Localization of the human progesterone receptor gene to chromosome 11q22-q23

Unraveling the Dynamics of Estrogen and Progesterone Signaling in the Endometrium: An Overview

The endometrium is crucial for the perpetuation of human species. It is a complex and dynamic tissue lining the inner wall of the uterus, regulated throughout a woman's life based on estrogen and progesterone fluctuations. During each menstrual cycle, this multicellular tissue undergoes cyclical changes, including regeneration, differentiation in order to allow egg implantation and embryo development, or shedding of the functional layer in the absence of pregnancy. The biology of the endometrium relies on paracrine interactions between epithelial and stromal cells involving complex signaling pathways that are modulated by the variations of estrogen and progesterone levels across the menstrual cycle. Understanding the complexity of estrogen and progesterone receptor signaling will help elucidate the mechanisms underlying normal reproductive physiology and provide fundamental knowledge contributing to a better understanding of the consequences of hormonal imbalances on gynecological conditions and tumorigenesis. In this narrative review, we delve into the physiology of the endometrium, encompassing the complex signaling pathways of estrogen and progesterone.

Progesterone Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk

The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the association between polymorphisms in the progesterone receptor gene (PGR) and breast cancer risk. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed in November 2021. Study characteristics, minor allele frequencies, genotype frequencies, and odds ratios were extracted. Forty studies met the eligibility criteria and included 75 032 cases and 89 425 controls. Of the 84 PGR polymorphisms reported, 7 variants were associated with breast cancer risk in at least 1 study. These polymorphisms included an Alu insertion (intron 7) and rs1042838 (Val660Leu), also known as PROGINS. Other variants found to be associated with breast cancer risk included rs3740753 (Ser344Thr), rs10895068 (+331G/A), rs590688 (intron 2), rs1824128 (intron 3), and rs10895054 (intron 6). Increased risk of breast cancer was associated with rs1042838 (Val660Leu) in 2 studies, rs1824128 (intron 3) in 1 study, and rs10895054 (intron 6) in 1 study. The variant rs3740753 (Ser344Thr) was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer in 1 study. Mixed results were reported for rs590688 (intron 2), rs10895068 (+331G/A), and the Alu insertion. In a pooled analysis, the Alu insertion, rs1042838 (Val660Leu), rs3740753 (Ser344Thr), and rs10895068 (+331G/A) were not associated with breast cancer risk. Factors reported to contribute to differences in breast cancer risk associated with PGR polymorphisms included age, ethnicity, obesity, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use. PGR polymorphisms may have a small contribution to breast cancer risk in certain populations, but this is not conclusive with studies finding no association in larger, mixed populations.

Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches for Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

A silent monster, breast cancer, is a challenging medical task for researchers. Breast cancer is a leading cause of death in women with respect to other cancers. A case of breast cancer is diagnosed among women every 19 seconds, and every 74 seconds, a woman dies of breast cancer somewhere in the world. Several risk factors, such as genetic and environmental factors, favor breast cancer development. This review tends to provide deep insights regarding the genetics of breast cancer along with multiple diagnostic and therapeutic approaches as problem-solving negotiators to prevent the progression of breast cancer. This assembled data mainly aims to discuss omics-based approaches to provide enthralling diagnostic biomarkers and emerging novel therapies to combat breast cancer. This review article intends to pave a new path for the discovery of effective treatment options.

Progesterone receptors in normal breast development and breast cancer

Progesterone receptors (PR) play a pivotal role in many female reproductive tissues such as the uterus, the ovary, and the mammary gland (MG). Moreover, PR play a key role in breast cancer growth and progression. This has led to the development and study of different progestins and antiprogestins, many of which are currently being tested in clinical trials for cancer treatment. Recent reviews have addressed the role of PR in MG development, carcinogenesis, and breast cancer growth. Thus, in this review, in addition to making an overview on PR action in normal and tumor breast, the focus has been put on highlighting the still unresolved topics on hormone treatment involving PR isoforms and breast cancer prognosis.

Reviewing the role of progesterone therapy in endometriosis

Endometriosis is a benign, chronic inflammatory condition characterized by the presence and growth of endometrial implants outside the uterine cavity. The cause of endometriosis is multifactorial. It is due to the diversity of hypothesis and plausibility of hormonal alterations which could play a major role. Evidence has shown that progesterone resistance is a key factor for endometriosis sufferers. Medical therapy can avoid surgical intervention, which may lead to a reduced in ovarian reserve, and its effects of earlier menopause and reduced fecundity. Progesterone receptor isoform has provided new insight as the potential treatment. Progestin, anti-progestin and selective progesterone receptor modulators usage, which target these receptors, could avoid hypo-estrogenic side effects, which can be debilitating. Numerous types of these medications have been used on and off labeled to treat endometriosis with varying success. This review aims to consolidate series of clinical trials using progestins in endometriosis.

No association between the progesterone receptor gene polymorphism (+331G/a) and the risk of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many published studies have estimated the association between the +331G/A (rs10895068) polymorphism in the progesterone receptor (PgR) gene and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain inconsistent and controversial. To address this inconsistency, we systematically interrogated the aforementioned association via a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Through a literature search, we identified 13 case-control studies, including 12,453 cases and 14,056 case-free controls. The strengths of reported associations were evaluated using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

An association was found between +331G/A polymorphism and +331G/A risk in the dominant model (p = 0.027). Via subgroup analysis, we found no association between +331G/A and breast cancer risk in Caucasians, Asians or mixed racial groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Through meta-analysis, we were able to gain insight into previously reported associations between +331G/A polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, further studies are still needed to provide more evidence.

Minireview: Progesterone Regulation of Proliferation in the Normal Human Breast and in Breast Cancer: A Tale of Two Scenarios?

Progesterone (P), which signals through the P receptor (PR), is critical in normal development of the breast, but its signaling axis is also a major driver of breast cancer risk. Here we review recent advances in the understanding of P signaling in the normal human breast, with a focus on the importance of the balance between autocrine and paracrine signaling. To date, most data (which derive largely from mouse models or human breast cancer cell line studies) have demonstrated that the vast majority of PR+ cells appear to act as "sensor" cells, which respond to P stimulation by translating these hormonal cues into paracrine signals. However, growing evidence suggests that, dependent on the cellular context, P may also signal in an autocrine manner in a subset of cells in the normal mouse mammary gland and human breast. It has been suggested that it may be dysregulation of this autocrine signaling, resulting in a "switch" from a predominance of paracrine signaling to autocrine signaling in PR+ cells, which is an early event during breast tumorigenesis. This review summarizes current evidence in the literature that demonstrates the mechanisms through which P acts in the normal human breast, as well as highlighting the important questions that remain unanswered.

Polymorphisms of progesterone receptor and ovarian cancer risk: a systemic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Growing bodies of studies have investigated the associations between three progesterone receptor (PGR) polymorphisms, +331G/A, Alu insertion and Val660Leu, and susceptibility to ovarian cancer, but the results remain controversial and inconclusive. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the associations.

METHODS

A total of 21 case-control studies from 16 publications that included analyses of Alu insertion (981 cases, 2136 controls), Val660Leu (2205 cases, 3222 controls) and +331G/A (2842 cases, 4305 controls) polymorphisms were identified.

RESULTS

Significantly increased risks of ovarian cancer were found for Alu insertion (T2 T2  + T1 T2 vs T1 T1 ; odds ratio [OR], 1.504; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.206-2.203) and Val660Leu (TT vs GT; OR, 1.524; 95% CI, 1.013-2.293). No significant association was found between +331G/A polymorphism and ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that the two polymorphisms of PGR, Alu insertion and Val660Leu, may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility as low-penetrance risk factors.

Analyze association of the progesterone receptor gene polymorphism PROGINS with ovarian cancer risk

Results conflict on the association between progesterone receptor gene (PRG) polymorphism PROGINS and ovarian cancer risk, despite wide-ranging investigations. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of 4,285 ovarian cancer cases and 6,257 controls from 11 published case-control studies. The strength of association between PROGINS polymorphism and ovarian cancer susceptibility was assessed using pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The results suggest no significant associations exist between PROGINS polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (T2T2 vs. T1T1: OR = 1.37, 95 % CI = 0.89-2.12, P = 0.15; T1T2 vs. T1T1:OR = 1.09, 95 % CI = 0.88-1.35, P = 0.41; T1T2 + T2T2 vs. T1T1:OR = 1.15, 95 % CI = 0.94-1.40, P = 0.17; T2T2 vs. T1 T1 + T1T2:OR = 1.34, 95 % CI = 0.87-2.07, P = 0.18). In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the PRG polymorphism PROGINS is not associated with ovarian cancer risk when multiple ethnic groups or regions were considered overall.

Prevalence of ERα-397 PvuII C/T, ERα-351 XbaI A/G and PGR PROGINS polymorphisms in Brazilian breast cancer-unaffected women

Polymorphisms of hormone receptor genes have been linked to modifications in reproductive factors and to an increased risk of breast cancer (BC). In the present study, we have determined the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the ERα-397 PvuII C/T, ERα-351 XbaI A/G and PGR PROGINS polymorphisms and investigated their relationship with mammographic density, body mass index (BMI) and other risk factors for BC. A consecutive and unselected sample of 750 Brazilian BC-unaffected women enrolled in a mammography screening program was recruited. The distribution of PGR PROGINS genotypic frequencies was 72.5, 25.5 and 2.0% for A1A1, A1A2 and A2A2, respectively, which was equivalent to that encountered in other studies with healthy women. The distribution of ERα genotypes was: ERα-397 PvuII C/T: 32.3% TT, 47.5% TC, and 20.2% CC; ERα-351 XbaI A/G: 46.3% AA, 41.7% AG and 12.0% GG. ERα haplotypes were 53.5% PX, 14.3% Px, 0.3% pX, and 32.0% px. These were significantly different from most previously published reports worldwide (P < 0.05). Overall, the PGR PROGINS genotypes A2A2 and A1A2 were associated with fatty and moderately fatty breast tissue. The same genotypes were also associated with a high BMI in postmenopausal women. In addition, the ERα-351 XbaI GG genotype was associated with menarche ≥12 years (P = 0.02). ERα and PGR polymorphisms have a phenotypic effect and may play an important role in BC risk determination. Finally, if confirmed in BC patients, these associations could have important implications for mammographic screening and strategies and may be helpful to identify women at higher risk for the disease.

Progesterone receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of endometriosis: results from an international collaborative effort

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between self-reported endometriosis and the putative functional promoter +331C/T single nucleotide polymorphism and the PROGINS allele.

DESIGN

Control subjects from ovarian cancer case-control studies participating in the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The majority of controls are drawn from population-based studies.

SETTING

An international ovarian cancer consortium including studies from Australia, Europe, and the United States.

PATIENT(S)

Five thousand eight hundred twelve white female controls, of whom 348 had endometriosis, from eight ovarian cancer case-control studies.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Genotypes for the +331C/T single nucleotide polymorphism and PROGINS allele and a history of endometriosis.

RESULT(S)

The occurrence of endometriosis was reduced in women carrying one or more copies of the +331 T allele (odds ratio=0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.98), whereas there was no association between the PROGINS allele and endometriosis (odds ratio=0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.16).

CONCLUSION(S)

Additional studies of the +331C/T variant are warranted given the current finding and the equivocal results of previous studies. The +331 T allele has been shown to result in a reduced progesterone (P) receptor A to P receptor B ratio, and if the observed association with endometriosis is confirmed it would suggest that this ratio is important for this disease.

Role of progesterone receptor polymorphisms in the recurrent spontaneous abortions: Indian case

Background

We attempt to ascertain if the 3 linked single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the Progesterone Receptor (PR) gene (exon 1: G 1031 C; S344T, exon 4: G 1978 T; L660V and exon 5: C 2310 T; H770H) and the PROGINS insertion in the intron G, between exons 7 and 8, are associated with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion (RSA) in the Indian population.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A total of 143 women with RSA and 150 controls were sequenced for all the 8 exons looking for the above 3 linked SNPs of the PR gene earlier implicated in the RSA, as well as for any new SNPs that may be possibly found in the Indian population. PROGINS insertion was screened by electrophoresis. We did not find any new mutations, not observed earlier, in our population. Further, we did not find significant role of the *2 allele (representing the mutant allele at the three SNP loci) or the T2 allele (PROGINS insertion) in the manifestation of RSA. We also did not find an LD pattern between each of the 3 SNPs and the PROGINS insertion.

Conclusions/Significance

The results suggest that the PR gene mutations may not play any exclusive role in the manifestation of RSA, and instead, given significantly higher frequency of the *2 allele among the normal women, we surmise if it does not really confer a protective role among the Indian populations, albeit further studies are required in the heterogeneous populations of this region before making any conclusive statement.

A prospective study of androgen levels, hormone-related genes and risk of rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is more common in females than males and sex steroid hormones may in part explain this difference. We conducted a case–control study nested within two prospective studies to determine the associations between plasma steroid hormones measured prior to RA onset and polymorphisms in the androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2), aromatase (CYP19) and progesterone receptor (PGR) genes and RA risk.

Methods

We genotyped AR, ESR2, CYP19, PGR SNPs and the AR CAG repeat in RA case–control studies nested within the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHS II (449 RA cases, 449 controls) and the Women's Health Study (72 cases, and 202 controls). All controls were matched on cohort, age, Caucasian race, menopausal status, and postmenopausal hormone use. We measured plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), testosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin in 132 pre-RA samples and 396 matched controls in the NHS cohorts. We used conditional logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders to assess RA risk.

Results

Mean age of RA diagnosis was 55 years in both cohorts; 58% of cases were rheumatoid factor positive at diagnosis. There was no significant association between plasma DHEAS, total testosterone, or calculated free testosterone and risk of future RA. There was no association between individual variants or haplotypes in any of the genes and RA or seropositive RA, nor any association for the AR CAG repeat.

Conclusions

Steroid hormone levels measured at a single time point prior to RA onset were not associated with RA risk in this study. Our findings do not suggest that androgens or the AR, ESR2, PGR, and CYP19 genes are important to RA risk in women.

Histone deacetylase inhibitor induced modulation of anti-estrogen therapy

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are a novel class of anti-tumor agents with a potential role in the treatment of breast cancer. In ER-positive cells, treatment with selective and non-selective HDAC inhibitors has been associated with a transcriptional down-regulation (and possibly protein modification via the HSP90 chaperone function) of ER and its response genes. In ER-negative cell lines, HDAC inhibitors have been shown to re-establish ER expression. In addition, HDAC inhibitors have been reported to modulate the progesterone receptor. Despite the opposing effects in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells, the addition of an HDAC inhibitor potentiated and restored the efficacy of anti-estrogen therapy in preclinical models. This has led to the initiation of several clinical trials combining HDAC inhibitors with anti-estrogen therapy. In this review, we will summarize the relationship between estrogen signaling and HDACs, examine how HDAC inhibitors impact this relationship and synergize with anti-estrogens to inhibit tumor growth, and discuss the clinical possibilities and potential of this new approach.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the progesterone receptor gene and association with uterine leiomyoma tumor characteristics and disease risk

OBJECTIVE

Uterine benign leiomyomas result from proliferation of a single smooth-muscle cell and their growth is affected by steroid hormones via steroid hormone receptors. This investigation analyzed the +331G/A and the V600L single nucleotide polymorphisms in the progesterone receptor, and correlated their incidence with clinical and tumor parameters as well as disease risk.

STUDY DESIGN

Peripheral blood DNA was analyzed for the frequency of both progesterone receptor single nucleotide polymorphisms in 270 women with uterine leiomyomas compared with 163 control women without uterine leiomyomas.

RESULTS

No correlation was found for both single nucleotide polymorphisms or the risk for developing myoma; however, statistical significant associations were found for single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes with specific clinical and tumor characteristics, eg, endometriosis, number of live births, menstrual cycle disorder, and leiomyoma focality.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support that specific genotypes in the progesterone receptor may be involved in tumor growth and metastasis but not in tumor initiation.

Gene products of chromosome 11q and their association with CCND1 gene amplification and tamoxifen resistance in premenopausal breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The amplification event occurring at chromosome locus 11q13, reported in several different cancers, includes a number of potential oncogenes. We have previously reported amplification of one such oncogene, namely CCND1, to be correlated with an adverse effect of tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Over-expression of cyclin D1 protein, however, confers tamoxifen resistance but not a tamoxifen-induced adverse effect. Potentially, co-amplification of an additional 11q13 gene, with a resulting protein over-expression, is required to cause an agonistic effect. Moreover, during 11q13 amplification a deletion of the distal 11q region has been described. In order to assess the potential impact of the deletion we examined a selected marker for this event.

METHOD

Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis was employed to identify and confirm changes in the gene expression of a number of different genes mapping to the 11q chromosomal region, associated with CCND1 amplification. The subsequent protein expression of these candidate genes was then examined in a clinical material of 500 primary breast cancers from premenopausal patients who were randomly assigned to either tamoxifen or no adjuvant treatment. The protein expression was also compared with gene expression data in a subset of 56 breast cancer samples.

RESULTS

Cortactin and FADD (Fas-associated death domain) over-expression was linked to CCND1 amplification, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, but was not associated with a diminished effect of tamoxifen. However, deletion of distal chromosome 11q, defined as downregulation of the marker Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1), was associated with an impaired tamoxifen response, and interestingly with low proliferative breast cancer of low grade. For Pak1 (p21-activated kinase 1) and cyclin D1 the protein expression corresponded to the gene expression data.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that many 11q13 associated gene products are over-expressed in conjunction with cyclin D1 but not linked to an agonistic effect of tamoxifen. Finally, the deletion of distal 11q, linked to 11q13 amplification, might be an important event affecting breast cancer outcome and tamoxifen response.

Progesterone receptor (PROGINS) polymorphism and the risk of ovarian cancer

The present case-control study evaluates the role of the progesterone receptor (PR) polymorphism known as PROGINS as a risk factor for ovarian cancer development and investigates the association between these genetic variants and clinical/pathologic variables of ovarian cancer. PROGINS polymorphism was examined, by polymerase chain reaction, in a total of 80 patients with ovarian cancer and 282 control subjects. The frequencies of PROGINS polymorphism T1/T1, T1/T2, and T2/T2 were 71.3, 15.0 and 13.8% in ovarian cancer patients and 78.37, 21.63 and 0% in controls, respectively. The chi(2)-test showed a higher incidence of the T2/T2 genotype (P=0.001) in the ovarian cancer group. In addition, women carrying a mutated allele (T2) showed approximately 2.2 times higher risk of ovarian cancer development as compared to women who have a variant allele (odds ratio (OR)=2.2; 95% CI=1.80-3.54). Regarding the clinical and pathologic findings observed within the cancer group, there was a significant correlation between PROGINS polymorphism and patients with a familial history (chi(2)=6.776; P=0.009; Fischer exact test, P=0.01). In this regard, patients with familial antecedents have a 4.7 times higher likelihood to have at least one risk allele (T2) as compared with patients without familial antecedents (OR=4.69; 95% CI=1.38-15.87). No correlations were observed among the other variables. These data suggest that the PROGINS polymorphism T2/T2 genotype might be associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

Hormone receptor-related gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in North Indian population

The purpose of this study was to analyse the frequency and type of mutations in the coding region of androgen receptor (AR) and to determine the role of polymorphisms in the intron 1 of ERalpha, exon 5 of ERbeta, intron 7 of progesterone, exon 7 of the aromatase (CYP19) and exon 9 of VDR genes in the risk of prostate cancer. PCR-RFLP analysis of all above the genes was on 100 prostate cancer patients and an equal number of matching controls. The study also included PCR-SSCP analyses of exons 2-8 of AR gene. The genotype containing -/- allele of ERalpha gene was statistically significant for the risk of prostate cancer pose (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.08-6.70, P = 0.032) Rr genotype of ERbeta gene also have a higher risk (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.52-5.23) for prostate cancer. The Cys allele of CYP19 gene was also associated with statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer (OR; 2.28, 95% CI, 1.20-4.35, P = 0.012). tt genotype of codon 352 of VDR gene showed an OR of 0.43 for (95% CI, 0.13-1.39) and an OR for Tt genotype was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.36-1.16). Taken together, the results showed that in North Indian population, ERalpha and CYP19 genes may be playing a role in the risk of prostate cancer.

Effects of low-dose tamoxifen on breast cancer biomarkers Ki-67, estrogen and progesterone receptors

Breast carcinoma is the most common malignancy among women and it has a major impact on mortality. Studies of primary chemoprevention with tamoxifen have generated high expectations and considerable success rates. The efficacy of lower doses of tamoxifen is similar to that seen with a standard dose of the drug, and there has been a reduction in healthcare costs and side effects.

The immune reaction to monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (MIB-1) and the expression of estrogen receptors (1D5) and progesterone receptors (PgR 636) in breast carcinoma were studied in patients treated with 10 mg of tamoxifen for a period of 14 days.

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted with 38 patients divided into two groups: Group A: N = 20 (control group-without medication) and Group B: N = 18 (tamoxifen/10 mg/day for 14 days). All patients signed an informed consent term previously approved by both institutions. Patients underwent incisional biopsy before treatment and 14 days later a tumor tissue sample was obtained during surgical treatment. Positivity was quantitatively assessed, counting at least 1.000 cells per slide. For statistical data analysis, a Wilcoxon non-parametric test was used, and α was set at 5%.

Both groups (A and B) were considered homogeneous regarding control variables. In Group A (control), there was no statistically significant reduction in Ki-67 (MIB-1) (p = 0.627), estrogen receptor (1D5) (p = 0.296) and progesterone receptor positivity (PgR 636) (p = 0.381).

In Group B (tamoxifen 10 mg/day), the mean percentage of nuclei stained by Ki-67 (MIB-1) was 24.69% before and 10.43% after tamoxifen treatment. Mean percentage of nuclei stained by estrogen receptor (1D5) was 59.53% before and 25.99% after tamoxifen treatment. Mean percentage of nuclei stained by progesterone receptor (PgR 636), was 59.34 before and 29.59% after tamoxifen treatment. A statistically significant reduction was found with the three markers (p < 0.001).

Tamoxifen significantly reduced monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (MIB-1), estrogen receptor (1D5) and progesterone receptor positivity (PgR 636) in the breast epithelium of carcinoma patients treated with a 10 mg dose of tamoxifen for 14 days.

Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy

The response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers respond less well to selective ER modulator (SERM) therapy than ER-positive/PR-positive tumors. The predictive value of PR has long been attributed to the dependence of PR expression on ER activity, with the absence of PR reflecting a nonfunctional ER and resistance to hormonal therapy. However, recent clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers may be specifically resistant to SERMs, whereas they may be less resistant to estrogen withdrawal therapy with aromatase inhibitors, which is a result inconsistent with the nonfunctional ER theory. Novel alternative molecular mechanisms potentially explaining SERM resistance in ER-positive/PR-negative tumors have been suggested by recent experimental indications that growth factors may downregulate PR levels. Thus, the absence of PR may not simply indicate a lack of ER activity, but rather may reflect hyperactive cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways that downregulate PR even as they activate other ER functions. Therefore, ER-positive/PR-negative breast tumors might best be treated by completely blocking ER action via estrogen withdrawal with aromatase inhibitors, by targeted ER degradation, or by combined therapy targeting both ER and growth factor signaling pathways. In this review, we will discuss the biology and etiology of ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancer, highlighting recent data on molecular cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways and demonstrating how PR might be a useful marker of these activities. Finally, we will consider the clinical implications of these observations.

Endocrine responsiveness: understanding how progesterone receptor can be used to select endocrine therapy

The receptor for the female hormone progesterone (PR), like that for estrogen (ER), is an important predictive marker for response to endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. PR exists as two isoforms, A and B. PR is important in mammary gland development and excess production of PRB is associated with breast cancer risk. Overabundance of PRA is related to resistance to tamoxifen. Total loss of PR is linked to reduced benefit from tamoxifen in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. The predictive significance of PR expression was originally explained on the basis that PR is an ER-regulated gene and its presence indicates a functioning ER pathway and, therefore, an endocrine-responsive tumor. More recent data, however, suggest an alternative explanation. While many studies show that loss of PR predicts relative resistance to the antiestrogen tamoxifen, a recent study suggests that PR loss may not indicate resistance to aromatase inhibition. The finding that PR loss may not correlate with resistance to aromatase inhibition may be related to crosstalk between ER and PR and growth factor receptor pathways such as HER2. PR loss in some tumors is due to excessive growth factor receptor signaling (overexpression of HER2), which downregulates expression of the PR gene. Neoadjuvant studies also show that HER2 signaling is associated with tamoxifen resistance, but not resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Therefore, high HER2 signaling could explain both PR loss and resistance to tamoxifen while the response to aromatase inhibitors is maintained. In this way, PR loss in some tumors may be a surrogate marker for increased signaling through the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase pathway and it may help clinicians decide between initial use of an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen in the individual patient.

PROGINS Alu sequence insertion is associated with hyperprolactinaemia but not leiomyoma susceptibility

OBJECTIVE

Leiomyoma and hyperprolactinaemia are both progesterone-dependent diseases. Hormone-related genes, such as the progesterone receptor (PGR), might be involved in their pathogenesis.

DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS

Subjects were divided into three groups: (i) leiomyoma (n = 120); (ii) hyperprolactinaemia (n = 101); (iii) normal controls (n = 140). We investigated the Alu (306-bp DNA) insertion in intron G of the PGR gene in all individuals. PGR gene polymorphisms [T1 (wild-type); T2 (PROGINS, with Alu insertion)] were determined by PCR and electrophoresis. Genotype and allele frequencies of the PROGINS in each group were detected and compared.

RESULTS

We observed no significant difference of the PGR*T1/T2 genotypes and allele frequencies between leiomyoma and other two groups. The proportions of T1 homozygote/heterozygote/T2 homozygote in each group were (i) 90/8.3/1.7%; (ii) 84.2/9.9/5.9%; (iii) 92.9/6.4/0.7%. In contrast, a higher percentage of T2-related genotype and allele were noted in hyperprolactinaemic women compared to other two groups. The proportions of T1/T2 alleles in each group were: (i) 94.2/5.8%; (ii) 89.1/10.9%; (iii) 96.1/3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROGIN*T2-related genotype and allele are related to a higher susceptibility to hyperprolactinaemia. The PROGINS polymorphism is not associated with leiomyoma development.

Estrogen receptor 2 and progesterone receptor gene polymorphisms and lipid levels in women with different hormonal status

Sex steroid hormones have multiple effects on lipid metabolism. We investigated the association between two common single nucleotide polymorphisms of the estrogen receptor 2 gene (ESR2), 1082G>A and 1730A>G, and PROGINS polymorphism of the progesterone receptor gene (PGR) with lipoprotein levels in a cross-sectional study with 472 women of European descent. The women were classified into three subgroups according to hormonal status, premenopausal women (n=187; mean age=34+/-9.7 years), postmenopausal women exposed to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (n=118; 56+/-6.7 years) and postmenopausal women unexposed to HRT (n=167; 58+/-9.8 years). The premenopausal and postmenopausal women exposed to HRT, both carriers of G/A genotype, exhibited LDL-C (P=0.027 and 0.001, respectively) and T-chol levels (P=0.035 and 0.001, respectively) lower than carriers of G/G genotype. This association was not observed in postmenopausal women unexposed to HRT. These results suggest that ESR2 1082G>A genotype may influence LDL-C levels in women with abundant estrogen levels, due to either endogenous or exogenous sources.

Association of progesterone receptor polymorphism with recurrent abortions

OBJECTIVE

The current study sought for polymorphisms within the progesterone receptor (PR) gene. Allele and genotype frequencies of patients with repeated abortions were compared to a control group.

DESIGN

All exons of the PR of 42 women with repeated abortions and 40 controls were screened for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). Determination of the DNA-sequences was performed.

RESULTS

Three SNPs were detected (exon 1: G1031C Ser344Thr; exon 4: G1978T Leu660Val, exon 5: C2310T His770His). These SNPs are linked. The more frequent wildtype (*1) allele and the rarer (*2) allele were found in the control group and in the study group at different frequencies (control group: *1/*1: 78%, *1/*2: 22%, *2/*2: 0%; patient group: *1/*1: 50%, *1/*2: 43%, *2/*2: 7%). The genotypes distributions differed significantly from each other (P=0.019, chi2=7.879).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the rarer PR allele may be associated with an increased likelihood of repeated miscarriages contributing to its multi-factorial causes.

Cloning and expression of a novel, truncated, progesterone receptor

Progesterone acts via two specific receptors to affect gene transcription in target tissues. Progesterone receptor (PR) B contains 933 amino acids while PR A is a truncated version lacking the initial 164 amino acids. We have cloned a novel, truncated PR from both human adipose and aortic cDNA libraries. This cDNA encodes a predicted protein of 314 amino acids, termed PR-M. Initiation of transcription of PR-M occurs in intron 3, with the initial exon identical to exon 4 of the genomic PRs, except for a novel 16 amino acid amino-terminal sequence, consistent with a signal peptide. The remainder of PR-M is identical to the genomic PR. Transcript for this protein was identified by RT-PCR in human aortic endothelial cells and T47D breast cancer cells. Expression of PR-M in Sf 9 insect cells results in a 38-kDa protein, demonstrated in human aortic endothelial cells and T47D breast cancer cells. The function of PR-M remains to be determined. The presence of a signal peptide and the lack of a DNA binding region suggests a non-genomic action.

PROGINS Alu insertion and human genomic diversity

A polymorphic Alu element belonging to the young Ya5 subfamily of Alu repeats located in the progesterone receptor gene has been characterized. Using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay, the genetic diversity associated with the PROGINS Alu repeat was determined in a diverse array of human populations. The level of insertion polymorphism associated with PROGINS suggests that it will be a useful marker for the study of human evolution. In addition, we determined the distribution of the PROGINS Alu insertion in two groups of women from greater New Orleans, LA with breast cancer. The PROGINS Alu insertion was not associated with breast cancer in the populations tested.

Genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 involved in breast cancer susceptibility

This review focuses on genes other than the high penetrance genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 that are involved in breast cancer susceptibility. The goal of this review is the discovery of polymorphisms that are either associated with breast cancer or that are in strong linkage disequilibrium with breast cancer causing variants. An association with breast cancer at a 5% significance level was found for 13 polymorphisms in 10 genes described in more than one breast cancer study. Our data will help focus on the further analysis of genetic polymorphisms in populations of appropriate size, and especially on the combinations of such polymorphisms. This will facilitate determination of population attributable risks, understanding of gene-gene interactions, and improving estimates of genetic cancer risks.

Human progesterone receptor gene polymorphism PROGINS and risk for breast cancer in Austrian women

A germline TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphism in the intron G of the progesterone receptor (PR) gene designated PROGINS was described to be associated with an increased risk for ovarian carcinoma. It was supposed that the PR isoform A protein associated with PROGINS has an increased stability and therefore, a higher transcriptional activity. This may cause an inadequate control of estrogen receptor (ER) and PR B isoform and lead to the increased risk of tumor development. On the other hand, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the chromosomal region 11q22-23, where the PR gene is located, was frequently observed in breast cancer, suggesting the presence of a tumor suppressor gene in this region. Recently, it was reported that PROGINS is associated with a decreased risk for breast cancer. In order to examine if PROGINS is associated with an alteration of the risk for breast cancer, we examined PROGINS in 155 sporadic breast cancer patients in Austrian women and in a control group of 106 healthy volunteers. LOH affecting the PR gene was also analyzed in the tumor patients. No statistically significant difference was found for the frequencies of the PROGINS carriers (23.2%) in the Austrian breast cancer patients and in the healthy control group (26.4%), indicating that PROGINS is not associated with either an increased or a decreased risk for breast cancer. Furthermore, no associations between the PROGINS status and the protein levels of ER and PR, clinical data like tumor type, differentiation grade, tumor size, and the nodal status as well as the age of the patients were found. There was also no significant difference in the frequency of LOH affecting the PR gene in the PROGINS carriers and non carriers, demonstrating that LOH at PR gene is not associated with the PROGINS status.

PROGINS receptor gene polymorphism is associated with endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between the 306-base pair insertion polymorphism in intron G of the progesterone receptor (PROGINS) and endometriosis.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENT(S)

Ninety-five white women with surgically diagnosed and histologically confirmed endometriosis and 107 white women without endometriosis (controls).

INTERVENTION(S)

Determination of PROGINS was performed by polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis. MAIN OUTCOIME MEASURE(S): Frequency and distribution of the PROGINS allele.

RESULT(S)

Frequencies of the mutant allele T2 was 0.17 among women with endometriosis and 0.08 among controls (odds ratio, 2.41 [CI, 1.31-4.53]). Homozygosity for allele T2 was present in 3.2% of women with endometriosis and 0.9% of controls.

CONCLUSION(S)

PROGINS appears to be associated with endometriosis in white persons.

Analysis of the human progesterone receptor gene polymorphism progins in Austrian ovarian carcinoma patients

Ovarian carcinoma is the highest death cause in gynecologic malignancies. Although the molecular basis for familial breast and ovarian cancer is elucidated, few genetic markers have been associated with sporadic ovarian carcinoma. A polymorphism in intron G of the human progesterone receptor (PgR), caused by an Alu insertion, was described to be associated with ovarian carcinoma in a pooled German/Irish population. Later on, a G to T substitution in exon 4, causing a Valine to Leucine change in the hinge region of the receptor, and a synonymous C to T substitution in exon 5 were reported to be linked to the Alu insertion. This complex of the PgR gene polymorphism was designated PROGINS. In order to investigate if PROGINS is associated with risk for ovarian cancer in Austrian women, we analyzed DNA from 226 Austrian patients with sporadic ovarian carcinoma and a control group with 194 healthy volunteers for the PROGINS complex. The PROGINS status was studied in association with risk for ovarian carcinoma, the age of the ovarian patients, the protein level of PgR and estrogen receptor (ER) and histopathological parameters. The results indicate that the frequency of PROGINS carriers in Austrian women is similar to those in women in North America and England. There is no significant difference between the PROGINS allele distribution in ovarian carcinoma patients and healthy women. The PROGINS is not associated with increased risk for ovarian carcinomas. Additionally, the protein levels of ER and PgR were independent of the PROGINS status.

Progesterone synthesis and myelin formation in peripheral nerves

Progesterone is synthesized in the nervous system by neurons and glial cells. Because of their simple structure, plasticity and capacity of regeneration, peripheral nerves are particularly well suited for studying the biosynthesis, mechanisms of action and effects of the hormone. Schwann cells, the myelinating glial cells in the peripheral nervous system, synthesize progesterone in response to a diffusible neuronal signal. In peripheral nerves, the local synthesis of progesterone plays an important role in the formation of myelin sheaths. This has been shown in vivo, after cryolesion of the mouse sciatic nerve, and in vitro, in cocultures of Schwann cells and sensory neurons. Schwann cells also express an intracellular receptor for progesterone, which thus functions as an autocrine signalling molecule. Progesterone may promote myelination by activating the expression of genes coding for transcription factors (Krox-20) and/or for myelin proteins (P0, PMP22). Recently, it has been proposed that progesterone may indirectly regulate myelin formation by influencing gene expression in neurons. Steroid hormones also influence the proliferation of Schwann cells: estradiol becomes a potent mitogen for Schwann cells when levels of cAMP are elevated and glucocorticosteroids have been shown to increase the mitogenic effects of peptide growth factors.

The loss of estrogen and progesterone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer

Hormone responsiveness is a critical determinant of breast cancer progression and management, and the response to endocrine therapy is highly correlated with the estrogen receptor (ER)3 and progesterone receptor (PR) status of tumor cells. Thus, key areas of study in breast cancer are those mechanisms that regulate ER and PR expression in normal and malignant breast tissues. One-third of all breast cancers lack ER and PR; these conditions are associated with less differentiated tumors and poorer clinical outcome. In addition, approximately one-half of ER-positive tumors lack PR protein and patients with this phenotype are less likely to respond to hormonal therapies than those whose tumors express both receptors. Since PR is induced by ER; its presence is a marker of a functional ER. In this review, we will discuss possible mechanisms for loss of ER and PR gene expression, especially structural changes within each gene including deletions, polymorphisms or methylation. Improved understanding of the pathways that lead to loss of ER and/or PR proteins should allow the development of better predictive indicators as well as novel therapeutic approaches to target these hormone-independent cancers.

No association of a 306-bp insertion polymorphism in the progesterone receptor gene with ovarian and breast cancer

Images

A germline TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphism in the progesterone receptor gene in ovarian carcinoma

Clinical outcome in ovarian carcinoma is predicted by progesterone receptor status, indicating an endocrine aspect to this disease. Peripheral leucocyte genomic DNAs were obtained from 41 patients with primary ovarian carcinoma and 83 controls from Ireland, as well as from 26 primary ovarian carcinoma patients and 101 controls in Germany. Southern analysis using a human progesterone receptor (hPR) cDNA probe identified a germline TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) defined by two alleles: T1, represented by a 2.7 kb fragment; and T2, represented by a 1.9 kb fragment and characterised by an additional TaqI restriction site with respect to T1. An over-representation of T2 in ovarian cancer patients compared with controls in the pooled Irish/German population (P < 0.025) was observed. A difference (P < 0.02) in the distribution of the RFLP genotypes between Irish and German control populations was also observed. The allele distributions could not be shown to differ significantly from Hardy-Weinberg distribution in any subgroup. Using hPR cDNA region-specific probes, the extra TaqI restriction site was mapped to intron G of the hPR gene.

Structure of the human progesterone receptor gene

The complete organization of the human progesterone receptor (hPR) gene has been determined. It spans over 90 kbp and contains eight exons. The first exon encodes the N-terminal part of the receptor. The DNA binding domain is encoded by two exons, each exon corresponding to one zinc finger. The steroid binding domain is encoded by five exons. The nucleotide sequence of 1144 bp of the 5' flanking region has been determined.

In situ mapping of the chicken progesterone receptor gene and the ovalbumin gene

The chicken progesterone receptor (cPR) gene and the ovalbumin (OA) gene, a target of cPR regulation, have been mapped via fluorescent in situ hybridization to the two largest chromosomes of the chicken karyotype. cPR is subtelomeric on the long arm of chromosome 1 and OA is on the long arm of chromosome 2, close to the centromere. A 35-kb cosmid probe for the cPR gene and two genomic fragments of 9.2 and 15 kb for the OA gene were biotin-labeled for nonradioactive localization of the two chicken loci.

Origin of the high constitutive level of progesterone receptor in T47-D breast cancer cells

The T47-D breast cancer cell line constitutively expresses high levels of progesterone receptor (PR). This does not appear to be related to an anomaly in the estrogen receptor (ER) as shown by cloning of the ER cDNA from T47-D cells and its insertion into the expression vector pKSV-10. When transfected into heterologous Cos-7 and L cells this receptor exerts a normal biological activity, stimulating the transcription of a reporter gene only in the presence of estrogen. Moreover, normal estrogen regulation of the transcription of the reporter gene was also observed in situ in T47-D cells. Southern blot experiments showed the presence of four copies of the progesterone receptor gene in T47-D cells. This was related to the existence of four copies of chromosome 11 in these cells. The most likely explanation of the anomalous regulation of progesterone receptor expression in T47-D cells is thus the presence of at least one copy of the PR gene bearing an anomaly in its regulatory region(s).

A rapid method of epitope mapping. Application to the study of immunogenic domains and to the characterization of various forms of rabbit progesterone receptor

A method is described to map contiguous epitopes recognized by monoclonal antibodies in the case when the cDNA for a protein has been cloned. The cDNA is inserted into an expression vector allowing its acellular transcription, followed by the translation of the resulting messenger RNA. C-terminally truncated species of the protein are either generated by cutting the cDNA with restriction enzymes or arise spontaneously through stops occurring during translation of the mRNA. If necessary, progressive digestion by Bal31 of the cDNA can be used to produce an array of polypeptides having different C-terminal lengths. Immunoprecipitation then allows determination of the shortest protein recognized by the monoclonal antibody and thus to define its site of action. This method has been applied to the study of a group of selected monoclonal antibodies among the 59 that have been prepared against the rabbit progesterone receptor. Four immunogenic domains were identified lying between amino acids 1-60, 101-110, 295-325 and 370-396. There were no antibodies directed against the DNA-binding or the steroid-binding regions of the receptor. This is probably due to the high degree of amino acid sequence conservation in these domains, observed when comparing receptors from different species. The antibodies cross-reacting with highest affinity for the human receptor interact with the first immunogenic domain (amino acids 1-60). The 79-kDa form ('subunit A') of the receptor was shown to lack the two more N-terminally localized immunogenic domains (amino acids 1-60 and 101-110). The 65-kDa form lacked, in addition, the domain localized between amino acids 295 and 325. These two forms of the receptor thus correspond to deletions of the N-terminal part of the protein.

Organisation of the entire rabbit progesterone receptor mRNA and of the promoter and 5' flanking region of the gene

cDNA clones corresponding to the 3' and 5' non coding regions of the rabbit progesterone receptor (rPR) mRNA and genomic clones corresponding to the promoter and 5' flanking region of this gene were isolated and sequenced up to nucleotide -2761. The 3' non coding region is very long (3058-3553 nucleotides) and contains three different polyadenylation sites. Primer extension experiments and S1 mapping showed the existence of 2 transcription initiation sites 699 and 712 bp upstream from the initiator ATG. The promoter region contains two modified TATA boxes: TAGAAA at -17 and TAGA at -37bp. A CAACT sequence is present at position -100 and one consensus binding site for the transcription factor Sp1 is found at position -51. A 317 bp sequence was observed (positions -2590 to -2273) which belongs to the C family of the short interspersed repeats of the rabbit. Sequences resembling the consensus for estrogen and progesterone responsive elements are observed at several locations in the 5' flanking region. The progesterone receptor is present in tissue extracts mainly as a mixture of two molecular species (110 and 79 kDa) whose origin remains currently debated. By Northern blot analysis we have shown, using rabbit and human mRNAs, that these receptor species are not derived from separate mRNAs. Transcription-translation experiments also showed that, at least in vitro, they are not derived by use of different translation initiation sites on the same messenger RNA.