Comparison of media for agar dilution susceptibility testing of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis

Pharmacotherapy for Bordetella pertussis infection. I. A synthesis of laboratory sciences

There is considerable history and practice experience both with laboratory susceptibility testing for Bordetella pertussis and clinical treatment. This two-part narrative review provides a synthesis of the laboratory and clinical sciences as they apply to this bacterium and the clinical consequences of treating infection. It is generally held that antibiotic susceptibility testing for B. pertussis is not sufficiently standardised, but there has not been an urgent need to consolidate the same given the lack global experience with major resistance profiles. Experience in China, however, has provided concern for high-level macrolide resistance. The nature of and frequency of such resistance has raised the bar for reconsideration of susceptibility testing given that first-line treatment may be regionally compromised. Disk diffusion and Etest susceptibility testing can be recommended for screening resistance among individual isolates of B. pertussis and on an ad hoc manner. Disk diffusion, Etest and/or critical agar dilution testing can be recommended for large-scale studies. Standards for inoculum, growth atmosphere, timing of interpretation, preferred testing media and controls can be extrapolated from the publications to date. Such methods should be able to detect high-level resistance to several antibiotics, but especially macrolides. Concern for intermediate-susceptible categories requires consideration as well as the correlation with bacteriological and clinical outcomes. Provisional standards can be applied at this time, and modification or fine-tuning of any such standards are open to future investigation.

In Vitro Activity of Solithromycin against Bordetella pertussis, an Emerging Respiratory Pathogen

There has been an increase in the number of pertussis cases reported since the introduction of the acellular pertussis vaccine. While children that present with pertussis have a characteristic whooping cough, adults can simply have a persistent, nonspecific cough and remain undiagnosed. Macrolide antibiotics, such as azithromycin, are the currently recommended treatment for pertussis. Solithromycin is a new macrolide and the first fluoroketolide with broad activity against a wide spectrum of bacterial pathogens and has completed clinical development for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. This study reports the potent in vitro activity of solithromycin against a collection of recent isolates of Bordetella pertussis.

Comparison of three media for agar dilution susceptibility testing of Bordetella pertussis using six antibiotics

Since antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the fastidious species Bordetella pertussis is not standardized, the most suitable medium for agar dilution testing of this species has not yet been determined. In the present study, Mueller-Hinton, Bordet-Gengou, and Oxoid charcoal agars (each supplemented with 5% horse blood) were evaluated for agar dilution susceptibility testing of Bordetella pertussis against ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Mueller-Hinton agar was the most suitable medium.

In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to two ketolides (HMR 3004 and HMR 3647), four macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, and roxithromycin), and two ansamycins (rifampin and rifapentine)

When tested by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood, the ketolides HMR 3004 and HMR 3647 were slightly more active (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC90], 0.03 microg/ml) against Bordetella pertussis than azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, and roxithromycin. Azithromycin (MIC90, 0.06 microg/ml) was the most active compound against B. parapertussis. Rifampin and rifapentine were considerably less active.

Comparison of Etest and agar dilution for testing the activity of three macrolides against Bordetella parapertussis

Agar dilution and Etest using Mueller-Hinton II agar supplemented with 5% whole defibrinated horse blood were compared for testing the activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin against 34 clinical isolates of the fastidious species Bordetella parapertussis. There was good overall agreement (100.0% within +/- 1 log2 dilution step) between both methods. The Etest offers an excellent and convenient alternative to agar dilution for testing the activities of macrolides against B. parapertussis.

In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to four fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin), cefpirome, and meropenem

The in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, cefpirome, and meropenem against 34 clinical isolates each of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis were determined by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood. Levofloxacin was as active as ciprofloxacin against both species (MIC, 0.06 microgram/ml) and more active than ofloxacin and d-ofloxacin. Cefpirome was more active against B. pertussis (MIC, 1.0 microgram/ml) than against B. parapertussis (MIC, > 2 micrograms/ml), while the reverse was true for meropenem (MIC, 2.0 micrograms/ml against B. pertussis and 1.0 microgram/ml against B. parapertussis).