Concentration/response effect of 2,2', 4,4', 5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl on cell-cell communication in vitro: assessment by fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching ("FRAP")

Applicability of Scrape Loading-Dye Transfer Assay for Non-Genotoxic Carcinogen Testing

Dysregulation of gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) is recognized as one of the key hallmarks for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTxC). Currently, there is a demand for in vitro assays addressing the gap junction hallmark, which would have the potential to eventually become an integral part of an integrated approach to the testing and assessment (IATA) of NGTxC. The scrape loading-dye transfer (SL-DT) technique is a simple assay for the functional evaluation of GJIC in various in vitro cultured mammalian cells and represents an interesting candidate assay. Out of the various techniques for evaluating GJIC, the SL-DT assay has been used frequently to assess the effects of various chemicals on GJIC in toxicological and tumor promotion research. In this review, we systematically searched the existing literature to gather papers assessing GJIC using the SL-DT assay in a rat liver epithelial cell line, WB-F344, after treating with chemicals, especially environmental and food toxicants, drugs, reproductive-, cardio- and neuro-toxicants and chemical tumor promoters. We discuss findings derived from the SL-DT assay with the known knowledge about the tumor-promoting activity and carcinogenicity of the assessed chemicals to evaluate the predictive capacity of the SL-DT assay in terms of its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for identifying carcinogens. These data represent important information with respect to the applicability of the SL-DT assay for the testing of NGTxC within the IATA framework.

Quantitative determination of gap junction intercellular communication using flow cytometric measurement of fluorescent dye transfer

Gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) is involved in several aspects of normal cell behaviour, and disturbances in this type of communication have been associated with many pathological conditions. Reliable and accurate methods for the determination of GJIC are therefore important in studies of cell biology. (Tomasetto, C., Neveu, M.J., Daley, J., Horan, P.K. and Sager, R. (1993) Journal of Cell Biology, 122, 157-167) reported some years ago the use of flow cytometer to determine transfer between cells of a mobile dye, calcein, as a measure of cell communication through gap junctions. In spite of this being a method with potential for quantitative and reliable determination of GJIC, it has been modestly used, possibly due to technical difficulties. In the present work we have illustrated several ways to use flow cytometric data to express cell communication through gap junctions. The recipient cells were pre-stained with the permanent lipophilic dye PKH26, and the donor cell population were loaded with the gap junction permeable dye, calcein. We show that the method may be used to measure the effect of chemicals on GJIC, and that the information is reliable, objective and reproducible due to the large number of cells studied. The data may give additional information to that obtained with other methods, since the effect observed will be on the establishment of cell communication as compared to what is observed for microinjection or scrape loading, where the effect is on already established communication. This is probably the reason for the more potent effects of DMSO on GJIC measured by the present method than on already existing GJIC measured by microinjection or quantitative scrape loading. We also show that the problem related to the mobile dye calcein not being fixable with aldehydes will not affect the results as long as the cells are kept on ice in the dark and analysed by flow cytometer within the first hours after formalin cell fixation.

Cell culture assays for chemicals with tumor-promoting or tumor-inhibiting activity based on the modulation of intercellular communication

The ability of chemicals with tumor-promoting or tumor-inhibiting activity to modulate gap junctional intercellular communication is reviewed. The two most extensively used types of assays for screening tests are (1) metabolic cooperation assays involving exchange between cells of precursors of nucleic acid synthesis and (2) dye-transfer assays that measure exchange of fluorescent dye from loaded cells to adjacent cells. About 300 substances of different biological activities have been studied using various assays. For tumor promoters/epigenetic carcinogens, metabolic cooperation assays have a sensitivity of 62% and dye-transfer assays 60%. Thirty percent of DNA-reactive carcinogens also possess the ability to uncouple cells. The complete estimation of the predictive power of these assays could not be made because the majority of the substances studied for intercellular communication effects in vitro have not yet been studied for promoting activity in vivo. Both metabolic cooperation assays and dye transfer assays respond well to the following classes of substances: phorbol esters, organochlorine pesticides, polybrominated biphenyls, promoters for urinary bladder, some biological toxins, peroxisome proliferators, and some complex mixtures. Results of in vitro assays for such tumor promoters/nongenotoxic carcinogens, such as some bile acids, some peroxides, alkanes, some hormones, mineral dusts, ascorbic acid, okadaic acid, and benz(e)pyrene, do not correlate with the data of in vivo two-stage or complete carcinogenesis. Enhancement of intercellular communication was found for 18 chemicals. Among these, cAMP, retinoids, and carotenoids have demonstrated inhibition of carcinogenesis. We examine a number of factors that are important for routine screening, including the requirement for biotransformation for some agents to exert effects on gap junctions. We also discuss the mechanisms of tumor promoter and tumor inhibitor effects on gap junctional permeability, including influences of protein kinase activation, changes in proton and Ca2+ intracellular concentrations, and effects of oxy radical production.