Neuroprotective effects of riluzole in neurotrauma models: a review

Novel pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: Pediatric considerations

BACKGROUND

Pediatric anxiety disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are common, impairing, and often undertreated. Moreover, many youth do not respond to standard, evidence-based psychosocial or psychopharmacologic treatment. An increased understanding of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate neurotransmitter systems has created opportunities for novel intervention development for pediatric GAD.

METHODS

This narrative review examines potential candidates for pediatric GAD: eszopiclone, riluzole, eglumegad (LY354740), pimavanserin, agomelatine.

RESULTS

The pharmacology, preclinical data, clinical trial findings and known side effects of eszopiclone, riluzole, eglumegad (LY354740), pimavanserin, agomelatine, are reviewed, particularly with regard to their potential therapeutic relevance to pediatric GAD.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding numerous challenges, some of these agents represent potential candidate drugs for pediatric GAD. Further treatment development studies of agomelatine, eszopiclone, pimavanserin and riluzole for pediatric GAD also have the prospect of informing the understanding of GABAergic and glutamatergic function across development.

The effect of Riluzole on functional recovery of locomotion in the rat sciatic nerve crush model

PURPOSE

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is common disorder that represents more than 3 % of all traumatic injury cases. One type of PNI, sciatic nerve injury, leads to considerable motoneuron dysfunction. Because Riluzole is clinically approved for the treatment of motoneuron disease, we evaluated whether Riluzole treatment could enhance the nerve regeneration process and improve functional outcome after sciatic nerve crush in rats.

METHODS

In acute treatment groups, a single dose of Riluzole (6 and 8 mg/kg) was administered intra-peritoneally 15 min after the crush nerve injury. In the chronic treatment groups, animals were treated with Riluzole (4 and 6 mg/kg/d) for 8 days. Sciatic functional index (SFI) was evaluated for 9 weeks after injury. Furthermore, electrophysiological and morphometric evaluations were performed at the 9th week following injury.

RESULTS

Acute and chronic administrations of Riluzole immediately after sciatic nerve crush result in significantly delayed regeneration and reduced motor function outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that early administration of even a single dose of Riluzole after sciatic nerve crush injury can delay motor function recovery. This effect may not depend on its anti-nociceptive activity.

MRI evidence that glibenclamide reduces acute lesion expansion in a rat model of spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental, controlled, animal study.

OBJECTIVES

To use non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to corroborate invasive studies showing progressive expansion of a hemorrhagic lesion during the early hours after spinal cord trauma and to assess the effect of glibenclamide, which blocks Sur1-Trpm4 channels implicated in post-traumatic capillary fragmentation, on lesion expansion.

SETTING

Baltimore.

METHODS

Adult female Long-Evans rats underwent unilateral impact trauma to the spinal cord at C7, which produced ipsilateral but not contralateral primary hemorrhage. In series 1 (six control rats and six administered glibenclamide), hemorrhagic lesion expansion was characterized using MRI at 1 and 24 h after trauma. In series 2, hemorrhagic lesion size was characterized on coronal tissue sections at 15 min (eight rats) and at 24 h after trauma (eight control rats and eight administered glibenclamide).

RESULTS

MRI (T2 hypodensity) showed that lesions expanded 2.3±0.33-fold (P<0.001) during the first 24 h in control rats, but only 1.2±0.07-fold (P>0.05) in glibenclamide-treated rats. Measuring the areas of hemorrhagic contusion on tissue sections at the epicenter showed that lesions expanded 2.2±0.12-fold (P<0.001) during the first 24 h in control rats, but only 1.1±0.05-fold (P>0.05) in glibenclamide-treated rats. Glibenclamide treatment was associated with significantly better neurological function (unilateral BBB scores) at 24 h in both the ipsilateral (median scores, 9 vs 0; P<0.001) and contralateral (median scores, 12 vs 2; P<0.001) hindlimbs.

CONCLUSION

MRI is an accurate non-invasive imaging biomarker of lesion expansion and is a sensitive measure of the ability of glibenclamide to reduce lesion expansion.

The Sur1-Trpm4 Channel in Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major unsolved challenge in medicine. Impact trauma to the spinal cord shears blood vessels, causing an immediate 'primary hemorrhage'. During the hours following trauma, the region of hemorrhage enlarges progressively, with delayed or 'secondary hemorrhage' adding to the primary hemorrhage, and effectively doubling its volume. The process responsible for the secondary hemorrhage that results in early expansion of the hemorrhagic lesion is termed 'progressive hemorrhagic necrosis' (PHN). PHN is a dynamic process of auto destruction whose molecular underpinnings are only now beginning to be elucidated. PHN results from the delayed, progressive, catastrophic failure of the structural integrity of capillaries. The resulting 'capillary fragmentation' is a unique, pathognomonic feature of PHN. Recent work has implicated the Sur1-Trpm4 channel that is newly upregulated in penumbral microvessels as being required for the development of PHN. Targeting the Sur1-Trpm4 channel by gene deletion, gene suppression, or pharmacological inhibition of either of the two channel subunits, Sur1 or Trpm4, yields exactly the same effects histologically and functionally, and exactly the same unique, pathognomonic phenotype - the prevention of capillary fragmentation. The potential advantage of inhibiting Sur1-Trpm4 channels using glibenclamide is a highly promising strategy for ameliorating the devastating sequelae of spinal cord trauma in humans.

Comparative effects of glibenclamide and riluzole in a rat model of severe cervical spinal cord injury

Both glibenclamide and riluzole reduce necrosis and improve outcome in rat models of spinal cord injury (SCI). In SCI, gene suppression experiments show that newly upregulated sulfonylurea receptor 1 (Sur1)-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channels in microvascular endothelial cells are responsible for "persistent sodium currents" that cause capillary fragmentation and "progressive hemorrhagic necrosis". Glibenclamide is a potent blocker of Sur1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channels (IC(50), 6-48 nM). Riluzole is a pleotropic drug that blocks "persistent sodium currents" in neurons, but in SCI, its molecular mechanism of action is uncertain. We hypothesized that riluzole might block the putative pore-forming subunits of Sur1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channels, Trpm4. In patch clamp experiments, riluzole blocked Sur1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channels in endothelial cells and heterologously expressed Trpm4 (IC(50), 31 μM). Using a rat model of cervical SCI associated with high mortality, we compared the effects of glibenclamide and riluzole administered beginning at 3h and continuing for 7 days after impact. During the acute phase, both drugs reduced capillary fragmentation and progressive hemorrhagic necrosis, and both prevented death. At 6 weeks, modified (unilateral) Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan locomotor scores were similar, but measures of complex function (grip strength, rearing, accelerating rotarod) and tissue sparing were significantly better with glibenclamide than with riluzole. We conclude that both drugs act similarly, glibenclamide on the regulatory subunit, and riluzole on the putative pore-forming subunit of the Sur1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channel. Differences in specificity, dose-limiting potency, or in spectrum of action may account for the apparent superiority of glibenclamide over riluzole in this model of severe SCI.

Emerging treatment options for spinal muscular atrophy

The motor neuron disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is one of the leading genetic killers of infants worldwide. SMA is caused by mutation of the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene and deficiency of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. All patients retain one or more copies of the SMN2 gene, which (by producing a small amount of the SMN protein) rescues embryonic lethality and modifies disease severity. Rapid progress continues in dissecting the cellular functions of the SMN protein, but the mechanisms linking SMN deficiency with dysfunction and loss of functioning motor units remain poorly defined. Clinically, SMA should to be distinguished from other neuromuscular disorders, and the diagnosis can be readily confirmed with genetic testing. Quality of life and survival of SMA patients are improved with aggressive supportive care including optimized respiratory and nutritional care and management of scoliosis and contractures. Because SMA is caused by inadequate amounts of SMN protein, one aim of current SMA therapeutics development is to increase SMN protein levels in SMA patients by activating SMN2 gene expression and/or increasing levels of full-length SMN2 transcripts. Several potential therapeutic compounds are currently being studied in clinical trials in SMA patients.

Riluzole in the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders

Recent advances implicate amino acid neurotransmission in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood and anxiety disorders. Riluzole, which is approved and marketed for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, is thought to be neuroprotective through its modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission. Riluzole has multiple molecular actions in vitro; the two that have been documented to occur at physiologically realistic drug concentrations and are therefore most likely to be clinically relevant are inhibition of certain voltage-gated sodium channels, which can lead to reduced neurotransmitter release, and enhanced astrocytic uptake of extracellular glutamate.Although double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are lacking, several open-label trials have suggested that riluzole, either as monotherapy or as augmentation of standard therapy, reduces symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, unipolar and bipolar depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. In studies of psychiatrically ill patients conducted to date, the drug has been quite well tolerated; common adverse effects include nausea and sedation. Elevation of liver function tests is common and necessitates periodic monitoring, but has been without clinical consequence in studies conducted to date in psychiatric populations. Case reports suggest utility in other conditions, including trichotillomania and self-injurious behaviour associated with borderline personality disorder. Riluzole may hold promise for the treatment of several psychiatric conditions, possibly through its ability to modulate pathologically dysregulated glutamate levels, and merits further investigation.