Severe axial bending of RNA induced by the U1A binding element present in the 3' untranslated region of the U1A mRNA

Analysis of branched nucleic acid structure using comparative gel electrophoresis

Electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels provides a simple yet powerful means of analyzing the relative disposition of helical arms in branched nucleic acids. The electrophoretic mobility of DNA or RNA with a central discontinuity is determined by the angle subtended between the arms radiating from the branchpoint. In a multi-helical branchpoint, comparative gel electrophoresis can provide a relative measure of all the inter-helical angles and thus the shape and symmetry of the molecule. Using the long-short arm approach, the electrophoretic mobility of all the species with two helical arms that are longer than all others is compared. This can be done as a function of conditions, allowing the analysis of ion-dependent folding of branched DNA and RNA species. Notable successes for the technique include the four-way (Holliday) junction in DNA and helical junctions in functionally significant RNA species such as ribozymes. Many of these structures have subsequently been proved correct by crystallography or other methods, up to 10 years later in the case of the Holliday junction. Just as important, the technique has not failed to date. Comparative gel electrophoresis can provide a window on both fast and slow conformational equilibria such as conformer exchange in four-way DNA junctions. But perhaps the biggest test of the approach has been to deduce the structures of complexes of four-way DNA junctions with proteins. Two recent crystallographic structures show that the global structures were correctly deduced by electrophoresis, proving the worth of the method even in these rather complex systems. Comparative gel electrophoresis is a robust method for the analysis of branched nucleic acids and their complexes.

Global and local dynamics of the U1A polyadenylation inhibition element (PIE) RNA and PIE RNA-U1A complexes

The structure and dynamics of the polyadenylation inhibition element (PIE) RNA, free and bound to the U1A protein, have been examined using time-resolved FRET and 2-aminopurine (2AP) fluorescence. This regulatory RNA, located at the 3' end of the U1A pre-mRNA, adopts a U-shaped structure, with binding sites for a single U1A protein at each bend (box 1 and box 2). The distance between the termini of the arms of the RNA is sensitive to its three-dimensional structure. Using Cy3/Cy5 FRET efficiency to monitor binding of Mg(2+), we show that the PIE RNA binds two Mg(2+) ions, which results in a restriction of its distance distribution of conformations. Local RNA structure probing using 2AP fluorescence shows that the structure of box 2 changes in response to Mg(2+) binding, thus tentatively locating the ion binding sites. Steady-state FRET data show that the distance R between the termini of the PIE RNA stems decreases from 66 A in the free RNA, to 58 A when N-terminal RNA binding domains (RBD1) of U1A are bound, and to 53 A when U1A proteins bind. However, anisotropy measurements indicate that both Cy3 and Cy5 stack on the ends of the RNA. To examine the consequences of the restricted motion of the fluorophores, FRET data are analyzed using two different models of motion and then compared to analogous data from the Cy3/fluorescein FRET pair. We conclude that the error introduced into distance calculations by stacking of the dyes is within the error of our measurements. Distance distributions of the RNA structures show that the intramolecular distance between the arms of the PIE RNA varies on the time scale of the fluorescence measurements; the mean distance is dependent on protein binding, but the breadth of the distributions indicates that the RNA retains structural heterogeneity.

Determinants within an 18-amino-acid U1A autoregulatory domain that uncouple cooperative RNA binding, inhibition of polyadenylation, and homodimerization

The human U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein autoregulates its own production by binding to and inhibiting the polyadenylation of its own pre-mRNA. Previous work demonstrated that a short sequence of U1A protein is essential for autoregulation and contains three distinct activities, which are (i) cooperative binding of two U1A proteins to a 50-nucleotide region of U1A pre-mRNA called polyadenylation-inhibitory element RNA, (ii) formation of a novel homodimerization surface, and (iii) inhibition of polyadenylation by inhibition of poly(A) polymerase (PAP). In this study, we purified and analyzed 11 substitution mutant proteins, each having one or two residues in this region mutated. In 5 of the 11 mutant proteins, we found that particular amino acids associate with one activity but not another, indicating that they can be uncoupled. Surprisingly, in three mutant proteins, these activities were improved upon, suggesting that U1A autoregulation is selected for suboptimal inhibitory efficiency. The effects of these mutations on autoregulatory activity in vivo were also determined. Only U1A and U170K are known to regulate nuclear polyadenylation by PAP inhibition; thus, these results will aid in determining how widespread this type of regulation is. Our molecular dissection of the consequences of conformational changes within an RNP complex presents a powerful example to those studying more complicated pre-mRNA-regulatory systems.

Molecular dynamics simulation studies of induced fit and conformational capture in U1A-RNA binding: do molecular substates code for specificity?

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on stem loop 2 of U1 small nuclear RNA and a construct of the U1A protein were carried out to obtain predictions of the structures for the unbound forms in solution and to elucidate dynamical aspects of induced fit upon binding. A crystal structure of the complex between the U1A protein and stem loop 2 RNA and an NMR structure for the uncomplexed form of the U1A protein are available from Oubridge et al. (Nature, 1994, Vol. 372, pp. 432-438) and Avis et al. (Journal of Molecular Biology, 1996, Vol. 257, pp. 398-411), respectively. As a consequence, U1A-RNA binding is a particularly attractive case for investigations of induced fit in protein-nucleic acid complexation. When combined with the available structural data, the results from simulations indicate that structural adaptation of U1A protein and RNA define distinct mechanisms for induced fit. For the protein, the calculations indicate that induced fit upon binding involves a non-native thermodynamic substate in which the structure is preorganized for binding. In contrast, induced fit of the RNA involves a distortion of the native structure in solution to an unstable form. However, the RNA solution structures predicted from simulation show evidence that structures in which groups of bases are favorably oriented for binding the U1A protein are thermally accessible. These results, which quantify with computational modeling recent proposals on induced fit and conformational capture by Leuillot and Varani (Biochemistry, 2001, Vol. 40, pp. 7947-7956) and by Williamson (Nature Structural Biology, 2000, Vol. 7, pp. 834-837) suggest an important role for intrinsic molecular architecture and substates other than the native form in the specificity of protein-RNA interactions.

Identification of new poly(A) polymerase-inhibitory proteins capable of regulating pre-mRNA polyadenylation

The 3' ends of nearly all eukaryotic pre-mRNAs undergo cleavage and polyadenylation, thereby acquiring a poly(A) tail added by the enzyme poly(A) polymerase (PAP). Two well-characterized examples of regulated poly(A) tail addition in the nucleus consist of spliceosomal proteins, either the U1A or U170K proteins, binding to the pre-mRNA and inhibiting PAP via their PAP regulatory domains (PRDs). These two proteins are the only known examples of this type of gene regulation. On the basis of sequence comparisons, it was predicted that many other proteins, including some members of the SR family of splicing proteins, contain functional PRDs. Here we demonstrate that the putative PRDs found in the SR domains of the SR proteins SRP75 and U2AF65, via fusion to a heterologous MS2 RNA binding protein, specifically and efficiently inhibit PAP in vitro and pre-mRNA polyadenylation in vitro and in vivo. A similar region from the SR domain of SRP40 does not exhibit these activities, indicating that this is not a general property of SR domains. We find that the polyadenylation- and PAP-inhibitory activity of a given polypeptide can be accurately predicted based on sequence similarity to known PRDs and can be measured even if the polypeptides' RNA target is unknown. Our results also indicate that PRDs function as part of a network of interactions within the pre-mRNA processing complex and suggest that this type of regulation will be more widespread than previously thought.

Investigation of a conserved stacking interaction in target site recognition by the U1A protein

Three highly conserved aromatic residues in RNA recognition motifs (RRM) participate in stacking interactions with RNA bases upon binding RNA. We have investigated the contribution of one of these aromatic residues, Phe56, to the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the spliceosomal protein U1A and stem-loop 2 of U1 snRNA. Previous work showed that the aromatic group is important for high affinity binding. Here we probe how mutation of Phe56 affects the kinetics of complex dissociation, the strength of the hydrogen bonds formed between U1A and the base that stacks with Phe56 (A6) and specific target site recognition. Substitution of Phe56 with Trp or Tyr increased the rate of dissociation of the complex, consistent with previously reported results. However, substitution of Phe56 with His decreased the rate of complex association, implying a change in the initial formation of the complex. Simultaneous modification of residue 56 and A6 revealed energetic coupling between the aromatic group and the functional groups of A6 that hydrogen bond to U1A. Finally, mutation of Phe56 to Leu reduced the ability of U1A to recognize stem-loop 2 correctly. Taken together, these experiments suggest that Phe56 contributes to binding affinity by stacking with A6 and participating in networks of energetically coupled interactions that enable this conserved aromatic amino acid to play a complex role in target site recognition.

Folding of branched RNA species

The global structures of branched RNA species are important to their function. Branched RNA species are defined as molecules in which double-helical segments are interrupted by abrupt discontinuities. These include helical junctions of different orders, and base bulges and loops. Common helical junctions are three- and four-way junctions, often interrupted by mispairs or additional nucleotides. There are many interesting examples of functional RNA junctions, including the hammerhead and hairpin ribozymes, and junctions that serve as binding sites for proteins. The junctions display some common structural properties. These include a tendency to undergo pairwise helical stacking and ion-induced conformational transitions. Helical branchpoints can act as key architectural components and as important sites for interactions with proteins. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer as a structural tool for nucleic acids

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer is a spectroscopic method that provides distance information on macromolecules in solution in the range 20-80 A. It is particularly suited to the analysis of the global structure of nucleic acids because the long-range distance information provides constraints when modelling these important structures. The application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to nucleic acid structure has seen a resurgence of interest in the past decade, which continues to increase. An especially exciting development is the recent extension to single-molecule studies.

Spatial orientation and dynamics of the U1A proteins in the U1A-UTR complex

The human U1A protein contains three distinct domains: the N-terminal RBD1 (amino acids 1-101), the C-terminal RBD2 (amino acids 195-282), and the linker region (amino acids 102-194). The RBD1 domains of two U1A proteins bind specifically to two internal loops in the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of its own pre-mRNA. Tryptophan fluorescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer data show that the two RBD2 domains do not interact with any regions of the UTR complex and display an overall tumbling that is uncorrelated from the core of the complex (formed by RBD1-UTR), indicating that the linker regions of the two U1A proteins remain flexible. The two RBD2 domains are separated by an apparent distance greater than 74 A in the UTR complex. The linker region adjacent to the RBD1 domain (103-ERDRKREKRKPKSQETP-119) is supposedly involved in protein-protein interactions (12). A single cysteine, introduced at position 101 or 121 of the U1A protein, was used as a specific attachment site for the fluorophore pair IAEDANS [N'-iodoacetyl-N'-(1-sulfo-5-n-naphthyl)ethylenediamine]/DABMI [4-(dimethylamino)-phenylazophenyl-4'-maleimide]. In the U1A-UTR complex (2:1), the dyes at the 101 position are separated by <R> = approximately 51 A, while the dyes at the 121 position are at an apparent distance <R> = approximately 58 A. The 101-121 crossed distance on adjacent U1A proteins averages to <R> = 55 A. These results suggest that the amino acid sequence 101-121 of the two U1A proteins in the complex are held in proximity to each other in a compact conformation.

Fourteen residues of the U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein are required for homodimerization, cooperative RNA binding, and inhibition of polyadenylation

It was previously shown that the human U1A protein, one of three U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-specific proteins, autoregulates its own production by binding to and inhibiting the polyadenylation of its own pre-mRNA. The U1A autoregulatory complex requires two molecules of U1A protein to cooperatively bind a 50-nucleotide polyadenylation-inhibitory element (PIE) RNA located in the U1A 3' untranslated region. Based on both biochemical and nuclear magnetic resonance structural data, it was predicted that protein-protein interactions between the N-terminal regions (amino acids [aa] 1 to 115) of the two U1A proteins would form the basis for cooperative binding to PIE RNA and for inhibition of polyadenylation. In this study, we not only experimentally confirmed these predictions but discovered some unexpected features of how the U1A autoregulatory complex functions. We found that the U1A protein homodimerizes in the yeast two-hybrid system even when its ability to bind RNA is incapacitated. U1A dimerization requires two separate regions, both located in the N-terminal 115 residues. Using both coselection and gel mobility shift assays, U1A dimerization was also observed in vitro and found to depend on the same two regions that were found in vivo. Mutation of the second homodimerization region (aa 103 to 115) also resulted in loss of inhibition of polyadenylation and loss of cooperative binding of two U1A protein molecules to PIE RNA. This same mutation had no effect on the binding of one U1A protein molecule to PIE RNA. A peptide containing two copies of aa 103 to 115 is a potent inhibitor of polyadenylation. Based on these data, a model of the U1A autoregulatory complex is presented.

Binding of U1A protein to the 3' untranslated region of its pre-mRNA

We have studied the global structure of the U1A 3' untranslated region (UTR) element using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Comparison of a single UTR-box with a series of oligoadenine bulges indicates that the UTR-box introduces a significant kink into the axis of the RNA, and quantification of the results suggests an included bend angle of approximately 100 degrees (i.e. 80 degrees from linear). The complete 3'-UTR element is also severely kinked by the two UTR-boxes. We can observe binding of U1A protein to the 3'-UTR element by a change in the fluorescence anisotropy of Cy3 attached to one of the helical ends. In parallel with the binding, we observe a marked increase in fluoresence resonance energy transfer efficiency between fluorophores attached at the two 5' termini, indicating a significant change in global conformation induced by the binding of the protein.