Amygdaloid D1 receptors are not linked to stimulation of adenylate cyclase

Characterization of behavioral changes in T-maze alternation from dopamine D1 agonists with different receptor coupling mechanisms

RATIONALE

Dopamine D1 receptor agonists have been shown to improve working memory, but often have a non-monotonic (inverted-U) dose-response curve. One hypothesis is that this may reflect dose-dependent differential engagement of D1 signaling pathways, a mechanism termed functional selectivity or signaling bias.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

To test this hypothesis, we compared two D1 ligands with different signaling biases in a rodent T-maze alternation task. Both tested ligands (2-methyldihydrexidine and CY208243) have high intrinsic activity at cAMP signaling, but the former also has markedly higher intrinsic activity at D1-mediated recruitment of β-arrestin. The spatial working memory was assessed via the alternation behavior in the T-maze where the alternate choice rate quantified the quality of the memory and the duration prior to making a choice represented the decision latency.

RESULTS

Both D1 drugs changed the alternate rate and the choice latency in a dose-dependent manner, albeit with important differences. 2-Methyldihydrexidine was somewhat less potent but caused a more homogeneous improvement than CY208243 in spatial working memory. The maximum changes in the alternate rate and the choice latency tended to occur at different doses for both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that D1 signaling bias in these two pathways (cAMP vs β-arrestin) has complex effects on cognitive processes as assessed by T-maze alternation. Understanding these mechanisms should allow the identification or discovery of D1 agonists that can provide superior cognitive enhancement.

SKF83959, an agonist of phosphatidylinositol-linked dopamine receptors, prevents renewal of extinguished conditioned fear and facilitates extinction

Fear-related anxiety disorders, such as social phobia and post-traumatic stress disorder, are partly explained by an uncontrollable state of fear. An emerging literature suggests dopamine receptor-1 (D₁ receptor) in the amygdala is involved in the regulation of fear memory. An early study has reported that amygdaloid D₁ receptor (D₁R) is not coupled to the classic cAMP-dependent signal transduction. Here, we investigated whether SKF83959, a typical D₁R agonist that mainly activates a D₁-like receptor-dependent phosphatidylinositol (PI) signal pathway, facilitates fear extinction and reduces the return of extinguished fear. Interestingly, long-term loss of fearful memories can be induced through a combination of SKF83959 (1 mg/kg/day, i.p., once daily for one week) pharmacotherapy and extinction training. Furthermore, sub-chronic administration of SKF83959 after fear conditioning reduced fear renewal and reinstatement in the mice. We found that the activation D₁R and PI signaling in the amygdala was responsible for the effect of SKF83959 on fear extinction. Additionally, SKF83959 significantly promoted the elevation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression, possibly by the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) -directed gene transcription. Given the beneficial effects on extinction, SKF83959 may emerge as a candidate pharmacological approach for improving cognitive-behavioral therapy on fear-related anxiety disorders.

Neurochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying the retrieval-extinction effect

Extinction within the reconsolidation window, or 'retrieval-extinction', has received much research interest as a possible technique for targeting the reconsolidation of maladaptive memories with a behavioural intervention. However, it remains to be determined whether the retrieval-extinction effect-a long-term reduction in fear behaviour, which appears resistant to spontaneous recovery, renewal and reinstatement-depends specifically on destabilisation of the original memory (the 'reconsolidation-update' account) or represents facilitation of an extinction memory (the 'extinction-facilitation' account). We propose that comparing the neurotransmitter systems, receptors and intracellular signalling pathways recruited by reconsolidation, extinction and retrieval-extinction will provide a way of distinguishing between these accounts.

β-Adrenergic enhancement of neuronal excitability in the lateral amygdala is developmentally gated

Noradrenergic signaling in the amygdala is important for processing threats and other emotionally salient stimuli, and β-adrenergic receptor activation is known to enhance neuronal spiking in the lateral amygdala (LA) of juvenile animals. Nevertheless, intracellular recordings have not yet been conducted to determine the effect of β-adrenergic receptor activation on spike properties in the adult LA, despite the potential significance of developmental changes between adolescence and adulthood. Here we demonstrate that the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol (15 μM) enhances spike frequency in dorsal LA principal neurons of juvenile male C57BL/6 mice and fails to do so in strain- and sex-matched adults. Furthermore, we find that the age-dependent effect of isoproterenol on spike frequency is occluded by the GABA_A receptor blocker picrotoxin (75 μM), suggesting that β-adrenergic receptors downregulate tonic inhibition specifically in juvenile animals. These findings indicate a significant shift during adolescence in the cellular mechanisms of β-adrenergic modulation in the amygdala. NEW & NOTEWORTHY β-Adrenergic receptors (β-ARs) in amygdala are important in processing emotionally salient stimuli. Most cellular recordings have examined juvenile animals, while behavioral data are often obtained from adults. We replicate findings showing that β-ARs enhance spiking of principal cells in the lateral amygdala of juveniles, but we fail to find this in adults. These findings have notable scientific and clinical implications regarding the noradrenergic modulation of threat processing, alterations of which underlie fear and anxiety disorders.

Role of the basolateral amygdala dopamine receptors in arachidonylcyclopropylamide-induced fear learning deficits

There is much evidence suggesting that the mesoamygdala dopaminergic (DAergic) system plays a crucial role in the formation and expression of fear conditioning, with both D1 and D2 receptors being involved. In addition, cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) signaling modulates DAergic pathways. The present study sought to determine the involvement of basolateral amygdala (BLA) dopamine receptors in arachidonylcyclopropylamide (ACPA)-induced fear learning deficits. Context- and tone-dependent fear conditioning in adult male NMRI mice was evaluated. Pre-training intraperitoneal administration of ACPA (0.1 mg/kg) decreased the percentage of freezing in context- or tone-dependent fear conditioning, suggesting an acquisition impairment. Pre-training intra-BLA microinjection of a subthreshold dose of SKF38393 (D1-like receptor agonist), SCH23390 (D1-like receptor antagonist), quinpirole (D2-like receptor agonist), or sulpiride (D2-like receptor antagonist) did not alter the context-dependent fear learning deficit induced by ACPA, while SKF38393 or quinpirole restored ACPA effect on tone-dependent fear learning. Moreover, SKF38393 (1 μg/mouse), SCH23390 (0.04 and 0.08 μg/mouse), or quinpirole (0.1 μg/mouse) all impaired context-dependent fear learning. It is concluded that D1 or D2 dopamine (DA) receptor activation restores tone- but not context-dependent fear learning deficit induced by CB1 activation using ACPA.

Dopamine and extinction: a convergence of theory with fear and reward circuitry

Research on dopamine lies at the intersection of sophisticated theoretical and neurobiological approaches to learning and memory. Dopamine has been shown to be critical for many processes that drive learning and memory, including motivation, prediction error, incentive salience, memory consolidation, and response output. Theories of dopamine's function in these processes have, for the most part, been developed from behavioral approaches that examine learning mechanisms in reward-related tasks. A parallel and growing literature indicates that dopamine is involved in fear conditioning and extinction. These studies are consistent with long-standing ideas about appetitive-aversive interactions in learning theory and they speak to the general nature of cellular and molecular processes that underlie behavior. We review the behavioral and neurobiological literature showing a role for dopamine in fear conditioning and extinction. At a cellular level, we review dopamine signaling and receptor pharmacology, cellular and molecular events that follow dopamine receptor activation, and brain systems in which dopamine functions. At a behavioral level, we describe theories of learning and dopamine function that could describe the fundamental rules underlying how dopamine modulates different aspects of learning and memory processes.

Redundant catecholamine signaling consolidates fear memory via phospholipase C

Memories for emotionally arousing experiences are typically vivid and persistent. The recurrent, intrusive memories of traumatic events in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are an extreme example. Stress-responsive neurotransmitters released during emotional arousal are proposed to enhance the consolidation of fear memory. These transmitters may include norepinephrine and epinephrine (NE/E) because stimulating β-adrenergic receptors shortly after training can enhance memory consolidation. However, mice lacking NE/E acquire and consolidate fear memory normally. Here, we show by using pharmacologic and genetic manipulations in mice and rats that NE/E are not essential for classical fear memory consolidation because signaling by the β(2)-adrenergic receptor is redundant with signaling by dopamine at the D(5)-dopaminergic receptor. The intracellular signaling that is stimulated by these receptors to promote consolidation uses distinct G proteins to redundantly activate phospholipase C. The results support recent evidence indicating that blocking β-adrenergic receptors alone shortly after trauma may not be sufficient to prevent PTSD.

Molecular mechanisms of fear learning and memory

Pavlovian fear conditioning is a particularly useful behavioral paradigm for exploring the molecular mechanisms of learning and memory because a well-defined response to a specific environmental stimulus is produced through associative learning processes. Synaptic plasticity in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) underlies this form of associative learning. Here, we summarize the molecular mechanisms that contribute to this synaptic plasticity in the context of auditory fear conditioning, the form of fear conditioning best understood at the molecular level. We discuss the neurotransmitter systems and signaling cascades that contribute to three phases of auditory fear conditioning: acquisition, consolidation, and reconsolidation. These studies suggest that multiple intracellular signaling pathways, including those triggered by activation of Hebbian processes and neuromodulatory receptors, interact to produce neural plasticity in the LA and behavioral fear conditioning. Collectively, this body of research illustrates the power of fear conditioning as a model system for characterizing the mechanisms of learning and memory in mammals and potentially for understanding fear-related disorders, such as PTSD and phobias.

Dopamine attenuates evoked inhibitory synaptic currents in central amygdala neurons

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) plays a critical role in regulating the behavioral, autonomic and endocrine response to stress. Dopamine (DA) participates in mediating the stress response and DA release is enhanced in the CeA during stressful events. However, the electrophysiological effects of DA on CeA neurons have not yet been characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the effect of DA application on electrophysiological responses of CeA neurons in coronal brain sections of male Sprague-Dawley rats. We used whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiological techniques to record evoked synaptic responses and to determine basic membrane properties of CeA neurons both before and after DA superfusion. DA (20-250 μM) did not significantly alter membrane conductance over the voltage range tested. However, DA significantly reduced the peak amplitude of evoked inhibitory synaptic currents in CeA neurons. Pretreatment with the D(2) receptor antagonist eticlopride failed to significantly block the inhibitory effects of DA. In contrast, pretreatment with the D(1) receptor antagonist SCH-23390 significantly reduced the effects of DA on evoked inhibitory neurotransmission in these neurons. Moreover, bath superfusion of the specific D(1) receptor agonist SKF-39393, but not the D(2) receptor agonist quinpirole, significantly reduced peak amplitude of evoked inhibitory synaptic events. DA reduced the frequency of miniature IPSCs without altering the amplitude, while having no effect on the amplitude of IPSCs elicited by pressure application of GABA. These results suggest that DA may modulate inhibitory synaptic transmission in CeA through D(1) receptor activation primarily by a presynaptic mechanism.

Stimulation of dopamine D2/D3 but not D1 receptors in the central amygdala decreases cocaine-seeking behavior

Alterations in dopamine output within the various subnuclei of the amygdala have previously been implicated in cocaine reinforcement, as well as cocaine-seeking behavior. To elucidate the potential for increased stimulation of D1- and D2-like receptors (D1Rs and D2Rs, respectively) specifically in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) to modulate cue- and cocaine-elicited reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, we infused either the D1R agonist, SKF-38393 (0-4.0 microg/side) or the D2R agonist, 7-OH-DPAT (0-4.0 microg/side) into the CeA immediately prior to tests for cue and cocaine-primed reinstatement. We also examined the effects of 7-OH-DPAT on cocaine self-administration as a positive behavioral control. 7-OH-DPAT decreased cue-and cocaine-primed reinstatement, and reduced the number of cocaine infusions obtained during self-administration; SKF-38393 produced no discernable effects. The results suggest that enhanced stimulation of D2Rs, but not D1Rs, in the CeA is sufficient to inhibit expression of the incentive motivational effects of cocaine priming and cocaine-paired cues. Together with previous findings that D1R blockade attenuates reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, the results suggest that D1R stimulation may be necessary, but not sufficient, to modulate the incentive motivational effects of cues and cocaine priming.

Pharmacology of signaling induced by dopamine D(1)-like receptor activation

Dopamine D(1)-like receptors consisting of D(1) and D(5) subtypes are intimately implicated in dopaminergic regulation of fundamental neurophysiologic processes such as mood, motivation, cognitive function, and motor activity. Upon stimulation, D(1)-like receptors initiate signal transduction cascades that are mediated through adenylyl cyclase or phosphoinositide metabolism, with subsequent enhancement of multiple downstream kinase cascades. The latter actions propagate and further amplify the receptor signals, thus predisposing D(1)-like receptors to multifaceted interactions with various other mediators and receptor systems. The adenylyl cyclase response to dopamine or selective D(1)-like receptor agonists is reliably associated with the D(1) subtype, while emerging evidence indicates that the phosphoinositide responses in native brain tissues may be preferentially mediated through stimulation of the D(5) receptor. Besides classic coupling of each receptor subtype to specific G proteins, additional biophysical models are advanced in attempts to account for differential subcellular distribution, heteromolecular oligomerization, and activity-dependent selectivity of the receptors. It is expected that significant advances in understanding of dopamine neurobiology will emerge from current and anticipated studies directed at uncovering the molecular mechanisms of D(5) coupling to phosphoinositide signaling, the structural features that might enhance pharmacological selectivity for D(5) versus D(1) subtypes, the mechanism by which dopamine may modulate phosphoinositide synthesis, the contributions of the various responsive signal mediators to D(1) or D(5) interactions with D(2)-like receptors, and the spectrum of dopaminergic functions that may be attributed to each receptor subtype and signaling pathway.

Distribution of D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in the primate and rat basolateral amygdala

Dopamine, acting at the D1 family receptors (D1R) is critical for the functioning of the amygdala, including fear conditioning and cue-induced reinstatement of drug self administration. However, little is known about the different contributions of the two D1R subtypes, D(1) and D(5). We identified D(1)-immunoreactive patches in the primate that appear similar to the intercalated cell masses reported in the rodent; however, both receptors were present across the subdivisions of the primate amygdala including the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using immunoelectron microscopy, we established that both receptors have widespread distributions in BLA. The D1R subtypes colocalize in dendritic spines and terminals, with D(1) predominant in spines and D(5) in terminals. Single-cell RT-PCR confirmed that individual BLA projection neurons express both D(1) and D(5) mRNA. The responses of primate BLA neurons to dopamine and D1R drugs were studied using in vitro slices. We found that responses were similar to those previously reported in rat BLA neurons and included a mixture of postsynaptic and presynaptic actions. We investigated the distribution of D1R in the rat BLA and found that there were similarities between the species, such as more prominent D(5) localization to presynaptic structures. The higher affinity of D(5) for dopamine suggests that presynaptic actions may predominate in the BLA at low levels of dopamine, while postsynaptic effects increase and dominate as dopaminergic drive increases. The results presented here suggest a complex action of dopamine on BLA circuitry that may evolve with different degrees of dopaminergic stimulation.

D1 and D4 dopaminergic receptor interplay mediates coincident G protein-independent and dependent regulation of glutamate NMDA receptors in the lateral amygdala

Dopamine (DA) receptor and NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation in the lateral (LA) nucleus of the amygdala plays a critical role in emotional processing. Several distinct mechanisms regulate the molecular cross-talk between DA receptors and NMDARs in different brain regions; however, the cellular mechanism through which DA modulates NMDARs in LA projection neurons has not been studied. Here, we investigated the effect of DA receptor activation on NMDAR currents in LA projection neurons recorded in amygdala slices obtained from young rats. We found that DA reduces NMDAR current amplitudes in an additive manner through the activation of both D1-like and D2-like receptors. The reduction of NMDAR current amplitudes by D1-like receptor activation is mediated by a protein-protein interaction between the D1R and the NMDAR, while the regulation of NMDAR activity by D2-like receptors is elicited through a G protein-dependent pathway controlled by D4R. The results of our investigation show for the first time a functional interplay between D1R and D4R that mediates coincident G protein-independent and dependent regulation of NMDARs.

Dopamine D1 receptor coupling to Gs/olf and Gq in rat striatum and cortex: a scintillation proximity assay (SPA)/antibody-capture characterization of benzazepine agonists

Cloned, human dopamine D(1) receptors recruit multiple effectors but the G-protein subtype(s) activated by cerebral populations remain poorly defined, a question addressed using a rapid immunocapture technique. In rat striatum, dopamine (DA) and four selective, benzazepine agonists at D(1) receptors concentration-dependently enhanced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphas/olf. For all drugs, Galphaq was also recruited with similar potencies and efficacies. Comparable observations were made in the cortex wherein profiles of Galphas/olf vs Galphaq activation were also highly correlated. In contrast to Galphas/olf and Galphaq, Galphao and Galphai were activated neither in the striatum nor in the cortex, except for SKF82958. As compared to DA, both SKF81297 and SKF82958 were full agonists at Gs/olf and Gq in cortex and striatum, whereas SKF38393 behaved as a partial agonist. Likewise, the "atypical" agonist, SKF83959 only partially activated Galphaq and also Gs/olf in these two regions. In both striatum and cortex, the selective D(1) receptor antagonist, SCH23390, abolished the recruitment of Galphaq and Galphas by DA, and the action of DA was partially attenuated by SKF83959. These findings demonstrate that, in native CNS tissue, DA and other D(1) receptor agonists activate Galphas and Galphaq with similar potencies and efficacies, suggesting their recruitment via pharmacologically-indistinguishable populations of D(1) receptors, and show that SPA technology is well-adapted to study the coupling of native DA receptors.

Low affinity binding of the classical D1 antagonist SCH23390 in rodent brain: potential interaction with A2A and D2-like receptors

Whereas structurally dissimilar D(1) antagonists competing for [(3)H]-SCH23390 binding recognize primarily one site in striatum, two distinct affinity states are observed in both amygdala and hippocampus. The binding profile of SCH23390 is similar in both of these regions, with the high affinity site (K(D) approximately 0.4 nM) consistent with D(1)/D(5) receptors. The appearance of the low affinity site (K(D) approximately 300 nM) is dependent upon the absence of MgCl(2), but independent of D(1) expression (i.e., still present in D(1) knockout mice). Although the density of high affinity state receptor is lower in hippocampus or amygdala of D(1) knockout mice, some residual binding remains, consistent with the known expression of D(5) receptors in these regions. Remarkably, in hippocampus, the affinity of the low affinity site is shifted rightward in the presence of the D(2) antagonist domperidone and is largely absent in the hippocampus of D(2) knockout animals. Additionally, this site is also shifted rightward in the presence of the A(2A) ligands SCH58261, CSC, or NECA, or in the absence of A(2A) receptors. The affinity of SCH23390 for this low affinity site is greater than seen for SCH23390 binding to D(2) receptors in heterologous expression systems, consistent with the hypothesis that both D(2) and A(2A) receptors are involved in the low affinity binding site. Therefore, we suggest that the heteromerization of D(2) and A(2A) receptors reported previously in vitro also may occur in the brain of both rats and mice.

Dopamine D1 receptors co-distribute with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid type-1 subunits and modulate synaptically-evoked N-methyl-D-aspartic acid currents in rat basolateral amygdala

Activation of dopamine D1 or glutamate, N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) can potently influence affective behaviors and associative learning. Physical protein-protein interactions also can occur between C-terminal peptides of D1 receptors and the NMDA-receptor subunit-1 (NR1), suggesting intracellular associations of direct relevance to dopaminergic modulation of NMDA currents. We examined this possibility by combining electron microscopic immunolabeling of the D1 and NR1 C-terminal peptides with in vitro patch-clamp recording in the rat BLA. In the in vivo preparations, D1 and NR1 were localized to the surface or endomembranes of many of the same somata and dendrites as well as a few axon terminals, including those forming asymmetric, excitatory-type synapses. In vitro analysis of physiologically characterized projection neurons revealed an excitatory response to bath application of either dopamine or the preferential D1 receptor agonist, dihydrexidine. In these neurons, dopamine also selectively reduced stimulation-evoked isolated NMDA receptor-mediated currents, but not isolated non-NMDA receptor-mediated currents or the response to exogenous NMDA application. The selective reduction of the NMDA receptor-mediated currents suggests that this effect occurs at a postsynaptic locus. Moreover, both D1 and NR1 were localized to postsynaptic surfaces of biocytin-filled and physiologically characterized projection neurons. Our results provide ultrastructural evidence for D1/NR1 endomembrane associations that may dynamically contribute to the attenuation of NMDA receptor-mediated currents following prior activation of D1 receptors in BLA projection neurons. The potential for postsynaptic cross-talk between D1 and NMDA receptors in BLA projection neurons as well as a similar interaction in presynaptic terminals could have important implications for the formation and extinction of affective memories.

Effect of Ethanol on DARPP-32 Phosphorylation in Transgenic Mice That Express Human Type VII Adenylyl Cyclase in Brain

BACKGROUND

Dopamine and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein of molecular weight 32 kDa (DARPP-32) is a bidirectional signaling protein found in dopaminergically innervated brain areas. The characteristics and direction of DARPP-32 effects are regulated by phosphorylation of this protein. Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 on threonine-34 (T34) is regulated through the activation of dopamine (D1) receptors and stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) and protein kinase A activity and by calcineurin. Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 on threonine-75 (T75) is regulated by cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and protein phosphatase 2A. DARPP-32 has been implicated in the motivational effects of ethanol.

METHODS

The authors characterized transgenic mice that overexpress an ethanol-sensitive isoform of AC (AC7) in brain by measuring basal and ethanol-modulated DARPP-32 phosphorylation. Phosphorylated and total DARPP-32 were measured by immunoblotting in brain areas associated with the motivational and anxiolytic effects of ethanol (nucleus accumbens, striatum, and amygdala).

RESULTS

AC7 transgenic mice had higher basal levels of T34 DARPP-32 than wild-type mice in striatum and amygdala, whereas basal levels of T75 DARPP-32 did not differ between wild-type and transgenic mice. Ethanol administration increased T34 DARPP-32 in nucleus accumbens and amygdala (but not in the striatum) of wild-type and transgenic mice (with a greater effect in amygdala of transgenic mice than wild-type mice). Ethanol administration increased T75 DARPP-32 in amygdala of only the wild-type mice and in nucleus accumbens and striatum of both the transgenic and wild-type mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of ethanol on the balance of DARPP-32 phosphorylation, especially in amygdala of wild-type versus transgenic mice, may contribute to differential motivational effects of ethanol in these animals.

A specialized subclass of interneurons mediates dopaminergic facilitation of amygdala function

The amygdala is under inhibitory control from the cortex through the activation of local GABAergic interneurons. This inhibition is greatly diminished during heightened emotional states due to dopamine release. However, dopamine excites most amygdala interneurons, suggesting that this dopaminergic gate may be mediated by an unknown subpopulation of interneurons. We hypothesized that this gate is mediated by paracapsular intercalated cells, a subset of interneurons that are innervated by both cortical and mesolimbic dopaminergic afferents. Using transgenic mice that express GFP in GABAergic interneurons, we show that paracapsular cells form a network surrounding the basolateral complex of the amygdala. We found that they provide feedforward inhibition into the basolateral and the central amygdala. Dopamine hyperpolarized paracapsular cells through D1 receptors and substantially suppressed their excitability, resulting in a disinhibition of the basolateral and central nuclei. Suppression of the paracapsular system by dopamine provides a compelling neural mechanism for the increased affective behavior observed during stress or other hyperdopaminergic states.

Memory enhancement induced by post-training intrabasolateral amygdala infusions of beta-adrenergic or muscarinic agonists requires activation of dopamine receptors: Involvement of right, but not left, basolateral amygdala

Previous findings indicate that the noradrenergic, dopaminergic, and cholinergic innervations of the basolateral amygdala (BLA) modulate memory consolidation. The current study investigated whether memory enhancement induced by post-training intra-BLA infusions of a beta-adrenergic or muscarinic cholinergic agonist requires concurrent activation of dopamine (DA) receptors in the BLA. Rats with implanted BLA cannulae were trained on an inhibitory avoidance (IA) task and, 48 h later, tested for retention. Infusions of the beta-adrenergic agonist clenbuterol into the right BLA, but not the left, enhanced retention, and concurrent infusions of the nonspecific DA receptor antagonist cis-Flupenthixol (Flu) blocked the enhancement. Post-training infusions of the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine into the right BLA also enhanced retention, and concurrent infusions of Flu blocked this effect. Additional experiments investigated whether memory modulation was lateralized to the right BLA. Post-training DA infusions into the right BLA, but not the left, enhanced retention. Post-training infusions of lidocaine or muscimol, which impair retention when infused bilaterally, had no effect when infused unilaterally into either the right or left BLA. These findings, together with earlier work, suggest that the dopaminergic system in the BLA is critically involved in memory modulation induced by noradrenergic and cholinergic influences. Additionally, these findings indicate that the enhancement, but not impairment, of memory consolidation is lateralized to the right BLA.

Dopaminergic modulation of spontaneous inhibitory network activity in the lateral amygdala

There is converging evidence that dopamine (DA) receptor activation in the lateral amygdala (LA) is required for the acquisition of conditioned fear. Powerful inhibitory circuits exist in the LA shaping the activity of excitatory projection neurons and controlling the induction of associative plasticity, which is thought to underlie fear learning. In vivo and in vitro electrophysiological experiments indicate that DA suppresses inhibitory transmission triggered by excitatory afferent input. Conversely, DA increases the excitability of inhibitory interneurons in the LA. However, the mechanisms by which DA modulates inhibitory transmission are poorly understood. Using whole-cell recordings from LA projection neurons in coronal mouse brain slices, we found that DA strongly increased the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs). In addition, DA application induced low-frequency (2-6 Hz) oscillatory activity of inhibitory circuits in the absence of excitatory input. The increase in sIPSC frequency required activation of D1-like receptors. Unlike D1 receptor-mediated transmission in other brain areas, this effect was independent of the cAMP/PKA signal transduction cascade, but involved activation of the protein tyrosine kinase Src. This indicates that DA orchestrates the activity of populations of interneurons in the LA by a D1-dependent, non-canonical signal transduction pathway.

Dopamine modulates excitability of basolateral amygdala neurons in vitro

The amygdala plays a role in affective behaviors, which are modulated by the dopamine (DA) innervation of the basolateral amygdala complex (BLA). Although in vivo studies indicate that activation of DA receptors alters BLA neuronal activity, it is unclear whether DA exerts direct effects on BLA neurons or whether it acts via indirect effects on BLA afferents. Using whole cell patch-clamp recordings in rat brain slices, we investigated the site and mechanisms through which DA regulates the excitability of BLA neurons. Dopamine enhanced the excitability of BLA projection neurons in response to somatic current injections via a postsynaptic effect. Dopamine D1 receptor activation increased excitability and evoked firing, whereas D2 receptor activation increased input resistance. Current- and voltage-clamp experiments in projection neurons showed that D1 receptor activation enhanced excitability by modulating a 4-aminopyridine- and alpha-dendrotoxin-sensitive, slowly inactivating K+ current. Furthermore, DA and D1 receptor activation increased evoked firing in fast-spiking BLA interneurons. Consistent with a postsynaptic modulation of interneuron excitability, DA also increased the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents recorded in projection neurons without changing release of GABA. These data demonstrate that DA exerts direct effects on BLA projection neurons and indirect actions via modulation of interneurons that may work in concert to enhance the neuronal response to large, suprathreshold inputs, while suppressing weaker inputs.

Dopamine Receptor Signaling

The D1-like (D1, D5) and D2-like (D2, D3, D4) classes of dopamine receptors each has shared signaling properties that contribute to the definition of the receptor class, although some differences among subtypes within a class have been identified. D1-like receptor signaling is mediated chiefly by the heterotrimeric G proteins Galphas and Galphaolf, which cause sequential activation of adenylate cyclase, cylic AMP-dependent protein kinase, and the protein phosphatase-1 inhibitor DARPP-32. The increased phosphorylation that results from the combined effects of activating cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and inhibiting protein phosphatase 1 regulates the activity of many receptors, enzymes, ion channels, and transcription factors. D1 or a novel D1-like receptor also signals via phospholipase C-dependent and cyclic AMP-independent mobilization of intracellular calcium. D2-like receptor signaling is mediated by the heterotrimeric G proteins Galphai and Galphao. These pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins regulate some effectors, such as adenylate cyclase, via their Galpha subunits, but regulate many more effectors such as ion channels, phospholipases, protein kinases, and receptor tyrosine kinases as a result of the receptor-induced liberation of Gbetagamma subunits. In addition to interactions between dopamine receptors and G proteins, other protein:protein interactions such as receptor oligomerization or receptor interactions with scaffolding and signal-switching proteins are critical for regulation of dopamine receptor signaling.