Lactitol in treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. A meta-analysis

Novel Drugs for the Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy: Still a Long Journey to Travel

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is one of the reversible complications of chronic liver disease, associated with a higher mortality rate. In current clinical practice, treatment with rifaximin and lactulose/lactitol is the first line of treatment in HE. With the advance in pathophysiology, a new class of ammonia lowering drugs has been revealed to overcome the hurdle and disease burden. The mechanism of the novel agents differs significantly and includes the alteration in intestinal microbiota, intestinal endothelial integrity, oxidative stress, inflammatory markers, and modulation of neurotoxins. Most of the trials have reported promising results in the treatment and prevention of HE with fecal microbiota transplantation, albumin, probiotics, flumazenil, polyethylene glycol, AST-120, glycerol phenylbutyrate, nitazoxanide, branched-chain amino acid, naloxone, and acetyl-l-carnitine. However, their clinical use is limited due to the presence of major drawbacks in their study design, sample size, safety profile, bias, and heterogenicity. This study will discuss the novel therapeutic targets for HE in liver cirrhosis patients with supporting clinical trial data.

Novel Agents in the Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Review

Hepatic encephalopathy is an often devastating complication of chronic liver disease, associated with high mortality and increased burden on patients and healthcare systems. Current agents (such as nonabsorbable disaccharides and oral antibiotics) are often only partially effective and associated with unpleasant side effects. With our improved understanding of the pathophysiology of hepatic encephalopathy, multiple treatment modalities have emerged with promising results when used alone or as an adjunct to standard medications. The mechanisms of these agents vary greatly, and include the manipulation of gut microbial composition, reduction of oxidative stress, inhibition of inflammatory mediators, protection of endothelial integrity, modulation of neurotransmitter release and function, and other novel methods to reduce blood ammonia and neurotoxins. Despite their promising results, the studies assessing these treatment modalities are often limited by study design, sample size, outcome assessment heterogeneity, and paucity of data regarding their safety profiles. In this article, we discuss these novel agents in depth and provide the best evidence supporting their use, along with a critical look at their limitations and future directions.

L-carnitine reduces hospital admissions in patients with hepatic encephalopathy

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine whether oral L-carnitine administration reduces the blood ammonia concentration and number of hospital admissions for hepatic encephalopathy in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

METHODS

Of 68 patients with hepatic encephalopathy treated with oral L-carnitine supplementation from April 2013 to March 2016, we enrolled 19 patients who had received full standard treatment. We analyzed blood ammonia concentration, number of hospital admissions, and prognosis to determine how effective L-carnitine was in achieving mid-term to long-term suppression of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy.

RESULTS

Median blood ammonia concentrations at the start, 1 week, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks were 159, 79, 75, and 82 μg/dL, respectively. Blood ammonia concentrations 12 week, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks after L-carnitine administration were significantly lower than those at the start (P < 0.0001, respectively). During the 3 years prior to oral L-carnitine administration, the enrolled patients were hospitalized a total of 29 times for hepatic encephalopathy. However, during the 3 years following oral L-carnitine administration, they were admitted a total of six times for hepatic encephalopathy (P < 0.001). Median survival time was 40.9 months. Child-Pugh scores before and after oral L-carnitine administration differed significantly, whereas liver reserve function, nutritional status, and muscle index did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral L-carnitine administration is effective and free of adverse effects in patients with hyperammonemia and reduces the number of hospital admissions for hepatic encephalopathy.

Overt hepatic encephalopathy: management and prevention of recurrence

Most patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy are managed in an acute hospital setting. The mainstays of treatment are non-absorbable disaccharides, To prevent a recurrence, and thus further hospital admission, the focus is on identifying and avoiding precipitants, optimising nutrition and prescribing medication including rifaximin-α*†.

Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications

Prebiotics are a group of nutrients that are degraded by gut microbiota. Their relationship with human overall health has been an area of increasing interest in recent years. They can feed the intestinal microbiota, and their degradation products are short-chain fatty acids that are released into blood circulation, consequently, affecting not only the gastrointestinal tracts but also other distant organs. Fructo-oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides are the two important groups of prebiotics with beneficial effects on human health. Since low quantities of fructo-oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides naturally exist in foods, scientists are attempting to produce prebiotics on an industrial scale. Considering the health benefits of prebiotics and their safety, as well as their production and storage advantages compared to probiotics, they seem to be fascinating candidates for promoting human health condition as a replacement or in association with probiotics. This review discusses different aspects of prebiotics, including their crucial role in human well-being.

Hepatic encephalopathy: current challenges and future prospects

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of liver dysfunction, including acute liver failure and liver cirrhosis. HE presents as a spectrum of neuropsychiatric symptoms ranging from subtle fluctuating cognitive impairment to coma. It is a significant contributor of morbidity in patients with liver disease. HE is observed in acute liver failure, liver bypass procedures, for example, shunt surgry and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and cirrhosis. These are classified as Type A, B and C HE, respectively. HE can also be classified according to whether its presence is overt or covert. The pathogenesis is linked with ammonia and glutamine production, and treatment is based on mechanisms to reduce the formation and/or removal of these compounds. There is no specific diagnostic test for HE, and diagnosis is based on clinical suspicion, excluding other causes and use of clinical tests that may support its diagnosis. Many tests are used in trials and experimentally, but have not yet gained universal acceptance. This review focuses on the definitions, pathogenesis and treatment of HE. Consideration will be given to existing treatment, including avoidance of precipitating factors and novel therapies such as prebiotics, probiotics, antibiotics, laxatives, branched-chain amino acids, shunt embolization and the importance of considering liver transplant in appropriate cases.

Hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a reversible syndrome of impaired brain function occurring in patients with advanced liver diseases. The precise pathophysiology of HE is still under discussion; the leading hypothesis focus on the role of neurotoxins, impaired neurotransmission due to metabolic changes in liver failure, changes in brain energy metabolism, systemic inflammatory response and alterations of the blood brain barrier. HE produces a wide spectrum of nonspecific neurological and psychiatric manifestations. Minimal HE is diagnosed by abnormal psychometric tests. Clinically overt HE includes personality changes, alterations in consciousness progressive disorientation in time and space, somnolence, stupor and, finally, coma. Except for clinical studies, no specific tests are required for diagnosis. HE is classified according to the underlying disease, the severity of manifestations, its time course and the existence of precipitating factors. Treatment of overt HE includes supportive therapies, treatment of precipitating factors, lactulose and/or rifaximin. Routine treatment for minimal HE is only recommended for selected patients.

Carnitine dynamics and their effects on hyperammonemia in cirrhotic Japanese patients

AIM

Supplementation with levocarnitine preparations has been reported to improve hepatic encephalopathy, but no detailed investigations have addressed the dynamics of carnitine or its supplementation indication in cirrhosis patients. We studied carnitine dynamics in cirrhotic patients by measuring serum and liver tissue carnitine levels and tested the effects of levocarnitine supplementation on concurrent hyperammonemia.

METHODS

In a pilot cohort of seven patients with liver cirrhosis and five patients without cirrhosis, the serum and liver carnitine concentrations were measured. Then the serum carnitine fractions were analyzed in 70 liver cirrhosis patients. Among them, a levocarnitine preparation (1800 mg/day) was supplemented orally for 3 months in 27 patients with refractory hyperammonemia, and the effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was observed between serum and liver tissue carnitine concentrations (r = 0.69, P < 0.05). The serum total carnitine concentration was 68.4 ± 4.7 μmol/L, the free carnitine concentration was 53.2 ± 2.6 μmol/L, and the acylcarnitine concentration was 13.2 ± 1.1 μmol/L in 70 cirrhotic patients (reference values are 45-91, 36-74, 6-23 μmol/L, respectively). There was no correlation between blood ammonia and serum carnitine concentrations. The serum carnitine concentration rose with levocarnitine supplementation, reaching steady state after 1 month and, in parallel, refractory hyperammonemia was significantly improved. The cut-off level for a 20% decrease in blood ammonia was identified as 62.0 μmol/L total carnitine concentration by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, with an area under the curve of 0.69.

CONCLUSION

Serum carnitine concentrations were within standard levels in the majority of liver cirrhosis patients. In patients with concurrent hyperammonemia, the levocarnitine supplementation reduced blood ammonia levels.

Distant Site Effects of Ingested Prebiotics

The gut microbiome is being more widely recognized for its association with positive health outcomes, including those distant to the gastrointestinal system. This has given the ability to maintain and restore microbial homeostasis a new significance. Prebiotic compounds are appealing for this purpose as they are generally food-grade substances only degraded by microbes, such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, from which beneficial short-chain fatty acids are produced. Saccharides such as inulin and other fructo-oligosaccharides, galactooligosaccharides, and polydextrose have been widely used to improve gastrointestinal outcomes, but they appear to also influence distant sites. This review examined the effects of prebiotics on bone strength, neural and cognitive processes, immune functioning, skin, and serum lipid profile. The mode of action is in part affected by intestinal permeability and by fermentation products reaching target cells. As the types of prebiotics available diversify, so too will our understanding of the range of microbes able to degrade them, and the extent to which body sites can be impacted by their consumption.

Management of Neurologic Manifestations in Patients with Liver Disease

OPINION STATEMENT

Liver disease, both in its acute and chronic forms, can be associated with a wide spectrum of neurologic manifestations, both central and peripheral, ranging in severity from subclinical changes to neurocritical conditions. Neurologists are frequently consulted to participate in their management. In this review, we present an overview of management strategies for patients with hepatic disease whose clinical course is complicated by neurologic manifestations. Type A hepatic encephalopathy (HE), which occurs in acute liver failure, is a neurologic emergency, and multiple measures should be taken to prevent and treat cerebral edema. In Type C HE, which occurs in chronic liver disease, management should be aimed at correcting precipitant factors and hyperammonemia. There is an increasing spectrum of drug treatments available to minimize ammonia toxicity. Acquired hepatocerebral degeneration is a rare complication of the chronic form of HE, with typical clinical and brain MRI findings, whose most effective treatment is liver transplantation. Epilepsy is frequent and of multifactorial cause in patients with hepatic disease, and careful considerations should be made regarding choice of the appropriate anti-epileptic drugs. Several mechanisms increase the risk of stroke in hepatic disease, but many of the drugs used to treat and prevent stroke are contraindicated in severe hepatic failure. Hepatitis C infection increases the risk of ischemic stroke. Hemorrhagic stroke is more frequent in patients with liver disease of alcoholic etiology. Viral hepatitis is associated with a wide range of immune-mediated complications, mostly in the peripheral nervous system, which respond to different types of immunomodulatory treatment. Several drugs used to treat hepatic disease, such as the classical and the new direct-acting antivirals, may have neurologic complications which in some cases preclude its continued use.

Non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose and lactitol) are recommended as first-line treatment for hepatic encephalopathy. The previous (second) version of this review included 10 randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and eight RCTs evaluating lactulose versus lactitol for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy. The review found no evidence to either support or refute the use of the non-absorbable disaccharides and no differences between lactulose versus lactitol.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of i) non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and ii) lactulose versus lactitol in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We carried out electronic searches of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 10), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded to 19 October 2015; manual searches of meetings and conference proceedings; checks of bibliographies; and correspondence with investigators and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs, irrespective of publication status, language, or blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors, working independently, retrieved data from published reports and correspondence with investigators. The primary outcomes were mortality, hepatic encephalopathy, and serious adverse events. We presented the results of meta-analyses as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the quality of the evidence using 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) and bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains. Our analyses included regression analyses of publication bias and other small study effects, Trial Sequential Analyses to detect type 1 and type 2 errors, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 RCTs with a total of 1828 participants. Eight RCTs had a low risk of bias in the assessment of mortality. All trials had a high risk of bias in the assessment of the remaining outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis showed a beneficial effect of non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention on mortality when including all RCTs with extractable data (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.87; 1487 participants; 24 RCTs; I(2) = 0%; moderate quality evidence) and in the eight RCTs with a low risk of bias (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.97; 705 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis with the relative risk reduction (RRR) reduced to 30% confirmed the findings when including all RCTs, but not when including only RCTs with a low risk of bias or when we reduced the RRR to 22%. Compared with placebo/no intervention, the non-absorbable disaccharides were associated with beneficial effects on hepatic encephalopathy (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.69; 1415 participants; 22 RCTs; I(2) = 32%; moderate quality evidence). Additional analyses showed that non-absorbable disaccharides can help to reduce serious adverse events associated with the underlying liver disease including liver failure, hepatorenal syndrome, and variceal bleeding (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.60; 1487 participants; 24 RCTs; I(2) = 0%; moderate quality evidence). We confirmed the results in Trial Sequential Analysis. Tests for subgroup differences showed no statistical differences between RCTs evaluating prevention, overt, or minimal hepatic encephalopathy. The evaluation of secondary outcomes showed a potential beneficial effect of the non-absorbable disaccharides on quality of life, but we were not able to include the data in an overall meta-analysis (very low quality evidence). Non-absorbable disaccharides were associated with non-serious (mainly gastrointestinal) adverse events (very low quality evidence). None of the RCTs comparing lactulose versus lactitol evaluated quality of life. The review found no differences between lactulose and lactitol for the remaining outcomes (very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review includes a large number of RCTs evaluating the prevention or treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. The analyses found evidence that non-absorbable disaccharides may be associated with a beneficial effect on clinically relevant outcomes compared with placebo/no intervention.

Non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose and lactitol) are recommended as first-line treatment for hepatic encephalopathy. The previous (second) version of this review included 10 randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and eight RCTs evaluating lactulose versus lactitol for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy. The review found no evidence to either support or refute the use of the non-absorbable disaccharides and no differences between lactulose versus lactitol.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of i) non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and ii) lactulose versus lactitol in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We carried out electronic searches of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 10), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded to 19 October 2015; manual searches of meetings and conference proceedings; checks of bibliographies; and correspondence with investigators and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs, irrespective of publication status, language, or blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors, working independently, retrieved data from published reports and correspondence with investigators. The primary outcomes were mortality, hepatic encephalopathy, and serious adverse events. We presented the results of meta-analyses as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the quality of the evidence using 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) and bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains. Our analyses included regression analyses of publication bias and other small study effects, Trial Sequential Analyses to detect type 1 and type 2 errors, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 RCTs with a total of 1828 participants. Eight RCTs had a low risk of bias in the assessment of mortality. All trials had a high risk of bias in the assessment of the remaining outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis showed a beneficial effect of non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention on mortality when including all RCTs with extractable data (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.87; 1487 participants; 24 RCTs; I(2) = 0%; moderate quality evidence) and in the eight RCTs with a low risk of bias (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.97; 705 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis with the relative risk reduction (RRR) reduced to 30% confirmed the findings when including all RCTs, but not when including only RCTs with a low risk of bias or when we reduced the RRR to 22%. Compared with placebo/no intervention, the non-absorbable disaccharides were associated with beneficial effects on hepatic encephalopathy (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.69; 1415 participants; 22 RCTs; I(2) = 32%; moderate quality evidence). Additional analyses showed that non-absorbable disaccharides can help to reduce serious adverse events associated with the underlying liver disease including liver failure, hepatorenal syndrome, and variceal bleeding (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.60; 1487 participants; 24 RCTs; I(2) = 0%; moderate quality evidence). We confirmed the results in Trial Sequential Analysis. Tests for subgroup differences showed no statistical differences between RCTs evaluating prevention, overt, or minimal hepatic encephalopathy. The evaluation of secondary outcomes showed a potential beneficial effect of the non-absorbable disaccharides on quality of life, but we were not able to include the data in an overall meta-analysis (very low quality evidence). Non-absorbable disaccharides were associated with non-serious (mainly gastrointestinal) adverse events (very low quality evidence). None of the RCTs comparing lactulose versus lactitol evaluated quality of life. The review found no differences between lactulose and lactitol for the remaining outcomes (very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review includes a large number of RCTs evaluating the prevention or treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. The analyses found evidence that non-absorbable disaccharides may be associated with a beneficial effect on clinically relevant outcomes compared with placebo/no intervention.

Management Patterns of Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Nationwide Survey in India

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of cirrhosis. There is no standard practice for its management. This survey was done to determine the diagnostic and therapeutic practices of physicians treating patients with HE in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We designed a 21-item questionnaire, which was given to physicians working in academic and non-academic institutes and regularly treating patients with HE.

RESULTS

Of 500 printed questionnaires, we received 451 questionnaires [323 (72%) general physicians and 128 (28%) gastroenterologists] from academic and non-academic institutes. Commonest precipitating event of HE was upper gastrointestinal bleed (47%), constipation (18%) and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (12%). Arterial ammonia was always measured at admission by 156 (35%) physicians, never measured by 128 (28%) and sometimes by 167 (37%). Prophylactic antibiotics were used by 54% of physicians on the day of admission irrespective of any precipitating event, and 13% used antibiotics only if cultures were positive while others used antibiotics only if patient needs intubation or had variceal bleed as the cause of precipitation of HE. Disaccharides remained the mainstay of treatment in the management of HE and were always used by 87% (n = 391) followed by LOLA (n = 297, 66%) and rifaximin (n = 276, 61%). Combination of therapy was used by 84% of respondents. Lactulose enema was used in patients with HE by 280 (62%) physicians and was thought to be as good as giving lactulose by mouth or nasogastric tube in the treatment of HE. Regarding the recovery of HE with the present mode of therapy, of 451 responses, only 11% (n = 49) got 90-100% response to present therapy for the recovery of HE, while 70-90% response was seen by n = 152 (34%) and 50-70% response was seen by n = 183 (41%). Lactulose was prescribed as secondary prophylaxis agent more by gastroenterologists than non-gastroenterologists (76% vs 41%, P = 0.001). Similarly, rifaximin was more prescribed by gastroenterologists at discharge compared to non-gastroenterologists (32% vs 17%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Non-absorbable disaccharides are the most commonly prescribed treatment for HE and for secondary prophylaxis of HE. Combination of therapy (lactulose and LOLA or lactulose and rifaximin) was commonly used by treating physicians.

Management of overt hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is an important complication of cirrhosis with significant morbidity and mortality. Management of HE primarily involves avoidance of precipitating factors and administration of various ammonia-lowering therapies such as non-absorbable disaccharides, antimicrobial agents like rifaximin and l-ornithine l-aspartate. The non-absorbable disaccharides which include lactulose and lactitol are considered the first-line therapy for the treatment of HE and in primary and secondary prophylaxis of HE. Lactitol is comparable to lactulose in the treatment of HE with fewer side effects. Rifaximin is effective in treatment of HE and recent systemic reviews found it comparable to disaccharides and is effective in secondary prophylaxis of HE. Many agents like l-ornithine l-aspartate, probiotics, zinc, sodium benzoate have been tried either alone or in combination with lactulose for the treatment of HE. Combination therapy of disaccharides either with rifaximin, l-ornithine l-aspartate, probiotics for the treatment of HE needs further validation in large studies.

Disaccharides in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) primarily involves avoidance of precipitating factors and administration of various ammonia-lowering therapies such as nonabsorbable disaccharides and antimicrobial agents like rifaximin. The nonabsorbable disaccharides which include lactulose and lactitol are considered the first-line therapy for the treatment of HE and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). Lactulose significantly improves cognitive function and health-related quality of life in patients with MHE. Lactitol is comparable to lactulose in the treatment of HE with fewer side effects. Lactulose has also shown to be effective in primary and secondary prophylaxis of HE. Disaccharides were found to be comparable to rifaximin in recent systemic reviews in the treatment of HE however conclusion was based on inclusion of some poor quality trials. Combination therapy of disaccharides either with rifaximin, L-ornithine L-aspartate,probiotics for the treatment of HE needs further validation in large studies.

Primary prophylaxis of overt hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: an open labeled randomized controlled trial of lactulose versus no lactulose

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. Lactulose is used for the treatment of HE. There is no study on the prevention of overt HE using lactulose in patients who never had HE earlier.

METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotic patients who never had an episode of overt HE were randomized to receive lactulose (Gp-L) or no lactulose (Gp-NL). All patients were assessed by psychometry (number connection test [NCT-A and B], figure connection test if illiterate [FCT-A and B], digit symbol test [DST], serial dot test [SDT], line tracing test [LTT]) and critical flicker frequency test (CFF) at inclusion and after 3 months. These patients were followed every month for 12 months for development of overt HE.

RESULTS

Of 250 patients screened, 120 (48%) meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized to Gp-L (n = 60) and Gp-NL (n = 60). Twenty (19%) of 105 patients followed for 12 months developed an episode of overt HE. Six (11%) of 55 in the lactulose (Gp-L) group and 14 (28%) of 50 in the Gp-NL (P = 0.02) developed overt HE. Ten (20%) of 50 patients in Gp-NL and five (9%) of 55 patients in the Gp-L group died, P = 0.16. Number of patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) were comparable in two groups at baseline (Gp-L vs Gp-NL, 32:36, P = 0.29). Lactulose improved MHE in 66% of patients in Gp-L. Taking a cutoff < 38 Hz sensitivity and specificity of CFF in predicting HE were 52% and 77% at baseline and 52% and 82% at 3 months of treatment. On multivariate analysis, Child's score and presence of MHE at baseline were significantly associated with development of overt HE.

CONCLUSIONS

Lactulose is effective for primary prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.

Secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: an open-label, randomized controlled trial of lactulose, probiotics, and no therapy

OBJECTIVES

Lactulose is effective in secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Probiotics improves minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE), which predisposes to HE. No study has been conducted on the secondary prophylaxis of HE using probiotics. Our objective was to study the effects of lactulose and probiotics for secondary prophylaxis of HE.

METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotic patients who had recovered from HE were randomized to receive lactulose (Gp-L, 30 ml three times per day), three capsules of probiotics (Gp-P) per day containing 112.5 billion viable lyophilized bacteria per capsule, or no therapy (Gp-N). All patients were assessed by psychometry (number connection test (NCT-A, B), figure connection test if illiterate (FCT-A, B), digit symbol test (DST), and block design test (BDT)), critical flicker frequency (CFF) test, and arterial ammonia at inclusion. The patients were followed up monthly. The primary end point was development of overt HE according to West Haven criteria or a follow-up of 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 360 patients who recovered, 235 (65.2%) met the inclusion criteria (Gp-L, n=80; Gp-P, n=77; and Gp-N, n=78). In all, 38 patients (16.1%) were lost to follow-up and 77 patients developed HE (Gp-L, n=18; Gp-P, n=22; and Gp-N, n=37). There was a significant difference between Gp-L and Gp-N (P=0.001) and between Gp-P and Gp-N (P=0.02) but no difference between the Gp-L and Gp-P groups (P=0.349). The rate of readmission for causes other than HE (Gp-L, Gp-P, and Gp-N, 19:21:28; P=0.134) and deaths (Gp-L:Gp-P:Gp-N=13:11:16; P=0.56) in all three groups were similar. There was a high prevalence of abnormal psychometry test results (NCT-A, 71.5%; NCT-B, 69.2%; DST, 76.9%; and BDT, 85.2%), and FCT-A and -B were abnormal in 35 of 48 patients (72.7%). CFF was <38 Hz in 118 patients (50.2%). Upon multivariate analysis, recurrence of overt HE was significantly associated with two or more abnormal psychometric tests and arterial ammonia after the recovery of an episode of HE.

CONCLUSIONS

Lactulose and probiotics are effective for secondary prophylaxis of HE in patients with cirrhosis.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a neuropsychiatric disorder seen in patients with advanced liver disease or porto-systemic shunts. Based on etiology and severity of HE, the World Congress of Gastroenterology has divided HE into categories and sub-categories. Many user-friendly computer-based neuropsychiatric tests are being validated for diagnosing covert HE. Currently, emphasis is being given to view HE deficits as a continuous spectrum rather than distinct stages. Ammonia is believed to play crucial role in pathogenesis of HE via astrocyte swelling and cerebral edema. However, evidence has been building up which supports the synergistic role of oxidative stress, inflammation and neurosteroids in pathogenesis of HE. At present, treatment of HE aims at decreasing the production and intestinal absorption of ammonia. But as the role of new pathogenetic mechanisms becomes clear, many potential new treatment strategies may become available for clinician.

Profile of hepatic encephalopathy in children with cirrhosis and response to lactulose

BACKGROUND/AIM

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is associated with a poor prognosis. There is paucity of data on the treatment of HE with lactulose in children with cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive cirrhotic patients (<18 years) with HE was done. HE was defined according to West-Haven criteria. Response was defined as complete if patients recovered completely from HE, partial response was defined as improvement of encephalopathy by one or more grades from admission but not complete recovery, and defined as non response if patient did not show any improvement or deteriorated further even after 10 days of lactulose therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were admitted with cirrhosis and HE (278 adults and 22 children). Of 22 patients, 16 (73%) patients had complete response to lactulose and six (27%) patients did not [three (13.5%) patients worsened (non response) and three (13.5%) did not recover fully even after 10 days of treatment (partial response)]. Comparing baseline characteristics of patients who had complete response (n=16) versus partial (n=3) and non response (n=3), there was significant difference in mean arterial pressure (78.1±10.7 vs 62.6±5.0 mmHg, P=0.003), serum sodium (131.3±3.2 vs 126.5±5.2, P=0.01) and serum creatinine (0.78±0.3 vs 1.1±0.3 mg/dl, P=0.02). We did not find any difference in baseline characteristics of these patients regarding CTP score (9.6±1.2 vs 10.6±1.2), MELD score (17.6±2.9 vs 17.1±3.4), severity of HE (2.5±0.6 vs 2.6±0.5) and etiology of precipitating factors (P=0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Lactulose therapy causes complete recovery from hepatic encephalopathy in 73% of pediatrics patients with cirrhosis.

Predictors of nonresponse to lactulose in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lactulose is commonly used in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). However, all patients do not respond to lactulose. We evaluated predictors of nonresponse to lactulose in patients with cirrhosis and HE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotic patients with HE were enrolled. HE was diagnosed by West Haven criteria. Patients were treated with lactulose and correction of any associated precipitating factors. Nonresponse was defined if patient remained in HE even after 10 days of treatment or died while in HE.

RESULTS

Of 300 patients with cirrhosis and HE, 231 (77%) patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority (95%) of the patients had Grade 2 or 3 HE. Of 231 patients, 180 (78%) responded to lactulose. Fifty-one (22%) did not respond to lactulose, 34 (15%) died without any improvement in HE and HE did not improve in 17 (7%) patients after 10 days of therapy. On comparing baseline parameters between nonresponders versus responders there was significant difference between baseline age (42.0+/-11.9 vs. 46.6+/-12.7 year, P=0.02), total leukocyte count (median, 9300 vs. 7300 cells/mm3, P=0.001), serum sodium level (129.9+/-6.2 vs. 133.7+/-7.1 mmol/l, P=0.001), model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score (22.9+/-3.8 vs. 19.9+/-4.2, P=0.001), mean arterial pressure (MAP, 77.9+/-10.0 vs. 86.3+/-8.7 mmHg, P=0.001), serum AST (median, 114 vs. 76 IU/l, P=0.01), serum ALT (median, 84 vs. 48.5 IU/l, P=0.001), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [18 (35%) vs. 37 (21%), P=0.02] and hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC, 17 (33%) vs. 14 (7%), P=0.001]. On multivariate analysis baseline total leukocyte count, MELD, MAP, and HCC were independent predictors of nonresponse to lactulose (P=0.001). Combination of low MAP, high MELD, and presence of HCC had diagnostic accuracy of 81% in predicting nonresponse to lactulose.

CONCLUSION

Of 78% patients with chronic liver disease with HE (majority with Grade 2 and 3) responded to lactulose. High baseline MELD, high total leukocyte count, low serum sodium, low MAP, and presence of hepatocellular carcinoma were predictors of nonresponse to lactulose.

Current concepts in the assessment and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is defined as a metabolically induced, potentially reversible, functional disturbance of the brain that may occur in acute or chronic liver disease. Standardized nomenclature has been proposed but a standardized approach to the treatment, particularly of persistent, episodic and recurrent encephalopathy associated with liver cirrhosis has not been proposed. This review focuses on the pathogenesis and treatment of HE in patients with cirrhosis. The pathogenesis and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in fulminant hepatic failure is quite different and is reviewed elsewhere.

Secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy: an open-label randomized controlled trial of lactulose versus placebo

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is associated with a poor prognosis. Lactulose is used for the treatment of HE. There is no study on the prevention of recurrence of HE using lactulose.

METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotic patients who recovered from HE were randomized to receive lactulose (HE-L group) or placebo (HE-NL group). All patients were assessed by psychometry (number connection test [NCT-A and B], figure connection test if illiterate [FCT-A and B], digit symbol test [DST], and object assembly test [OAT]), critical flicker frequency test, and blood ammonia at inclusion. Primary end point was development of overt HE.

RESULTS

Of 300 patients with HE who recovered, 140 (46.6%) met the inclusion criteria and were included. There was a high prevalence of abnormal psychometry test results (NCT-A, 67.5%; NCT-B, 62.5%; DST, 70%; and OAT, 80%), and FCT-A and B were abnormal in 10 of 14 patients. Critical flicker frequency was <38 Hz in 77 patients (55%). Twelve (19.6%) of 61 patients in the HE-L group and 30 (46.8%) of 64 in the HE-NL group (P = .001) developed HE over a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 1-20 months). Readmission rate due to causes other than HE (HE-L vs HE-NL, 9:6; P = NS) and deaths (HE-L vs HE-NL, 5:11; P = .18) in 2 groups were similar. Recurrence of overt HE was significantly associated with 2 or more abnormal psychometric tests after the recovery of an episode of HE (r = 0.369, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Lactulose is effective for prevention of recurrence of HE in patients with cirrhosis.

Review article: the current pharmacological therapies for hepatic encephalopathy

Effective treatment options for hepatic encephalopathy are limited. Based on the principle that intestinal-derived ammonia contributes to the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy, current therapeutic approaches are directed at reducing bacterial production of ammonia and enhancing its elimination. Non-absorbable disaccharides are first-line therapy for hepatic encephalopathy, but published clinical studies evaluating their safety and efficacy are limited. Alternative therapies such as benzodiazepine receptor antagonists, branched-chain amino acids, and l-ornithine-l-aspartate also have limited clinical data supporting their use. Studies of antibiotics indicate that they are effective in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy, but adverse effects and concerns about long-term safety have limited the widespread use of most. Rifaximin is a minimally absorbed antibiotic that concentrates in the gastrointestinal tract and is excreted mostly unchanged in faeces. It has been studied extensively in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy and appears to confer therapeutic benefits greater than those of placebo and non-absorbable disaccharides and at least comparable with those of systemic antibiotics. Rifaximin was also well tolerated in patients with hepatic encephalopathy and is not associated with clinical drug interactions or clinically relevant bacterial antibiotic resistance. In conclusion, non-absorbed antibiotics such as rifaximin offer a favourable benefit-risk ratio in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy and may help to improve patient outcomes.

Effects of lactitol on intestinal microflora and plasma endotoxin in patients with chronic viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of lactitol on intestinal flora and the levels of plasma endotoxin in patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

METHODS

Sixty patients with chronic viral hepatitis and gut-derived endotoxemia were randomly divided into two groups: lactitol group (n=30) and control group (n=30). Patients in the control group received standard medical treatment for 3 weeks, while patients in the lactitol group received lactitol orally in addition to the standard medical treatment. Fecal flora and plasma endotoxin were measured before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

In the lactitol group, the numbers of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus per gram of wet feces were significantly increased (p<0.01) and Clostridium perfringens count was decreased markedly (p<0.001). The levels of plasma endotoxin decreased after the treatment from 72.89 ng/L to 33.33 ng/L in the lactitol group and from 66.00 ng/L to 51.07 ng/L in the control group, but the plasma endotoxin levels in the lactitol group decreased far more than in the control group (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Lactitol can decrease the levels of plasma endotoxin more effectively than standard medical treatment in patients with chronic viral hepatitis through improving intestinal microflora.

Non-absorbable disaccharides for hepatic encephalopathy: systematic review of randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose and lactitol) in patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group controlled trials register, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase until March 2003; reference lists of relevant articles; authors and pharmaceutical companies.

REVIEW METHODS

Randomised trials that compared non-absorbable disaccharides with placebo, no intervention, or antibiotics for hepatic encephalopathy were included. The primary outcome measures were no improvement of hepatic encephalopathy and all cause mortality.

RESULTS

22 trials were included. Compared with placebo or no intervention, non-absorbable disaccharides seemed to reduce the risk of no improvement in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (relative risk 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.84, six trials). However, high quality trials found no significant effect (0.92, 0.42 to 2.04, two trials). Compared with placebo or no intervention, non-absorbable disaccharides had no significant effect on mortality (0.41, 0.02 to 8.68, four trials). Non-absorbable disaccharides were inferior to antibiotics in reducing the risk of no improvement (1.24, 1.02 to 1.50, 10 trials) and lowering blood ammonia concentration (weighted mean difference 2.35 micromol/l, 0.06 micromol/l to 13.45 micromol/l, 10 trials). There was no significant difference in mortality (0.90, 0.48 to 1.67, five trials).

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of non-absorbable disaccharides for hepatic encephalopathy. Antibiotics were superior to non-absorbable disaccharides in improving hepatic encephalopathy, but it is unclear whether this difference is clinically important. Non-absorbable disaccharides should not serve as comparator in randomised trials on hepatic encephalopathy.

Nonabsorbable disaccharides for hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Nonabsorbable disaccharides (lactulose or lactitol) are considered the treatment of choice for hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of nonabsorbable disaccharides for patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (March 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003/03), EMBASE (1980 to 2003/03), manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing lactulose or lactitol versus no intervention, placebo, or antibiotics and trials comparing lactulose versus lactitol for hepatic encephalopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures included no improvement of hepatic encephalopathy and all-cause mortality. Binary outcomes are reported as relative risks (RR) based on a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed with regard to methodological quality and form of hepatic encephalopathy.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty trials assessed nonabsorbable disaccharides versus placebo, no intervention, or antibiotics or assessed lactulose versus lactitol. We could not extract data from all trials. Compared with placebo or no intervention, nonabsorbable disaccharides had no statistically significant effect on mortality (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 8.68, four trials), but appeared to reduce the risk of no improvement of hepatic encephalopathy (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84, six trials). However, this result may reflect bias due to low methodological quality of the majority of included trials. Trials of high methodological quality found no significant effect of nonabsorbable disaccharides on the risk of no improvement (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.04, two trials). We found no statistically significant difference between lactulose and lactitol on mortality (two trials) or risk of no improvement (four trials). However, our meta-analyses were underpowered to establish whether these treatments have comparable effect. Nonabsorbable disaccharides appeared to be inferior to antibiotics on reducing the risk of no improvement (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.50, 10 trials).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review questions the beneficial effects of nonabsorbable disaccharides and highlights that there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support this treatment. We found that antibiotics appeared to be superior to nonabsorbable disaccharides in improving hepatic encephalopathy, but it is unclear whether this difference in treatment effect is clinically important to patients. Nonabsorbable disaccharides should not serve as comparator in randomised trials on hepatic encephalopathy.

Drug treatment of the complications of cirrhosis in the older adult

Several age-related changes occur in the structure and functions of the liver. The volume of the liver decreases, despite an increase in the size of hepatocytes, suggesting loss of liver cells. There are decreases in hepatic blood flow, the synthesis of urea and cholesterol, and the metabolism of drugs. Moreover, the regenerative capacity of liver becomes less efficient. Certain caveats are important when treating older patients with liver disease. Strict dietary restrictions, such as a low protein diet, should be avoided in the elderly (unless the patient is encephalopathic) because these patients are often undernourished to start with. Similarly, strict salt restriction should be enforced with caution, since it makes food less palatable and may take away what little desire such patients have to eat. Diuretic doses should be adjusted carefully because of greater risks of azotaemia and electrolyte disturbances in the elderly. Extra vigilance should be exercised in the early detection of infections that are more likely to occur in patients with cirrhosis. For example, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis can be missed in the elderly because of poor systemic (fever, abdominal tenderness) and laboratory responses (leucocytosis). In patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding, it is better to err on the side of underhydration than overhydration because of the risk of congestive heart failure. Vasopressin should be avoided in the elderly, since this drug has a high probability of precipitating an ischaemic event. Older patients do not tolerate beta-blockers as well as younger individuals and may require other treatment strategies for the prevention of variceal rebleeding episodes. Hepatic encephalopathy, especially the milder form, needs careful assessment because it can be easily confused with senile dementia syndromes. Cirrhosis is a premalignant condition and patients are at increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a tumour seen predominantly in the elderly. All patients with cirrhosis should be maintained on a lifelong screening programme consisting of a 6-monthly assessment of alpha-fetoprotein and an imaging study, since early detection provides the only hope for cure of HCC. The only definitive treatment of cirrhosis is liver transplantation. Advanced age is not a contraindication to transplantation, and survival in older patients (aged >60 years) is comparable to that in younger individuals.

Hepatic Encephalopathy

1. Acute Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis A. GENERAL MEASURES. Tracheal intubation in patients with deep encephalopathy should be considered. A nasogastric tube is placed for patients in deep encephalopathy. Avoid sedatives whenever possible. Correction of the precipitating factor is the most important measure. B. SPECIFIC MEASURES i. Nutrition. In case of deep encephalopathy, oral intake is withheld for 24-48 h and i.v. glucose is provided until improvement. Enteral nutrition can be started if the patient appears unable to eat after this period. Protein intake begins at a dose of 0.5 g/kg/day, with progressive increase to 1-1.5 g/kg/day. ii. Lactulose is administered via enema or nasogastric tube in deep encephalopathy. The oral route is optimized by dosing every hour until stool evacuation appears. Lactulose can be replaced by oral neomycin. iii. Flumazenil may be used in selected cases of suspected benzodiazepine use. 2. Chronic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis i. Avoidance and prevention of precipitating factors, including the institution of prophylactic measures. ii. Nutrition. Improve protein intake by feeding dairy products and vegetable-based diets. Oral branched-chain amino acids can be considered for individuals intolerant of all protein. iii. Lactulose. Dosing aims at two to three soft bowel movements per day. Antibiotics are reserved for patients who respond poorly to disaccharides or who do not exhibit diarrhea or acidification of the stool. Chronic antibiotic use (neomycin, metronidazole) requires careful renal, neurological, and/or otological monitoring. iv. Refer for liver transplantation in appropriate candidates. For problematic encephalopathy (nonresponsive to therapy), consider imaging of splanchnic vessels to identify large spontaneous portal-systemic shunts potentially amenable to radiological occlusion. In addition, consider the combination of lactulose and neomycin, addition of oral zinc, and invasive approaches, such as occlusion of TIPS or surgical shunts, if present. Minimal or Subclinical Encephalopathy Treatment can be instituted in selected cases. The most characteristic neuropsychological deficits in patients with cirrhosis are in motor and attentional skills (60). Although these may impact the ability to perform daily activities, many subjects can compensate for these defects. Recent studies suggest a small but significant impact of these abnormalities on patients' quality of life (61), including difficulties with sleep (62). In patients with significant deficits or complaints, a therapeutic program based on dietary manipulations and/or nonabsorbable disaccharides may be tried. Benzodiazepines should not be used for patients with sleep difficulties.

Hepatic encephalopathy in liver cirrhosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management

The pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is unknown. Many theories have been proposed. Most established therapies are based on such theories but since no theory has have ever been proved, therapies have to be considered empiric. The spectrum of HE ranges from minimal cerebral functional deficits, which can only be found by sensitive psychometric tests, to coma with signs of decerebration. HE has arbitrarily been divided into stages. A number of precipitating factors are known and the first line of therapy should always be the elimination of these factors. The differential diagnosis includes all states of impaired consciousness and deficits in cerebral function in patients with chronic liver disease, and clinical and biochemical tests to differentiate are indicated. The therapeutic options for HE include: protein restriction only for a limited time in comatous patients; nonabsorbable antibiotics (aminoglycosides), which because of adverse effects are also limited to higher grades of HE: intestinal cleansing which is applicable in all degrees of HE; lactulose, branched chain aminoacids and ornithin aspartate which have been proven to be effective and can be applied long term in patients with lower grades of HE.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy arises from the combination of hepatocellular dysfunction and portal-systemic shunting. Encephalopathy is more prominent in advanced stages of liver cirrhosis and signals the presence of fulminant hepatic failure in patients with acute liver injury. As important as the extent of shunting is the presence of large spontaneous collaterals. Ammonia continues to be a leading toxin influencing brain function. Endogenous benzodiazepines and cytokines may contribute to one of ammonia's key effects in the brain: astrocyte swelling. The diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy is a diagnosis of exclusion; the search for a precipitating factor should be started immediately in all cases of encephalopathy. The treatment of hepatic encephalopathy has three aims: decrease the nitrogenous load from the gut, improve the extra-intestinal elimination of ammonia and counteract central abnormalities of neurotransmission. The mainstay of treatment is directed at the colon. Newer approaches targeting the brain, such as flumazenil, have become available.

Effect of lactitol on blood ammonia response to oral glutamine challenge in cirrhotic patients: evidence for an effect of nonabsorbable disaccharides on small intestine ammonia generation

OBJECTIVE

Nonabsorbable disaccharides are widely used to decrease blood ammonia concentration. Their principal mode of action is the modification of pH and bacterial flora in the colon. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that these drugs may also reduce small intestine ammonia generation.

METHODS

Eight male cirrhotics without overt hepatic encephalopathy received 20 g of glutamine in 100 ml of water. Venous samples for whole blood ammonia were taken before, 30 and 60 min after the load. Immediately after the last blood sample the patients were submitted to the following psychometric tests: number connection test, Posner's attention test, and Sternberg paradigm. After the first glutamine load, patients were started on lactitol (initial dose 20 g, three times a day). Once two bowel movements/day were obtained and maintained for at least 5 days, oral glutamine challenge and psychometric tests were repeated.

RESULTS

Ammonia increased significantly after the glutamine load (from 83 +/- 13 to 164 +/- 30 microg/dl at 30 min and 210 +/- 29 microg/dl at 60 min; mean +/- SE; p = 0.006 analysis of variance) but not after glutamine load after lactitol treatment (from 77 +/- 17 to 111 +/- 21 microg/dl and 142 +/- 24 microg/dl; p = not significant). The peak increment (127 +/- 24 vs 65 +/- 18 microg/dl; p = 0.008) of ammonia elevation was significantly smaller during lactitol administration. The patients' psychometric performance after the glutamine load did not differ significantly after lactitol treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lactitol reduces the elevation in blood ammonia that follows oral glutamine challenge. Because enterally administered glutamine is efficiently absorbed in the jejunum and, in part, metabolized to ammonia we suggest that lactitol affects small intestine ammonia generation probably by shortening the residence time of intestinal contents.

Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis

AIMS

To evaluate biofeedback training in children with encopresis and the effect on psychosocial function.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled randomised study. PATIENT INTERVENTIONS: A multimodal treatment of six weeks. Children were randomised into two groups. Each group received dietary and toilet advice, enemas, oral laxatives, and anorectal manometry. One group also received five biofeedback training sessions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Successful treatment was defined as less than two episodes of encopresis, regular bowel movements, and no laxatives. Psychosocial function after treatment was assessed using the Child Behaviour Checklist.

RESULTS

Children given laxatives and biofeedback training had higher success rates than those who received laxatives alone (39% v 19%) at the end of the intervention period. At 12 and 18 months, however, approximately 50% of children in each group were successfully treated. Abnormal behaviour scores were initially observed in 35% of children. Most children had improved behaviour scores six months after treatment. Children with an initial abnormal behaviour score who were successfully treated had a significant improvement in their behavioural profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Biofeedback training had no additional effect on the success rate or behaviour scores. Psychosocial problems are present in a subgroup of children with encopresis. The relation between successful treatment and improvement in behavioural function supports the idea that encopresis has an aetiological role in the occurrence and maintenance of behavioural problems in children with encopresis.

Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND

Because abnormal defaecation dynamics, which can be modified by biofeedback, are considered to be the underlying problem in constipation, biofeedback training may be a useful treatment for constipation. This treatment has mainly been studied in uncontrolled trials. We evaluated defaecation dynamics and clinical outcome in chronically constipated children in a randomised study comparing conventional treatment and conventional treatment with biofeedback training.

METHODS

Patients, 5 to 16 years old, were referred to the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam by general practitioners, school doctors, paediatricians, and psychiatrists. They had to fulfil at least two of four criteria for paediatric constipation and were included if they had been treated medically for at least one month before randomisation. Patients had a medical history, abdominal and rectal examination, and anorectal manometry at the start and end of the 6-week intervention period. The conventional group received laxative treatment with additional dietary advice, toilet training, and maintenance of a diary of bowel habits. The biofeedback group received the same conventional treatment and additionally five biofeedback training sessions. During the first 3 weeks, patients visited the outpatient clinic weekly; two subsequent visits were twice monthly.

FINDINGS

94 patients were randomised to conventional treatment (CT) and 98 to conventional treatment with additional biofeedback training (CT+BF). Normal defaecation dynamics increased in the CT group from 41% to 52% (not significant) and in the CT+BF group from 38% to 86% (p = 0.001). At 6 weeks, more patients in the CT+BF group showed normal defaecation dynamics, compared to the CT group (p < 0.001). This result was unaltered by controlling for baseline status in a logistic regression model. At 1 year, successful treatment (defaecation frequency > or = 3/week, soiling and/or encopresis < 2/month, and no laxatives) was accomplished in 59% of the CT and 50% of the CT+BF group (p = 0.24). The results were maintained after 1 1/2 years follow-up. No association was found between achievement of normal defaecation dynamics and clinical outcome.

INTERPRETATION

Additional biofeedback training compared to conventional therapy did not result in higher success rates in chronically constipated children. Furthermore, achievement of normal defaecation dynamics was not associated with success: abnormal defaecation dynamics seem not to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of childhood constipation. Intensive conventional laxative treatment should remain the first choice in chronically constipated children.

Hepatic disorders. Features and appropriate management

The spectrum of liver disease is extremely wide, with many of the underlying disorders having acute and chronic presentations. Most of the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are accounted for by autoimmune disease, viral infection and toxic insult. The management strategy of any liver disease is a combination of treating the symptoms and complications that arise, as well as drug therapies relevant to the specific underlying diagnosis. Encephalopathy, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleeding and pruritus are the main complications at which drug therapy is directed, although in some cases it represents only 1 aspect of the overall management. Drug therapy per se is largely ineffective in acute liver failure with the possible exception of acetylcysteine, but many drugs are used in the management of the constituent components of this complex medical emergency. Treatments for specific liver conditions are expanding, especially in the areas of autoimmune and viral disease. The increasing availability and success of liver transplantation has tended to change the emphasis of management, and it is often not appropriate to exhaust the treatment options before referring the patient for transplantation. A comprehensive review of all liver disease is beyond the scope of this article, but hopefully the important principles of management and commonly occurring clinical decisions are discussed.