Discriminative stimulus effects of omega (BZ) receptor ligands: correlation with in vivo inhibition of [3H]-flumazenil binding in different regions of the rat central nervous system

Prenatal effects of alprazolam treatment on the immature cerebellum of rats

The use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) during pregnancy, especially alprazolam, is common and its impact on the fetal neural tissue is not known. In this sense, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of prenatal treatment with alprazolam on the cerebellum of Wistar rat pups. Thirty animals (24 females and six males, CEUA protocol 014/17) were separated into pairs for copulation. Females were divided into three groups: Control (CT), treatment 1 (T1, 1.25 mg per animal), and treatment 2, which is an overdose (T2, 30 mg per animal). Alprazolam was administered 10 days before copulation and throughout pregnancy. We evaluated the number and weight of pups and the macroscopic changes in the brain. Eight neonates (n = 8) from each group were used in the following analyses: Cellular and chromatin density, gliosis, synaptic density, inflammation, and oxidative stress. The results showed no significant differences regarding the number of pups, body weight, and macroscopic changes. The morphological study focused on the external granular layer (EGL) that is presented only in the immature cerebellum. Here, we detected more cells after alprazolam treatment; the T2 group showed large nuclei and some pyknotic nuclei; also, both treated groups presented an increase in the euchromatin density compared with the control. The molecular and biochemical analyses used the total protein extract of the entire cerebellum and showed an increased expression of Iba-1 and NF-κBp65 but without indication of inflammation or degeneration in the T1 group. Overdose of alprazolam presented an increased level of oxidative degradation of lipids. The treatment with alprazolam during pregnancy involved cellular and molecular changes in the immature cerebellum.

Zolpidem induced hyponatremia: a case report

Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic that acts by binding to (GABAA) receptor. This is a case report of a patient with chronic insomnia for which he had initially been receiving benzodiazepine hypnotic alprazolam and for the past three years, he had switched himself to non-benzodiazepine hypnotic, zolpidem and had progressively increased the dose to 20 mg. The patient presented with history of drowsiness, nausea and vomiting of short duration. Investigations revealed that the patient had hyponatremia. Decreased serum sodium, elevated urine sodium with normal urine osmolarity was detected. Therefore, we report this as a case of drug induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) as other likely causes were ruled out by appropriate investigations. The causality assessment was done according to the WHO scale and found to be "Probable".

The behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem: evidence for the functional significance of α1-containing GABA(A) receptors

RATIONALE

Zolpidem is a positive allosteric modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) with preferential binding affinity and efficacy for α1-subunit containing GABA(A) receptors (α1-GABA(A)Rs). Over the last three decades, a variety of animal models and experimental procedures have been used in an attempt to relate the behavioral profile of zolpidem and classic benzodiazepines (BZs) to their interaction with α1-GABA(A)Rs.

OBJECTIVES

This paper reviews the results of rodent and non-human primate studies that have evaluated the effects of zolpidem on motor behaviors, anxiety, memory, food and fluid intake, and electroencephalogram (EEG) sleep patterns. Also included are studies that examined zolpidem's discriminative, reinforcing, and anticonvulsant effects as well as behavioral signs of tolerance and withdrawal.

RESULTS

The literature reviewed indicates that α1-GABA(A)Rs play a principle role in mediating the hypothermic, ataxic-like, locomotor- and memory-impairing effects of zolpidem and BZs. Evidence also suggests that α1-GABA(A)Rs play partial roles in the hypnotic, EEG sleep, anticonvulsant effects, and anxiolytic-like of zolpidem and diazepam. These studies also indicate that α1-GABA(A)Rs play a more prominent role in mediating the discriminative stimulus, reinforcing, hyperphagic, and withdrawal effects of zolpidem and BZs in primates than in rodents.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychopharmacological data from both rodents and non-human primates suggest that zolpidem has a unique pharmacological profile when compared with classic BZs. The literature reviewed here provides an important framework for studying the role of different GABA(A)R subtypes in the behavioral effects of BZ-type drugs and helps guide the development of new pharmaceutical agents for disorders currently treated with BZ-type drugs.

Contribution of alpha1 subunit-containing gamma-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors to motor-impairing effects of benzodiazepines in squirrel monkeys

RATIONALE

Benzodiazepines (BZs) are effective anxiolytics and hypnotics, but their use is limited by unwanted side effects, such as motor impairment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the contribution of alpha1 subunit-containing gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor subtypes to the motor-impairing effects of BZs, the present study evaluated two observable measures of motor coordination (balance on a pole, resistance to hind-limb flexion) engendered by nonselective and selective BZ-site agonists in squirrel monkeys.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple doses of nonselective BZs (triazolam, alprazolam, diazepam, and chlordiazepoxide) and alpha1 subunit-preferring agonists (zolpidem and zaleplon) were administered to adult male squirrel monkeys (N = 4-6), and experimenters rated the monkey's ability to balance on a horizontal pole ("ataxic-like effects"), as well as the degree of resistance to hind-limb flexion ("myorelaxant-like effects").

RESULTS

Administration of all BZ-type drugs resulted in ataxic-like and myorelaxant-like effects. Pretreatment with the alpha1 subunit-preferring antagonist beta-carboline-3-carboxylate-t-butyl ester (betaCCT) attenuated the ataxic-like effects engendered by both types of drugs. However, betaCCT was largely ineffective at blocking the ability of both BZs and non-BZs to induce myorelaxant-like effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These experiments demonstrate dose-dependent motor impairment in squirrel monkeys using quantitative behavioral observation techniques. Altogether, these findings suggest a lack of a prominent role for alpha1 subunit-containing receptors in the alteration of hind-limb flexion, a putative measure of myorelaxation, induced by BZ-type drugs in monkeys.

Comparison of the novel subtype-selective GABAA receptor-positive allosteric modulator NS11394 [3'-[5-(1-hydroxy-1-methyl-ethyl)-benzoimidazol-1-yl]-biphenyl-2-carbonitrile] with diazepam, zolpidem, bretazenil, and gaboxadol in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain

Spinal administration of GABA(A) receptor modulators, such as the benzodiazepine drug diazepam, partially alleviates neuropathic hypersensitivity that manifests as spontaneous pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. However, benzodiazepines are hindered by sedative impairments and other side effect issues occurring mainly as a consequence of binding to GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha(1) subunit. Here, we report on the novel subtype-selective GABA(A) receptor-positive modulator NS11394 [3'-[5-(1-hydroxy-1-methyl-ethyl)-benzoimidazol-1-yl]-biphenyl-2-carbonitrile], which possesses a functional efficacy selectivity profile of alpha(5) > alpha(3) > alpha(2) > alpha(1) at GABA(A) alpha subunit-containing receptors. Oral administration of NS11394 (1-30 mg/kg) to rats attenuated spontaneous nociceptive behaviors in response to hindpaw injection of formalin and capsaicin, effects that were blocked by the benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil. Ongoing inflammatory nociception, observed as hindpaw weight-bearing deficits after Freund's adjuvant injection, was also completely reversed by NS11394. Likewise, hindpaw mechanical allodynia was fully reversed by NS11394 in two rat models of peripheral neuropathic pain. Importantly, NS11394-mediated antinociception occurred at doses 20 to 40-fold lower than those inducing minor sedative or ataxic impairments. In contrast, putative antinociception associated with administration of either diazepam, zolpidem, or gaboxadol only occurred at doses producing intolerable side effects, whereas bretazenil was completely inactive despite minor influences on motoric function. In electrophysiological studies, NS11394 selectively attenuated spinal nociceptive reflexes and C-fiber-mediated wind-up in vitro pointing to involvement of a spinal site of action. The robust therapeutic window seen with NS11394 in animals suggests that compounds with this in vitro selectivity profile could have potential benefit in clinical treatment of pain in humans.

Do subtype-selective gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor modulators have a reduced propensity to induce physical dependence in mice?

Recent evidence suggests that GABA(A) receptors containing an alpha1 subunit mediate the sedative effect of diazepam, whereas receptors with an alpha2 subunit mediate this benzodiazepine's anxiolytic effect. Thus, compounds selective for GABA(A)-alpha2 receptors may offer advantages, i.e., lack of sedation, over current benzodiazepines. Whether such compounds would offer additional advantages over benzodiazepines is unclear. Here, we address the issue of physical dependence by comparing the GABA(A)-alpha1 affinity-selective drug zolpidem, the novel compounds 7-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-(2-methyl-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-3-(2,5-difluorophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine (L-838,417) and 6-fluoro-9-methyl-2-phenyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl-carbonyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyridol[3,4-b]indol-1-one (SL651498) with functional selectivity for certain non-alpha(1) GABA(A) receptors, nonselective partial agonists [bretazenil, 1-[1-[3-(3-pyridyl)phenyl]benzimidazol-5-yl]ethanone O-ethyloxime (NS2710), and 5-furan-3-yl-1-(3-imidazol-1-phenyl)-1H-benzoimidazole (NS2664)], and nonselective full efficacy benzodiazepines, in a rapid precipitated withdrawal assay using the inverse agonist N-methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxamide (FG-7142). For all compounds, we determined in vitro IC50 values to displace [3H]flunitrazepam from rat cortex and in vivo ED50 values for displacement of [3H]flunitrazepam from mouse forebrain (including length of in vivo occupancy). In the precipitated withdrawal model, compounds were administered at a dose giving approximately 80% receptor occupancy, obviating major differences in central nervous system bioavailability. Mice were administered compounds twice daily for 4 days and on day 5, 20 h after the final dose, given a dose of FG-7142 (40 mg/kg i.p.) that did not induce seizures in control animals. In mice treated with the three subtype-selective compounds, FG-7142 did not induce seizures. Moreover, there was a low propensity for FG-7142 to induce seizures in animals treated with the partial agonists, whereas seizures were clearly seen in animals treated with most benzodiazepines. Nonetheless, differences among the benzodiazepines themselves, similarities between the partial agonists and subtype-selective compounds, the in vitro/in vivo potency, and in vivo receptor exposure time data suggest a complex interaction among selectivity, efficacy, potency, and receptor exposure in determining physical dependence liability of benzodiazepine site modulators in mice.

Comparative cue generalization profiles of L-838, 417, SL651498, zolpidem, CL218,872, ocinaplon, bretazenil, zopiclone, and various benzodiazepines in chlordiazepoxide and zolpidem drug discrimination

The zolpidem discriminative cue is mediated by GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors, whereas the chlordiazepoxide cue may be mediated via non-alpha1 GABA(A) receptors because compounds with selective affinity for GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors fully generalize to the former cue. We predicted that L-838,417 [7-tert-butyl-3-(2,5-difluorophenyl)-6-(2-methyl-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine], a partial agonist at non-alpha1 GABA(A) receptors and an antagonist at GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors, would generalize to the chlordiazepoxide but not the zolpidem-discriminative cue. SL651498 [6-fluoro-9-methyl-2-phenyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl-carbonyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyridol[3,4-b]indol-1-one] is a full agonist at GABA(A)-alpha2 receptors, with lower efficacy at GABA(A)-alpha3 receptors and least efficacy at GABA(A)-alpha1 and GABA(A)-alpha5 receptors. Because SL651498 has efficacy at GABA(A)-alpha1 receptors, we anticipated that it would generalize to both discriminative cues. Rats were trained to discriminate either zolpidem (3 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) from vehicle using a two-lever operant procedure. The generalization profiles of L-838,417 and SL651498 were compared with nonselective full agonists, GABA(A)-alpha1-selective ligands zolpidem and CL218,872 [3-methyl-6-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine], the nonselective partial agonist bretazenil, and the novel anxioselective drug ocinaplon. A nonselective partial agonist was included because L-838,417 and SL651498 are partial agonists at some GABA(A) receptors, and this property may influence their generalization profiles. All nonselective full agonists and ocinaplon fully generalized to both cues. CL218,872 and zolpidem generalized to zolpidem only, whereas L-838,417 fully generalized to chlordiazepoxide only. SL651498 fully generalized to chlordiazepoxide and occasioned significant zolpidem-appropriate responding. Bretazenil was similar to SL651498. In conclusion, at this training dose, the chlordiazepoxide-discriminative stimulus is mediated primarily via non-alpha1 GABA(A) receptors and the generalization profiles of the ligands tested seem to correspond with their in vitro profiles at GABA(A) receptor subtypes.

Prenatal protein malnutrition enhances stimulus control by CDP, but not a CDP/THIP combination in rats

In the present study, the effects of prenatal protein malnutrition on stimulus control exerted by the benzodiazepine (BZ), chlordiazepoxide (CDP) and the GABA-A receptor agonist 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP) were characterized. The adult, male offspring of female Sprague-Dawley rats fed either low (6% casein) or adequate (25% casein) protein diets 5 weeks prior to mating and throughout pregnancy served as subjects. Subjects were first trained to discriminate CDP (8.0 mg/kg ip) from saline using drug discrimination procedures. Once a criterion level of performance was achieved, generalization tests were performed to lower doses of CDP (4.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 mg/kg) and then to several doses of THIP (10.0, 7.5, 5.6 and 3.2 mg/kg). Lastly, the ability of a single dose of THIP (3.0 mg/kg) to enhance discriminative control by several low doses of CDP (4.0, 2.0, 1.0 and 0.5 mg/kg) was assessed. Although both diet groups acquired the original CDP/saline discrimination at the same rate, malnourished rats exhibited significantly more generalization to low doses of CDP than their well-nourished counterparts. Neither diet group exhibited significant generalization to THIP nor a difference in THIP's ability to enhance the CDP cue. These results suggest that a subject's sensitivity to the stimulus properties of drugs can be selectively modified by prenatal malnutrition.

PET imaging of ischemic neuronal death in the hippocampus of living monkeys

The aim of the present study was to visualize postischemic hippocampal neuronal death in the living monkey brain, using a high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET) and novel radioligands. In preceding papers, we reported on postischemic hippocampal neuronal death in a model of Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) undergoing a 20-min complete whole-brain ischemia. Using the same model here, we investigated the in vivo bindings of two radiotracers, [11C]Ro15-4513 (a type II benzodiazepine receptor ligand) and [11C](+)3-MPB (a muscarinic cholinergic receptor ligand), in the hippocampus on day 7 after ischemia, as compared to the normal hippocampus. A significant decrease in the in vivo binding of [11C]Ro154513 and [11C(+)3-MPB was observed in the postischemic monkey hippocampus on day 7 after ischemia compared to controls. Light and electron microscopic analyses of postischemic CA1 neurons showed typical features of coagulation necrosis, as associated with a marked reduction of postsynaptic densities and presynaptic vesicles. These results suggest that semiquantification of hippocampal neuronal death is possible in the living primate brain using PET, and that the same procedures can be applied for evaluating neuronal cell loss in patients with ischemic injuries and/or dementia.

Zaleplon and triazolam: drug discrimination, plasma levels, and self-administration in baboons

Zaleplon is a chemically novel hypnotic that preferentially binds alpha(1)-subunit containing subtypes of the alphabetagamma configuration of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptor. Zaleplon and the non-subtype-selective hypnotic triazolam occasioned 100% drug-appropriate responding in baboons trained to discriminate lorazepam or pentobarbital from vehicle. Flumazenil shifted the zaleplon generalization gradient at least five-fold to the right. A plasma elimination half-life of 6-8 h for oral 10 mg/kg zaleplon and 0.32 mg/kg triazolam was paralleled by discriminative control for 7 h. Zaleplon maintained self-injection greater than vehicle, as did comparison doses of the similarly selective hypnotic zolpidem and triazolam. Concurrent food-maintained responding increased during self-injection of all three drugs. Preferential binding at this alpha(1)-containing GABA(A) subtype did not diminish the benzodiazepine (Bzs)-like behavioral effects of zaleplon.

Effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands and ethanol in rats trained to discriminate pregnanolone

Although GABA(A) receptor positive modulators share many behavioral effects, subtle differences have been detected among their discriminative stimulus effects. The purpose of the present study was to determine the extent of shared discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone with various benzodiazepine receptor ligands and with ethanol. Naive male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate the endogenous neuroactive steroid pregnanolone (5.6 or 8.0 mg/kg) from vehicle. The benzodiazepine receptor agonists, triazolam and lorazepam, the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist, bretazenil, the benzodiazepine1 (BZ1) receptor subtype selective agonists, zolpidem and zaleplon and ethanol were tested. Triazolam, lorazepam and bretazenil substituted for pregnanolone. Lorazepam, but not triazolam or bretazenil, decreased response rates at the highest dose tested. Zaleplon completely substituted for pregnanolone with no effect on response rates. Zolpidem substituted for pregnanolone only at a dose that severely disrupted response rates. Ethanol partially substituted for pregnanolone and decreased response rates. The results are consistent with GABA(A) receptor mediation of the discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone. The effects on response rates suggest subtle differentiation among the GABA(A) receptor-mediated cues.

Differentiating benzodiazepine- and barbiturate-like discriminative stimulus effects of lorazepam, diazepam, pentobarbital, imidazenil and zaleplon in two- versus three-lever procedures

Previous studies found that animals trained to discriminate pentobarbital show a relatively inclusive generalization profile. They generalize to sedative-hypnotics and anxiolytics, regardless of differences among such drugs in molecular mechanism of action. In contrast, animals trained to discriminate lorazepam have shown a generalization profile that appears selective for compounds with in-vitro profiles as full agonists at the benzodiazepine modulatory site. The present study investigated whether benzodiazepine receptor ligands, to which pentobarbital-trained rats had generalized under a two-lever procedure, would occasion pentobarbital- or lorazepam-appropriate responding when the rats were retrained to discriminate among pentobarbital, lorazepam and the no-drug condition under a three-lever procedure. A second group of rats was trained first to discriminate lorazepam and then retrained under the same three-lever procedure. Under the two-lever procedure, all pentobarbital-trained rats showed dose-dependent generalization to lorazepam, but not all lorazepam-trained rats showed full generalization to pentobarbital. Both groups showed full generalization to diazepam and zaleplon, a novel hypnotic that is selective for alpha, 1-subunit-containing subtypes of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor. Pentobarbital-trained rats, but not all lorazepam-trained rats, generalized to imidazenil. Under the three-lever procedure, dose-dependent generalization to lorazepam and pentobarbital was demonstrated on the appropriate levers. Diazepam shared discriminative effects with pentobarbital, zaleplon shared discriminative effects with lorazepam, and imidazenil shared discriminative effects with lorazepam and pentobarbital. These results show that when the opportunity for finer differentiation of discriminative effects of GABAergic drugs is provided, a generalization profile more in line with differential in-vitro profiles can be revealed.

Discriminative stimulus effects of drugs acting at GABA(A) receptors: differential profiles and receptor selectivity

The GABA(A) receptor complex contains a number of binding sites at which a variety of psychotropic drugs, including benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and some neurosteroids, act to potentiate or inhibit the effect of the transmitter. Many studies have reported that these drugs can produce discriminative stimulus actions, but the cueing effects of compounds acting at different sites to enhance the effects of GABA are not identical. The discriminative stimulus effects of benzodiazepines have been analyzed in detail, and there is also a great deal of information available on the effects of nonbenzodiazepine compounds acting at BZ(omega) recognition sites, which form part of the GABA(A) receptor complex. Of particular interest are compounds with selectivity for the BZ1(omega1) receptor subtype including zolpidem, zaleplon, and CI 218,872. BZ1(omega1)-selective drugs substitute for the discriminative stimulus produced by chlordiazepoxide only partially and at sedative doses. This is consistent with the view that sedative effects of BZ(omega) receptor agonists are mediated by the BZ1(omega1) receptor subtype, whereas the discriminative stimulus produced by chlordiazepoxide may be produced by activity at the BZ2(omega2) subtype. Analysis of this hypothesis is complicated by the variety of levels of intrinsic activity shown by different drugs.

Imaging of the super high affinity binding sites for [3H]Ro15-4513 in rat hippocampus: comparison between in vitro and in vivo binding

The super high affinity binding sites for [3H]Ro15-4513, a partial inverse agonist of central benzodiazepine receptors, were analyzed in rat hippocampus both in vivo and in vitro. An ultra high sensitive method of autoradiography with an imaging plate system was employed for quantitative analysis of [3H]Ro15-4513 binding. In in vitro binding, the super high affinity binding sites in the hippocampus were observed when the [3H]Ro15-4513 concentration was below 0.5 nM. In vivo, the super high affinity binding sites were only found when the injected dose of Ro15-4513 was below 3.6 microg/kg and almost disappeared when the dose was increased to 10 microg/kg. These results both in vivo and in vitro indicate that there is a significant discrepancy between actual free ligand concentration in vivo and in vitro, and that concentrations in intact brain may be much lower than previously thought.

Effects of alcohol, zolpidem, and some other sedatives and hypnotics on human performance and memory

Zolpidem (Zol), an omega1-agonist, acts via GABA(A) receptors but may differ qualitatively from diazepam (Dz) and other benzodiazepines (BZDs). We conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, and crossover study to compare the psychomotor and cognitive effects of 15 mg Zol with those of 15 mg Dz, 30 mg oxazepam (Ox), 7.5 mg zopiclone (Zop), and ethanol (EOH; 0.65 + 0.35 g x kg(-1)) given to 12 subjects at 1-week intervals. Psychomotor tests (symbol digit substitution, simulated driving, flicker fusion, body sway) were done before and 1, 3.5, and 5 h after intake; immediate and delayed memory were measured between 1.5 and 3.5 h. The plasma concentrations of drugs were measured by gas chromatography and by radioreceptor assay (RRA). The mean values of EOH in blood at 1.5, 4, and 5.5 h were 0.82, 0.88, and 0.6 g x l(-1), and the mean values of RRA-assayed plasma Dz were 470, 330, and 210 microg x l(-1), respectively. The corresponding values of other hypnosedatives, in Dz equivalents (microg x l(-1)), were 550, 750, and 330 for Ox; 350, 270, and 70 for Zol; and 160, 210, and 70 for Zop. The standard RRA graph for Zol was significantly flatter than those for other hypnotics. Zol impaired coordinative, reactive, and cognitive skills at 1 and 3.5 h more clearly than the other agents did, the most sensitive performance (tracking) still being impaired by Zol at 5 h. Dz and Zop were less active than Zol objectively; subjective sedation after Dz and Zol was stronger than after Zop. Compared to placebo, all active agents tended to impair learning and memory, their decremental effects, in declining order, being Zol, Dz > EOH, Ox > Zop. During the delay, Dz and Zol caused similar losses of material that had been learned. When separating "true" delayed memory from immediate memory (attention important), Dz and Zol had equieffects on delayed memory and were more detrimental than Zop. When contrasting that against the impaired psychomotor performances, it is possible that 15 mg Zol impairs memory relatively less than 15 mg Dz does.

Discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in the rat: differential effects of selective and nonselective benzodiazepine receptor agonists

Rats were trained to discriminate between ethanol (1.0 g/kg; 10% v/v) and saline under a fixed ratio 10 schedule of sweetened milk reinforcement. Both diazepam [nonselective, full benzodiazepine (BZ) receptors agonist] and bretazenil (nonselective, partial BZ receptor agonist) produced dose-dependent ethanol-appropriate responding (>75%). Neither diazepam nor bretazenil affected the response rate at the doses producing maximal generalisation from ethanol. In contrast, zolpidem (full BZ1 receptor agonist) and abecarnil (full BZ1/full or partial BZ2 receptor agonist) produced only moderate (<50%) ethanol-appropriate responding when tested up to doses that markedly decreased the overall response rate. These results suggest that: 1) there are no major differences between full and partial, nonselective BZ receptor agonists in their ability to substitute for 1.0 g/kg dose of ethanol; 2) stimulation of BZ1 receptors alone is not sufficient to produce ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects in the rat.

Methodological aspects for in vitro characterization of receptor binding using 11C-labeled receptor ligands: a detailed study with the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist [11C]Ro 15-1788

As a complement to in vivo studies with positron emission tomography (PET), it is desirable to perform in vitro characterization of newly developed 11C tracers. In this report we describe the technique for determination of receptor-ligand kinetics utilizing ligands labeled with the short-lived radionuclide 11C. The limitations and advantages are discussed. The benzodiazepine antagonist [11C]Ro 15-1788 was used as a model substance, and the use of storage phosphor plates for quantification of radioactivity was validated. Storage phosphor plates showed an excellent linear range (approximately 10[3]) and acceptable resolution (approximately 0.5 mm). Receptor-ligand kinetics, including depletion, association and dissociation, saturation and displacement were evaluated with good results through the use of short-lived radiotracers and storage phosphor plates.

Discriminative stimulus effects of flumazenil in rhesus monkeys treated chronically with chlordiazepoxide

Discriminative stimulus effects of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil were studied in two rhesus monkeys receiving 3.2 mg/kg/12 h of chlordiazepoxide while discriminating between vehicle and 0.056 mg/kg of flumazenil. In a drug discrimination component responding was maintained under a FR 10 schedule of stimulus-shock termination; in a non-discrimination component responding was maintained under a FR 10 schedule of food presentation. Flumazenil and Ro 15-4513 occasioned >80% flumazenil-lever responding at doses larger than 0.032 and 0.056 mg/kg, respectively. Pentylenetetrazole, ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (betaCCE), ketamine and spiradoline failed to substitute for flumazenil although >80% drug-lever responding was observed for two of the compounds in one monkey. Flumazenil, Ro 15-4513, pentylenetetrazole, betaCCE but not ketamine or spiradoline decreased rates of responding in the food component at doses that had little effect on rates in the stimulus-shock termination component. When chlordiazepoxide injections were discontinued and saline was administered before the session, monkeys did not respond on the flumazenil lever; when flumazenil was administered under the same conditions, monkeys responded on the flumazenil lever despite not having received chlordiazepoxide for nine days. Drug stimulus control was established with flumazenil in monkeys receiving chlordiazepoxide and substitution studies suggest that this effect of flumazenil might result from antagonist actions at benzodiazepine receptors: however, lack of withdrawal-related effects after termination of chlordiazepoxide treatment precludes validation of this procedure for studying benzodiazepine dependence.

Comparison of the pharmacological profiles of the hypnotic drugs, zaleplon and zolpidem

The BZ1 (omega 1)-selective compound, zolpidem, is a clinically effective hypnotic drug with a pharmacological profile which differs from those of benzodiazepine anxiolytics and hypnotics. Zaleplon (CL 284,846) has recently been described as a hypnotic agent which also has BZ1 (omega 1) receptor selectivity. The pharmacological effects of zolpidem and zaleplon were therefore compared in mice and rats. Both drugs blocked tonic convulsions induced in mice by pentylenetetrazole and electroconvulsive shock and clonic convulsions induced by isoniazid. Zaleplon was more potent than zolpidem but the maximal effect of zolpidem for increasing the latency to isoniazid-induced convulsions was greater than that of zaleplon. Little tolerance developed to the anticonvulsant effect of zaleplon against isoniazid-induced seizures following twice daily administration of 10 or 30 mg/kg for 10 days. Both compounds reduced locomotor activity and produced motor deficits in the rotarod and loaded grid tests in mice. However, while zaleplon produced all three effects at similar doses, zolpidem showed the greatest potency for reducing locomotion. Zaleplon and zolpidem also decreased locomotion and produced a rotarod deficit in rats. Again, the difference between the doses giving rise to these two effects was greater for zolpidem than for zaleplon. In a drug discrimination procedure using rats trained to discriminate a dose (5 mg/kg) of chlordiazepoxide, zaleplon produced partial substitution for chlordiazepoxide at doses which greatly reduced response rates. These results show that zaleplon and zolpidem have similar pharmacological profiles, presumably related to their BZ1 (omega 1) receptor selectivity. However, the difference between doses producing motor deficits (rotarod, loaded grid) and those giving rise to other effects (anticonvulsant, decreased locomotion) was greater for zolpidem than for zaleplon. This difference may be related to a greater in vivo intrinsic activity of zolpidem as indicated by the different efficacies of the two drugs to antagonise isoniazid-induced convulsions.

Recent developments in the behavioral pharmacology of benzodiazepine (omega) receptors: evidence for the functional significance of receptor subtypes

Recent research in molecular biology has demonstrated the complexity of GABAA receptors and shown that benzodiazepine (BZ-omega) receptor subtypes have a structural reality. It is therefore appropriate to ask whether the different pharmacological effects produced by benzodiazepines (anticonvulsant activity, anxiety reduction, motor incoordination, learning deficits, characteristic discriminative stimulus effects, tolerance and dependence) are associated with activity at different receptor subtypes. The present paper reviews the literature dealing with the behavioral effects of novel BZ (omega) receptor ligands relevant to the question of the functional significance of the BZ1 (omega 1) and BZ2 (omega 2) receptor subtypes. The only drugs currently available with a considerable degree of selectivity are alpidem and zolpidem. These compounds have relatively high affinity for GABAA receptors containing the alpha 1 subunit (corresponding to the BZ1 (omega 1) subtype) and very low affinity for receptors with the alpha 5 subunit (corresponding to one type of BZ2 (omega 2) receptor). Pharmacological effects observed with these, and other, less selective compounds allow several tentative conclusions to be drawn: (a) Little is known of the role of subtype selectivity in anxiolytic or amnestic effects but compounds with low intrinsic activity may reduce anxiety without giving rise to sedation or motor incoordination and BZ1 (omega 1) selective drugs appear to disrupt memory only at sedative doses; (b) Selectivity for BZ1 (omega 1) receptors may be associated with sleep-inducing activity but not with motor incoordination, suggesting that BZ2 (omega 2) receptors may be of particular importance in mechanisms of muscle relaxation; (c) The discriminative stimulus effects of different BZ (omega) receptor ligands are not identical and differences may be related to receptor selectivity; (d) Compounds with BZ1 (omega 1) selectivity and compounds with low intrinsic activity produce little or no tolerance and dependence. A wider range of selective compounds will be necessary to investigate these factors in detail and many different pharmacological profiles can be expected from drugs with selectivity and different levels of intrinsic activity.

Evaluation of the discriminative stimulus effects of the novel sedative-hypnotic CL 284,846

CL 284,846, N-[3-(3-cyanopyrazolo[1, 5-a]pyrimidin-7-yl)phenyl)]-N- ethylacetamide, is a novel non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic with benzodiazepine-like sedative effects, but with less apparent liability for accompanying undesired side effects. In an effort to further characterize its pharmacological activity, CL 284,846 (3.0 mg/kg, IP, 30 min pretreatment) was established as a discriminative stimulus (DS) in rats (n = 7). CL 284,846 (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) showed a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding up to the training dose and a dose-related decrease in response rate. The benzodiazepine agonist triazolam (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine partial agonist Ro 17-1812 (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) and the triazolopyridazine CL 218,872 (1.0-3.0 mg/kg) substituted for CL 284,846 in all rats, whereas the imidazopyridines zolpidem (3.0-10.0 mg/kg) and alpidem (10.0-30.0 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine partial agonist bretazenil (0.03-10.0 mg/kg) and the novel putative anxiolytic CL 273,547 (10.0-56.0 mg/kg) substituted in most, but not all, rats. Ro 17-1812, bretazenil, and CL 218,872 had no effect on response rate while the other drugs showed a concomitant decrease in rate. The 5-HT1A agonist buspirone (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) and the barbiturate pentobarbital (3.0-17.0 mg/kg) failed to substitute for CL 284,846 up to rate-decreasing doses. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (3.0-10.0 mg/kg) blocked the DS effects of CL 284,846 in most rats with no effect on response rate. Taken together, these results suggest that the DS effects of CL 284,846 are mediated via benzodiazepine receptors; however, the DS profile of CL 284,846 remains distinct from both benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic drugs.

Discriminative stimulus effects of alpidem, a new imidazopyridine anxiolytic

Alpidem in an imidazopyridine derivative which binds selectively to the omega 1 (BZ1) receptor subtype. It is active in some, but not all, behavioural tests sensitive to benzodiazepine anxiolytics and has clinical anti-anxiety effects. However, in a previous study, it was shown that alpidem did not substitute for chlordiazepoxide in rats trained to discriminate this benzodiazepine. The present experiments were carried out to investigate the discriminative stimulus properties of alpidem in greater detail. In the first experiment rats learned to discriminate a dose of 10 mg/kg alpidem from saline. Acquisition of the discrimination was long and performance unstable. Chlordiazepoxide, clorazepate and zolpidem substituted only partially for alpidem but the effects of the training dose of alpidem were blocked by 10 mg/kg flumazenil. The second experiment established stimulus control more rapidly to a dose of 30 mg/kg alpidem. Alpidem induced dose-related stimulus control, and dose-related and complete substitution for alpidem was produced by zolpidem, abecarnil, CL 218,872, triazolam and suriclone. Partial substitution occurred with chlordiazepoxide, clorazepate and pentobarbital. In most cases, high levels of substitution were produced only by doses which greatly reduced response rates even though the training dose of alpidem produced only modest decreases in rates. Ethanol, buspirone and bretazenil produced very little substitution for alpidem and both flumazenil and bretazenil antagonised the effects of alpidem. In two further experiments alpidem was found to substitute for the stimulus produced by zolpidem (2 mg/kg) but not for that produced by ethanol (1.5 g/kg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)