Gemcitabine and radiosensitization in human tumor cells

Current and future targeted alpha particle therapies for osteosarcoma: Radium-223, actinium-225, and thorium-227

Osteosarcoma is a high-grade sarcoma characterized by osteoid formation, nearly universal expression of IGF1R and with a subset expressing HER-2. These qualities provide opportunities for the use of the alpha particle-emitting isotopes to provide targeted radiation therapy via alpha particles precisely to bone-forming tumors in addition to IFG1R or Her-2 expressing metastases. This review will detail experience using the alpha emitter radium-223 (²²³Ra, tradename Xofigo), that targets bone formation, in osteosarcoma, specifically related to patient selection, use of gemcitabine for radio-sensitization, and using denosumab to increasing the osteoblastic phenotype of these cancers. A case of an inoperable left upper lobe vertebral-paraspinal-mediastinal osteoblastic lesion treated successfully with ²²³Ra combined with gemcitabine is described. Because not all areas of osteosarcoma lesions are osteoblastic, but nearly all osteosarcoma cells overexpress IGF1R, and some subsets expressing Her-2, the anti-IGF1R antibody FPI-1434 linked to actinium-225 (²²⁵Ac) or the Her-2 antibody linked to thorium-227 (²²⁷Th) may become other means to provide targeted alpha particle therapy against osteosarcoma (NCT03746431 and NCT04147819).

An HDAC9-associated immune-related signature predicts bladder cancer prognosis

Background

The close relationship between histone deacetylase 9 (HDAC9) and immunity has attracted attention. We constructed an immune signature for HDAC9, a vital epigenetic modification, to predict the survival status and treatment benefits in bladder cancer (BC).

Methods

An exhaustive analysis of HDAC9 and immunology via the tumor and immune system interaction database (TISIDB) was performed, and an immune prognostic risk signature was developed based on genes enriched in the top five immune-related pathways under high HDAC9 status. Comprehensive analysis of survival curves and Cox regression were used to estimate the effectiveness of the risk signature. The relationship between immunological characteristics and the risk score was evaluated, and the mechanisms were also explored.

Results

In the TISIDB, HDAC9 was closely related to various immunological characteristics. The risk signature was obtained based on genes related to prognosis enriched in the top five immune-related pathways under high HDAC9 status. The survival rate of the high-risk BC patients was poor. The risk score was closely related to multiple immunological characteristics, drug sensitivity, immunotherapy benefits and biofunctions.

Conclusion

An immune-related prognostic signature established for HDAC9 expression status could independently predict the prognosis of BC patients. The use of this signature could help clinicians make personalized treatment decisions.

Patients Lung Derived Tumoroids (PLDTs) to model therapeutic response

Preclinical lung cancer models are essential for a basic understanding of lung cancer biology and its translation into efficient treatment options for affected patients. Lung cancer cell lines and xenografts derived directly from human lung tumors have proven highly valuable in fundamental oncology research and anticancer drug discovery. Both models inherently comprise advantages and caveats that have to be accounted for. Recently, we have enabled reliable in vitro culture techniques from lung cancer biopsies as Patients Lung Derived Tumoroids (PLDTs). This breakthrough provides the possibility of high-throughput drug screening covering the spectrum of lung cancer phenotypes seen clinically. We have adapted and optimized our in vitro three-dimensional model as a preclinical lung cancer model to recapitulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) using matrix reconstitution. Hence, we developed directly PLDTs to screen for chemotherapeutics and radiation treatment. This original model will enable precision medicine to become a reality, allowing a given patient sample to be screened for effective ex vivo therapeutics, aiming at tailoring of treatments specific to that individual. Hence, this tool can enhance clinical outcomes and avoid morbidity due to ineffective therapies.

Phase Ib trial of gemcitabine with yttrium-90 in patients with hepatic metastasis of pancreatobiliary origin

Background

Gemcitabine, a chemotherapy for hepatic metastasis with pancreatic cancer (PC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) origin, may radiosensitize the targeted tumor cells for yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE). This clinical trial was designed to investigate the effects of a combination of 90Y-RE and gemcitabine in hepatic metastasis of PC or ICC origin.

Methods

Fourteen patients who had histopathologic diagnosis of unresectable hepatic metastasis of PC or ICC origin were enrolled into the open-label phase Ib clinical trial. Induction dose of gemcitabine on day 1 was followed by 90Y-RE on day 2 with predetermined doses of gemcitabine to follow till week 12. Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with 90Y-RE, associated toxicities and hepatic progression free survival (HPFS) were assessed. The tumor response rate was evaluated using both RECIST and PERCIST criteria.

Results

Eight patients met the study criteria; three with PC and five with ICC. The mean age of the patients was 69.4 years. Seven out of 8 patients tolerated predetermined gemcitabine regime (dose level 1 at 400 mg/m² and dose level 2 at 600 mg/m²). All of the patients developed grade 1 toxicities. Three patients (37.5%) had grade 2 hepatobiliary toxicity and one patient (12.5%) had grade 3 hepatobiliary toxicity, who was hospitalized for a short-term. The median HPFS was 8.7 months for all patients. The objective response rate was 62%.

Conclusions

A combination of 90Y-RE and gemcitabine at 600 mg/m² is a safe and potential treatment option for hepatic metastasis of pancreaticobiliary origin.

RS 504393 inhibits M-MDSCs recruiting in immune microenvironment of bladder cancer after gemcitabine treatment

Bladder cancer (BC) is a malignant tumor of urinary epithelium. Gemcitabine is an introduced treatment for BC and also has immunomodulatory function, but the immunoregulation mechanism is not clear. In this study, we found that gemcitabine-treated BC cell recruited more monocyte-myeloid-derived suppressed cells (M-MDSCs), which played a significant role in immune suppression and contributed to cancer progression. We found that this phenomenon was induced by Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), an M-MDSCs recruitment related monomeric polypeptide. Gemcitabine treatment promotes the generation of CCL2 and CCL2 could attach to C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) to recruit M-MDSCs. We used RS 504393, a selective CCR2 antagonist, to inhibit the recruitment of M-MDSCs. RS 504393 improved the prognosis by blocking chemotaxis of M-MDSCs, and this finding sheds lights on how to prevent and alleviate the side effects occurred on the gemcitabine-treated BC patients.

Metabolic Mechanisms and a Rational Combinational Application of Carboxyamidotriazole in Fighting Pancreatic Cancer Progression after Chemotherapy

The anticancer and anti-inflammatory effects of carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) have been demonstrated in several studies, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This study showed that CAI caused metabolic reprogramming of pancreatic cancer cells. The inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative metabolism by CAI led to increased glutamine-dependent reductive carboxylation and enhanced glycolytic metabolism. The presence of environmental substances that affect cellular metabolism, such as glutamine and pyruvate, attenuated the anticancer efficacy of CAI. Based on the action of CAI: 1) when glutamine was removed, the NAD+/NADH ratio was decreased, the synthesis of cellular aspartate was reduced, and autophagy flux was blocked; and 2) when glycolysis was pharmacologically inhibited, the ATP level was significantly decreased, the cell viability was greatly inhibited, and the compensatory rescue effect of glutamine was eliminated. When combined with chemotherapy, cotreatment with CAI and the glycolysis inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) inhibited the pancreatic cancer progression after chemotherapy. As the inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative metabolism can explain several anticancer activities of CAI reported previously, including inhibition of calcium entry and induction of reactive oxygen species, we demonstrate that inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation may be the fundamental mechanism of CAI. The combination of CAI and 2-DG causes energy depletion in cancer cells, eliminating the rescue effect of the metabolic environment. Inhibiting pancreatic cancer progression after chemotherapy is a rational application of this metabolism-disturbing combination strategy.

Effects of Gemcitabine in Normaland Transformed Human Lung Cell Cultures: Cytotoxicity and Increase in Radiation Sensitivity

Aims and Background

Several anticancer drugs increase cell sensitivity to irradiation. Gemcitabine (2′, 2′ difluorodeoxycytidine) decreases the cellular dNTP pools and thus significantly increases the sensitivity to the DNA damaging effects of low-dose radiation. In this study we have investigated whether gemcitabine may play a role as radiosensitizer also in lung adenocarcinoma treatment.

Methods & Study Design

We studied this nucleoside analogue in normal and transformed human cell lines (fetal lung and lung adenocarcinoma). After drug treatment, cell lines were irradiated with different doses. Cell damage following drug treatment and/or irradiation was assessed by measuring intracellular ATP level and by the colony forming assay.

Results

The two cell lines significantly differed in their sensitivity to the toxic effects of the drug; the normal cell line was much more resistant than its transformed counterpart. This difference was observed in both assays, although it was more evident in the colony forming assay. A low radiation dose (50-100 cGy) did not cause any significant damage to transformed cells; normal cells were more resistant and doses up to 500 cGy caused little damage. However, when transformed cells were pretreated for three hours with gemcitabine, even a nontoxic concentration of the drug (1-10 nM) caused a marked sensitization of the cells to irradiation (50-100 cGy). The radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine could be observed also in normal cells, although these cells were more resistant to the damaging effects of both anticancer treatments.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that gemcitabine, a chemotherapeutic agent already used in the clinic, could be proposed as a radiosensitizer for radiation therapy of lung adenocarcinoma, having a clearly potentiating effect on low-dose radiation.

The histone methyltransferase G9a as a therapeutic target to override gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine (GEM) resistance is a critical issue for pancreatic cancer treatment. The involvement of epigenetic modification in GEM resistance is still unclear. We established a GEM-resistant subline PANC-1-R from the parental PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells and found the elevation of various chromatin-modifying enzymes including G9a in GEM-resistant cells. Ectopic expression of G9a in PANC-1 cells increased GEM resistance while inactivation of G9a in PANC-1-R cells reduced it. Challenge of PANC-1 cells with GEM increased the expression of stemness markers including CD133, nestin and Lgr5 and promoted sphere forming activity suggesting chemotherapy enriched cancer cells with stem-like properties. Inhibition of G9a in PANC-1-R cells reduced stemness and invasiveness and sensitized the cells to GEM. We revealed interleukin-8 (IL-8) is a downstream effector of G9a to increase GEM resistance. G9a-overexpressing PANC-1-R cells exhibited autocrine IL-8/CXCR1/2 stimulation to increase GEM resistance which could be decreased by anti-IL-8 antibody and G9a inhibitor. IL-8 released by cancer cells also activated pancreatic stellate cell (PSC) to increase GEM resistance. In orthotopic animal model, GEM could not suppress tumor growth of PANC-1-R cells and eventually promoted tumor metastasis. Combination with G9a inhibitor and GEM reduced tumor growth, metastasis, IL-8 expression and PSC activation in animals. Finally, we showed that overexpression of G9a correlated with poor survival and early recurrence in pancreatic cancer patients. Collectively, our results suggest G9a is a therapeutic target to override GEM resistance in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine and glioblastoma: challenges and current perspectives

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog currently used for the treatment of various solid tumors as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Its use against highly aggressive brain tumors (glioblastoma) has been evaluated in preclinical and clinical trials leading to controversial results. Gemcitabine can inhibit DNA chain elongation, is a potent radiosensitizer and it can enhance antitumor immune activity, but it also presents some drawbacks (e.g., short half-life, side effects, chemoresistance). The aim of this review is to discuss the challenges related to the use of gemcitabine for glioblastoma and to report recent studies that suggest overcoming these obstacles opening new perspectives for its use in the field (e.g., gemcitabine derivatives and/or nanomedicines).

Gemcitabine Conjugated Chitosan and Double Antibodies (Abc-GC-Gemcitabine Nanoparticles) Enhanced Cytoplasmic Uptake of Gemcitabine and Inhibit Proliferation and Metastasis In Human SW1990 Pancreatic Cancer Cells

BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is considered a chemoresistant neoplasm with extremely dismal prognosis and gemcitabine treatment is associated with many side effects and poor overall survival. The study aimed at developing a new nanobioconjugate, which specifically delivered gemcitabine and anti-EGFR antibody into pancreatic cancer cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS The novel nanodrug is based on chitosan platform, which is non-toxic, biocompatibility and biodegradable. We measured the effects of proliferation and metastasis on SW1990 by CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, wound healing assay and Transwell assay. The expression of related proteins were evaluated by Western blot. RESULTS We synthesized Abc-GC-gemcitabine nanoparticles successfully with the encapsulation rate of nanobioconjugates was 91.63% and the drug loadings was 9.97%. Both GC-gemcitabine microspheres solution (GC group) and Abc-GC-gemcitabine microspheres solution (Abc group) inhibited cells proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion in SW1990 cells dramatically. Moreover, Abc-GC-gemcitabine microspheres expressed more significant inhibited action than GC-gemcitabine microspheres efficiently CONCLUSIONS Our data suggested that Abc-GC-gemcitabine nanoparticles could have promising potential in treating metastasized and chemoresistant pancreatic cancer by enhancing the drug efficacy and minimizing off target effects.

The Role of Oxygen in Avascular Tumor Growth

The oxygen status of a tumor has significant clinical implications for treatment prognosis, with well-oxygenated subvolumes responding markedly better to radiotherapy than poorly supplied regions. Oxygen is essential for tumor growth, yet estimation of local oxygen distribution can be difficult to ascertain in situ, due to chaotic patterns of vasculature. It is possible to avoid this confounding influence by using avascular tumor models, such as tumor spheroids, a much better approximation of realistic tumor dynamics than monolayers, where oxygen supply can be described by diffusion alone. Similar to in situ tumours, spheroids exhibit an approximately sigmoidal growth curve, often approximated and fitted by logistic and Gompertzian sigmoid functions. These describe the basic rate of growth well, but do not offer an explicitly mechanistic explanation. This work examines the oxygen dynamics of spheroids and demonstrates that this growth can be derived mechanistically with cellular doubling time and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) being key parameters. The model is fitted to growth curves for a range of cell lines and derived values of OCR are validated using clinical measurement. Finally, we illustrate how changes in OCR due to gemcitabine treatment can be directly inferred using this model.

Deoxycytidine kinase augments ATM-Mediated DNA repair and contributes to radiation resistance

Efficient and adequate generation of deoxyribonucleotides is critical to successful DNA repair. We show that ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) integrates the DNA damage response with DNA metabolism by regulating the salvage of deoxyribonucleosides. Specifically, ATM phosphorylates and activates deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) at serine 74 in response to ionizing radiation (IR). Activation of dCK shifts its substrate specificity toward deoxycytidine, increases intracellular dCTP pools post IR, and enhances the rate of DNA repair. Mutation of a single serine 74 residue has profound effects on murine T and B lymphocyte development, suggesting that post-translational regulation of dCK may be important in maintaining genomic stability during hematopoiesis. Using [(18)F]-FAC, a dCK-specific positron emission tomography (PET) probe, we visualized and quantified dCK activation in tumor xenografts after IR, indicating that dCK activation could serve as a biomarker for ATM function and DNA damage response in vivo. In addition, dCK-deficient leukemia cell lines and murine embryonic fibroblasts exhibited increased sensitivity to IR, indicating that pharmacologic inhibition of dCK may be an effective radiosensitization strategy.

Polymeric theranostics: using polymer-based systems for simultaneous imaging and therapy

Polymer-based nanomedicine is a large and fast growing field. Polymer-based systems have been extensively used as therapeutic carriers as well as bioimaging agents for example in tumour diagnosis. However, fewer polymeric systems have been able to combine both therapy and imaging in a new field that is called theranostics (theragnostics). This review aims to summarise the recent developments and trends on polymeric theranostics. Four different types of therapies/treatments are examined namely drug delivery, gene delivery, photodynamic therapy and hyperthermia treatment combined with different imaging moieties like magnetic resonance imaging agents, fluorescent agents and microbubbles for ultrasound imaging.

Effects of a non thermal plasma treatment alone or in combination with gemcitabine in a MIA PaCa2-luc orthotopic pancreatic carcinoma model

Pancreatic tumors are the gastrointestinal cancer with the worst prognosis in humans and with a survival rate of 5% at 5 years. Nowadays, no chemotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in terms of survival for this cancer. Previous study focused on the development of a new therapy by non thermal plasma showed significant effects on tumor growth for colorectal carcinoma and glioblastoma. To allow targeted treatment, a fibered plasma (Plasma Gun) was developed and its evaluation was performed on an orthotopic mouse model of human pancreatic carcinoma using a MIA PaCa2-luc bioluminescent cell line. The aim of this study was to characterize this pancreatic carcinoma model and to determine the effects of Plasma Gun alone or in combination with gemcitabine. During a 36 days period, quantitative BLI could be used to follow the tumor progression and we demonstrated that plasma gun induced an inhibition of MIA PaCa2-luc cells proliferation in vitro and in vivo and that this effect could be improved by association with gemcitabine possibly thanks to its radiosensitizing properties.

Isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine combined with radiotherapy: no additional lung toxicity in an experimental model

OBJECTIVES

Isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine is an effective technique for the treatment of lung metastases in an experimental model. In clinical studies, increased toxicity has been observed when combining intravenous gemcitabine with radiotherapy (RT). The goal of our study was to determine whether RT in combination with isolated lung perfusion increases lung toxicity.

METHODS

Rodents were randomized into eight groups: sham group, RT, intravenous gemcitabine, intravenous gemcitabine combined with RT, isolated lung perfusion with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) or gemcitabine, isolated lung perfusion with HES or gemcitabine combined with RT. Gemcitabine was administered in a dose of 40 mg/kg and RT as a single fraction of 8 Gy. The effect on lung tissue was evaluated by % fibrosis in a haematoxylin-eosin stain and by % alveoli that contained siderophages on Perls stain. A total of 36 slices were made per treatment and per stain. The results of different groups were compared using logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between treatment with intravenous gemcitabine and RT. Isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine showed significant more histopathologic changes compared with intravenous gemcitabine (P < 0.0001). When RT was added, there was no fibrosis after intravenous gemcitabine and mild-to-moderate haemosiderosis. After isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine combined with RT, there was moderate to severe fibrosis and mild to severe haemosiderosis. Adding RT to isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine showed no significant difference compared to isolated lung perfusion alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of isolated lung perfusion and RT is feasible in an experimental model. No additional toxicity of RT was observed compared to isolated lung perfusion alone. Further studies are necessary to determine efficacy of this combined treatment.

Local control of experimental malignant pancreatic tumors by treatment with a combination of chemotherapy and intratumoral 224radium-loaded wires releasing alpha-emitting atoms

We developed (224)Ra-loaded wires that when inserted into solid tumors, release radioactive atoms that spread in the tumor and irradiate it effectively with alpha particles (diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy [DaRT]). In this study, we tested the ability of intratumoral (224)Ra-loaded wires to control the local growth of pancreatic tumors and the enhancement of this effect by chemotherapy. Pancreatic mouse tumors (Panc02) were treated with (224)Ra-loaded wire(s) with or without gemcitabine. The tumor size and survival were monitored, and autoradiography was performed to evaluate the spread of radioactive atoms inside the tumor. Mouse and human pancreatic cancer cells, irradiated in vitro by alpha particles with or without chemotherapy, were evaluated for cell growth inhibition. The insertion of (224)Ra-loaded wires into pancreatic tumors in combination with gemcitabine achieved significant local control and was superior to each treatment alone. A dosimetric analysis showed the spread of radioactive atoms in the tumor around the wires. Alpha particles combined with gemcitabine or 5-FU killed mouse and human cells in vitro better than each treatment alone. DaRT in combination with gemcitabine was proven effective against pancreatic tumors in vivo and in vitro, and the process may be applicable as a palliative treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Concurrent radiotherapy and gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using gemcitabine (GEM) for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 108 patients treated with concurrent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and GEM were reviewed. The median dose of EBRT in all 108 patients was 50.4 Gy (range, 3.6-60.8 Gy), usually administered in conventional fractionations (1.8-2 Gy/day). During radiotherapy, most patients received GEM at a dosage of 250 to 350 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly for approximately 6 weeks. After CCRT, 59 patients (54.6%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), mainly with GEM. The median follow-up for all 108 patients was 11.0 months (range, 0.4-37.9 months).

RESULTS

Initial responses after CCRT for 85 patients were partial response: 26 patients, no change: 51 patients and progressive disease: 8 patients. Local progression was observed in 35 patients (32.4%), and the 2-year local control (LC) rate in all patients was 41.9%. Patients treated with total doses of 50 Gy or more had significantly more favorable LC rates (2-year LC rate, 42.9%) than patients treated with total doses of less than 50 Gy (2-year LC rate, 29.6%). Regional lymph node recurrence was found in only 1 patient, and none of the 57 patients with clinical N0 disease had regional lymph node recurrence. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and the median survival time in all patients were 23.5% and 11.6 months, respectively. Patients treated with AC had significantly more favorable OS rates (2-year OS, 31.8%) than those treated without AC (2-year OS, 12.4%; p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, AC use and clinical T stage were significant prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

CCRT using GEM yields a relatively favorable LC rate for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and CCRT with AC conferred a survival benefit compared to CCRT without AC.

Chemoradiation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a literature review

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas has an annual incidence of 7,400 cases in the U.K. In comparison with other common cancers of solid organs, namely, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer has a high morbidity and mortality. Radical resection is possible in only 15%-20% of patients, and only 3%-4% of all patients presenting with this condition achieve long-term control and cure. Various strategies in the form of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment have been employed over the years to improve outcome, with limited success. Systemic chemotherapy remains the gold standard in the metastatic setting in good performance status patients, and adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of localized and locally advanced cancer has been found to improve outcome. The role of radiotherapy, however, remains controversial and is an area that merits further investigation in well-conducted multicenter trials at various stages of the disease in combination with systemic agents and exploiting recent advances in the delivery of radiotherapy. In this article, we review the published literature on the use of chemoradiation as a modality in various stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and highlight areas that future trials in this field should target for a way forward in this malignancy.

Combined gemcitabine and carboplatin therapy for carcinomas in dogs

BACKGROUND

Response and adverse reactions to combined gemcitabine (GEM) and carboplatin (CARBO) therapy in dogs with carcinomas are not documented.

HYPOTHESIS

GEM and CARBO are safe for the treatment of dogs with carcinomas.

ANIMALS

Thirty-seven dogs with histologically or cytologically confirmed carcinomas.

METHODS

Prospective clinical trial. Dogs were treated with GEM (2 mg/kg, 20-30-minute infusion IV) on Days 1 and 8 and 4 hours later, CARBO (10 mg/kg IV) on Day 1. The cycle was repeated on Day 22.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven dogs (29 with measurable tumor) received a median of 2 cycles (range 0.5-6) for a total of 101 cycles administered. Twelve dogs (32%) developed neutropenia (3 Grade 3, and 5 Grade 4) and 9 (24%) thrombocytopenia (2 Grade 3, and 1 Grade 4). Dogs >20 kg were twice as likely to develop thrombocytopenia (P= .023). Twenty-seven dogs (73%) had evidence of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicosis, but most signs were of mild to moderate severity and self-limiting. One dog died of treatment-related complications. Overall tumor response rate was 13%. One dog with metastatic prostatic carcinoma achieved a complete remission and 1 dog with intestinal adenocarcinoma and 1 with tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma achieved partial remission. Twelve dogs achieved stable disease for a median of 72 days.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

GEM and CARBO combination causes mild to moderate hematologic and GI toxicosis in dogs with carcinoma. Response rate in this study was modest, and optimization of dosing of this combination is required.

A phase II trial of low-dose gemcitabine and radiation alternated to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil: an active and manageable regimen for stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The addition of gemcitabine may be a reasonable way to enhance the activity of the alternating cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and radiation regimen considered the referring approach for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck at the National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa.

METHODS

Three courses of cisplatin, 20mg/m(2)/day and 5-fluorouracil, 200mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5 (weeks 1, 4, and 7) alternated to 3 courses of radiotherapy at standard fractionation (weeks 2-3, 5-6, 8-9) up to 60Gy, and gemcitabine, 50mg/m(2) on monday of each week of radiation, were administered to 47 patients with stage IV (42 patients) or relapsed after surgery (5 patients), SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the patients completed the planned treatment. Main grade 3-4 acute toxicities were: mucositis (40%), neutropenia (26%) and thrombocytopenia (30%). Twenty-seven patients reached a complete response (57%). Seven partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate: 72%). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 50%, 43% and 54%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of gemcitabine at low dose to our referring alternating regimen is feasible and very active. It may improve the long-term outcomes despite an acceptable increase of acute mucoseal toxicity.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine plus regional hyperthermia for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: initial experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with gemcitabine plus regional hyperthermia (HT) for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with LAPC treated with concurrent CRT using gemcitabine were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was administered with a median total dose of 61.2 Gy. Of the 29 patients, 20 (69%) also underwent regional HT during CRT (CRHT group). The remaining 9 patients did not receive regional HT (CRT group) because of a common bile duct stent placement, patient refusal, older age, or obesity. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatments and the predictors of good outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median disease progression-free and overall survival times were significantly better for the CRHT group than for the CRT group (8.8 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.02, and 18.6 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.01), respectively. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities for the CRHT group were detected in eight patients (40%) and grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity in one (diarrhea).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent CRT using gemcitabine with regional HT may be a feasible and promising regimen for LAPC, and the results justified further evaluation in a large number of patients to confirm its definite benefit.

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: on the edge of survival

BACKGROUND

Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer are at high risk of having positive surgical margins due to involvement of the tumor with adjacent vasculature. This article reviews the management of this subset of pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

The authors review the current definitions of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and how it is diagnosed and staged. The history, current approaches, and future directions in neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer are also reviewed with emphasis on various chemotherapy regimens that have been used. The application of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy that accounts for respiratory motion to targeting the gross tumor volume in the pancreas are discussed, and the promise of integrating targeted therapies in neoadjuvant treatment programs is highlighted.

RESULTS

The use of neoadjuvant treatment programs that employ gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens followed by chemoradiation increases the likelihood of subsequent margin-negative resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been progress in the imaging, staging, surgical technique, and the use of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in the management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Patients can benefit from multidisciplinary management at high-volume pancreatic cancer treatment centers.

Enhancement of somatostatin-receptor-targeted (177)Lu-[DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)]-octreotide therapy by gemcitabine pretreatment-mediated receptor uptake, up-regulation and cell cycle modulation

INTRODUCTION

Clinical studies of patients treated with somatostatin-receptor (sstr)-targeted [DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)]-octreotide (DOTATOC) labeled with (177)Lu and (90)Y have shown overall response rates in the range of 9-33%. This study evaluates the potential for combination therapy with gemcitabine in an effort to improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Human pancreatic adenocarcinoma Capan-2, rat pancreatic cancer AR42J and human small cell lung cancer NCI-H69 cells were each treated with 1 microg/ml gemcitabine for 4 days followed by replacement of the medium alone for four additional days. Cell cycle and direct receptor-uptake studies were performed with (177)Lu-DOTATOC after the total 8-day treatment as described. Cell viability and apoptosis experiments were performed to study the effects of gemcitabine pretreatment and (177)Lu-DOTATOC radionuclide therapy. Parallel control studies were performed with receptor-non-targeted (177)Lu-DOTA and DOTATOC.

RESULTS

Cells treated with gemcitabine for 4 days showed a down-regulation of sstr expression as determined by (177)Lu-DOTATOC uptake. However, after 4 days of additional growth in absence of gemcitabine, the uptake of (177)Lu-DOTATOC was 1.5-3 times greater than that of the untreated control cells. In gemcitabine-pretreated Capan-2 cells, 84% of the cell population was in the G(2)M phase of the cell cycle. Due to sstr up-regulation and cell cycle modulations, synergistic effects of gemcitabine pretreatment were observed in cell viability and apoptosis assays. (177)Lu-DOTATOC resulted in two to three times greater apoptosis in gemcitabine-pretreated Capan-2 cells compared to the untreated cells.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine pretreatment up-regulates sstr expression and acts as a radiosensitizer through cell cycle modulation. The rational combination of gemcitabine and sstr-targeted radiopharmaceuticals represents a promising chemoradiation therapeutic tool with great potential to improve clinical outcomes and, thus, merits further study.

Outpatient Chemotherapy plus Radiotherapy in Sarcomas: Improving Cancer Control with Radiosensitizing Agents

Background

Cancer control by radiotherapy (RT) can be improved with concurrent chemotherapy. Outpatient strategies for sarcomas that combine chemotherapy and RT are possible since supportive care and RT techniques have improved.

Methods

The current status of non-anthracycline chemotherapy in combination with radiation for high-risk sarcoma is reviewed.

Results

Ifosfamide with mesna and newer activated ifosfamide agents (ZIO-201 and glufosfamide) have high potential to improve sarcoma cancer control. In Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma, high-dose ifosfamide with mesna (2.8 g/m2/day of each x 5 days; mesna day 6) can be safely given to outpatients using continuous infusion. Reducing ifosfamide nephrotoxicity and central nervous system side effects are discussed. Other outpatient radiosensitization regimens include gemcitabine (600–1000 mg/m2/dose IV over 1 hour weekly x 2–3 doses), temozolomide (75 mg/m2/daily x 3–6 weeks), or temozolomide (100 mg/m2/dose daily x 5) + irinotecan (10 mg/m2/dose daily x 5 x 2 weeks). In osteosarcoma with osteoblastic metastases on bone scan, samarium (1 mCi/kg; day 3 of RT) and gemcitabine (600 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour day 9 of RT) is a radiosensitization strategy. Future drugs for radiosensitization include beta-D-glucose targeted activated ifosfamide (glufosfamide) and sapacitabine, an oral nucleoside with in vitro activity against solid tumors including sarcomas.

Conclusions

The potential to treat major causes of sarcoma treatment failure (local recurrence and distant metastases) with concurrent chemotherapy during radiation should be considered in high-grade sarcomas.

Radiotherapy Does Not Influence the Severe Pulmonary Toxicity Observed With the Administration of Gemcitabine and Bleomycin in Patients With Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma Treated With the BAGCOPP Regimen: A Report by the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on the severe pulmonary toxicity observed in the pilot study of BAGCOPP (bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, and gemcitabine) for advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with Stage III or IV Hodgkin's lymphoma or Stage IIB with risk factors participated in this single-arm, multicenter pilot study.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled on the study before its premature closure as a result of the development of serious pulmonary toxicity in 8 patients. The pulmonary toxicity occurred either during or immediately after the BAGCOPP chemotherapy course. Pulmonary toxicity contributed to one early fatality but resolved in the other 7 patients after cessation of gemcitabine and bleomycin, allowing continuation of therapy. Fifteen patients received consolidative radiotherapy, including 4 who previously had pulmonary toxicity. There were no reported cases of radiation pneumonitis and no exacerbation of pulmonary symptoms in the 4 patients who had had previous pulmonary toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The severe pulmonary toxicity observed in this study has been attributed to an interaction between gemcitabine and bleomycin. Gemcitabine (when administered without bleomycin) remains of interest in Hodgkin's lymphoma and is being incorporated into a new German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group protocol that also includes consolidative radiotherapy. This study supports the concept of the integration of radiotherapy in gemcitabine-containing regimens in Hodgkin's lymphoma if there is an interval of at least 4 weeks between the two modalities and with a schedule whereby radiotherapy follows the chemotherapy.

Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor class in the treatment of head and neck cancer with concurrent radiochemotherapy in vivo

PURPOSE

To optimally integrate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors into the clinical treatment of head and neck cancer, two important questions must be answered: (a) does EGFR inhibition add to the effects of radiochemotherapy, and (b) if so, which method of inhibiting EGFR is superior (an EGFR antibody versus a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor)? We designed an in vivo study to address these questions.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Nude mice with UMSCC-1 head and neck cancer xenografts received either single, double, or triple agent therapy with an EGFR inhibitor (either cetuximab or gefitinib), gemcitabine, and/or radiation for 3 weeks. Tumor volumes and animal weights were measured for up to 15 weeks. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining were done on tumors treated with either cetuximab or gefitinib alone.

RESULTS

The addition of an EGFR inhibitor significantly delayed the tumor volume doubling time, from a median of 40 days with radiochemotherapy (gemcitabine and radiation) alone, to 106 days with cetuximab and 66 days with gefitinib (both P < 0.005). Cetuximab resulted in significantly less weight loss than gefitinib. Immunoblot analysis and immunofluorescent staining of tumors show that although levels of phosphorylated AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase were decreased similarly in response to cetuximab or gefitinib, cetuximab caused prolonged suppression of pEGFR, pSTAT3, and Bcl(XL) compared with gefitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR inhibition, particularly with cetuximab, improves the effectiveness of radiochemotherapy in this model of head and neck cancer. The correlation of response with prolonged suppression of EGFR, STAT3, and Bcl(XL) offers the possibility that these may be candidate biomarkers for response.

A phase I study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and radiation in locally advanced, non-operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib when administered concurrently with twice weekly gemcitabine and radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, assess the safety and toxicity profile of this combination and secondarily evaluate response, time to tumor progression and overall survival.

METHODS

Patients with untreated locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with daily erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine 40 mg/m(2)/30 min twice weekly and RT delivered at 180 cGy/day in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks for a total of 5040 cGy. Erlotinib was dose escalated in successive cohorts (100 mg, 125 mg). When the MTD was determined, the cohort was expanded to better define toxicity and preliminarily efficacy. All patients were surgically staged. After chemoradiation, patients received maintenance weekly gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle and daily erlotinib for four cycles.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated at dose level 1 (erlotinib 100 mg) without limiting toxicity. Two of six patients at dose level 2 (erlotinib 125 mg) had dose-limiting toxicities, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, causing dose delay and elevated liver enzymes. The MTD for erlotinib in combination with twice weekly gemcitabine-based chemoradiation was 100 mg/day. Eleven additional patients were treated at dose level 1. All twenty patients were assessable for toxicity. Seventeen patients were assessable for response. The partial response rate was 35% and 53% had stable disease. The median survival for all patients was 18.7 months.

CONCLUSION

In combination with fixed dose gemcitabine at 40 mg/m(2) twice weekly and radiation at 180 cGy/day, the MTD of erlotinib was found to be 100 mg/day. This is a relatively well tolerated, biologically active combination in a poor prognostic cancer.

Mismatched nucleotides as the lesions responsible for radiosensitization with gemcitabine: a new paradigm for antimetabolite radiosensitizers

Radiation sensitization by 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (dFdCyd) has correlated with dATP depletion [dFdCDP-mediated inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase (RR)] and S-phase accumulation. We hypothesized that radiosensitization by dFdCyd is due to nucleotide misincorporations in the presence of deoxynucleotide triphosphate pool imbalances, which, if not repaired, augments cell death following irradiation. The ability of dFdCyd to produce misincorporations was measured as pSP189 plasmid mutations in hMLH1-deficient [mismatch repair (MMR) deficient] and hMLH1-expressing (MMR proficient) HCT116 cells. Only MMR-deficient cells showed a significant increase in nucleotide misincorporations (2- to 3-fold increase; P <or= 0.01) after radiosensitizing concentrations of dFdCyd +/- 5 Gy radiation, which persisted for at least 96 h. dFdCyd (10 nmol/L) did not radiosensitize MMR-proficient HCT116 or A549 cells, but following small interfering RNA-mediated suppression of hMLH1, this concentration produced excellent radiosensitization (radiation enhancement ratios = 1.6 +/- 0.1 and 1.5 +/- 0.1, respectively; P < 0.05) and a 2.5-fold increase in mutation frequency in A549 cells. Cytosine arabinoside (1-beta-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine), which can be incorporated into DNA but does not inhibit RR, failed to radiosensitize MMR-deficient cells or increase mutation frequency in the MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient cells. However, the RR inhibitor hydroxyurea radiosensitized MMR-deficient cells and increased nucleotide misincorporations (>or=5-fold increase; P < 0.05), thus further implicating the inhibition of RR as the mechanism underlying radiosensitization by dFdCyd. These data showed that the presence and persistence of mismatched nucleotides is integral to radiosensitization by dFdCyd and suggest a role for hMLH1 deficiency in eliciting the radiosensitizing effect.

The concurrent chemoradiation paradigm—general principles

During the past 20 years, the advent of neoadjuvant, primary, and adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy has improved cancer care dramatically. Significant contributions have been made by technological improvements in radiotherapy, as well as by the introduction of novel chemotherapy agents and dosing schedules. This article will review the rationale for the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treating malignancies. The molecular basis and mechanisms of action of combining classic cytotoxic agents (e.g. platinum-containing drugs, taxanes, etc.) and novel agents (e.g. tirapazamine, EGFR inhibitors and other targeted agents) with radiotherapy will be examined. This article is part one of two articles. In the subsequent article, the general principles outlined here will be applied to head and neck cancer, in which the impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy is particularly evident.

Role of epidermal growth factor receptor degradation in gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity

We have recently reported that treatment with gemcitabine, a potent chemotherapeutic agent and radiation sensitizer, stimulates phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Because phosphorylation of EGFR is known to precede receptor degradation, we hypothesized that gemcitabine treatment may also result in EGFR degradation. In two human head and neck cancer cell lines, UMSCC-1 and UMSCC-6, we demonstrated an approximately 80% decrease in total EGFR levels at 72 h after a 2-h treatment with 1 muM gemcitabine. Neither cisplatin nor 5-fluorouracil, which are used to treat head and neck cancer, caused EGFR degradation. EGFR downregulation did not occur at the level of transcription, as assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), but instead occurred via phosphorylation and ubiquitination of the receptor along a proteosome/lysosome-mediated pathway. Inhibition of EGFR degradation, by either pretreatment with the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib or by exposure to the proteosome/lysosome inhibitor MG132, significantly reduced gemcitabine-induced cell death. These results suggest that EGFR degradation may be a novel mechanism for gemcitabine-mediated cell death. These findings also indicate that caution should be exercised when combining gemcitabine with agents that may prevent EGFR degradation, such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors administered in a suboptimal sequence or proteosome inhibitors.

Synergistic effects of gemcitabine and gefitinib in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma

Although the combination of gemcitabine and radiation produces a high frequency of complete responses in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer, substantial toxicity suggests that an improvement in the therapeutic index is required. The purpose of this study was to determine if gefitinib could improve the efficacy of gemcitabine and if drug schedule is important. We hypothesized that gemcitabine followed by gefitinib would be superior to the opposite order because of both cell cycle and growth factor signaling interactions. Using UMSCC-1 cells in vitro, we confirmed that gefitinib arrested cells in G(1) and suppressed phospho-epidermal growth factor receptor (p(Y845)EGFR) and that gemcitabine arrested cells in S phase and stimulated p(Y845)EGFR. The schedule of gemcitabine followed by gefitinib caused arrest of cells in S phase. Gefitinib suppressed gemcitabine-mediated p(Y845)EGFR stimulation. This schedule caused decreased p(S473)AKT, increased poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, and increased apoptosis compared with gemcitabine alone. The schedule of gefitinib followed by gemcitabine also caused suppression of p(Y845)EGFR but arrested cells in G(1). This schedule in which gefitinib was used first was associated with stable levels of p(S473)AKT and minimal poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage and apoptosis. These results were reflected in experiments in nude mice bearing UMSCC-1 xenografts, in which there was greater tumor regression and apoptosis when animals received gemcitabine followed by gefitinib during the first week of therapy. These findings suggest that the schedule of gemcitabine followed by gefitinib may increase the therapeutic index over gemcitabine alone and, combined with clinical data, encourage exploration of combination of gemcitabine, EGFR inhibitors, and radiation.

Unraveling the mechanism of radiosensitization by gemcitabine: the role of TP53

Gemcitabine has excellent radiosensitizing properties, as shown in both preclinical and clinical studies. Radiosensitization correlated with the early S-phase block of gemcitabine. In the present study, we investigated the role of TP53 in the radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine. Isogenic A549 cells differing in TP53 status were treated with gemcitabine during the 24 h prior to irradiation. Cell survival was determined 7 days after irradiation by the sulforhodamine B test. In addition, cell cycle perturbation was determined by flow cytometry and TP53 expression by Western blot analysis. Gemcitabine caused a concentration-dependent radiosensitizing effect in all cell lines. Transformed A549 cells were less sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine. The cell cycle arrest early in the S phase was dependent on the drug dose but was comparable in the different cell lines and was not related to functional TP53. Using isogenic cell lines, we have shown that neither TP53 status nor the transfection procedure influenced the radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine. Since both the radiosensitizing effect at equitoxic concentrations and the cell cycle effect of gemcitabine were independent of TP53 expression, it is likely that TP53 protein does not play a crucial role in the radiosensitizing mechanism of gemcitabine.

The radiosensitising effect of difluorodeoxyuridine, a metabolite of gemcitabine, in vitro

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine is an active antitumour agent with radiosensitising properties. Gemcitabine is rapidly metabolised, intracellularly as well as extracellularly, by deoxycytidine deaminase to difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), a compound with little antitumour activity. However, plasma concentrations are maintained for a prolonged period (>24 h) at levels known to cause growth inhibition. This is the first study that investigates the radiosensitising potential of dFdU in vitro.

METHODS

ECV304 and H292, human cancer cells, were treated with different concentrations dFdU (0-100 microM) during 24 h before radiation treatment (RT). The schedule dependency of the radiosensitising effect was studied by varying the interval between dFdU and radiation treatment. In addition, the cell cycle effect of dFdU was investigated with flow cytometry, and the induction of apoptosis under radiosensitising conditions was determined by Annexin V staining and caspase 3 cleavage.

RESULTS

dFdU caused a clear concentration-dependent radiosensitising effect in both ECV304 and H292 cells. Dose enhancement factor (DEF) increased with an increasing concentration of dFdU: DEFs were 1.10, 1.60 and 2.17 after treatment with 10, 25 and 50 microM dFdU, respectively, in ECV304 cells and 1.08, 1.31 and 1.60 after treatment with 25, 50 and 100 microM, respectively, in H292 cells. DEFs decreased with an increasing interval of 0-24 h between dFdU treatment and radiation. Under radiosensitising conditions, the combination dFdU and radiation resulted in an increased induction of apoptosis. In addition, the cell cycle effect of dFdU, an arrest at the early S phase, is comparable with the cell cycle effect of gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

dFdU, the main metabolite of gemcitabine, causes a concentration- and schedule- dependent radiosensitising effect in vitro. Since the metabolite is present in plasma for a long period (>24 h) after treatment with gemcitabine, it might be partly responsible for the interaction between radiotherapy and gemcitabine. This observation might have important consequences for the optimal schedules of the combination gemcitabine and radiation therapy.

Combined Modality Therapy of Gemcitabine and Radiation

The combination of gemcitabine and radiotherapy is a promising combined modality therapy. However, the clinical application of this combination has to be implemented carefully because of an increased toxicity to normal tissues. A body of experimental evidence shows that gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer in vitro and in vivo. The observations so far indicate that various mechanisms are responsible for the radiosensitizing effect. Although it is often difficult to transfer experimental data to the clinic, these studies offer the possibility to develop an improved schedule of administration for patient treatment, based on rational evidence in tumor biology. In the current review, the preclinical data that support the use of gemcitabine as a radiosensitizing agent and the clinical trials that have been conducted to date are summarized.

Increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines as a cause of lung toxicity after combined treatment with gemcitabine and thoracic irradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preclinical evidence suggesting gemcitabine potentiates the anti-tumor effects of irradiation has resulted in clinical trials to evaluate the treatment efficacy of gemcitabine and concurrent thoracic irradiation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although these studies demonstrated favorable tumor response, this combined treatment modality was accompanied by severe treatment-related toxicities predominantly of the lung. In an attempt to elucidate the determinants of lung toxicity for gemcitabine, we analyzed the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1alpha and IL-6 in the lung tissue of mice treated with gemcitabine and concurrent thoracic irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four study groups were defined: C57BL/6J mice that received neither irradiation nor gemcitabine (NT-group), those that received gemcitabine (120 mg/kg intraperitoneal, i.p.) but no irradiation (GEM-group), those that underwent thoracic irradiation (12 Gy) without gemcitabine (XRT-group), and those that received both gemcitabine (120 mg/kg i.p., 2 h before irradiation) and thoracic irradiation (GEM/XRT-group). The mice were sacrificed at 1 h, 1 and 3 days, 1, 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment (p.t.). The mRNA expression of TNF-alpha, IL-1alpha and IL-6 in the lung tissue was quantified by competitive RT-PCR. The cellular origin of the cytokine expression was identified by immunohistochemistry. The cytokine expression was correlated with histopathological alterations.

RESULTS

The TNF-alpha, IL-1alpha and IL-6 expression in the lung tissue of the GEM/XRT mice was clearly higher at all assessment time points compared to the NT mice (statistically significant at 1 h, 1 and 3 days, 1, 2 and 4 weeks p.t.), XRT mice (statistically significant at 1 week p.t.) or GEM mice (statistically significant at 1 h, 1 and 2 weeks p.t.). Maximal treatment-induced cytokine expression in the lung tissue of the GEM/XRT mice occurred already at 1 week p.t. (TNF-alpha: 30.9 +/- 5.3/IL-1alpha: 28.3 +/- 5.0/IL-6: 4.9 +/- 0.1 times basal level), and coincides with pathohistologically discernable interstitial pneumonitis. The elevated levels of TNF-alpha and IL-1alpha have been found to correlate with immunohistochemical staining of the bronchiolar epithelium and predominantly of inflammatory cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide evidence that the increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the induction of a cytokine-triggered inflammatory response may be a determinant of the observed elevated lung toxicity after concurrent treatment with gemcitabine and thoracic irradiation.

Phase II study of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine has been reported to be a potent radiosensitiser in human pancreatic cell lines. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In all, 42 patients with pancreatic cancer that was unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region were treated with external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) and weekly gemcitabine (250 mg m⁻², 30-min infusion). Maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg m⁻² weekly × 3 every 4 weeks) was initiated 1 month after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Of the 42 patients, 38 (90%) completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy. The major toxicity was leucopenia and anorexia. There was one death attributed to duodenal bleeding and sepsis. The median survival time was 9.5 months and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months. In 35 patients with documented disease progression at the time of analysis, 34 (97%) showed distant metastasis as the cause of the initial disease progression. The chemoradiotherapy used in this study has a moderate activity against locally advanced pancreatic cancer and an acceptable toxicity profile. Future investigations for treatment with more systemic effects are warranted.

Combined-modality therapy with gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy: results of a phase I trial

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine given twice weekly with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients underwent maximal transurethral resection of their bladder tumors followed by twice-weekly infusion of gemcitabine with 2 Gy/d concurrent radiotherapy to the bladder, for a total of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m(2) with subsequent dose levels of 20, 27, 30, and 33 mg/m(2). The primary end point was the determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of toxicity associated with combined-modality therapy and initial assessment of the rate of bladder preservation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled and 23 were assessable for toxicity and response. No significant toxicity was demonstrated at the 10 or 20 mg/m(2) twice-weekly doses. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in two of three patients treated at 33 mg/m(2). Intermediate dose levels of 27 and 30 mg/m(2) were then evaluated. The MTD of gemcitabine was 27 mg/m(2). The DLT was systemic, manifested as an elevation in liver function tests, malaise, and edema. Fifteen of 23 patients (65%) are alive with bladders intact and no evidence of recurrent disease at a median follow-up of 43 months.

CONCLUSION

Twice-weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy at 2 Gy/d to a total dose of 60 Gy is well-tolerated. The MTD of gemcitabine is 27 mg/m(2). There is a high rate of bladder preservation in this selected group of patients.

Alternating gemcitabine and cisplatin with gemcitabine and radiation in stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

In order to improve our cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based alternating chemo-radiotherapy regimen, in 1996 we started an investigational program to explore a modified alternating regimen including gemcitabine given both with radiosensitizing and cytotoxic intent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on our previous feasibility trial, we conducted a second study testing the feasibility and activity of the following schedule: gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 (weeks 1, 4, 7 and 10) alternated with three courses of radiotherapy (RT) (weeks 2-3, 5-6 and 8-9) with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. Gemcitabine 300 mg/m(2) was also administered on the Monday of each week of RT.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with stage IV (41 patients) unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN) or who had relapsed after surgery (6 patients) were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Eight patients (18%) did not complete the treatment. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (44%); neutropenia with fever (12%); thrombocytopenia (37%); anemia (30% grade 3). One patient died in therapy due to sepsis. Most patients needed hospitalization and tube-feeding or parenteral nutrition. However, 44% of patients had a weight loss >10%. Thirty-four patients had a complete response (72%). Three partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate, 79%). At a median follow-up of 38 months actuarial 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 43%, 39% and 64%, respectively. Data of locoregional control favorably compare with those from our database of patients treated with alternating cisplatin-fluorouracil and radiation within controlled clinical trials (64% versus 40%).

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of gemcitabine into an alternating regimen seems to improve the results achievable with the original alternating program in stage IV patients. However, due to the high acute toxicity correlated, this intensive regimen should be managed by institutions well trained in multidisciplinary treatments.

Cell cycle effect of gemcitabine and its role in the radiosensitizing mechanism in vitro

PURPOSE

The mechanism of radiosensitization by gemcitabine is still unclear. It has been hypothesized that the accumulation of cells in early S phase may play a role in enhancing radiosensitivity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The schedule dependency of the radiosensitizing effect was studied in ECV304, human bladder cancer cells, and H292, human lung cancer cells, by varying the incubation time and time interval between gemcitabine and radiation treatment. To determine the role of cell cycle perturbations in the radiosensitization, the influence of gemcitabine on the cell cycle at the moment of radiation was investigated by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The radiosensitizing effect increased with a longer incubation period: Dose enhancement factors varied from 1.30 to 2.82 in ECV304 and from 1.04 to 1.78 in H292 after treatment during 8-32 h, respectively. Radiosensitization decreased with an increasing interval: Dose enhancement factors varied from 2.26 to 1.49 in ECV304 and from 1.45 to 1.11 in H292 after an interval 0-24 h, respectively. Cells were blocked in the early S phase of the cell cycle by gemcitabine. The highest percentage S-phase cells was observed after treatment with the schedules that resulted in the highest radiosensitizing effect.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a clear schedule-dependent radiosensitization by gemcitabine. Our findings demonstrated a correlation between gemcitabine-induced early S-phase block and the radiosensitizing effect.

Gemcitabine as a Radiosensitizer for Nonresectable Feline Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Eight cats with locally advanced, oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were treated with a combination of gemcitabine and palliative radiotherapy. Low-dose gemcitabine was administered twice weekly (25 mg/m2) in conjunction with megavoltage radiation in 6 Gray (Gy) fractions for a total dose of 36 Gy. Responses included two complete and four partial responses, and two cats had no response to therapy. Median duration of remission was 42.5 days (range, 11 to 85 days). Median survival time was 111.5 days (range, 11 to 234 days). This data suggests that a combination of low-dose gemcitabine and palliative radiation therapy may be tolerable for cats with oral SCC and may cause a therapeutic benefit.

The radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine and the influence of the rescue agent amifostine in vitro

In this study, the radiosensitising effect of different concentrations of gemcitabine and the combination of gemcitabine/radiotherapy with the rescue agent amifostine was investigated in different human tumour cell lines. The cells were treated with gemcitabine (0-8 nM) for 24 h prior to radiation (0-8 Gy). Amifostine (ami) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were added 30 min before radiation. Cell survival was determined 7 or 8 days after radiation treatment by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) test. For ECV304 cells, the dose enhancement factor (DEF) varied from 1.39 to 2.98 after treatment with 1-6 nM gemcitabine. FaDu, H292, A549 and CAL-27 seemed to be less sensitive, with DEFs ranging from 1.02 to 2.67. These cells were also less sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of single-agent gemcitabine. Amifostine with AP clearly showed a protective effect in combination with gemcitabine/radiotherapy. In H292 cells, the protection factor (PF) of amifostine after treatment with gemcitabine and radiotherapy varied from 1.64 to 1.86. In ECV304 cells, the PF varied from 2.20 to 2.29. In conclusion, a clear concentration- and cell line-dependent radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine was observed in all cell lines. Amifostine with AP showed protection against the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine. If the protection in vivo indeed occurs selectively in normal tissues, then amifostine could prevent or strongly minimise the increased toxicity resulting from the radiosensitising effect of the combination of gemcitabine and radiotherapy, without influencing the antitumour effect.

Radiation enhancement by gemcitabine-mediated cell cycle modulations

The purpose of this study was to investigate the exact dose dependency and time dependency of the radiation-enhancing effect of gemcitabine (2',2'difluoro desoxycytidine [dFdC]) in in vitro experiments (HeLa cells: cancer of the uterine cervix, #4197 cells: oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma), and to correlate this effect with the underlying changes in cell cycle distribution. Cell viability was determined fluorometrically after exposure to dFdC (0-20.0 micro mol/l), irradiation (0-37.5 Gy), and both modalities. Combining both therapies, cells were exposed to dFdC (0-10.0 micro mol/l) for 24 hours before further treatment and irradiated (0-30 Gy) immediately afterwards with or without removal of dFdC. For cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry, cells were irradiated (0-40 Gy) or treated with dFdC (0.012-1.0 micro mol/l, 24-48 hours). Additionally, cells were exposed to dFdC (2.0 micro mol/l, 0-4 hours). Cell cycle kinetics were evaluated using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (10 micro mol/l) S-phase labeling, given either 30 minutes before or in the last hour of dFdC treatment (2.0 micro mol/l, 0-6 hours). The fluorometric assay revealed that dFdC enhances radiation-induced cytotoxicity at marginally toxic or nontoxic concentrations (<37 nmol/l). Radiation resulted in the anticipated G2/M arrest already at 2 Gy. DFdC induced concentration and exposure time-dependent cell cycle changes that were better resolved using BrdU, demonstrating a pronounced S-phase arrest already at 12 nmol/l. BrdU-pulse labeling revealed that the cell cycle block occurred at the G1/S boundary. Our data reconfirm the already known radiation enhancement, the S-phase specific activities of dFdC, and the relevance of the synchronized progression of cells through the S-phase with regard to the radiosensitizing properties of low-dose dFdC. However, we could demonstrate that before progressing in the S-phase, cells were blocked and partially synchronized at the more radiosensitive G1/S boundary. Furthermore, cells progressing past the block might accumulate proapoptotic signals caused by both radiation and dFdC, which will also results in cell death.

A phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

This study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine based on the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities of weekly gemcitabine treatment with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Fifteen patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer that was histologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine (150-350 mg x m(-2)) with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Gemcitabine was administered weekly as an intravenous 30-min infusion before radiotherapy for 6 weeks. Three of six patients at the dose of 350 mg x m(-2) of gemicitabine demonstrated dose-limiting toxicities involving neutropenia/ leukocytopenia and elevated transaminase, while nine patients at doses of 150 mg x m(-2) and 250 mg x m(-2) did not demonstrate any sign of dose-limiting toxicity. Of all 15 enrolled patients, six patients (40.0%) showed a partial response. More than 50% reduction of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was observed in 13 (92.9%) of 14 patients who had pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels of 100 U x ml(-1) or greater. The maximum-tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy was 250 mg x m(-2), and this regimen may have substantial antitumour activity for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase II trial of weekly gemcitabine at the dose of 250 mg x m(-2) with concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer is now underway.

Determinants of resistance to 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine)

The inherent or induced resistance of tumors to cytostatic agents is a major clinical problem. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical mechanisms of acquired and inherent resistance to the fluorinated deoxycytidine analog gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC, Gemzar((R))), which has proven activity in non-small cell lung carcinoma, pancreatic and bladder cancer. Extensive research has been performed to elucidate the complex mechanism of action of this relatively new drug. Gemcitabine requires phosphorylation to mono-, di- and triphosphates to be active. Similar to the structurally and functionally related deoxycytidine analog ara-C, the first, crucial step in phosphorylation is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). However, in contrast to ara-C, gemcitabine has multiple intracellular targets; up- or down-regulation of these targets may confer resistance to this drug. Resistance is associated with altered activities of enzymes involved in the metabolism of the drug, of target enzymes, and of enzymes involved in programmed cell death. However, the only strong correlations with gemcitabine sensitivity are dCK activity and dFdCTP pools, with a potential important role for ribonucleotide reductase.

Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Radiation in Advanced, Unresectable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Alternating chemoradiotherapy was shown by our institution to be superior to standard radiation in patients with nonsurgical squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN). Gemcitabine has shown in vitro and in vivo radiosensitizing properties, synergistic activity with cisplatin, and cytotoxic activity against SCC-HN. Thus, the authors tested the feasibility and antitumoral activity of a modified alternating chemoradiotherapy program that includes gemcitabine. Fourteen patients with stage IV (nine patients) or relapsed after surgery (five patients) unresectable SCC-HN were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment plan consisted of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, weeks 1 and 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, day 5, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 5, 6, 7. Radiation was administered during weeks 2, 3, and 4 and 6, 7, and 8 with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. At the end of the combined therapy, patients had to receive two additional courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, for 5 days every 21 days. All the patients are evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. Main grade III-IV toxicities and frequencies were: neutropenia (79%), neutropenia with fever (50%), thrombocytopenia (57%), anemia (35%), mucositis (100%), and cutaneous toxicity (14%). Ten patients (71%) had a weight loss greater than 10%. All but two patients needed hospitalization and tube feeding or parenteral nutrition. The median relative dose intensity of gemcitabine actually delivered was 83%. Two patients died 1 month after the end of treatment before the final evaluation. One patient died of sepsis during the additional cisplatin and fluorouracil courses before response assessment. Ten patients reached a complete response (intention to treat: 71%), and 1 patient had a partial response (9%). At a median follow-up of 34 months, the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival are 41% and 63%, respectively. The estimated 3-year locoregional control is 70%. Considering the expected poor prognosis of the enrolled patients, this combined regimen showed an impressive antitumoral activity, but the severity of acute local and hematologic toxicity correlated makes the exportation of this regimen unproposable. However, the activity observed warrants the exploration of different, less toxic, chemo-radiotherapy programs including gemcitabine.