Ranolazine (RS-43285): a preliminary study of a new anti-anginal agent with selective effect on ischaemic myocardium

Ranolazine Unveiled: Rediscovering an Old Solution in a New Light

Ranolazine is an anti-anginal medication that has demonstrated antiarrhythmic properties by inhibiting both late sodium and potassium currents. Studies have shown promising results for ranolazine in treating both atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias, particularly when used in combination with other medications. This review explores ranolazine's mechanisms of action and its potential role in cardiac arrhythmias treatment in light of previous clinical studies.

Ranolazine: An Old Drug with Emerging Potential; Lessons from Pre-Clinical and Clinical Investigations for Possible Repositioning

Ischemic heart disease is a significant public health problem with high mortality and morbidity. Extensive scientific investigations from basic sciences to clinics revealed multilevel alterations from metabolic imbalance, altered electrophysiology, and defective Ca²⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis leading to lethal arrhythmias. Despite the recent identification of numerous molecular targets with potential therapeutic interest, a pragmatic observation on the current pharmacological R&D output confirms the lack of new therapeutic offers to patients. By contrast, from recent trials, molecules initially developed for other fields of application have shown cardiovascular benefits, as illustrated with some anti-diabetic agents, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes, emphasizing the clear advantage of “old” drug repositioning. Ranolazine is approved as an antianginal agent and has a favorable overall safety profile. This drug, developed initially as a metabolic modulator, was also identified as an inhibitor of the cardiac late Na⁺ current, although it also blocks other ionic currents, including the hERG/Ikr K⁺ current. The latter actions have been involved in this drug’s antiarrhythmic effects, both on supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, despite initial enthusiasm and promising development in the cardiovascular field, ranolazine is only authorized as a second-line treatment in patients with chronic angina pectoris, notwithstanding its antiarrhythmic properties. A plausible reason for this is the apparent difficulty in linking the clinical benefits to the multiple molecular actions of this drug. Here, we review ranolazine’s experimental and clinical knowledge on cardiac metabolism and arrhythmias. We also highlight advances in understanding novel effects on neurons, the vascular system, skeletal muscles, blood sugar control, and cancer, which may open the way to reposition this “old” drug alone or in combination with other medications.

Anti-anginal drugs-beliefs and evidence: systematic review covering 50 years of medical treatment

Chronic stable angina is the most prevalent symptom of ischaemic heart disease and its management is a priority. Current guidelines recommend pharmacological therapy with drugs classified as being first line (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, short acting nitrates) or second line (long-acting nitrates, ivabradine, nicorandil, ranolazine, and trimetazidine). Second line drugs are indicated for patients who have contraindications to first line agents, do not tolerate them or remain symptomatic. Evidence that one drug is superior to another has been questioned. Between January and March 2018, we performed a systematic review of articles written in English over the past 50 years English-written articles in Medline and Embase following preferred reporting items and the Cochrane collaboration approach. We included double blind randomized studies comparing parallel groups on treatment of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease, with a sample size of, at least, 100 patients (50 patients per group), with a minimum follow-up of 1 week and an outcome measured on exercise testing, duration of exercise being the preferred outcome. Thirteen studies fulfilled our criteria. Nine studies involved between 100 and 300 patients, (2818 in total) and a further four enrolled greater than 300 patients. Evidence of equivalence was demonstrated for the use of beta-blockers (atenolol), calcium antagonists (amlodipine, nifedipine), and channel inhibitor (ivabradine) in three of these studies. Taken all together, in none of the studies was there evidence that one drug was superior to another in the treatment of angina or to prolong total exercise duration. There is a paucity of data comparing the efficacy of anti-anginal agents. The little available evidence shows that no anti-anginal drug is superior to another and equivalence has been shown only for three classes of drugs. Guidelines draw conclusions not from evidence but from clinical beliefs.

Ranolazine for stable angina pectoris

BACKGROUND

Stable angina pectoris is a chronic medical condition with significant impact on mortality and quality of life; it can be macrovascular or microvascular in origin. Ranolazine is a second-line anti-anginal drug approved for use in people with stable angina. However, the effects of ranolazine for people with angina are considered to be modest, with uncertain clinical relevance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ranolazine on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, quality of life, acute myocardial infarction incidence, angina episodes frequency and adverse events incidence in stable angina patients, used either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy, and compared to placebo or any other anti-anginal agent.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science in February 2016, as well as regional databases and trials registers. We also screened reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the effects of ranolazine versus placebo or other anti-anginals in people with stable angina pectoris were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Estimates of treatment effects were calculated using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model. Where we found statistically significant heterogeneity (Chi² P < 0.10), we used a random-effects model for pooling estimates. Meta-analysis was not performed where we found considerable heterogeneity (I² ≥ 75%). We used GRADE criteria to assess evidence quality and the GRADE profiler (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create 'Summary of findings' tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 RCTs (9975 participants, mean age 63.3 years). We found very limited (or no) data to inform most planned comparisons. Summary data were used to inform comparison of ranolazine versus placebo. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as unclear.For add-on ranolazine compared to placebo, no data were available to estimate cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. We found uncertainty about the effect of ranolazine on: all-cause mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.71; 3 studies, 2053 participants; low quality evidence); quality of life (any dose, SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.52; 4 studies, 1563 participants; I² = 73%; moderate quality evidence); and incidence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1000mg twice daily, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07; 2 studies, 1509 participants; low quality evidence). Add-on ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily reduced the fervour of angina episodes (MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.35; 3 studies, 2004 participants; I² = 39%; moderate quality evidence) but increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; 3 studies, 2053 participants; moderate quality evidence).For ranolazine as monotherapy compared to placebo, we found uncertain effect on cardiovascular mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.88; 1 study, 2604 participants; low quality evidence). No data were available to estimate non-cardiovascular mortality. We also found an uncertain effect on all-cause mortality for ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; 3 studies, 6249 participants; low quality evidence), quality of life (1000 mg twice daily, MD 0.28, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.13; 3 studies, 2254 participants; moderate quality evidence), non-fatal AMI incidence (any dose, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 3 studies, 2983 participants; I² = 50%; low quality evidence), and frequency of angina episodes (any dose, MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.01; 2 studies, 402 participants; low quality evidence). We found an increased risk for non-serious adverse events associated with ranolazine (any dose, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.00; 3 studies, 947 participants; very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found very low quality evidence showing that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as monotherapy had increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo. We found low quality evidence indicating that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on the risk of cardiovascular death (for ranolazine given as monotherapy), all-cause death and non-fatal AMI, and the frequency of angina episodes (for ranolazine given as monotherapy) compared to those given placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on quality of life compared with people who received placebo. Moderate quality evidence also indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as add-on therapy had fewer angina episodes but increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo.

Ranolazine, an Inhibitor of the Late Sodium Channel Current, Reduces Postischemic Myocardial Dysfunction in the Rabbit

Ranolazine is a selective inhibitor of the late sodium current relative to peak sodium channel current, and via this mechanism, it may decrease sodium-dependent intracellular calcium overload during ischemia and reperfusion. Ranolazine reduces the frequency of angina attacks, but there is little information on its effects on myocardial stunning after short-term ischemia. The objective of this study was to test the effects of ranolazine on left ventricular (LV) function and myocardial stunning after ischemia/reperfusion in rabbits. Myocardial stunning was induced in rabbits by 15 minutes of coronary artery occlusion (CAO) followed by 3 hours reperfusion. Ten minutes before CAO, rabbits were randomly assigned to vehicle (n = 15) or ranolazine (2 mg/kg bolus plus 60 μg/kg/min infusion, IV, n = 15). Myocardial stunning was assessed by LV 2-dimensional echocardiography using, as a marker of severity, ischemic free-wall fractional thickening (FWft; systolic wall thickness – diastolic wall thickness/diastolic wall thickness). Regional ejection fraction (EF) was also assessed. During CAO, FWft was depressed in both groups, indicating an ischemic insult (FWft was reduced from 0.62 ± 0.05 at baseline to 0.10 ± 0.04 in vehicle and from 0.73 ± 0.05 to 0.26 ± 0.07 in ranolazine, P < 0.05, ranolazine vs vehicle). After reperfusion, previously ischemic myocardium remained stunned; however, FWft recovered significantly better in ranolazine (0.51 ± 0.05) than in vehicle (0.35 ± 0.04, P = .027). Baseline EF was 0.65 ± 0.02 in the ranolazine and 0.68 ± 0.02 in vehicle ( P = ns). During CAO, EF was reduced by 36% ± 6% in vehicle versus only 20% ± 6% in ranolazine ( P < .05). At the end of reperfusion, EF remained depressed in both groups, but the reduction in the vehicle group (25% ± 5%) was significantly worse than in ranolazine (9% ± 4%, P = .017). Improvement in function was independent of necrosis (negligible) or differences in hemodynamics (no differences between groups). Ranolazine treatment reduced myocardial stunning following brief ischemia/reperfusion suggesting that inhibiting the late sodium channel current may be a novel approach to treating stunning independent of effects on hemodynamics.

Ranolazine: new approach for the treatment of stable angina pectoris

Myocardial ischemia is a metabolic problem involving reduced delivery of oxygen to cardiac mitochondria, resulting in less ATP formation, acceleration of glycolysis and production of lactate and H+ by the cell. Traditional therapies for ischemia aim at restoring the balance between mitochondrial ATP production and breakdown by reducing the need for ATP via suppression of heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac contractility, or by increasing oxygen delivery via increased myocardial blood flow. Despite optimal treatment with traditional hemodynamically oriented drugs (beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, Ca2+ channel antagonist and nitrates), many patients continue to suffer from angina. Thus, there is a need for anti-anginal drugs that act directly on cardiomyocytes to lessen the metabolic abnormalities induced by ischemia and reduce the symptoms (chest pain and exercise intolerance). Ranolazine has been demonstrated to improve exercise time to angina or 1 mm of ST-segment depression in a manner similar to currently approved drugs, but without any significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure at rest or during exercise. In two Phase III trials, ranolazine improved exercise tolerance and reduced the frequency of angina attacks in chronic severe angina patients when administered either as monotherapy or on a background of atenolol, amlodinine or diltiazem. At present, ranolazine is under review for US Food and Drug Administration approval and, if approved, it will represent the first drug of its class in the USA.

Safety and Efficacy of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Chronic Angina Pectoris

Coronary heart disease is a global malady and it is the leading cause of death in the United States. Chronic stable angina is the most common manifestation of coronary heart disease and it results from the imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand due to reduction in coronary blood flow. Therefore, in addition to lifestyle changes, commonly used pharmaceutical treatments for angina (nitrates, β-blockers, Ca2+ channel blockers) are aimed at increasing blood flow or decreasing O2 demand. However, patients may continue to experience symptoms of angina. Ranolazine is a relatively new drug with anti-anginal and anti-arrhythmic effects. Its anti-anginal mechanism is not clearly understood but the general consensus is that ranolazine brings about its anti-anginal effects by inhibiting the late Na+ current and the subsequent intracellular Ca2+ accumulation. Recent studies suggest other effects of ranolazine that may explain its anti-anginal and anti-arrhythmic effects. Nonetheless, clinical trials have proven the efficacy of ranolazine in treating chronic angina. It has been shown to be ineffective, however, in treating acute coronary syndrome patients. Ranolazine is a safe drug with minimal side effects. It is metabolized mainly in the liver and cleared by the kidney. Therefore, caution must be taken in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function. Due to its efficacy and safety, ranolazine was approved for the treatment of chronic angina by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006.

A cell-based phenotypic assay to identify cardioprotective agents

RATIONALE

Tissue ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury underlies several leading causes of death such as heart-attack and stroke. The lack of clinical therapies for IR injury may be partly due to the difficulty of adapting IR injury models to high-throughput screening (HTS).

OBJECTIVE

To develop a model of IR injury that is both physiologically relevant and amenable to HTS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A microplate-based respirometry apparatus was used. Controlling gas flow in the plate head space, coupled with the instrument's mechanical systems, yielded a 24-well model of IR injury in which H9c2 cardiomyocytes were transiently trapped in a small volume, rendering them ischemic. After initial validation with known protective molecules, the model was used to screen a 2000-molecule library, with post-IR cell death as an end point. Po2 and pH monitoring in each well also afforded metabolic data. Ten protective, detrimental, and inert molecules from the screen were subsequently tested in a Langendorff-perfused heart model of IR injury, revealing strong correlations between the screening end point and both recovery of cardiac function (negative, r2=0.66) and infarct size (positive, r2=0.62). Relationships between the effects of added molecules on cellular bioenergetics and protection against IR injury were also studied.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel cell-based assay can predict either protective or detrimental effects on IR injury in the intact heart. Its application may help identify therapeutic or harmful molecules.

Ranolazine reduces Ca2+ overload and oxidative stress and improves mitochondrial integrity to protect against ischemia reperfusion injury in isolated hearts

Ranolazine is a clinically approved drug for treating cardiac ventricular dysrhythmias and angina. Its mechanism(s) of protection is not clearly understood but evidence points to blocking the late Na+ current that arises during ischemia, blocking mitochondrial complex I activity, or modulating mitochondrial metabolism. Here we tested the effect of ranolazine treatment before ischemia at the mitochondrial level in intact isolated hearts and in mitochondria isolated from hearts at different times of reperfusion. Left ventricular (LV) pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), and O2 metabolism were measured in guinea pig isolated hearts perfused with Krebs-Ringer's solution; mitochondrial (m) superoxide (O2·-), Ca2+, NADH/FAD (redox state), and cytosolic (c) Ca2+ were assessed on-line in the LV free wall by fluorescence spectrophotometry. Ranolazine (5 μM), infused for 1 min just before 30 min of global ischemia, itself did not change O2·-, cCa2+, mCa2+ or redox state. During late ischemia and reperfusion (IR) O2·- emission and m[Ca2+] increased less in the ranolazine group vs. the control group. Ranolazine decreased c[Ca2+] only during ischemia while NADH and FAD were not different during IR in the ranolazine vs. control groups. Throughout reperfusion LVP and CF were higher, and ventricular fibrillation was less frequent. Infarct size was smaller in the ranolazine group than in the control group. Mitochondria isolated from ranolazine-treated hearts had mild resistance to permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening and less cytochrome c release than control hearts. Ranolazine may provide functional protection of the heart during IR injury by reducing cCa2+ and mCa2+ loading secondary to its effect to block the late Na+ current. Subsequently it indirectly reduces O2·- emission, preserves bioenergetics, delays mPTP opening, and restricts loss of cytochrome c, thereby reducing necrosis and apoptosis.

Late sodium current inhibition as a new cardioprotective approach

There is increasing evidence that the late sodium current of the sodium channel in myocytes plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia and thus is a potential therapeutic target in patients with ischemic heart disease. Ranolazine, an inhibitor of the late sodium current, reduces the frequency and severity of anginal attacks and ST-segment depression in humans, and unlike other antianginal drugs, ranolazine does not alter heart rate or blood pressure. In experimental animal models, ranolazine has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size and to improve left ventricular function after acute ischemia and chronic heart failure. This article reviews published data describing the role of late sodium current and its inhibition by ranolazine in clinical and experimental studies of myocardial ischemia.

The Antianginal Agent, Ranolazine, Reduces Myocardial Infarct Size but Does Not Alter Anatomic No-Reflow or Regional Myocardial Blood Flow in Ischemia/Reperfusion in the Rabbit

It has been suggested that ranolazine protects the ischemic/reperfused heart by reducing diastolic wall pressure during ischemia. However, there is limited information regarding the effect of ranolazine on the anatomic zone of no-flow in a model of acute myocardial occlusion/reperfusion. Before coronary artery occlusion (CAO), open-chest anesthetized rabbits were assigned to vehicle or ranolazine. Hearts received 60 minutes of CAO and 3 hours reperfusion. Ischemic risk zone was comparable in the 2 groups. Ranolazine significantly reduced infarct size. There was a non-significant trend for the no-reflow defect to be smaller in the ranolazine group. Regional myocardial blood flow was similar in both groups in the risk zone during ischemia and at 3 hours reperfusion. Heart rates were similar in both groups, whereas mean arterial pressure was reduced in the ranolazine group. While ranolazine was effective in reducing myocardial infarct size, the mechanism by which it did this was independent of improving perfusion during either ischemia or reperfusion, suggesting that ranolazine's effect of reducing infarct size involves alternative mechanisms.

Analytical and semipreparative resolution of ranolazine enantiomers by liquid chromatography using polysaccharide chiral stationary phases

Novel HPLC methods were developed for the analytical and semipreparative resolution of new antianginal drug ranolazine enantiomers. Good baseline enantioseparation was achieved using cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) (CDMPC) chiral stationary phases (CSPs) under both normal-phase and polar organic modes. The validation of the analytical methods including linearity, LODs, recovery, and precision, and the semipreparative resolution of ranolazine racemate were carried out using methanol as mobile phase without any basic and acidic additives under polar organic mode, using CDMPC CSPs. At analytical scale, the elution times of both enantiomers were less than 7.5 min at 20 degrees C and 1.0 mL/min, with the separation factor (a) 1.88 and the resolution factor (R(s)) 2.95. At semipreparative scale, about 14.3 mg/h enantiomers could be isolated and elution times of both enantiomers were less than 13 min at 2.0 mL/min. To increase the throughput, the technique of overlapping injections was used. The first eluted enantiomer was isolated with a purity of 99.6% enantiomer excess (e.e.) and > 99.0% yield. The second enantiomer was isolated with a purity of 98.8% e.e. and > 99.0% yield. In addition, optical rotation and circular dichroism spectroscopy of both ranolazine enantiomers isolated were also investigated.

Ranolazine*

Ranolazine is a novel new antianginal agent currently under investigation as monotherapy and adjunct therapy for the treatment of chronic stable angina. While the mechanism of action of ranolazine is not completely understood, it is believed to involve a reduction in fatty acid oxidation, ultimately leading to a shift in myocardial energy production from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation. Since the oxidation of glucose requires less oxygen than the oxidation of fatty acids, ranolazine can help maintain myocardial function in times of ischemia. In addition, ranolazine has minimal effect on blood pressure and heart rate. Ranolazine, by inhibiting cellular ionic channels, prolongs the corrected QT interval. However, ranolazine has not yet been associated with any incidences of ventricular arrhythmia. The clinical data with ranolazine focuses on its use in chronic stable angina, where it has been shown to increase exercise tolerance and decrease angina compared with placebo, as well as in combination with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers. The use of ranolazine for other cardiac conditions and the effect of ranolazine on morbidity and mortality remains to be determined. Ongoing clinical trials will help further establish the role of ranolazine in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Ranolazine: ion-channel-blocking actions and in vivo electrophysiological effects

Ranolazine is a novel anti-ischemic drug that prolongs the QT interval. To evaluate the potential mechanisms and consequences, we studied: (i) Ranolazine's effects on HERG and IsK currents in Xenopus oocytes with two-electrode voltage clamp; (ii) effects of ranolazine, compared to d-sotalol, on effective refractory period (ERP), QT interval and ventricular rhythm in a dog model of acquired long QT syndrome; and (iii) effects on selected native currents in canine atrial myocytes with whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Ranolazine inhibited HERG and IsK currents with different potencies. HERG was inhibited with an IC(50) of 106 micromol l(-1), whereas the IC(50) for IsK was 1.7 mmol l(-1). d-Sotalol caused reverse use-dependent ERP and QT interval prolongation, whereas ranolazine produced modest, nonsignificant increases that plateaued at submaximal doses. Neither drug affected QRS duration. d-Sotalol had clear proarrhythmic effects, with all d-sotalol-treated dogs developing torsades de pointes (TdP) ventricular tachyarrhythmias, of which they ultimately died. In contrast, ranolazine did not generate TdP. Effects on I(Kr) and I(Ks) were similar to those on HERG and IsK. Ranolazine blocked I(Ca) with an IC(50) of approximately 300 micromol l(-1). I(Na) was unaffected. We conclude that ranolazine inhibits I(Kr) by blocking HERG currents, inhibits I(Ca) at slightly larger concentrations, and has modest and self-limited effects on the QT interval. Unlike d-sotalol, ranolazine does not cause TdP in a dog model. The greater safety of ranolazine may be due to its ability to inhibit I(Ca) at concentrations only slightly larger than those that inhibit I(Kr), thus producing offsetting effects on repolarization.

Ranolazine: a potential new treatment for chronic stable angina

Ranolazine is a novel antianginal agent currently under investigation as monotherapy and adjunct therapy for the treatment of chronic stable angina. Although the mechanism of action of ranolazine is not completely understood, it is believed to involve a reduction in fatty acid oxidation, ultimately leading to a shift in myocardial energy production from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation. Because the oxidation of glucose requires less oxygen than the oxidation of fatty acids, ranolazine can help maintain myocardial function in times of ischemia. In addition, ranolazine does not significantly affect blood pressure, heart rate, or cardiac conduction. The clinical data with ranolazine focuses on its use in chronic stable angina, where it has been shown to increase exercise tolerance and decrease angina compared with placebo and in combination with beta-blockers and calcium-channel blockers. The use of ranolazine for other cardiac conditions and the effect of ranolazine on morbidity and mortality remain to be determined.

Ranolazine, a partial fatty acid oxidation inhibitor, reduces myocardial infarct size and cardiac troponin T release in the rat

Ranolazine reduces cellular acetyl-CoA content via inhibition of fatty acid beta-oxidation and activates pyruvate dehydrogenase. This metabolic switch increases ATP production per mole of oxygen consumed, reduces the rise in lactic acid and acidosis, and maintains myocardial function under conditions of reduced myocardial oxygen delivery. It is still unclear whether ranolazine causes a reduction of (i) infarct size and (ii) cardiac troponin T release, in a male Wistar rat model of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion (25 min) and reperfusion (2 h). Rats were subjected to saline infusion (n=12) or ranolazine (bolus injection: 10 mg/kg plus infusion: 9.6 mg/kg/h, n=12), 30 min prior to left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion-reperfusion, respectively. Ranolazine caused a significant reduction in myocardial infarct size of approximately 33% compared to saline control (P<0.05). In addition, infusion of ranolazine significantly attenuated the release of cardiac troponin T into the plasma from 65+/-14 (controls) to 12+/-2 ng/ml. This study demonstrates for the first time that ranolazine significantly reduces (i) infarct size and (ii) cardiac troponin T release in rats subjected to left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion-reperfusion.

Role of metabolically active drugs in the management of ischemic heart disease

This article reviews the fundamentals of myocardial energy metabolism and selectively outlines the use of several metabolically active drug therapies in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. These drugs - ranolazine, trimetazidine, dichloroacetate (DCA), glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) solutions, and L-carnitine - have mechanisms of action distinct from traditional anti-ischemic drugs. These agents work by shifting myocardial energy metabolism away from fatty acids toward glucose as a source of fuel. Because these agents are well tolerated and do not affect heart rate or blood pressure, they conceivably could supplement traditional anti-ischemic drug therapy with little risk. The background, rationale for use, and published literature on each agent is reviewed, and the outcomes of pertinent clinical trials are discussed. In the case of ranolazine, data suggest benefit in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, particularly with sustained release formulations. Trimetazidine appears to have similar physiologic effects to ranolazine, and it is effective as monotherapy and as additive therapy in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. DCA improves acidosis in critically ill patients and, likewise, improves myocardial hemodynamics in those with chronic coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure; however, its metabolism is variable and clinical data on its use in chronic ischemic heart disease are limited. GIK solutions have been shown to be beneficial in animal and human models of ischemia and acute myocardial infarction, and they offer an inexpensive means by which to improve the oxidation of glucose in the heart. Lastly, a large body of literature suggests a benefit with L-carnitine in a number of cardiovascular illnesses, including ischemic heart disease. Clinical trial data in acute myocardial infarction are promising and have prompted the initiation of a large-scale mortality trial.

Ranolazine attenuates palmitoyl-L-carnitine-induced mechanical and metabolic derangement in the isolated, perfused rat heart

The effect of ranolazine, a novel anti-ischaemic drug that stimulates the activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase, on palmitoyl-L-carnitine-induced mechanical dysfunction and metabolic derangement in isolated perfused rat hearts has been studied and compared with the effect of dichloroacetate, an activator of pyruvate dehydrogenase. Rat hearts paced electrically were perfused aerobically at constant flow by the Langendorff technique. Palmitoyl-L-carnitine (4 microM) increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and reduced left ventricular developed pressure (i.e. induced mechanical dysfunction); it also reduced tissue levels of adenosine triphosphate and increased tissue levels of adenosine monophosphate (i.e. induced metabolic derangement). These functional and metabolic alterations induced by palmitoyl-L-carnitine were attenuated by ranolazine (5, 10, and 20 microM) in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, dichloroacetate (1 and 10 mM) did not attenuate palmitoyl-L-carnitine-induced mechanical and metabolic derangement. In the normal (palmitoyl-L-carnitine-untreated) heart, however, ranolazine did not modify mechanical function and energy metabolism. These results suggest that ranolazine attenuates palmitoyl-L-carnitine-induced mechanical and metabolic derangement in the rat heart, and that the beneficial action of ranolazine is not because of the energy-sparing effect or activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase.

Treatment of stable angina

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many nonobstructive plaques, which are prone to fissures or rupture resulting in presentation of acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). In addition to symptomatic relief of symptoms and an increase in angina-free walking time with antianginal drugs or revascularization procedures, the recent emphasis of treatment has been to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (coronary death and myocardial infarction). The role of smoking cessation, aspirin, treatment of elevated lipids, and treatment of high blood pressure in all patients and of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with diminished systolic left ventricular systolic function in reducing adverse outcomes has been well established. What is unknown, however, is whether any anti-anginal drugs (beta-blockers, long-acting nitrates, calcium channel blockers) effect adverse outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris. Recent trials evaluated the usefulness of suppression of ambulatory ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris, but it remains to be established whether suppression of ambulatory myocardial ischemia with antianginal agents or revascularization therapy is superior to pharmacologic therapy targeting symptom relief. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical treatment and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for newer techniques of transmyocardial revascularization, enhanced external counterpulsation, spinal cord stimulation, or sympathectomy. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized clinical trials.

A controlled trial with a novel anti-ischemic agent, ranolazine, in chronic stable angina pectoris that is responsive to conventional antianginal agents. Ranolazine Study Group

We assessed efficacy and safety of a new anti-ischemic agent, ranolazine, during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. In the qualifying phase, we withdrew at least 1 antianginal drug from the drug regimen of 312 patients with chronic stable angina while they took placebo. After exercise time had shortened by > or =1.0 minute, we randomly assigned patients to receive either immediate-release ranolazine in 3 dosing regimens or placebo during each treatment period. After each week of treatment, we measured exercise tolerance and ranolazine plasma concentrations at both peak and trough. All exercise parameters significantly (p< or =0.02) improved (intention-to-treat analysis) with ranolazine (all regimens combined) at mean peak plasma concentrations ranging from 1,576 to 2,492 ng/ml compared with placebo without differences in double product. Although similar trends persisted at mean trough, plasma concentrations (range 275 to 602 ng/ml), only the time to 1.0 mm ST-segment depression remained statistically significant. In conclusion, immediate-release ranolazine is effective and well tolerated. However, this immediate-release short-acting formulation with this dosing regimen is not adequate for continuous protection. Either larger or more frequent doses or a sustained-release formulation would be required for clinical use.

Effects of ranolazine on the exercise capacity of rats with chronic heart failure induced by myocardial infarction

Ranolazine was previously shown to stimulate cardiac glucose oxidation. Dichloroacetate (DCA) also does and was shown to improve exercise capacity in animals, but it has long-term toxicity problems. To test the hypothesis that ranolazine would increase exercise performance in the chronic heart failure (CHF) condition, we compared the exercise endurance capacities of rats with a surgically induced myocardial infarction (MI) with those of noninfarcted sham-operated (Sham) controls both before and after 14 and 28 days of drug administration. Chronic administration of ranolazine, 50 mg/kg twice daily (b.i.d.) oral, significantly reduced the endurance capacities of both Sham and MI rats (measured after a 12-h fast to reduce liver glycogen stores), as indicated by the reductions in run times to fatigue during a progressive treadmill test. Ranolazine produced reductions in resting plasma lactate and glucose concentrations of animals fasted for 12 h (consistent with stimulating glucose oxidation); however, tissue glycogen concentrations measured in various locomotor muscles located in the animal's hindlimb were unaffected when measured 48 h after the last treadmill test and after 12 h of fasting. Chronic administration of ranolazine did not increase the endurance capacity of rats with CHF induced by MI at the dosage and with the protocol used. To the contrary, the chronic administration of ranolazine appears to reduce the work capacity of all rats, suggesting that this drug may not be useful therapeutically in the treatment of CHF. Whether the decrements in endurance capacity produced by ranolazine are related to the high plasma concentrations of the drug produced in this study as compared with previous studies in humans remains subject to further experimentation.

Estimation of ranolazine and eleven phase I metabolites in human plasma by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring

The estimation of ranolazine, a novel piperazine derivative, and eleven of its Phase I metabolites has been undertaken by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry (LC-APCI-MS). Plasma samples, taken on day 5 of a multiple-dose study, were extracted by solid-phase extraction (SPE) and analysed, using a gradient HPLC system coupled to the APCI source of a Finnigan MAT TSQ 700 mass spectrometer. Metabolites were analysed in selected-ion monitoring (SIM) mode, using an instrument control language (ICL) procedure. The LC-MS combination allowed resolution of all eleven metabolites, including four hydroxylated metabolites and five unresolved components. The results from the linear regression showed good correlation (r2 > 0.980) for all the metabolites. Plasma concentrations indicated that three metabolites were present at levels higher than 10% of the parent compound.

The characterization of the metabolites of ranolazine in man by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

The metabolism of ranolazine (RS-43285) or (+)N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-4[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-propyl]-1- piperazine acetamide dihydrochloride was investigated in man using plasma samples obtained from four different clinical studies. The metabolite profiles following single and multiple doses of 342 mg instant release (IR) ranolazine, following multiple doses of 1000 mg sustained release (SR) ranolazine and following dosing with both ranolazine (IR) and a potentially co-administered drug, diltiazem, were compared. Metabolism of ranolazine in man was shown by LC/MS analysis to be extensive with up to seven primary routes of metabolism identified. N-dealkylation by hydrolysis at the piperazine ring produced three metabolites whilst O-demethylation and O-dearylation at the methoxyphenoxy moiety produced a further two compounds. Additionally, hydrolysis of the amide group formed one other species. Oxygenation at various points in the molecule produced a further four metabolites. Direct conjugation of ranolazine with glucuronic acid and with an uncharacterized adduct were also identified as a route of elimination. Ten other biotransformation products were formed as a result of multiple metabolic steps. Conjugation was also associated with the desmethyl metabolite (glucuronide and unidentified conjugates) of hydroxylated ranolazine. In a previous publication (Journal of Chromatography, 1995, accepted for publication) semi-quantitative analyses of pooled plasma from the study where ranolazine was dosed at 1000 mg twice daily showed that of the twelve metabolites studied only four accounted for AUC's in excess of 10% of the ranolazine AUC.

Double-blind efficacy and safety study of a novel anti-ischemic agent, ranolazine, versus placebo in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Ranolazine Study Group

BACKGROUND

Ranolazine modulates the metabolism of ischemic myocardial cells and improves the efficiency of oxygen use. This study was conducted to evaluate the antianginal and anti-ischemic effects and safety of different doses of ranolazine administered three times daily (tid) compared with placebo in patients with stable angina pectoris.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with stable angina pectoris took part in the study. Previous antianginal drugs were discontinued under medical supervision. Three hundred nineteen patients received single-blind placebo for up to 18 days, and 318 stopped exercise because of angina of moderate severity, had evidence of myocardial ischemia (> or = 1-mm ST segment depression), and were randomized to one of four study groups in a double-blind manner: ranolazine 30 mg tid (n = 81), ranolazine 60 mg tid (n = 81), ranolazine 120 mg tid (n = 78), and placebo tid (n = 79). After the 4-week double-blind phase, symptom-limited exercise tests were repeated at 1 hour (peak test) and 8 hours (trough test) after the study medication was administered. In addition, patients kept an angina diary throughout the study and wore a Holter monitor for 48 hours. Total exercise duration at baseline (+/- SEM) was 5.9 +/- 0.2 minutes for the placebo group and 6.4 +/- 0.3, 5.9 +/- 0.3, and 6.6 +/- 0.2 minutes for the ranolazine 30-, 60-, and 120-mg groups, respectively (P = NS). After 4 weeks of double-blind therapy, compared with baseline values, at 1 hour after the study medication was administered (peak effect), total exercise duration (+/- SEM) increased by 0.45 +/- 0.2 minutes in the placebo group and by 0.3 +/- 0.2, 0.6 +/- 0.2, and 0.5 +/- 0.2 minutes in the ranolazine 30-, 60-, and 120-mg groups, respectively (placebo versus ranolazine, P = NS). Times to 1-mm ST segment depression at baseline were similar in the four groups and, after 4 weeks of therapy in each group, increased significantly by similar magnitudes at 1 hour after the administration of the medications. Similar changes were seen for the time to onset of angina. Eight hours after administration (trough effect), no differences in total exercise time or any other exercise variables were observed between the placebo and the ranolazine groups. Compared with the baseline values, the number of anginal attacks per week and the number and duration of ischemic episodes per 48 hours during Holter monitoring decreased significantly by similar magnitudes in the placebo and ranolazine groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with ranolazine 30, 60, and 120 mg tid was not superior to placebo. Our study does not support the published beneficial effects of similar doses of ranolazine on either myocardial ischemia or exercise performance or on anginal attacks during daily life in patients with angina pectoris.

Protective effects of ranolazine in guinea-pig hearts during low-flow ischaemia and their association with increases in active pyruvate dehydrogenase

1. In isolated Langendorff-perfused, electrically-paced, hearts of guinea-pigs, global low-flow-ischaemia (LFI; at 0.7 ml min-1) resulted in marked increases in the rates of release of lactate, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatine kinase (CK) over a 30 min period. At the end of the LFI period, tissue ATP content was significantly reduced from a control value of 11.8 +/- 0.8 (5) to 5.6 +/- 0.8 (5) mumol g-1 dry weight. 2. The presence of ranolazine [(+/-)-N-(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-4[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methoxy-phenoxyl)- propyl] - l-piperazine acetamide dihydro-chloride; RS-43285-193] at 10 microM, from 20 min prior to and during LFI, resulted in significant reductions in the release of lactate, LDH and CK during the ischaemic period and a significant preservation of tissue ATP (9.0 +/- 1.1 (6) mumol g-1 dry wt.). Ranolazine did not prevent the reductions in creatine phosphate or glycogen observed in LFI, nor did it have any significant effects on any contractile parameters before or during the LFI period. 3. Neither ranolazine nor LFI affected the total amounts of tissue pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity; however, the significant reduction in the amount of active, non-phosphorylated PDH caused by LFI (from 88.2 +/- 5.5 to 44.2 +/- 3.2% of total activity) was partially but significantly prevented by ranolazine (67.2 +/- 6.8%). This effect of ranolazine on PDH may be part of the mechanism whereby the compound reduces lactate release and preserves tissue ATP during ischaemia.