Influence of single- and multiple-dose omeprazole treatment on nifedipine pharmacokinetics and effects in healthy subjects

Effect of Omeprazole Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Extended-Release Nifedipine in Healthy Subjects

Oral extended-release (ER) dosage forms have been used to sustain blood drug levels, reduce adverse events, and improve patient compliance. We investigated potential effects of comedication on pharmacokinetic exposure of nifedipine ER products with different formulation designs and manufacturing processes. A clinical study compared a generic version of nifedipine ER tablet with pH-dependent dissolution behavior with an osmotic pump product with pH independent drug release under fasting condition. In this study, two nifedipine tablet products were tested with or without short-term omeprazole comedication in healthy subjects. Seven-day administration of omeprazole before nifedipine dosing significantly increased the gastric pH, and subsequently increased the geometric least square (LS) means of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable timepoint (AUC0-t ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of nifedipine to 132.6% (90% confidence interval (CI): 120.6-145.7%) and 112.8% (90% CI: 100.8-126.3%) for pH-dependent ER tablets, and 120.6% (90% CI: 109.7-132.5%) and 122.5% (90% CI: 113.7-131.9%) for the pH-independent ER tablets, respectively. Similar extent of increase in AUC0-t and Cmax was confirmed in the subpopulations whose gastric pH was ≥ 4 or ≤ 3 in subjects with or without omeprazole administration. Given that similar increases in drug exposures were observed for both pH-dependent and pH-independent nifedipine formulations and the geometric LS mean ratios were between 112% and 133% with and without short-term omeprazole comedication, the gastric pH may have limited effects on omeprazole-induced nifedipine PK changes on the tested formulations. The inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 activity may play a significant role causing nifedipine exposure changes for both formulations, which would warrant additional assessment.

Simultaneous Determination of Loratadine and Its Metabolite Desloratadine in Beagle Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study of Loratadine Tablets and Omeprazole‑Induced Drug-Drug Interaction

Background

Loratadine (LTD) is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System II basic drug with pH-sensitive aqueous solubility and dissolution is a speed-limiting step of its absorption. The drug dissolution and the gastrointestinal tract pH conditions are likely to influence the in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior of LTD tablets.

Materials and Method

A rapid, sensitive, and reliable bioanalytical method for simultaneous quantitation of LTD and its active metabolite desloratadine (DL) in beagle plasma was developed and validated based on liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Sample preparation in low plasma consumption was accomplished by liquid–liquid extraction. The chromatographic separation was achieved on a Phenomenex Kinetex C8 column using acetonitrile and 5 mM ammonium formate as the mobile phase. A comparative pharmacokinetics study of three LTD tablets with different dissolution rates was conducted in male beagles in fasting state and an omeprazole-induced drug–drug interaction (DDI) study was subsequently performed under pretreatment of omeprazole.

Results and Conclusion

The method showed a good linear correlation over the concentration ranges of 0.008–24 ng/mL for LTD and 0.8–800 ng/mL for DL, and was successfully applied to analyze the two compounds in beagle plasma. Pharmacokinetic results showed in the fasting state the three LTD tablets were equivalent in beagles in terms of effective components. DL of the three tablets were equivalent, indicating metabolite was less susceptible to pharmaceutic preparation factors for LTD tablets in beagles. Moreover, significant changes in LTD and DL pharmacokinetics parameters were observed under the effect of omeprazole-induced pH increase in gastrointestinal tract, suggesting that DDI effects are of concern for the curative effect of LTD when combined with omeprazole. The findings will contribute to the future pharmaceutical preparations research as well as the clinical application of LTD.

Influence of Piperine and Omeprazole on The Regional Absorption of Daclatasvir from Rabbit Intestine

The study assessed the site dependent intestinal absorption of daclatasvir and investigated the effects of piperine and omeprazole on such absorption utilizing in situ rabbit intestinal perfusion technique. The intestinal absorption of daclatasvir was assessed in four segments: duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon. The effect of co-perfusion with omeprazole was monitored through the tested anatomical sites. The effect of piperine, a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor on daclatasvir absorption from jejunum and ileum was tested. The results showed that daclatasvir was incompletely absorbed from the rabbit small and large intestine. The absorptive clearance per unit length (PeA/L) was site dependent and was ranked as colon > duodenum > jejunum > ileum. This rank is the opposite of the rank of P-gp intestinal content suggesting possible influence for P-gp. Co-perfusion with omeprazole increased PeA/L and this was evidenced also with reduced the L95% of daclatasvir from both small and large intestinal segments. Significant enhancement in daclatasvir absorption through jejunum and ileum was shown in presence of piperine. Daclatasvir showed site dependent intestinal absorption in a manner suggesting its affection by P-gp efflux. This effect was inhibited by piperine. Co-administration of daclatasvir with omeprazole can enhance intestinal absorption a phenomenon which requires extension to human pharmacokinetic investigation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Gastroprotective Effect of Enteral Nutrition Formula in Mice Injected Subcutaneously with Indomethacin

We have previously shown that two enteral nutrition formulas suppressed gastric lesions induced by the oral administration of indomethacin (IND) in mice. However, the mechanism of their protective effect is unknown. In this study, the effect of the two enteral nutrition formulas on gastric lesions induced by subcutaneous IND injection was investigated, with the objective of exploring the possibility that they may interact directly with IND in the gastrointestinal tract. Ten-week-old, male, ICR mice were fasted, then orally given either purified water, Mermed^® One, or 2-fold diluted Terumeal^® 2.0α as enteral nutrition formula (25 mL/kg). IND was injected subcutaneously at 20 mg/kg after 30 min, and the stomach was removed 6 h later and fixed in formalin. The number and area of lesions in the stomachs of mice given enteral nutrition formula was reduced to 56–89% and 34–61%, respectively, compared with the mice given purified water. The time courses of plasma IND concentrations were comparable among the three groups. These results suggested that the effect of these enteral nutrition formulas on gastric lesions did not originate from their direct interaction with IND in the gastrointestinal tract or their effect on the disposition of IND.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach to Identify the Drug-Drug Interaction Mechanism of Nifedipine and a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Omeprazole

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can affect the intragastric release of other drugs from their dosage forms by elevating the gastric pH. They may also influence drug absorption and metabolism by interacting with P-glycoprotein or with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Nifedipine is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II drug with low solubility across physiologic pH and high permeability. Previous studies have demonstrated that drug-drug interaction (DDI) existed between omeprazole and nifedipine with significantly increased systemic exposure of nifedipine in subjects after pre-treatment for 7 days with omeprazole compared to the subjects without omeprazole treatment. It was shown that omeprazole not only induced an increase in intragastric pH, but also inhibited the CYP3A4 activity, while CYP3A4-mediated oxidation is the main metabolic pathway of nifedipine. The purpose of this study is to apply a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach to investigate the DDI mechanism for an immediate release formulation of nifedipine with omeprazole.

METHODS

A previously published model for omeprazole was modified to integrate metabolites and to update CYP inhibition based on the most updated published in vitro data. We simulated the nifedipine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects with or without the multiple-dose pretreatment of omeprazole (20 mg) following oral administrations of immediate-release (IR) (10 mg) nifedipine. Nifedipine solubility at different pHs was used to simulate the nifedipine pharmacokinetics for both clinical arms. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to understand the impact of gastric pH and the CYP3A4-mediated gut and liver first pass metabolism on the overall nifedipine pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

The developed PBPK model properly described the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and predicted the inhibitory effect of multiple-dose omeprazole on CYP3A4 activity. With the incorporation of the physiologic effect of omeprazole on both gastric pH and CYP3A4 to the PBPK model, the verified PBPK model allows evaluating the impact of the increase in gastric pH and/or CYP3A4 inhibition. The simulated results show that the nifedipine metabolic inhibition by omeprazole may play an important role in the DDI between nifedipine and omeprazole for IR nifedipine formulation.

CONCLUSION

The developed full PBPK model with the capability to simulate DDI by considering gastric pH change and metabolic inhibition provides a mechanistic understanding of the observed DDI of nifedipine with a PPI, omeprazole.

The Clinician's Guide to Proton Pump Inhibitor Related Adverse Events

A substantial volume of literature exists linking proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use with a multitude of serious adverse events. There is uncertainty, however, over whether these associations are clinically important. Excessive concern about PPI-related adverse events may leave patients at risk of harm by leaving acid-related upper gastrointestinal disease untreated. Conversely, the risk of treatments may outweigh the benefits if any of the purported adverse events are directly caused by PPI use; this is of particular concern where indications for PPI use are not present. In this paper, we review the studies which have reported associations between adverse events and PPI use, discuss the proposed mechanisms of action, grade the confidence in whether these associations are truly causal, and provide advice regarding balancing the benefits of PPI use against their possible harms.

Effects of medicines used to treat gastrointestinal diseases on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered drugs: a PEARRL Review

OBJECTIVES

Drugs used to treat gastrointestinal diseases (GI drugs) are widely used either as prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medications and belong to both the 10 most prescribed and 10 most sold OTC medications worldwide. The objective of this review article is to discuss the most frequent interactions between GI and other drugs, including identification of the mechanisms behind these interactions, where possible.

KEY FINDINGS

Current clinical practice shows that in many cases, these drugs are administered concomitantly with other drug products. Due to their metabolic properties and mechanisms of action, the drugs used to treat gastrointestinal diseases can change the pharmacokinetics of some coadministered drugs. In certain cases, these interactions can lead to failure of treatment or to the occurrence of serious adverse events. The mechanism of interaction depends highly on drug properties and differs among therapeutic categories. Understanding these interactions is essential to providing recommendations for optimal drug therapy.

SUMMARY

Interactions with GI drugs are numerous and can be highly significant clinically in some cases. While alterations in bioavailability due to changes in solubility, dissolution rate, GI transit and metabolic interactions can be (for the most part) easily identified, interactions that are mediated through other mechanisms, such as permeability or microbiota, are less well-understood. Future work should focus on characterising these aspects.

Evaluation of a Novel Renewable Hepatic Cell Model for Prediction of Clinical CYP3A4 Induction Using a Correlation-Based Relative Induction Score Approach

Metabolism enzyme induction-mediated drug-drug interactions need to be carefully characterized in vitro for drug candidates to predict in vivo safety risk and therapeutic efficiency. Currently, both the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency recommend using primary human hepatocytes as the gold standard in vitro test system for studying the induction potential of candidate drugs on cytochrome P450 (CYP), CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2B6. However, primary human hepatocytes are known to bear inherent limitations such as limited supply and large lot-to-lot variations, which result in an experimental burden to qualify new lots. To overcome these shortcomings, a renewable source of human hepatocytes (i.e., Corning HepatoCells) was developed from primary human hepatocytes and was evaluated for in vitro CYP3A4 induction using methods well established by the pharmaceutical industry. HepatoCells have shown mature hepatocyte-like morphology and demonstrated primary hepatocyte-like response to prototypical inducers of all three CYP enzymes with excellent consistency. Importantly, HepatoCells retain a phenobarbital-responsive nuclear translocation of human constitutive androstane receptor from the cytoplasm, characteristic to primary hepatocytes. To validate HepatoCells as a useful tool to predict potential clinical relevant CYP3A4 induction, we tested three different lots of HepatoCells with a group of clinical strong, moderate/weak CYP3A4 inducers, and noninducers. A relative induction score calibration curve-based approach was used for prediction. HepatoCells showed accurate prediction comparable to primary human hepatocytes. Together, these results demonstrate that Corning HepatoCells is a reliable in vitro model for drug-drug interaction studies during the early phase of drug testing.

Evaluating a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for prediction of omeprazole clearance and assessing ethnic sensitivity in CYP2C19 metabolic pathway

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ethnicity-specific population models in the SimCYP Simulator® for prediction of omeprazole clearance with attention to differences in the CYP2C19 metabolic pathway.

METHODS

The SimCYP® models incorporating Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese population-specific demographic, physiological, and enzyme data were applied to simulate omeprazole pharmacokinetics. Published pharmacokinetic data of omeprazole after intravenous or oral administration in Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese were used for the evaluation.

RESULTS

Following oral administration, the ratio of the predicted to observed geometric mean of omeprazole clearance in Caucasian extensive metabolizers (EMs) was 0.88. The ratios in Chinese EMs were 1.16 and 0.99 after intravenous and oral administration, respectively. The ratios in Japanese EMs were 0.88 and 0.71 after intravenous and oral administration, respectively. Significant differences (2-fold) in the observed oral clearance of omeprazole were identified between Caucasian and Asian (Chinese and Japanese) EMs while the observed oral and intravenous clearances of omeprazole were similar between Chinese and Japanese EMs. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) models within SimCYP accurately predicted the difference in the observed oral clearance between Caucasian and Chinese EMs but overpredicted the difference between Caucasians and Japanese EMs due to under-prediction of oral clearance in Japanese EMs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBPK model within SimCYP adequately predicted omeprazole clearance in Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese EMs and the 2-fold differences in clearance of omeprazole between Caucasian and Asian EMs. This may lead to early identification of ethnic sensitivity in clearance and the need for different dosing regimens in a specific ethnic group for substrates of CYP2C19 which can support the rational design of bridging clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors: an update

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used extensively for the treatment of gastric acid-related disorders, often over the long term, which raises the potential for clinically significant drug interactions in patients receiving concomitant medications. These drug–drug interactions have been previously reviewed. However, the current knowledge is likely to have advanced, so a thorough review of the literature published since 2006 was conducted. This identified new studies of drug interactions that are modulated by gastric pH. These studies showed the effect of a PPI-induced increase in intragastric pH on mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetics, which were characterised by a decrease in the maximum exposure and availability of mycophenolic acid, at least at early time points. Post-2006 data were also available outlining the altered pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors with concomitant PPI exposure. New data for the more recently marketed dexlansoprazole suggest it has no impact on the pharmacokinetics of diazepam, phenytoin, theophylline and warfarin. The CYP2C19-mediated interaction that seems to exist between clopidogrel and omeprazole or esomeprazole has been shown to be clinically important in research published since the 2006 review; this effect is not seen as a class effect of PPIs. Finally, data suggest that coadministration of PPIs with methotrexate may affect methotrexate pharmacokinetics, although the mechanism of interaction is not well understood. As was shown in the previous review, individual PPIs differ in their propensities to interact with other drugs and the extent to which their interaction profiles have been defined. The interaction profiles of omeprazole and pantoprazole sodium (pantoprazole-Na) have been studied most extensively. Several studies have shown that omeprazole carries a considerable potential for drug interactions because of its high affinity for CYP2C19 and moderate affinity for CYP3A4. In contrast, pantoprazole-Na appears to have lower potential for interactions with other medications. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole also seem to have a weaker potential for interactions than omeprazole, although their interaction profiles, along with those of esomeprazole and dexlansoprazole, have been less extensively investigated. Only a few drug interactions involving PPIs are of clinical significance. Nonetheless, the potential for drug interactions should be considered when choosing a PPI to manage gastric acid-related disorders. This is particularly relevant for elderly patients taking multiple medications, or for those receiving a concomitant medication with a narrow therapeutic index.

Evaluation of calibration curve-based approaches to predict clinical inducers and noninducers of CYP3A4 with plated human hepatocytes

Cytochrome P450 (P450) induction is often considered a liability in drug development. Using calibration curve-based approaches, we assessed the induction parameters R3 (a term indicating the amount of P450 induction in the liver, expressed as a ratio between 0 and 1), relative induction score, Cmax/EC50, and area under the curve (AUC)/F2 (the concentration causing 2-fold increase from baseline of the dose-response curve), derived from concentration-response curves of CYP3A4 mRNA and enzyme activity data in vitro, as predictors of CYP3A4 induction potential in vivo. Plated cryopreserved human hepatocytes from three donors were treated with 20 test compounds, including several clinical inducers and noninducers of CYP3A4. After the 2-day treatment, CYP3A4 mRNA levels and testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity were determined by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis, respectively. Our results demonstrated a strong and predictive relationship between the extent of midazolam AUC change in humans and the various parameters calculated from both CYP3A4 mRNA and enzyme activity. The relationships exhibited with non-midazolam in vivo probes, in aggregate, were unsatisfactory. In general, the models yielded better fits when unbound rather than total plasma Cmax was used to calculate the induction parameters, as evidenced by higher R(2) and lower root mean square error (RMSE) and geometric mean fold error. With midazolam, the R3 cut-off value of 0.9, as suggested by US Food and Drug Administration guidance, effectively categorized strong inducers but was less effective in classifying midrange or weak inducers. This study supports the use of calibration curves generated from in vitro mRNA induction response curves to predict CYP3A4 induction potential in human. With the caveat that most compounds evaluated here were not strong inhibitors of enzyme activity, testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity was also demonstrated to be a strong predictor of CYP3A4 induction potential in this assay model.

Inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by omeprazole metabolites and their contribution to drug-drug interactions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of metabolites to drug-drug interactions (DDI) using the inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by omeprazole and its metabolites as a model. Of the metabolites identified in vivo, 5-hydroxyomeprazole, 5'-O-desmethylomeprazole, omeprazole sulfone, and carboxyomeprazole had a metabolite to parent area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(m)/AUC(p)) ratio ≥ 0.25 when either total or unbound concentrations were measured after a single 20-mg dose of omeprazole in a cocktail. All of the metabolites inhibited CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 reversibly. In addition omeprazole, omeprazole sulfone, and 5'-O-desmethylomeprazole were time dependent inhibitors (TDI) of CYP2C19, whereas omeprazole and 5'-O-desmethylomeprazole were found to be TDIs of CYP3A4. The in vitro inhibition constants and in vivo plasma concentrations were used to evaluate whether characterization of the metabolites affected DDI risk assessment. Identifying omeprazole as a TDI of both CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 was the most important factor in DDI risk assessment. Consideration of reversible inhibition by omeprazole and its metabolites would not identify DDI risk with CYP3A4, and with CYP2C19, reversible inhibition values would only identify DDI risk if the metabolites were included in the assessment. On the basis of inactivation data, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 inhibition by omeprazole would be sufficient to identify risk, but metabolites were predicted to contribute 30-63% to the in vivo hepatic interactions. Therefore, consideration of metabolites may be important in quantitative predictions of in vivo DDIs. The results of this study show that, although metabolites contribute to in vivo DDIs, their relative abundance in circulation or logP values do not predict their contribution to in vivo DDI risk.

Utility of DPX2 cells for predicting CYP3A induction-mediated drug-drug interactions and associated structure-activity relationships

The increase in cytochrome P450 (P450) enzyme activity noted upon exposure to therapeutics can elicit marked drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that may ultimately result in poor clinical outcome or adverse drug effects. As such, in vitro model systems that can rapidly and accurately determine whether potential therapeutics activate the human pregnane X receptor (PXR) and thus induce CYP3A P450 levels are highly sought after tools for drug discovery. To that end, we assessed whether DPX2 cells, a HepG2-derived cell line stably integrated with a PXR expression vector plus a luciferase reporter, could detect agents that not only cause PXR activation/CYP3A induction but also elicit clinical DDIs. All 20 clinical inducers and 9 of 15 clinical noninducers examined activated PXR in DPX2 cells (E(max) > 8-fold), although activation parameters obtained with the noninducers were not predictive of DDI. The relative induction score, calculated by combining PXR activation parameters (EC(50) and E(max)) in DPX2 cells for seven inducers plus four noninducers with their efficacious total plasma concentrations, strongly correlated (R(2) = 0.90) with the magnitude of induction of midazolam clearance. Thus, the DPX cell-based PXR activation system is not only capable of distinguishing potential inducers in a high-throughput manner but can also differentiate among compounds in predicting the magnitude of induction-mediated DDIs, providing a means for structure-activity relationship screening during discovery and development.

[Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors: should we worry about long-term exposure?]

Long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is becoming more prevalent. Although they are well tolerated in the short term, serious concerns about long-term use have arisen. Recent data suggest that the latter is associated with an increased risk for osteoporotic fracture (especially vertebral), Clostridium difficile infection and rebound acid hypersecretion after treatment discontinuation. Acute interstitial nephritis is rare but may progress to chronic renal failure. An increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia has not been established in the general population and seems limited to the most vulnerable patients. Consistent data are still missing to correctly assess the risk of iron deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency or hypomagnesaemia and the risk of digestive malignant diseases, despite the pathophysiological basis that exists concerning gastric malignancy. Many drug interactions can occur on long-term treatment, including some that imply the cytochrome P450 enzymes. Finally, the risk-benefit balance for a chronic PPI use in children seems unfavorable in most cases.

Are circulating metabolites important in drug-drug interactions?: Quantitative analysis of risk prediction and inhibitory potency

The potential of metabolites to contribute to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine the quantitative role of circulating metabolites in inhibitory DDIs in vivo. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) data related to at least one circulating metabolite was available for 71% of the 102 inhibitor drugs identified. Of the 80 metabolites characterized at steady state, 78% had AUCs >10% of that of the parent drug. A comparison of the inhibitor concentration/inhibition constant ([I]/K(i)) ratios of metabolites and the respective parent drugs showed that 17 of the 21 (80%) reversible inhibitors studied had metabolites that were likely to contribute to in vivo DDIs, with some metabolites predicted to have inhibitory effects greater than those of the parent drug. The in vivo drug interaction risks associated with amiodarone, bupropion, and sertraline could be identified from in vitro data only, when data pertaining to metabolites were included in the predictions. In conclusion, cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors often have circulating metabolites that contribute to clinically observed CYP inhibition.

Systematic review: impaired drug absorption related to the co-administration of antisecretory therapy

BACKGROUND

Due to suppression of gastric acidity during antisecretory therapy, an impaired absorption of co-administered drugs may occur.

AIM

To review evidence of impaired drug absorption related to the use of co-administered PPIs or H2RAs.

METHODS

Systematic search of MEDLINE/EMBASE/SCOPUS databases (1980-September 2008) for English articles with keywords: drug malabsorption and absorption, stomach, anti-secretory/acid inhibitory drugs, histamine H2 antagonists, PPIs, gastric acid, pH, hypochlorhydria, gastric hypoacidity. From 2126 retrieved articles, 16 randomized crossover studies were identified investigating impaired absorption of nine different drugs in association with co-administration of PPIs or H2RAs. Information on investigated drug, study type, features of investigated subjects, study design, type of intervention, and study results were extracted.

RESULTS

The identified studies investigated the absorption kinetics of nine drugs. Acid suppression reduced absorption of ketoconazole, itraconazole, atazanavir, cefpodoxime, enoxacin and dipyridamole (median C(max) reduction by 66.5%). An increased absorption of nifedipine and digoxin (median AUC increase by 10%) and a 2-fold-increase in alendronate bioavailability were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric pH appears relevant for absorption of some cardiovascular or infectious disease agents. Antisecretory treatment may significantly modify the absorption of co-administered drugs.

HepaRG cells as an in vitro model for evaluation of cytochrome P450 induction in humans

HepaRG is a highly differentiated cell line that displays several hepatocyte-like functions, including drug-metabolizing enzymes. In this study, the HepaRG cells were characterized and evaluated as an in vitro model to predict cytochrome P450 (P450) enzyme induction of drugs in humans. Exposure of HepaRG cells to prototypical inducers resulted in induction of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 mRNA, as well as phenacetin O-dealkylase, bupropion hydroxylase, diclofenac 4'-hydroxylase, and midazolam 1'-hydroxylase activities. The observed induction is consistent with the previously reported expression of the nuclear receptors pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor, which are necessary for a P450 induction response. To avoid problems with toxicity and solubility, the induction potency of test compounds was evaluated by calculating the concentrations leading to a 2-fold increase of baseline mRNA or enzyme activity levels (F(2) values) instead of EC(50) values from full dose-response curves. For CYP3A4 mRNA, the obtained F(2) values were related to the in vivo exposure [area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)] of the inducer (AUC/F(2)). This score was then correlated with the decrease in AUC for a CYP3A probe drug, administered before and after treatment with the inducing agent. By using this method an excellent correlation (R(2) = 0.863) was obtained, which implies that the degree of CYP3A induction in vivo can be predicted from CYP3A4 mRNA induction in HepaRG cells. The present study shows that HepaRG cells are a valuable model to be used for prediction of induction of drug-metabolizing P450 enzymes in vivo in humans.

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of paricalcitol in healthy subjects

Paricalcitol capsules are indicated for the prevention and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Proton pump inhibitors are prescribed to CKD patients to treat gastroesophageal reflux. This was a single dose, crossover study evaluating the effect of omeprazole, change in gastric pH as a result thereof, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of paricalcitol. Twenty-six healthy subjects were administered paricalcitol capsules (16 microg) alone (regimen A), and following a single dose of OMP (40 mg) (regimen B), with a washout of at least 7 days. Plasma samples for paricalcitol concentrations were collected for 48 h post-paricalcitol dose. The plasma paricalcitol concentrations were measured using an LC-MS/MS assay (LOQ=0.02 ng/ml) and paricalcitol pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. The point estimates and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-infinity to evaluate paricalcitol-omeprazole interaction were 1.032 [0.920-1.158] and 1.041 [0.951-1.139], respectively. No significant differences in Tmax (regimen A: 2.9 h vs regimen B: 2.6 h) or t1/2 (6.83 h vs 6.6 h) between the regimens were observed. Hence, the co-administration of omeprazole does not affect the PK of paricalcitol. Both regimens were well tolerated and no apparent differences among the regimens with respect to safety were observed.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors are used extensively for the treatment of gastric acid-related disorders because they produce a greater degree and longer duration of gastric acid suppression and, thus, better healing rates, than histamine H(2) receptor antagonists. The need for long-term treatment of these disorders raises the potential for clinically significant drug interactions in patients receiving proton pump inhibitors and other medications. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms for drug interactions in this setting. Proton pump inhibitors can modify the intragastric release of other drugs from their dosage forms by elevating pH (e.g. reducing the antifungal activity of ketoconazole). Proton pump inhibitors also influence drug absorption and metabolism by interacting with adenosine triphosphate-dependent P-glycoprotein (e.g. inhibiting digoxin efflux) or with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system (e.g. decreasing simvastatin metabolism), thereby affecting both intestinal first-pass metabolism and hepatic clearance. Although interactions based on the change of gastric pH are a group-specific effect and thus may occur with all proton pump inhibitors, individual proton pump inhibitors differ in their propensities to interact with other drugs and the extent to which their interaction profiles have been defined. The interaction profiles of omeprazole and pantoprazole have been studied most extensively. A number of studies have shown that omeprazole carries a considerable potential for drug interactions, since it has a high affinity for CYP2C19 and a somewhat lower affinity for CYP3A4. In contrast, pantoprazole appears to have lower potential for interactions with other medications. Although the interaction profiles of esomeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole have been less extensively investigated, evidence suggests that lansoprazole and rabeprazole seem to have a weaker potential for interactions than omeprazole. Although only a few drug interactions involving proton pump inhibitors have been shown to be of clinical significance, the potential for drug interactions should be taken into account when choosing a therapy for gastric acid-related disorders, especially for elderly patients in whom polypharmacy is common, or in those receiving a concomitant medication with a narrow therapeutic index.

Safety of potent gastric acid inhibition

The proton pump inhibitors are a very effective drug group for the control of gastric acid secretion, which makes them of great use in the medical practice setting, while at the same time they represent one of the treatment groups widely used in Western European countries. These factors lead to this drug group being prescribed in all age populations, quite often in polymedicated patients and with pluripathology, and on many occasions during prolonged periods of time. All these determinant factors sometimes make the safety profile of proton pump inhibitors disputable. In this respect all of them have been shown to have little adverse events and are safe in long-term treatment. The risk of drug interactions when prescribed in association with other drugs is low and their repercussion in the medical practice setting is quite exceptional as they require few dosage adjustments in patients with severe concomitant diseases and in elderly patients. Finally, their safety is high in pregnant women and in children, although further studies in this population are required to corroborate this evidence.

Pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors in children

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has become widespread in children and infants for the management of paediatric acid-related disease. Pharmacokinetic profiles of only omeprazole and lansoprazole have been well characterised in children over 2 years of age with acid-related diseases. Few data have been recently published regarding the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in children, and none are available for rabeprazole or esomeprazole. The metabolism of PPI enantiomers has never been studied in the paediatric population. A one-compartment model best describes the pharmacokinetic behaviour of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in children, with important interindividual variability for each pharmacokinetic parameter. Like adults, PPIs are rapidly absorbed in children following oral administration; the mean time to reach maximum plasma concentration varies from 1 to 3 hours. Since these agents are acid labile, their oral formulations consist of capsules containing enteric-coated granules. No liquid formulation is available for any of the PPIs. Thus, for those patients unable to swallow capsules, extemporaneous liquid preparations for omeprazole and lansoprazole have been reported; however, neither the absolute nor the relative bioavailabilities of these oral formulations have been studied in children. Intravenous formulations are available for omeprazole (in Europe), lansoprazole and pantoprazole. PPIs are rapidly metabolised in children, with short elimination half-lives of around 1 hour, similar to that reported for adults. All PPIs are extensively metabolised by the liver, primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, to inactive metabolites, with little unchanged drug excreted in the urine. Similar to that seen in adults, the absolute bioavailability of omeprazole increases with repeated dosing in children; this phenomenon is thought to be due to a combination of decreased first-pass elimination and reduced systemic clearance. The apparent clearance (CL/F) of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole appears to be faster for children than for adults. A higher metabolic capacity in children as well as differences in the extent of PPI bioavailability are most likely responsible for this finding. This may partly account for the need in children for variable and sometimes considerably greater doses of PPIs, on a per kilogram basis, than for adults to achieve similar plasma concentrations. Furthermore, no studies have been able to demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between age and pharmacokinetic parameters among children. Despite the small number of very young infants studied, there is some evidence for reduced PPI metabolism in newborns. The limited paediatric data regarding the impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on PPI metabolism are similar to those reported for adults, with poor metabolisers having 6- to 10-fold higher area under the concentration-time curve values compared with extensive metabolisers. Finally, because a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship exists for PPIs, the significant interindividual variability in their disposition may partly explain the wide range of therapeutic doses used in children. Further studies are needed to better define the pharmacokinetics of PPIs in children <2 years of age.

Effects of omeprazole or cola beverage on the pharmacokinetics of oral DA-8159, a new erectogenic, in rats

The changes in pharmacokinetics of DA-8159 by omeprazole with respect to inhibition of CYP3A1/2 in rats were evaluated. After oral administration of DA-8159 at dose of 30 mg/kg to rats pretreated with oral omeprazole at 30 mg/kg for 1 week, the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time infinity (AUC) of DA-8159 was significantly greater (37.5% increase) than that in control rats. This could be due to inhibition of metabolism of DA-8159 by inhibition of CYP3A1/2 by omeprazole. The AUC(DA-8164 (a metabolite of DA-8159))/AUC(DA-8159) ratio was also smaller (32.4% decrease) with omeprazole. After oral administration of DA-8159 at a dose of 30 mg/kg to rats without or with cola beverage, the pharmacokinetic parameters of DA-8159 and DA-8164 were not significantly different between two groups of rats. This suggested that cola beverage did not have any considerable effects on CYP3A1/2 in rats.

Impact of cotherapy with some proton pump inhibitors on medical claims among HMO patients already using other common drugs also cleared by cytochrome P450

Adverse drug event (ADE) rates resulting from coadministration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and other drugs with potential for interaction with PPIs (DPIs) are unknown. This retrospective study assesses the occurrence of such ADEs and their potential impact on medical care costs by reviewing integrated medical and pharmacy claims. Managed care patients receiving one or more DPIs were identified. Within this sample, those who were also prescribed omeprazole or lansoprazole (DPI + PPI) were included. A second cohort (DPI alone) was created, matching for age, gender, and DPI use. Rates of ADEs were followed for 6 months after entry. Among PPI users, 58% used one or more DPIs, whereas 7% of DPI subjects used a PPI. Among claims arising from ADEs occurring in more than 1% of patients, 14 occurred in the DPI + PPI group and 2 occurred in the DPI-alone cohort, respectively, a highly significant difference. Crude odds ratios for the risks of specific ADEs were significantly increased for cotherapy with a PPI and warfarin, clarithromycin, corticosteroids, carbamazepine, nifedipine, or diclofenac. After adjustment, the first three associations remained significant. Coprescription of a PPI with potentially interacting drugs was common in practice and associated with significantly increased claims for medical care.

Calcium-channel blockers and end-stage renal disease: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the different calcium-channel blockers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Calcium-channel blockers have been in use for some time in the end-stage renal disease population. Their primary use has been as antihypertensive and antianginal therapies. In this regard, they are effective agents. Recently, it has been noted that dialysis-related hypotension occurs less frequently in calcium-channel blocker treated patients. Also, access patency and overall patient survival are improved with calcium-channel blocker therapy.

SUMMARY

Calcium-channel blockers are useful agents for the control of hypertension in end-stage renal disease patients and appear to favorably influence survival in this population. Calcium-channel blockers are not dialyzable and their pharmacokinetics do not substantially change with renal failure therefore they do not require dose adjustment based on level of renal function. Too few studies exist to determine if individual calcium-channel blockers differ in their effects. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed in the end-stage renal disease population to better understand the role of calcium-channel blockers in the excess cardiovascular disease burden of this population.

Effect of omeprazole on oral and intravenous RS-methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the rat

The effect of omeprazole on oral and intravenous (iv) RS-methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was studied in awake, freely moving rats, which were divided in four groups: oral RS-methadone (3 mg/kg) was given (a) to a control group (CO(oral)) (n = 65) and (b) to an omeprazole pretreated group (OP(oral)) (n = 77), and iv RS-methadone (0.35 mg/kg) was administered (c) to a control group (CO(iv)) (n = 86) and (d) to an omeprazole pretreated group (OP(iv)) (n = 86). Omeprazole (2 mg/kg) was given iv 2 h before RS-methadone. Plasma concentrations of RS-methadone (Cp) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and analgesic response by tail flick for 0-180 min (oral) and 0-120 min (iv). RS-Methadone rate of absorption (mean +/- SE) was faster in OP(oral) (k(01) = 0.31 +/- 0.04 min(-1)) than in CO(oral) (k(01) = 0.05 +/- 0.007 min(-1)), consequently plasma peak concentrations (C(max)) were greater (197.41 +/- 33.70 ng/mL versus 83.54 +/- 7.97 ng/mL) and the time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was shorter (11.23 +/- 1.32 min versus 39.18 +/- 1.74 min). Mean area under the Cp-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) and hence bioavailability of oral RS-methadone were increased by omeprazole without significant changes in the elimination. Omeprazole did not affect the pharmacokinetics of iv RS-methadone. The changes of the analgesic effect of RS-methadone as a function of time were similar in all four groups. In the CO(oral) group, Cp and analgesic effect were defined by the E(max) model. The relationship between Cp and drug effect in the OP(oral) group showed a counterclockwise hysteresis (k(e0) of 0.018 +/- 0.006 min(-1)). For the iv groups (CO(iv) and OP(iv)), the Cp-analgesic effect relationship was described by an E(max) sigmoid model and omeprazole did not affect the pharmacodynamic parameters. It is concluded that omeprazole causes an increase in the bioavailability of oral RS-methadone without modifying the analgesic response but affecting the Cp-effect relationship.

Proton pump inhibitors and their drug interactions: an evidence-based approach

The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective antisecretory agents used to treat acid-related disorders. As such, they are frequently prescribed for patients who are concurrently using other medications. PPIs may interact with other drugs through numerous mechanisms. The most important include competitive inhibition of hepatic cytochrome P (CYP) 450 enzymes involved in drug metabolism, and alteration of the absorption of other drugs via changes in gastric pH levels. Poor metabolizers, who lack CYP2C19, may be particularly predisposed to drug interactions. Although the potential for drug interactions is high, few clinically significant interactions have been reported for the PPIs. Nevertheless, caution is indicated when certain drugs are co-prescribed with these agents. The incidence of clinically significant drug interactions increases proportionately with the number of drugs taken and with the age of the patient. The drug interaction with the greatest clinical importance is the reduction in benzodiazepine clearance by omeprazole.

Normal-phase TLC separation of enantiomers of 1.4-dihydropyridine derivatives

A new TLC-based method was proposed for the separation of enantiomers and mixtures of racemic DHP derivatives differing in the kind of substituent in the phenyl ring. The conditions for the effective determination of the substances involved and the mechanism of their sorption were also studied. For the separation of felodipine, nilvadipine, and isradipine enantiomers, thin-layer chromatography was used, with a chiral stationary phase of the ligand exchange type, and developing phases of a different concentration of methanol (phi) as an organic modifier. The retention coefficient values k' were used to make the plots log k' = f(log phi) and log k' = f(phi). The processes taking place in the chromatographic systems were shown to be described by the Snyder-Soczewiński equation.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

As Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in the aetiopathogenesis of peptic ulcer, therapeutic strategies aimed at maintaining long term remission have shifted from the control of intragastric pH to targeting H. pylori. According to recent international guidelines the clinical goals--rapid ulcer healing and prevention of relapse--can be best accomplished by combination therapy consisting of an antisecretory drug (proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine) and 2 antimicrobial agents (preferable amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole). When applying such multidrug regimens, possible synergy between the agents suggests that pharmacokinetic considerations might help to improve H. pylori eradication rates, which should be above 85 to 90% on an intention-to-treat basis. The present review summarises the pharmacokinetic properties and interaction potential of all drugs presently used in the various H. pylori eradication regimens, with emphasis on particular patient populations such as the elderly and those with renal impairment. The drugs considered are omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, ranitidine and ranitidine bismutrex, bismuth salts, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, roxithromycin, metronidazole, tinidazole and tetracycline. When addressing the clinically important questions of the efficacy, safety and costs of the recommended regimens, the impact of drug disposition on H. pylori eradication should not be neglected.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anti-ulcer drugs

The safety profile of any pharmacological agent is defined on the basis of its toxicity, tolerability and potential for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions with other compounds, which may belong to the same or to a different pharmacological class. Drug-drug interactions are important in clinical practice because short and long term therapeutic regimens frequently require coadministration of different drugs. The pharmacological treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers (and of related syndromes) includes older and newer compounds, which have different mechanisms of action and exert different therapeutic effects. These compounds are widely prescribed in combination with other drugs being given for the treatment of concomitant diseases. This article reviews pharmacokinetic interactions with anti-ulcer drugs, paying particular attention to those which have clinically relevant adverse effects. Drugs mentioned in the literature as causing any pharmacokinetic interaction with anti-ulcer compounds are considered in this article.

Drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors

Omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are all mainly metabolised by the polymorphically expressed cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform CYP2C19 (S-mephenytoin hydroxylase). All 3 proton pump inhibitors have a very limited potential for drug interactions at the CYP level. Small effects on CYP reported for these compounds are usually of no clinical relevance. No dose related adverse effects have been identified, suggesting that the small proportion of slow metabolisers is at no additional risk for clinically important drug interactions. The absorption of some compounds, e.g. benzylpenicillin (penicillin G), are altered during treatment with proton pump inhibitors as a result of the increased intragastric pH. A synergy has been confirmed between omeprazole and amoxicillin or clarithromycin in the antibacterial effect against Helicobacter pylori.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction after administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole with prednisone

In a recently reported case, administration of omeprazole, a "proton pump" inhibitor, was temporally associated with the clinical relapse of pemphigus in a 44-year-old woman whose condition had been stabilized with a fixed dose of prednisone, suggesting the possibility of a drug interaction. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone after a single dose of prednisone given during multi-dose administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole. Lansoprazole (30 mg), omeprazole (40 mg), or placebo was administered once daily under fasted conditions for 7 days to healthy male volunteers. On the seventh day, a single dose of prednisone (40 mg) was administered concomitantly with the study medication, and plasma prednisolone concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography for 24 hours thereafter. Two weeks separated the first doses of each study period. Eighteen volunteers entered the study; pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for 15 participants. Safety data were evaluable for 16 participants in the lansoprazole/prednisone group; 17 in the omeprazole/ prednisone group; and 17 in the placebo/prednisone group. The pharmacokinetic parameters for prednisolone, including the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax), terminal-phase half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve, were comparable for the three regimens. Adverse events (AEs) rated as possibly or probably drug related were reported by 50%, 24%, and 47% for subjects in the lansoprazole, omeprazole, and placebo treatment groups, respectively. Headache was the most common drug-related AE. No serious AEs were reported, and no subject withdrew from the study because of an AE. Concomitant administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole does not affect the absorption, biotransformation, or disposition of a single dose of prednisone. All three treatment regimens were well tolerated.

Differences between white subjects and Chinese subjects in the in vivo inhibition of cytochrome P450s 2C19, 2D6, and 3A by omeprazole

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of omeprazole on indexes of CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and 3A in vivo activity and to compare these in white subjects and Chinese subjects.

METHODS

Omeprazole, 40 mg/day, or placebo were administered in a double-blind crossover study for 3 weeks to eight healthy white and seven Chinese male extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin and debrisoquin. Debrisoquin (10 mg), dapsone (100 mg), and mephenytoin (100 mg) were given 1 week before administration, on the last day of administration, and 3 weeks after administration, and urine was collected over 8 hours. Phenotypic trait values were obtained from the urinary recoveries of the probe drugs or their metabolites.

RESULTS

In the white subjects, omeprazole significantly inhibited CYP2C19-mediated S-mephenytoin metabolism as indicated by decreases in the urinary R/S enantiomeric ratio (63% +/- 13%; p < 0.02; mean +/- SD) and the excretion of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin (39% +/- 13%; p < 0.001). Similar but smaller changes were also noted in Chinese subjects, 22% +/- 25% (p = 0.08) and 29% +/- 13% (p < 0.002), respectively. The interracial differences in the extent of inhibition of metabolism were statistically significant (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). In contrast, the debrisoquin urinary metabolic ratio, a measure of CYP2D6, was unaffected. The excretion of hydroxylamine dapsone-a putative probe of CYP3A activity-was reduced by 40% +/- 30% (p < 0.03) in white subjects but not in Chinese subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole selectively inhibits the in vivo metabolism of S-mephenytoin, consistent with the predictions based on in vitro studies. The extent of interaction is greater in subjects of white European ancestry. It is to be expected that similar situations would also occur when omeprazole is coadministered with other substrates of CYP2C19.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole

This review updates and evaluates the currently available information regarding the pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of the acid pump inhibitors omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole. Differences and similarities between the compounds are discussed. Omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are all mainly metabolished by the polymorphically expressed cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform S-mephenytoin hydroxylase (CYP2C19), which means that within a population a few individuals (3% of Caucasians) metabolise the compounds slowly compared with the majority of the population. For all 3 compounds, the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) for a slow metaboliser is, in general, approximately 5 times higher than that in an average patient. Since all 3 compounds are considered safe and well tolerated, and no dosage-related adverse drug reactions have been identified, this finding seems to be of no clinical relevance. The acid pump inhibitors seem to be similarly handled in the elderly, where a somewhat slower elimination can be demonstrated compared with young individuals. In patients with renal insufficiency, omeprazole is eliminated as in healthy individuals, whereas the data on lansoprazole and pantoprazole are unresolved. In patients with hepatic insufficiency, as expected, the elimination rates of all 3 compounds are substantially decreased. No clinically relevant effects on specific endogenous glandular functions, such as the adrenal (cortisol), the gonads or the thyroid, were demonstrated for omeprazole and pantoprazole, whereas a few minor concerns have been raised regarding lansoprazole. The absorption of some compounds, e.g. digoxin, might be altered as a result of the increased gastric pH obtained during treatment with acid pump inhibitors, and, accordingly, similar effects are expected irrespective of which acid pump inhibitor is given. The effect of the acid pump inhibitors on enzymes in the liver has been intensely debated, and some authors have claimed that lansoprazole and pantoprazole have less potential than omeprazole to interact with other drugs metabolised by CYP. However, after assessment of available data in this area, the conclusion is that all 3 acid pump inhibitors have a very limited potential for drug interactions at the CYP level. In addition, the small effects on CYP reported for these compounds are rarely of any clinical relevance, considering the normal intra- (and inter-)individual variations in metabolism observed for most drugs. In conclusion, omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are structurally very similar, and an evaluation of available data indicates that also with respect to pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions in general they demonstrate very similar properties, even though omeprazole has been more thoroughly studied with regard to different effects.

Lack of presystemic metabolism of nifedipine in the rabbit

In humans, oral bioavailability of nifedipine has been reported to be around 60%, although the organ(s) contributing to its first-pass metabolism have not been determined. The aim of this study was to determine in vivo, in anesthetized and conscious rabbits the role of the intestine, liver, and lungs in the first-pass metabolism of nifedipine. To assess the extraction of nifedipine by the intestine, liver, and lungs, nifedipine was administered before and after each organ, and serial blood samples were withdrawn from an artery. In conscious rabbits, the systemic clearance of nifedipine injected into a lateral vein of an ear was 14.6 +/- 1.6 ml/min per kg, a value that was slightly decreased by anesthesia. In anesthetized rabbits, compared to the clearance estimated when nifedipine was administered into the thoracic aorta, the administration of nifedipine into a jugular vein, into the portal vein, or into the portal vein, or into the duodenum did not increase the value of the systemic clearance. In conscious rabbits, the clearance of nifedipine estimated when the drug was administered into the duodenum, the peritoneum, the portal vein, or into the jugular vein was identical to the clearance calculated when the drug was injected into the thoracic aorta. In vitro, nifedipine was metabolized in liver and intestinal epithelial cells homogenates but not in lungs or kidneys. We concluded that in the rabbit, oral nifedipine is not subjected to a first-pass metabolism, even though the intestine and the liver may contribute to nifedipine systemic clearance.

Bunazosin in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function

Following a single oral dose of 6 mg bunazosin, a novel alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, the pharmacokinetics and blood pressure behaviour of 37 patients were studied. 12 subjects had normal renal and hepatic function (mean creatinine clearance (GFR) 107 +/- 240 ml/min, antipyrine clearance (AP Cl) 47 +/- 10.2 ml/min; x +/- SD), 13 subjects had impaired renal function (mean GFR 38 +/- 11.5 ml/min, AP Cl 39 +/- 4.0 ml/min), and 12 patients had liver cirrhosis which was confirmed by liver biopsy (mean AP Cl 18 +/- 9.2 ml/min, GFR 92 +/- 8.1 ml/min). The groups studied were matched for age and body weight. The area under the plasma level time curve (AUC0-infinity) of bunazosin increased from 96.6 +/- 48.7 micrograms.ml-1.h in the normals to 157.0 +/- 101.0 micrograms.ml-1.h in the liver patients and to 298.2 +/- 199.4 micrograms.ml-1.h in patients with impaired renal function (P < 0.05). As there was a close correlation between plasma levels and antihypertensive activity of bunazosin in the present study, dosage adjustment of the alpha 1-receptor blocker in patients with impaired liver and kidney function appears to be mandatory.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the nifedipine/co-dergocrine combination in impaired liver and renal function

Following a single oral dose of 20 mg nifedipine combined with 2 mg co-dergocrine to 24 subjects, the pharmacokinetics of this drug were studied. 8 normotensive subjects had normal renal and hepatic function, 8 patients had chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 30 ml.min-1) and 8 patients had liver cirrhosis which was confirmed by liver biopsy. The area under the plasma level time curve (AUC infinity) of co-dergocrine increased from 0.59 +/- 0.41 ng.ml-1. (mean +/- SD) in the normals to 1.24 +/- 0.95 ng.ml-1.h in liver cirrhosis (P less than 0.05) and to 1.81 +/- 0.9 ng.ml-1.h in renal failure (P less than 0.05 compared with the control group). Corresponding values for the nifedipine AUC infinity were 564.5 +/- 268 ng.ml-1.h, 1547.5 +/- 1134 (P less than 0.05) and 929 +/- 533 ng.ml-1.h (P less than 0.05; gas chromatographic method). The incidence of adverse effects was lower in patients with renal failure than in subjects with normal renal and liver function as well as in those with liver cirrhosis.