The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization

Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review

Drug discrimination has been an important technique in behavioural pharmacology for at least 40 years. The characteristics of drug-produced discriminative stimuli are influenced by behavioural and pharmacological variables, including the doses used to establish discriminations. This review covers studies on the effects of varying the training dose of a drug in a search for general principles that are applicable across different drug classes and methodological approaches. With respect to quantitative changes, relationships between training dose and the rate of acquisition or magnitude of stimulus control were found for most drug classes. Acquisition accelerated with dose up to a point beyond which drug-induced impairments of performance had a deleterious impact. Sensitivity to the training drug as measured by ED(50) values typically increased when the training dose was reduced. Qualitative changes were more complex and appeared to fall into three categories: (a) changes in profiles of generalization between partial and full agonists; (b) reduced specificity of some discriminations at small training doses; and (c) changes in the relative salience of actions mediated through different neurotransmitter systems or from central and peripheral sites. Three-lever discrimination procedures incorporating 'drug versus drug' or 'dose versus dose' contingencies enabled detection of more subtle differences than the simple 'drug versus no drug' approach when applied to the opioid, hallucinogen and barbiturate classes of drugs. These conclusions have implications for the interpretation of data from studies that use either within-subject or between-subject designs for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs.

Nicotine and methamphetamine share discriminative stimulus effects

BACKGROUND

Nicotine and methamphetamine are both abused in similar settings, sometimes together. Because there are known interactions between central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and dopamine receptors, it is of interest to characterize the nature of the interaction of these two compounds in vivo.

METHODS

The purpose of this study was to characterize the extent to which these two compounds produce similar discriminative stimulus effects and to identify pharmacological mechanisms for their interaction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate methamphetamine or nicotine from saline. First, the ability of methamphetamine and nicotine to cross-substitute in rats trained to the other compound was tested. Subsequently, the ability of a dopamine antagonist (haloperidol) and a centrally acting nicotinic antagonist (mecamylamine) to block the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine and nicotine were also tested.

RESULTS

Nicotine fully substituted in methamphetamine-trained rats, but methamphetamine only partially substituted in nicotine-trained rats. In nicotine-trained rats, mecamylamine fully antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine, but haloperidol had no effect. The partial substitution of methamphetamine was partially attenuated by haloperidol, but not altered by mecamylamine. In methamphetamine-trained rats, mecamylamine failed to antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, but haloperidol fully blocked the methamphetamine cue. Mecamylamine blocked the ability of nicotine to substitute for methamphetamine, but haloperidol had no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that nicotine and methamphetamine share discriminative stimulus effects in some subjects and that the two compounds do not act at the same site, but produce their interaction indirectly. These findings suggest that these two compounds might be at least partially interchangeable in human users, and that there are potentially interesting pharmacological reasons for the commonly observed co-administration of nicotine and methamphetamine.

Discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate: role of training dose

gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a drug of abuse with actions at GHB and GABA receptors. This study examined whether the relative importance of GABA(A), GABA(B), and GHB receptors in the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB depends on the training dose. In comparison with a previous 100 mg/kg GHB-saline discrimination, pigeons were trained to discriminate either 178 or 56 mg/kg GHB from saline. Increasing the training dose shifted the GHB gradient to the right, and decreasing it shifted the gradient to the left. Similar shifts occurred with the GHB precursor gamma-butyrolactone, which substituted for GHB, and with the GABA(B) agonists baclofen and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acid hydrochloride (SKF97541) and the benzodiazepine diazepam, each of which produced at most 54 to 68% GHB-appropriate responding. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil, the benzodiazepine inverse agonist ethyl 8-azido-6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5-alpha]-[1,4]-benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate (Ro 15-4513), and the GHB receptor antagonist (2E)-5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen-6-ylidene ethanoic acid (NCS-382) produced a maximum of 66 to 97% GHB-appropriate responding in animals discriminating 56 or 100 mg/kg GHB and a maximum of 1 to 49% in animals discriminating 178 mg/kg. NCS-382 did not attenuate the effects of GHB. The GABA(B) antagonist 3-aminopropyl(diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid (CGP35348) blocked GHB at all training doses. The results suggest that increasing the training dose of GHB increases the pharmacological selectivity of its discriminative stimulus effects. At a high training dose, diazepam-insensitive GABA(A) receptors, for which flumazenil and Ro 15-4513 have affinity, may no longer be involved. Diazepam-sensitive GABA(A) receptors and GABA(B) receptors appear to play a similar role at all training doses. There was no evidence for GHB receptor involvement.

Drug-induced reinstatement of heroin- and cocaine-seeking behaviour following long-term extinction is associated with expression of behavioural sensitization

The present study was designed to evaluate the relationship between reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviour following long-term extinction of intravenous (i.v.) drug self-administration (an animal model for craving) and long-term behavioural sensitization. Rats were allowed to self-administer heroin (50 microg/kg per inj., 14 daily sessions), cocaine (500 microg/kg per inj., 10 daily sessions) or saline. Following a 3-week extinction period, reinstatement tests were performed to evaluate priming effects of amphetamine, cocaine and heroin on nonreinforced drug-seeking behaviour. In addition, the occurrence of long-term behavioural sensitization in rats with a history of heroin or cocaine self-administration was determined. Heroin-seeking behaviour was reinstated by heroin (0.25 mg/kg), amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and cocaine (10 mg/kg). In addition, animals with a history of heroin self-administration displayed locomotor sensitization to both heroin and amphetamine. Cocaine-seeking behaviour was reinstated by cocaine and amphetamine, but not by heroin. Interestingly, locomotor sensitization to amphetamine, but not heroin, was observed in animals with a history of cocaine self-administration. In other words, the induction of drug-seeking behaviour following a prolonged drug-free period was found to be associated with the expression of long-term behavioural sensitization. These data provide experimental evidence for a role of behavioural sensitization in the incentive motivation underlying drug-seeking behaviour. If drug hyperresponsiveness would indeed be a crucial factor in drug-induced craving in human addicts, pharmacological readjustment of the neuroadaptations underlying drug sensitization may prevent relapse to drug use long after detoxification.

Effects of restraint stress and intra-ventral tegmental area injections of morphine and methyl naltrexone on the discriminative stimulus effects of heroin in the rat

The effect of restraint stress on the discriminative stimulus properties of heroin and the role of the opioid receptor activation in the ventral tegmental area in heroin discrimination were examined. In Experiment 1, male rats were trained to discriminate heroin (0.5 mg/kg, SC) from saline under conditions of exposure to restraint (15 min/day; three times a week) or no stress. Dose-response curves were subsequently determined under conditions of no stress, restraint, corticosterone (3 mg/kg, IP), and saline. Exposure to restraint during training did not alter heroin discrimination under any of the conditions tested. In contrast, administration of restraint or the stress hormone corticosterone just prior to drug injections decreased sensitivity to the heroin cue. In Experiment 2, injections of morphine (5-10 micrograms/side) into the ventral tegmental area (VTA, the cell body region of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons) did not result in heroin-appropriate responding in animals trained to discriminate heroin injected systemically from saline. Furthermore, intra-VTA injections of the opioid antagonist methyl naltrexone (0.75-3.0 micrograms/side) did not block the discriminability of heroin given systemically. These results indicate that exposure to restraint stress or the stress hormone corticosterone in close temporal contiguity to the drug injection may reduce the sensitivity to the opioid cue. In addition, under the condition of the present experiment activation of opioid receptors in the VTA does not appear to mimic the discriminative stimulus effects of systemically administered heroin.

Functional relationships, previous history and the discrimination of a drug mixture in rats

These experiments aim to probe the role of different functional relationships between drugs, responses and reinforcers in studies on the discrimination of drug mixtures. Two-lever discriminations based on mixtures of (+)-amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg) plus pentobarbitone (10 mg/kg) have been compared in three groups of rats (n = 8) trained to discriminate: (i) the mixture from saline, called the AND-discrimination; (ii) either the mixture, amphetamine or pentobarbitone from saline, the OR-discrimination; (iii) the mixture from either amphetamine or pentobarbitone, the AND-OR-discrimination. The rats were trained in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure with a tandem schedule of food reinforcement. The rats trained on the AND procedure acquired the discrimination more rapidly than the rats trained on the other two procedures, but after 60 training sessions, all discriminations were performed with similar (90-94%) accuracy. In rats trained under the AND and the OR procedures, there was full generalization from the mixture to the largest doses used of either amphetamine or pentobarbitone. In contrast, in rats trained under the AND-OR procedure, there was no generalization from the mixture to any dose of either drug separately. The training procedures for the OR and the AND-OR groups were changed to AND-discrimination training; the effects of the different previous histories were found to persist for a prolonged period, despite the fact that training conditions were now the same in all groups. The effects of the drugs on rates of responding were also influenced by the previous training history. Thus, using different training procedures to alter functional relationships can substantially and persistently influence the major characteristics of a discrimination based on a mixture of drugs.

Increased drug sensitivity in the drug discrimination procedure afforded by drug versus drug training

Rats were trained to discriminate norfenfluramine (NF) 1.4 mg/kg from its vehicle or amphetamine (AMPH) 0.8 mg/kg or pentobarbital (PB) 6.0 mg/kg in order to determine the role that drug combination training plays in the rate of learning and sensitivity to lower drug doses. The results suggest that drug versus drug training can increase the rate of drug discrimination learning for some drugs that are learned slowly when trained in a drug versus vehicle training procedure, whereas drug versus drug training does not increase the rate of learning for other drugs that are learned rapidly. Drug versus drug training does, however, appear to increase the level of stimulus control of the training drug for all drugs examined in this study.

Discrimination of an amphetamine-pentobarbitone mixture by rats in an AND-OR paradigm

Rats were trained to discriminate a mixture of amphetamine plus pentobarbitone from either drug separately in a two-bar procedure with food reinforcement. Discrimination was 86% accurate after 48 sessions, and no dose of amphetamine or pentobarbitone alone produced mixture-appropriate responding. Some mixtures increased response rates whereas the same doses of each drug separately had little effect. The same rats were then trained to discriminate a mixture from saline. There was a continuing lack of discriminative response to amphetamine and only a partial response to pentobarbitone, and under these conditions mixtures did not increase overall response rates. Thus, the way rats are trained, and their previous history, can determine the characteristics of the cue obtained.

Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement

There have been few comparisons between different schedules of reinforcement for establishing drugs as discriminative stimuli. Fixed-ratio (FR) 10 and tandem variable-interval 1-min FR-10 schedules have been compared directly in a conventional, nicotine-saline discrimination paradigm with food reinforcement in rats. The discrimination was acquired rapidly under both schedules, with stimulus control by nicotine (0.1 mg/kg SC) being very slightly superior under the FR schedule. In 5-min extinction tests with nicotine, rats maintained under the FR schedule yielded a clear dose-response curve with a bar-selection (quantal) index; in these rats, discrimination of nicotine appeared generally poor, and dose-response curves were shallow, when the percentage of drug-appropriate responding (quantitative index) was calculated. In contrast, rats under the tandem schedule yielded clear dose-response data with both indices. In tests with (+)-amphetamine full generalization was obtained with both schedules, and with both quantitative and quantal indices. Tests of generalization to morphine were negative regardless of the training schedule or index employed. In rats under the FR-10 schedule, overall response rates declined both within and across extinction tests; the relatively high rates of responding maintained by the tandem schedule were more sensitive to the response rate-decreasing effects of morphine and amphetamine. The results confirm that orderly data may be obtained with either a FR or a tandem schedule provided that an appropriate index of discriminative response is employed. The results generally support the validity of current practices, and there will probably be no marked differences between conclusions depending on which schedule is used.

A comparison of testing procedures on the discriminative morphine stimulus

The study investigated the effects of reinforcement and non-reinforcement during test sessions, and the effects of duration of generalization test sessions on the generalization of a morphine-induced discriminative stimulus. Rats were trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg morphine from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task and were then tested for generalization of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mg/kg morphine with the training drug under both reinforced and non-reinforced contingencies during 4-min test periods. The percentage of drug-appropriate responses and response rates were recorded for the first 2 min and the second 2 min of each test session. A higher proportion of drug-appropriate responding occurred with an intermediate dose of morphine when reinforcement was available during test sessions. The frequency of responding was higher during the last 2 min than during the first 2 min of reinforced test sessions. The changes in response rate observed between the first 2 min and the last 2 min of the test sessions also depended on the reinforcement contingency available and the dose of morphine administered presession. The testing parameters thus altered the degree of generalization and the shape of the generalization curve of the morphine discrimination.

Morphine discrimination in the pigeon using a color tracking procedure

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg morphine from saline. After morphine, subjects tracked the location of red response keys and after saline, the location of green keys. When stimulus generalization to other drugs was investigated dl-methadone produced morphine-like responding and this response generalization was primarily due to the l-isomer. Pretreatment with 1.0 mg/kg naloxone shifted the morphine generalization curve 10-fold to the right but only shifted the rate suppression curve 3-fold to the right. dl-Cyclazocine generated dose-related increases in responding on the red key location and in 3 of 5 birds, responses after 1.0 mg/kg were indistinguishable from those after morphine training doses. Meperidine did not produce responding on the red keys, nor did diazepam, cocaine, d-amphetamine, phencyclidine or pentobarbital. The discriminative stimulus effects of morphine are thus stereo-selective and pharmacologically specific. Generalization of responding to dl-cyclazocine but not to phencyclidine suggests that the morphine-like discriminative dl-cyclazocine cue was not due to interaction at sigma opiate receptors.

Effects of chlordiazepoxide training dose on the mixed agonist-antagonist properties of benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788, in a drug discrimination procedure

In experiment 1, rats (n = 12) were trained to discriminate the benzodiazepine (BDZ) compound chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 20 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced procedure, and subsequently were tested for stimulus control with different doses of CDP, Ro 15-1788 (a proposed BDZ receptor antagonist) and Ro 15-1788 plus 20 mg/kg CDP. Ro 15-1788 (0.63-40 mg/kg) dose-dependently antagonized CDP, and induced predominantly saline appropriate responding when administered alone. Thereafter, the same rats were retrained by progressively decreasing the training dose, to discriminate 2.5 mg/kg CDP from saline, and were tested again with the same compounds. Ro 15-1788 (0.16-40 mg/kg) now failed to antagonize CDP (2.5 mg/kg) and increased the percentage of drug-appropriate responding in a dose-related manner when administered alone. In experiment 2, separate groups of rats (n = 10) were similarly trained to discriminate either 15 or 3 mg/kg CDP from saline. Tests with CDP, Ro 15-1788 and Ro 15-1788 plus CDP (either 15 or 3 mg/kg) yielded similar results to experiment 1, suggesting that the training dose effects on generalization and antagonism of Ro 15-1788 were not affected by the manner in which the lower CDP dose acquired drug stimulus control. It is concluded that mixed agonist-antagonist properties are apparent after variations of the BDZ training dose in a drug discrimination procedure.

Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat

Six groups of rats (N = 8), trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (5 or 20 mg/kg), pentobarbital (5 or 15 mg/kg) or ethanol (750 or 1500 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced procedure, were tested for stimulus generalization with the three drugs. Training drug, but not training dose, affected the extent of generalization to a test drug; symmetrical generalization between chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital and asymmetrical generalization between chlordiazepoxide and ethanol and between pentobarbital and ethanol was observed. Training dose level affected slope and ED50 of the generalization gradients of training drugs and substitution drugs, discriminative performance, response bias and threshold dose for response suppression. Indices of lever selection and percentage drug-appropriate lever responses yielded similar generalization maxima, slopes and ED50S. The potency of chlordiazepoxide relative to the potency of pentobarbital to induce drug stimulus generalization varied across the experimental groups. The results indicate differences between the discriminative effects of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol. It is suggested that the discriminative effects of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol are not based on their response rate modulating effects and that training dose is not a determinant for the extent of cross-generalization between these compounds.

Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases

Two groups of five pigeons each were trained to discriminate morphine 5.6 mg/kg vs cocaine 5.6 mg/kg (High dose cocaine group), and morphine 5.6 mg/kg vs cocaine 3.0 mg/kg (Low dose cocaine group), respectively. Within both groups, cocaine dose generalization gradients were radically flatter in comparison to those obtained when the same cocaine dosages were discriminated from saline, whereas morphine gradients, analogously compared, were only moderately so. Responding to non-drug tests did not deviate significantly from random in either group. After lowering morphine training doses to 3.0 mg/kg in a systematic replication of the experiment, training drugs generalization gradients took symmetrical, flattened, shapes in the High dose cocaine group, whereas in the Low dose cocaine group the previous relation between gradients was enhanced. Responding to non-drug tests in this phase did not deviate significantly from random in the High dose cocaine group, whereas the reverse was true with the Low dose cocaine group. Tests with novel drugs (apomorphine, LSD, pentobarbital and delta 9-THC), did not differentiate between the groups. The roles of generalization gradients, non-drug tests and novel drugs tests as measures of relative stimulus control of training stimuli in drug discrimination experiments are discussed within the framework of a drug discrimination model.

Effects of drug-induced differences in reinforcement frequency on discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl

Rats were trained to discriminate between fentanyl (0.04 mg/kg) and saline in a two-lever procedure. Using a FR 10 schedule of food reinforcement, drug-induced differences between the number of reinforcers obtained under fentanyl and saline conditions were observed. The effect of eliminating these differences on the outcome of generalization tests was investigated by different manipulations. In one group (N = 10), the FR 10 schedule used during saline sessions was changed to FR 6 during drug sessions. In a second group (N = 12), saline sessions ended after the number of reinforcers obtained was equal to the number obtained during the preceding drug session. A control group (N = 10) was trained using a FR 10 schedule under both conditions. Elimination of differences in reinforcement frequency accelerated the acquisition of the discrimination, diminished response bias, flattened the slope and reduced the ED50 value of generalization gradients of fentanyl, morphine and sufentanil and increased the ED50 value of naloxone in antagonizing 0.04 mg/kg fentanyl. It is concluded that the unconditioned effects of 0.04 mg/kg fentanyl on response rate in a FR 10 procedure lead to differences between saline and drug sessions which contribute to the apparent discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl.

External stimulus control in a "drug-discrimination" procedure: drug effects and inter-animal variation

Rats (N = 12) were trained to discriminate between two stimulus conditions S1 and S2, consisting of combinations of visual and tactile stimuli [S1: box lighted (L) and wooden floor insert present (W); S2: box dark (D) and grid floor present (G)] in a two-lever discrimination procedure. S1 was continuously present during half of the sessions, and S2 was continuously present during the remaining sessions. Morphine (0.3--6 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.04--0.08 mg/kg), but not chlorpromazine (1--4 mg/kg) and scopolamine (0.031--0.125 mg/kg), decreased the accuracy of discriminative responding during S1 sessions. None of the drugs significantly affected discrimination accuracy during S2 sessions. After drug testing was completed, reversed combinations of the visual and tactile stimuli were tested (i.e. L + G, and D + W). Inter-animal variation in the control by the component stimuli was observed. The results suggest that "intermediate results" (i.e. equal responding on drug and saline lever) in drug discrimination research, if observed at the highest dose of a drug at which animals still respond, may be interpreted in terms of a drug-induced disruption of discriminative responding. The results further suggest that inter-animal variation in the outcome of drug generalization tests may be partly related to inter-animal variation in the degree of stimulus control by different components of the training drug stimulus.

Drug discrimination in rats: evidence for amphetamine-like cue state following chronic haloperidol

Two groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate which of two levers to press for milk reinforcement on a VI-20 sec schedule of reinforcement on the basis of whether they were injected intraperitoneally with d-amphetamine (0.50 mg/kg or 1.50 mg/kg) or saline 15 min prior to daily 30 min training sessions. Following acquisition of the discrimination, dose-response functions were generated for both training-dose groups during 5 min test sessions. All subjects were then injected with 1.0 mg/kg of haloperidol for ten consecutive days and retested on either saline or intermediate doses of amphetamine on days 1, 2, 4 and 7 following the final haloperidol injection. The results indicated that chronic haloperidol enhanced the discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine in both training groups. More importantly, when tested on saline, subjects in both training groups made significantly more responses on the d-amphetamine lever than observed prior to chronic haloperidol. On the basis of linear regression analysis of the dose-response curves it was shown that rats in both groups responded as though they had been injected with 0.18 mg/kg of d-amphetamine. In a second experiment this increase in amphetamine-lever responding when animals were tested with saline following chronic haloperidol was replicated and in addition it was observed that chronic amphetamine had the opposite effect on this measure.