A P element with a novel fusion of reporters identifies regular, a C2H2 zinc-finger gene downstream of the circadian clock

Induction of Drosophila Behavioral and Molecular Circadian Rhythms by Temperature Steps in Constant Light

In constant light, where Drosophila rhythms are normally disrupted, temperature cycles induce circadian rhythms at both the molecular and behavioral level. The authors investigated the process by which the thermoperiod induces the rhythms using temperature steps. A 10 °C temperature step-up induced a single locomotor activity peak ca 9 h after the temperature transition, whereas a 10 °C step-down induced a strong activity peak ca 24 h after the transition, and the peak recurred for several cycles, suggesting that the underlying clock is reset. Arrhythmic per01, tim 01, dClkJrk, and cyc01 mutant flies failed to show the rhythm after the step-down, suggesting that per, tim, dClk, and cyc are necessary for the step-down—induced rhythm. After the step-up, per01 flies exhibited an activity peak similar to that of wild-type flies, suggesting that the peak can be induced by the step-up in absence of PER. mRNA levels of per, tim , dClk, vri, and Pdp1ε were changed in response to the temperature steps, but the changes differed depending on the direction of temperature steps, suggesting that steps-up and steps-down have different roles in the initiation of the oscillation. Probably, alternating 12-h temperature steps-up and steps-down will induce opposite changes in mRNA levels of clock genes, eventually producing stable molecular oscillations. Although TIM shows responses to temperature consistent with the changes of its mRNA, this is not the case for PER, consistent with posttranscriptional regulation. Changes of the mRNA levels were significantly altered but still observed in per 01 flies but not observed in dClkJrk flies, except for per mRNA. This suggests that dCLK is involved in the temperature-induced changes in the levels of most clock gene mRNA but that per is regulated via a different mechanism.

Mes2, a MADF-containing transcription factor essential for Drosophila development

The development of the Drosophila mesoderm is initiated by the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor twist. We identified a gene encoding a putative transcription factor, mes2, in a screen for essential mesoderm-expressed genes that function downstream of twist. Mes2 protein belongs to a family of 48 Drosophila proteins containing MADF domains. MADF domains exist in worms, flies, and fish. Mes2 is a nuclear protein first produced in trunk and head mesoderm during late gastrulation. At later embryonic stages, mes2 is expressed in glia of the central and peripheral nervous systems, and in tissues derived from the head mesoderm. We have identified a null mutation of mes2 that leads to developmental arrest in first instar larvae. Increased production of Mes2 in multiple embryonic and larval tissues almost always causes lethality. The ubiquitous or epidermal misexpression of mes2 in the embryo causes a dramatic loss of epidermal integrity resulting in the failure of dorsal closure. Our data show that the precise regulation of mes2 expression is critical for normal development in Drosophila and implicate Mes2 in the regulation of essential target genes.

Circadian clocks in antennal neurons are necessary and sufficient for olfaction rhythms in Drosophila

BACKGROUND

The Drosophila circadian clock is controlled by interlocked transcriptional feedback loops that operate in many neuronal and nonneuronal tissues. These clocks are roughly divided into a central clock, which resides in the brain and is known to control rhythms in locomotor activity, and peripheral clocks, which comprise all other clock tissues and are thought to control other rhythmic outputs. We previously showed that peripheral oscillators are required to mediate rhythmic olfactory responses in the antenna, but the identity and relative autonomy of these peripheral oscillators has not been defined.

RESULTS

Targeted ablation of lateral neurons by using apoptosis-promoting factors and targeted clock disruption in antennal neurons with newly developed dominant-negative versions of CLOCK and CYCLE show that antennal neurons, but not central clock cells, are necessary for olfactory rhythms. Targeted rescue of antennal neuron oscillators in cyc(01) flies through wild-type CYCLE shows that these neurons are also sufficient for olfaction rhythms.

CONCLUSIONS

Antennal neurons are both necessary and sufficient for olfaction rhythms, which demonstrates for the first time that a peripheral tissue can function as an autonomous pacemaker in Drosophila. These results reveal fundamental differences in the function and organization of circadian oscillators in Drosophila and mammals and suggest that components of the olfactory signal transduction cascade could be targets of circadian regulation.

Genetics and molecular biology of rhythms in Drosophila and other insects

Application of generic variants (Sections II-IV, VI, and IX) and molecular manipulations of rhythm-related genes (Sections V-X) have been used extensively to investigate features of insect chronobiology that might not have been experimentally accessible otherwise. Most such tests of mutants and molecular-genetic xperiments have been performed in Drosophila melanogaster. Results from applying visual-system variants have revealed that environmental inputs to the circadian clock in adult flies are mediated by external photoreceptive structures (Section II) and also by direct light reception chat occurs in certain brain neurons (Section IX). The relevant light-absorbing molecuLes are rhodopsins and "blue-receptive" cryptochrome (Sections II and IX). Variations in temperature are another clock input (Section IV), as has been analyzed in part by use of molecular techniques and transgenes involving factors functioning near the heart of the circadian clock (Section VIII). At that location within the fly's chronobiological system, approximately a half-dozen-perhaps up to as many as 10-clock genes encode functions that act and interact to form the circadian pacemaker (Sections III and V). This entity functions in part by transcriptional control of certain clock genes' expressions, which result in the production of key proteins that feed back negatively to regulate their own mRNA production. This occurs in part by interactions of such proteins with others that function as transcriptional activators (Section V). The implied feedback loop operates such that there are daily variations in the abundances of products put out by about one-half of the core clock genes. Thus, the normal expression of these genes defines circadian rhythms of their own, paralleling the effects of mutations at the corresponding genetic loci (Section III), which are to disrupt or apparently eliminate clock functioning. The fluctuations in the abundance of gene products are controlled transciptionally and posttranscriptionally. These clock mechanisms are being analyzed in ways that are increasingly complex and occasionally obscure; not all panels of this picture are comprehensive or clear, including problems revolving round the biological meaning or a given features of all this molecular cycling (Section V). Among the complexities and puzzles that have recently arisen, phenomena that stand out are posttranslational modifications of certain proteins that are circadianly regulated and regulating; these biochemical events form an ancillary component of the clock mechanism, as revealed in part by genetic identification of Factors (Section III) that turned out to encode protein kinases whose substrates include other pacemaking polypeptides (Section V). Outputs from insect circadian clocks have been long defined on formalistic and in some cases concrete criteria, related to revealed rhythms such as periodic eclosion and daily fluctuations of locomotion (Sections II and III). Based on the reasoning that if clock genes can regulate circadian cyclings of their own products, they can do the same for genes that function along output pathways; thus clock-regulated genes have been identified in part by virtue of their products' oscillations (Section X). Those studied most intensively have their expression influenced by circadian-pacemaker mutations. The clock-regulated genes discovered on molecular criteria have in some instances been analyzed further in their mutant forms and found to affect certain features of overt whole-organismal rhythmicity (Sections IV and X). Insect chronogenetics touches in part on naturally occurring gene variations that affect biological rhythmicity or (in some cases) have otherwise informed investigators about certain features of the organism's rhythm system (Section VII). Such animals include at least a dozen insect species other than D. melanogaster in which rhythm variants have been encountered (although usually not looked for systematically). The chronobiological "system" in the fruit fly might better be graced with a plural appellation because there is a myriad of temporally related phenomena that have come under the sway of one kind of putative rhythm variant or the other (Section IV). These phenotypes, which range well beyond the bedrock eclosion and locomotor circadian rhythms, unfortunately lead to the creation of a laundry list of underanalyzed or occult phenomena that may or may not be inherently real, whether or not they might be meaningfully defective under the influence of a given chronogenetic variant. However, such mutants seem to lend themselves to the interrogation of a wide variety of time-based attributes-those that fall within the experimental confines of conventionally appreciated circadian rhythms (Sections II, III, VI, and X); and others that consist of 24-hr or nondaily cycles defined by many kinds of biological, physiological, or biochemical parameters (Section IV).

Genome-wide expression analysis in Drosophila reveals genes controlling circadian behavior

In Drosophila, a number of key processes such as emergence from the pupal case, locomotor activity, feeding, olfaction, and aspects of mating behavior are under circadian regulation. Although we have a basic understanding of how the molecular oscillations take place, a clear link between gene regulation and downstream biological processes is still missing. To identify clock-controlled output genes, we have used an oligonucleotide-based high-density array that interrogates gene expression changes on a whole genome level. We found genes regulating various physiological processes to be under circadian transcriptional regulation, ranging from protein stability and degradation, signal transduction, heme metabolism, detoxification, and immunity. By comparing rhythmically expressed genes in the fly head and body, we found that the clock has adapted its output functions to the needs of each particular tissue, implying that tissue-specific regulation is superimposed on clock control of gene expression. Finally, taking full advantage of the fly as a model system, we have identified and characterized a cycling potassium channel protein as a key step in linking the transcriptional feedback loop to rhythmic locomotor behavior.