1
|
Szlanka T, Lukacsovich T, Bálint É, Virágh E, Szabó K, Hajdu I, Molnár E, Lin YH, Zvara Á, Kelemen-Valkony I, Méhi O, Török I, Hegedűs Z, Kiss B, Ramasz B, Magdalena LM, Puskás L, Mechler BM, Fónagy A, Asztalos Z, Steinbach G, Žurovec M, Boros I, Kiss I. Dominant suppressor genes of p53-induced apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2024; 14:jkae149. [PMID: 38985658 PMCID: PMC11373661 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
One of the major functions of programmed cell death (apoptosis) is the removal of cells that suffered oncogenic mutations, thereby preventing cancerous transformation. By making use of a Double-Headed-EP (DEP) transposon, a P element derivative made in our laboratory, we made an insertional mutagenesis screen in Drosophila melanogaster to identify genes that, when overexpressed, suppress the p53-activated apoptosis. The DEP element has Gal4-activatable, outward-directed UAS promoters at both ends, which can be deleted separately in vivo. In the DEP insertion mutants, we used the GMR-Gal4 driver to induce transcription from both UAS promoters and tested the suppression effect on the apoptotic rough eye phenotype generated by an activated UAS-p53 transgene. By DEP insertions, 7 genes were identified, which suppressed the p53-induced apoptosis. In 4 mutants, the suppression effect resulted from single genes activated by 1 UAS promoter (Pka-R2, Rga, crol, and Spt5). In the other 3 (Orct2, Polr2M, and stg), deleting either UAS promoter eliminated the suppression effect. In qPCR experiments, we found that the genes in the vicinity of the DEP insertion also showed an elevated expression level. This suggested an additive effect of the nearby genes on suppressing apoptosis. In the eukaryotic genomes, there are coexpressed gene clusters. Three of the DEP insertion mutants are included, and 2 are in close vicinity of separate coexpressed gene clusters. This raises the possibility that the activity of some of the genes in these clusters may help the suppression of the apoptotic cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Szlanka
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tamás Lukacsovich
- Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Éva Bálint
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Erika Virágh
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Kornélia Szabó
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Developmental Genetics, German Cancer Research Centre, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ildikó Hajdu
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Enikő Molnár
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Yu-Hsien Lin
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Ágnes Zvara
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ildikó Kelemen-Valkony
- Cellular Imaging Laboratory, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Orsolya Méhi
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - István Török
- Department of Developmental Genetics, German Cancer Research Centre, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zoltán Hegedűs
- Bioinformatics Laboratory, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Brigitta Kiss
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Beáta Ramasz
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Laura M Magdalena
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Puskás
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Bernard M Mechler
- Department of Developmental Genetics, German Cancer Research Centre, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adrien Fónagy
- Centre for Agricultural Sciences, Plant Protection Institute, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Asztalos
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
- Aktogen Hungary Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gábor Steinbach
- Cellular Imaging Laboratory, Core Facility, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Michal Žurovec
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Imre Boros
- Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| | - István Kiss
- Institute of Genetics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eroglu M, Derry WB. Your neighbours matter - non-autonomous control of apoptosis in development and disease. Cell Death Differ 2016; 23:1110-8. [PMID: 27177021 PMCID: PMC4946894 DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2016.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, the regulation of apoptosis has been thought of as an autonomous process in which the dying cell dictates its own demise. However, emerging studies in genetically tractable multicellular organisms, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, have revealed that death is often a communal event. Here, we review the current literature on non-autonomous mechanisms governing apoptosis in multiple cellular contexts. The importance of the cellular community in dictating the funeral arrangements of apoptotic cells has profound implications in development and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Eroglu
- Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W B Derry
- Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Andrade-Zapata I, Baonza A. The bHLH factors extramacrochaetae and daughterless control cell cycle in Drosophila imaginal discs through the transcriptional regulation of the Cdc25 phosphatase string. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004233. [PMID: 24651265 PMCID: PMC3961188 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 01/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the major issues in developmental biology is about having a better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate organ growth. Identifying these mechanisms is essential to understand the development processes that occur both in physiological and pathological conditions, such as cancer. The E protein family of basic helix-loop helix (bHLH) transcription factors, and their inhibitors the Id proteins, regulate cell proliferation in metazoans. This notion is further supported because the activity of these factors is frequently deregulated in cancerous cells. The E protein orthologue Daughterless (Da) and the Id orthologue Extramacrochaetae (Emc) are the only members of these classes of bHLH proteins in Drosophila. Although these factors are involved in controlling proliferation, the mechanism underlying this regulatory activity is poorly understood. Through a genetic analysis, we show that during the development of epithelial cells in the imaginal discs, the G2/M transition, and hence cell proliferation, is controlled by Emc via Da. In eukaryotic cells, the main activator of this transition is the Cdc25 phosphatase, string. Our genetic analyses reveal that the ectopic expression of string in cells with reduced levels of Emc or high levels of Da is sufficient to rescue the proliferative defects seen in these mutant cells. Moreover, we present evidence demonstrating a role of Da as a transcriptional repressor of string. Taken together, these findings define a mechanism through which Emc controls cell proliferation by regulating the activity of Da, which transcriptionally represses string. Precise control of cell proliferation is critical for normal development and tissue homeostasis. Members of the inhibitor of differentiation (Id) family of helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins are key regulators that coordinate the balance between cell division and differentiation. These proteins exert this function in part by combining with ubiquitously expressed bHLH transcription factors (E proteins), preventing these transcription factors from forming functional hetero- or homodimeric DNA binding complexes. Deregulation of the activity of Id proteins frequently leads to tumour formation. The Daughterless (Da) and Extramacrochaetae (Emc) proteins are the only members of the E and Id families in Drosophila, yet their role in the control of cell proliferation has not been determined. In this study, we show that the elimination of emc or the ectopic expression of da arrests cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Moreover, we demonstrate that emc controls cell proliferation via Da, which acts as a transcriptional repressor of the Cdc25 phosphatase string. These results provide an important insight into the mechanisms through which Id and E protein interactions control cell cycle progression and therefore how the disruption of the function of Id proteins can induce oncogenic transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Baonza
- Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC/UAM), Madrid, Spain
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mitchell NC, Lin JI, Zaytseva O, Cranna N, Lee A, Quinn LM. The Ecdysone receptor constrains wingless expression to pattern cell cycle across the Drosophila wing margin in a Cyclin B-dependent manner. BMC DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY 2013; 13:28. [PMID: 23848468 PMCID: PMC3720226 DOI: 10.1186/1471-213x-13-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2013] [Accepted: 07/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Background Ecdysone triggers transcriptional changes via the ecdysone receptor (EcR) to coordinate developmental programs of apoptosis, cell cycle and differentiation. Data suggests EcR affects cell cycle gene expression indirectly and here we identify Wingless as an intermediary factor linking EcR to cell cycle. Results We demonstrate EcR patterns cell cycle across the presumptive Drosophila wing margin by constraining wg transcription to modulate CycB expression, but not the previously identified Wg-targets dMyc or Stg. Furthermore co-knockdown of Wg restores CycB patterning in EcR knockdown clones. Wg is not a direct target of EcR, rather we demonstrate that repression of Wg by EcR is likely mediated by direct interaction between the EcR-responsive zinc finger transcription factor Crol and the wg promoter. Conclusions Thus we elucidate a critical mechanism potentially connecting ecdysone with patterning signals to ensure correct timing of cell cycle exit and differentiation during margin wing development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi C Mitchell
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nonautonomous apoptosis is triggered by local cell cycle progression during epithelial replacement in Drosophila. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31:2499-512. [PMID: 21482673 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01046-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Tissue remodeling involves collective cell movement, and cell proliferation and apoptosis are observed in both development and disease. Apoptosis and proliferation are considered to be closely correlated, but little is known about their coordinated regulation in physiological tissue remodeling in vivo. The replacement of larval abdominal epidermis with adult epithelium in Drosophila pupae is a simple model of tissue remodeling. During this process, larval epidermal cells (LECs) undergo apoptosis and are replaced by histoblasts, which are adult precursor cells. By analyzing caspase activation at the single-cell level in living pupae, we found that caspase activation in LECs is induced at the LEC/histoblast boundary, which expands as the LECs die. Manipulating histoblast proliferation at the LEC/histoblast boundary, either genetically or by UV illumination, indicated that local interactions with proliferating histoblasts triggered caspase activation in the boundary LECs. Finally, by monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of the S/G₂/M phase in histoblasts in vivo, we found that the transition from S/G₂ phases is necessary to induce nonautonomous LEC apoptosis at the LEC/histoblast boundary. The replacement boundary, formed as caspase activation is regulated locally by cell-cell communication, may drive the dynamic orchestration of cell replacement during tissue remodeling.
Collapse
|
6
|
Shyu LF, Sun J, Chung HM, Huang YC, Deng WM. Notch signaling and developmental cell-cycle arrest in Drosophila polar follicle cells. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 20:5064-73. [PMID: 19846665 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e09-01-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Temporal and spatial regulation of cell division is critical for proper development of multicellular organisms. An important aspect of this regulation is cell-cycle arrest, which in many cell types is coupled with differentiated status. Here we report that the polar cells--a group of follicle cells differentiated early during Drosophila oogenesis--are arrested at G2 phase and can serve as a model cell type for investigation of developmental regulation of cell-cycle arrest. On examining the effects of String, a mitosis-promoting phosphatase Cdc25 homolog, and Notch signaling in polar cells, we found that misexpression of String can trigger mitosis in existing polar cells to induce extra polar cells. Normally, differentiation of the polar cells requires Notch signaling. We found that the Notch-induced extra polar cells arise through recruitment of the neighboring cells rather than promotion of proliferation, and they are also arrested at G2 phase. Notch signaling is probably involved in down-regulating String in polar cells, thus inducing the G2 cell-cycle arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Fang Shyu
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Regulation of cell proliferation and wing development by Drosophila SIN3 and String. Mech Dev 2010; 127:96-106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2009.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2009] [Revised: 09/23/2009] [Accepted: 10/06/2009] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
8
|
Ninov N, Manjón C, Martín-Blanco E. Dynamic control of cell cycle and growth coupling by ecdysone, EGFR, and PI3K signaling in Drosophila histoblasts. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:e1000079. [PMID: 19355788 PMCID: PMC2672598 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2008] [Accepted: 02/20/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulation of cell proliferation has been extensively studied in cultured cell systems that are characterized by coordinated growth and cell-cycle progression and relatively uniform cell size distribution. During the development of multicellular organisms, however, growth and division can be temporally uncoupled, and the signaling pathways that regulate these growth programs are poorly understood. A good model for analyzing proliferation control in such systems is the morphogenesis of the Drosophila adult abdominal epidermis by histoblasts. These cells undergo a series of temporally regulated transitions during which neither cell size nor division rate is constant. The proliferation of histoblasts during metamorphosis is uniquely amenable to clonal analysis in combination with live imaging. Thereby, we show that abdominal histoblasts, which grow while in G2 arrest during larval stages, enter a proliferative stage in the pupal period that is initiated by ecdysone-dependent string/Cdc25 phosphatase transcription. The proliferating histoblasts have preaccumulated stores of Cyclin E, which trigger an immediate S phase onset after mitosis. These rapid cell cycles lack a G1 phase and result in a progressive reduction of cell size. Eventually, the histoblasts proceed to a stage of slower proliferation that, in contrast to the preceding, depends on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling for progression through the G2/M transition and on insulin receptor/PI3K-mediated signaling for growth. These results uncover the developmentally programmed changes coupling the growth and proliferation of the histoblasts that form the abdominal epidermis of Drosophila. Histoblasts proceed through three distinct stages: growth without division, division without growth, and growth-coupled proliferation. Our identification of the signaling pathways and cell-cycle regulators that control these programs illustrates the power of in vivo time-lapse analyses after clone induction. It sets the stage for the comprehensive understanding of the coordination of cell growth and cell-cycle progression in complex multicellular eukaryotes. A fundamental issue in biology is the question of how the rate of cell division is coupled to cell growth. Coordination of these processes has been studied extensively in cultured cell systems but to a much lesser extent in intact organisms. To study this phenomenon in a physiological setting, we developed a methodology to observe and manipulate cell division and growth in a population of Drosophila abdominal cells called histoblasts. The various developmental stages of histoblast morphogenesis include exit from cell-cycle arrest, initially rapid growth in the absence of cell division, and subsequent coupling of proliferation and growth. We identified several critical developmental signaling pathways (including signaling via ecdysone, the EGF receptor, and PI 3-kinase) that regulate and coordinate cell growth and division cycles during these different types of cell-cycle phenomena. We propose that the internal logic of the Drosophila histoblast system may serve as a basic framework for understanding not only how coordinated cell growth and division operate in a number of other developmental contexts, but also how misregulation of cell growth and division occurs in contexts such as cancer cell populations. Integration of the ecdysone, EGF receptor, and PI 3-kinase signaling pathways determines the relative rates of growth and cell division duringDrosophila abdominal cell morphogenesis.
Collapse
|
9
|
Weaver M, Krasnow MA. Dual origin of tissue-specific progenitor cells in Drosophila tracheal remodeling. Science 2008; 321:1496-9. [PMID: 18669822 DOI: 10.1126/science.1158712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
During Drosophila metamorphosis, most larval cells die. Pupal and adult tissues form from imaginal cells, tissue-specific progenitors allocated in embryogenesis that remain quiescent during embryonic and larval life. Clonal analysis and fate mapping of single, identified cells show that tracheal system remodeling at metamorphosis involves a classical imaginal cell population and a population of differentiated, functional larval tracheal cells that reenter the cell cycle and regain developmental potency. In late larvae, both populations are activated and proliferate, spread over and replace old branches, and diversify into various stalk and coiled tracheolar cells under control of fibroblast growth factor signaling. Thus, Drosophila pupal/adult tissue progenitors can arise both by early allocation of multipotent cells and late return of differentiated cells to a multipotent state, even within a single tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Weaver
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5307, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Buttitta LA, Katzaroff AJ, Perez CL, de la Cruz A, Edgar BA. A double-assurance mechanism controls cell cycle exit upon terminal differentiation in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2007; 12:631-43. [PMID: 17419999 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2006] [Revised: 02/13/2007] [Accepted: 02/27/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Terminal differentiation is often coupled with permanent exit from the cell cycle, yet it is unclear how cell proliferation is blocked in differentiated tissues. We examined the process of cell cycle exit in Drosophila wings and eyes and discovered that cell cycle exit can be prevented or even reversed in terminally differentiating cells by the simultaneous activation of E2F1 and either Cyclin E/Cdk2 or Cyclin D/Cdk4. Enforcing both E2F and Cyclin/Cdk activities is required to bypass exit because feedback between E2F and Cyclin E/Cdk2 is inhibited after cells differentiate, ensuring that cell cycle exit is robust. In some differentiating cell types (e.g., neurons), known inhibitors including the retinoblastoma homolog Rbf and the p27 homolog Dacapo contribute to parallel repression of E2F and Cyclin E/Cdk2. In other cell types, however (e.g., wing epithelial cells), unknown mechanisms inhibit E2F and Cyclin/Cdk activity in parallel to enforce permanent cell cycle exit upon terminal differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Buttitta
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reis T, Edgar BA. Negative regulation of dE2F1 by cyclin-dependent kinases controls cell cycle timing. Cell 2004; 117:253-64. [PMID: 15084262 DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00247-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2003] [Revised: 02/13/2004] [Accepted: 02/17/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Many types of cells compensate for induced alterations in the length of one cell cycle phase (G1, S, or G2) by altering the lengths of the other phases. Here we show that, when cells in Drosophila wing discs are delayed in G1, they maintain normal division rates by accelerating passage through S and G2. Similarly, when G2-->M progression is retarded, G1-->S progression accelerates. This compensation mechanism employs negative feedback in which the cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk1 and Cdk2 downregulate the transcription factor dE2F1. dE2F1, in turn, positively regulates cyclin E and string/cdc25, which activate the Cdks to drive cell cycle progression. This homeostatic mechanism coordinates rates of G1-->S and G2-->M progression, maintaining normal rates of proliferation when cell cycle controls are perturbed (e.g., by ectopic Dacapo, dWee1, dMyc, or Rheb). Without dE2F1, the compensatory mechanism fails, and treatments that alter Cdk activity cause aberrant cell cycle timing and cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tânia Reis
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nègre N, Ghysen A, Martinez AM. Mitotic G2-arrest is required for neural cell fate determination in Drosophila. Mech Dev 2003; 120:253-65. [PMID: 12559497 DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00419-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
In the wing discs of Drosophila, the mecanosensory precursor cells are singled out from clusters of cells blocked at the G2 phase of the cell cycle. This mitotic quiescence and the selection of the precursors are under strict spatio-temporal control. We forced G2 cells to enter mitosis by overexpression of string, the Drosophila homologue of the cdc25 gene. Premature entrance in the cell cycle is associated to a loss of precursor cells. Precursors are lost consecutively to a transcriptional down-regulation of the determinant proneural achaete/scute genes. This down-regulation results from an over-activation of the Enhancer of Split genes, known as effectors of the Notch signalling pathway. We conclude that exit from the cell cycle is required for proper neural cell fate determination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Nègre
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS, 141 rue de la cardonille, 34396 Cedex 5, Montpellier, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu SY, Yoo SJ, Yang L, Zapata C, Srinivasan A, Hay BA, Baker NE. A pathway of signals regulating effector and initiator caspases in the developing Drosophila eye. Development 2002; 129:3269-78. [PMID: 12070100 DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.13.3269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Regulated cell death and survival play important roles in neural development. Extracellular signals are presumed to regulate seven apparent caspases to determine the final structure of the nervous system. In the eye, the EGF receptor, Notch, and intact primary pigment and cone cells have been implicated in survival or death signals. An antibody raised against a peptide from human caspase 3 was used to investigate how extracellular signals controlled spatial patterning of cell death. The antibody crossreacted specifically with dying Drosophila cells and labelled the activated effector caspase Drice. It was found that the initiator caspase Dronc and the proapoptotic gene head involution defective were important for activation in vivo. Dronc may play roles in dying cells in addition to activating downstream effector caspases. Epistasis experiments ordered EGF receptor, Notch, and primary pigment and cone cells into a single pathway that affected caspase activity in pupal retina through hid and Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins. None of these extracellular signals appeared to act by initiating caspase activation independently of hid. Taken together, these findings indicate that in eye development spatial regulation of cell death and survival is integrated through a single intracellular pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun-Yun Yu
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Manak JR, Mitiku N, Lipsick JS. Mutation of the Drosophila homologue of the Myb protooncogene causes genomic instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:7438-43. [PMID: 12032301 PMCID: PMC124249 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.122231599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2002] [Accepted: 04/16/2002] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Vertebrates have three related Myb genes. The c-Myb protooncogene is required for definitive hematopoiesis in mice and when mutated causes leukemias and lymphomas in birds and mammals. The A-Myb gene is required for spermatogenesis and mammary gland proliferation in mice. The ubiquitously expressed B-Myb gene is essential for early embryonic development in mice and is directly regulated by the p16/cyclin D/Rb family/E2F pathway along with many critical S-phase genes. Drosophila has a single Myb gene most closely related to B-Myb. We have isolated two late-larval lethal alleles of Drosophila Myb. Mutant imaginal discs show an increased number of cells arrested in M phase. Mutant mitotic cells display a variety of abnormalities including spindle defects and increased polyploidy and aneuploidy. Remarkably, some mutant cells have an aberrant S- to M-phase transition in which replicating chromosomes undergo premature histone phosphorylation and chromosomal condensation. These results suggest that the absence of Drosophila Myb causes a defect in S phase that may result in M-phase abnormalities. Consistent with a role for Drosophila Myb during S phase, we detected Dm-Myb protein in S-phase nuclei of wild-type mitotic cells as well as endocycling cells, which lack both an M phase and cyclin B expression. Moreover, we found that the Dm-Myb protein is concentrated in regions of S-phase nuclei that are actively undergoing DNA replication. Together these findings imply that Dm-Myb provides an essential nontranscriptional function during chromosomal replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Robert Manak
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Room L216, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5324, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakato H, Fox B, Selleck SB. dally, a Drosophila member of the glypican family of integral membrane proteoglycans, affects cell cycle progression and morphogenesis via a Cyclin A-mediated process. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:123-30. [PMID: 11801730 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115.1.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
division abnormally delayed (dally) encodes an integral membrane proteoglycan of the glypican family that affects a number of patterning events during both embryonic and larval development. Earlier studies demonstrated that Dally regulates cellular responses to Wingless (Wg) and Decapentaplegic (Dpp) in a tissue-specific manner, consistent with its proposed role as a growth factor co-receptor. dally mutants also display cell cycle progression defects in specific sets of dividing cells in the developing optic lobe and retina. The affected cells in the retina and lamina show delays in completion of the G2-M segment of the cell cycle. We have investigated the molecular basis of dally-mediated cell division defects by examining the genetic interactions between dally and known cell cycle regulators.
Reductions in cyclin A but not cyclin B or string expression, suppress dally cell division defects in the optic lobe. cycA mutations also dominantly rescue many dally adult morphological defects including lethality, phenotypes that are unaffected by reducing cycB function. dally mutants show abnormal Cyclin A expression in the dividing cells affected, with appreciable levels of Cyclin A remaining in late prophase and metaphase, stages where Cyclin A is normally absent. Given that Dally is known to regulate the activity of secreted growth factors our findings suggest that extracellular cues influence the degradation of Cyclin A in a manner that controls cell cycle progression and ultimately, cell division patterning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Nakato
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and The Arizona Cancer Center, Salmon Building, Rm 0975, 1515 N. Campbell Avenue, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baker NE, Yu SY. The EGF receptor defines domains of cell cycle progression and survival to regulate cell number in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 2001; 104:699-708. [PMID: 11257224 DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00266-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The number of cells in developing organs must be controlled spatially by extracellular signals. Our results show how cell number can be regulated by cell interactions controlling proliferation and survival in local neighborhoods in the case of the Drosophila compound eye. Intercellular signals act during the second mitotic wave, a cell cycle that generates a pool of uncommitted cells used for most ommatidial fates. We find that G1/S progression to start the cell cycle requires EGF receptor inactivity. EGF receptor activation is then required for progression from G2 to M phase of the same cells, and also prevents apoptosis. EGF receptor activation depends on short-range signals from five-cell preclusters of photoreceptor neurons not participating in the second mitotic wave. Through proliferation and survival control, such signals couple the total number of uncommitted cells being generated to the neural patterning of the retina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N E Baker
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mozer BA, Easwarachandran K. Pattern formation in the absence of cell proliferation: tissue-specific regulation of cell cycle progression by string (stg) during Drosophila eye development. Dev Biol 1999; 213:54-69. [PMID: 10452846 DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
During Drosophila eye development, the posterior-to-anterior movement of the morphogenetic furrow coordinates cell cycle progression with the early events of pattern formation. The cdc25 phosphatase string (stg) has been proposed to contribute to the synchronization of retinal precursors anterior to the furrow by driving cells in G(2) through mitosis and into a subsequent G(1). Genetic and molecular analysis of Drop (Dr) mutations suggests that they represent novel cis-regulatory alleles of stg that inactivate expression in eye. Retinal precursors anterior to the furrow lacking stg arrest in G(2) and fail to enter mitosis, while cells within the furrow accumulate high levels of cyclins A and B. Although G(2)-arrested cells initiate normal pattern formation, the absence of stg results in retinal patterning defects due to the recruitment of extra photoreceptor cells. These results demonstrate a requirement for stg in cell cycle regulation and cell fate determination during eye development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A Mozer
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Building 36, Room 3D02, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lehman DA, Patterson B, Johnston LA, Balzer T, Britton JS, Saint R, Edgar BA. Cis-regulatory elements of the mitotic regulator, string/Cdc25. Development 1999; 126:1793-803. [PMID: 10101114 PMCID: PMC10176497 DOI: 10.1242/dev.126.9.1793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Mitosis in most Drosophila cells is triggered by brief bursts of transcription of string (stg), a Cdc25-type phosphatase that activates the mitotic kinase, Cdk1 (Cdc2). To understand how string transcription is regulated, we analyzed the expression of string-lacZ reporter genes covering approximately 40 kb of the string locus. We also tested protein coding fragments of the string locus of 6 kb to 31.6 kb for their ability to complement loss of string function in embryos and imaginal discs. A plethora of cis-acting elements spread over >30 kb control string transcription in different cells and tissue types. Regulatory elements specific to subsets of epidermal cells, mesoderm, trachea and nurse cells were identified, but the majority of the string locus appears to be devoted to controlling cell proliferation during neurogenesis. Consistent with this, compact promotor-proximal sequences are sufficient for string function during imaginal disc growth, but additional distal elements are required for the development of neural structures in the eye, wing, leg and notum. We suggest that, during evolution, cell-type-specific control elements were acquired by a simple growth-regulated promoter as a means of coordinating cell division with developmental processes, particularly neurogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Lehman
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant disorder leading to the widespread development of benign tumors that often contain giant cells. We show that the Drosophila gene gigas encodes a homolog of TSC2, a gene mutated in half of TSC patients. Clones of gigas mutant cells induced in imaginal discs differentiate normally to produce adult structures. However, the cells in these clones are enlarged and repeat S phase without entering M phase. Our results suggest that the TSC disorder may result from an underlying defect in cell cycle control. We have also identified a Drosophila homolog of TSC1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ito
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720-3200, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Secombe J, Pispa J, Saint R, Richardson H. Analysis of a Drosophila cyclin E hypomorphic mutation suggests a novel role for cyclin E in cell proliferation control during eye imaginal disc development. Genetics 1998; 149:1867-82. [PMID: 9691043 PMCID: PMC1460270 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
We have generated and characterized a Drosophila cyclin E hypomorphic mutation, DmcycEJP, that is homozygous viable and fertile, but results in adults with rough eyes. The mutation arose from an internal deletion of an existing P[w+lacZ] element inserted 14 kb upstream of the transcription start site of the DmcycE zygotic mRNA. The presence of this deleted P element, but not the P[w+lacZ] element from which it was derived, leads to a decreased level of DmcycE expression during eye imaginal disc development. Eye imaginal discs from DmcycEJP larvae contain fewer S phase cells, both anterior and posterior to the morphogenetic furrow. This results in adults with small rough eyes, largely due to insufficient numbers of pigment cells. Altering the dosage of the Drosophila cdk2 homolog, cdc2c, retinoblastoma, or p21(CIP1) homolog dacapo, which encode proteins known to physically interact with Cyclin E, modified the DmcycEJP rough eye phenotype as expected. Decreasing the dosage of the S phase transcription factor gene, dE2F, enhanced the DmcycEJP rough eye phenotype. Surprisingly, mutations in G2/M phase regulators cyclin A and string (cdc25), but not cyclin B1, B3, or cdc2, enhanced the DmcycEJP phenotype without affecting the number of cells entering S phase, but by decreasing the number of cells entering mitosis. Our analysis establishes the DmcycEJP allele as an excellent resource for searching for novel cyclin E genetic interactors. In addition, this analysis has identified cyclin A and string as DmcycEJP interactors, suggesting a novel role for cyclin E in the regulation of Cyclin A and String function during eye development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Secombe
- Department of Genetics, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5005
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|