Analysis of the acquisition and extinction of food-reinforced behaviour in rats after the administration of chlorpromazine

The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement

Effects of prior exposure to the experimental chamber with levers present or absent and variable-time (VT) 60-s water deliveries arranged during one, five, or no 1-hr sessions were examined in rats during a 6-hr response-acquisition session in which presses on one lever produced water delivery immediately or after a 15-s resetting delay, and presses on the other lever canceled scheduled water deliveries. Response acquisition was (a) slower to occur when water deliveries were delayed, (b) most consistent in groups that had received five VT sessions, and (c) impaired by the presence of levers only when there had been five VT sessions and water deliveries were delayed during the acquisition session.

The effects of pyridostigmine bromide and permethrin, alone or in combination, on response acquisition in male and female rats

It has been hypothesized that concurrent exposure to pyridostigmine bromide and permethrin may have contributed to the development of neurocognitive symptoms in Gulf War veterans. The present experiment was designed to investigate the effects of pyridostigmine bromide and permethrin alone, or in combination, on the acquisition of a novel response, one measure of normal cognitive functioning. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with pyridostigmine bromide (1.5 mg/kg/day, by gavage in a volume of 5 ml/kg) or its vehicle for 7 consecutive days. They then also received an intraperitoneal injection of permethrin (0, 15, or 60 mg/kg) before they were exposed to an experimental session during which they could earn food by pressing a lever in an operant chamber. Serum permethrin levels increased as a function of its dose, and were higher in rats treated with pyridostigmine bromide. Sex differences were observed as permethrin levels were higher in female rats than in male rats following the highest dose. Pyridostigmine bromide delayed response acquisition in male and female rats, and resulted in higher response rates on the inactive lever in female rats than in male rats. Although permethrin levels were higher in subjects treated with pyridostigmine bromide than in those treated with vehicle, there were no differences in the behavioral effects of permethrin. Whether or not these behavioral effects of pyridostigmine bromide are of central or peripheral origin will need to be determined in future studies, as its effects on motor activity and/or gastro-intestinal motility may have affected response acquisition.

MDMA and learning: effects of acute and neurotoxic exposure in the rat

In two experiments, the effects of MDMA on the acquisition of lever-press responding of rats were examined under procedures in which water delivery was delayed by 0, 10, or 20 s relative to the response that produced it. In the first study, experimentally naive, water-deprived rats received an intraperitoneal injection of MDMA (0, 1.0, 3.2, or 5.6 mg/kg) prior to one 8-h experimental session. Response acquisition was observed under all conditions at all drug doses. MDMA increased the total number of responses emitted and the total number of water deliveries earned in dose-dependent fashion, but only when reinforcement was immediate. Under conditions of delay, MDMA had no effect on either measure. Under all reinforcement conditions, higher doses of MDMA typically produced an initial reduction in lever pressing, and in that sense interfered with learning. In the second study, rats received an MDMA injection regimen previously shown to be neurotoxic. Control rats received saline solution according to the same injection schedule. Two weeks after completing the regimen, rats were water deprived and exposed to behavioral procedures as described for the first experiment. Although MDMA significantly reduced 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels in the striatum and prefrontal cortex, mean performance of rats exposed to MDMA did not differ from that of rats exposed to vehicle. Twenty-five percent of the rats exposed to MDMA and delayed reinforcement did fail to acquire responding, which suggests that further study of the effects of neurotoxic doses of MDMA on initial response acquisition is warranted.

Effects of chlorpromazine on rats' acquisition of lever-press responding with immediate and delayed reinforcement

The effects of chlorpromazine (0, 2, 6, and 10 mg/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press responding by rats were examined under conditions where reinforcement (water delivery) was immediate or delayed. Under the immediate reinforcement condition, water-deprived rats were exposed during 8-h sessions to a fixed-ratio 1 (FR 1) schedule of water delivery without prior autoshaping or hand shaping. Under the delayed reinforcement condition, similar rats were exposed to a tandem FR 1 fixed-time 8-s schedule of water delivery. A different squad of eight rats was exposed to each delay condition and drug dose. For all subjects, responses on one lever produced water and responses on a second lever had no programmed consequences. Regardless of whether reinforcement was immediate or delayed, chlorpromazine reduced in dose-dependent fashion the mean number of operative-lever responses emitted, which suggests that the drug interfered with learning. At all chlorpromazine doses except 10 mg/kg, substantially more operative-lever than inoperative-lever responding occurred, indicating that the operant response was acquired. Chlorpromazine at 2 and 6 mg/kg disrupted the acquisition of stimulus control by the operative lever when reinforcement was delayed, but not when it was immediate. At 10 mg/kg, most subjects did not acquire lever-pressing regardless of whether they were exposed to the immediate or delayed reinforcement procedure. Procedures similar to those used in the present study appear to provide a reasonable assay for examining how drugs affect the initial behavioral effects of immediate and delayed reinforcement, and may merit further investigation.

Effects of D-amphetamine on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement

The present study examined in 8-hour sessions the effects of d-amphetamine (1.0, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press responding in rats that were exposed to procedures in which water delivery was delayed by 0, 8, or 16 seconds relative to the response that produced it. Both nonresetting- and resetting-delay conditions were studied. Although neither shaping nor autoshaping occurred, substantial levels of operative-lever responding developed under all conditions in which responses produced water. The lowest dose (1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine either had no effect on or increased operative-lever pressing, whereas higher doses typically produced an initial reduction in lever pressing. Nonetheless, overall rates of operative-lever pressing at these doses were as high as, or higher than, those observed with vehicle. Thus, response acquisition was observed under all reinforcement procedures at all drug doses. In the absence of the drug, most responding occurred on the operative lever when reinforcement was immediate. Such differential responding also developed under both nonresetting- and resetting-delay procedures when the delay was 8 seconds, but not when it was 16 seconds. d-Amphetamine did not affect the development of differential responding under any procedure. Thus, consistent with d-amphetamine's effects under repeated acquisition procedures, the drug had no detrimental effect on learning until doses that produced general behavioral disruption were administered.

The neurochemistry and pharmacology of extinction behavior

The role of various neurotransmitter systems in the brain in extinction behavior is examined. An attempt is made to suggest psychological mechanisms (such as attention, secondary reinforcement or internal inhibition) by which the neurotransmitter systems or drugs act to produce the observed alteration in extinction behavior. The putative neurotransmitters acetylcholine, noradrenaline, dopamine, serotonin, endorphins and the peptides are reviewed, as are pharmacological agents such as the benzodiazepines, the barbiturates, the psychodelics, the neuroleptics, the psychomotor stimulants and cannabinoids. Other treatments and factors are considered such as peripheral hormones and the adrenal-pituitary axis. It is suggested that the noradrenergic system may be involved in the expression of extinction behavior by a role in selective attention, the dopamine system via an involvement with secondary reinforcement, the cholinergic system by a mechanism of response inhibition and the barbiturates and benzodiazepines by a block of nonreward.

Effects of low and moderate doses of chlorpromazine on discrimination learning in the rat

The effects of chlorpromazine on the acquisition of a brightness discrimination with food reward were examined. Doses of 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg of CPZ as well as saline were administered intraperitoneally to 4 groups of 7 Sprague-Dawley rats, 1 h prior to testing. After a 3-week period of habituation and pre-training, rats were tested 20 trials a day, 7 days a week. No drug effect was found on the number of trials to reach a criterion of 18/20 successive correct responses, which required an average of 6.2 days of training. Precriterion latencies, however, showed an increase as a function of increasing dose level. Post-choice latencies were not affected, eliminating motor retardation as an explanation for the latency effect.

Effects of chlorpromazine on exploration and habituation in the rat

1. The effects of chlorpromazine, 2 and 4 mg/kg, on exploration were investigated under two independent influences-food deprivation and time of day.2. Rats had three 3-minute trials in a hole-board apparatus; hole-investigation (head-dips) and general motor activity were recorded.3. On trial 1 chlorpromazine reduced exploration to half the control level, but on trial 3 it had no effect on motor activity or head-dips.4. General activity habituated from trial 1 to 3 in all groups, but some of the drug groups did not show significant habituation of head-dips, due to the low level of responding on trial 1.