with pregnancy complications or complications. Compared with the uninfected group, APTT and PT were prolonged, platelet count and fibrinogen were decreased in the infected group, all of which had statistical significance. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy increased the rate of cesarean section compared to uninfected pregnant patients, and COVID-19 infection in gestational diabetes resulted in a 4.19-fold increase in cesarean section rate. There was no statistically significant difference in gestational age between the two groups. The incidence of intrauterine distress, turbidity of amniotic fluid and neonatal respiratory distress were higher in the infection group. No positive cases of neonatal COVID-19 infection have been found. Conclusion The patients infected with omicron during pregnancy often have febrile respiratory symptoms with lymphocyopenia, but the incidence of severe disease is low. Both Omicron infection and gestational diabetes further increase the incidence of cesarean section, and this study found no evidence of vertical transmission of Omicron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanshun Xiao
- Department of MICU, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Baiyun Branch of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shan Huang
- Department of MICU, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenni Zhang
- Department of MICU, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuangming Cai
- Department of MICU, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangling Hou
- Faculty of Science and Technology, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai, China
| | - Yiping Luo
- Department of MICU, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Baiyun Branch of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yussuph ZH, Alwy Al-Beity FM, August F, Anaeli A. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women attending public antenatal clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2269777. [PMID: 37942618 PMCID: PMC10653711 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2269777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed over six million lives and caused significant morbidities globally. The development and use of COVID-19 vaccines is a key strategy in ending this. There is a general public hesitancy on vaccine uptake, including pregnant women who are at high risk of severe forms of the disease and death when infected with the virus. To determine the magnitude of hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines and the associated factors among pregnant women attending public antenatal clinics in Dar es Salaam. This was a cross-sectional analytical study conducted among 896 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at public health facilities in Dar es Salaam. A structured interviewer-based questionnaire, in an electronic form, was used. The analysis was done by a multivariable linear regression model using STATA 16 to obtain factors associated with vaccine hesitancy, and P < .05 was considered significant. The proportion of pregnant women with vaccine hesitancy was 45%. Hesitancy was higher among unemployed pregnant women (AOR 2.16 (95% CI 1.36-3.42) and the self-employed group (AOR 1.62 (95% CI 1.07-2.44). It was also higher among pregnant women with poor attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines (AOR 2.44 (95% CI 1.75-3.39) and women who had low perceived benefits of the vaccines (AOR 2.57 (95% CI 1.83-3.60). COVID-19 vaccine-targeted interventions should aim at the provision of knowledge on COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine and address poor attitudes and perceptions that pregnant women have on these vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab Hassan Yussuph
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Fadhlun M. Alwy Al-Beity
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Furaha August
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Amani Anaeli
- Department of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tudisco R, Garufi C, Rizzo F, Polimeno T, Lanzone A, De Carolis S. Impact of mRNA-based vaccines in the prevention of adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy: a single-center cohort study. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1214768. [PMID: 37941978 PMCID: PMC10628479 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1214768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Several data have suggested that pregnant women have an increased risk of severe COVID-19 compared to those who are not pregnant. Moreover, different studies have showed that severe COVID-19 is limited mostly to unvaccinated women. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the different maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 according to their vaccination status. A retrospective cohort study was carried out including all women admitted to the high-risk pregnancy unit of our center with COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2022. Among the 163 women included in the study, 60 were vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine and 103 were unvaccinated. Pregnancy outcome and obstetrical and neonatal complications were encountered. Vaccinated women showed higher educational levels and lower prevalence of cases, with BMI >25 compared to unvaccinated women. Moreover, vaccinated women were admitted mostly for obstetrical indications rather than for COVID-related symptoms. In addition, the risk of developing COVID-19 pneumonia was significantly higher in unvaccinated women (p = 0.01) compared with vaccinated ones. Furthermore, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes showed some differences in the two cohorts. In unvaccinated women, the rate of C-section was higher (p = 0.03), and the mean birthweight percentile in their infants was impaired by COVID-19 infection (p = 0.01) when compared to those born to vaccinated women. Based on these results, we suggest that women who received a full course of vaccination were protected from the severity of the disease, having milder symptoms of SARS-Cov2 infection, while also presenting a more favorable pregnancy outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Tudisco
- Dipartimento Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Garufi
- Arthritis Center, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Rizzo
- Dipartimento Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Polimeno
- Dipartimento Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Lanzone
- Dipartimento Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara De Carolis
- Dipartimento Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kleebayoon A, Wiwanitkit V. Comment on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, COVID and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Rev Med Virol 2023; 33:e2448. [PMID: 37056172 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Viroj Wiwanitkit
- Chandigarh University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
- Joesph Ayobabalola University, Ikeji-Arakeji, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Komine-Aizawa S, Yamada N, Haruyama Y, Deguchi M, Fukuda M, Kawana K, Kobashi G, Miyagi E, Yamada H, Sugiyama T, Hayakawa S. The Factors Influencing Pregnant Women's Selection of Media Sources to Obtain Information on COVID-19 in Japan in 2021. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040805. [PMID: 37112717 PMCID: PMC10143418 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women presumably gather information about the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from various sources. However, it is difficult for pregnant women who are not medical professionals to source the appropriate information because of the infodemic related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate how pregnant women gathered information about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination. To address this issue, we conducted an online questionnaire survey between 5 October and 22 November 2021, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nihon University School of Medicine. We received 4962 responses after excluding 1179 insufficient answers. Our study found that age, occupation, and infection-risk anxiety influenced the selection of media for obtaining information. Pregnant women who were older, medical professionals, public servants, or educators tended to rely on specialized medical websites, whereas housewives tended to use mass media, social media, and sources with uncertain scientific evidence. Additionally, the number of weeks of gestation and the method of conception (natural or assisted reproductive conception) affected the selection of media. The accessibility of COVID-19 information for pregnant women was determined by their social background and pregnancy status. We need to continue making efforts to ensure that appropriate information is readily available to pregnant women and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shihoko Komine-Aizawa
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan
| | - Naotake Yamada
- Institute of Journalism and Media, Nihon University, Tokyo 101-8375, Japan
| | - Yasuo Haruyama
- Integrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Sciences, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
| | - Masashi Deguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Fukuda
- College of Risk Management, Nihon University, Tokyo 154-8513, Japan
| | - Kei Kawana
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan
| | - Gen Kobashi
- Department of Public Health, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
| | - Etsuko Miyagi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
| | - Hideto Yamada
- Center for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan
| | - Takashi Sugiyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon 791-0295, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hayakawa
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan
| |
Collapse
|