External stimulus control in a "drug-discrimination" procedure: drug effects and inter-animal variation

Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response

In drug discrimination research, detection of drug stimuli by animals is used for investigating various properties of psychoactive drugs. The major issue addressed by this paper is whether detection of drug stimuli by animals is a quantal or graded event. Some data suggest that detection of a drug stimulus by animals is quantal in nature. Thus, variations in drug stimulus substitution may only reflect variations in threshold for detecting the training stimulus rather than the current concept of these data reflecting graded responding to stimulus intensity. Therefore, drug discrimination procedures may have limited utility for detecting quantitative differences in the subjective effects of varying drug doses. In order to examine this problem, a method for measuring continuous response gradients in individual animals is needed. Tests for quantal responding generally use the distribution of responses on two manipulanda as the dependent measure. However, this variable may be inadequate for detecting a graded response, and may actually reflect loss of stimulus control or a deterioration in performance, rather than changes in response magnitude. Most alternative measures utilize response rate. Unfortunately, these measures are influenced by the direct rate-altering properties of some drugs. One possible alternative method is conditioned taste aversion as the discriminative task. This paradigm provides a means for not only ascertaining if graded discriminative responses occur in individual animals, but also more rapidly training a drug discrimination. Thus, using conditioned taste aversion techniques for measuring a drug discrimination may provide better indices for detecting response gradations.

Effects of clozapine on fixed-consecutive-number responding in rats: a comparison to other neuroleptic drugs

The effects of clozapine and several other neuroleptic drugs were examined in rats responding under fixed-consecutive-number (FCN) schedules with minimum response requirements of 4 and 8. Under these schedules, rats were trained to respond either 8 or more times or 4 or more times on one lever, and then respond once on a second lever. In one component of these schedules, an external discriminative stimulus was presented following the completion of the response requirement on the first lever, whereas no stimulus change was programmed under the other. Under the FCN 8 schedule without the external discriminative stimulus, clozapine produced large dose-dependent decreases in accuracy (percent of reinforced response runs), whereas molindone produced small decreases in accuracy. Neither clozapine or molindone, however, altered accuracy under the FCN 4 without the external discriminative stimulus. Under these same schedules, loxapine, chlorpromazine, haloperidol and thioridazine produced small increases in accuracy at intermediate doses without affecting accuracy at the low and high doses. None of the neuroleptics evaluated produced accuracy-altering effects under the FCN schedules with the external discriminative stimulus. In general, all of these drugs decreased response rates in a dose-dependent fashion. The order of potency for the rate-decreasing effects of these drugs was loxapine greater than haloperidol greater than molindone greater than clozapine = chlorpromazine greater than thioridazine. Thus, the effects of clozapine on accuracy under the FCN schedules without the external discriminative stimulus differed qualitatively from those of other neuroleptic agents.

Effects of chlordiazepoxide training dose on the mixed agonist-antagonist properties of benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788, in a drug discrimination procedure

In experiment 1, rats (n = 12) were trained to discriminate the benzodiazepine (BDZ) compound chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 20 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced procedure, and subsequently were tested for stimulus control with different doses of CDP, Ro 15-1788 (a proposed BDZ receptor antagonist) and Ro 15-1788 plus 20 mg/kg CDP. Ro 15-1788 (0.63-40 mg/kg) dose-dependently antagonized CDP, and induced predominantly saline appropriate responding when administered alone. Thereafter, the same rats were retrained by progressively decreasing the training dose, to discriminate 2.5 mg/kg CDP from saline, and were tested again with the same compounds. Ro 15-1788 (0.16-40 mg/kg) now failed to antagonize CDP (2.5 mg/kg) and increased the percentage of drug-appropriate responding in a dose-related manner when administered alone. In experiment 2, separate groups of rats (n = 10) were similarly trained to discriminate either 15 or 3 mg/kg CDP from saline. Tests with CDP, Ro 15-1788 and Ro 15-1788 plus CDP (either 15 or 3 mg/kg) yielded similar results to experiment 1, suggesting that the training dose effects on generalization and antagonism of Ro 15-1788 were not affected by the manner in which the lower CDP dose acquired drug stimulus control. It is concluded that mixed agonist-antagonist properties are apparent after variations of the BDZ training dose in a drug discrimination procedure.

Discriminative properties of the psychostimulant dl-cathinone in a two lever operant task. Lack of evidence for dopaminergic mediation

In order to analyse further the discriminative stimulus properties of stimulant drugs, rats were trained to discriminate 2.0 mg/kg of dl-cathinone in a two-lever operant task. Dose-related generalization was seen to cathinone itself and to a wide range of stimulant drugs including d-amphetamine, cocaine, methylphenidate, pipradrol and cathine, i.e. (+)norpseudoephedrine. The high degree of specificity of the cathinone cue at the specific training dose studied was shown by the fact that the following nonstimulant drugs failed to generalize at all to cathinone, even in large doses--haloperidol, chlordiazepoxide, fenfluramine and fentanyl. The cathinone cue at 2.0 mg/kg was probably of central origin because phydroxyamphetamine (a polar congener of amphetamine) failed to generalize to cathinone at a dose nearly 50 times the ED50 for amphetamine generalization. Phenylethylamine (PEA; alpha-demethylamphetamine) and deuterated phenylethylamine (alpha, alpha, d2-PEA), a long acting derivative of phenylethylamine which is resistant to metabolism by monoamine oxidase, produced at most partial (60%) generalization to cathinone, even in large doses. alpha-Demethylcathinone failed to generalize at all to cathinone at doses up to 10 times the ED50 for cathinone. Thus, the alpha-methyl groups of both amphetamine and cathinone are important in determining their cue properties. The involvement of dopaminergic systems in the cathinone cue was investigated by examining generalization to apomorphine and antagonism by haloperidol. Apomorphine produced at most 29% generalization to cathinone. Haloperidol, at doses up to 0.3 mg/kg, produced at most 50% antagonism of both the cathinone cue and of the ability of amphetamine to substitute for cathinone. It is suggested that the evidence for dopaminergic mediation of the cue properties of cathinone and of other CNS stimulants is somewhat tenuous, whilst endogenous phenylethylamine may play some part in the mediation of the stimulant cue. Haloperidol, alone and in conjunction with amphetamine or cathinone, produced a remarkable tendency for subjects to emit a greater proportion of their total responses on the inoperative rather than the operative lever than was seen after saline or injections of vehicle. This action of a neuroleptic drug suggests, in accordance with Colpaert, Niemegeers and Janssen (1977), that in drug discrimination antagonism studies involving neuroleptics, and perhaps other drugs, quantal (lever selection) rather than quantitative (percentage of responses on the drug lever) indices may be the procedures of choice.