Inhibition of aldehyde reductase by carboxylic acids

The aldo-keto reductase superfamily and its role in drug metabolism and detoxification

The aldo-keto reductase (AKR) superfamily comprises enzymes that catalyze redox transformations involved in biosynthesis, intermediary metabolism, and detoxification. Substrates of AKRs include glucose, steroids, glycosylation end-products, lipid peroxidation products, and environmental pollutants. These proteins adopt a (beta/alpha)(8) barrel structural motif interrupted by a number of extraneous loops and helixes that vary between proteins and bring structural identity to individual families. The human AKR family differs from the rodent families. Due to their broad substrate specificity, AKRs play an important role in the phase II detoxification of a large number of pharmaceuticals, drugs, and xenobiotics.

Kinetic characteristics of ZENECA ZD5522, a potent inhibitor of human and bovine lens aldose reductase

Aldose reductase (aldehyde reductase 2) catalyses the conversion of glucose to sorbitol, and methylglyoxal to acetol. Treatment with aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) is a potential approach to decrease the development of diabetic complications. The sulphonylnitromethanes are a recently discovered class of aldose reductase inhibitors, first exemplified by ICI215918. We now describe enzyme kinetic characterization of a second sulphonylnitromethane, 3',5'-dimethyl-4'-nitromethylsulphonyl-2-(2-tolyl)acetanilide (ZD5522), which is at least 10-fold more potent against bovine lens aldose reductase in vitro and which also has a greater efficacy for reduction of rat nerve sorbitol levels in vivo (ED95 = 2.8 mg kg-1 for ZD5522 and 20 mg kg-1 for ICI 215918). ZD5522 follows pure noncompetitive kinetics against bovine lens aldose reductase when either glucose or methylglyoxal is varied (K(is) = K(ii) = 7.2 and 4.3 nM, respectively). This contrasts with ICI 215918 which is an uncompetitive inhibitor (K(ii) = 100 nM) of bovine lens aldose reductase when glucose is varied. Against human recombinant aldose reductase, ZD5522 displays mixed noncompetitive kinetics with respect to both substrates (K(is) = 41 nM, K(ii) = 8 nM with glucose and K(is) = 52 nM, K(ii) = 3.8 nM with methylglyoxal). This is the first report of the effects of a sulphonylnitromethane on either human aldose reductase or utilization of methylglyoxal. These results are discussed with reference to a Di Iso Ordered Bi Bi mechanism for aldose reductase, where the inhibitors compete with binding of both the aldehyde substrate and alcohol product. This model may explain why aldose reductase inhibitors follow noncompetitive or uncompetitive kinetics with respect to aldehyde substrates, and X-ray crystallography paradoxically locates an ARI within the substrate binding site. Aldehyde reductase (aldehyde reductase 1) is closely related to aldose reductase. Inhibition of bovine kidney aldehyde reductase by ZD5522 follows uncompetitive kinetics with respect to glucuronate (K(ii) = 39 nM), indicating a selectivity greater than 5-fold for bovine aldose reductase relative to aldehyde reductase.

Inhibition of aldose reductase by (2,6-dimethylphenylsulphonyl)nitromethane: possible implications for the nature of an inhibitor binding site and a cause of biphasic kinetics

Aldose reductase (aldehyde reductase 2, ALR2) is often isolated as a mixture of two forms which are sensitive (ALR2S), or insensitive (ALR2I), to inhibitors. We show that ICI 215918 ((2-6-dimethylphenylsulphonyl)-nitromethane) follows either noncompetitive, or uncompetitive kinetics with respect to aldehyde for ALR2S, or the closely related enzyme, aldehyde reductase (aldehyde reductase 1, ALR1). Similar behaviour is exhibited by two other structural types of aldose reductase inhibitor (ARI), spirohydantoins and acetic acids, when either aldehyde, or NADPH is varied. For ALR2S, we have demonstrated kinetic competition between a sulphonylnitromethane, an acetic acid and a spirohydantoin. Thus, different ARIs probably have overlapping binding sites. Published studies imply that ALR2 follows an ordered mechanism where coenzyme binds first and induces a reversible conformation change (E.NADPH-->E*.NADPH). Reduction of aldehyde appears rate-limited by the step E*.NADP+-->E.NADP+. Spontaneous activation converts ALR2S into ALR2I and increases kcat. This must be associated with acceleration of the rate-determining step. We now propose the following hypothesis to explain characteristics of ARIs. (1) Inhibitors preferentially bind to the E* conformation. (2) The ARI binding site contains residues in common with that for aldehyde substrates. When aldehyde is varied, uncompetitive inhibition arises from association at the site for alcohol product in the E*.NADP+ complex which has little affinity for the substrate. Any competitive inhibition arises from use of the aldehyde site in the E*.NADPH complex. (3) Acceleration of the E*.NADP+-->E.NADP+ step upon activation of ALR2 reduces steady state levels of E* and so decreases sensitivity to ARIs.