Control of photosynthesis by the carbohydrate level in leaves of the C4 plant Amaranthus edulis L

Sugar sensing in C4 source leaves: a gap that needs to be filled

Plant growth depends on sugar production and export by photosynthesizing source leaves and sugar allocation and import by sink tissues (grains, roots, stems, and young leaves). Photosynthesis and sink demand are tightly coordinated through metabolic (substrate, allosteric) feedback and signalling (sugar, hormones) mechanisms. Sugar signalling integrates sugar production with plant development and environmental cues. In C3 plants (e.g. wheat and rice), it is well documented that sugar accumulation in source leaves, due to source-sink imbalance, negatively feeds back on photosynthesis and plant productivity. However, we have a limited understanding about the molecular mechanisms underlying those feedback regulations, especially in C4 plants (e.g. maize, sorghum, and sugarcane). Recent work with the C4 model plant Setaria viridis suggested that C4 leaves have different sugar sensing thresholds and behaviours relative to C3 counterparts. Addressing this research priority is critical because improving crop yield requires a better understanding of how plants coordinate source activity with sink demand. Here we review the literature, present a model of action for sugar sensing in C4 source leaves, and suggest ways forward.

Spatial expression patterns of genes encoding sugar sensors in leaves of C4 and C3 grasses

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The mechanisms of sugar sensing in grasses remain elusive, especially those using C4 photosynthesis even though a large proportion of the world's agricultural crops utilize this pathway. We addressed this gap by comparing the expression of genes encoding components of sugar sensors in C3 and C4 grasses, with a focus on source tissues of C4 grasses. Given C4 plants evolved into a two-cell carbon fixation system, it was hypothesized this may have also changed how sugars were sensed.

METHODS

For six C3 and eight C4 grasses, putative sugar sensor genes were identified for target of rapamycin (TOR), SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1), hexokinase (HXK) and those involved in the metabolism of the sugar sensing metabolite trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) using publicly available RNA deep sequencing data. For several of these grasses, expression was compared in three ways: source (leaf) versus sink (seed), along the gradient of the leaf, and bundle sheath versus mesophyll cells.

KEY RESULTS

No positive selection of codons associated with the evolution of C4 photosynthesis was identified in sugar sensor proteins here. Expressions of genes encoding sugar sensors were relatively ubiquitous between source and sink tissues as well as along the leaf gradient of both C4 and C3 grasses. Across C4 grasses, SnRK1β1 and TPS1 were preferentially expressed in the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, respectively. Species-specific differences of gene expression between the two cell types were also apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive transcriptomic study provides an initial foundation for elucidating sugar-sensing genes within major C4 and C3 crops. This study provides some evidence that C4 and C3 grasses do not differ in how sugars are sensed. While sugar sensor gene expression has a degree of stability along the leaf, there are some contrasts between the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells.

Control limits for accumulation of plant metabolites: brute force is no substitute for understanding

Which factors limit metabolite accumulation in plant cells? Are theories on flux control effective at explaining the results? Many biotechnologists cling to the idea that every pathway has a rate limiting enzyme and target such enzymes first in order to modulate fluxes. This often translates into large effects on metabolite concentration, but disappointing small increases in flux. Rate limiting enzymes do exist, but are rare and quite opposite to what predicted by biochemistry. In many cases however, flux control is shared among many enzymes. Flux control and concentration control can (and must) be distinguished and quantified for effective manipulation. Flux control for several 'building blocks' of metabolism is placed on the demand side, and therefore increasing demand can be very successful. Tampering with supply, particularly desensitizing supply enzymes, is usually not very effective, if not dangerous, because supply regulatory mechanisms function to control metabolite homeostasis. Some important, but usually unnoticed, metabolic constraints shape the responses of metabolic systems to manipulation: mass conservation, cellular resource allocation and, most prominently, energy supply, particularly in heterotrophic tissues. The theoretical basis for this view shall be explored with recent examples gathered from the manipulation of several metabolites (vitamins, carotenoids, amino acids, sugars, fatty acids, polyhydroxyalkanoates, fructans and sugar alcohols). Some guiding principles are suggested for an even more successful engineering of plant metabolism.

Regulation of photosynthesis by sugars in sugarcane leaves

In sugarcane, increased sink demand has previously been shown to result in increased photosynthetic rates that are correlated with a reduction in leaf hexose concentrations. To establish whether sink limitation of photosynthesis is a result of sugar accumulation in the leaf, excision and cold-girdling techniques were used to modify leaf sugar concentrations in pot-grown sugarcane. In excised leaves that were preincubated in darkness for 3h, sucrose accumulation was reduced but accumulated again upon transfer to the light, while hexose concentrations remained lower than in controls (7.7 micromol mg(-1)FW versus 18.6 micromol mg(-1)FW hexose in controls). These results were associated with a 66% and 59% increase in photosynthetic assimilation (A) and electron transport rate (ETR), respectively, compared to controls maintained in the light. Similar increases in photosynthesis were observed when dark-treated leaves were supplied with 5mM sorbitol, but not when supplied with 5mM sucrose. Further analyses of (14)C-labeled sugars indicated rapid turnover between sucrose and hexose. Cold-girdling (5 degrees C) increased sucrose and hexose levels and resulted in a decline of photosynthetic rates over 5d (48% and 35% decline in assimilation rate and ETR, respectively). These sugar-induced changes in photosynthesis were independent of changes in stomatal conductance. This study demonstrates that the down-regulation of photosynthesis in response to culm sugar accumulation reported previously could be due to the knock-on effect of accumulation of sugar in leaf tissue, and supports the contention that hexose, rather than sucrose, is responsible for the modulation of photosynthetic activity.

Photosynthesis with single-rooted Amaranthus leaves. II. Regulation of ribuelose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, NAD-malic enzyme and NAD-malate dehydrogenase and coordination between PCR and C4 photosynthetic metabolism in response to changes in the source-sink balance

We have studied source-sink relationships with a model consisting of single-rooted leaves without petioles. We previously reported that the rate of photosynthesis decreased when C4 model plants prepared from Amaranthus cruentus leaves were subjected to sink-limited conditions by exposure to continuous light for a few days. It was suggested that the inhibition is due to a coordinated decrease in the activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPcase) and phosphoenol-pyruvate carboxylase (PEPcase), both essential enzymes for photosynthesis in C4 plants. We further investigated the mechanisms behind the decreased activity of RuBPcase, PEPcase, NAD-malic enzyme and NAD-malate dehydrogenase. The results suggested that (1) the initial activity of RuBPcase is suppressed by a lowering of the P(i) level in chloroplasts, (2) the inhibition of PEPcase is due to dephosphorylation of the enzyme via the inhibition of PEPcase kinase and PEPcase phosphatase, (3) the inhibition of NAD-malic enzyme and NAD-malate dehydrogenase is derived from the oxidation of these enzymes, and (4) some proteinous factor(s) may be involved in the inhibition of the activity of these latter three enzymes. The significance of a coordinated decrease in these enzymes in response to a change in the source-sink balance is discussed.

Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants

This review reports on the processes associated with carbon transfer and metabolism in leaves and growing organs and the role of long-distance transport and vascular links in the regulation of carbon partitioning in plants. Partitioning is clearly influenced by both the supply and demand for photosynthate and is moderated by vascular connections and the storage capacity of the leaves and pathway tissues. However there appears to be little more than circumstantial evidence either that short distance transfer of carbon within either the source or the sink, or that long-distance transport in the phloem, are limiting photosynthesis or growth directly. Although individual biochemical and physiological processes relating to photosynthesis and growth may be well understood, the factors primarily responsible for the control of carbon partitioning in plants have not been clearly identified. There is a need for a greater understanding of organ initiation and development (source and sink formation and potential size), the clear identification of whether growth is sink or source limited (including possible sink-controlled photosynthesis) and a detailed assessment of the role of storage in buffering developmental and environmental changes in sink and source activity. Also more information is needed on the role of hormonal and nutritional factors in regulating source and sink activity (organ interactions not directly associated with carbon transfer). CONTENTS Summary 341 I. Introduction 342 II. General source-sink relationships 342 III. Control at the source 345 IV. The utilization of photosynthate: sink characteristics and limitations 353 V. Vascular constraints and temporary storage 360 VI. Concluding comments 366 Acknowledgements 366 References 367.

Factors influencing the capacity for photosynthetic carbon assimilation in barley leaves at low temperatures

The aim of this work was to examine the effect upon photosynthetic capacity of short-term exposure (up to 10 h) to low temperatures (5° C) of darkened leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) plants. The carbohydrate content, metabolite status and the photosynthetic rate of leaves were measured at low temperature, high light and higher than ambient CO2. Under these conditions we could detect whether previous exposure of leaves to low temperature overcame the limitation by phosphate which occurs in leaves of plants not previously exposed to low temperatures. The rates of CO2 assimilation measured at 8° C differed by as much as twofold, depending upon the pretreatment. (i) Leaves from plants which had previously been darkened for 24 h had a low content of carbohydrate, had the lowest CO2-assimilation rates at low temperature, and photosynthesis was limited by carbohydrate, as shown by a large stimulation of photosynthesis by feeding glucose, (ii) Leaves from plants which had previously been illuminated for 24 h and which contained large carbohydrate reserves showed an accumulation of phosphorylated intermediates and higher CO2-assimilation rates at low temperature, but nevertheless remained limited by phosphate, (iii) Maximum rates of CO2 assimilation at low temperature were observed in leaves which had intermediate reserves of carbohydrate or in leaves which were rich in carbohydrate and which were also fed phosphate. It is suggested that carbohydrate reserves potentiate the system for the achievement of high rates of photosynthesis at low temperatures by accumulation of photosynthetic intermediates such as hexose phosphates, but that this potential cannot be realised if, at the same time, carbohydrate accumulation is itself leading to feedback inhibition of photosynthesis.