Carboplatin as a radiation sensitizer in locally advanced cervical cancer: a pilot study

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Metformin in Cervical Cancer

Simple Summary

The potential effects of metformin in terms of cancer prevention and therapy have been widely studied, and a number of studies have indicated its potential role in cancer treatment. Metformin exerts anticancer effects, alone or in combination with other agents, on cervical cancer in vitro and in vivo. Metformin might thus serve as an adjunct therapeutic agent for cervical cancer.

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the major gynecologic malignancies worldwide. Treatment options include chemotherapy, surgical resection, radiotherapy, or a combination of these treatments; however, relapse and recurrence may occur, and the outcome may not be favorable. Metformin is an established, safe, well-tolerated drug used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes; it can be safely combined with other antidiabetic agents. Diabetes, possibly associated with an increased site-specific cancer risk, may relate to the progression or initiation of specific types of cancer. The potential effects of metformin in terms of cancer prevention and therapy have been widely studied, and a number of studies have indicated its potential role in cancer treatment. The most frequently proposed mechanism underlying the diabetes–cancer association is insulin resistance, which leads to secondary hyperinsulinemia; furthermore, insulin may exert mitogenic effects through the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) receptor, and hyperglycemia may worsen carcinogenesis through the induction of oxidative stress. Evidence has suggested clinical benefits of metformin in the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Combining current anticancer drugs with metformin may increase their efficacy and diminish adverse drug reactions. Accumulating evidence is indicating that metformin exerts anticancer effects alone or in combination with other agents in cervical cancer in vitro and in vivo. Metformin might thus serve as an adjunct therapeutic agent for cervical cancer. Here, we reviewed the potential anticancer effects of metformin against cervical cancer and discussed possible underlying mechanisms.

The efficacy of concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate whether carboplatin has a comparable efficacy with cisplatin as part of weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer (Car-RT vs. Cis-RT).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted and both prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated the efficacy of Car-RT for cervical cancer were included. The primary endpoints were complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The estimated CR rate and survival of patients treated with Car-RT were pooled. Acute toxicity was also summarized.

RESULTS

Twelve studies consisting of 1698 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. A lower CR rate (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82, I² = 0%) and a trend toward poorer 3-year PFS/DFS (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49-1.02, I² = 0%) and 3-year OS (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46-1.05, I² = 36%) were found in Car-RT compared with Cis-RT. For the Car-RT groups, the pooled overall CR rate was 81% (95% CI 0.74-0.89). The pooled 3-year PFS/DFS rate was 64% (95% CI 0.52-0.78). The pooled 3-year OS rate was 73% (95% CI 0.62-0.87). Acute toxic events ≥ grade 3 were infrequent in the Car-RT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Car-RT showed a poorer tumor response and a trend toward inferior survival compared with Cis-RT in the treatment of cervical cancer. However, this evidence was limited by the imbalance among studies. Due to the encouraging efficacy and low toxicity, carboplatin is a suitable concurrent agent for patients with contraindications to cisplatin.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Radiation and Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Review of the Recent Literature

Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer; nevertheless it fails to control disease progression within the irradiation fields in more than 40% of cases, particularly in patients with bulky tumor. Distant metastases are not infrequent in more advanced cases. Chemotherapy has been integrated with radiotherapy to improve local control and treat distant subclinical metastases. Schedules of combined treatment more frequently represented by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation (NACT) and by concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (CT-RT). A review of the recent literature is presented. The role of NACT is controversial: high response rates are reported but doubtful advantages in terms of survival or local control have been shown. In randomized trials, hydroxyurea concomitant to radiation improves local control and survival, particularly in stage IIIB and IVA. Several randomized trials of concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU, cisplatin and mitomycin C are underway, but few have been published: no significative differences are reported in term of local control or survival. Acute toxicity is higher than in radiation alone, but usually manageable. For the analysis of late morbidity a longer follow-up is required. Large randomized trials of adequate radiotherapy versus concomitant chemoradiation are necessary to refine our understanding of the benefits of this integrated treatment.

Radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: outcome analysis with emphasis on the impact of treatment duration on outcome

Objective. To assess the effectiveness and toxicity of carboplatin concurrent with pelvic external beam radiation and low-dose rate brachytherapy and to assess the impact that adherence to the treatment plan has on outcomes. Methods. Retrospective chart review of 56 patients treated from January 2001 to December 2010. Results. Median follow-up was 68 months. Optimal dose of radiation (ORT) was defined as a minimal cervical dose exceeding 70 Gy, point A dose of 80–90 Gy, and duration not exceeding 56 days. Only 50% received ORT. In multivariable analyses we only found ORT to be statistically significant predictor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (HR [95% CI] for non-ORT vs. ORT: 2.4 [1.2, 5.1], P = 0.014 for PFS and 2.2 [1.1, 4.6], P = 0.035 for OS). The 5-year PFS in patients who received ORT was better than that in patients who received non-ORT, 56% vs. 22% (95% CI: [36%, 72%] vs. [9%, 39%]). Patients who received ORT had a better 5-year OS as well (59% vs. 33%; 95% CI: [38%, 75%] vs. [16%, 51%]). Conclusion. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with weakly carboplatin or cisplatin, teletherapy, and low dose-dose rate brachytherapy have poorer outcomes when treatment duration is prolonged.

A comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a multi-center study

Background

We investigated the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) over radiotherapy (RT) in Chinese patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Patients and methods

Between January 2005 and January 2008, 192 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were included in the study: 96 in arm A (CCRT with 20 mg/m² cisplatin for 5 days) and 96 in arm B (RT). The overall response rate was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity.

Results

The 5-year overall response rate was 67% and 53% for the CCRT and RT arms, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant, while the median overall survival was 68 months (range 3-85 months) and 61 months (range 4-83 months), respectively (P = 0.009). In addition, the median progression-free survival for CCRT was 62 months (range 3-83 months), whereas it was 51 months (range 4-81 months) for the RT arm (P = 0.025). The toxicity profile, both acute and late, was comparable in both arms.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrate that CCRT was effective and better tolerated than RT alone in Chinese patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trials Register: ChiCTR-TRC-13003979.

Treatment outcomes of concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer patients who received concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiation therapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who had primary radiation treatment in concurrent with weekly carboplatin (100mg/m(2) or AUC 2) from 1997 to 2008 were identified. Demographic data, chemotherapy cycles, total treatment time, toxicities, and treatment outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight patients with stage IIB (50.7%), IIIB (48.0%) and IVA (1.3%) cervical cancer patients were included in the study. Median total treatment time was 53.5 days (range, 45-100 days). Carboplatin was given for a median number of 6 cycles (range, 3-6 cycles). Complete response was achieved in 142 patients (95.9%) while six (4.1%) had persistent diseases. Among the 142 responders, 36 experienced recurrences: pelvic recurrences in seven (4.7%), distant failure in 25 (16.9%), and both pelvic and distant in four (2.7%). The 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 75.1% and 63.0%, respectively with the corresponding 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates of 81.9% and 63.5%. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were observed during treatment in any patients. Late grade 3-4 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were 10.1% and 0.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiation therapy yields high response rate with modest progression-free and overall survivals in locally advanced cervical cancer. The regimen is feasible with minimal toxicities.

A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer

Purpose/Objective

This is a prospective comparison of weekly cisplatin to weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Materials/Methods

Between May 2000 and May 2004, 31 women with FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer or with postsurgical pelvic recurrence were enrolled into this phase II study and randomized to receive on a weekly basis either 40 mg/m² Cisplatin (group I; 16 patients) or 50 mg/m² paclitaxel (group II; 15 patients) concurrently with radiotherapy. Median total dose to point A was 74 Gy (range: 66-92 Gy) for group I and 66 Gy (range: 40-98 Gy) for group II. Median follow-up time was 46 months.

Results

Patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean number of chemotherapy cycles was also comparable with 87% and 80% of patients receiving at least 4 doses in groups I and II, respectively. Seven patients (44%) of group I and 8 patients (53%) of group II developed tumor recurrence. The Median Survival time was not reached for Group I and 53 months for group II. The proportion of patients surviving at 2 and 5 years was 78% and 54% for group I and 73% and 43% for group II respectively.

Conclusions

This small prospective study shows that weekly paclitaxel does not provide any clinical advantage over weekly cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

Pharmacotherapy options for locally advanced and advanced cervical cancer

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutic modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be investigated. A recent, randomized, phase III trial has shown for the first time that combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine concurrently with radiation improves parameters of survival over cisplatin alone and establishes a new standard for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. On the other hand, advanced disease, presenting either as an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB or as persistent or recurrent to primary therapy without local curative options, remains a devastating group of diseases with no options other than palliative chemotherapy. Recent results from the GOG (Gynecologic and Oncologic Group)-204 study demonstrate that cisplatin-doublets with paclitaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine or topotecan only produce small improvements in survival, although with different toxicity patterns; hence, patient-related factors are important when choosing any one of these regimens. The role of targeted therapies both in locally advanced and advanced disease is promising, but still at an investigational stage.

A randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. This study was a preliminary result of a randomized two arms, prospective, open-label phase III trial comparing the activity and safety of the concurrent chemoradiation of Tegafur-Uracil and carboplatin or carboplatin alone in locally advanced cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer patients were randomized to have Tegafur-Uracil 225 mg/m(2)/day orally, 5 days a week and carboplatin 100 mg/m(2) IV over 30-60 min, weekly on day 1 concurrent with standard radiotherapy (Group A) or carboplatin alone concurrent with standard radiotherapy (Group B).

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were randomized to Group A (n=234) or Group B (n=235). The tumor response at 3-month follow-up time showed no significant difference. The only prognostic factor to improve the complete response rate was the hemoglobin level. The patients in Group A, who had Hb <10 gm/dL had the relatively better change to complete response of 1.48 compared to that in Group B (P 0.025, 95% CI 1.07, 2.04). No severe toxicity or adverse event had been reported. The median follow-up time for Group A and Group B was 12.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. There was no statistical difference in PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiation by Tegafur-Uracil and carboplatin showed no difference in tumor response rate or treatment toxicity compared to carboplatin alone. The combination drugs might have benefit in poor prognostic patients such as the baseline Hb <10 gm/dL.

Radiosensitizers in cervical cancer. Cisplatin and beyond

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutical modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be assayed. A strategy currently being investigated is the use of newer radiosensitizers alone or in combination with platinum compounds. In the present work, we present preclinical information on known and newer cytotoxic agents as radiosensitizers on cervical cancer models, as well as the clinical information emanating from early phase trials that incorporate them to the cervical cancer management. In addition, we present the perspectives on the combined approach of radiation therapy and molecular target-based drugs with proven radiosensitizing capacity.

Chemotherapy in the primary treatment of cervical carcinoma

Two major treatment modalities in cervical cancer include radiotherapy and surgery. In an attempt to improve the outcome, these modalities have been increasingly supplemented by chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can be combined with local therapies in various sequences. Of the two possible strategies using chemotherapy and radiotherapy (sequential or concomitant), the latter seems to be more effective. Platinum-based regimens applied concurrently with both definitive and post-operative radiation therapy were demonstrated to provide survival benefit in five of the six recently published randomised trials. The positive impact of chemotherapy added to radiotherapy has also been shown in a meta-analysis including 1894 patients in 19 randomised studies. This strategy, however, is accompanied by increased early toxicity. The benefit of chemotherapy applied prior to surgery remains debatable. The role of new cytotoxic and biological substances, as well as agents combating tumour hypoxia, warrants further clinical investigation.

Phase I study of daily cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiation based on cisplatin is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma; however, the optimal scheduling and dosing have still not been established. This study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin for daily administration during pelvic radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Fourteen patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma and 13 who required postoperative RT were registered. A low dose of cisplatin was given daily concurrently with RT. Cisplatin dosing was started at 6.0 mg/m(2)/day, which was incremented by 0.5 mg/m(2)/day. RT was delivered at 2 Gy/day to a total dose of 50 Gy. The MTD was defined as the dose level immediately below that causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in over one-third of treated patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated with a maximum of six escalating dose levels. In 22/25 patients (88%), cisplatin was administered continuously as planned without interruption. The MTD was determined to be 8 mg/m(2) and the DLT was indicated by the onset of neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Daily cisplatin, at 8 mg/m(2)/day, is a well-tolerated radiosensitizer in cervical carcinoma patients.

The role of chemotherapy in locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is among the major health problems world-wide although advances in screening programs. Surgery and radiotherapy are the treatment modalities of choice for early and locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the role of chemotherapy in this setting has been better investigated in the latest years. To improve loco-regional control in locally advanced disease, authors have tested both neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From 1999 NCI clinical announcement, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation is considered the treatment of choice for cervical cancer patients requiring radiation therapy. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is reaching encouraging results in IB bulky-IIA cervical cancer, but further investigation are ongoing in locally advanced cervical setting. The optimal treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer is still undefined and chemotherapy is used with palliation intent. Cisplatin remains the most active cytotoxic agents, although combinations of cisplatin with paclitaxel, topotecan, vinorelbine, have shown encouraging results in phase II and in early phase III studies. This paper reviews the role of chemotherapy in the management of patients with locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. Studies discussed in this paper were selected trough a search in the med-line database performed in October 2003.

Evaluation of concurrent and adjuvant carboplatin with radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the toxicity profile and long-term outcomes of patients receiving carboplatin with concurrent radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to identify patients treated with carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer with a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Records were reviewed for demographic data, chemotherapy doses, toxicities, and survival outcomes. Specifically reviewed were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and renal toxicities and the need for dose modification and treatment delays.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB (7), III (13), or IVA (1) treated with carboplatin chemotherapy from 1993 to 2001 were identified. Carboplatin at a dose of 300 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks for an intended six courses was initiated at the start of radiation therapy. No grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia or renal toxicity was observed. Nine patients had delays in chemotherapy administration and/or received a 25% reduction in the dose of chemotherapy based on one or more of the following: thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100000 cells/mcl) (n = 3), granulocytopenia (ANC <1.0) (n = 4), or anemia (hemoglobin <10.0 g/dl) (n = 5). The median carboplatin AUC was 3.9 (range 3.0-5.0). Six patients developed recurrent disease (five local and one distant) with a pelvic control rate of 76% and an overall survival of 71%.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin at a dose of 300 mg/m(2) (equivalent to an AUC of 3.9) on an every 3-week schedule is tolerable with concurrent pelvic radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. The efficacy of carboplatin, compared to cisplatin, as a radiation sensitizer can only be determined in a randomized clinical trial.

Innovations in the treatment of invasive cervical cancer

Invasive cervical cancer is characterized by basement membrane-invading lesions capable of metastasizing through the lymphatic and vascular systems. Treatment methods were reviewed by panelists at the Second International Conference on Cervical Cancer (Houston, TX, April 11-14, 2002), and new opportunities for translational research were discussed. Reviews encompassed hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection or cervical conization in cases with microinvasion and radical trachelectomy with or without lymph node dissection as fertility-sparing surgery. Chemoradiation is used to treat advanced cervical malignancies, and the risks and benefits of radiotherapy are significant. Pelvic exenteration is used to treat certain types of recurrences. Use of the Miami pouch for continent urinary diversion was highlighted. Gynecologic oncologists expect novel in vivo imaging techniques currently being developed to help guide therapy choices within the next decade. The most significant research priorities are large group-randomized trials involving fertility-sparing procedures and the management of microinvasive carcinoma (MICA); better identification of candidates for chemoradiation; and the development of innovative approaches to exenteration. Improving diagnostic technologies, refining the criteria by which therapies are chosen, and preserving fertility remain challenges in selecting the most appropriate treatment for invasive cervical cancer. Research advances in both diagnosis and treatment are expected to improve therapy and outcomes.

A phase I study of carboplatin concurrent with radiation in FIGO stage IIIB cervix uteri carcinoma

PURPOSE

Chemoradiation based on cisplatin, most commonly weekly, is the standard treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer; however, the nephrotoxic potential and the requirement for hydration of cisplatin somewhat restrains its use. The objective of this study was to determine the recommended dose of carboplatin when administered weekly during pelvic radiation (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-four histologically proven, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIB patients were treated with standard pelvic RT concurrently with six weekly applications of carboplatin at the following dose levels: 100 mg/m(2), 116 mg/m(2), 133 mg/m(2), and 150 mg/m(2). Six patients per level were treated. Acute toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. The recommended dose was defined as the one that was one level below the level at which dose-limiting toxicity was present in more than one-third of patients.

RESULTS

Between September 2001 and July 2002, 24 patients were accrued. All but two completed external beam radiotherapy and intracavitary treatment. The treatment was well tolerated. The median number of weekly applications of carboplatin was six, and the mean dose to points A and B was 85.6 Gy (range 75.2-91.6) and 62.9 Gy (range 58.2-74.6), respectively. RT was delivered within 41.7 days (range 33-70). Dose-limiting toxicity (leukopenia and/or neutropenia) was present in 50% of patients treated at the higher dose level (150 mg/m(2)). At the recommended dose of 133 mg/m(2), 33% of patients presented with Grade 3 leukopenia. At treatment completion, 75% of patients had a complete clinical response.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin at 133 mg/m(2), weekly for 6 weeks, is a well tolerated and effective radiosensitizer in cervical cancer patients.

Update on the treatment of advanced cervical cancer

In this review we discuss the most important issues concerning the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Advances in the treatment of cervical cancer are made slowly, but recently the data from five important randomised studies gave rise to an important change in the standard treatment of this disease. For the new standard in advanced cervical cancer, it is clear that chemotherapy should be added to the radiation regimen for an optimal treatment. However, firm conclusions to which drugs or regimens cannot be drawn at this moment.

Phase I study of topotecan and radiation therapy in advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given with external-beam radiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

A prospective Phase I trial of topotecan given with standard external-beam radiotherapy was performed in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Patients were treated with a starting dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) and escalated by 0.25 mg/m(2). Nine patients were treated. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were measured.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with 1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days on Days 1-5 and 22-26 concomitantly with radiotherapy without significant toxicity. Grade III anemia in one case and Grade II leukopenia in two cases were seen in the three patients at this dose level. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan can be safely administered at a dose of 1.0 mg/m(2) during external-beam radiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer

Cervical cancer remains a major health problem worldwide, despite advances in screening. For patients with locally advanced stage disease, failure to obtain local-regional control usually results in death. In an effort to improve local-regional tumour control, neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiation has been tested. Recently, five randomised trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the SouthWest Oncology Group (SWOG) studying cisplatin-based chemoradiation have demonstrated a significant survival advantage. Three of the trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation alone and two trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation with hydroxyurea. In all of the trials, cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation therapy was more effective at reducing the risk of death by 30-50%. Acute toxicities, principally neutropenia and gastrointestinal, were more common with chemoradiation, but were transient and the rates of late complications (complications that persisted or occurred for more than 60 days after the treatment) were similar. Based on the results of these five randomised trials, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) released a Clinical Announcement stating that cisplatin-based chemotherapy, as used in these trials (i.e. concurrently with radiation therapy), as the new standard of therapy for cervical cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy: the new standard care for invasive cervical cancer

Cervical cancer remains a major health problem worldwide, despite advances in screening. For patients with locally advanced stage disease, failure to obtain local-regional control usually results in death. In an effort to improve local-regional tumour control, neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiation have been tested. Recently, 5 randomised trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the Southwest Oncology Group studying cisplatin-based chemoradiation have demonstrated a significant survival advantage. Three of the trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation alone and 2 trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation with hydroxyurea. In all trials, cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation therapy was the more effective therapy, reducing the risk of death by 30 to 50%. Acute toxicities, principally neutropenia and gastrointestinal, were more common with chemoradiation but were transient and rates of late complications were similar between treatment groups. Based on the results of these 5 randomised trials, the National Cancer Institute released a Clinical Announcement stating that cisplatin-based chemotherapy as used in these trials concurrently with radiation therapy should be the new standard of therapy for high risk early stage and locally advanced stage cervical cancer.

Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

In 1986, a protocol comparing primary radiation therapy (RT) plus hydroxyurea (HU) to irradiation plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CF) was activated by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. The goals were to determine the superior chemoradiation regimen and to quantitate the relative toxicities.

METHODS

All patients had biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Patients underwent standard clinical staging studies and their tumors were found to be International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stages IIB, III, or IVA. Negative cytologic washings and para-aortic lymph nodes were required for entry. Patients were randomized to receive either standard whole pelvic RT with concurrent 5-FU infusion and bolus CF or the same RT plus oral HU.

RESULTS

Of 388 randomized patients, 368 were eligible; 177 were randomized to CF and 191 to HU. Adverse effects were predominantly hematologic or gastrointestinal in both regimens. Severe or life-threatening leukopenia was more common in the HU group (24%) than in the CF group (4%). The difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significant in favor of the CF group (P = .033). The sites of progression in the two treatment groups were not substantially different. Survival was significantly better for the patients randomized to CF (P = .018).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix, the combination of 5-FU and CF with RT offers patients better PFS and overall survival than HU, and with manageable toxicity.

Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

On behalf of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, we performed a randomized trial of radiotherapy in combination with three concurrent chemotherapy regimens -- cisplatin alone; cisplatin, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea; and hydroxyurea alone -- in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Women with primary untreated invasive squamous-cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix of stage IIB, III, or IVA, without involvement of the para-aortic lymph nodes, were enrolled. The patients had to have a leukocyte count of at least 3000 per cubic millimeter, a platelet count of at least 100,000 per cubic millimeter, a serum creatinine level no higher than 2 mg per deciliter (177 micromol per liter), and adequate hepatic function. All patients received external-beam radiotherapy according to a strict protocol. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three chemotherapy regimens: 40 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area per week for six weeks (group 1); 50 mg of cisplatin per square meter on days 1 and 29, followed by 4 g of fluorouracil per square meter given as a 96-hour infusion on days 1 and 29, and 2 g of oral hydroxyurea per square meter twice weekly for six weeks (group 2); or 3 g of oral hydroxyurea per square meter twice weekly for six weeks (group 3).

RESULTS

The analysis included 526 women. The median duration of follow-up was 35 months. Both groups that received cisplatin had a higher rate of progression-free survival than the group that received hydroxyurea alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The relative risks of progression of disease or death were 0.57 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.78) in group 1 and 0.55 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.75) in group 2, as compared with group 3. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3, with relative risks of death of 0.61 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.85) and 0.58 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.81), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Regimens of radiotherapy and chemotherapy that contain cisplatin improve the rates of survival and progression-free survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

[Chemoradiotherapy in cancers of the uterine cervix]

Treatment of uterine cervix carcinomas is based on radiotherapy and surgery. Prognosis of advanced carcinoma leads to the proposal of many combinations. Only concurrent radio-chemotherapy demonstrated some interests. Combination of radiotherapy and radiosensitisers failed to demonstrate any advantage and in some instances was associated with an adverse effect. Hydroxyurea and mitomycin C alone or associated were extensively tested without benefit. From modern combinations and recent studies, we could conclude that only cisplatin (and probably its derivates) can be included in future trials.

New techniques in the radiotherapeutic treatment of gynecological malignancies

The management of patients with gynecological malignancies serves as a prominent example of the importance of multi-modality oncologic therapy. Optimal treatment of these patients requires the skillful implementation of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The decision to use simple versus combined modality therapy is crucial and best carried out in centers in which an experienced and coordinated multidisciplinary team is available. In this article, we have reviewed the most recent data regarding the role of radiation therapy in gynecological malignancies and have pointed out those areas where additional confirmatory studies are needed.