Subtype-selective up-regulation of human saphenous vein beta 2-adrenoceptors by chronic beta-adrenoceptor antagonist treatment

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CX. Classification of Receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine; Pharmacology and Function

5-HT receptors expressed throughout the human body are targets for established therapeutics and various drugs in development. Their diversity of structure and function reflects the important role 5-HT receptors play in physiologic and pathophysiological processes. The present review offers a framework for the official receptor nomenclature and a detailed understanding of each of the 14 5-HT receptor subtypes, their roles in the systems of the body, and, where appropriate, the (potential) utility of therapeutics targeting these receptors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review provides a comprehensive account of the classification and function of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors, including how they are targeted for therapeutic benefit.

β-adrenoceptor blocker treatment and the cardiac β-adrenoceptor-G-protein(s)-adenylyl cyclase system in chronic heart failure

Recent studies showed that chronic beta-adrenoceptor (AR) blocker treatment exerts beneficial effects in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). In CHF, sympathetic drive to the heart is increased, and this causes pathological changes in cardiac beta-AR-G-protein(s)-adenylyl cyclase system: Cardiac beta-1 AR are decreased, and amount and activity of cardiac G(i)-protein and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) are increased resulting in diminished cardiac beta-AR functional responsiveness. One possible mechanism of beneficial effects of beta-AR blockers could be that they prevent adverse effects of increased sympathetic activity and up-regulate cardiac (and vascular) beta-AR density, and by this, enhance beta-AR-mediated effects. Another possibility could be that chronic beta-AR blocker treatment normalizes activity of G(i)-protein and may thereby restore beta-AR functional responsiveness. Moreover, failing human heart exhibits an inverse force-frequency relationship. beta-AR blockers reduce heart rate; this may, therefore, improve force of contraction. One of the strongest stimuli to activate GRK is increased sympathetic activity (as in CHF) via beta-AR stimulation. beta-AR blockers, by blocking beta-AR, can prevent GRK activation and/or can reduce the (previously enhanced) GRK activity, and this might-at least partly-contribute to beneficial effects of beta-AR blockers in CHF treatment. Finally, the "loss-of-function" Arg389Gly beta-1 AR polymorphism seems to determine heart rate and blood pressure responses to beta-1 AR blocker administration: Arg389Arg beta-1 AR subjects exhibit stronger effects than subjects with one or two Gly389 alleles. Thus, it might be predicted that patients homozygous Arg389 beta-1 AR should be good responders, whereas patients homozygous Gly389 beta-1 AR polymorphism should be poor or non-responders.

Functional Pharmacology in Human Brain

Most neurological and psychiatric disorders involve selective or preferential impairments of neurotransmitter systems. Therefore, studies of functional transmitter pathophysiology in human brain are of unique importance in view of the development of effective, mechanism-based, therapeutic modalities. It is well known that central nervous system functional proteins, including receptors, transporters, ion channels, and enzymes, can exhibit high heterogeneity in terms of structure, function, and pharmacological profile. If the existence of types and subtypes of functional proteins amplifies the possibility of developing selective drugs, such heterogeneity certainly increases the likelihood of interspecies differences. It is therefore essential, before choosing animal models to be used in preclinical pharmacology experimentation, to establish whether functionally corresponding proteins in men and animals also display identical pharmacological profiles. Because of evidence that scaffolding proteins, trafficking between plasma membrane and intracellular pools, phosphorylation and allosteric modulators can affect the function of receptors and transporters, experiments with human clones expressed in host cells where the environment of native receptors is rarely reproduced should be interpreted with caution. Thus, the use of neurosurgically removed fresh human brain tissue samples in which receptors, transporters, ion channels, and enzymes essentially retain their natural environment represents a unique experimental approach to enlarge our understanding of human brain processes and to help in the choice of appropriate animal models. Using this experimental approach, many human brain functional proteins, in particular transmitter receptors, have been characterized in terms of localization, function, and pharmacological properties.

Comparison of the effects of nadolol and bisoprolol on the isoprenaline-evoked dilatation of the dorsal hand vein in man

AIMS

We attempted to explore the possible differential involvement of beta-adrenoceptor subtypes in the dilator response of the human dorsal hand vein to isoprenaline by examining the ability of bisoprolol, a selective beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, and nadolol, a nonselective beta1/beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist, to antagonize the response.

METHODS

Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in four weekly sessions. In the preliminary session a dose-response curve to the vasoconstrictor effect of phenylephrine was constructed and the dose producing 50-75% maximal response was determined for each individual. In each of the remaining three (treatment) sessions, nadolol (40 mg), bisoprolol (5 mg) or placebo was ingested, and isoprenaline hydrochloride (3.33-1000 ng min(-1)) was infused locally into the dorsal hand vein along with a constant dose of phenylephrine hydrochloride (to preconstrict the vein) 2 h after the ingestion of the drugs. Changes in vein diameter were monitored with the dorsal hand vein compliance technique. Subjects were allocated to treatment session according to a double-blind balanced cross-over design. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were also measured.

RESULTS

Isoprenaline produced dose-dependent venodilatation which was antagonized by nadolol but remained unaffected by bisoprolol (ANOVA with repeated measures: P < 0.025; Dunnett's test: placebo vs nadolol, P < 0.01; placebo vs bisoprolol, P = NS). Mean log ED50 (ng min-1) was significantly increased in the presence of nadolol and remained unchanged in the presence of bisoprolol (ANOVA, P < 0.025; Dunnett's test: placebo vs nadolol, P < 0.005; placebo vs bisoprolol, P = NS; differences between mean log ED50 [95% CI]: placebo vs bisoprolol -0.11 [-0.38, 0.16], placebo vs nadolol 0.32[0.09, 0.72], bisoprolol vs nadolol -0.43 [-0.71, -0.15]). Mean Emax did not differ in the three treatment conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The failure of bisoprolol to attenuate isoprenaline-evoked venodilatation in the human dorsal hand vein argues against the involvement of a beta1-adrenoceptor-mediated component in the isoprenaline-evoked venodilatory responses. The possibility cannot be excluded that the consequences of beta1-adrenoceptor blockade by bisoprolol might have been obscured by a possible venodilator effect of bisoprolol.

Are patients chronically treated with beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonists in fact beta-blocked?

OBJECTIVE

To determine cardiovascular beta-receptor function in patients with ischemic heart disease chronically treated with beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonists.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind, nonrandomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty middle-age men scheduled for primary elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Twenty patients were treated with beta 1-antagonists.

INTERVENTIONS

After induction of anesthesia, increasing intravenous bolus doses of isoproterenol were administered in order to increase heart rate more than 25 BPM. From this dose-response curve, the isoproterenol dose needed to increase heart rate by exactly 25 BPM was calculated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Baseline cardiovascular variables and the pharmacodynamic responses to isoproterenol were monitored with catheters in the radial and the pulmonary artery (thermodilution catheter). Heart rate was continuously calculated from the electrocardiogram. The hemodynamic status after induction of a standardized fentanyl anesthesia and the chronotropic and inotropic responses to the isoproterenol titration procedure were identical in the 20 beta 1-blocked patients and in the 20 control patients. The median dose of isoproterenol needed to increase heart rate 25 BPM was 10.9 micrograms in the beta-blocked patients and 9.4 micrograms in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Patients chronically treated with beta 1-antagonists compensate for the perturbation to such a degree that cardiovascular beta-receptor function is in fact normal.

Receptor systems in the non-failing human heart

Catecholamines acting through beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors cause positive inotropic and chronotropic effects in the human heart. In recent years, however, evidence has accumulated that in the human heart also other receptor systems can affect heart rate and/or contractility. Positive inotropic effects can be mediated by receptor systems acting through accumulation of intracellular cAMP (Gs-protein coupled receptors such as 5-HT4-like, histamine H2, and vasoactive intestinal peptide) or by receptor systems acting independent of cAMP possibly through the phospholipase C/diacylglycerol/inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate pathway (such as alpha 1-adrenergic, angiotensin II, and endothelin). In the non-failing human heart, however, activation of all these receptor systems induces only submaximal positive inotropic effects when compared with those caused by beta-adrenoceptor stimulation, indicating that in humans the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor-Gs-protein-adenylate cyclase pathway is the most powerful mechanism to increase heart rate and contractility. On the other hand, at least three receptor systems acting through inhibition of cAMP formation (Gi-protein coupled receptors) exist in the human heart: muscarinic M2-, adenosine A1-, and somatostatin-receptors. Activation of M2- and A1-receptors causes negative inotropic effects in the non-failing human heart: in atria activation of both receptors causes decreases in basal as well as in isoprenaline-stimulated force of contraction, but in ventricles only isoprenaline-stimulated force of contraction is depressed.

Beta- and alpha-adrenoceptor-agonists and -antagonists in chronic heart failure

In patients with chronic heart failure, cardiac beta-adrenoceptor function is decreased, and this decrease is related to the degree of heart failure. Under these conditions, treatment with beta-adrenoceptor agonists seems to be of limited value as it might further down-regulate cardiac beta-adrenoceptors, resulting, finally, in a loss of therapeutic efficacy. However, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists might have beneficial effects, because they can protect the myocardium from the deleterious effects of elevated endogenous catecholamines and can, simultaneously, restore the previously down-regulated beta-adrenoceptor function. Stimulation of cardiac alpha-adrenoceptors, however, seems not to be of any therapeutic value in patients with chronic heart failure, because a) the number of alpha-adrenoceptors in the human heart is very low and its function is not completely understood, and b) no alpha-adrenoceptor agonist is presently available that selectively stimulates cardiac alpha-adrenoceptors without concomitantly activating vascular alpha-adrenoceptors. In acute myocardial ischemia, cardiac beta-adrenoceptors increase; this increase is--at least in early acute myocardial ischemia--accompanied by an increased beta-adrenoceptor functional responsiveness; thus, under these conditions, beta-adrenoceptor agonists again might not be of clinical value, while beta-adrenoceptor antagonists may exert beneficial effects, because they can block (over)activation of the sensitized beta-adrenoceptors by elevated endogenous catecholamines.

Agonist-induced desensitization of beta-adrenoceptor function in humans. Subtype-selective reduction in beta 1- or beta 2-adrenoceptor-mediated physiological effects by xamoterol or procaterol

We investigated the effects of beta 2- (procaterol 2 x 50 micrograms/day for 9 days) and beta 1- (xamoterol 2 x 200 mg/day for 14 days) adrenoceptor agonists on lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptor density and beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor in vivo function (assessed as isoprenaline-infusion-evoked hemodynamic effects and exercise-induced tachycardia) in healthy volunteers. Procaterol decreased lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptor density and all beta 2-adrenoceptor-mediated in vivo effects but did not affect beta 1-adrenoceptor-mediated in vivo effects. In contrast, xamoterol neither affected lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptors nor beta 2-adrenoceptor-mediated in vivo effects but decreased beta 1-adrenoceptor-mediated in vivo effects. It is concluded that in humans, generally long-term application of beta 1- or beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists causes desensitization of beta-adrenoceptor function but in a beta-adrenoceptor subtype-selective fashion.