Experiment-Guided Molecular Modeling of Protein-Protein Complexes Involving GPCRs

Characterization of Phosphorylation-Dependent Antibody Binding to Cancer-Mutated Linkers of C2H2 Zinc Finger Proteins by Intact Transition Epitope Mapping-Thermodynamic Weak-Force Order Analysis

With Intact Transition Epitope Mapping-Thermodynamic Weak-force Order (ITEM-TWO) analysis in combination with molecular modeling, the phosphorylation-dependent molecular recognition motif of the anti-HpTGEKP antibody has been investigated with binary and ternary component mixtures consisting of antibody and (phospho-) peptides. Amino acid sequences have been selected to match either the antibody's recognition motif or the cancer-related zinc finger protein mutations and phosphorylations of the respective amino acid residues. Upon electrospraying of all the components of the mixtures, that is, hexapeptides, antibody, and intact immune complexes, the produced ions were subjected to mass spectrometric mass filtering. The antibody ions as well as the immune complex ions traversed into the mass spectrometer's collision chamber, whereas paths of unbound peptide ions were blocked prior to entering the collision cell. After dissociation of the multiply charged immune complexes in the gas phase, the complex-released peptide ions were recorded after having traversed the second mass filter. Complex-released peptides were unambiguously identified by their masses using mass analysis with isotope resolution. From the results of our studies with seven (phospho-) peptides with distinct amino acid sequences, which resembled either the antibody's binding motif or mutations, we conclude the following: (i) A negatively charged phospho group, located near the peptide's N-terminus is mandatory for antibody binding when placed on the peptide surface at a precise distance to the C-terminally located positively charged ε-amino group of a lysinyl residue. (ii) A bulky amino acid residue, such as the tyrosinyl residue at the N-terminal position of the (phospho-) threoninyl residue, abolishes antibody binding. (iii) Two closely spaced phospho groups negatively interfere with the surface polarity pattern and abolish antibody binding as well. (iv) Non-phosphorylated peptides are not binding partners of the anti-HpTGEKP antibody.

Capturing Peptide-GPCR Interactions and Their Dynamics

Many biological functions of peptides are mediated through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Upon ligand binding, GPCRs undergo conformational changes that facilitate the binding and activation of multiple effectors. GPCRs regulate nearly all physiological processes and are a favorite pharmacological target. In particular, drugs are sought after that elicit the recruitment of selected effectors only (biased ligands). Understanding how ligands bind to GPCRs and which conformational changes they induce is a fundamental step toward the development of more efficient and specific drugs. Moreover, it is emerging that the dynamic of the ligand–receptor interaction contributes to the specificity of both ligand recognition and effector recruitment, an aspect that is missing in structural snapshots from crystallography. We describe here biochemical and biophysical techniques to address ligand–receptor interactions in their structural and dynamic aspects, which include mutagenesis, crosslinking, spectroscopic techniques, and mass-spectrometry profiling. With a main focus on peptide receptors, we present methods to unveil the ligand–receptor contact interface and methods that address conformational changes both in the ligand and the GPCR. The presented studies highlight a wide structural heterogeneity among peptide receptors, reveal distinct structural changes occurring during ligand binding and a surprisingly high dynamics of the ligand–GPCR complexes.

Docking of peptides to GPCRs using a combination of CABS-dock with FlexPepDock refinement

The structural description of peptide ligands bound to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is important for the discovery of new drugs and deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of life. Here we describe a three-stage protocol for the molecular docking of peptides to GPCRs using a set of different programs: (1) CABS-dock for docking fully flexible peptides; (2) PD2 method for the reconstruction of atomistic structures from C-alpha traces provided by CABS-dock and (3) Rosetta FlexPepDock for the refinement of protein–peptide complex structures and model scoring. We evaluated the proposed protocol on the set of seven different GPCR–peptide complexes (including one containing a cyclic peptide), for which crystallographic structures are available. We show that CABS-dock produces high resolution models in the sets of top-scored models. These sets of models, after reconstruction to all-atom representation, can be further improved by Rosetta high-resolution refinement and/or minimization, leading in most of the cases to sub-Angstrom accuracy in terms of interface root-mean-square-deviation measure.

Yak OXGR1 promotes fibroblast proliferation via the PI3K/AKT pathways

Oxoglutarate receptor 1 (OXGR1), as one of the intermediates in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), plays a crucial role in the citric acid cycle receptor of α-ketoglutarate and metabolism. GPCR can control the cell proliferation by regulating the downstream signaling of G protein signaling pathways. The PI3K/AKT pathway transmits the downstream signals of GPCRs and receptor tyrosine kinases. However, the specific role of OXGR1 promoting cell proliferation and differentiation are still unknown. In current study, the over-expression vector and knockdown sequence of yak OXGR1 were transfected into yak fibroblasts, and the effects were detected by a series of assays. The results revealed that OXGR1 expression in yak lung parenchyma tissue was significantly higher than that of other tissues. In yak fibroblasts, the upregulated expression of OXGR1 resulted in activating the PIK3CG (downstream signal) of the PI3K/AKT1 pathway that can upregulated the expression of proliferation genes ( CDK1, PCNA, and CyclinD1) and promote cell proliferation. Conversely, the downregulated expression of OXGR1 inhibited cell proliferation via PI3K/AKT1 pathway. Cell cycle and cell proliferation assays demonstrated that over-expression of OXGR1 can enhanced the DNA synthesis and promoted yak fibroblasts proliferation. While the conversely, knockdown of OXGR1 can decreased DNA synthesis and inhibited cell proliferation. These results illustrated that changes of OXGR1 expression can trigger the fibroblasts proliferation via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which indicating that OXGR1 is a novel regulator for cell proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, these results provide evidence supporting the functional role of GPCRs-PI3K-AKT1 and OXGR1 in cell proliferation.

Modeling the complete chemokine-receptor interaction

Chemokines are soluble, secreted proteins that induce chemotaxis of leukocytes and other cells. Migratory cells can sense the chemokine concentration gradient following chemokine binding and activation of chemokine receptors, a subset of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. Chemokine receptor signaling plays a central role in cell migration during inflammatory responses as well as in cancer and other diseases. Given their important role in mediating essential pathologic and physiologic processes, chemokines and their receptors are attractive targets for therapeutic development. A better understanding of the molecular basis of chemokine-GPCR interactions will aid in the understanding of the mechanistic basis for chemokine function in disease-related processes, as well as aid in the design of new therapeutics. High resolution protein structures are critical for determining these mechanisms and investigating the interactions between approximately 50 chemokines and 20 chemokine receptors. Currently, three unique structures of chemokine-GPCR complexes have been determined and have greatly broadened our knowledge of this large protein-protein interaction. While these structures represent only a small fraction of clinically relevant chemokines and receptors, they can be exploited as scaffolds for homology modeling to understand the chemokine-GPCR interactions. This chapter presents a specialized methodology to construct and validate models of chemokine-GPCR complexes using the Rosetta software suite.

Chemokines and their receptors: insights from molecular modeling and crystallography

Chemokines are small secreted proteins that direct cell migration in development, immunity, inflammation, and cancer. They do so by binding and activating specific G protein coupled receptors on the surface of migrating cells. Despite the importance of receptor:chemokine interactions, their structural basis remained unclear for a long time. In 2015, the first atomic resolution insights were obtained with the publication of X-ray structures for two distantly related receptors bound to chemokines. In conjunction with experiment-guided molecular modeling, the structures suggest a conserved receptor:chemokine complex architecture, while highlighting the diverse details and functional roles of individual interaction epitopes. Novel findings promote the development and detailed structural interpretation of the canonical two-site hypothesis of receptor:chemokine recognition, and suggest new avenues for pharmacological modulation of chemokine receptors.

Disulfide Trapping for Modeling and Structure Determination of Receptor: Chemokine Complexes

Despite the recent breakthrough advances in GPCR crystallography, structure determination of protein-protein complexes involving chemokine receptors and their endogenous chemokine ligands remains challenging. Here, we describe disulfide trapping, a methodology for generating irreversible covalent binary protein complexes from unbound protein partners by introducing two cysteine residues, one per interaction partner, at selected positions within their interaction interface. Disulfide trapping can serve at least two distinct purposes: (i) stabilization of the complex to assist structural studies and/or (ii) determination of pairwise residue proximities to guide molecular modeling. Methods for characterization of disulfide-trapped complexes are described and evaluated in terms of throughput, sensitivity, and specificity toward the most energetically favorable crosslinks. Due to abundance of native disulfide bonds at receptor:chemokine interfaces, disulfide trapping of their complexes can be associated with intramolecular disulfide shuffling and result in misfolding of the component proteins; because of this, evidence from several experiments is typically needed to firmly establish a positive disulfide crosslink. An optimal pipeline that maximizes throughput and minimizes time and costs by early triage of unsuccessful candidate constructs is proposed.