Unannotated splicing regulatory elements in deep intron space

Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of PYL family genes and functional characterization of GhPYL8D2 under drought stress in Gossypium hirsutum

Cotton is a crucial economic crop, serving as a natural fiber source for the textile industry. However, drought stress poses a significant threat to cotton fiber quality and productivity worldwide. Pyrabactin Resistance 1-Like (PYL) proteins, as abscisic acid (ABA) receptors, play a crucial role in adverse stress responses, but knowledge about the PYLs in cotton remains limited. In our study, we identified 40 GhPYL genes in Gossypium hirsutum through a genome-wide analysis of the cotton genome database. Our analysis revealed that the PYL family formed three distinct subfamilies with typical family characteristics in G. hirsutum. Additionally, through quantitative expression analysis, including transcriptome dataset and qRT-PCR, we found that all GhPYLs were expressed in all tissues of G. hirsutum, and all GhPYLs were differentially expressed under drought stress. Among them, GhPYL4A1, GhPY5D1, GhPY8D2, and a member of the type 2C protein phosphatases clade A family in Gossypium hirsutum (GhPP2CA), GhHAI2D, showed significant differences in expression levels within 12 h after stress treatment. Our protein interaction analysis and BiFC demonstrated the complex regulatory network between GhPYL family proteins and GhPP2CA proteins. We also found that there is an interaction between GhPYL8D2 and GhHAI2D, and through drought treatment of transgenic cotton, we found that GhPYL8D2 played a vital role in the response of G. hirsutum to drought through stomatal control via co-regulation with GhHAI2D. Our findings provide useful insights into the regulation of GhPYL family genes that occur in response to abiotic stresses in cotton.

A network of DZF proteins controls alternative splicing regulation and fidelity

Proteins containing DZF (domain associated with zinc fingers) modules play important roles throughout gene expression, from transcription to translation. Derived from nucleotidyltransferases but lacking catalytic residues, DZF domains serve as heterodimerization surfaces between DZF protein pairs. Three DZF proteins are widely expressed in mammalian tissues, ILF2, ILF3 and ZFR, which form mutually exclusive ILF2-ILF3 and ILF2-ZFR heterodimers. Using eCLIP-Seq, we find that ZFR binds across broad intronic regions to regulate the alternative splicing of cassette and mutually exclusive exons. ZFR preferentially binds dsRNA in vitro and is enriched on introns containing conserved dsRNA elements in cells. Many splicing events are similarly altered upon depletion of any of the three DZF proteins; however, we also identify independent and opposing roles for ZFR and ILF3 in alternative splicing regulation. Along with widespread involvement in cassette exon splicing, the DZF proteins control the fidelity and regulation of over a dozen highly validated mutually exclusive splicing events. Our findings indicate that the DZF proteins form a complex regulatory network that leverages dsRNA binding by ILF3 and ZFR to modulate splicing regulation and fidelity.

Recursive splicing discovery using lariats in total RNA sequencing

Recursive splicing is a non-canonical splicing mechanism in which an intron is removed in segments via multiple splicing reactions. Relatively few recursive splice sites have been identified with high confidence in human introns, and more comprehensive analyses are needed to better characterize where recursive splicing happens and whether or not it has a regulatory function. In this study, we use an unbiased approach using intron lariats to search for recursive splice sites in constitutive introns and alternative exons in the human transcriptome. We find evidence for recursive splicing in a broader range of intron sizes than previously reported and detail a new location for recursive splicing at the distal ends of cassette exons. In addition, we identify evidence for the conservation of these recursive splice sites among higher vertebrates and the use of these sites to influence alternative exon exclusion. Together, our data demonstrate the prevalence of recursive splicing and its potential influence on gene expression through alternatively spliced isoforms.

Analysis of Pathogenic Pseudoexons Reveals Novel Mechanisms Driving Cryptic Splicing

Understanding pre-mRNA splicing is crucial to accurately diagnosing and treating genetic diseases. However, mutations that alter splicing can exert highly diverse effects. Of all the known types of splicing mutations, perhaps the rarest and most difficult to predict are those that activate pseudoexons, sometimes also called cryptic exons. Unlike other splicing mutations that either destroy or redirect existing splice events, pseudoexon mutations appear to create entirely new exons within introns. Since exon definition in vertebrates requires coordinated arrangements of numerous RNA motifs, one might expect that pseudoexons would only arise when rearrangements of intronic DNA create novel exons by chance. Surprisingly, although such mutations do occur, a far more common cause of pseudoexons is deep-intronic single nucleotide variants, raising the question of why these latent exon-like tracts near the mutation sites have not already been purged from the genome by the evolutionary advantage of more efficient splicing. Possible answers may lie in deep intronic splicing processes such as recursive splicing or poison exon splicing. Because these processes utilize intronic motifs that benignly engage with the spliceosome, the regions involved may be more susceptible to exonization than other intronic regions would be. We speculated that a comprehensive study of reported pseudoexons might detect alignments with known deep intronic splice sites and could also permit the characterisation of novel pseudoexon categories. In this report, we present and analyse a catalogue of over 400 published pseudoexon splice events. In addition to confirming prior observations of the most common pseudoexon mutation types, the size of this catalogue also enabled us to suggest new categories for some of the rarer types of pseudoexon mutation. By comparing our catalogue against published datasets of non-canonical splice events, we also found that 15.7% of pseudoexons exhibit some splicing activity at one or both of their splice sites in non-mutant cells. Importantly, this included seven examples of experimentally confirmed recursive splice sites, confirming for the first time a long-suspected link between these two splicing phenomena. These findings have the potential to improve the fidelity of genetic diagnostics and reveal new targets for splice-modulating therapies.

What's Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants

Alternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) involving consensus splicing regulatory sequences in a specific gene may result in the production of aberrant and not properly working proteins. In this review, we introduce the key steps of splicing mechanism and describe all different types of genomic variants affecting this process (splicing variants in acceptor/donor sites or branch point or polypyrimidine tract, exonic, and deep intronic changes). Then, we provide an updated approach to improve splice variants detection. First, we review the main computational tools, including the recent Machine Learning-based algorithms, for the prediction of splice site variants, in order to characterize how a genomic variant interferes with splicing process. Next, we report the experimental methods to validate the predictive analyses are defined, distinguishing between methods testing RNA (transcriptomics analysis) or proteins (proteomics experiments). For both prediction and validation steps, benefits and weaknesses of each tool/procedure are accurately reported, as well as suggestions on which approaches are more suitable in diagnostic rather than in clinical research.

Spatiotemporal Regulation of Transcript Isoform Expression in the Hippocampus

Proper development and plasticity of hippocampal neurons require specific RNA isoforms to be expressed in the right place at the right time. Precise spatiotemporal transcript regulation requires the incorporation of essential regulatory RNA sequences into expressed isoforms. In this review, we describe several RNA processing strategies utilized by hippocampal neurons to regulate the spatiotemporal expression of genes critical to development and plasticity. The works described here demonstrate how the hippocampus is an ideal investigative model for uncovering alternate isoform-specific mechanisms that restrict the expression of transcripts in space and time.