Intracardiac electrophysiological effects of lorcainide in man

Newer antiarrhythmic drugs

The effective management of cardiac arrhythmias remains a major challenge in cardiovascular therapeutics. The management of arrhythmias encompasses a wide spectrum of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring in patients with various cardiac diagnoses and different degrees of myocardial dysfunction. A number of the newer antiarrhythmic drugs that have either recently been released or appear promising are reviewed in this article. Drugs are described with respect to their basic pharmacology, electrophysiologic actions, pharmacokinetics and metabolism, hemodynamics, antiarrhythmic effects, side effects, interactions, indications, and dosage.

Pharmacology of lorcainide

Lorcainide is a new type 1 antiarrhythmic drug that is well absorbed orally, with bioavailability increasing with both dose and continued administration. It is metabolized through the liver, and patients with significant liver disease will require dosage reduction. The drug has an active metabolite, norlorcainide, whose activity is similar to that of lorcainide but whose half-life is 26 hours instead of 8 for the parent compound. The levels of this metabolite are nearly twice those of lorcainide at steady state. The long half-life of the metabolite and the changing bioavailability of lorcainide require that a given dose be administered for 1 week for the maximum effect to be demonstrated.

Lorcainide for high-frequency ventricular arrhythmia: preliminary results of a short-term double-blind and placebo-controlled crossover study and long-term follow-up

Lorcainide, 100 mg twice daily was compared with placebo in 39 patients with frequent ventricular arrhythmias in a randomized double-blind crossover trial. A mean frequency of ventricular premature beats (VPBs) of at least 30 VPBs/hour was required during a drug-free period of 48 hours. Holter monitoring and a maximal symptom-limited exercise test were performed at the end of each of the 2-week double-blind treatment phase. The group averaged 350 +/- 361 (standard deviation) VPBs/hour. Lorcainide decreased the mean VPB frequency of the group by 46% (p less than 0.01), with VPB reduction beyond the expected variation in 22 of 39 patients. In 13 patients VPBs were unchanged and in 4 they increased. Eight additional patients responded during drug titration, for an overall response rate of 77% (30 of 39). Lorcainide did not significantly reduce the exercise-related VPB frequency. At 6 months 61% of patients had significant VPB suppression. Thus, lorcainide was effective in reducing the frequency and grade of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias during short- and long-term evaluation.

Lorcainide in patients with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia

Lorcainide, a new antiarrhythmic agent with local anesthetic or membrane-stabilizing properties similar to those of quinidine, was tested in 76 patients with diverse types of heart disease and recurrent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Lorcainide was administered for 72 to 96 hours in a dose ranging from 200 to 400 mg daily. Evaluation of drug efficacy involved ambulatory monitoring and exercise stress testing in 60 patients who had high grade ventricular arrhythmia. Invasive electrophysiologic testing was carried out in the remaining 16 patients who exhibited infrequent ventricular ectopic activity during control studies. Lorcainide was effective in 21 (38%) of 56 patients evaluated for suppression of ventricular ectopic activity and in 6 (40%) of 15 who had invasive testing. In five patients, the drug was discontinued because of toxic reactions. Thus, 27 (38%) of the 71 patients who completed the drug study responded to lorcainide. Side effects, reported by 42 patients (55.3%), consisted primarily of insomnia and gastrointestinal symptoms; 7 experienced aggravation of arrhythmia. Fifteen patients were discharged while receiving lorcainide therapy, but in four the treatment was discontinued after 2 months because of side effects. Three patients died, one suddenly. It is concluded that lorcainide is of value in a small subset of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias who have proven refractory to conventional drugs. Its usefulness is limited by the high frequency of insomnia.

Pharmacodynamics of the initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy with lorcainide

Lorcainide is an antiarrhythmic drug with unusual pharmacokinetics and an active metabolite, norlorcainide, which complicate oral drug loading. In order to characterize the accumulation of lorcainide and norlorcainide and to define the onset of antiarrhythmic action during lorcainide loading, 9 patients with frequent ventricular ectopic beats were studied. During lorcainide loading with 100 mg orally twice daily, frequent ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were monitored and blood samples for drug concentrations were determined. There was a 10-fold range of intersubject variation in plasma concentrations. Despite a half-life of only 8.9 +/- 2.3 hours, lorcainide did not reach steady state until after 4.5 days of therapy. Norlorcainide had a half-life of 26.5 +/- 7.2 hours and was estimated to come to steady state after 7 to 10 days. There was considerable intersubject variation in time of onset of antiarrhythmic response (2 to more than 4.5 days) and a 4- to 5-fold range of intersubject variation in threshold therapeutic plasma concentration (lorcainide 40 to 200 ng/ml, norlorcainide 80 to 300 ng/ml). These observations suggest that lorcainide should be started at low doses and the dose should not be increased more frequently than once a week.

Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral lorcainide in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous lorcainide (2.2 mg/kg) in 10 patients were compared with the electrophysiologic effects of oral lorcainide (mean dose 400 mg/day for 8 days) in 11 patients, all with recurrent ventricular tachycardia that could be induced with programmed stimulation. Intravenous and oral lorcainide resulted in similar prolongation of the QRS, QT, and HV intervals, but only oral lorcainide resulted in prolongation of the AH interval and atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. After both oral and intravenous lorcainide, ventricular tachycardia could still be induced, but the arrhythmia was slower and better tolerated hemodynamically. The mean plasma lorcainide level during a maintenance intravenous infusion was 1254 +/- 662 ng/ml compared with a lorcainide level of 562 +/- 41 ng/ml and a norlorcainide level of 1212 +/- 653 ng/ml after oral dosing. No norlorcainide was detected in plasma after intravenous lorcainide. These data suggest that the short-term electrophysiologic effects of intravenous lorcainide may be different from those of short-term therapy with the oral drug. These differences should be considered during short-term studies of lorcainide.

Electrophysiologic effects of lorcainide on the accessory pathway in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The electrophysiologic effects of lorcainide, a class I antiarrhythmic agent with local anesthetic properties, were studied in 20 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. After intravenous administration of lorcainide (2 mg/kg), the sinus cycle length decreased in all patients from 705 +/- 117 to 636 +/- 94 ms (p less than 0.001). The atrioventricular conduction time lengthened from 84 +/- 22 to 94 +/- 22 ms (p less than 0.01) and the QRS duration increased from 92 +/- 19 to 120 +/- 29 ms (p less than 0.001). The effective refractory period of the atrium increased from 230 +/- 27 to 243 +/- 35 ms (p less than 0.05), whereas the ventricular refractoriness was unaffected. Retrograde conduction over the accessory pathway was blocked in 5 of 18 patients after lorcainide; in the remaining 13 patients a prolongation from 107 +/- 32 to 162 +/- 57 ms (p less than 0.001) was found. Anterograde conduction over the accessory pathway was blocked in 6 patients, and in all other patients it increased considerably. Circus movement tachycardia could be induced in 14 patients before and in 10 patients after the drug. The shortest R-R interval during tachycardia lengthened from 326 +/- 40 to 364 +/- 67 ms (p less than 0.05). The tachycardia zone was unaffected by lorcainide. In 15 patients atrial fibrillation was induced. After lorcainide anterograde conduction during atrial fibrillation was blocked (n = 5). The shortest R-R interval over the accessory pathway during induced atrial fibrillation increased from 228 +/- 35 to 304 +/- 103 ms (p less than 0.05). Intravenous administration of lorcainide produced a pronounced negative dromotropic effect on the conduction properties of the accessory pathway. Lorcainide appears to be a promising new antiarrhythmic agent in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Randomized double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial documenting oral lorcainide efficacy in suppression of symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Lorcainide, a new antiarrhythmic drug, was given to 10 patients with frequent (greater than 1/min) premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) on a baseline 24-hour Holter monitor. Each patient received lorcainide, 100 mg twice daily, and an identical placebo, in a randomized double-blind crossover trial, with 1 week in each treatment period. Before the trial and at the end of each period, routine laboratory, clinical evaluation, 12-lead ECG's, and 24-hour ambulatory ECG recordings were performed. Trough drug plasma concentration measurements were done at the end of each treatment period. All patients had reduction in PVCs, comparing drug to placebo, averaging 82.3 +/- 19.7% (mean +/- SD, p less than 0.01 by Wilcoxin ranked sum), and there was also significant decrease in the number of ventricular pairs and runs. Levels of the major metabolite, norlorcainide, ranged from 34 to 254 ng/ml (mean 160 ng/ml) and exceeded those for lorcainide, range 6 to 169 ng/ml (mean 79 ng/ml). Prolongation of PR, QRS, and QTc intervals was evident during drug therapy, as was decrease in heart rate, but these changes were minimal. The major adverse effect noted was sleep disturbance, which was often initially severe, but improved during the week of therapy.

Electrophysiological effects of lorcainide, a new antiarrhythmic drug. Observations in patients with and without pre-excitation

The electrophysiological effects of the intravenous administration of a new antiarrhythmic drug, lorcainide, were evaluated by programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in 23 patients with atrioventricular conduction disturbances (four patients), ventricular tachycardia (five patients), and accessory atrioventricular pathway (14 patients). Lorcainide did not affect the refractory period of the atrium, ventricle, atrioventricular node, or the AH interval. It lengthened the duration of the HV interval, the refractory period of the accessory pathway, and the width of the QRS complex. The drug terminated ventricular tachycardia in four of five patients. It is concluded that the drug may be of potential benefit in patients with ventricular tachycardia or accessory atrioventricular pathways (especially those with a short refractory period). Lorcainide is contraindicated in patients with bundle-branch block and prolonged HV interval.