Defining functional drug-interaction domains on topoisomerase II by exploiting mechanistic differences between drug classes

Dual topoisomerase I/II inhibitors

Topoisomerase (topo) I and II are nuclear enzymes, which play a major role in the topological rearrangement of DNA during replication and transcription processes. In the course of years, many different agents have been found which can inhibit the topos and thereby exploit cytotoxicity, also against tumour cells. Selective inhibition of the topo I enzyme can, however, induce a reactive increase in topo II levels, and vice versa. This mechanism is associated with the development of drug resistance. Dual inhibition of both topo I and II may, theoretically, overcome this resistance problem. In this review, the most important and promising dual topo I/II inhibitors designed as anticancer agents will be discussed. Thus far, only the indolyl quinoline derivative TAS-103, the 7 H-benzo [ e] pyrido [4,3- b] indole derivative intoplicine, and the acridine derivative PZA have been shown to be dual topo inhibitors with high cytotoxicity.

A "Double-Edged" Scaffold: Antitumor Power within the Antibacterial Quinolone

In the late 1980s, reports emerged describing experimental antibacterial quinolones having significant potency against eukaryotic Type II topoisomerases (topo II) and showing cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines. As a result, several pharmaceutical companies initiated quinolone anticancer programs to explore the potential of this class in comparison to conventional human topo II inhibiting antitumor drugs such as doxorubicin and etoposide. In this review, we present a modern re-evaluation of the anticancer potential of the quinolone class in the context of today's predominantly pathway-based (rather than cytotoxicity-based) oncology drug R&D environment. The quinolone eukaryotic SAR is comprehensively discussed, contrasted with the corresponding prokaryotic data, and merged with recent structural biology information which is now beginning to help explain the basis for that SAR. Quinolone topo II inhibitors appear to be much less susceptible to efflux-mediated resistance, a current limitation of therapy with conventional agents. Recent advances in the biological understanding of human topo II isoforms suggest that significant progress might now be made in overcoming two other treatment-limiting disadvantages of conventional topo II inhibitors, namely cardiotoxicity and drug-induced secondary leukemias. We propose that quinolone class topo II inhibitors could have a useful future therapeutic role due to the continued need for effective topo II drugs in many cancer treatment settings, and due to the recent biological and structural advances which can now provide, for the first time, specific guidance for the design of a new class of inhibitors potentially superior to existing agents.

Synthesis and biological activity of a photoaffinity etoposide probe

The epipodophyllotoxin etoposide is a potent and widely used anticancer drug that targets DNA topoisomerase II. The synthesis, photochemical, and biological testing of a photoactivatable aromatic azido analogue of etoposide also containing an iodo group is described. This azido analogue should prove useful for identifying the etoposide interaction site on topoisomerase II. Irradiation of the azido analogue and an aldehyde-containing azido precursor with UV light produced changes in their UV--visible spectra that were consistent with photoactivation. The azido analogue strongly inhibited topoisomerase II and inhibited the growth of Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. Azido analogue-induced topoisomerase II--DNA covalent complexes were significantly increased subsequent to UV irradiation of drug-treated human leukemia K562 cells as compared to etoposide-treated cells. These results suggest that the photoactivated form of etoposide is a more effective topoisomerase II poison either by interacting directly with the enzyme or with DNA subsequent to topoisomerase II-mediated strand cleavage.

Sensitivity of human type II topoisomerases to DNA damage: stimulation of enzyme-mediated DNA cleavage by abasic, oxidized and alkylated lesions

Type II topoisomerases are essential enzymes that are also the primary cellular targets for a number of important anticancer drugs. These drugs act by increasing levels of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage. Recent studies indicate that endogenous forms of DNA damage, such as abasic sites and base mismatches, also stimulate the DNA scission activity of the enzyme. To extend our understanding of how type II topoisomerases react to DNA damage, the effects of abasic sites, and oxidized and alkylated bases on DNA cleavage mediated by human topo-isomerase IIalpha and beta were determined. Based on experiments that incorporated random abasic sites into plasmid DNA, human type II enzymes can locate lesions even within a background of several thousand undamaged base pairs. As determined by experiments that utilized site-specific forms of DNA lesions, oxidized or monoalkylated purines that allow base pairing and induce little distortion in the double helix have modest effects on topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage. In contrast, 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine, a bulky lesion that disrupts base pairing, enhanced DNA cleavage approximately 10-fold. 1,N(6)-Ethenoadenine is the first lesion found to rival the stimulatory effects of apurinic sites on the DNA scission activity of eukaryotic type II topoisomerases.

Topoisomerase II as a target for anticancer drugs: when enzymes stop being nice

Topoisomerase II is an essential enzyme that plays a role in virtually every cellular DNA process. This enzyme interconverts different topological forms of DNA by passing one nucleic acid segment through a transient double-stranded break generated in a second segment. By virtue of its double-stranded DNA passage reaction, topoisomerase II is able to regulate DNA over- and underwinding, and can resolve knots and tangles in the genetic material. Beyond the critical physiological functions of the eukaryotic enzyme, topoisomerase II is the target for some of the most successful anticancer drugs used to treat human malignancies. These agents are referred to as topoisomerase II poisons, because they transform the enzyme into a potent cellular toxin. Topoisomerase II poisons act by increasing the concentration of covalent enzyme-cleaved DNA complexes that normally are fleeting intermediates in the catalytic cycle of topoisomerase II. As a result of their action, these drugs generate high levels of enzyme-mediated breaks in the genetic material of treated cells and ultimately trigger cell death pathways. Topoisomerase II is also the target for a second category of drugs referred to as catalytic inhibitors. Compounds in this category prevent topoisomerase II from carrying out its required physiological functions. Drugs from both categories vary widely in their mechanisms of actions. This review focuses on topoisomerase II function and how drugs alter the catalytic cycle of this important enzyme.

Pharmacology of CFTR chloride channel activity

Pharmacology of CFTR Chloride Channel Activity. Physiol. Rev. 79, Suppl.: S109-S144, 1999. - The pharmacology of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is at an early stage of development. Here we attempt to review the status of those compounds that modulate the Cl- channel activity of CFTR. Three classes of compounds, the sulfonylureas, the disulfonic stilbenes, and the arylaminobenzoates, have been shown to directly interact with CFTR to cause channel blockade. Kinetic analysis has revealed the sulfonylureas and arylaminobenzoates interact with the open state of CFTR to cause blockade. Suggestive evidence indicates the disulfonic stilbenes act by a similar mechanism but only from the intracellular side of CFTR. Site-directed mutagenesis studies indicate the involvement of specific amino acid residues in the proposed transmembrane segment 6 for disulfonic stilbene blockade and segments 6 and 12 for arylaminobenzoate blockade. Unfortunately, these compounds (sulfonylureas, disulfonic stilbenes, arylaminobenzoate) also act at a number of other cellular sites that can indirectly alter the activity of CFTR or the transepithelial secretion of Cl-. The nonspecificity of these compounds has complicated the interpretation of results from cellular-based experiments. Compounds that increase the activity of CFTR include the alkylxanthines, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, phosphatase inhibitors, isoflavones and flavones, benzimidazolones, and psoralens. Channel activation can arise from the stimulation of the cAMP signal transduction cascade, the inhibition of inactivating enzymes (phosphodiesterases, phosphatases), as well as the direct binding to CFTR. However, in contrast to the compounds that block CFTR, a detailed understanding of how the above compounds increase the activity of CFTR has not yet emerged.

DNA-binding preferences of bisantrene analogues: relevance to the sequence specificity of drug-mediated topoisomerase II poisoning

To elucidate structure-activity relationships for drugs that are able to poison or inhibit topoisomerase II, we investigated the thermodynamics and stereochemistry of the DNA binding of a number of anthracene derivatives bearing one or two 4, 5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl-hydrazone side chains (characteristic of bisantrene) at different positions of the planar aromatic system. An aza-bioisostere, which can be considered a bisantrene-amsacrine hybrid, was also tested. The affinity for nucleic acids in different sequence contexts was evaluated by spectroscopic techniques, using various experimental conditions. DNA-melting and DNase I footprinting experiments were also performed. The location and number of the otherwise identical side chains dramatically affected the affinity of the test compounds for the nucleic acid. In addition, the new compounds exhibited different DNA sequence preferences, depending on the locations of the dihydroimidazolyl-hydrazone groups, which indicates a major role for the side-chain position in generating specific contacts with the nucleic acid. Molecular modeling studies of the intercalative binding of the 1- or 9-substituted isomers to DNA fully supported the experimental data, because a substantially more favorable recognition of A-T steps, compared with G-C steps, was found for the 9-substituted derivative, whereas a much closer energy balance was found for the 1-substituted isomer. These results compare well with the alteration of base specificity found for the topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage stimulated by the isomeric drugs. Therefore, DNA-binding specificity appears to represent an important determinant for the recognition of the topoisomerase-DNA cleavable complex by the drug, at least for poisons belonging to the amsacrine-bisantrene family.

Mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and drugs targeted to the enzyme

Topoisomerase II is a ubiquitous enzyme that is essential for the survival of all eukaryotic organisms and plays critical roles in virtually every aspect of DNA metabolism. The enzyme unknots and untangles DNA by passing an intact helix through a transient double-stranded break that it generates in a separate helix. Beyond its physiological functions, topoisomerase II is the target for some of the most active and widely prescribed anticancer drugs currently utilized for the treatment of human cancers. These drugs act in an insidious fashion and kill cells by increasing levels of covalent topoisomerase II-cleaved DNA complexes that are normally fleeting intermediates in the catalytic cycle of the enzyme. Over the past several years, we have made considerable strides in our understanding of the catalytic mechanism of topoisomerase II and the mechanism of action of drugs targeted to this enzyme. These advances have provided novel insights into the physiological functions of topoisomerase II and have led to the development of more efficacious chemotherapeutic regimens and novel anticancer drugs. Considering the importance of topoisomerase II to the eukaryotic cell and to cancer chemotherapy, it is essential to understand its enzymatic function and pharmacological properties. Therefore, this review will discuss the mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and topoisomerase II-targeted drugs.

Topoisomerase IV catalysis and the mechanism of quinolone action

Topoisomerase IV is a bacterial type II topoisomerase that is essential for proper chromosome segregation and is a target for quinolone-based antimicrobial agents. Despite the importance of this enzyme to the survival of prokaryotic cells and to the treatment of bacterial infections, relatively little is known about the details of its catalytic mechanism or the basis by which quinolones alter its enzymatic functions. Therefore, a series of experiments that analyzed individual steps of the topoisomerase IV catalytic cycle were undertaken to address these critical mechanistic issues. The following conclusions were drawn. First, equilibrium levels of DNA cleavage mediated by the bacterial enzyme were considerably (>10-fold) higher than those observed with its eukaryotic counterparts. To a large extent, this reflected decreased rates of DNA religation. Second, the preference of topoisomerase IV for catalyzing DNA decatenation over relaxation reflects increased rates of strand passage and enzyme recycling rather than a heightened recognition of intermolecular DNA helices. Third, quinolones stimulate topoisomerase IV-mediated DNA cleavage both by increasing rates of DNA scission and by inhibiting religation of cleaved DNA. Finally, quinolones inhibit the overall catalytic activity of topoisomerase IV primarily by interfering with enzyme-ATP interactions.

Merbarone inhibits the catalytic activity of human topoisomerase IIalpha by blocking DNA cleavage

Merbarone is a catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerase II that is in clinical trials as an anticancer agent. Despite the potential therapeutic value of this drug, the mechanism by which it blocks topoisomerase II activity has not been delineated. Therefore, to determine the mechanistic basis for the inhibitory action of merbarone, the effects of this drug on individual steps of the catalytic cycle of human topoisomerase IIalpha were assessed. Concentrations of merbarone that inhibited catalytic activity >/=80% had no effect on either enzyme.DNA binding or ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, the drug was a potent inhibitor of enzyme-mediated DNA scission (in the absence or presence of ATP), and the inhibitory profiles of merbarone for DNA cleavage and relaxation were similar. These data indicate that merbarone acts primarily by blocking topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage. Merbarone inhibited DNA scission in a global (rather than site-specific) fashion but did not appear to intercalate into DNA or bind in the minor groove. Since the drug competed with etoposide (a cleavage-enhancing agent that binds directly to topoisomerase II), it is proposed that merbarone exerts its inhibitory effects through interactions with the enzyme and that the drug shares an interaction domain on topoisomerase II with cleavage-enhancing agents.

Characterization of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line with acquired resistance to the bisdioxopiperazine dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerase II

A Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line highly resistant to the non-cleavable complex-forming topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane (ICRF-187, Zinecard) was selected. The resistant cell line (DZR) was 1500-fold resistant (IC50 = 2800 vs 1.8 microM) to continuous dexrazoxane exposure. DZR cells were also cross-resistant (8- to 500-fold) to other bisdioxopiperazines (ICRF-193, ICRF-154, and ICRF-186), and somewhat cross-resistant (4- to 14-fold) to anthracyclines (daunorubicin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, and idarubicin) and etoposide (8.5-fold), but not to the other non-cleavable complex-forming topoisomerase II inhibitors suramin and merbarone. The cytotoxicity of dexrazoxane to both cell lines was unchanged in the presence of the membrane-active agent verapamil. DZR cells were 9-fold resistant to dexrazoxane-mediated inhibition of topoisomerase II DNA decatenation activity compared with CHO cells (IC50 = 400 vs 45 microM), but were only 1.4-fold (IC50 = 110 vs 83 microM) resistant to etoposide. DZR cells contained one-half the level of topoisomerase II protein compared with parental CHO cells. However, the specific activity for decatenation using nuclear extract topoisomerase II was unchanged. Etoposide (100 microM)-induced topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in DZR cells and isolated nuclei were similarly one-half the level found in CHO cells and in isolated nuclei. However, the ability of 500 microM dexrazoxane to inhibit etoposide (100 microM)-induced topoisomerase II-DNA covalent complexes was reduced 4- to 6-fold in both DZR cells and nuclei compared with CHO cells and nuclei. In contrast, there was no differential ability of aclarubicin or merbarone to inhibit etoposide-induced topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in CHO compared with DZR cells and isolated nuclei. It was concluded that the DZR cell line acquired its resistance to dexrazoxane mainly through an alteration in the topoisomerase II target.

In the presence of subunit A inhibitors DNA gyrase cleaves DNA fragments as short as 20 bp at specific sites

A key step in the supercoiling reaction is the DNA gyrase-mediated cleavage and religation step of double-stranded DNA. Footprinting studies suggest that the DNA gyrase binding site is 100-150 bp long and that the DNA is wrapped around the enzyme with the cleavage site located near the center of the fragment. Subunit A inhibitors interrupt this cleavage and resealing cycle and result in cleavage occurring at preferred sites. We have been able to show that even a 30 bp DNA fragment containing a 20 bp preferred cleavage sequence from the pBR322 plasmid was a substrate for the DNA gyrase-mediated cleavage reaction in the presence of inhibitors. This DNA fragment was cleaved, although with reduced efficiency, at the same sites as a 122 bp DNA fragment. A 20 bp DNA fragment was cleaved with low efficiency at one of these sites and a 10 bp DNA fragment was no longer a substrate. We therefore propose that subunit A inhibitors interact with DNA at inhibitor-specific positions, thus determining cleavage sites by forming ternary complexes between DNA, inhibitors and DNA gyrase.

Topoisomerase II.etoposide interactions direct the formation of drug-induced enzyme-DNA cleavage complexes

Topoisomerase II is the target for several highly active anticancer drugs that induce cell death by enhancing enzyme-mediated DNA scission. Although these agents dramatically increase levels of nucleic acid cleavage in a site-specific fashion, little is understood regarding the mechanism by which they alter the DNA site selectivity of topoisomerase II. Therefore, a series of kinetic and binding experiments were carried out to determine the mechanistic basis by which the anticancer drug, etoposide, enhances cleavage complex formation at 22 specific nucleic acid sequences. In general, maximal levels of DNA scission (i.e. Cmax) varied over a considerably larger range than did the apparent affinity of etoposide (i.e. Km) for these sites, and there was no correlation between these two kinetic parameters. Furthermore, enzyme.drug binding and order of addition experiments indicated that etoposide and topoisomerase II form a kinetically competent complex in the absence of DNA. These findings suggest that etoposide. topoisomerase II (rather than etoposide.DNA) interactions mediate cleavage complex formation. Finally, rates of religation at specific sites correlated inversely with Cmax values, indicating that maximal levels of etoposide-induced scission reflect the ability of the drug to inhibit religation at specific sequences rather than the affinity of the drug for site-specific enzyme-DNA complexes.

Mutagenicity of anticancer drugs that inhibit topoisomerase enzymes

Topoisomerases are enzymes that catalyse the transient breakage and rejoining of either one (topo I) or two (topo II) DNA strands, to allow one strand to pass through another and prevent unresolvable tangles during processes such as DNA replication. A number of important clinical antitumour agents act through inhibition of topo II enzymes, while some topo I inhibitors appear likely to enter clinical use. Although these chemicals do not covalently interact with DNA, they have strong mutagenic potential, generally causing events at the level of the chromosome rather than that of the gene. Most are recombinogens, may affect gene expression and can also lead to aneuploidy through effects on chromosome segregation. Most topo I and topo II inhibitors primarily cause mutagenic events associated with the replication fork. However, at least in mitotic chromosomes, topo II enzymes are located at the base of chromosome loops, and topo II inhibitors may facilitate subunit exchanges, leading to major deletions and illegitimate recombinational events. There is evidence that programmed cell death provides an alternative pathway to mutagenesis following treatment by either topo I or topo II inhibitors. The final fate of the cell will result from a balance between these two processes.