Emergence of a dominant cytotoxic T lymphocyte antitumor effector from tumor-infiltrating cells in the anterior chamber of the eye

Prognostic Implications of Novel Ten-Gene Signature in Uveal Melanoma

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults. Genomic studies have provided insights into molecular subgroups and oncogenic drivers of UM that may lead to novel therapeutic strategies. Methods: Dataset TCGA-UVM, download from TCGA portal, were taken as the training cohort, and dataset GSE22138, obtained from GEO database, was set as the validation cohort. In training cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression model were applied to preliminary screen prognostic genes. Besides, the Cox regression model with LASSO was implemented to build a multi-gene signature, which was then validated in the validation cohorts through Kaplan-Meier, Cox, and ROC analyses. In addition, the correlation between copy number aberrations and risk score was evaluated by Spearman test. GSEA and immune infiltrating analyses were conducted for understanding function annotation and the role of the signature in the tumor microenvironment. Results: A ten-gene signature was built, and it was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis revealing that significantly overall survival, progression-free survival, and metastasis-free survival difference was seen. The ten-gene signature was further proven to be an independent risk factor compared to other clinic-pathological parameters via the Cox regression analysis. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis results demonstrated a better predictive power of the UM prognosis that our signature owned. The ten-gene signature was significantly correlated with copy numbers of chromosome 3, 8q, 6q, and 6p. Furthermore, GSEA and immune infiltrating analyses showed that the signature had close interactions with immune-related pathways and the tumor environment. Conclusions: Identifying the ten-gene signature (SIRT3, HMCES, SLC44A3, TCTN1, STPG1, POMGNT2, RNF208, ANXA2P2, ULBP1, and CA12) could accurately identify patients' prognosis and had close interactions with the immunodominant tumor environment, which may provide UM patients with personalized prognosis prediction and new treatment insights.

Immunobiology of Uveal Melanoma: State of the Art and Therapeutic Targets

Uveal Melanoma (UM) represents the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Although it originates from melanocytes as cutaneous melanoma, it shows significant clinical and biological differences with the latter, including high resistance to immune therapy. Indeed, UM can evade immune surveillance via multiple mechanisms, such as the expression of inhibitory checkpoints (e.g., PD-L1, CD47, CD200) and the production of IDO-1 and soluble FasL, among others. More in-depth understanding of these mechanisms will suggest potential targets for the design of novel and more effective management strategies for UM patients.

IFN-γ-independent intraocular tumor rejection is mediated by a macrophage-dependent process that leaves the eye intact

Intraocular tumors reside in an immune-privileged site, yet in certain circumstances, they can undergo immune rejection. Ocular tumor rejection can follow one of two pathways. One pathway is CD4(+) T cell-dependent and culminates in ischemic necrosis of the tumor and phthisis (atrophy) of the eye. A second pathway is also CD4(+) T cell-dependent but does not inflict collateral injury to ocular tissues, and the eye is preserved. We isolated two clones of a murine tumor, Ad5E1 that undergo profoundly different forms of immune rejection in the eye. Clone 2.1 tumors undergo an ischemic necrotizing form of rejection that requires IFN-γ, T cells, and ocular macrophages and culminates in destruction of the eye. By contrast, the second clone of Ad5E1, clone 4, undergoes rejection that also requires T cells and ocular macrophages, but leaves the eye in pristine condition (nonphthisical rejection). Here, we demonstrate that nonphthisical tumor rejection of clone 4 tumors is IFN-γ-independent but requires an ocular macrophage population that contains M1 and M2 macrophages. Clone 4 tumor-bearing eyes displayed ten- and 15-fold increases in M2- and M1-associated markers Arg1 and NO2, respectively. This is in sharp contrast to previous results with clone 2.1 tumor rejection, in which M2 markers were undetectable, and the eye was destroyed. These results suggest that the presence of M2 macrophages tempers the immune rejection of intraocular tumors and promotes immune effectors that inflict minimal injury to innocent bystander cells and thereby preserve the integrity and function of the eye.

IL-17-dependent, IFN-gamma-independent tumor rejection is mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and occurs at extraocular sites, but is excluded from the eye

Although intraocular tumors reside in an immune-privileged site where immune responses are suppressed, some tumors are rejected. An example of this is the rejection of intraocular adenovirus-induced (adenovirus type 5 early region 1 [Ad5E1]) tumors in C57BL/6 mice. We previously identified an Ad5E1 tumor clone in which the rejection is IFN-γ dependent and culminates in the destruction of both the tumor and the eye. Although Ad5E1 tumors are not rejected when transplanted into the eyes of IFN-γ KO mice, they are rejected after s.c. transplantation. Thus, outside of the eye Ad5E1 tumors elicit a form of tumor immunity that is IFN-γ independent. In this article, we demonstrate that IFN-γ-independent s.c. rejection requires both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Furthermore, s.c. tumor rejection requires IL-17, which is produced by IFN-γ-deficient CD4(+) T cells in response to tumor Ags (TAs). Splenocytes from CD4-depleted IFN-γ KO mice produce significantly less IL-17 compared with splenocytes from isotype-treated IFN-γ KO animals in response to TAs. Furthermore, depletion of IL-17 decreases CTL activity against Ad5E1 tumor cells. In this model we propose that, in the absence of IFN-γ, CD4(+) T cells produce IL-17 in response to TAs, which increases CTL activity that mediates tumor rejection; however, this does not occur in the eye. IL-6 production within the eye is severely reduced, which is consistent with the failure to induce Th17 cells within the intraocular tumors. In contrast, the s.c. environment is replete with IL-6 and supports the induction of Th17 cells. Therefore, IFN-γ-independent tumor rejection is excluded from the eye and may represent a newly recognized form of ocular immune privilege.

Immune privilege of corneal allografts

Corneal transplantation has been performed successfully for over 100 years. Normally, HLA typing and systemic immunosuppressive drugs are not utilized, yet 90% of corneal allografts survive. In rodents, corneal allografts representing maximal histoincompatibility enjoy >50% survival even without immunosuppressive drugs. By contrast, other categories of transplants are invariably rejected in such donor/host combinations. The acceptance of corneal allografts compared to other categories of allografts is called immune privilege. The cornea expresses factors that contribute to immune privilege by preventing the induction and expression of immune responses to histocompatibility antigens on the corneal allograft. Among these are soluble and cell membrane molecules that block immune effector elements and also apoptosis of T lymphocytes. However, some conditions rob the corneal allograft of its immune privilege and promote rejection, which remains the leading cause of corneal allograft failure. Recent studies have examined new strategies for restoring immune privilege to such high-risk hosts.

Immune escape mechanisms of intraocular tumors

The notion that the immune system might control the growth of tumors was suggested over 100 years ago by the eminent microbiologist Paul Ehrlich. This concept was refined and expanded by Burnet and Thomas 50 years later with their articulation of the "immune surveillance" hypothesis. In its simplest form, the immune surveillance hypothesis suggests that neoplasms arise spontaneously and express novel antigens that are recognized by the immune system, which either eliminates the tumors or restrains their growth. Within the eye, immune responses are controlled and sometimes profoundly inhibited - a condition known as immune privilege. Immune privilege in the eye is the result of a complex array of anatomical, physiological, and immunoregulatory mechanisms that prevent the induction and expression of many immune responses. Tumors arising in the eye would seem to have an advantage in evading immune surveillance due to ocular immune privilege. Uveal melanoma, the most common and malignant intraocular tumor in adults, not only benefits from the immune privilege of the eye but also has adopted many of the mechanisms that contribute to ocular immune privilege as a strategy for protecting uveal melanoma cells once they leave the sanctuary of the eye and are disseminated systemically in the form of metastases. Although the immune system possesses a battery of effector mechanisms designed to rid the body of neoplasms, tumors are capable of rapidly evolving and countering even the most sophisticated immunological effector mechanisms. To date, tumors seem to be winning this arms race, but an increased understanding of these mechanisms should provide insights for designing immunotherapy that was envisioned over half a century ago, but has failed to materialize to date.

CD4+ T-cell-dependent tumour rejection in an immune-privileged environment requires macrophages

Although intraocular tumours reside in an immune-privileged site, they can circumvent immune privilege and undergo rejection. Ocular tumour rejection typically follows one of two pathways. One pathway involves CD4+ T cells, delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), and culmination in ischemic necrosis of the tumour and phthisis (atrophy) of the eye. The second pathway is DTH-independent and does not inflict collateral injury to ocular tissues, and the eye is preserved. In this study, we used a well-characterized tumour, Ad5E1, to investigate the role of CD4+ T cells in the non-phthisical form of intraocular tumour rejection. It has been previously documented that CD4+ T cells and interferon (IFN)-gamma are necessary for rejection of these tumours in the eye. In this study, we demonstrate that CD4+ T cells can circumvent immune privilege and infiltrate intraocular Ad5E1 tumours. Following tumour rejection, CD4+ T cells from tumour rejector mice could be adoptively transferred to severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice and protect them from intraocular Ad5E1 tumour growth. Tumour-specific CD4+ T cells produced IFN-gamma in response to Ad5E1 tumour antigens. Macrophages also contributed to rejection, as they were present in intraocular Ad5E1 tumours, and local depletion of macrophages resulted in progressive tumour growth. Ocular macrophages contributed to Ad5E1 tumour rejection, as Ad5E1 tumour rejection did not occur in macrophage-depleted SCID mice reconstituted with rejector CD4+ T cells. This demonstrates that macrophage and CD4+ T-cell co-operation is needed for non-phthisical rejection of intraocular tumours.

CD8+ T cells circumvent immune privilege in the eye and mediate intraocular tumor rejection by a TNF-alpha-dependent mechanism

Although intraocular tumors reside in an immune-privileged environment, T cells can circumvent immune privilege and mediate tumor rejection without inducing damage to normal ocular tissue. In this study, we used a well-characterized tumor, Ad5E1 (adenovirus type 5 early region 1), to analyze the role of CD8+ T cells in the pristine rejection of intraocular tumors. It has been previously documented that Ad5E1 tumor rejection can occur in the absence of CD8+ T cells. However, here we find that CD8+ T cells infiltrated intraocular Ad5E1 tumors in C57BL/6 mice. Surprisingly, CD8+ T cells from tumor-rejector mice could mediate intraocular tumor rejection following adoptive transfer to SCID mice. In determining the mechanisms behind CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor rejection, we discovered that antitumor CTL activity was neither observed nor necessary for rejection of the intraocular tumors. CD8+ T cells from rejector mice did not produce IFN-gamma in response to Ad5E1 tumor Ags or use FasL to mediate intraocular tumor rejection. Also, CD8+ T cells did not use perforin or TRAIL, as CD8+ T cells from perforin knockout (KO) and TRAIL KO mice conferred protection to SCID recipient mice following adoptive transfer. We discovered that CD8+ T cells used TNF-alpha to mediate tumor rejection, because Ad5E1 tumor cells were highly sensitive to TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis and CD8+ T cells from TNF-alpha KO mice did not protect SCID mice from progressive Ad5E1 tumor growth. The results indicate that CD8+ T cells circumvent immune privilege and mediate intraocular tumor rejection by a TNF-alpha-dependent manner while leaving the eye intact and vision preserved.

Ocular immune privilege is circumvented by CD4+ T cells, leading to the rejection of intraocular tumors in an IFN-{gamma}-dependent manner

Although intraocular tumors reside in an immune-privileged site, they can circumvent immune privilege and undergo rejection, which typically follows one of two pathways. One pathway involves CD4(+) T cells, delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), and the culmination in ischemic necrosis of the tumor and phthisis (atrophy) of the eye. The second pathway is DTH-independent and does not inflict collateral injury to ocular tissues, and the eye is preserved. In this study, we used a well-characterized tumor, Ad5E1, to analyze the role of IFN-gamma in the nonphthisical form of intraocular tumor rejection. The results showed that IFN-gamma induced tumor cell apoptosis, inhibited tumor cell proliferation, and promoted rejection by inhibiting angiogenesis. Microarray analysis revealed that IFN-gamma induced up-regulation of five antiangiogenic genes and down-regulation of four proangiogenic genes in Ad5E1 tumor cells. Although IFN-gamma knockout (KO) mice have progressively growing intraocular tumors, IFN-gamma was not needed for the elimination of extraocular tumors, as all IFN-gamma KO mice rejected s.c. tumor inocula. This represents a heretofore unrecognized role for IFN-gamma in circumventing ocular immune privilege and eliminating intraocular tumors. The findings also reveal that some IFN-gamma-independent tumor rejection processes are excluded from the eye and may represent a new facet of ocular immune privilege.

Immunology of intraocular tumors

The immune surveillance hypothesis was introduced over 30 years ago and proposed that neoplasms express novel antigens that subjected them to immune detection and elimination. In order for immune surveillance to be effective in controlling neoplasms, two requirements must be satisfied: 1) the tumor must arise in a body site that permits the induction the full array of immune responses and 2) the immune elements generated must have unfettered access to the tumor and be able to express their entire range of effector functions at the tumor site. The unique immunologic and anatomic features of the eye prevent the induction and expression of conventional immunity--a phenomenon known as 'immune privilege'. Although ocular immune privilege represents a theoretical obstacle to immune surveillance, some highly immunogenic intraocular tumors can circumvent immune privilege and undergo immune rejection. Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults, yet it occurs with a frequency that is no higher than neoplasms arising in conventional bodies. The presence of either tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) or tumor-infiltrating macrophages (TIM) is associated with poor prognosis in uveal melanoma patients and suggests that some immune responses to intraocular tumors might exacerbate, rather than mitigate, tumor progression. Although counterintuitive, this proposition is consistent with the 'immune stimulation' hypothesis of tumor progression offered by Richmond Prehn over thirty years ago. It remains to be ascertained if immune stimulation affects the malignancy of ocular tumors, but it represents an intriguing explanation for the paradoxes of uveal melanoma.

Role of TRAIL and IFN-gamma in CD4+ T cell-dependent tumor rejection in the anterior chamber of the eye

Although the anterior chamber of the eye expresses immune privilege, some ocular tumors succumb to immune rejection. Previous studies demonstrated that adenovirus-induced tumors, adenovirus type 5 early region 1 (Ad5E1), underwent immune rejection following transplantation into the anterior chamber of syngeneic mice. Intraocular tumor rejection required CD4(+) T cells, but did not require the following: 1) CD8(+) T cells, 2) B cells, 3) TNF, 4) perforin, 5) Fas ligand, or 6) NK cells. This study demonstrates that CD4(+) T cell-dependent tumor rejection does not occur in IFN-gamma-deficient mice. Ad5E1 tumor cells expressed DR5 receptor for TRAIL and were susceptible to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Although IFN-gamma did not directly induce apoptosis of the tumor cells, it rendered them 3-fold more susceptible to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Both CD4(+) T cells and corneal endothelial cells expressed TRAIL and induced apoptosis of Ad5E1 tumor cells. The results suggest that Ad5E1 tumor rejection occurs via TRAIL-induced apoptosis as follows: 1) tumor cells express TRAIL-R2 and are susceptible to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, 2) IFN-gamma enhances TRAIL expression on CD4(+) T cells and ocular cells, 3) IFN-gamma enhances tumor cell susceptibility to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, 4) apoptotic tumor cells are found in the eyes of rejector mice, but not in the eyes of IFN-gamma knockout mice that fail to reject intraocular tumors, 5) CD4(+) T cells and corneal endothelial cells express TRAIL and induce apoptosis of tumor cells, and 6) apoptosis induced by either CD4(+) T cells or corneal cells can be blocked with anti-TRAIL Ab.

Immunoregulation of intraocular tumours

Intraocular tumours reside within an organ that provides sanctuary from many immunological defence mechanisms. Antigens displayed on many intraocular tumours can elicit an aberrant systemic immune response in which systemic antigen-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) is actively downregulated, thus denying the host one potential effector mechanism for controlling its intraocular tumour. Constituents within the aqueous humour inhibit the expression of DTH and natural killer cell effector mechanisms within the eye and thus protect intraocular tumours from immune-mediated rejection. Some experimental intraocular tumours in mice express potent tumour-specific antigens that stimulate the expansion of tumour-specific robust cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) populations which enter the eye and mediate tumour rejection by piecemeal tumour necrosis. However, the presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) within an intraocular tumour does not inevitably lead to tumour resolution. In some cases CTL precursors infiltrate the intraocular tumour but fail to differentiate into mature cytolytic effector cells. Although uveal melanomas express melanoma-specific and melanoma-associated antigens that are capable of eliciting both humoral and cellular immunity, formidable barriers prevent the expression of tumour immunity. These barriers include: (a) anterior chamber-associated immune deviation; (b) in situ suppression of DTH effector cells; (c) suppression of natural killer cell activity in oculi; and (d) inactivation of the complement cascade by regulatory proteins expressed on uveal melanoma cells.

Anti-leukocyte function-1 antibody treatment prevents the rejection of intraocular regressor tumors and their metastases

The role of the cell adhesion molecules, LFA-1 and ICAM-1, in intraocular tumor rejection was examined using four different syngeneic intraocular regressor tumors and four different inbred mouse strains. All four tumors undergo T cell-dependent immune rejection in the syngeneic host. Two of the tumors, D5.1G4 melanoma and P91 mastocytoma, undergo rejection by a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-like immune process. The other two tumors, UV5C25 fibrosarcoma and 124E2 melanoma, are rejected by a process that appears to be mediated by delayed-type hypersensitivity. Systemic administration of anti-LFA-1 prevented the rejection of all four categories of tumors. By contrast, similar in vivo treatment with anti-ICAM-1 antibody did not inhibit tumor rejection. The effect of anti-LFA-1 and anti-ICAM-1 antibody treatment on the rejection of metastases arising from intraocular P91 tumors was also examined and found to be highly dependent upon normal LFA-1 function since antibody treatment with anti-LFA-1 prevented the rejection of metastases. Treatment with anti-ICAM-1 antibody alone had no appreciable effect on the rejection of metastases. The results from this study indicate that the expression and function of LFA-1 is crucial for the generation of immune responses to tumor antigens originating within the eye and the expression of tumor immunity within the eye and at distant sites.

Rejection of intraocular tumors from transgenic mice by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

The present study examined the role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in the rejection of intraocular tumors from SV40 transgenic mice. Tumor cells from an intraocular tumor arising in an SV40 transgenic FVB/N mouse were transplanted into the eyes of syngeneic FVB/N mice and the TIL isolated. TIL were assessed for direct cytolytic activity in vitro. TIL were also transferred passively to immunosuppressed FVB/N mice to determine if they could mediate intraocular tumor rejection. The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in intraocular tumor rejection was evaluated by depleting the respective cell populations in FVB/N hosts prior to intraocular tumor challenge. The results showed that intraocular tumors undergoing rejection in immunocompetent syngeneic hosts became infiltrated with T cells, with the CD8+ subset predominating at the time of rejection. By contrast, athymic nude mice did not reject the intraocular tumors nor did the tumors become infiltrated with TIL. TIL displayed direct, tumor-specific cytolytic activity immediately after isolation from the tumor-containing eyes. FVB/N hosts depleted of CD4+ T cells were unable to reject their intraocular tumors. In vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells delayed, but did not prevent tumor rejection. Adoptively transferred TIL mediated swift rejection of intraocular tumors in immunoincompetent recipients. Recipients of TIL, but not recipients of normal spleen cells, acquired significant tumor-specific CTL activity that was demonstrable in vitro. The results strongly suggest, but do not prove, that TIL mediate rejection of intraocular tumors from transgenic mice by direct cytolysis. Although CD4+ T cells are necessary for tumor rejection and are capable of direct cytolysis, the predominant effector cells are CD8+ CTL.

The immunopathology of intraocular tumour rejection

The immunopathology of intraocular tumour rejection was studied using two transplantable tumours in mice. UV5C25 fibrosarcoma and P91 mastocytoma express tumour specific antigens that elicit strong systemic T cell-mediated immune responses following intracameral transplantation. Although both tumours underwent immunological rejection, the immunopathological sequelae of tumour rejection differed markedly. P91 tumour rejection was accompanied by bulk ischaemic necrosis, microvascular damage, and extensive damage to innocent bystander cells. A large body of experimental evidence indicated that this ischaemic necrotic pattern of intraocular tumour rejection was the result of a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) effector mechanism. By contrast, intraocular UV5C25 tumour rejection occurred by piecemeal necrosis and did not culminate in injury to juxtaposed normal host tissues. The results of in vitro and in vivo experiments strongly indicated a role for cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) mediated mechanisms in the piecemeal necrotic pattern of tumour rejection. Collectively, the results indicated that although tumour bearing hosts possessed both CTL and DTH effector mechanisms, only one form of T cell-mediated immunity prevailed within the intraocular milieu.