Bone Conduction and the Middle Ear. In: Puria S, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. The Middle Ear. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 135-69. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6591-1_6]

Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the western rat snake (Pantherophis obsoletus)

Despite the absence of tympanic middle ears, snakes can hear. They are thought to primarily detect substrate vibration via connections between the lower jaw and the inner ear. We used the western rat snake (Pantherophis obsoletus) to determine how vibration is processed in the brain. We measured vibration-evoked potential recordings to reveal sensitivity to low-frequency vibrations. We then used tract tracing combined with immunohistochemistry and Nissl staining to describe the central projections of the papillar branch of the VIIIth nerve. Applications of biotinylated dextran amine to the basilar papilla (homologous to the organ of Corti of mammals) labeled bouton-like terminals in two first-order cochlear nuclei, a rostrolateral nucleus angularis (NA) and a caudomedial nucleus magnocellularis (NM). NA formed a distinct dorsal eminence, consisted of heterogenous cell types, and was parvalbumin positive. NM was smaller and poorly separated from the surrounding vestibular nuclei. NM was distinguished by positive calbindin label and included fusiform and round cells. Thus, the atympanate western rat snake shares similar first-order projections to tympanate reptiles. Auditory pathways may be used for detecting vibration, not only in snakes but also potentially in atympanate early tetrapods.

Contralateral bone conducted sound wave propagation on the skull bones in fresh frozen cadaver

The study aimed to investigate the efficient pathway for BC sound transmission by measuring vibrations on the opposite side of the skull bone, referred to as the mastoid position. The realistic contralateral transmission pathway of bone conduction (BC) vibrations is investigated through each osseous structure in the midlines of the fresh-frozen whole head. BC stimulation is applied to the mastoid using a bone vibrator, and acceleration responses are observed on the contralateral mastoid bone and seven midline points of skull bones using triaxial accelerometers. The study finds that the range showing the highest contralateral transmission efficiency of bone vibration is the intermediate frequency range with contralateral direction. Within this range, a significant amplitude of acceleration response is measured at the face-side points and the back and upper parts of the head. The thesis suggests that signal transmission from the specific midline to the mastoid can be more efficient than the conventional configuration of BC from the mastoid to the mastoid.

Hearing without a tympanic ear

The ability to sense and localize sound is so advantageous for survival that it is difficult to understand the almost 100 million year gap separating the appearance of early tetrapods and the emergence of an impedance-matching tympanic middle ear - which we normally regard as a prerequisite for sensitive hearing on land - in their descendants. Recent studies of hearing in extant atympanate vertebrates have provided significant insights into the ancestral state(s) and the early evolution of the terrestrial tetrapod auditory system. These reveal a mechanism for sound pressure detection and directional hearing in 'earless' atympanate vertebrates that may be generalizable to all tetrapods, including the earliest terrestrial species. Here, we review the structure and function of vertebrate tympanic middle ears and highlight the multiple acquisition and loss events that characterize the complex evolutionary history of this important sensory structure. We describe extratympanic pathways for sound transmission to the inner ear and synthesize findings from recent studies to propose a general mechanism for hearing in 'earless' atympanate vertebrates. Finally, we integrate these studies with research on tympanate species that may also rely on extratympanic mechanisms for acoustic reception of infrasound (<20 Hz) and with studies on human bone conduction mechanisms of hearing.

Optical measurements of eardrum vibrations and sound propagation in the ear canal for the fitting of active middle ear implants

BACKGROUND

Middle ear implants (MEI) are for the medical rehabilitation of the hearing function in case of sound conduction hearing losses as well as cochlear hearing losses and their combinations.

OBJECTIVES

An objective tool to reach the best fitting of the external worn sound processors is essential for patients who do not want or cannot participate in the fitting process.

METHODS

In addition to Laser-Doppler-Vibrometry (LDV) measurement, the sound pressure was measured distant to the eardrum to attain additional information for comparison. Three groups of patients with different middle ear characteristics were examined.

RESULTS

Because of the large spreading of measuring results even within a patient group with similar eardrum and middle ear conditions it is difficult to develop characteristic diagrams which represent the mean values of eardrum displacements with different sound processor adjustments being the base for normative data courses.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The LDV measurements can be used as a tool for fitting sound processors by finding individual maximum eardrum velocities in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8 kHz. In comparison to acoustical measurements the optical measurements have advantages concerning lower variations of measurement values, higher spectral resolution, and robustness against disturbing acoustic noise, especially at low frequencies.

The Effect of Soft Tissue Stimulation on Skull Vibrations and Hearing Thresholds in Humans

HYPOTHESIS

Hearing via soft tissue stimulation involves an osseous pathway.

BACKGROUND

A recent study that measured both hearing thresholds and skull vibrations found that vibratory stimulation of soft tissue led to hearing sensation that correlated with skull vibrations, supporting the hypothesis of an osseous pathway. It is possible, however, that a lower application force of the vibrator on the stimulated soft tissue would not be sufficient to elicit skull vibration suggesting hearing via a nonosseous pathway. The purpose of the present study was to confirm the osseous pathway by measuring skull vibrations and behavioral thresholds using a low application force on a layer of ultrasound gel. Gel was used to mimic soft tissue because of its similar acoustic impedance and to control for variability between participants.

METHODS

Hearing thresholds and the skull vibrations of five patients who were implanted with bone-anchored implants were assessed in two conditions when the bone vibrator was applied on the forehead: 1) direct application with 5N force; 2) through a layer of ultrasound gel with minimal application force. Skull vibrations were measured in both conditions by a laser Doppler vibrometer focused on the bone-anchored implant.

RESULTS

Skull vibrations were present even when minimal application force was applied on soft tissue. The difference in skull vibrations when the vibrator was directly on the forehead compared with the gel condition was consistent with the variability in hearing thresholds between the two conditions.

CONCLUSION

These results reinforce the hypothesis that skull vibrations are involved in hearing when sound is transmitted via either soft tissue or bone.

Strongly directional responses to tones and conspecific calls in the auditory nerve of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko

The configuration of lizard ears, where sound can reach both surfaces of the eardrums, produces a strongly directional ear, but the subsequent processing of sound direction by the auditory pathway is unknown. We report here on directional responses from the first stage, the auditory nerve. We used laser vibrometry to measure eardrum responses in Tokay geckos and in the same animals recorded 117 auditory nerve single fiber responses to free-field sound from radially distributed speakers. Responses from all fibers showed strongly lateralized activity at all frequencies, with an ovoidal directivity that resembled the eardrum directivity. Geckos are vocal and showed pronounced nerve fiber directionality to components of the call. To estimate the accuracy with which a gecko could discriminate between sound sources, we computed the Fisher information (FI) for each neuron. FI was highest just contralateral to the midline, front and back. Thus, the auditory nerve could provide a population code for sound source direction, and geckos should have a high capacity to differentiate between midline sound sources. In brain, binaural comparisons, for example, by IE (ipsilateral excitatory, contralateral inhibitory) neurons, should sharpen the lateralized responses and extend the dynamic range of directionality.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In mammals, the two ears are unconnected pressure receivers, and sound direction is computed from binaural interactions in the brain, but in lizards, the eardrums interact acoustically, producing a strongly directional response. We show strongly lateralized responses from gecko auditory nerve fibers to directional sound stimulation and high Fisher information on either side of the midline. Thus, already the auditory nerve provides a population code for sound source direction in the gecko.

Seismic sensitivity and bone conduction mechanisms enable extratympanic hearing in salamanders

The tympanic middle ear is an adaptive sensory novelty that evolved multiple times in all the major terrestrial tetrapod groups to overcome the impedance mismatch generated when aerial sound encounters the air-skin boundary. Many extant tetrapod species have lost their tympanic middle ears, yet they retain the ability to detect airborne sound. In the absence of a functional tympanic ear, extratympanic hearing may occur via the resonant qualities of air-filled body cavities, sensitivity to seismic vibration, and/or bone conduction pathways to transmit sound from the environment to the ear. We used auditory brainstem response recording and laser vibrometry to assess the contributions of these extratympanic pathways for airborne sound in atympanic salamanders. We measured auditory sensitivity thresholds in eight species and observed sensitivity to low-frequency sound and vibration from 0.05-1.2 kHz and 0.02-1.2 kHz, respectively. We determined that sensitivity to airborne sound is not facilitated by the vibrational responsiveness of the lungs or mouth cavity. We further observed that, although seismic sensitivity probably contributes to sound detection under naturalistic scenarios, airborne sound stimuli presented under experimental conditions did not produce vibrations detectable to the salamander ear. Instead, threshold-level sound pressure is sufficient to generate translational movements in the salamander head, and these sound-induced head vibrations are detectable by the acoustic sensors of the inner ear. This extratympanic hearing mechanism mediates low-frequency sensitivity in vertebrate ears that are unspecialized for the detection of aerial sound pressure, and may represent a common mechanism for terrestrial hearing across atympanic tetrapods.

Infrasonic hearing in birds: a review of audiometry and hypothesized structure-function relationships

The perception of airborne infrasound (sounds below 20 Hz, inaudible to humans except at very high levels) has been documented in a handful of mammals and birds. While animals that produce vocalizations with infrasonic components (e.g. elephants) present conspicuous examples of potential use of infrasound in the context of communication, the extent to which airborne infrasound perception exists among terrestrial animals is unclear. Given that most infrasound in the environment arises from geophysical sources, many of which could be ecologically relevant, communication might not be the only use of infrasound by animals. Therefore, infrasound perception could be more common than currently realized. At least three bird species, each of which do not communicate using infrasound, are capable of detecting infrasound, but the associated auditory mechanisms are not well understood. Here we combine an evaluation of hearing measurements with anatomical observations to propose and evaluate hypotheses supporting avian infrasound detection. Environmental infrasound is mixed with non-acoustic pressure fluctuations that also occur at infrasonic frequencies. The ear can detect such non-acoustic pressure perturbations and therefore, distinguishing responses to infrasound from responses to non-acoustic perturbations presents a great challenge. Our review shows that infrasound could stimulate the ear through the middle ear (tympanic) route and by extratympanic routes bypassing the middle ear. While vibration velocities of the middle ear decline towards infrasonic frequencies, whole-body vibrations - which are normally much lower amplitude than that those of the middle ear in the 'audible' range (i.e. >20 Hz) - do not exhibit a similar decline and therefore may reach vibration magnitudes comparable to the middle ear at infrasonic frequencies. Low stiffness in the middle and inner ear is expected to aid infrasound transmission. In the middle ear, this could be achieved by large air cavities in the skull connected to the middle ear and low stiffness of middle ear structures; in the inner ear, the stiffness of round windows and cochlear partitions are key factors. Within the inner ear, the sizes of the helicotrema and cochlear aqueduct are expected to play important roles in shunting low-frequency vibrations away from low-frequency hair-cell sensors in the cochlea. The basilar papilla, the auditory organ in birds, responds to infrasound in some species, and in pigeons, infrasonic-sensitive neurons were traced back to the apical, abneural end of the basilar papilla. Vestibular organs and the paratympanic organ, a hair cell organ outside of the inner ear, are additional untested candidates for infrasound detection in birds. In summary, this review brings together evidence to create a hypothetical framework for infrasonic hearing mechanisms in birds and other animals.

A model and experimental approach to the middle ear transfer function related to hearing in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae)

At present, there are no direct measures of hearing for any baleen whale (Mysticeti). The most viable alternative to in vivo approaches to simulate the audiogram is through modeling outer, middle, and inner ear functions based on the anatomy and material properties of each component. This paper describes a finite element model of the middle ear for the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) to calculate the middle ear transfer function (METF) to determine acoustic energy transmission to the cochlea. The model was developed based on high resolution computed tomography imaging and direct anatomical measurements of the middle ear components for this mysticete species. Mechanical properties for the middle ear tissues were determined from experimental measurements and published values. The METF for the humpback whale predicted a better frequency range between approximately 15 Hz and 3 kHz or between 200 Hz and 9 kHz based on two potential stimulation locations. Experimental measures of the ossicular chain, tympanic membrane, and tympanic bone velocities showed frequency response characteristics consistent with the model. The predicted best sensitivity hearing ranges match well with known vocalizations of this species.