Antihypertensive and renal effects of orally administered verapamil

How Do Antihypertensive Drugs Work? Insights from Studies of the Renal Regulation of Arterial Blood Pressure

Though antihypertensive drugs have been in use for many decades, the mechanisms by which they act chronically to reduce blood pressure remain unclear. Over long periods, mean arterial blood pressure must match the perfusion pressure necessary for the kidney to achieve its role in eliminating the daily intake of salt and water. It follows that the kidney is the most likely target for the action of most effective antihypertensive agents used chronically in clinical practice today. Here we review the long-term renal actions of antihypertensive agents in human studies and find three different mechanisms of action for the drugs investigated. (i) Selective vasodilatation of the renal afferent arteriole (prazosin, indoramin, clonidine, moxonidine, α-methyldopa, some Ca(++)-channel blockers, angiotensin-receptor blockers, atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, labetolol, hydrochlorothiazide, and furosemide). (ii) Inhibition of tubular solute reabsorption (propranolol, nadolol, oxprenolol, and indapamide). (iii) A combination of these first two mechanisms (amlodipine, nifedipine and ACE-inhibitors). These findings provide insights into the actions of antihypertensive drugs, and challenge misconceptions about the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of many of the agents.

Hemodynamic effects of verapamil in essential hypertension at rest and during exercise

In recent years the calcium antagonist verapamil has been used in the treatment of essential hypertension. Relatively little work has been done to elucidate its long-term haemodynamic effects at rest and during exercise. Ten males with previously untreated essential hypertension in WHO stage I, aged 35-55 years, were studied on an outpatient basis. Oxygen consumption, heart rate, cardiac output ( Cardiogreen ) and intra-arterial brachial pressure were recorded at rest in the supine and sitting position and during steady state work at 50, 100 and 150 W. As expected, the hypertension was associated with an increase in total peripheral resistance. The subjects were treated with verapamil 120-240 mg daily as the sole drug for one year. The haemodynamic study was then repeated. One subject demonstrated a slight increase in blood pressure at rest and during exercise, while there was a blood pressure reduction in the other 9. The nonresponding patient was excluded from the statistical evaluation. The main results were as follows: There was a statistically significant reduction in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure at rest as well as during exercise. The reductions reached about 10% at rest, slightly less during exercise. The blood pressure reduction was associated with a statistically significant reduction in total peripheral resistance at rest only. During exercise, the reduction in resistance was modest (about 5%). The heart rate was practically unchanged during supine rest, but decreased about 8% at rest sitting and during exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Calcium influx blockers in the treatment of essential hypertension

Elevated vascular resistance is the key factor in most cases of essential hypertension. Vascular resistance is determined by the sarcoplasmatic concentration of free Ca2+. Experimental studies have shown an increased dependence for the noradrenaline-induced contraction on extracellular Ca2+ from the aorta to the small resistance vessels. This is in accordance with the potent vasodilating effect found with Ca2+-influx inhibitors in man. Furthermore, a selective enhancement of the vasodilating response to verapamil has been found in patients with essential hypertension as compared to normotensive subjects. The verapamil-induced vasodilation in the hypertensive patients was positively correlated to plasma adrenaline concentration. These findings suggest accentuated Ca2+-influx dependent vasoconstriction in essential hypertension, which is related to the activity of the sympathetic nervous system. Acute administration of verapamil and nifedipine results in a distinct fall in blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension but not in normotensive subjects. Generally, the percentage fall in blood pressure with Ca2+-channel blockers has been closely positively correlated to the initial blood pressure level and in an open study with 43 patients with essential hypertension the decrease in blood pressure to verapamil was also positively correlated to the age of patients. These data may provide the basis for a new treatment concept for essential hypertension proposing a Ca2+-channel blocker as the first choice for the older patients and a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent as the first line drug for the younger patients. Combined treatment with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent and a Ca2+-channel blocker seems most efficient in normalizing blood pressure in many therapy-resistant hypertensive patients.

Verapamil and propranolol: a comparison of two antihypertensive agents

Verapamil, a calcium antagonist, was compared with propranolol, a widely used beta-adrenoreceptor blocker, in hypertensive patients with respect to its antihypertensive efficacy and incidence and severity of adverse effects. Both drugs caused similar blood pressure reductions without interfering with pulse pressure. The hypotensive effect of verapamil was not accompanied by any effect on heart rate, while after propranolol there was a significant bradycardia. ST-segment and T wave abnormalities at rest and after exercise were partially or completely reverted by both drugs. The incidence and severity of adverse effects was very low and no patient was withdrawn from the study because of complaints due to the active drugs. Verapamil can be compared as antihypertensive drug to the beta-blocker propranolol and this may justify, together with the absence of negative effects on lipids, blood sugar, serum electrolytes and renal function, its use as an antihypertensive drug of first choice.

Antihypertensive effect of verapamil in patients with newly discovered mild to moderate essential hypertension

The antihypertensive effect of verapamil (Isoptin) 120 mg X 3 for four weeks was compared with that of placebo in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over investigation. Twenty patients with newly discovered, not previously treated, mild to moderate essential hypertension were included in the study. Verapamil significantly reduced the diastolic and systolic blood pressure in the supine and standing positions, as well as the heart rate. One patient discontinued the treatment because of rash. Otherwise, only constipation was registered as a side effect of Isoptin. No orthostatic reactions were observed and the PQ-interval was unchanged. Compliance was excellent.

Variability of blood pressure in ambulatory hypertensive patients: effects of verapamil on twice and thrice daily dose regimens

The antihypertensive effects of verapamil over 24 hours were assessed on twice and thrice daily dose regimens on 12 patients (25-65 years of age; mean age 50) with essential hypertension (WHO stages I-II) in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial. After a dose titration period starting with either verapamil 80 mg tid or 120 mg bid the patients kept their maintenance dose (240, 360 or 480 mg daily) for 4 weeks before crossing over to the other administration schedule. Repeated ambulatory blood pressure (BP) curves were recorded in 10 patients with a non-invasive portable device (Pressurometer III, Del Mar Avionics). The BP reductions (causal BP values) obtained by 2- and 3-dose regimens were of similar magnitude (from 170 +/- 19/105 +/- 8 on placebo to 140 +/- 17/87 +/- 7 and to 146 +/- 14/88 +/- 8 by 2-and 3-dose respectively). Analyses of BP curves revealed close similarity in profiles on the two dose regimens, although DBP was significantly (p less than 0.05) lower by 3-dose as compared to 2-dose regimen during the period 0.00-2.59 a.m. Long-term (circadian rhythm) and short-term variability did not differ between the regimens. Despite the slight difference in DBP curves after midnight, the overall impression is that verapamil given both twice and thrice daily provides adequate BP control throughout 24 hours.

Diversity of calcium antagonists

Calcium antagonists (CAs) are widely used in the management of hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris. Currently available CAs fall into three distinct structural classes--the dihydropyridines, the benzothiazepines, and the phenylalkylamines. The diversity of these agents, even among drugs within a structural group, is apparent in their pharmacology, physiologic effects, and therapeutic uses. Traditional CAs produce their effects through blockade of the L-type calcium channel. Recently, a new CA has been developed. Mibefradil, the first member of a new class of CAs, is a tetralol derivative. It is characterized by its selective blockade of T-type calcium channels. It differs from existing CAs and may offer important therapeutic advantages.

Renal effects of the calcium channel blocker aranidipine and its active metabolite in anesthetized dogs and conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats

The purpose of this study was to investigate the renal effects of aranidipine, a novel calcium channel blocker of the dihydropyridine type, and its active metabolite in anesthetized dogs and conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). When infused into the renal artery in anesthetized dogs, aranidipine (0.03 microg/kg/min) induced sustained increases in urine volume and urinary excretion of sodium and of potassium. This effect was greater than that elicited by nifedipine (0.1 microg/kg/min). The aranidipine metabolite, M-1 (0.1 microg/kg/min), also caused diuresis and natriuresis almost equal to those of nifedipine. The stop-flow experiment using the anesthetized dog showed that intrarenal infusion of aranidipine (0.03 microg/kg/min), as well as nifedipine (0.1 microg/kg/min), produced natriuresis at the distal tubular site rather than at the proximal site. Aranidipine (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg), when administered orally, dose-dependently increased urine volume and urinary excretion of electrolytes in conscious saline-loaded SHRs. M-1 (10 mg/kg, p.o.) also showed diuretic and natriuretic effects comparable to those of nifedipine (10 mg/kg) in SHRs. In addition, after repeated oral administration of aranidipine for 7 days, short-term tolerance was not found for its diuretic and natriuretic effects in SHRs. These results suggest that, apart from antihypertensive efficiency, aranidipine may offer a therapeutic advantage by producing diuresis and natriuresis in hypertensive patients. The metabolite of aranidipine may contribute, in part, to the diuretic, natriuretic, and antihypertensive effects of aranidipine.

Antihypertensive efficacy of a once a day verapamil SR/trandolapril combination

Twenty-one patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure between 100 and 114 mmHg after a single-blind 2-week placebo run-in period, started treatment under open conditions with the fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril 180/1 mg o.d. for a period of 8 weeks. Patients whose conventionally measured diastolic blood pressure after 4 weeks' treatment was not normalised (diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) received the higher dosage (verapamil SR/trandolapril 180/2 mg o.d.) for a further 4 weeks. Clinical evaluations including measurement of blood pressure were performed every 2 weeks. A 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed at weeks 0, 4 and 8 (end of the study). The mean office blood pressure decreased from 155 +/- 11/104 +/- 4 mmHg at baseline to 139 +/- 9/89 +/- 6 mmHg at week 8. In 12 patients (60%), the diastolic blood pressure was normalised after week 4. In eight patients, the dosage was increased and, of these, a further 25% were normalised at week 8. Response, defined as a reduction of diastolic blood pressure to < or approximately 90 mmHg (normalisation) or a decrease of at least 10 mmHg compared to baseline, was recorded in 18 patients (90%). The mean 24-h ABPM was reduced from 143 +/- 15/85 +/- 9 mmHg at baseline to 131 +/- 11/77 +/- 8 mmHg at week 8. The average systolic and diastolic blood pressure was reduced by a statistically significant amount (11/9 mmHg) during the day (8.00 am-10.00 pm) and 11/7 mmHg during the night (10.00 pm-8.00 am). Diurnal variation did not change. Only mild to moderate adverse events such as slight isolated elevations of SGPT, SGOT and potassium were observed. Two patients discontinued the study prematurely due to impotence which began during the placebo run-in period. No adverse events were serious or required any medical treatment. The fixed combination of verapamil SR and trandolapril appear to be a very effective and well-tolerated once-a-day antihypertensive medication.

Lack of vasodilatory response in skeletal muscle blood vessels of aged spontaneously hypertensive rats

Regional hemodynamic responses to the vasodilators, hydralazine (1 mg/kg, i.v.) and verapamil (0.1 mg/kg/min, i.v.), were examined in conscious Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), 15 and 50 weeks of age, using the radioactive microsphere method. The flow rates of heart and skeletal muscle in SHR were higher than those in WKY, and the flow rates of liver, kidney, intestines, and skin in SHR were lower than those in WKY. These differences between the regional blood flow in WKY and SHR were observed in both aged and young rats. The changes in organ blood flow induced by hydralazine and verapamil were similar for WKY and SHR in most organs. Both drugs increased the skeletal muscle blood flow in WKY and young SHR, but not in aged SHR, that is, the skeletal muscle blood vessels in aged SHR lost their vasodilatory response. These results suggest that, although a lack of vasodilatory responses in the skeletal muscle vasculature of aged SHR may be triggered by persistent hypertension, the vital organ vasculature maintains its normal vasodilating capacity.

Non-invasive haemodynamic study in hypertensive subjects after treatment with verapamil slow release

Aim of this study is to investigate the haemodynamic effects, after the short and long-term antihypertensive treatment. After a wash-out period and a placebo treatment period, 30 hypertensive patients received verapamil SR (slow release, 240 mg o.d.) for 30 days. A significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was obtained already 4 h after the first administration of verapamil; it was more evident and persistent throughout the study. No significant changes of heart rate or PR interval in ECG were observed. A significant decrease in total vascular resistances, both supine and upright, was evident already 4 h after the drug intake and observed throughout the study. The major effect was obtained after one month. No significant changes of cardiac output, cardiac index and stroke volume were recorded. Furthermore, plasma verapamil levels were measured to confirm that the haemodynamic effects are obtained by low drug concentrations. The present study provides evidence that the antihypertensive effect of verapamil, whose mechanism is the reduction of total vascular resistances, is progressive, long acting and achieved by low plasma levels, when slow release formulation is considered.

Diabetic rat aorta responsiveness to D600 and nifedipine

1. The responsiveness of aortic rings from 4 and 12 week streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats to D600 (Gallopamil) and nifedipine was studied. 2. The sensitivity and responsiveness to D600 were significantly enhanced (P < 0.05; 5-test, ANOVA; 9 d.f.) only in the 4 week diabetic preparations precontracted with noradrenaline. 3. Nifedipine-induced relaxations were significantly enhanced (P < 0.05-0.01; t-test, ANOVA; 8-12 d.f.) in all the diabetic (4 and 12 weeks) aortic preparations precontracted with both noradrenaline (10(-7) mol/L) and KCl (40 mmol/L) when compared with controls. 4. D600, unlike nifedipine, did not produce significant relaxation of diabetic aortic preparations precontracted with KCl (40 mmol/L) at both week 4 and 12 of the disease when compared with controls. 5. These results suggest that there is differential responsiveness of streptozotocin diabetic rat aorta to D600 and nifedipine.

Natriuretic effect of calcium-channel blockers in hypertensives

This double-blind, randomized, crossover trial characterizes the acute natriuretic response to calcium-channel blockers (CCB) and investigates the role of hemodynamic and hormonal factors in mediating the natriuresis. Thirteen male subjects with essential hypertension received a single oral 20-mg dose of nifedipine or 120 mg of diltiazem. Renal functional and hemodynamic measurements were performed prior to and hourly for 4 hours following medication. Subjects then received these medications for 4 weeks at which time the above studies were repeated. Urinary sodium excretion increased within 60 minutes of CCB administration and the natriuresis was sustained for 4 hours. Cumulative sodium loss during the 4 hours of study was greater with nifedipine (43 +/- 12 mmol) than with diltiazem (18 +/- 6 mmol) (P less than 0.05). Despite natriuresis, urinary potassium excretion was decreased by both agents. Even though both drugs decreased the mean arterial pressure, inulin and paraaminohippurate (PAH) clearances were not altered. Plasma aldosterone concentrations decreased, plasma catecholamine concentrations increased, whereas plasma-renin activity was unchanged with both drugs. Body weight, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow, plasma-renin activity, plasma aldosterone, and catecholamine concentrations were unchanged following 4 weeks of therapy. The acute natriuretic response after 4 weeks of therapy was similar to the response noted after the first dose. This study concludes that CCB are acutely natriuretic. Despite systemic hypotension, renal hemodynamics are unaltered during CCB therapy. Suppression of aldosterone as well as direct tubular effects of these drugs may mediate the natriuresis. Chronic therapy with CCB does not modify the acute natriuretic response to these agents.

Impact of age, race, and obesity on hypertensive mechanisms and therapy

Despite the demonstrated efficacy of traditional antihypertensive therapy in reducing blood pressure, hypertension continues to be a major cause of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Stepped-care therapy is a nonphysiologic approach that, due to potential metabolic derangements and stimulation of undesirable reflex responses, may not substantially reduce the cardiovascular and renal complications associated with hypertension or improve long-term survival in many hypertensive patients. Because of fundamental hemodynamic differences related to the age, race, and weight of hypertensive patients, drug treatment often elicits varying responses. Certain classes of drugs are not only more effective but also more appropriate from a physiologic standpoint in specific types of patients. Therapy selection based in part on hemodynamic mechanisms and demographic patterns is a more rational approach to patient management and may contribute to a better overall outcome than has been observed with conventional treatment.

Verapamil 240 SR versus verapamil 120 SR in arterial hypertension. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Fifteen patients (6 males, 9 females), age range 36-70 years, were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study according to a Latin-square design, with the aim of comparing 24-hour blood pressure profiles after three 15-day treatment periods with placebo, verapamil SR 120 mg (V120 SR) given twice daily (bid), and verapamil SR 240 mg (V240 SR) given once daily (od). All of the patients were diagnosed as mild or moderate essential hypertensives on the basis of standard casual recordings. Noninvasive 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was performed with an ICR Spacelab 5200 automatic device. In comparison with placebo, a clinically and statistically significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP over 24 hours was obtained with both active treatments. Comparison of the two active treatments shows that V240 SR led to a greater reduction in systolic and diastolic BP than V120 SR. No changes in heart rate were observed. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, both verapamil regimens proved to be effective and safe in treating essential hypertensives, with V240 SR giving better 24-hour BP control.

Effects of calcium antagonists on the hypertensive kidney

This review focuses on the effects of calcium antagonists on renal function in hypertensive human subjects. Specifically assessed are the acute and chronic effects of diltiazem, verapamil, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, and nitrendipine on glomerular filtration rate; effective renal plasma flow/renal blood flow; renal vascular resistance; and urinary protein excretion. Among the calcium antagonists, only the dihydropyridine derivatives have been demonstrated consistently to acutely increase effective renal plasma flow/renal blood flow. The acute effects on glomerular filtration rate are variable. With respect to chronic therapy, many of the calcium antagonists have been reported to produce sustained increases in the effective renal plasma flow/renal blood flow and/or the glomerular filtration rate. Renal vascular resistance is reduced. Although calcium antagonists preserve or improve renal perfusion and glomerular filtration, long-term clinical trials are required to determine their potential therapeutic benefit to modify the natural course of hypertensive renal disease.

Long-term therapy with slow-release nifedipine in essential hypertension

The purpose of this study, designed as an open multicenter trial, was to test the antihypertensive efficacy, patient acceptability, and side effects of long-term treatment with slow-release nifedipine in a large population. The drug was studied in 330 outpatients with essential hypertension, WHO stage 1-2, recruited in 20 hospital centers. After washout period was completed, nifedipine (20 mg bid) was given for 1 month (phase 1). Then, the treatment was extended for 4 months (phase 2) with variable doses (range 20-80 mg daily). No other antihypertensive drugs were administered during phase 1. However diuretics, beta blockers, or captopril were added to nifedipine during phase 2 in 11 patients. Seventy patients did not meet criteria for inclusion at washout. During phase 1 and 2, 66 additional patients were excluded due to side effects, the need of other antihypertensive drugs, or non-compliance. Systolic blood pressure significantly lowered (10% or more) in 84% patients in phase 1 and in 76% in phase 2. No responders were 6.1% and 3.6%, respectively. Diastolic blood pressure was normalized in 60% of patients after 5 months of therapy. Effects on blood pressure were equal in young patients and in the elderly, but a minimal rise in heart rate was recorded in younger patients. At least one side effect occurred in 46.6% patients, mainly headache (15.4%), hot flashes (13.3%), ankle edema (12.8%), or palpitation (6.6%). Sixteen patients (8.2%) were obliged to stop nifedipine treatment due to the severity of the side effects. This trial confirms the efficacy of nifedipine in hypertension, both in young and in aged patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of verapamil and carbon monoxide on blood pressure and heart mass in the spontaneously hypertensive rat

Studies were carried out to examine the relationship between blood pressure lowering using the Ca2+ channel blocker verapamil, and regression of ventricular hypertrophy, in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). Untreated male SHR showed rapidly developing hypertension (systolic pressure 194 +/- 2 mm Hg, 109 days of age) and moderate ventricular hypertrophy. Verapamil (Calan-SR, G.D. Searle Co.) treatment for 30 days at maximum doses of 18.7 and 49.9 mg/kg per day supplied in the food, lowered blood pressure maximally 37 mm Hg. The drug had no effect on heart rate. Decrease in the mass of the left ventricle plus interventricular septum was positively correlated with the verapamil-induced decrease in blood pressure (r = 0.69, P less than 0.001). SHR exposed continuously to 500 ppm carbon monoxide (CO) for 30 days showed a similar decrease in blood pressure (33.0 mm Hg). Such SHR, however, displayed increases in mass of the left ventricle plus septum and right ventricle, and of hematocrit, nearly identical to same age Sprague-Dawley rats similarly exposed to CO. Neither verapamil nor CO treatment altered myocardial water content. The results suggest that a modest lowering of blood pressure with verapamil in the SHR produces a relatively rapid decrease in left ventricular mass. It also shows that even when afterload is reduced in the SHR, as with CO, substantial ventricular hypertrophy develops, probably because of augmented preload, and that it is comparable to that produced in non-hypertensive rats.

Effect of nifedipine on urinary concentrating ability: a placebo controlled study

A placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study was conducted to assess a possible effect of a dihydropyridine Ca-entry blocker, nifedipine, on urinary concentration ability in nine healthy men under a water-deprivated condition. Placebo and nifedipine (20 mg) were orally administered on two separate occasions, at least one week apart, after the urinary osmolarity was stabilized. Urinary osmolarity, osmolar clearance, negative free water clearance, urine volume, urinary solutes (Na, K and urea), creatinine clearance and plasma vasopressin (AVP) were measured during the postdose 3-hour period and compared with those during the respective predose (baseline) period. Urinary osmolarity decreased by nifedipine from 1047.2 +/- 34.4 to 873.0 +/- 38.3 mOsm/kg (mean +/- SEM) at 2 hours postdose (P less than 0.05). Mean % decrease in urinary osmolarity at 1 to 3 hours after nifedipine was significantly (P less than 0.01) greater than after placebo. Urine volume significantly (P less than 0.01) increased from the baseline of 0.49 +/- 0.06 to 1.1 +/- 0.15 ml/min at 2 hours after nifedipine. Relationship between osmolar clearance and negative free water clearance relative to glomerular filtration rate observed during the postnifedipine phase was significantly (P less than 0.01) shifted downward compared with that derived from the pooled data unrelated to nifedipine dosing. No significant drug effect was detected on plasma AVP. Both placebo and nifedipine dosed during the continued water deprivation and stabilized urinary osmolarity condition caused an increase in the urinary excretions of solutes. The results indicate that nifedipine inhibits urinary concentration. This does not appear to be due to the inhibition of AVP secretion from the hypophysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension

Although verapamil is a well-established treatment for angina, cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies, this review reflects current interest in calcium antagonists as anti-hypertensive agents by focusing on the role of verapamil in hypertension. Verapamil is a phenylalkylamine derivative which antagonises calcium influx through the slow channels of vascular smooth muscle and cardiac cell membranes. By reducing intracellular free calcium concentrations, verapamil causes coronary and peripheral vasodilation and depresses myocardial contractility and electrical activity in the atrioventricular and sinoatrial nodes. Verapamil is well suited for the management of essential hypertension since it produces generalised systemic vasodilation resulting in a marked reduction in systemic vascular resistance and, consequently, blood pressure. Evidence from clinical studies supports the role of oral verapamil as an effective and well-tolerated first-line treatment for the management of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clinical studies have shown that verapamil is more effective the higher the pretreatment blood pressure and some authors have found a more pronounced antihypertensive effect in older patients or in patients with low plasma renin activity. Sustained release verapamil formulations are available for oral administration which, as a single daily dose, are as effective in lowering blood pressure over 24 hours as equivalent doses of conventional verapamil formulations given 3 times daily. As a first-line antihypertensive agent, oral verapamil is equivalent to several other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other vasodilators, and is not associated with many of the common adverse effects of these treatments. Verapamil may be preferred as an alternative first-line antihypertensive treatment to diuretics in elderly patients because it has similar efficacy in these patients without causing the adverse effects commonly linked with diuretic treatment. Furthermore, because verapamil does not cause bronchoconstriction, it may be used in preference to beta-blockers in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive airway disease. Reflex tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension or development of tolerance is not evident following verapamil administration. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients refractory to established antihypertensive regimens, verapamil produces marked blood pressure reductions when combined with diuretics and/or ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers and vasodilators such as prazosin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Calcium channel antagonism and beta blockade in combination--a therapeutic alternative in cardiovascular disorders. A review

Calcium-channel antagonists and beta-adrenergic blocking agents have become important modalities in the cardiovascular therapeutic armamentarium. These drugs are often administered as monotherapy to a wide range of cardiological patients with angina pectoris, hypertension, arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and other diseases. Since within each class these drugs exhibit pharmacologic differences, it follows that their effectiveness varies in different disease states and that they exhibit a wide variety of side effects. In an attempt to optimize therapy, the individual drugs from these two classes can be combined; and the efficaciousness and side-effect profile of various combinations between calcium-channel antagonists and beta blockers are discussed in this review. Recommendations as to which patients may benefit from a combination and as to which patients may be harmed by the combination therapy will be made. Very few studies have compared the safety and efficacy of a single agent with the combination and with placebo in a controlled randomized fashion. To determine which therapy is superior and to determine which combination one should recommend under what circumstances, such placebo-controlled, randomized trials are a necessity, and will hopefully be performed although the complexity is enormous.

Renal and hemodynamic effects of isradipine in essential hypertension

Twenty-three men with essential hypertension participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study with a crossover design to evaluate the long-term (nine weeks) effects of isradipine on central and renal hemodynamics. Isradipine as monotherapy was titrated from 2.5 to 5 and then to 7.5 mg twice daily. At the end of the crossover periods, cardiac output (dye-dilution) and intraarterial blood pressure were assessed. Compared with placebo, isradipine reduced ambulatory blood pressure from 174/104 to 154/91 (p less than 0.001), whereas the heart rate was unchanged. The reduction of blood pressure was entirely due to a reduction (36 percent; p less than 0.001) of the peripheral resistance. The baroreceptor sensitivity did not change (RR intervals during infusion of phenylephrine) but, with isradipine, the setpoint was shifted to lower blood pressure levels. Renal plasma flow (para-amino hippurate clearance) increased (465 versus 391 ml/minute; p less than 0.05), but glomerular filtration rate ([51Cr]ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance) did not change. Hence, the filtration fraction decreased. With isradipine, there was a post-dose increase in natriuresis (0.45 to 0.34 mmol/minute; p = 0.06). Side effects were mild.

Increase of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels after sublingual administration of nifedipine in essentially hypertensive patients

To see whether the acute natriuretic effect of nifedipine is accompanied by changes in atrial natriuretic peptide levels, a group of eight hypertensive patients were studied. After at least a week of constant sodium intake, placebo or nifedipine (10 mg s.I.) were administered and blood pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and atrial natriuretic peptide plasma levels, urinary sodium, urinary volume and creatinine clearance were monitored for 2 hours. While placebo did not induce changes in any of the above parameters, nifedipine administration was followed by a significant decrease in blood pressure and an increase in urinary sodium, urinary volume and creatinine clearance; these changes were accompanied by a significant rise in atrial natriuretic peptide levels from 19.4 +/- 2.8 pg/ml to a maximum of 23.9 +/- 2.5 pg/ml and 24.1 +/- 2.2 pg/ml (P less than 0.05) at 60 and 90 minutes, respectively. In conclusion, our data do not rule out the possibility that atrial natriuretic peptide participates in the nifedipine-induced increase in sodium and water excretion.

Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring after a single dose of sustained-release verapamil

The antihypertensive effect of a single dose of 240 mg sustained-release (S-R) verapamil was investigated by ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring in 13 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Following a 2-week washout period, 24-hour BP monitoring was carried out with a Spacelabs ICR 5300 device following random administration of a tablet of S-R verapamil or placebo; BP recording was repeated after crossover 3 to 7 days later. Average whole-day systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly lower after verapamil (130.1 +/- 2.6/87.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg) than after placebo (142.1 +/- 3.3/95.8 +/- 2.1 mmHg) (p less than 0.01). Mean waking BP was 146.4 +/- 3.6/99.1 +/- 2.2 mmHg after placebo and 135.2 +/- 3.3/90.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg after verapamil (p less than 0.01); during sleeping hours BP was 133.8 +/- 3.1/88.7 +/- 2.6 mmHg following placebo and 122.2 +/- 2.3/80.9 +/- 1.8 mmHg following verapamil (p less than 0.01). Blood pressure profile was significantly reduced by verapamil up to 20 hours after tablet administration, while from 21 to 24 hours after drug intake BP values were similar to placebo. Response to verapamil was not correlated to the pretreatment BP values and to the patient's age. In summary, this study suggests that acute administration of 240 mg S-R verapamil in hypertensive patients produces a BP reduction during 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods. The hypotensive efficacy is preserved for many hours after tablet intake and seems to be due to individual variation in cardiovascular reactivity to the drug.

Monotherapy of hypertension with darodipine: a new calcium-channel blocker

Calcium-channel blockers are increasingly used as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Following three weeks of single-blind placebo therapy, 43 patients with essential hypertension were randomized into four groups. Group 1 (10 patients) received placebo twice a day, Group 2 (13 patients) received darodipine (PY 108-068) 50 mg twice a day, Group 3 (9 patients) received darodipine 100 mg twice a day, and Group 4 (11 patients) received darodipine 150 mg twice a day. Patients were seen in the clinic weekly for 4 weeks. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were done on each patient. Darodipine caused a sustained decrease in the supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p less than .001) and there were no significant pressure differences between the three drug dosages. The effects of the drug on heart rate were not consistent. Placebo had no effect on either blood pressure or heart rate. Side effects were few, mild, and consisted of headaches and peripheral edema, and did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug. No metabolic abnormalities were seen with either low or high doses of the drug. We conclude that: (1) darodipine is effective, safe, and well tolerated; (2) its antihypertensive effectiveness is similar at high and low doses, although the higher doses seemed to have a slightly greater effect on the diastolic arterial pressure; (3) the low dose may be preferable since side effects were dose related.

Effects of nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem on renal function

Eight healthy female volunteers were given single doses of nifedipine 10 mg, verapamil 80 mg, diltiazem 120 mg or placebo on 4 different study days. Urine and sodium output increased after all four drugs, but the increase after nifedipine was significantly greater than after verapamil or placebo. Nifedipine caused a significant increase in heart rate; none of the drugs caused any change in blood pressure. Potassium excretion, creatinine clearance, free water clearance and plasma renin activity did not change with any drug. The mechanism of the natriuresis and diuresis has still to be elucidated.

Calcium channel blockers in systemic hypertension

Alterations in transmembrane flux of calcium ions may be playing a role in the pathophysiology of systemic hypertension. Calcium channel blockers have been shown to be effective antihypertensive drugs with excellent safety profiles. They are efficacious in the long term treatment of systemic hypertension in all population subgroups, and have special applicability for treating patients with hypertensive urgencies and individuals with concomitant diseases such as angina pectoris and arrhythmias.

Hormonal and metabolic effects of calcium channel antagonists in man

Calcium is a component of many metabolic reactions. By blocking calcium transport across cell membranes, calcium channel antagonists can therefore theoretically affect numerous metabolic and hormonal processes. In vitro studies have often documented just such an effect. Because of the expanding use and prevalence of calcium antagonists in clinical practice, a review of their in vivo effects on hormones and metabolism is warranted. The effect on glucoregulatory hormones, calcium regulatory hormones, anterior and posterior pituitary secretion, the renin-angiotensin axis, plasma catecholamines, and plasma lipids and lipoproteins is herein reviewed. The various calcium antagonists, by virtue of their distinct chemical structures, influence metabolism in their own unique manner. Despite the widespread involvement of calcium in hormone action, however, calcium channel antagonists have little dramatic impact on hormone regulation. This is, in part, due to the drug dosage used in clinical practice and to the inherent compensatory mechanisms built into normal endocrine function. The development of agents with greater and more potent metabolic specificity, however, coupled with the ability to target drug action, holds promise for expanded therapeutic application in the future.

Calcium antagonists and their potential for antihypertensive therapy

Calcium antagonists are potent arterial vasodilators devoid of relevant chronic sympathetic reflex activation and sodium and volume retention. This favorable hemodynamic profile of action renders them suitable for monotherapy of hypertension where they act to reduce an enhanced, calcium-influx-dependent vasoconstrictor mechanism which may be brought about by altered smooth muscle cation handling and increased intracellular free calcium concentrations. Clinical studies have proved their efficacy, safety, and good tolerability alone or in combination with other drugs in uncomplicated hypertension where they are particularly effective in older and low-renin and possibly black patients. These properties and their efficacy in the treatment of severe and accelerated hypertension or hypertensive emergencies make them a valuable addition to already available drug therapy.

Additive competitive interaction of verapamil and quinidine at alpha-adrenergic receptors of isolated cardiac guinea pig myocytes and human platelets

Recent clinical work has questioned the safety of a combined therapy of oral quinidine and intravenous verapamil, because some patients were reported to react with severe hypotension probably due to drug interactions with vascular alpha-adrenergic receptors. In order to obtain further quantitative information on the underlying mechanism, we used the radioligands (3H)-prazosin and (3H)-yohimbine to perform binding studies on intact cells, with predominantly alpha-1 (isolated myocytes) or alpha-2 subtypes (human platelets) of adrenergic receptors. Our studies confirm that both verapamil and quinidine possess a distinct alpha-adrenergic receptor blocking activity and do not discriminate between the alpha-1 and alpha-2 subtype (Ki-values were between 0.24-0.28 mumol/l for alpha-1 receptors and 0.49-0.50 mumol/l for alpha-2 receptors). Their interaction was competitive and in the presence of both drugs inhibition of radioligand binding was additive. The alpha-adrenergic blockade by verapamil was stereospecific as D-verapamil increased the dissociation constant of the radioligand to a much lesser degree than L-verapamil (Ki = 1.67 +/- 0.29 mumol/l for D-verapamil). The calcium channel blocker nitrendipine, a 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative, did not show any competition up to concentrations of 10 mumol/l. Our results thus give evidence that verapamil and quinidine have already at therapeutic blood levels significant alpha-adrenergic blocking activities which may be of clinical interest. In addition our results show that adult cardiac myocytes are very well suited for pharmacological adrenergic interaction studies.

Multiple effects of calcium entry blockers on renal function in hypertension

Characterization of the renal effects of calcium entry blockers has not been easy because the inhibition of Ca2+ cellular influx alters several regulatory functions. The ability of calcium blockers to dilate renal vasculature and to increase glomerular filtration rate is largely determined by the preexisting vascular tone. However, the increments in sodium excretion could occur without alterations in renal hemodynamics. Calcium blockers could increase sodium excretion by inducing a redistribution of renal blood flow toward juxtamedullary nephrons, by inhibiting tubuloglomerular feedback responses, or by a direct action on the tubular transport of sodium. These effects are poorly understood at present. In vitro studies show that the blockade of calcium entry enhances renin secretion and decreases prostaglandin synthesis. This dissociation has not been found during long-term administration, which has been proved to be effective for the treatment of essential hypertension with normal maintenance of renal function. In this respect, there are reports indicating that calcium blockers are particularly effective in a subgroup of patients with essential hypertension who exhibit subtle but detectable alterations in calcium metabolism. Further studies are needed to determine whether this significant response to calcium blockers is due to correction of an early defect of calcium cellular kinetics that initiated the increase in blood pressure.

Cardiovascular effects of verapamil in patients with essential hypertension

The cardiovascular effects of intravenous verapamil and 3 months of oral administration of a slow-release form of verapamil (verapamil-SR) were studied in 10 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Intravenous verapamil reduced arterial pressure by 15% (p less than .01) through a fall in total peripheral resistance of 29% (p less than .01); provoked a reflexive rise in heart rate (by 19%, p less than .02), cardiac output (by 74%, p less than .01), and plasma catecholamines; and shifted intravascular volume toward the cardiopulmonary circulation indicating peripheral venoconstriction. Quite in contrast to the immediate effects of the intravenous drug, oral therapy with verapamil-SR for 2 to 3 months lowered arterial pressure effectively (by 15%, p less than .01) by inducing vasodilation of 15% (p less than .02), but without causing reflex tachycardia, activation of the sympathetic-adrenergic or renin-angiotensin systems, or volume expansion. Oral therapy with verapamil-SR preserved systemic and renal blood flow and slightly reduced cardiac mass (by 6%, p less than .05) and renal vascular resistance (by 25%, p less than .05). Whereas intravenous verapamil tended to depress myocardial contractility, oral verapamil-SR did not at all affect myocardial contractility or left ventricular function. These cardiovascular effects make verapamil-SR an excellent agent for long-term antihypertensive therapy.

Plasma immunoreactive atrial natriuretic factor is inhibited by selective blockade of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats

Effects of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors and calcium channel blockade on basal and clonidine-stimulated immunoreactive atrial natriuretic factor (IR-ANF) in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats were evaluated. Clonidine was injected intravenously (i.v.) in a dose of 50 micrograms. Yohimbine and verapamil were used as a pretreatment, with clonidine in a dose of 50 micrograms and 0.5 mg respectively. The effects of yohimbine (1, 20, 50 micrograms) and verapamil (0.5 mg) on basal IR-ANF were also studied. Plasma IR-ANF was measured by radioimmunoassay with prior extraction on heat-activated Vycor glass. Clonidine injection in a dose of 50 micrograms caused a marked increase of plasma IR-ANF from 34.0 +/- 7.0 pg/ml (mean +/- S.E.M.) to 457.1 +/- 66.3 pg/ml. Clonidine-stimulated ANF secretion was partially inhibited by yohimbine from 457.1 +/- 66.3 pg/ml (mean +/- S.E.M.) to 99.9 +/- 23.1 pg/ml. Moreover, yohimbine in highest doses (50 micrograms) decreased the basal plasma IR-ANF from 34.0 +/- 7.0 pg/ml (means +/- S.E.M.) to 6.8 +/- 3.6 pg/ml. Verapamil did not alter basal and clonidine stimulated IR-ANF. These results indicate the important role played by alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in mediating ANF release.

Protective effect of verapamil on ischaemic renal injury in dogs

Three groups of female mongrel dogs were used. In each dog right nephrectomy was performed. In the first group, 60-min complete occlusion of the left renal artery was followed by 50.4% reduction in RBF (P less than 0.05), 53.4% reduction in GFR (P less than 0.01) and 46.7% reduction in urine flow rate (UV) (P less than 0.05). These haemodynamic changes were accompanied by a significant (P less than 0.01) increase in urinary enzyme activity. In the second group, following Verapamil 0.5 mg/kg i.v. bolus, there was diuresis and natriuresis, urine flow rate (UV) increased by 39% and UNaV by 60% (P greater than 0.05); there were no changes in RBF or GFR. In the third group, pretreatment with Verapamil prior to the arterial occlusion modified the deleterious effects of the 60-min renal ischaemia. RBF decreased by 9.4%, GFR by 28.5% and UV by 11.1% (P greater than 0.05); there was no change in the urinary enzyme activity. It is concluded that Verapamil can protect against ischaemic renal damage.

Role of calcium antagonists in systemic hypertension

Despite the physiologic rationale of their use in hypertension, traditional vasodilators such as hydralazine and minoxidil are often relegated to the second and, more often, to the third and fourth steps of step-care programs. Although they are powerful blood pressure-lowering agents, they cause tachycardia, excessive renin stimulation and sodium retention, and cannot be used as the only antihypertensive agent. The characteristics of the antihypertensive action of calcium antagonists make them suitable for monotherapy. Indeed, all calcium antagonists, while effectively lowering blood pressure through vasodilation, either do not affect heart rate (verapamil and its analogs) or cause a moderate and transient heart rate increase (dihydropyridine compounds). Dihydropyridines also possess a natriuretic effect, probably due to inhibition of tubular sodium transport. The natriuretic effect is evident during the first 2 days of administration, but a small negative sodium balance persists for at least 1 week. There is no increase in body weight or fluid volumes with long-term administration of calcium antagonists with a marked acute natriuretic response, such as dihydropyridines, and those antagonists with a very moderate immediate natriuretic response, such as verapamil. All calcium antagonists, therefore, appear capable of preventing the sodium and water retention that vasodilatation would otherwise entail. More liberal step-care guidelines are now possible to find the agent most suitable for the individual patient. In these guidelines, calcium antagonists, as well as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, are considered as possible first-choice agents along with diuretics and beta blockers.

Short- and long-term effects of calcium entry blockers on the kidney

The renal effects of the calcium entry-blocking drugs diltiazem, nifedipine, nitrendipine, nicardipine and verapamil are reviewed. Although nifedipine may acutely increase plasma renin activity, most of the calcium entry blockers have no sustained effect on any of the components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Although all of the calcium entry blockers effectively lower blood pressure, none adversely affects renal function: Glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow are maintained. Diltiazem may increase glomerular filtration rate via attenuation of the intrarenal effects of angiotensin II or norepinephrine. Although all of the calcium entry blockers acutely increase salt and water excretion, most of the calcium entry blockers have no clinically sustained effect on salt and water excretion; serum electrolytes, urinary sodium and potassium excretion, body fluid composition and body weight are usually unchanged. Calcium entry blockers can be expected to assume a prominent role in the treatment of hypertension because of their ability to lower blood pressure while preserving renal perfusion and function.

Renal effects of nicardipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension

We studied the renal effects of nicardipine, a calcium entry blocker, in seven patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow (RBF) were measured by means of thiosulfate and para-aminohippurate, respectively. Intravenous administration of nicardipine hydrochloride (0.5 mg) increased RBF by 26.8 +/- 5.8% (mean +/- SEM, p less than 0.01), GFR by 35.4 +/- 12.4% (p less than 0.05), and urinary excretion of sodium by 56.4 +/- 10.7% (p less than 0.05) with a significant (p less than 0.01) reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure as compared to control values. Nicardipine decreased total renal vascular resistance by 30.0 +/- 3.2% (p less than 0.05) from the control value, while filtration fraction remained unchanged. Our results indicate that nicardipine has several favorable renal effects with a concomitant hypotensive action in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

Calcium channel blockers and treatment of hypertension

Over the past years, research efforts have been focused on the pathophysiologic role of calcium ions, and the implication for the potential role of calcium channel blockers in the management of essential hypertension. Numerous studies have shown that nifedipine and verapamil are effective antihypertensive agents, initial experience with diltiazem is also encouraging. The magnitude of blood pressure reduction with these drugs is related to the pre-treatment blood pressure. In refractory hypertension, combination with other antihypertensive agents provide additive effect. In the elderly population and in patients with ischemic heart disease, supraventricular arrhythmia, bronchospastic disease, peripheral vascular disease or diabetes mellitus, the calcium channel blockers offer potential advantages over other antihypertensive agents. Experimental studies also suggest that these drugs may reverse ventricular hypertrophy. When long-term safety with these drugs is documented from well-controlled clinical trials, the calcium channel blockers may be our first line of therapy for the management of hypertension.

Verapamil-induced secretion of active and inactive renin in conscious sheep

Regulation of plasma active and inactive renin was investigated using conscious sheep with indwelling artery, vein and bladder catheters. Control and experimental studies were carried out in the same animals on different days. The calcium antagonist drug verapamil was given as an initial bolus injection (0.5 mg/kg) followed by a continuous infusion (0.1 mg/kg per h) over a 2.5 h period. Plasma active and inactive renin changed in parallel. Both were significantly increased within 15 min of the initial drug dose and both attained a peak increase after 45 min. Thereafter, the two forms of renin returned to basal levels despite continued infusion of the drug. Effective renal plasma flow (CPAH) was also transiently increased by verapamil and followed a similar time course to changes in plasma active and inactive renin concentration. Arterial blood pressure, however, remained suppressed by verapamil for the duration of the study. Verapamil did not alter urine flow or sodium and potassium excretion rates. These results are discussed in relation to the possible link between intrarenal haemodynamics and renin secretion in conscious and in anaesthetized animals and also in relation to the concept that variation in the relative amounts of active and inactive renin secreted in differing physiological situations represents a mechanism for regulating the renin-angiotensin system.

Pharmacokinetics of verapamil in patients with hypertension

Twelve hypertensive patients (WHO Stage I-II) were given oral verapamil (Isoptin) b.d. or t.d.s. as long-term treatment. The pharmacokinetics of verapamil and norverapamil were studied both after single and b.d. and t.d.s. doses of verapamil 240, 360 or 480 mg daily adjusted according to the blood pressure response. The apparent oral clearance of verapamil was decreased after both the twice and thrice daily dosage regimens (1.38 and 1.841/min, respectively) as compared to the single dose (4.391/min). The plasma half-life of verapamil was increased from 3.34 h (single dose) to 4.65 h (b.i.d.). Decreased elimination of norverapamil was also found after multiple doses of verapamil, as shown by an increase in the adjusted AUC of norverapamil (adjusted to a verapamil dose of 80 mg), namely from 574.9 h X ng X ml-1 (single dose) to 1172 h X ng X ml-1 (b.d.) and to 841 h X ng X ml-1 (t.d.s.). The plasma half-life of norverapamil increase from 5.68 h to 7.34 h during twice daily dosing. During thrice daily verapamil, no increase in plasma half-life was found either for verapamil or norverapamil, probably due to the relatively short sampling time (6 h). The plasma concentration of verapamil and the reduction in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure were correlated. The mean decrease in supine systolic blood pressure was 5.8 mm Hg per 100 ng verapamil/ml plasma, and for diastolic pressure 2.9 mm Hg per 100 ng verapamil/ml plasma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twice-daily verapamil for hypertension: a comparison with propranolol

Recent reports have confirmed that some slow calcium channel inhibitors have useful antihypertensive properties because they produce dilatation of the peripheral arterioles without reflex tachycardia. Verapamil is such a drug, but its clinical role in the management of hypertension is not clear. An open crossover trial was performed to compare the 24-hour profiles of blood pressure reduction after long-term therapy with a standard beta-adrenoceptor blocker, propranolol, and verapamil. Nineteen patients were studied by continuous ambulatory intraarterial recording and the order of drug administration was determined by random allocation. The drugs were administered 2 times a day and titrated according to casual clinic pressures (propranolol, 40 to 240 mg 2 times a day; verapamil, 120 to 240 mg 2 times a day). Mean hourly blood pressure and heart rate values were obtained over a 24-hour cycle and the responses to isometric and dynamic exercise were also examined. The drugs produced a uniform and comparable reduction in blood pressure throughout the day, together with a reduction in heart rate, which was greater with propranolol. Comparable effects were also seen on the pressor responses to exercise. Both drugs were equally well tolerated and caused no patient withdrawals. Thus, oral verapamil given 2 times a day shows a degree of efficacy similar to that of propranolol and provides 24-hour blood pressure control. This slow calcium channel inhibitor was well tolerated and may be used as initial therapy for hypertension.

Calcium antagonists and beta blockers in the control of mild to moderate systemic hypertension, with particular reference to verapamil and propranolol

The antianginal and antiarrhythmic role of calcium antagonists is well established. Recent preliminary studies have indicated that, like beta blockers, calcium antagonists may produce short- and long-term hypotensive effects in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The pharmacologic properties of calcium antagonists provide a clear rationale for their use in the control of essential hypertension. The comparative hypotensive effects of verapamil (80 to 160 mg 3 times a day) and propranolol (40 to 120 mg 3 times a day) were evaluated over 4 weeks, preceded by a 4-week placebo phase, in a double-blind protocol in 17 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Verapamil (n = 10) reduced the mean sitting systolic blood pressure by 10.7% (p less than 0.01) and standing by 7.6% (p less than 0.04). The corresponding data for propranolol (n = 7) were 4.8% (not significant) and 5% (p = 0.04). Verapamil reduced the sitting diastolic blood pressure by 10.8% (p less than 0.01), propranolol by 7.5% (p = 0.01); the standing diastolic blood pressure was reduced by 10.7% with verapamil (p less than 0.01) and by 8.6% (p = 0.01) with propranolol. With verapamil the mean heart rate fell from 77.60 +/- 8.42 to 70.20 +/- 4.85 beats/min (p = 0.03); with propranolol it fell from 76.85 +/- 6.91 to 66.29 +/- 4.54 beats/min (p less than 0.01). Although a trend towards a slightly greater hypotensive effect was apparent with verapamil compared with propranolol, the difference was not statistically significant. It is concluded that verapamil and propranolol exert comparable hypotensive potency in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

A multicenter study of verapamil in systemic hypertension in Thailand

The antihypertensive effect and possible adverse effects of verapamil were assessed in 30 Thai patients with mild to moderate hypertension. All patients had normal blood chemistry evaluations and electrocardiograms. After a 4-week placebo period, 80 mg of verapamil was given 2 times a day for 8 weeks. Blood pressure and pulse rate were recorded both in supine and standing positions every 2 weeks. Verapamil decreased blood pressure significantly both in supine and standing positions. The pulse rate was not significantly affected. The most common adverse effect was constipation. No vivid dreams or breathlessness were reported. The blood chemistry and electrocardiograms at the end of the study period were not significantly changed. It is concluded that verapamil reduces blood pressure in mild to moderate hypertensive Thai patients.