Contribution of the genetic status of oxidative metabolism to variability in the plasma concentrations of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents

The Clinical Significance of the Pharmacogenetics of Cardiovascular Medications

Inter-individual variability in the response to numerous drugs can be traced to a number of sources. One source of variability in drug response is the variability associated with the metabolic capacity of an individual. The component of metabolic capacity that will be the focus of this article is that determined by heredity. Pharmacogenetics is frequently referred to as the study of the effects of heredity on the disposition and response to medications. This article will review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic significance of pharmacogenetics as it pertains to a select number of cardiovascular agents. The enzyme systems responsible for drug metabolism discussed in this article will be limited to the P-450IID6 and N-acetylation pathways. Given the extensive use of cardiovascular agents in clinical practice that are affected by this genetic polymorphism, it is important for the practicing pharmacist to be aware of this phenomenon and its implications. Hopefully, the knowledge gained from this article will help practicing pharmacists to appreciate the clinical significance of polymorphic drug metabolism and provide a basis for the application of this knowledge to a variety of practice settings.

Pharmacogenetics of Antihypertensive Drug Responses

The blood pressure (BP) response to any single antihypertensive drug is characterized by marked interindividual variation, and the known predictors of response are of limited value in identifying the optimum drug for an individual patient. Analysis of genetic variation has the potential to improve our understanding of determinants of antihypertensive drug response in order to individualize drug selection. Genetic variation can influence both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms underlying variation in drug response. Classic pharmacogenetic investigations have identified variations in single genes that have a large effect on antihypertensive drug metabolism and are inherited in a Mendelian fashion. These include a polymorphism in the CYP2D6 gene, encoding a cytochrome p450 family member involved in phase I drug metabolism, and polymorphisms in genes encoding enzymes involved in phase II drug metabolism, including N-acetyltransferase (NAT2), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), and phenol sulfotransferase (P-PST, SULT1A1). Although these polymorphisms have major effects on the pharmacokinetic profiles of both commonly used antihypertensive drugs such as metoprolol (CYP2D6), and lesser used drugs such as hydralazine (NAT2), methyldopa (COMT), and minoxidil (SULT1A1), they have not been shown to influence variation in the antihypertensive effect of these drugs at conventional doses. Interest is now focused on identifying genetic polymorphisms that influence the pharmacodynamic determinants of antihypertensive response. Using a candidate gene approach, such polymorphisms have been identified in genes encoding alpha-adducin (ADD1), subunits of G-proteins (GNB3 and GNAS1), the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor (ADRB1), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3), and components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (angiotensinogen [AGT], angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE], the angiotensin type I receptor [AGTR1], and aldosterone synthase [CYP11B2]). These polymorphisms have been shown to influence the BP response to diuretics (ADD1, GNB3, NOS3, and ACE), beta-blockers (GNAS1 and ADRB1), ACE inhibitors (AGT, ACE, and AGTR1), angiotensin receptor blockers (ACE and CYP11B2), and clonidine (GNB3).An emerging consensus from these studies is that single gene effects on antihypertensive drug responses are small, and even the combined effects of all presently known polymorphisms do not account for enough variation in response to be clinically useful. New genome-wide scanning techniques may lead to the identification of genes previously unsuspected of influencing drug response. Additional requirements for pharmacogenetic approaches to become clinically useful are the characterization of the effects of haplotypes and multi-locus genotypes on drug response, and consideration of gene-by-environment interactions. Such studies will require huge sample sizes and novel statistical methods, but the theoretical and technical framework is in place to make this possible.

Evaluation of cytochrome P450 probe substrates commonly used by the pharmaceutical industry to study in vitro drug interactions

Pharmaceutical industry investigators routinely evaluate the potential for a new drug to modify cytochrome p450 (p450) activities by determining the effect of the drug on in vitro probe reactions that represent activity of specific p450 enzymes. The in vitro findings obtained with one probe substrate are usually extrapolated to the compound's potential to affect all substrates of the same enzyme. Due to this practice, it is important to use the right probe substrate and to conduct the experiment under optimal conditions. Surveys conducted by reviewers in CDER indicated that the most common in vitro probe reactions used by industry investigators include the following: phenacetin O-deethylation for CYP1A2, coumarin 7-hydroxylation for CYP2A6, 7-ethoxy-4-trifluoromethyl coumarin O-dealkylation for CYP2B6, tolbutamide 4'-hydroxylation for CYP2C9, S-mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation for CYP2C19, bufuralol 1'-hydroxylation for CYP2D6, chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation for CYP2E1, and testosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation for CYP3A4. We reviewed the validation information in the literature on these reactions and other frequently used reactions, including caffeine N3-demethylation for CYP1A2, S-mephenytoin N-demethylation for CYP2B6, S-warfarin 7'-hydroxylation for CYP2C9, dextromethorphan O-demethylation for CYP2D6, and midazolam 1'-hydroxylation for CYP3A4. The available information indicates that we need to continue the search for better probe substrates for some enzymes. For CYP3A4-based drug interactions it may be necessary to evaluate two or more probe substrates. In many cases, the probe reaction represents a particular enzyme activity only under specific experimental conditions. Investigators must consider appropriateness of probe substrates and experimental conditions when conducting in vitro drug interaction studies and when extrapolating the results to in vivo situations.

Antihypertensive pharmacogenetics: getting the right drug into the right patient

Pharmacogenetic investigation seeks to identify genetic factors that contribute to interpatient and interdrug variation in responses to antihypertensive drug therapy. Classical studies have characterized single gene polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes that are responsible for large interindividual differences in pharmacokinetic responses to several antihypertensive drugs. Progress is being made using candidate gene and genome scanning approaches to identify and characterize many additional genes influencing pharmacodynamic mechanisms that contribute to interindividual differences in responses to antihypertensive drug therapy. Knowledge of polymorphic variation in these genes will help to predict individual patients' blood pressure responses to antihypertensive drug therapy and may also provide new insights into molecular mechanisms responsible for elevation of blood pressure.

Investigation of xenobiotic metabolism by CYP2D6 and CYP2C19: importance of enantioselective analytical methods

Investigations into the genetic polymorphism of drug metabolism have involved specific models to screen poor and extensive metabolisers of xenobiotics. Debrisoquine, sparteine, S-mephenytoin and dextromethorphan are particularly well known. They have been extensively described in the literature and are used to phenotype human subjects before performing investigations with new drugs which are believed to be under the control of a genetic polymorphism. Dextromethorphan, debrisoquine and sparteine are good substrates for CYP2D6, whereas the S-enantiomer of mephenytoin is a good substrate for CYP2C19, both being two isozymes of cytochrome P-450. In many drugs, the hepatic microsomal oxidative metabolism involving stereogenic centres congregates either with CYP2D6 or with CYP2C19 or, in certain cases, with both of them. The availability of both CYP2D6 from poor and extensive metabolisers and an enantioselective assay would allow genetic polymorphism in drug biotransformation to be investigated in vitro ex vivo at an early stage of drug development before the IND (investigational new drug). Single-dose investigations in vivo can also be performed when only minimal pre-clinical toxicological data are available and produce more reliable results than in vitro studies. This paper focuses on the problem of genetic polymorphism in drug development and specifically discusses some relevant knowledge gained in the last two decades on enantioselective bioassays. Specific examples are given.

Interactions of bupranolol with the polymorphic debrisoquine/sparteine monooxygenase (CYP2D6)

The beta-adrenoceptor blocker bupranolol turned out to be a competitive inhibitor of the polymorphic cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 of which sparteine is a substrate. There was stereo-selectivity of bupranolol involved: (-)-bupranolol was the weakest inhibitor with an apparent Ki value of 1.32 microM, (+)-bupranolol was the most potent with an apparent Ki value of 0.55 microM, while the therapeutically used racemic bupranolol had an intermediate value of 0.88 microM. A 10 min pre-incubation of 5 microM bupranolol with the enzyme preparation prior to the addition of substrate, reduced the inhibition of sparteine metabolism from 52 to about 25%. This suggests that--during these inhibition studies--bupranolol was much more rapidly metabolized than was sparteine, so that the measured Ki values must represent overestimates. The enzyme catalysing bupranolol metabolism was CYP2D6: microsomes from a liver with the genetic enzyme deficiency did not metabolize bupranolol; in microsomes from livers containing the enzyme and 10 microM bupranolol, 5 microM quinidine caused a 72% inhibition of bupranolol metabolism. Although our methods were not sufficiently sensitive to measure the Km of bupranolol directly, it is undoubtedly the beta-adrenoceptor blocker with the highest-known apparent affinity for CYP2D6. High affinity and rapid metabolism are infrequent combinations in enzymology.

Stereo- and regioselectivity of hepatic oxidation in man--effect of the debrisoquine/sparteine phenotype on bufuralol hydroxylation

The influence of the debrisoquine/sparteine-type of oxidation polymorphism on plasma bufuralol concentration and the pattern of urine metabolites was studied in extensive and poor metabolizer subjects. (+)- and (-)-bufuralol, and (+)- and (-)-OH-bufuralol in plasma were determined by enantioselective HPLC, and urinary bufuralol and its metabolites were assayed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Three hours after administration of racemic bufuralol the plasma (-)/(+) isomeric ratio for unchanged bufuralol was 1.84 in extensive metabolizers, indicating preferential clearance of the (+)-isomer through aliphatic 1'-hydroxylation and glucuroconjugation, while the (-)-isomer was mainly eliminated by aromatic 4-hydroxylation. Poor metabolizers were characterized by impaired 1'- and 4-hydroxylation, with almost total abolition of the stereoselectivity of these reactions. The data strongly suggest that both 1'- and 4-hydroxylation are catalyzed by the same enzyme. These in vivo observations are in agreement with recent in vitro data obtained in human liver microsomes from phenotyped patients and support the concept of deficiency of a highly stereoselective cytochrome P-450 isozyme as the cause of this polymorphism.

The polymorphic oxidation of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations

Wide variability in response to some drugs such as debrisoquine can be attributed largely to genetic polymorphism of their oxidative metabolism. Most beta-blockers undergo extensive oxidation. Anecdotal reports of high plasma concentrations of certain beta-blockers in poor metabolisers (PMs) of debrisoquine have claimed that the oxidation of these drugs is under polymorphic control. Subsequently, controlled studies have shown that debrisoquine oxidation phenotype is a major determinant of the metabolism, pharmacokinetics and some of the pharmacological actions of metoprolol, bufuralol, timolol and bopindolol. The poor metaboliser phenotype is associated with increased plasma drug concentrations, a prolongation of elimination half-life and more intense and sustained beta-blockade. Phenotypic differences have also been observed in the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of metoprolol and bufuralol. In vivo and in vitro studies have identified some of the metabolic pathways which are subject to the defect, viz. alpha-hydroxylation and O-demethylation of metoprolol and 1'- and possibly 4- and 6-hydroxylation of bufuralol. In contrast, the overall pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol, which is also extensively oxidised, are not related to debrisoquine polymorphism, although 4'-hydroxypropranolol formation is lower in poor metabolisers. As anticipated, the disposition of atenolol which is eliminated predominantly unchanged by the kidney and in the faeces, is unrelated to debrisoquine phenotype. The clinical significance of impaired elimination of beta-blockers is not clear. If standard doses of beta-blockers are used in poor metabolisers, these subjects may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris.

Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications

The clinical significance of two separate genetic polymorphisms which alter drug metabolism, acetylation and oxidation is discussed, and methods of phenotyping for both acetylator and polymorphic oxidation status are reviewed. Particular reference is made to the dapsone method, which provides a simple means of distinguishing fast and slow - and possibly intermediate - acetylators, and to the sparteine method which allows a clear separation of oxidation phenotypes. Although acetylation polymorphism has been known for some time, definite indications for phenotyping are few. It is doubtful whether acetylator phenotype makes a significant difference to the outcome in most isoniazid treatment regimens, and peripheral neuropathy from isoniazid in slow acetylators is easily overcome by pyridoxine administration. However, in comparison with rapid acetylators, slow acetylators receiving isoniazid have an increased susceptibility to phenytoin toxicity, and perhaps also to carbamazepine toxicity. It is also possible that rapid acetylators receiving isoniazid attain higher serum fluoride concentrations from enflurane and similar anaesthetics than do similarly treated slow acetylators. Thus, when drug interactions of these types are suspected, phenotyping for acetylator status may be advisable. If routine monitoring of serum procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations is practised, phenotyping of subjects prior to therapy with these agents should not be necessary. Although acetylator phenotype influences serum concentrations of hydralazine, when this drug is given in combination with other drugs acetylator phenotype has not been shown to influence the therapeutic response. Slow acetylator phenotype along with female gender and the presence of HLA-DR antigens appear to be risk factors in the development of hydralazine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Determination of acetylator phenotype may therefore help determine susceptibility to this adverse reaction. In the case of sulphasalazine, adult slow acetylators require a lower daily dose of the drug than fast acetylators in order to maintain ulcerative colitis in remission without significant side effects. It is therefore advisable to determine acetylator phenotype prior to sulphasalazine therapy. Work on the association of acetylation polymorphism with various disease states is also reviewed. It is possible that a higher incidence of bladder cancer is associated with slow acetylation phenotype - especially in individuals exposed to high levels of arylamines. The question as to whether idiopathic SLE is more common in slow acetylators remains unresolved. There appears to be no difference between fa

Oxidation phenotype and the metabolism and action of beta-blockers

Variability in response to some drugs such as debrisoquine can be attributed to genetic polymorphism of their oxidative metabolism. Most beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) are extensively metabolised via oxidative routes. Anecdotal reports of high plasma concentrations of certain beta-blockers in poor metabolisers of debrisoquine (PM) have claimed that their oxidation is under polymorphic control. Controlled studies have shown that debrisoquine oxidation phenotype is a major determinant of the metabolism, pharmacokinetics and some of the pharmacological actions of metoprolol, bufuralol and timolol. The PM phenotype is associated with an increased drug bioavailability, a prolongation of elimination half-life and more intense and sustained beta-blockade. Phenotypic differences were also noted in the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of metoprolol. In vivo and in vitro work has identified some of the metabolic pathways which are subject to the defect, namely, the alpha-hydroxylation and the O-dealkylation of metoprolol and the 1'-hydroxylation of bufuralol. In contrast, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol which is also extensively oxidised, are not related to debrisoquine polymorphism, although 4'-hydroxypropranolol formation is lowered in PM subjects. The clinical significance of impaired elimination of beta-blockers is unclear. If standard doses of beta-blockers are used in PM subjects, they may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require lower and less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris.

Effect of oxidative polymorphism (debrisoquine/sparteine type) on hepatic first-pass metabolism of bufuralol

Bufuralol is a beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug whose oxidative metabolism is under the same genetic control as debrisoquine and sparteine. The pharmacokinetics of bufuralol were studied in 10 healthy subjects (7 extensive and 3 poor metabolizers of debrisoquine) after oral and intravenous administration. In extensive metabolizers the systemic availability of bufuralol was 43%. Poor metabolizers were characterized by a considerable increase in systemic availability due to a corresponding decrease in hepatic first-pass metabolism. After oral administration of bufuralol non-linear kinetics may occur.

Interindividual variation of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, plasma concentration and effect: influence of genetic status on behaviour of atenolol, bopindolol and metoprolol

Ten healthy subjects whose genetic oxidative phenotype had been determined (6 extensive and 4 poor metabolizers of the debrisoquine-sparteine type of polymorphism) received single oral doses of 3 beta-blockers: atenolol, bopindolol and metoprolol. The plasma concentrations and the extent of the decrease in exercise-induced tachycardia were determined. The oxidative polymorphism was only significant for substances that had a high hepatic first pass metabolism, such as metoprolol. The metabolic pathway under genetic control was highly stereoselective. This observation must be taken into account when assessing the relation between the plasma concentration and effect of these drugs, which are often administered as racemic mixtures.