Effects of chlordiazepoxide training dose on the mixed agonist-antagonist properties of benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788, in a drug discrimination procedure

Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review

Drug discrimination has been an important technique in behavioural pharmacology for at least 40 years. The characteristics of drug-produced discriminative stimuli are influenced by behavioural and pharmacological variables, including the doses used to establish discriminations. This review covers studies on the effects of varying the training dose of a drug in a search for general principles that are applicable across different drug classes and methodological approaches. With respect to quantitative changes, relationships between training dose and the rate of acquisition or magnitude of stimulus control were found for most drug classes. Acquisition accelerated with dose up to a point beyond which drug-induced impairments of performance had a deleterious impact. Sensitivity to the training drug as measured by ED(50) values typically increased when the training dose was reduced. Qualitative changes were more complex and appeared to fall into three categories: (a) changes in profiles of generalization between partial and full agonists; (b) reduced specificity of some discriminations at small training doses; and (c) changes in the relative salience of actions mediated through different neurotransmitter systems or from central and peripheral sites. Three-lever discrimination procedures incorporating 'drug versus drug' or 'dose versus dose' contingencies enabled detection of more subtle differences than the simple 'drug versus no drug' approach when applied to the opioid, hallucinogen and barbiturate classes of drugs. These conclusions have implications for the interpretation of data from studies that use either within-subject or between-subject designs for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs.

Antagonism of the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, pentobarbital, and midazolam in cynomolgus monkeys reveals involvement of specific GABA(A) receptor subtypes

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol were studied by comparing the potency of ethyl-8-azido-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazol(1,5-a)benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate (Ro15-4513) and ethyl 8-fluoro-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazol(1,5-a)-benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate (flumazenil, Ro15-1788) to antagonize ethanol, pentobarbital (PB), and midazolam substitution for ethanol. Ro15-4513 has high affinity for receptors containing alpha(4/6) and alpha(5) subunits and lower affinity for alpha(1), alpha(2), and alpha(3) subunits. Flumazenil is nonselective for GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(1), alpha(2), alpha(3), and alpha(5) subunits and has low affinity for alpha(4/6)-containing receptors. Male (n = 9) and female (n = 8) cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.0 or 2.0 g/kg i.g., 30-min pretreatment) from water. Ethanol, PB, and midazolam dose-dependently substituted for ethanol (80% ethanol-appropriate responding). Ro15-4513 (0.003-0.56 mg/kg i.m., 5-min pretreatment) shifted the ethanol, PB, and midazolam dose-response functions rightward in a vast majority of monkeys tested (15/15, 16/17, and 11/12, respectively). In contrast, flumazenil (0.30-10.0 mg/kg i.m., 5-min pretreatment) shifted the ethanol, PB, and midazolam dose-response functions rightward in 9 of 16, 12 of 16, and 7 of 9 monkeys tested, respectively. In the monkeys showing antagonism with both Ro15-4513 and flumazenil, ethanol and PB substitution were antagonized more potently by Ro15-4513 than by flumazenil, whereas midazolam substitution was antagonized with similar potency. There were no sex or training dose differences, with the exception that flumazenil failed to antagonize ethanol substitution in males trained to discriminate 2.0 g/kg ethanol. GABA(A) receptors with high affinity for Ro15-4513 (i.e., containing alpha(4/6) and alpha(5) subunits) may be particularly important mediators of the multiple discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol through GABA(A) receptor systems.

Discriminative stimulus effects of flumazenil: perceptual masking by baclofen, and lack of substitution with gamma-hydroxybutyrate and its precursors 1,4-butanediol and gamma-butyrolactone

Pigeons trained to discriminate 0.1 mg/kg flumazenil, proposed as an in-vivo model to study interactions with diazepam-insensitive gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptors, were tested with various GABAergic and non-GABAergic compounds. As a result of its pharmacological selectivity, the model was suitable for further examining previously reported flumazenil-like effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). Flumazenil and the GABAA negative modulator Ro 15-4513 produced 82-100% flumazenil-appropriate responding. Diazepam and the direct-acting GABAA agonists muscimol and 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridine-3-ol (THIP) produced 38-64% flumazenil-appropriate responding. GHB, its precursors 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), and the GABAB agonists baclofen and SKF97541 produced 0-24% flumazenil-appropriate responding. Baclofen shifted the flumazenil dose-response curve to the right and down, possibly involving perceptual masking of the discriminative stimulus effects of flumazenil by agonist activity at GABAB receptors. These masking effects of baclofen were blocked by the GABAB antagonist CGP35348. When CGP35348 was given together with GHB to block its GABAB agonist effects, GHB did not produce flumazenil-appropriate responding. Conceivably, effects of GHB at non-GABAB receptors (e.g. diazepam-sensitive GABAA receptors and GHB receptors) may interfere with the expression of its flumazenil-like discriminative stimulus effects. The asymmetric substitution between GHB and flumazenil is consistent with the hypothesis that the discriminative stimulus effects of GHB consist of several components, not all of which are mimicked by flumazenil.

The inability of CCK to block (or CCK antagonists to substitute for) the stimulus effects of chlordiazepoxide

To further examine the relationship between cholecystokinin (CCK) and GABA, the present study assessed the ability of the CCK-A antagonist devazepide and the CCK-B antagonist L-365,260 to substitute for the stimulus effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDP), as well as the ability of CCK-8s to block these effects, in female Long-Evans rats within the conditioned taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning. Both devazepide and L-365,260 failed to substitute for the discriminative stimulus properties of CDP, and CCK-8s failed to block its stimulus effects. The benzodiazepine diazepam did substitute for, and the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil did block, the stimulus effects of CDP. This suggests that the lack of substitution for, or antagonism of, CDP by the CCK antagonists and CCK-8s, respectively, was not due to the inability of the present design to assess such effects. Possible bases for the current findings, e.g., necessity of an anxiogenic baseline, drug and receptor specificity, as well as the dose-response nature of the interaction, were discussed. Given that a relationship between CCK and GABA has been reported in other designs, the present results suggest that such a relationship may be preparation specific.

Effects of training dose on the relationship between discriminative-stimulus and self-reported drug effects of d-amphetamine in humans

The aim of the present experiment was to examine the relationship between the discriminative-stimulus and self-reported effects of drugs in humans. To accomplish this aim, nine healthy adult volunteers (four females, five males) were trained to discriminate between placebo and 10 mg d-amphetamine (low-dose group) or 20 mg d-amphetamine (high-dose group). After acquiring the placebo-amphetamine discrimination, a range of doses of d-amphetamine (1.25-20 mg) was tested to determine if they shared discriminative stimulus effects with the training dose. Participants in the low-dose group exhibited a significant leftward shift in the dose-response function for discrimination performance, which is concordant with previous preclinical and human drug discrimination studies that assessed the effects of training dose. Consistent with the drug discrimination findings, participants in the low-dose group exhibited a significant leftward shift in the dose-response function for several self-reported drug effects (e.g., Like the Drug and Stimulated). However, several other self-reported drug effect items were not significantly influenced by training condition (e.g., Anxious/Nervous and Bad Effects). These results suggest that the discriminative-stimulus and self-reported drug effects of d-amphetamine overlap, but are not isomorphic. Furthermore, these results illustrate that behavioral history significantly influences subsequent drug effects in humans.

High-dose discrimination training with midazolam: context determines generalization profile

In previous work, greater differentiation among ligands for the benzodiazepine site was found in rats trained to discriminate among vehicle, 0.32, and 3.2 mg/kg midazolam than in animals trained to discriminate a single midazolam dose from vehicle (i.e., virtually all test drugs occasioned low-dose midazolam-appropriate responding, but most did not occasion high-dose midazolam-appropriate responding even at high test doses). A possibility was that merely training with 3.2 mg/kg-midazolam (not previously studied) would result in greater selectivity than training with lower midazolam doses. In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg i.p. midazolam from no drug under a two-lever, food-maintained, procedure; and drugs from the previous three-lever studies were tested. Triazolam, bretazenil, clonazepam, lorazepam, midazolam, zolpidem, chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital, and flurazepam all dose-dependently occasioned >80% responding on the midazolam-appropriate lever in roughly that order of potency. Only triazolam had occasioned midazolam 3.2 mg/kg-appropriate responding in the previous work. The greater differentiation among these drugs in the dose-vs.-dose procedure likely was due to a training dose context rather than to the high training dose per se.

Blockade of behavioral effects of bretazenil by flumazenil and ZK 93,426 in pigeons

Benzodiazepine receptor partial agonists manifest full efficacy in preclinical tests of anxiolytic drug action but do not fully reproduce the discriminative stimulus effects of benzodiazepine receptor full agonists in pigeons. The partial agonist, bretazenil, binds to both diazepam-sensitive and diazepam-insensitive GABAA receptors. Previous studies have suggested a role for each of these receptor populations in some behavioral effects of bretazenil in pigeons. A possible role for these receptor subtypes in the behavioral effects of bretazenil was further investigated through drug interaction studies with the benzodiazepine receptor antagonists, flumazenil and ZK 93,426. Whereas flumazenil binds with high affinity to both receptor isoforms, ZK 93,426 binds preferentially to diazepam-sensitive binding sites. Bretazenil markedly increased punished responding of pigeons without significantly affecting nonpunished responding. In pigeons discriminating the full benzodiazepine receptor agonist, midazolam, from saline, bretazenil produced only 60-75% maximal effect. Flumazenil and ZK 93,426 neither increased punished responding nor substituted for midazolam, but dose-dependently blocked the effects of bretazenil on punished responding. Flumazenil also dose-dependently blocked the effects of bretazenil in midazolam-discriminating pigeons, whereas ZK 93,426 only attenuated this effect. These results indicate that bretazenil's actions as a partial agonist at diazepam-sensitive benzodiazepine receptors mediate increases in punished responding and substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam in pigeons. The differences in the effects of flumazenil and ZK 93,426 on the discriminative stimulus effects of bretazenil suggest a potential contribution of diazepam-insensitive sites to this behavioral effect.

Reversal of overshadowing in a drug mixture discrimination in rats

Previous studies have suggested that in some circumstances, learning processes such as overshadowing may determine the effects that one drug has upon the response to another. The experiments described here examined overshadowing in rats trained to discriminate mixtures of nicotine plus midazolam in two-lever operant procedures with food reinforcement. After training for 60 sessions, midazolam (0.32 mg/kg SC) overshadowed nicotine (0.32 mg/kg SC) so that the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine seen in control rats trained with nicotine alone was abolished (n = 8-10). In the next phase of the study, the discriminative response to midazolam in one group of mixture-trained rats was devalued by means of an extinction procedure which weakened the relationship between administration of midazolam and the response that was reinforced. Dose-response determinations then showed that the devaluation procedure had indeed attenuated the response to midazolam, whereas the previously overshadowed response to nicotine was restored. Post-session injections of drugs were used to equate the pharmacological histories of the groups and the effects seen were therefore attributable to training with the drugs and not simply to repeated exposure to them. Additionally, in the control rats trained with nicotine only (with midazolam given post-session), midazolam markedly reduced response rates, whereas in the three groups of rats trained with the mixture, midazolam had little response rate-depressant effect; this observation suggests that behaviourally contingent tolerance had developed to the response rate-reducing effect of midazolam. Application of devaluation procedures in studies of the discriminative stimulus effects of single drugs with multiple effects may provide a means for manipulating the characteristics of the discriminations obtained and for identifying individual elements of the drug-produced stimulus complex.

Effects of several benzodiazepines, alone and in combination with flumazenil, in rhesus monkeys trained to discriminate pentobarbital from saline

The purpose of the present study was to further investigate the relationship between the DS effects of PB and those of benzodiazepines (BZs) and to begin to collect pharmacological information concerning receptor mechanisms involved in this behavioral effect of BZs. Rhesus monkeys (n = 3), trained to discriminate pentobarbital (PB; 10 mg/kg, IG) from saline under a discrete-trials shock avoidance procedure, were given IG diazepam (0.3-10 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (1.0-30 mg/kg), or etizolam (0.3-10 mg/kg) alone and in combination with flumazenil (0.01-1.7 mg/kg, IM). Flumazenil was administered 10 min prior to the administration of saline, PB or the BZs. All three BZs fully substituted for PB in all monkeys. Diazepam was the most potent with a mean ED50 of 0.81 mg/kg (SEM = 0.04) while chlordiazepoxide was the least potent (mean ED50 = 5.78 mg/kg, SEM = 1.22 mg/kg). The ED50 for etizolam was 1.22 mg/kg (SEM = 0.37 mg/kg). Pretreatment with flumazenil (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) resulted in a dose-related parallel shift to the right in the dose-response function for PB-appropriate responding in all monkeys for all three BZs. The mean (n = 3) pKB value with 0.1 mg/kg flumazenil was 6.51 (SEM = 0.42) for diazepam and 6.57 (SEM = 0.17) for chlordiazepoxide. This value could not be calculated for etizolam because only one monkey was tested with 0.1 mg/kg flumazenil. However, the mean pKB for etizolam considering all monkeys and all doses of flumazenil was 6.58 (SEM = 0.47). Apparent pA2 values for flumazenil with diazepam were 6.02 for one monkey and 7.11 for another. All three BZs tended to increase average latency to respond. Apparent pKB and pA2 analysis may prove useful for elucidating receptor mechanisms involved in the behavioral effects of BZs.

Empirical evidence that the state dependence and drug discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes

The study compared the outcomes generated by the State Dependence and Drug Discrimination paradigms with ethanol in the rat. Food-deprived rats learned to complete a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of bar presses for food within 120 s while treated with 320- to 1250-mg/kg doses of ethanol. Subsequent tests of recall of this response with saline failed to generate any evidence that transfer was hampered following the drug-to-saline state change. In contrast, each of 14 rats learned to discriminate 1250 mg/kg ethanol from saline in a Drug Discrimination procedure that also required the animals to press one of two levers for food according to a fixed- ratio 10 schedule. The results offer the first empirical evidence to demonstrate directly that the State Dependence and Drug Discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes in otherwise identical experimental conditions.

Discriminative stimulus effects of melatonin in the rat

To provide initial information on the potential mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus effects of melatonin, rats were trained to discriminate melatonin (150 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-choice discrete-trial avoidance paradigm. Stimulus generalization curves for melatonin were steep; complete generalization with melatonin occurred at 100-150 mg/kg. Triazolam generalized completely with melatonin (n = 7). Flurazepam generalized completely with melatonin in only two out of six rats; however, partial generalization was produced in the remaining four animals. The melatonin-appropriate responding produced by triazolam was antagonized completely (in six out of seven rats) by 0.3-10 mg/kg flumazenil (Ro 15-1788). In contrast, the dose of flumazenil sufficient to block completely the melatonin-like discriminative effects of triazolam failed to block the stimulus effects of the training dose of melatonin. Pentobarbital produced primarily melatonin-appropriate responding, with complete generalization with melatonin in five out of seven rats. Diphenhydramine generalized completely with melatonin in two out of seven rats; however, little or no partial generalization was observed in the remaining five rats. These results suggest that melatonin may produce its discriminative effects through sites on the GABAA-benzodiazepine receptor complex distinct from the benzodiazepine binding sites.

Neurobiological mechanisms controlling aggression: preclinical developments for pharmacotherapeutic interventions

Current pharmacotherapeutic approaches to the management of violent and aggressive behavior rely mostly on agents that act as receptor agonists or antagonists at subtypes of brain dopaminergic, GABAergic, and serotonergic receptors. Ethological experimental studies in animals have shown that drugs may modulate aggression by inhibiting motor activity, by distorting aggression-provoking or -inhibiting signals, by fragmenting behavioral sequences or temporal patterning, or by increasing the rate and intensity of aggressive acts. Evidence from animal studies points to large changes in selected brain dopamine, serotonin, and GABA systems during and following aggressive and defensive behavior. However, the specificity of drugs that are currently used to control aggressive behavior through their action as agonists or antagonists at subtypes of dopamine, serotonin or GABA receptors continues to be of concern. Similar to the effects of widely used traditional neuroleptics that nonselectively antagonize dopamine receptors, the range of behaviors which is suppressed by either D1 or D2 receptor antagonists is pervasive. At present, systemic administration of dopamine receptor antagonists in animal preparations does not target aggression-specific mechanisms. The GABAA/Benzodiazepine/Chloride ionophore receptor complex is implicated in the aggression-heightening effects of alcohol and benzodiazepines. Although early reports focused on the "taming" effects of benzodiazepine anxiolytics, low doses may enhance aggression in both animals and humans. Benzodiazepine antagonists block heightened aggression after low doses of alcohol or benzodiazepines. Agonists at certain 5-HT1 receptor subtypes such as eltoprazine are potently effective in reducing aggressive behavior of males and females of various animal species under conditions that promote charging offensive-type aggression, without adversely affecting nonaggressive components of the behavioral repertoire. However, recent reports indicate that eltoprazine and related compounds may potentiate anxiety reactions in rodents, and question the behavioral specificity of these substances. Opioid receptor antagonists modulate primarily physiological and behavioral responses of defense and submission. Defeated animals show tolerance to opiate analgesia and withdrawal responses upon challenge with opioid receptor antagonists. Defensive and submissive vocalizations are potently blocked by opioid peptides. Substances that target specific receptor subtypes at serotonergic, GABAergic and opioidergic synapses are most promising for the selective modification of aggressive, defensive and submissive behavior patterns.

Discriminative stimulus properties of RU 33965, a benzodiazepine receptor weak partial inverse agonist

Rats were trained to discriminate the low-efficacy benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist RU 33965 from vehicle in a two-lever discrimination task on a fixed ratio (FR) 20 schedule. Consistent discrimination was obtained at 0.5 mg/kg PO RU 33965. Both leptazol and stronger inverse agonists (FG7142, S-135, RU 34000) substituted for the cue. The weak inverse agonists/antagonists RU 33094, RU 34030, Ro 15-1788, and ZK 93426 also substituted for the cue with the latter two compounds being particularly potent. The agonist and partial agonists diazepam, RU 33203, and RU 39419 did not substitute for the RU 33965 cue but RU 39419 antagonised it. The full agonists diazepam and loprazolam only consistently antagonised the cue when given IP 5 min pretest. These data suggest that the RU 33965 cue results from its weak inverse agonist activity at benzodiazepine receptors, but kinetic factors must be considered when interpreting drug effects in discrimination studies.

Assessment of the stimulus properties of anxiolytic drugs by means of the conditioned taste aversion procedure

The conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure has recently been described as a more rapid alternative to two-lever operant procedures in drug discrimination research. We trained different groups of rats to discriminate the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 20 mg/kg) or the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (0.4 mg/kg) from saline by means of the CTA procedure. The results were in agreement with findings from two-lever operant drug discrimination procedures. However, discrimination training took 40 sessions in the case of CDP and 72 sessions for 8-OH-DPAT, which is comparable to results obtained with two-lever operant procedures. Dose-response curves were determined and generalization tests were performed for different benzodiazepine and nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics. Baseline behavior deteriorated in the course of generalization and substitution testing, thus preventing further generalization testing. Our experience is that the use of the CTA procedure in drug discrimination research does not have sufficient advantages over traditionally used procedures to replace the latter.

Discriminated taste aversion with chlordiazepoxide

Discriminative stimulus effects have been studied extensively with the two-response, food-reinforced operant procedure and more recently also with discriminated taste aversion (DTA) procedures. DTA procedures have the advantage of a more rapid discrimination training. However, the test phase, i.e., drug substitution, of the DTA procedure is more time consuming (1 test per 4 days) than the test phase of the two-response procedure (2 tests per 5 days). The present study investigated whether a DTA procedure with 2 tests per 5 days could be implemented. In addition, the specificity of the DTA procedure was investigated. Rats were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 20 mg/kg, IP) from vehicle using a discriminated taste aversion procedure. Selective suppression of saccharin consumption after CDP injections was maximal after seven CDP-LiCl pairings. In subsequent substitution tests, with 2 tests per 5 days, CDP-mimicking effects were found only for another benzodiazepine, diazepam, and for a barbiturate, pentobarbital. The results indicate that rats can be rapidly trained to discriminate CDP from vehicle in the discriminated taste aversion procedure and that the CDP-cue so produced has the same specificity as in a two-response, food-reinforced operant procedure. However, the DTA procedure has a number of drawbacks that make its advantage over the two-response procedure questionable.

Proconflict effect of ACTH1-24: interaction with benzodiazepines

The intracerebroventricular injection of ACTH1-24 (0.1-10 micrograms) produced a dose-dependent decrease of punished licking periods in the conflict test in rats. The same treatment failed to modify unpunished behavior. A similar effect was produced by alpha-MSH (0.25-5 micrograms), whereas ACTH4-10 and ACTH11-24 were ineffective in doses up to 10 micrograms. The proconflict effect of ACTH1-24 was completely antagonized by diazepam (1.5 mg/kg IP) and partially by the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788 (5 mg/kg IP). The results are in line with a possible "anxiogenic" action of ACTH1-24.

Characterisation of the discriminative stimulus properties of flumazenil

Rats were trained to discriminate flumazenil (15 mg/kg i.p.) from vehicle in a two-lever, food-reinforced, operant conditioning procedure. Substitution tests were performed with a wide dose range of flumazenil and of several benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine compounds possessing behavioural effects similar to or opposite to those of benzodiazepine agonists. The results indicate that low doses of flumazenil have behavioural effects, that the flumazenil cue has a low degree of specificity and is most strongly related to the stimulus properties of benzodiazepines.

Drug discrimination models in anxiety and depression

Drug discrimination is a technique for investigating the stimulus properties of centrally active drugs. Although many studies have employed animals to investigate the stimulus properties of substances used clinically for the treatment of anxiety and depression, it would be a mistake to consider the internal discriminative stimuli as being related specifically to the anxiolytic or antidepressant properties of these drugs. Rather drug cues are better considered as relating to the pharmacological action of classes of compounds. Thus, benzodiazepine cues generalize to other compounds acting at benzodiazepine receptors, but not to substances (anxiolytic or otherwise) acting at 5-HT1A receptors. Similarly, antidepressants with different pharmacological properties, for example the tricyclic imipramine, or the phenylaminoketone buproprion produce distinct, unrelated discriminative stimuli. For this reason, the limits of drug discrimination techniques for investigating novel anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs should be clearly recognized. Attempts to identify an anxiogenic discriminative stimulus using pentylenetetrazole have also been misguided. In this technique it has proven difficult to separate unequivocally the pharmacological proconvulsant effects of the drug from the psychological construct anxiety. Nevertheless, drug discrimination remains a valuable technique for investigating pharmacological interactions in animals and man.

Discriminative stimulus properties of CL218872 and chlordiazepoxide in the rat

Rats were trained to discriminate either CL218872 (5 mg/kg PO) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg PO) from vehicle in a 2-lever discrimination task on an FR20 schedule. The discriminative cues produced by these two drugs generalised to a range of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and partial agonists. Nitrazepam, diazepam, RU32698 and RU32514 were less potent in substituting for the CL218872 cue than the chloridiazepoxide cue. Zopiclone, RU31719 and RU43028 substituted for both cues with similar potency, whilst zolpidem and CL218872 were clearly more potent in substituting for the CL218872 cue. Chlordiazepoxide substituted only partially for the CL218872 cue, even at doses which decreased the rate of responding. CGS9896 substituted partially for both cues, but was less effective with the CL218872 cue. RU39419 substituted for the chlordiazepoxide cue, but antagonised the CL218872 cue. CGS8216 and FG7142 antagonised both cues. The contributions of benzodiazepine receptor subtypes or partial agonism to the generation of the CL218872 cue is discussed.

Discriminative stimulus properties of midazolam: comparison with other benzodiazepines

Rats (N = 12) were trained to discriminate midazolam (1 mg/kg, IP) from vehicle in a food reinforced operant conditioning procedure. Midazolam, flunitrazepam, diazepam, chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital showed dose-dependent substitution for midazolam. Buspirone and Ro 15-1788 did not substitute for midazolam. The midazolam cue was dose-dependently antagonized by Ro 15-1788. In rats (N = 12) trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (3 mg/kg, IP) from vehicle midazolam, flunitrazepam, diazepam and chlordiazepoxide substituted completely and dose dependently for chlordiazepoxide. The relative potency of chlordiazepoxide and diazepam was three times less in the midazolam-trained animals than in the chlordiazepoxide-trained animals. Response rate and latency data further support the main finding that the midazolam cue is similar, but not identical to the cue of classical benzodiazepines.

Sensitivity of pentylenetetrazol discrimination increased by a stimulus fading technique

The interoceptive stimulus produced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) is pharmacologically similar to anxiety and is used in a behavioral assay for anxiety-related stimuli (the PTZ model of anxiety). The stimulus fading technique was tested as a method to increase the sensitivity of this assay. Rats were trained with food-reward to press one lever after injection of PTZ and an alternate lever after saline. Rats initially learned the discrimination at a PTZ dose of 20 mg/kg. They were then trained with sequentially lower doses until they reliably discriminated a PTZ dose of 10 mg/kg. Substitution tests with other doses and drugs showed that, after the fading procedure, dose-response curves were shifted to lower doses for PTZ, Ro 5-3663, and nicotine Similarly, the dose of diazepam required to block the low dose of PTZ was lower than that required to block the higher dose of PTZ. These results indicated that the sensitivity of the discrimination was enhanced in rats trained to discriminate a lower dose of PTZ. Doses of nikethamide, cocaine, and yohimbine that did not substitute for the higher dose of PTZ also did not substitute for the lower dose. These data suggest that rats can be trained to discriminate a low dose of PTZ by the stimulus fading technique. Moreover, they suggest that this training method does not compromise the specificity of the discrimination.

Differential generalization to pentobarbital in rats trained to discriminate lorazepam, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, or triazolam

In drug discrimination studies benzodiazepine-trained animals have typically responded on the drug lever when tested with barbiturates. In a recent study, greater specificity appeared to be shown when lorazepam was used as a training drug. The generality and limits of this finding were explored in the present set of experiments. The asymmetrical cross-generalization found in lorazepam- and pentobarbital-trained baboons was replicated in rats and was shown not to be a function of either lorazepam (0.1., 0.32, or 1.0 mg/kg) or pentobarbital (10 or 25 mg/kg) training dose (i.e., pentobarbital-trained rats responded on the drug lever in tests with lorazepam, but lorazepam-trained rats did not show comparable pentobarbital generalization). In the next experiment, groups of rats were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (10 mg/kg), triazolam (0.1 mg/kg), or diazepam (1.0 mg/kg). Generalization to both lorazepam and pentobarbital was shown by these rats. Finally after daily pentobarbital administration, lorazepam-trained rats made a sufficient number of responses after high pentobarbital doses to permit extension of the range of pentobarbital doses tested. Pentobarbital generalization increased, but still did not occur in all rats and was unreliable in successive tests in the same rats. These results suggest less homogeneity in the discriminative stimulus effects of "depressant drugs" than generally has been recognized.

Discriminative stimulus properties of anxiolytic and sedative drugs: pharmacological specificity

In the first set of experiments rats were trained to discriminate a dose of 5 mg/kg chlordiazepoxide from saline. The chlordiazepoxide cue was antagonized by flumazepil (Ro 15-1788) and by CGS 8216, and generalized to a variety of anxiolytic and sedative drugs including the benzodiazepine receptor ligands zopiclone, suriclone, CL 218,872, CGS 9896, and ZK 91296. The novel imidazopyridine hypnotic, zolpidem, which also displaces benzodiazepines from their binding sites, failed to produce high levels of responding on the chlordiazepoxide-associated level except at a dose which greatly reduced rates of lever pressing. In further experiments rats were trained to discriminate a dose of 2 mg/kg zolpidem from saline. This dose produced reductions in response rates but an attempt to establish a lower dose of zolpidem as a discriminative stimulus was largely unsuccessful. Zolpidem-appropriate responding was produced by pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, triazolam, CL 218,872, clorazepate, lorazepam, quazepam, and zopiclone but only at doses which reduced response rates. The zolpidem cue was antagonized by flumazepil, CGS 9896, and ZK 91296. While the discriminative stimulus produced by chlordiazepoxide may be related to its anxiolytic action, the zolpidem stimulus is probably more closely associated with sedation. It was also tentatively concluded that the stimulus properties of chlordiazepoxide and zolpidem are produced by activity at different subtypes of benzodiazepine receptors.

Discriminative stimulus properties of chlordiazepoxide and zolpidem. Agonist and antagonist effects of CGS 9896 and ZK 91296

In previous studies the effects of CGS 9896, a pyrazoloquinoline ligand at benzodiazepine receptors, in rats trained to discriminate benzodiazepines from vehicle, have been variable. The present experiment confirmed that this compound produced responding on the drug-lever in rats trained to discriminate 5 mg/kg of chlordiazepoxide from saline, and showed that CGS 9896 did not antagonise the effect of chlordiazepoxide in this test. In contrast, CGS 9896 antagonised the stimulus properties of zolpidem (2 mg/kg), a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic, which displaces benzodiazepines from their binding sites. The drug CGS 9896 also antagonised responding on the drug-lever produced by chlordiazepoxide in rats trained with zolpidem. The beta-carboline, ZK 91296, produced effects similar to those of CGS 9896, giving rise to responding on the drug-lever in rats trained with chlordiazepoxide and antagonising the zolpidem cue. These results demonstrate the mixed agonist-antagonist effects of CGS 9896 and ZK 91296 and suggest that the stimulus properties of chlordiazepoxide and zolpidem may be mediated by different sub-types of benzodiazepine receptors.