Effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on schedule-controlled behavior

Effects of exposure regimen on changes in sensitivity to the effects of cocaine on schedule-controlled behavior in rhesus monkeys

It has been reported that conditions of drug exposure can influence changes in sensitivity to cocaine upon repeated administration. In the present experiment, the behavioral effects of prolonged exposure to continuous or intermittent infusion of cocaine were compared in rhesus monkeys responding under a multiple component fixed-ratio (FR) schedule of food presentation. In order to quantify changes in sensitivity to cocaine, cumulative dose-response functions for acute cocaine were determined using a multiple schedule comprised of six 10-minute components separated by time-out periods of 3 minutes. Initially, cocaine decreased responding in a dose-related manner. Continuous infusion of cocaine (4 mg/kg per day) for a period of 4 weeks resulted in a 2- to 4-fold shift to the right in the cocaine dose-response function, i.e., tolerance developed. In contrast, when the same daily dose of cocaine was injected intermittently (1.0 mg/kg per injection) four times/day to different monkeys, there was no change in the effects of cocaine on responding. The present results support the notion that the dosing regimen is an important determinant of changes in sensitivity to the behavioral effects of cocaine. Additionally, since sensitization failed to develop upon intermittent administration of cocaine, behavioral baseline may play a role in changes in sensitivity to cocaine.

Environment-specific conditioning and sensitization with (+)-amphetamine

Learning variables have an important role in determining the behavioral effects of some pharmacological treatments. Environmental control of sensitization and conditioning of the stimulant effects of (+)-amphetamine (AMPH) were studied in two experiments. Rats were given 6 1-hr habituation sessions in automated activity chambers conducted every second day. Two days later the 12 rats in the paired group in each study received AMPH (2.0 mg/kg) followed immediately by placement in the chambers for 1 hr whereas rats in the unpaired groups received saline. All rats were injected the following day and left in their home cages afterwards. At this time the paired groups received saline and the unpaired groups received AMPH. Three days later a second pairing and subsequent home cage injection was administered, using the same procedure. Immediately prior to the test session (4 days after the last pairing session) all rats in the sensitization experiment received AMPH and those in the conditioning study received saline. During pairing sessions AMPH treated rats exhibited more vertical activity than controls. On the saline test session in the conditioning study there was still a significant group difference demonstrating environment-specific conditioning. There was no evidence of sensitization on vertical activity; however, a significant difference in horizontal activity was seen on the AMPH test session. Results suggest that these two phenomena can be dissociated behaviorally and may not follow the same time-course.

Amphetamine cumulation and tolerance development: concurrent and opposing phenomena

Whether diminished or augmented behavioral effects are observed after repeated amphetamine administration may reflect the relative balance between tolerance and drug cumulation. To investigate this, we measured the distribution of d-amphetamine in various tissues and its effects on performance of a conditioned behavior after acute or chronic treatment. Rats trained to lever press under a fixed ratio 5 schedule for food-reinforcement were tested daily for 4 min epochs in each of 6 consecutive hours. After responding was stable, animals were injected for 16 days with saline or 1.0, 2.5 or 5.0 mg 3H-d-amphetamine sulfate/kg IP 15 min before the second daily behavioral epoch. On the 17th day, animals which had been receiving 3H-d-amphetamine were given their usual dose and those which had been receiving saline were given one of the doses of 3H-d-amphetamine; all animals were decapitated approximately 2 1/4 hours after this final injection, immediately after the 4th behavioral epoch. Brain, heart, muscle, epididymal fat, and kidney were removed for subsequent analysis of unchanged 3H-d-amphetamine. The experiment was carried out in two phases, 3 1/2 months apart, which inadvertently resulted in shipment of rats from different buildings on the supplier's campus. Acute treatment produced dose-related effects on operant responding, the lowest dose increasing responding and the highest dose suppressing it. Chronic injection of the highest dose of d-amphetamine resulted in significant attenuation of its acute suppressant effect. Additionally, chronic treatment suppressed responding of rats 23 1/4 hours after injection (i.e., before the subsequent daily injection). Tissue levels of d-amphetamine were dose related and d-amphetamine cumulated after chronic treatment with the highest dose. When d-amphetamine was administered acutely, the behavioural effect immediately before decapitation was highly correlated with the concentration of d-amphetamine in brain and in heart. This was not the case after chronic treatment, since rats given the higher doses showed less behavioural effect than would have been predicted from the concentrations of d-amphetamine in their tissues. Besides evidence of tolerance and cumulation of drug in one or more tissues, a significant phase or colony difference emerged, which could have been due to seasonal or other factors. Additional, different experiments, performed concurrently on a new shipment of rats from each colony, allowed us to conclude that the original observations of phase differences were not due to seasonal differences or chance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Behavioural tolerance to amphetamine and other psychostimulants: the case for considering behavioural mechanisms

An hypothesis is presented about the nature of behavioural tolerance in animals to stimulant drugs. It is suggested that, in many behavioural procedures, tolerance is due to behavioural adaptation to those drug effects which cause disruption of ongoing rewarded behaviour. This unitary hypothesis accounts for the available data on tolerance and cross-tolerance to stimulants more effectively than all of the other more conventional explanations which are based upon dispositional or functional concepts, the most common of which are described, evaluated, and found to be inadequate. Furthermore, it is suggested that attempts to explain tolerance in terms of changes in synaptic functioning are subject to very considerable problems of interpretation and that an analysis of behavioural mechanisms may be of greater value in understanding the process of behavioural tolerance. Evidence for the basic behavioural hypothesis is outlined in some detail, and a theoretical justification presented for its major assumptions. Operant studies of chronic stimulant effects on behaviour have often produced very complex patterns of data, considerable differences being reported both between subjects and between studies. A speculative model is presented which attempts to account for this pattern of data in tolerance studies.

Interactions between narcotic agonists, partial agonists andd antagonists evaluated by punished an unpunished behavior in the rat

The effects of morphine, ketocyclazocine, cyclazocine, and SKF-10,047 were tested alone and in conjunction with naltrexone or naloxone, in rats responding under a multiple fixed-interval 3-min schedule of food presentation. Under this paradigm, electric shock was delivered on a fixed-ratio schedule for responses occurring during alternate schedule components. All of the drugs (except naltrexone and naloxone) decreased average rates of responding maintained by the unpunished component in a dose-dependent manner. The rate-decreasing effects of morphine and ketocyclazocine were antagonized by naltrexone. The rate-decreasing effects of cyclazocine were only slightly reversed by the antagonists, while those effects of SKF-10,047 were not affected by naltrexone. In some animals, certain doses of SKF-10,047 increased unpunished responding. This rate-increasing effect was antagonized by naltrexone. Morphine, ketocyclazocine, cyclazocine, and SKF-10,047 increased responding that was suppressed by electric shock, and these increases were antagonized by naltrexone and naloxone. Thus, the antagonism of opiate effects by narcotic antagonists depends in part on the behavior being evaluated.

Effects of phencyclidine, d-amphetamine and pentobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior in rats

The effects of phencyclidine, d-amphetamine, and pentobarbital on responding maintained under a multiple fixed-interval (FI) 3-min fixed-ratio (FR) 30 schedule of food presentation were studied in rats. Phencyclidine (0.32-7.5 mg/kg) had a biphasic effect on overall response rate in both components; response rate increased and then decreased as the dose was increased. The FR was slightly more sensitive to the rate-decreasing effects of phencyclidine than the FI. The effects of d-amphetamine (0.1-7.5 mg/kg) on overall response rate were qualitatively similar to those of phencyclidine. The FI tended to be slightly more sensitive than the FR to the rate-increasing effects of d-amphetamine. Pentobarbital (1-18 mg/kg) produced little or no rate-increasing effects in the FR at low doses and decreased FR response rate at higher doses. In the FI, pentobarbital produced small increases in overall rate at intermediate doses while decreasing response rate at higher doses. The FR tended to be more sensitive than the FI to the rate-decreasing effects of pentobarbital. Unlike d-amphetamine and pentobarbital, phencyclidine produced smaller rate-increasing effects when the dose-effect curves were redetermined. Within the FI, the effects of phencyclidine and d-amphetamine on response rate were generally independent of the control rate of responding.

Effects of acute and chronic administration of phenobarbital and d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled behavior

The effects of acute and chronic administration of phenobarbital and d-amphetamine were determined in rats responding under a multiple fixed-interval five minute fixed-ratio 30 (mult FI 5 FR 30) schedule of food presentation. After determining the acute effects of each drug, the drugs were injected daily with one group of rats receiving the drugs before each behavioral session while another group received the drugs immediately after each daily session. After four to seven consecutive injections, tolerance developed to the effects of phenobarbital on the average rates of responding under FI and FR schedule components only if the drug was administered before each session. Tolerance was more pronounced for responding druing the terminal portions of the FI component than for responding during either the initial portions of the FI or the FR component. Evidence for a selective tolerance to the effects of the drug on responding during the final segments of the FI was also obtained in rats responding under an FI 5 schedule. In contrast, injection of d-amphetamine for seven to eight consecutive days failed to produce any tolerance to the effects of the drug on responding under mult FI 5 FR 30, FI 5, or FR 30 schedules. These results indicate that the development of tolerance to the effects of phenobarbital depended both upon the temporal relationship of the drug effects to the behavioral testing and upon the schedules controlling behavior. These findings are discussed in terms of theories of behavioral tolerance.