Cardiovascular reflexes in patients with malignant disease

Global association of incidence between atrial fibrillation and the major gastrointestinal cancers: An analysis based on the 2019 Global burden of disease study

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are age-related diseases with shared environmental risk factors and underlying biological mechanisms. This study aimed to assess the association between AF and GI cancers on a global scale, analyzing incidence data from 204 countries. This ecological study utilized data from the Global Burden of Disease. Spearman's correlation and logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the association between AF and specific GI cancers, including esophagus cancer (EC), colon and rectum cancer (CRC), liver cancer (LC), pancreatic cancer (PC), and stomach cancer (SC). AF, CRC and PC exhibited increasing crude incidence rates from 2000 to 2019, whereas EC and SC demonstrated decreasing trends specifically in females. From 2000 to 2010, there was a noticeable fall in the incidence rate of LC, which was followed by a minor growth through 2019. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of AF was positively correlated with CRC and PC, but a negative relationship with AF was revealed for EC. Unexpectedly, no significant relationship was discovered for SC and LC associated with AF. Logistic regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between a country's ASIR of AF and its ASIR of CRC, LC and PC. Conversely, these countries demonstrated a decreased ASIR for EC. Our findings showed a significant correlation between national incidence rates of AF with CRC and PC, worldwide. Countries with higher ASIR of AF had higher ASIR of CRC and PC. Additional research is necessary to confirm the association between GI cancers and AF at the individual level.

Cardiovascular Dysautonomia in Patients with Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant disease among women, being responsible for a considerable percentage of fatalities and comorbidities every year. Despite advances in early detection and therapy, evidence shows that breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of developing other chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases.

Autonomic dysfunction is an emerging, but poorly understood topic that has been suggested as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in breast cancer patients. It clinically manifests through persistently elevated heart rates and abnormal heart rate variability, even before any signs of cardiovascular dysfunction appear. Since changes in the left ventricular ejection fraction only manifest when myocardial injury has already occurred, it has been hypothesized that autonomic dysfunction can constitute an early biomarker of cardiovascular impairment in breast cancer patients.

This review focuses on the direct and indirect effects of cancer and its treatment on the autonomic nervous system in breast cancer patients. We highlight the mechanisms potentially involved in cancer and antineoplastic therapy-related autonomic imbalance and review the potential strategies to prevent and/or attenuate autonomic dysfunction.

There are gaps in the current knowledge; more research in this area is needed to identify the relevance of autonomic dysfunction and define beneficial interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in breast cancer patients.

Arrhythmic Complications Associated with Cancer Therapies

Over the last several decades, advancements in cancer screening and treatment have significantly improved cancer mortality and overall quality of life. Unfortunately, non-cancer-related side effects, including cardiovascular toxicities can impact the continued delivery of these treatments. Arrhythmias are an increasingly recognized class of cardiotoxicity that can occur as a direct consequence of the treatment or secondary to another type of toxicity such as heart failure, myocarditis, or ischemia. Atrial arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation (AF) are most commonly encountered, however, ventricular- and bradyarrhythmias can also occur, albeit at lower rates. Treatment strategies tailored to patients with cancer are essential to allow for the safe delivery of the cancer treatment without affecting short- or long-term oncologic or cardiovascular outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A growing body of evidence suggests a strong association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer. A relevant number of patients with a present or former malignant disease with highly symptomatic drug-refractory AF are in need of interventional therapy. Data on the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in these patients are sparse. The present study aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) for symptomatic AF in patients with past or present cancer disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing CB-PVI for symptomatic AF at University Hospital Lübeck, Germany between July 2015 and January 2019 were included in this study. Propensity-score based matching was performed to identify comparable patients with and without cancer disease and further analyze clinical characteristics, periprocedural complications and arrhythmia-free survival. A total of 70 patients with a history of cancer undergoing CB-PVI were matched to 70 patients without a history of cancer. The frequency of complications was similar between patients with and without a history of cancer (p = 0.11), with four phrenic nerve palsies occurring in patients with a history of cancer (5.6% of the cohort) vs. one phrenic nerve palsy in patients without cancer (p = 0.36). Arrhythmia free survival after 12 months did not differ significantly in patients with and without a history of cancer (67.1 ± 5.8% vs. 77.8% ± 5.1%, p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that CB-PVI for symptomatic AF is equally safe and effective in patients with and without a history of cancer and cancer treatment.

Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

With the advent of novel cancer therapeutics and improved screening, more patients are surviving a cancer diagnosis or living longer with advanced disease. Many of these treatments have associated cardiovascular toxicities that can manifest in both an acute and a delayed fashion. Arrhythmias are an increasingly identified complication with unique management challenges in the cancer population. The purpose of this scientific statement is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding arrhythmia identification and treatment in patients with cancer. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are most common, but ventricular arrhythmias, including those related to treatment-induced QT prolongation, and bradyarrhythmias can also occur. Despite increased recognition, dedicated prospective studies evaluating true incidence are lacking. Moreover, few studies have addressed appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. As such, this scientific statement serves to mobilize the cardio-oncology, electrophysiology, and oncology communities to develop clinical and scientific collaborations that will improve the care of patients with cancer who have arrhythmias.

Incidence of atrial fibrillation in different major cancer subtypes: a Nationwide population-based 12 year follow up study

Background

The prevalence of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and malignancies are increasing in the elderly, but incidences of new onset AF in different cancer subtypes are not well described.The objectives of this study were therefore to determine the incidence of AF in different cancer subtypes and to examine the association of cancer and future AF.

Methods

Using national databases, the Danish general population was followed from 2000 until 2012. Every individual aged > 18 years and with no history of cancer or AF prior to study start was included. Incidence rates of new onset AF were identified and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of AF in cancer patients were calculated in an adjusted Poisson regression model.

Results

A total of 4,324,545 individuals were included in the study. Cancer was diagnosed in 316,040 patients. The median age of the cancer population was 67.0 year and 51.5% were females. Incidences of AF were increased in all subtypes of cancer. For overall cancer, the incidence was 17.4 per 1000 person years (PY) vs 3.7 per 1000 PY in the general population and the difference increased with age. The covariate adjusted IRR for AF in overall cancer was 1.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44–1.48). The strength of the association declined with time from cancer diagnosis (IRR_0-90days = 3.41 (3.29–3.54), (IRR-_{180 days-1 year} = 1.57 (CI 1.50–1.64) and (IRR_{2–5 years} = 1.12 (CI 1.09–1.15).

Conclusions

In this nationwide cohort study we observed that all major cancer subtypes were associated with an increased incidence of AF. Further, cancer and AF might be independently associated.

Association of Cancer and the Risk of Developing Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims

Previous studies have demonstrated epidemiological evidence for an association between cancer and the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these results have been conflicting. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between cancer and the risk of developing atrial fibrillation.

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for publications examining the association between cancer and atrial fibrillation risk published until June 2017. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI were extracted and pooled.

Results

A total of five studies involving 5,889,234 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Solid cancer patients are at higher risk developing atrial fibrillation compared to noncancer patients (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.66, p < 0.00001; I² = 67%, p=0.02). The risk of atrial fibrillation was highest within 90 days of cancer diagnosis (OR 7.62, 95% CI 3.08 to 18.88, p < 0.00001) and this risk diminished with time.

Conclusions

The risk of AF was highest within 90 days of cancer diagnosis. We should take into account the increased risk of atrial fibrillation development and, after this, study the embolic risk and potential indication of oral anticoagulation.

Impact of supportive therapy modalities on heart rate variability in cancer patients - a systematic review

Purpose: To systematically review literature for interventional studies and their impact on autonomic dysfunction assessed by heart rate variability in cancer patients.Methods: Research was conducted using the databases Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of science from their inception to October 2017. Original articles with an interventional design that reported changes in at least one heart rate variability parameter as outcome parameter were included and described.Results: Ten studies were identified as eligible for subsequent analysis. The main application field in oncological therapy setting was music therapy intervention, Traditional Chinese Medicine related treatments, exercise interventions, relaxation, and myofascial release techniques. Breast cancer was the most frequently described single cancer entity. Heart rate variability recording was performed with standard electrocardiography devices or wearable heart rate monitors, within a time range between 5 and 20 min and a sampling rate varying from 200 to 1000 Hz. No adverse events were reported in all studies.Conclusions: Supportive therapy modalities may have the potential to enhance vegetative functioning. In this context, heart rate variability analysis appears to be an easily applicable and safe method to evaluate cancer related autonomic dysfunction. More large prospective multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed.Implication for rehabilitationMost cancer patients face autonomic dysfunction due to the disease itself the applied treatments or combination of both.HRV measurement is an easy and safe method to asses autonomic dysfunction.Supportive treatments targeting on an elevation of the vagal tone and autonomic balance in general might have beneficial effects for cancer patients.

Autonomic dysfunction in cancer cachexia coincides with large fiber polyneuropathy

CONTEXT

Cancer cachexia occurs in most patients suffering from solid malignancies. Recent works suggest paraneoplastic mechanisms. Empirical studies also found autonomic dysfunction in cancer patients, but comprehensive evaluation of the peripheral nervous system is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To further understand the role of the autonomic and peripheral nervous system in cancer cachexia to guide treatment.

METHODS

We prospectively investigated cachectic cancer patients for parasympathetic autonomic dysfunction with a time-domain-based analysis of heart rate variability (breathing at rest, deep breath, and in response to the Valsalva maneuver). Blood pressure changes after the Valsalva maneuver were used as a marker of the sympathetic noradrenergic system. Orthostatic hypertension was investigated in response to active standing. We used a noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat heart rate assessment and blood pressure monitoring. The sympathetic cholinergic nervous system was evaluated with the sympathetic skin response. A detailed neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, and electromyography also were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients were enrolled (median age 66 years). Median time from inclusion until death was 3.5 months. About 12 of the 13 patients showed abnormal results in at least one autonomic test. Sympathetic noradrenergic and cholinergic abnormalities were discovered in six patients each and five patients had orthostatic hypotension. Only one patient showed abnormal results in parasympathetic cholinergic tests. Asymptomatic large fiber polyneuropathy was detected in eight patients.

CONCLUSION

Large fiber polyneuropathy coincides with autonomic dysfunction in cachectic cancer patients. Our findings suggest a relevant role of sympathetic impairment in cancer cachexia.

Colorectal cancer and risk of atrial fibrillation and flutter: a population-based case-control study

Colorectal cancer has recently been associated with an increased atrial fibrillation risk, but evidence is very sparse. So, we conducted a population-based case-control study in northern Denmark (population 1.7 million) during 1998-2006 to estimate the atrial fibrillation/flutter risk in colorectal cancer patients. We identified 28,333 atrial fibrillation/flutter cases and 283,260 sex-, age-, and county-matched population controls. We searched the databases for a prior colorectal cancer diagnosis, a prior cancer diagnosis other than colorectal cancer, and performance of surgery within 30 days prior to atrial fibrillation/flutter. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the OR of atrial fibrillation/flutter in patients with colorectal cancer, cancers other than colorectal and in patient with surgery. Among cases, 0.59% (n = 168) had a colorectal cancer diagnosis within 90 days before their atrial fibrillation/flutter diagnosis, compared with 0.05% (n = 155) of controls (adjusted OR = 11.8; 95% CI 9.3-14.9). Beyond the first 90 days after a colorectal cancer diagnosis, atrial fibrillation/flutter risk was no longer increased. There was likewise an increased atrial fibrillation/flutter risk in patients diagnosed with another cancer form in the prior 90 days (OR = 7.0, 95% CI 6.3-7.8). Furthermore, the atrial fibrillation/flutter risk was elevated fivefold in patients who had undergone surgery, whether or not cancer-related. We therefore conclude that colorectal cancer patients are at increased atrial fibrillation/flutter risk exclusively in the first 90 days after cancer diagnosis, but to no greater an extent than are patients with other cancers. The performance of surgery probably plays an important role in this association.

Autonomic dysfunction in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A paraneoplastic syndrome?

We wanted to determine whether autonomic dysfunction in patients with lymphoma is related to chemotherapy or represent a paraneoplastic syndrome. 40 patients with current or cured Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 40 healthy controls, matched for age, gender, hypertension and diabetes mellitus underwent autonomic evaluation (Deep Breath, Valsalva Maneuver, Hand Grip, Lying to Standing, Tilt Test). Current patients also suffering from diabetes or hypertension, or still on chemotherapy revealed autonomic changes, while cured or healthy subjects did not. Autonomic dysfunction in lymphoma is a transient manifestation of a paraneoplastic syndrome.

First diagnosis of colorectal or breast cancer and prevalence of atrial fibrillation

Aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with two different types of cancer. Recent epidemiologic and clinical studies support the hypothesis that AF is promoted and maintained by a broad spectrum of modulating factors. A total of 2,339 patients admitted to the Surgery Department of "Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan," over the period 1987-2004 were eligible for the study. One thousand three hundred and seventeen patients were admitted consecutively with a first diagnosis of colorectal or breast cancer (cases). The remaining 1,022 were patients admitted to undergo non-neoplastic surgery (controls). Routine pre-surgery electrocardiogram available in patient charts was analysed by a cardiologist who was not aware of the present study to evaluate the presence of atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias. Overall, AF was present in 3.6% cases and 1.6% controls. This corresponded to at least two times higher likelihood of having AF in cases compared to controls. Prevalence of AF increased with age both in cases and controls. Our study describes an increased prevalence of AF in two different types of cancer. Autonomic, endocrine, coagulation, and inflammatory alterations were previously described in both AF and cancer, and can provide the physiopathological basis to our clinical observation.