Ointments and transdermal nitroglycerin patches for stable angina pectoris

Stable Angina Medical Therapy Management Guidelines: A Critical Review of Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

Most patients with stable angina can be managed with lifestyle changes, especially smoking cessation and regular exercise, along with taking antianginal drugs. Randomised controlled trials show that antianginal drugs are equally effective and none of them reduced mortality or the risk of MI, yet guidelines prefer the use of beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers as a first-line treatment. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of stable coronary artery disease provide classes of recommendation with levels of evidence that are well defined. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of stable angina provide guidelines based on cost and effectiveness using the terms first-line and second-line therapy. Both guidelines recommend using low-dose aspirin and statins as disease-modifying agents. The aim of this article is to critically appraise the guidelines’ pharmacological recommendations for managing patients with stable angina.

The Role of Nitroglycerin and Other Nitrogen Oxides in Cardiovascular Therapeutics

The use of nitroglycerin in the treatment of angina pectoris began not long after its original synthesis in 1847. Since then, the discovery of nitric oxide as a biological effector and better understanding of its roles in vasodilation, cell permeability, platelet function, inflammation, and other vascular processes have advanced our knowledge of the hemodynamic (mostly mediated through vasodilation of capacitance and conductance arteries) and nonhemodynamic effects of organic nitrate therapy, via both nitric oxide-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Nitrates are rapidly absorbed from mucous membranes, the gastrointestinal tract, and the skin; thus, nitroglycerin is available in a number of preparations for delivery via several routes: oral tablets, sublingual tablets, buccal tablets, sublingual spray, transdermal ointment, and transdermal patch, as well as intravenous formulations. Organic nitrates are commonly used in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, but clinical data limit their use mostly to the treatment of angina. They are also used in the treatment of subsets of patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. One major limitation of the use of nitrates is the development of tolerance. Although several agents have been studied for use in the prevention of nitrate tolerance, none are currently recommended owing to a paucity of supportive clinical data. Only 1 method of preventing nitrate tolerance remains widely accepted: the use of a dosing strategy that provides an interval of no or low nitrate exposure during each 24-h period. Nitric oxide's important role in several cardiovascular disease mechanisms continues to drive research toward finding novel ways to affect both endogenous and exogenous sources of this key molecular mediator.

The risk of cardiovascular side effects with anti-anginal drugs

INTRODUCTION

Angina pectoris is a common presenting symptom of underlying coronary artery disease or reduced coronary flow reserve. Patients with angina have impaired quality of life; and need to be treated optimally with antianginal drugs to control symptoms and improve exercise performance. A wide range of antianginal medications are approved for the treatment of angina, and often more than one class of antianginal drugs are used to adequately control the symptoms. This expert opinion highlights the likely cardiac adverse effects of available antianginal drugs, and how to minimize these in individual patients and especially during combination treatment. Areas covered: All approved antianginal drugs, including the older and newly approved medications with different mechanism of action to the older drugs as well as some of the unapproved herbal medications. The safety profiles and potential cardiac side effects of these medications when used as monotherapy or as combination therapy are discussed and highlighted. Expert opinion: Because of the different cardiac safety profiles and possible side effects, we recommend selection of initial drug or adjustment of therapy based on the resting heart rate; blood pressure, hemodynamic status; and resting left ventricular function, concomitant medications and any associated comorbidities.

Challenges with nitrate therapy and nitrate tolerance: prevalence, prevention, and clinical relevance

Nitrate therapy has been an effective treatment for ischemic heart disease for over 100 years. The anti-ischemic and exercise-promoting benefits of sublingually administered nitrates are well established. Nitroglycerin is indicated for the relief of an established attack of angina and for prophylactic use, but its effects are short lived. In an effort to increase the duration of beneficial effects, long-acting orally administered and topical applications of nitrates have been developed; however, following their continued or frequent daily use, patients soon develop tolerance to these long-acting nitrate preparations. Once tolerance develops, patients begin losing the protective effects of the long-acting nitrate therapy. By providing a nitrate-free interval, or declining nitrate levels at night, one can overcome or reduce the development of tolerance, but cannot provide 24-h anti-anginal and anti-ischemic protection. In addition, patients may be vulnerable to occurrence of rebound angina and myocardial ischemia during periods of absent nitrate levels at night and early hours of the morning, and worsening of exercise capacity prior to the morning dose of the medication. This has been a concern with nitroglycerin patches but not with oral formulations of isosorbide-5 mononitrates, and has not been adequately studied with isosorbide dinitrate. This paper describes problems associated with nitrate tolerance, reviews mechanisms by which nitrate tolerance and loss of efficacy develop, and presents strategies to avoid nitrate tolerance and maintain efficacy when using long-acting nitrate formulations.

Side effects of using nitrates to treat heart failure and the acute coronary syndromes, unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction

Nitrates are potent venous dilators and anti-ischemic agents. They are widely used for the relief of chest pain and pulmonary congestion in patients with acute coronary syndromes and heart failure. Nitrates, however, do not reduce mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Combination of nitrates and hydralazine when given in addition to beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction who are of African-American origin. Side effects during nitrate therapy are common but are less well described in the literature compared with the reported side effects in patients with stable angina pectoris. The reported incidence of side effects varies highly among different studies and among various disease states. Headache is the most commonly reported side effect with an incidence of 12% in acute heart failure, 41-73% in chronic heart failure, 3-19% in unstable angina and 2-26% in acute myocardial infarction. The reported incidence of hypotension also differs: 5-10% in acute heart failure, 20% in chronic heart failure, 9% in unstable angina and < 1-48% in acute myocardial infarction, with the incidence being much higher with concomitant nitrate therapy plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Reported incidence of dizziness is as low as 1% in patients with acute myocardial infarction to as high as 29% in patients with heart failure. Severe headaches and/or symptomatic hypotension may necessitate discontinuation of nitrate therapy. Severe life threatening hypotension or even death may occur when nitrates are used in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction associated with right ventricular dysfunction or infarction, or with concomitant use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or N-acetylcysteine. Despite the disturbing observational reports in the literature that continuous and prolonged use of nitrates may lead to increased mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease, no such adverse effects of nitrates have been reported in the large randomized trials in patients with acute myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure.

S-nitrosoglutathione-containing hydrogel increases dermal blood flow in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by decreased vasodilatory capacity of the arterioles mainly due to the reduced release of nitric oxide (NO). Application of NO donors may prevent or even reverse the consequences of endothelial dysfunction, such as diabetic leg ulcers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the vasodilatory capacity and the possible side-effects of topical application of an NO donor-containing hydrogel in diabetic rats.

METHODS

S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) was incorporated in Pluronic F127 hydrogel and applied on the foot sole skin of healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Blood flow was monitored using a laser-Doppler probe. Nitrotyrosine formation, a possible side-effect of GSNO action, was evaluated by Western blotting of skin protein extracts. Systemic circulatory side-effects were investigated by monitoring blood pressure and heart rate during the application.

RESULTS

The hydrogel alone did not induce any changes in microvascular flow, while GSNO-containing hydrogel caused a twofold increase in perfusion. This effect was similar in diabetic and healthy animals. Topical GSNO application did not increase the nitrotyrosine content of skin proteins, nor did it have any effect on blood pressure or heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermal application of GSNO may be an effective treatment for promoting the local vasodilation in both healthy and diabetic states, without inducing protein nitration or alterations in blood pressure or heart rate.

Side effects of using nitrates to treat angina

Nitrates are very effective antianginal and anti-ischaemic agents. Provision of a long nitrate-free interval or low plasma nitrate levels prior to the morning dose prevents the loss of clinical efficacy by preventing the development of tolerance. However, side effects during nitrate therapy are common. Headache is the most common side effect of nitrates; often dose-related and reported by up to 82% of patients in placebo-controlled trials. Nearly 10% of patients are unable to tolerate nitrates due to disabling headaches or dizziness. In others, headaches are mild-to-moderate in severity and either resolve or diminish in intensity with continued nitrate therapy. Nitrate-induced hypotension is common, but often asymptomatic. In rare instances, nitrate-induced hypotension is severe and accompanied by marked slowing of the heart rate and syncope. Use of nitrates in patients who experience syncope after administration of nitrates is contraindicated. Nitrates rarely cause coronary steal and myocardial ischaemia. Nitrate rebound may occur and patients may experience nocturnal anginal episodes during intermittent therapy with nitroglycerin patches. Administration of nitrates is contraindicated with concomitant use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, as combination therapy may lead to profound hypotension and even death. There are disturbing observational reports in the literature that continuous, prolonged use of nitrates may lead to increased mortality and recurrent myocardial infarctions. Large, randomised, placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm or refute these reports; until then, the use of nitrates to treat angina is here to stay.

The effects of organic nitrates on osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN94484747]

Background

Osteoporotic fractures are common and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The most effective way to moderate increases in health care costs and the sickness and premature death associated with osteoporotic fractures, is to prevent osteoporosis. Several lines of evidence suggest that nitrates, drugs typically prescribed for the treatment of angina, may be effective in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

We have designed a multicentre randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of nitrates on bone. The trial consists of two studies. The objective of the first study is to determine whether isosorbide mononitrate at 20 mg/day or nitroglycerin ointment at 15 mg/day leads to fewer headaches. The nitrate that is best tolerated will be used in a second study with one main objective: To determine if postmenopausal women with a T-score at the lumbar spine (L1 to L4) between 0 and -2.0 randomized to two years of treatment with intermittent nitrates have a greater increase in spine bone mineral density as compared to women randomized to placebo.

We hypothesize that: 1. Women will report fewer headaches when they are randomized to intermittent nitroglycerin ointment at 15 mg/day compared to intermittent oral isosorbide mononitrate at 20 mg/day, and, 2. After two years, women randomized to intermittent nitrates will have a greater percent increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density compared with women randomized to placebo.

Discussion

We have completed our pilot study and found that transdermal nitroglycerin was associated with fewer headaches than oral isosorbide mononitrate. We are currently recruiting patients for our second main study.

Current medical management of chronic stable angina

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many more non-obstructive plaques, which are prone to rupture resulting in acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). Therefore, the medical management must use strategies which not only relieve symptoms and prolong angina free walking but also reduce the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes. Whether any of the approved antianginal drugs, nitrates, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers reduce the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina has not been studied to date. Published data shows that percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures and coronary bypass surgery are effective in relieving angina but these procedures do not reduce mortality or the incidence of myocardial infarction compared to anti-anginal drug therapy. From the available data, an initial trial of medical treatment with anti-anginal drugs and strategies to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (smoking cessation, daily aspirin, treatment of dyslipidemias and hypertension) is indicated in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The initial choice of drug will depend on the presence or absence of comorbid conditions. Patients who do not respond to medical therapy or do not wish to take anti-anginal drugs and whose life style is limited because of anginal symptoms should be offered percutaneous revascularization procedures with or without stent placement or coronary bypass surgery. New drug-coated stents hold promise but long-term data and large-scale trials assessing the continued long-term improvement in symptoms and reduction of adverse outcomes is needed before offering such devices to all patients with stable angina. Newer medical therapies such as metabolic modulators and sinus rate lowering drugs also hold promise but need further evaluation. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for some new techniques of enhanced external Counterpulsation, Spinal Cord Stimulation, sympathectomy or direct transmyocardial revascularization. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized trials.

Effect of in vivo nitrate tolerance on hypersensitivity to NO donors after NO-synthase blockade

Animals treated with nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors exhibit marked hypersensitivity to the blood pressure lowering effects of exogenous nitric oxide (NO) donors. We used this model as a sensitive index to evaluate the relative importance of reduced biotransformation of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) to NO in the development of nitrate tolerance. NOS-blockade hypertension using N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) caused a marked enhancement of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) decrease mediated by GTN in nontolerant rats. However, even large doses of GTN were unable to change the MAP in GTN-tolerant, NOS-blockade hypertensive animals. In contrast, the MAP responses to the spontaneous NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were completely unaltered in either tolerant rats or tolerant NOS-blockade hypertensive animals, indicating that NO-dependent vasodilatory mechanisms remain intact despite the development of GTN tolerance. The MAP-lowering effects of GTN in NOS-blockade hypertensive animals were restored 48 h after cessation of chronic GTN exposure. These alterations in the pharmacodynamic response to GTN during tolerance development and reversal were associated with parallel changes in the pattern of GTN metabolite formation, suggesting that the activity of one or more enzymes involved in nitrate metabolism was altered as a consequence of chronic GTN exposure. These findings suggest that the vasodilation resulting from the vascular biotransformation of GTN to NO (or a closely related species) is severely compromised in nitrate-tolerant animals, and that although other mechanisms may contribute to the vascular changes observed following the development of GTN tolerance, decreased GTN bioactivation is likely the most important.

[Tolerability and efficiency of a new transdermic nitroglycerin patch in outpatients with chronic stable angina. The PATRICH Trial]

OBJECTIVE

To obtain data on local and systemic tolerability of three different doses (5 mg/24 h, 10 mg/24 h, and 15 mg/24 h) of a new model of nitroglycerin patch (Trinipatch, Sanofi-Synthelabo, S. A.) in patients with chronic stable angina.

METHODS

A total of 954 patients were studied for a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Patients were distributed as follows: 132 to the 5 mg/24 h patch, 727 to the 10 mg/24 h patch, and 95 to the 15 mg/24 h patch. The local tolerability was evaluated by using the Draize scale and the systemic tolerability by recording the adverse reactions and assessing the effect on blood pressure. Furthermore, the efficiency of therapy was evaluated by means of the variations observed in the number and severity of angina crises, as well as the weekly use of sublingual nitroglycerine.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients (9.8%) showed signs of cutaneous irritation. Thirty-two patients (3.3%) showed erythema, and one patient (0.1%) showed erythema and induration. Thirty-nine patients (4.1%) had some type of systemic adverse reaction during the study. A total of 44 adverse reactions were recorded, headache being the most common (79.5%). Only one severe adverse reaction was observed (mild heart failure), which in the opinion of the researcher was not related to the medication. No dropouts were recorded on account of adverse reactions. The number of patients with angina crises and the number of weekly angina crises decreased significantly with therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The transdermic nitroglycerin patch was demonstrated to be a safe and well tolerated therapy for chronic stable angina, both in terms of local and systemic tolerability. Moreover, its efficiency was demonstrated as the number of angina crises decreased significantly.

Treatment of stable angina

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many nonobstructive plaques, which are prone to fissures or rupture resulting in presentation of acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). In addition to symptomatic relief of symptoms and an increase in angina-free walking time with antianginal drugs or revascularization procedures, the recent emphasis of treatment has been to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (coronary death and myocardial infarction). The role of smoking cessation, aspirin, treatment of elevated lipids, and treatment of high blood pressure in all patients and of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with diminished systolic left ventricular systolic function in reducing adverse outcomes has been well established. What is unknown, however, is whether any anti-anginal drugs (beta-blockers, long-acting nitrates, calcium channel blockers) effect adverse outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris. Recent trials evaluated the usefulness of suppression of ambulatory ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris, but it remains to be established whether suppression of ambulatory myocardial ischemia with antianginal agents or revascularization therapy is superior to pharmacologic therapy targeting symptom relief. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical treatment and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for newer techniques of transmyocardial revascularization, enhanced external counterpulsation, spinal cord stimulation, or sympathectomy. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized clinical trials.

Achieving sustained improvement in myocardial perfusion: role of isosorbide mononitrate

The efficacy of antianginal agents in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina has traditionally been evaluated by performance measures, such as the exercise treadmill test (ETT). Although reliable and reproducible, ETT is not a sensitive measure of changes in myocardial ischemia. The effects of antianginal agents on coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion have been less frequently studied. Angiographic studies have demonstrated that nitrates may operate by preferentially directing blood flow to ischemic regions of the myocardium. These investigations have been limited, however, by the invasive nature of the evaluation. Measurements of regional myocardial perfusion may also be made with noninvasive tests. Both quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been employed, but few studies have used these techniques to assess the effects of antianginal drugs (in general) and nitrates (in particular) on changes in reversible myocardial perfusion defects. Studies that have evaluated the direct effects of nitrate treatment on coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion defects in patients with chronic stable angina are reviewed, and preliminary data from a study of the effects of long-term nitrate treatment on myocardial perfusion are discussed.

Management of patients with chronic stable angina at low risk for serious cardiac events

Successful management of the patient with chronic stable angina requires correct stratification by assessing the risk of future coronary events. Patients at low risk for such events have a relatively good prognosis; revascularization procedures (balloon angioplasty or surgery) offer no benefit over medical management. Such patients should be offered medical therapy as their first option. The goals in management of chronic stable angina are (1) treatment of other conditions that may worsen angina; (2) treatment with aspirin and modification of risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) to improve outcome; and (3) effective relief of anginal symptoms. Most patients with stable angina will have CAD. It is well established that treatment with aspirin and modification of risk factors for CAD are beneficial in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Blood pressure reduction, lowering of blood cholesterol level, and smoking cessation are interventions of proven value and appear to correct defects (at least partially) in the endothelial function of the coronary blood vessels. Other interventions that are helpful are estrogen replacement treatment in postmenopausal women, and low-dose aspirin therapy-which is recommended for all patients who can tolerate it. For controlling symptoms and improving angina-free walking time, nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium channel antagonists are efficacious as first-line monotherapy for chronic stable angina in this group of patients. Nitrates may be of special use in patients with impaired left ventricular function, overt congestive heart failure, intermittent coronary vasoconstriction, or coronary artery spasm. In patients with concomitant hypertension or supraventricular tachycardia, beta blockers are helpful. Calcium channel antagonists may be useful in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, or hypertension. When optimal monotherapy with a given class of drug fails to control symptoms, alternative monotherapy with a different class of agent should be tried before combination therapy. Combination therapy with 2 or 3 agents is not always superior to optimal monotherapy. Patients who fail to respond to adequate medical therapy should be considered for a revascularization procedure.

Nitrate tolerance, rebound, and their clinical relevance in stable angina pectoris, unstable angina, and heart failure

Vascular tolerance develops rapidly in isolated vascular strips exposed to millimolar concentrations of nitroglycerin. Several mechanisms, including depletion of sulfhydryl groups, reduced biotransformation of nitrates to NO or nitrosothiols, oxygen free radical injury, and downregulation of a membrane-bound enzyme or a nitrate receptor, have been proposed, but the exact mechanism responsible for in-vitro tolerance remains unknown. In-vivo tolerance of the beneficial effects of nitrates on hemodynamics, myocardial ischemia, and exercise performance develops rapidly. It has been suggested, but remains to be proven, that development of venous tolerance and not arterial tolerance is responsible for the attenuation of nitrate effects during long-term nitrate therapy. Several mechanisms, including neurohormonal activation, depletion of sulfhdryl groups, and the shift of fluid from the extravascular to intravascular compartment have been implicated. However, the use of agents to counteract these mechanisms (ACE inhibitors, sulfhydryl donors, diuretics) has produced conflicting results. Thus, at present the mechanism responsible for in vivo tolerance to nitrates remains unknown. Both in vitro and in vivo vascular tolerance to nitrates can be prevented or minimized by providing nitrate-free or low-nitrate intervals. However, during nitrate-free periods, rebound phenomena (rest angina in patients with ischemic heart disease or a deterioration in exercise performance prior to the renewal of the morning dose in patients with stable angina) remain a clinical concern. When treating patients with stable angina pectoris, it must be recognized that none of the nitrate preparations or formulations can provide round-the-clock antianginal or antiischemic prophylaxis. In these patients, beneficial antianginal and antiischemic effects of nitrates for 10-14 hours during the daytime can be maintained by using formulations and dosing regimens that avoid or minimize the development of tolerance (standard formulation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate, 20 mg in the morning and 7 hours later; slow-release formulation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate, 120-240 mg once a day; or nitroglycerin patch delivering 0.6 nitroglycerin per hour for 10-12 hours each day). Only the patch on and off treatment is associated with nitrate rebound. Although intermittent nitrate therapy is not associated with the development of tolerance, this strategy cannot be recommended for treating unstable angina because rebound angina during nitrate-free periods complicates clinical decision making. In the acute phase of unstable angina, continuous treatment with intravenous nitroglycerin is recommended because it permits rapid up- or down-titration. Tolerance towards antianginal and antiischemic effects does develop in a substantial number of patients with 24 hours, but this can be overridden by dose escalation and restoration of the therapeutic effectiveness of nitroglycerin. Tolerance towards the beneficial effects of nitrates on hemodynamics and on exercise performance also develops rapidly during continuous or long-term nitrate therapy, and for these reasons nitrates are not used as first-line therapy to treat chronic heart failure. In combination with hydralazine, high-dose isosorbide dinitrate (30-40 mg four times a day) improves survival, but this combination therapy is inferior to ACE inhibitors.

Intermittent or continuous transdermal nitroglycerin: still an issue, or is the case closed?

After a decade of controversy and debate, many experts have now concluded that continuous nitroglycerin patch treatment leads to complete tolerance development and therefore cannot be recommended for any angina patient. This conclusion is largely based on the disappointing results of the large Transdermal Nitroglycerin Cooperative Study, in which continuous patch treatment in doses of 15-105 mg daily failed to increase exercise duration more than placebo after 2 and 8 weeks of treatment. However, other well-designed studies recently reported maintained efficacy during continuous treatment, and the differences in results has remained unexplained. The disagreeing data may be better understood if certain facts are considered: (1) The cooperative study tested a patient population with a very low first-dose treatment response--only 34 seconds (or 10-12%) improvement compared with placebo. At the end of the study, 25% of the patients terminated exercise for reasons other than angina, and a reduced nitrate responsiveness had developed, even in the placebo group. (2) Patients who demonstrate a large first-dose nitrate responsiveness tend to be less susceptible to tolerance development. (3) Even during continuous therapy, maintained efficacy is often observed in exercise tests done 2-5 hours after patch renewal, while typically no effect is seen at the end of the application period. Attenuation of the initial effects is seen with all long-acting nitrate treatment regimens, but the degree of tolerance varies with the patient population, the efficacy parameter (exercise test vs. attack counts), the timing of the efficacy test, the patch dose, and whether or not nitrate-free (-low) intervals are used. In general, intermittent patch therapy is superior to continuous therapy in improving exercise duration, but even continuous therapy may retain some effect. Rebound phenomena do occur but are clinically relevant only in a minority of the patients. Rebound phenomena are not a problem during continuous therapy, which therefore may be of value in patients with frequent and/or nocturnal angina attacks. Patients experiencing angina during exercise only and with low first-dose effects are likely to benefit more from intermittent therapy. Doses of 0.6-0.8 mg/hr (15-20 mg/24 hr) are usually optimal, and the efficacy is comparable with that observed after oral nitrates.