Urine-marking and the response to fresh vs. aged urine in wild and domestic Norway rats

The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates

Scent marking on top of (overmarking), or in the vicinity of, a scent mark already present is commonly termed countermarking. Scent marks and countermarks provide a continuous record of competitive challenges between conspecifics, thus providing a reliable advertisement of an individual's ability to dominate or defend an area to other competitors and potential mates. To test the hypothesis that females should prefer males that countermark competing scent marks in their territory over those whose own marks are partially countermarked by a competing male, we manipulated scent marks in the territories of neighbouring male house mice (captive-bred Mus domesticus). As predicted, oestrous females were more strongly attracted to approach territory owners that countermarked the scent mark challenges of competitors than those that had been countermarked, and females themselves deposited more scent marks near the scents of these males. To investigate whether female mice use scent age, overlap or intrinsic qualitative or quantitative differences between scent marks and countermarks to make this discrimination, we redeposited male scent marks artificially as marks and partially overlapping countermarks, with or without a 24-h age difference between them. While the intrinsic quality or quantity of countermarks did not affect discrimination, an age difference between the original mark and subsequent countermark was important for consistent discrimination. The ultimate function of such competitive scent signalling thus may be to provide potential mates with a reliable indicator of the competitive ability of individuals advertising their high status. Since scent marks remain in the environment and are continuously available to challenge and investigation, they may provide a particularly effective and reliable means of dominance advertisement. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Testosterone dose-dependency of sexual and nonsexual behaviors in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated male rat

The testosterone dose-dependency of several mating and nonmating behaviors was examined in the male rat, chemically castrated with a GnRH antagonist analog. Graded doses of testosterone enanthate (TE) were given to male rats to reinstate behaviors abolished by GnRH antagonist treatment. GnRH antagonist treatment alone markedly lowered serum LH, FSH and T concentrations and ventral prostate and testis weights. Open field behaviors were not significantly affected by GnRH antagonist treatment or castration. Scent-marking behavior was markedly suppressed by both castration and GnRH antagonist and restored by the lowest dose of TE (0.05 mg). All measures of male sexual behavior were impaired by GnRH antagonist treatment and castration and restored by the lowest dose of TE (0.05 mg). The doses of TE required to restore normal ventral prostate weights and testis weights were higher than those required to maintain scent marking and mating behaviors. No direct behavioral effects of the GnRH antagonist, other than those that can be explained by GnRH antagonist-induced suppression of testosterone were observed. The finding that sexual and nonsexual behaviors in the male rat have different testosterone requirements from those maintaining spermatogenesis and fertility may have significant implications for contraception.