Influence of verapamil on the inotropism and pharmacokinetics of digoxin

Calcium channel blockers: spectrum of side effects and drug interactions

Calcium antagonists are a chemically heterogenous group of agents with potent cardiovascular effects which are beneficial in the treatment of angina pectoris, arterial hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias. The main side effects for the group are dose-dependent and the result of the main action or actions of the calcium antagonists, i.e. vasodilatation, negative inotropic effects and antiarrhythmic effects. Pronounced hypotension is reported for the main calcium antagonist drugs; verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. While conduction disturbances and bradycardia are seen more often after verapamil and diltiazem, tachycardia, headache and flush are more frequent after nifedipine. Constipation is relatively frequent after verapamil while nifedipine is reported to induce diarrhea in som patients. Idiosyncratic side effects are rare but have been reported from the skin, mouth, musculoskeletal system, the liver and the central nervous system. These side effects include urticarial rashes, gingival hyperplasia, arthralgia, hepathotoxicity and transistory mental confusion or akathisia. Verapamil, diltiazem and possibly also nifedipine have been reported to increase serum digoxin concentrations but the clinical relevance of these drug interactions are not clear. Furthermore, verapamil and diltiazem may potentiate the effects of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and verapamil may also potentiate the effects of neuromuscular blocking drugs. It is concluded that side effects after calcium antagonist drugs are mostly trivial and transient although they may sometimes be relatively common. Clinically relevant drug interactions are few. Judged from the point of efficacy and safety, calcium antagonists will have a major place in the future pharmacotherapy of several cardiovascular disorders.

Evaluation of antipsychotic drugs as inhibitors of multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein

RATIONALE

The multidrug resistance transporter, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is involved in efflux transport of several antipsychotics in the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we evaluated the inhibitory effect of the antipsychotics, i.e., risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, a major metabolite of risperidone, 9-OH-risperidone, and a positive control inhibitor, PSC833, on the cellular uptake of a prototypic substrate of P-gp, rhodamine (Rhd) 123, in LLC-PK1 and L-MDR1 cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After incubation of the antipsychotics (1-100 microM) and the positive (10 microM PSC833) or negative (1% dimethyl sulfoxide) controls with 5 microM Rhd 123 for 1 h, the effects of the antipsychotics on the intracellular accumulation of Rhd 123 were examined using a flow cytometric method.

RESULTS

All the antipsychotics showed various degrees of inhibitory effects on P-gp activity. The rank order of the concentration of inhibitor to cause 50% of the maximal increment of intracellular Rhd 123 fluorescence (EC(50)) was: PSC833 (0.5 microM) < olanzapine (3.9 microM) < chlorpromazine (5.8 microM) < risperidone (6.6 microM) < haloperidol (9.1 microM) < quetiapine (9.8 microM) < 9-OH-risperidone (12.5 microM) < clozapine (30 microM). Considering that the antipsychotics' plasma concentrations are generally lower than 1 microM, the present results suggest that olanzapine and risperidone are the only agents that may inhibit P-gp activity in the BBB. However, most of the antipsychotics are extensively accumulated in tissues. In addition, when given orally, the drug concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract are likely to be high.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic interactions due to inhibition of P-gp activity by the antipsychotics appear possible and warrant further investigation.

Comparison of information on the pharmacokinetic interactions of Ca antagonists in the package inserts from three countries (Japan, USA and UK)

OBJECTIVE

Ca antagonists are one of the most popular classes of drugs used to treat hypertension and angina. These drugs may interact with either CYP3A4 or MDR-1 substrates, with the degree of interaction differing with each drug. We carried out a literature search to examine and compare the extent to which crucial pharmacokinetic (PK) information is included in package inserts (PIs) in Japan, USA and the UK.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search from 1966 to November 2004 was undertaken with the aim of identifying studies on clinical PK drug interactions between seven Ca antagonists that are available in three countries and three CYP3A4 inhibitors (erythromycin, itraconazole and cimetidine), a CYP3A4 inhibitory food, grapefruit juice (GFJ) and the MDR-1 substrate, digoxin. The current PIs for Ca antagonists were obtained from the website of the regulatory authorities or the electronic Medicines Compendium.

RESULTS

Of all possible combinations of seven Ca antagonists with three CYP3A4 inhibitor drugs, drug interaction information was available in the literature on nine combinations: Seven of these were listed in the USA PIs, two in the UK PIs, and none in the Japanese PIs. Interaction studies with GFJ were reported for every Ca antagonist; PIs in the USA provided quantitative data for four of these interactions, whereas UK PIs provided quantitative data for only one of the interactions and Japanese PIs provided no quantitative information. The PK data of co-medication of digoxin with Ca antagonists have been reported for every Ca antagonists. The USA PIs provided quantitative data for five Ca antagonists, whereas the UK PIs provided quantitative data for three Ca antagonists and Japanese PIs provided no quantitative data.

CONCLUSION

The literature search revealed that PIs in the USA provided a great deal of quantitative information on PK interactions between Ca antagonists and other drugs or GFJ. In contrast, PIs in the UK and Japan did not provide sufficient information. We conclude that crucial quantitative information on these drug interactions should be incorporated in PIs, especially in Japan and the UK, as a means of assisting healthcare providers.

P-glycoprotein and bioavailability-implication of polymorphism

P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) may have a significant impact on systemic and tissue/cellular bioavailability of drugs because it functions as an "anti-absorption" mechanism that effluxes drug molecules out of the lipid bilayer and cytoplasm. The ability to reduce bioavailability at the tissue/cellular level was first discovered during the investigation of the causes of multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer chemotherapy. Initially, it was thought that MDR is only caused by P-gp. Recently, many other transporters such as multidrug resistance-related protein (MRP) have also been identified. The ability of P-gp to impact systemic drug bioavailability was only recently recognized. Dr. Alfred Schinkel's group was first to show a significant improvement in the systemic bioavailability of several drugs in the MDR1 knockout mice. The same group also discovered that the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has a very high expression level of P-gp, and that this protein is necessary to restrict the entrance of various drug molecules into the central nervous system (CNS). Polymorphism in the normal human cells has not been reported, but it has been discovered in human cancer cells. Functional implication of P-gp polymorphism in changing the tissue bioavailability has been studied in rodents. These studies strongly support the role of P-gp in restricting tissue bioavailability of anticancer drugs. These studies also support the effectiveness of P-gp in limiting CNS toxicity of the cytotoxic drugs. The functional implication of P-gp on systemic bioavailability is much less well defined in humans, although it appears to be quite obvious in MDR1 knockout mice. Pharmacokinetic models clearly suggest that a change in the absorption rate will have a significant impact on systemic blood level of a drug. However, whether functionally significant polymorphisms of P-gp exist in humans has not been determined. If they do exist, they will surely impact on both systemic bioavailability and drug interaction potentials of many drugs. In the drug development process, several models may be used to select a lead compound that may or may not interact with P-gp, depending on whether the interaction is desirable. Several inhibitors of P-gp are currently on the clinical trial stage. Natural inhibitors of P-gp have also been discovered. There is no doubt that these new developments will have significant impact on the bioavailability of a variety of anticancer and CNS drugs in the next decades.

The interaction of the calcium antagonist RO 40-5967 with digoxin

1. The interaction of the newer calcium antagonist Ro 40-5967 with digoxin was investigated in 42 healthy subjects under steady state conditions. 2. After an adequate loading dose digoxin 0.375 mg once daily was given alone for 1 week. Afterwards three different doses (50, 100, 150 mg daily) of the calcium antagonist Ro 40-5967 were administered to three groups of 14 subjects each for 1 week concurrently with digoxin 0.375 mg daily. 3. Ro 40-5967 led to an increase of mean maximum digoxin plasma concentrations (Cmax) and AUC. For AUC this effect was significantly dose-dependent. 4. Increasing doses of the calcium antagonist led to a stepwise rise of the PQ-time in ECG. 5. A slight fall of heart rate was seen after a 7 day treatment of digoxin alone. This effect was more pronounced when Ro 40-5967 was added to the medication. No significant changes of stroke volume and blood pressure were noted. 6. In conclusion Ro 40-5967 led to a significant elevation of the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of digoxin. This effect was dose-dependent.

Verapamil-digoxin interaction in chronic hemodialysis patients

Verapamil increases the serum-digoxin concentration (SDC) in digoxin treated normals due to a compromised renal and extrarenal clearance. In chronic hemodialysis patients (CHD-patients) treated with digoxin where the renal elimination is diminished, verapamil has been shown to cause substantial increases of SDC with risk of digoxin intoxication. The effect of verapamil treatment on SDC in 8 nearly anephric (Uvol less than 1 l/d) CHD-patients on digoxin treatment was assessed. The patients were continuously treated with verapamil for two periods of two weeks at two dosage levels, 120 mg/d and 240 mg/d, whereafter verapamil was withdrawn. SDC and serum-verapamil were measured weekly. The SDC increased from 1.1 mmol/l to 1.7 mmol/l (p less than 0.05, N = 7) during the first two weeks. Increasing the dose of verapamil to 240 mg/d did not cause a further increment in SDC; on the contrary, the mean SDC decreased. The SDC increments varied between 0 and 200% of baseline values. We conclude that verapamil treatment decreases digoxin clearance in CHD-patients and that the influence of verapamil on SDC in CHD-patients shows great interindividual variation with no close dose dependency and decreases to pretreatment level in 2-3 weeks.

Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the elderly. An update

There are numerous studies of drug handling in the elderly, but it is difficult to assess the significance of changes seen in vitro, or after single-dose administration, because they are often compensated by other mechanisms at steady-state. However, a knowledge of these studies is important as the results alert the investigator to possible treatment problems. The high incidence of adverse drug reaction in the elderly population leaves no doubt that improvements in therapy are needed. Research has been directed at seeking patterns of abnormality in the elderly on which to base recommendations for alterations in dosage regimens. The major shortcoming of this approach has been the failure to distinguish between the effect of chronological age on drug pharmacokinetics, and drug kinetics in elderly people with multiple pathology. The latter concern appreciates the variety of factors involved and the importance of treating each patient as an individual: presentation of mean data is confusing and misleading. The objective of drug treatment in any age group, but particularly in the elderly, is to administer the smallest possible dose which gives adequate therapeutic benefit throughout the entire dosage interval with the minimum of side effects. For most drugs the safe starting dose in the elderly is one-third to half that recommended in the young. Vigilance for potential side effects with plasma concentration monitoring, if available, should help keep toxicity to a minimum. When other medications are added or changed, the possibility of interaction should be anticipated. Methods for individualisation of dosage regimens and the use of sustained-release formulations in the elderly are discussed. Dosage alteration in the elderly in terms of reduced dose frequency, rather than dose size, may help improve compliance. A knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of a drug helps determine which approach will be most beneficial.

Combination therapy with diltiazem and nifedipine in patients with effort angina pectoris

The antianginal effects of diltiazem and nifedipine alone and in combination were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 11 patients (nine men and two women, 57 +/- 8 years old) with stable effort angina. Each patient received placebo, 30 mg of diltiazem, 10 mg of nifedipine, and 30 mg of diltiazem plus 10 mg of nifedipine four times daily for 1 week each. Antianginal efficacy was assessed by means of a treadmill exercise test. The exercise tolerance time was significantly prolonged from 235.1 +/- 52 (placebo period) to 342.2 +/- 101 sec by diltiazem (p less than .01) and to 325.6 +/- 73 sec by nifedipine (p less than .01). The drug combination further prolonged exercise time to 451.1 +/- 103 sec, which was significantly longer than the interval attained with either diltiazem (p less than .01) or nifedipine (p less than .01) alone. The plasma concentration of diltiazem was unaffected by the addition of nifedipine, whereas the plasma nifedipine concentration was significantly increased from 34.8 +/- 11 to 106.4 +/- 37 ng/ml (p less than .001) by the concomitant administration of diltiazem. These data suggest that exercise tolerance in patients with effort angina is increased by the concomitant administration of diltiazem and nifedipine associated with an increase in the nifedipine plasma concentration.

Diltiazem increases steady state digoxin serum levels in patients with cardiac disease

Diltiazem has been reported to decrease or not to affect digoxin elimination. The effects of diltiazem on steady state concentrations of digoxin was evaluated in eleven patients with congestive heart failure receiving this drug for at least two weeks. The mean trough digoxin was 1.11 +/- 0.18 ng/ml before the coadministration of diltiazem (180 mg/day). This concentration increased to 1.54 +/- 0.22 ng/ml after three days and to 1.54 +/- 0.23 ng/ml after seven days of coadministration (P less than 0.01). Clinically, no patient showed signs of digitalis toxicity. Creatinine clearance was unchanged. The present results show that when diltiazem is added to a regimen that includes digoxin, steady state concentrations of this glycoside may increase.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between digoxin and antiarrhythmic agents and calcium channel blocking agents: an appraisal of study methodology

While preliminary screening for interactions between new cardiovascular pharmacotherapeutic agents and digoxin can be efficiently and safely conducted in normal healthy volunteers, it is particularly important to detect and quantify drug interactions in patients with varying degrees of cardiac, hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. Much of the previously published literature provides only minimal data to guide clinical practice because of limitations of study design including sample size and measurement techniques. Important factors that determine the ability of a particular study design to detect a drug interaction with digoxin include the accuracy and precision of the assay method for serum digoxin concentrations, intrasubject and intersubject variability in serum digoxin concentration, and sample size. The format of the trial (chronic versus single digoxin dosing in cardiac patients; chronic versus single digoxin dosing in normal subjects) and the method of assessment of alterations in digoxin handling (formal determination of digoxin clearance, comparison of multiple or single digoxin measurements during various phases of trial) also impact greatly on the clinical relevance of such investigations. Guidelines for future studies of drug interactions with digoxin in cardiac patients are proposed with particular emphasis on laboratory methods; measurement techniques during baseline, placebo, and active drug phases; calculation of the statistical power of the study; time course of the trial; and assessment of the clinical significance of the findings.

Verapamil-induced changes in digoxin kinetics in cirrhosis

The influence of a single low dose of verapamil (80 mg) on the serum levels of digoxin (single dose of 0.5 mg) was studied in 6 patients with hepatic cirrhosis and in 6 healthy volunteer controls. In the cirrhotic patients verapamil increased the peak serum level and the total AUC of digoxin by 98% and 32%, respectively. There was an associated 23% decrease in the renal digoxin clearance. In normal subjects only marginal alterations in digoxin kinetics were observed following verapamil administration. The results indicate that cirrhosis magnifies the influence of verapamil on digoxin kinetics.

Clinical digoxin toxicity in the aged in association with co-administered verapamil. A report of two cases and review of the literature

Digoxin toxicity occurs more commonly in aged than younger individuals. Cardioactive drugs such as quinidine effect digoxin pharmacokinetics so as to increase the potential for digoxin toxicity. The calcium-channel antagonists have become extensively used for cardiac disorders and are often co-administered with digoxin. Despite documented calcium-channel antagonist interactions with digoxin, clinically significant digoxin toxicity associated with their concurrent use is apparently unusual. Two elderly patients receiving digoxin and verapamil simultaneously are presented to demonstrate the clinical importance and potential danger of the concomitant use of these drugs.

Influence of nisoldipine on haemodynamic effects and plasma levels of digoxin

In a placebo controlled double-blind study including 10 patients with heart failure the nisoldipine/digoxin interaction was studied. Nisoldipine was shown to elevate digoxin plasma concentrations significantly by about 15% (trough levels). During chronic combination therapy with nisoldipine trough levels and plasma concentrations 4 h after the morning dose of digoxin were 1.35 +/- 0.14 and 1.92 +/- 0.16 ng ml-1 respectively, whereas they averaged to 1.16 +/- 0.14 and 1.52 +/- 0.16 ng ml-1 with digoxin and placebo (P less than 0.05; mean +/- s.e. mean). Systolic time intervals were significantly altered by nisoldipine co-administration compared with digoxin plus placebo. In certain patients the elevation of digoxin plasma levels due to nisoldipine co-administration could be of clinical relevance.

The influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum digoxin concentrations

A significant drug interaction between verapamil and digoxin, resulting in elevated serum digoxin concentrations, has been well documented in the medical literature. However, a similar interaction between digoxin and the calcium channel blockers nifedipine and diltiazem has not been conclusively established. This study investigated the influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum concentrations of concurrently administered digoxin in eight healthy volunteers. During the control phase of the study, volunteers were administered digoxin 0.25 mg/d for 13 days, and subsequently judged to be at steady state by serial determinations of digoxin serum concentrations. Twenty-four hour urine collections were done for creatinine clearance and urinary digoxin clearance determinations. Phase II of the study involved the addition of diltiazem hydrochloride 30 mg qid to the on-going, daily regimen of digoxin. After 14 days of concomitant therapy, steady-state trough digoxin concentrations were again determined, as well as creatinine clearances and urinary digoxin clearances. This investigation demonstrates that concomitant administration of diltiazem hydrochloride with digoxin results in significantly elevated steady-state trough digoxin concentrations (0.32 +/- 0.07 ng/ml increasing to 0.48 +/- 0.06 ng/ml, p less than 0.01). Urinary digoxin clearance decreased from 223.5 +/- 35.7 ml/min to 153.4 +/- 17.5 ml/min (p less than 0.05). Creatinine clearances were unaltered. A review of the current literature on this topic is included.

Evaluation of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between calcium antagonists and digoxin

Therapeutic uses of calcium antagonists have expanded to include not only ischemic heart disease but arrhythmias, systemic hypertension, congestive heart failure, and various pulmonary and gastrointestinal diseases. Many patients receiving a calcium antagonist concomitantly receive digoxin. Although the potential interaction between these agents has frequently been investigated, literature reports are confusing and inconsistent. We summarized the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of interaction to help clinicians evaluate the potential calcium antagonist-digoxin interaction.

Anaesthetic implications of calcium channel blockers

Clinical uses of calcium channel blockers are expanding. In addition to the established uses in patients with arrhythmias, angina pectoris or hypertension, newer and to some extent investigational uses indicate widespread application. For instance, their use has been reported in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cold cardioplegia, as well as in pulmonary hypertension, antiplatelet therapy, asthma, achalasia and oesophageal spasm, increased intraocular pressure and in cerebral vasospasm. Their use in obstetrical practice has been proposed. Thus, the presentation of a patient who is treated with calcium channel blockers and who requires anaesthesia will become more common. Calcium channel blockers may, under certain circumstances, potentiate haemodynamic and MAC depressive effects of inhalation agents. There is also evidence that the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents may be potentiated. The anaesthetist should be aware that the potential for interactions exists with digoxin, propranolol, quinidine, theophylline or dantrolene. Of interest and some significance are the anaesthetic implications of pathophysiological alterations that can be induced by calcium channel blockers, by affecting lower oesophageal tone, intracranial hypertension, bronchomotor tone (asthma), muscular dystrophy, neuromuscular function, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, malignant hyperthermia, inhibition of platelet aggregation and hyperkalemia. Despite these significant potential anaesthetic implications and because, at this time, in some instances withdrawal has clearly demonstrated increase in the signs of myocardial ischaemia, it would not seem necessary to recommend preoperative discontinuation of calcium channel blocker medication in patients presenting for anaesthesia. It is, however, appropriate that there is a high index of awareness of potential problems, unless there is some modification in inhalation anaesthetic concentrations and neuromuscular blocker dosage. Monitoring of cardiovascular and neuromuscular functions is essential. Calcium channel blockers would appear to be currently the drugs of choice for angina pectoris, arrhythmias or hypertension in patients with associated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between digoxin and other drugs

Drug interactions with digoxin are important because of this agent's narrow therapeutic index. Among the drugs that can decrease digoxin bioavailability are cholestyramine, antacid gels, kaolin-pectate, certain antimicrobial drugs and cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In selected patients, antibiotics may enhance digoxin bioavailability by eliminating intestinal flora that metabolize digoxin. Antiarrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine and amiodarone, can markedly increase steady state serum digoxin levels. Certain calcium channel blocking drugs, particularly verapamil, have a similar effect. Potassium-sparing diuretic drugs, such as spironolactone, can alter digoxin pharmacokinetics. Indomethacin may decrease renal excretion of digoxin in preterm infants. Finally, rifampin, an antibiotic used in the treatment of tuberculosis, may lower steady state serum digoxin levels in patients with severe renal disease. Physicians must maintain constant vigilance whenever medications are added to or withdrawn from a therapeutic regimen that includes digoxin.

Calcium antagonists--drug interactions

Evaluations of drug interactions should be done with caution. One needs to be aware of the reported interactions and apply the information on an individual basis. This review may therefore serve as a guide to the more common drug interactions and when drug therapy should be monitored closely in clinical practice. Major drug interactions with calcium antagonists are summarized in Table 2.