A novel purification of ferric citrate receptor (FecA) from Escherichia coli UT5600 and further characterization of its binding activity

Structural evidence for iron-free citrate and ferric citrate binding to the TonB-dependent outer membrane transporter FecA

Escherichia coli possesses a TonB-dependent transport system, which exploits the iron-binding capacity of citrate and its natural abundance. Here, we describe three structures of the outer membrane ferric citrate transporter FecA: unliganded and complexed with iron-free or diferric dicitrate. We show the structural mechanism for discrimination between the iron-free and ferric siderophore: the binding of diferric dicitrate, but not iron-free dicitrate alone, causes major conformational rearrangements in the transporter. The structure of FecA bound with iron-free dicitrate represents the first structure of a TonB-dependent transporter bound with an iron-free siderophore. Binding of diferric dicitrate to FecA results in changes in the orientation of the two citrate ions relative to each other and in their interactions with FecA, compared to the binding of iron-free dicitrate. The changes in ligand binding are accompanied by conformational changes in three areas of FecA: two extracellular loops, one plug domain loop and the periplasmic TonB-box motif. The positional and conformational changes in the siderophore and transporter initiate two independent events: ferric citrate transport into the periplasm and transcription induction of the fecABCDE transport genes. From these data, we propose a two-step ligand recognition event: FecA binds iron-free dicitrate in the non-productive state or first step, followed by siderophore displacement to form the transport-competent, diferric dicitrate-bound state in the second step.

Surface loop motion in FepA

Using a lysine-specific cleavable cross-linking reagent ethylene glycolbis(sulfosuccimidylsuccinate) (Sulfo-EGS), we studied conformational motion in the surface loops of Escherichia coli FepA during its transport of the siderophore ferric enterobactin. Site-directed mutagenesis determined that Sulfo-EGS reacted with two lysines, K332 and K483, and at least two other unidentified Lys residues in the surface loops of the outer membrane protein. The reagent cross-linked K483 in FepA L7 to either K332 in L5, forming a product that we designated band 1, or to the major outer membrane proteins OmpF, OmpC, and OmpA, forming band 2. Ferric enterobactin binding to FepA did not prevent modification of K483 by Sulfo-EGS but blocked its cross-linking to OmpF/C and OmpA and reduced its coupling to K332. These data show that the loops of FepA undergo conformational changes in vivo, with an approximate magnitude of 15 A, from a ligand-free open state to a ligand-bound closed state. The coupling of FepA L7 to OmpF, OmpC, or OmpA was TonB independent and was unaffected by the uncouplers CCCP (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone) and DNP (2,4-dinitrophenol) but completely inhibited by cyanide.

Identification of a 29 kDa protein in the envelope of Mycobacterium smegmatis as a putative ferri-exochelin receptor

Evidence of a direct association between ferri-exochelin, the major extracellular siderophore of Mycobacterium smegmatis, and a 29 kDa protein has been obtained by three separate methods. (1) Direct binding of 55Fe(III)-exochelin by the 29 kDa protein in an envelope preparation from iron-deficient cells was demonstrated by the extraction of a complex with the non-denaturing detergent CHAPS, and subsequent CHAPS-PAGE and autoradiography. (2) Affinity chromatography on a chemically synthesized ferri-exochelin-Sepharose 4B matrix led to the retention of the 29 kDa protein and a 25 kDa protein. The smaller protein was partially eluted with 1 mM ferri-exochelin although it did not form a stable complex with ferri-exochelin. The 29 kDa protein could not be eluted from the affinity matrix with 1 mM ferri-exochelin either alone or with 1 M NaCl. Only 2% (w/v) SDS could do this, but resulted in protein denaturation. (3) Incubation of 55Fe-exochelin with CHAPS-solubilized envelope proteins in free solution followed by ion-exchange chromatography resolved three radioactive peaks; subsequent analysis by SDS-PAGE showed that the peak with the highest 55Fe-binding activity per unit protein contained both the 29 and 25 kDa proteins. A direct association was demonstrated between the 29 kDa protein and 55Fe-exochelin by gel filtration. The evidence suggests that the 29 kDa iron-regulated envelope protein of M. smegmatis is a ferri-exochelin-binding protein and that the 25 kDa protein, which corresponds in size to a previously reported iron-regulated envelope protein in this bacterium, may have a role in the formation or maintenance of this complex. Proteins extracted from the cell envelope of iron-deficient M. smegmatis with CHAPS were dialysed to remove the detergent, incorporated into liposome suspensions and then incubated with 55Fe(III)-exochelin. This increased the retention of 55Fe by 133-fold compared to proteins not placed in liposomes. Retention of 55Fe was dependent upon the protein loading of the liposomes. Gel filtration confirmed that the iron was retained by these vesicles and even after dialysis the majority of 55Fe was still retained by the vesicles. Re-solubilization of the labelled proteo-liposomes in various detergents gave limited recovery of a ferri-exochelin-protein complex. Attempts to resolve this complex by Triton X-100 PAGE led to separation of the two entities. The complex was stable, however, in a CHAPS-PAGE system.

Binding characterization of the iron transport receptor from the outer membrane of Escherichia coli (FepA): differentiation between FepA and FecA

The dissociation constants for the binding of ferric enterobactin with FepA and FecA are quantitated with displacement experiments. It is found that Kd for FepA is 12 times lower than the one for FecA. This indicates that FepA is an high-affinity receptor while FecA binds ferric enterobactin with a lower affinity. Monoclonal antibodies specific for binding epitopes of FepA inhibit the binding of ferric enterobactin with purified FepA. These same antibodies do not inhibit the binding of ferric enterobactin with purified FecA. This indicates that the binding epitopes in FecA and FepA are different.