Impact of Helicobacter pylori colonization on immunoreactive epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-alpha in gastric juice. Its potential pathogenetic implications

Salivary and gastric epidermal growth factor in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: its protective potential

OBJECTIVE

Evidence is accumulating that epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a major molecule contributing to the maintenance of the integrity of the upper alimentary tract mucosa before and after injury by acid and pepsin. Patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES) typically have hypersecretion of acid and pepsin; however, the concentration and rate of secretion of salivary and gastric EGF that could counteract these potentially aggressive factors are unknown. Accordingly, this study was conducted to determine whether EGF affords mucosal protection in ZES patients.

METHODS

The concentration and output of salivary (sEGF) and gastric epidermal growth factor (gEGF) were measured in eight patients with ZES and the results compared to those in 17 patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD), serving as a control group. All patients had normal esophageal and gastric mucosa as determined by endoscopy. Total saliva was collected during 1-h parafilm- and 1-h pentagastrin/parafilm-stimulated conditions, as well as basal and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric juice. The concentration and output of EGF were determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

The concentration of EGF in saliva collected from ZES patients after parafilm chewing was significantly higher compared to that in NUD patients (4.61 +/- 0.59 vs 2.75 +/- 0.50 ng/ml, p < 0.05). The concentration of EGF in saliva collected after pentagastrin stimulation in ZES patients was also significantly higher than in NUD patients (4.37 +/- 0.73 vs 2.22 +/- 0.37 ng/ml, p < 0.05). Salivary EGF output during parafilm chewing in ZES and NUD were similar (68 +/- 6.4 vs 109 +/- 25.2 ng/h). Salivary EGF output after administration of pentagastrin in ZES and NUD was also similar (66 +/- 6.1 vs 132 +/- 45.4 ng/h). Basal EGF output in the gastric juice of patients with ZES was 3-fold higher than in patients with NUD (801 +/- 73 vs 271 +/- 32 ng/h, p < 0.01). Pentagastrin-stimulated EGF output was similar in both groups (705 +/- 92 vs 675 +/- 168 ng/h).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ZES have a significantly higher EGF concentration in saliva and EGF output in basal gastric juice. This elevated content of salivary and gastric EGF in ZES patients may play a protective role in preventing the development of reflux esophagitis and gastric ulcer under the impact of gastric acid and pepsin hypersecretion.

Induction and maintenance of immune effector cells in the gastric tissue of mice orally immunized to Helicobacter pylori requires salivary glands

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Helicobactor pylori mostly colonizes the gastric mucus that contains salivary antibodies. We studied the role of saliva in the induction and maintenance of gastric immunity conferred by oral vaccination against H. pylori.

METHODS

C57BL/6 mice underwent a sialoadenectomy before and after intragastric immunization using whole-cell sonicates of H. pylori and cholera toxin as an adjuvant. At 1 and 6 months after oral inoculation, we assessed the density of the H. pylori colonizing the stomach, specific antibodies in gastric secretion and sera, and the constituents of cellular infiltrates in the tissue.

RESULTS

A sialoadenectomy before, but not after, immunization abrogated protection by the vaccination at 1 month after inoculation. Protected mice had more neutrophils, plasma cells, and lymphocytes, but fewer eosinophils, in the gastric tissue than nonprotected mice. Protected mice had a greater increase of immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 specific to H. pylori than IgG2a in sera. At 6 months after inoculation, oral immunization was less effective in mice who had a sialoadenectomy than in control immunized mice. The antibody titers in both gastric secretion and in sera did not correlate with the density of bacteria colonizing the stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested that, in intragastric immunization against H. pylori, saliva is necessary for both the induction and maintenance of optimal immunity in the stomach. Effective immunity was associated with an increased number of neutrophils and lymphocytes in gastric tissue.

Helicobacter pylori infection and host cell responses

It is well known that Helicobacter pylori is able to colonize the gastric mucosa, causing a chronic and persistent infection with complications, such as peptic ulcer and gastric cancer. This review places emphasis on some epidemiological aspects of Helicobacter pylori infection and its mode of transmission. At the same time, invasive and non-invasive methods of diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection are illustrated. More space is devoted to the host response following invasion of the stomach. In this respect, the role played by different growth factors and polyamines in the course of Helicobacter pylori disease is discussed also in relation to the result of eradicating treatment. On the other hand, an accurate description of the host immune responses against Helicobacter pylori organism and/or their components (e.g. lipopolysaccharides) is reported. Finally, since Helicobacter pylori has been classified as a class I carcinogen, current researches are focussed on the Helicobacter pylori-induced carcinogenesis.

Role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in oesophageal mucosal integrity

Oesophageal mucosa has well established protective mechanisms, which operate within pre-epithelial, epithelial and post-epithelial compartments. Since refluxed acid and pepsin always act from the luminal side of the mucosa, protective factors like EGF, operating as a part of pre-epithelial defence, are thought to be pivotal in the maintenance of the integrity of the oesophageal mucosa. The significant contribution of salivary EGF to the quality of the oesophageal mucosal barrier has been demonstrated in an experimental setting and in a clinical scenario. Patients with low salivary EGF levels are predisposed to severe oesophageal damage if they develop gastro-oesophageal reflux and are a high-risk group for development of Barrett's oesophagus. Not only the salivary glands but also the human oesophagus has a profound ability to elaborate and release EGF. Some changes in luminal release of EGF during oesophageal mucosal exposure to intraluminal damaging factors imply its role in the oesophageal protective mechanisms. To exert biological effects within the oesophageal mucosal compartment, EGF requires binding to the ligand-binding domain of its receptor. This process results in receptor dimerisation, autophosphorylation and activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways. EGF receptors are localised on the basolateral and luminal aspect of the mucosal cells playing an important role in fast regeneration of oesophageal epithelium through the high mitotic activity of its proliferative zone. An increase in the rate of salivary EGF secretion during masticatory stimulation suggests its potential therapeutic benefit in the treatment of patients with damaged oesophageal mucosa.