Dopamine depletion augments endogenous opioid-induced locomotion in the nucleus accumbens using both mu 1 and delta opioid receptors

Intra-VTA deltorphin, but not DPDPE, induces place preference in ethanol-drinking rats: distinct DOR-1 and DOR-2 mechanisms control ethanol consumption and reward

BACKGROUND

While there is a growing body of evidence that the delta opioid receptor (DOR) modulates ethanol (EtOH) consumption, development of DOR-based medications is limited in part because there are 2 pharmacologically distinct DOR subtypes (DOR-1 and DOR-2) that can have opposing actions on behavior.

METHODS

We studied the behavioral influence of the DOR-1-selective agonist [D-Pen(2) ,D-Pen(5) ]-Enkephalin (DPDPE) and the DOR-2-selective agonist deltorphin microinjected into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) on EtOH consumption and conditioned place preference (CPP) and the physiological effects of these 2 DOR agonists on GABAergic synaptic transmission in VTA-containing brain slices from Lewis rats.

RESULTS

Neither deltorphin nor DPDPE induced a significant place preference in EtOH-naïve Lewis rats. However, deltorphin (but not DPDPE) induced a significant CPP in EtOH-drinking rats. In contrast to the previous finding that intra-VTA DOR-1 activity inhibits EtOH consumption and that this inhibition correlates with a DPDPE-induced inhibition of GABA release, here we found no effect of DOR-2 activity on EtOH consumption nor was there a correlation between level of drinking and deltorphin-induced change in GABAergic synaptic transmission.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the therapeutic potential of DOR agonists for alcohol abuse is through a selective action at the DOR-1 form of the receptor.

Pharmacological traits of delta opioid receptors: pitfalls or opportunities?

RATIONALE

Delta opioid receptors (DORs) have been considered as a potential target to relieve pain as well as treat depression and anxiety disorders and are known to modulate other physiological responses, including ethanol and food consumption. A small number of DOR-selective drugs are in clinical trials, but no DOR-selective drugs have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration and some candidates have failed in phase II clinical trials, highlighting current difficulties producing effective delta opioid-based therapies. Recent studies have provided new insights into the pharmacology of the DOR, which is often complex and at times paradoxical.

OBJECTIVE

This review will discuss the existing literature focusing on four aspects: (1) Two DOR subtypes have been postulated based on differences in pharmacological effects of existing DOR-selective ligands. (2) DORs are expressed ubiquitously throughout the body and central nervous system and are, thus, positioned to play a role in a multitude of diseases. (3) DOR expression is often dynamic, with many reports of increased expression during exposure to chronic stimuli, such as stress, inflammation, neuropathy, morphine, or changes in endogenous opioid tone. (4) A large structural variety in DOR ligands implies potential different mechanisms of activating the receptor.

CONCLUSION

The reviewed features of DOR pharmacology illustrate the potential benefit of designing tailored or biased DOR ligands.

Estradiol: a key biological substrate mediating the response to cocaine in female rats

A consistent finding in drug abuse research is that males and females show differences in their response to drugs of abuse. In women, increased plasma estradiol is associated with increased vulnerability to the psychostimulant and reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse. Our laboratory has focused on the role of estradiol in modulating the response to cocaine. We have seen that ovariectomy increases the locomotor response to a single cocaine injection, whereas estradiol exacerbates the locomotor response to repeated cocaine administration. Cocaine-induced sensitization of brain activity, as measured by fMRI, is also dependent on plasma estradiol. Moreover, we observed that although all ovariectomized rats show conditioned place preference to cocaine, it is more robust in ovariectomized rats with estradiol. Opioid receptors are enriched in brain regions associated with pleasure and reward. We find that in females, the effectiveness of kappa opioid agonists in decreasing the locomotor response to repeated cocaine varies with plasma estradiol. We also find that estradiol regulates the density of mu opioid receptors in brains areas associated with reward. These data hint that in females, estradiol modulates the behavioral effects of cocaine by regulating mu and kappa opioid signaling in mesocorticolimbic brain structures. Identifying the mechanisms that mediate differences in vulnerability to drugs of abuse may lead to effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment and prevention of addiction and relapse. We encourage health practitioners treating persons addicted to drugs to consider gender differences in response to particular pharmacotherapies, as well the sex steroid milieu of the patient.

Beta-endorphin and drug-induced reward and reinforcement

Although drugs of abuse have different acute mechanisms of action, their brain pathways of reward exhibit common functional effects upon both acute and chronic administration. Long known for its analgesic effect, the opioid beta-endorphin is now shown to induce euphoria, and to have rewarding and reinforcing properties. In this review, we will summarize the present neurobiological and behavioral evidences that support involvement of beta-endorphin in drug-induced reward and reinforcement. Currently, evidence supports a prominent role for beta-endorphin in the reward pathways of cocaine and alcohol. The existing information indicating the importance of beta-endorphin neurotransmission in mediating the reward pathways of nicotine and THC, is thus far circumstantial. The studies described herein employed diverse techniques, such as biochemical measurements of beta-endorphin in various brain sites and plasma, and behavioral measurements, conducted following elimination (via administration of anti-beta-endorphin antibodies or using mutant mice) or augmentation (by intracerebral administration) of beta-endorphin. We suggest that the reward pathways for different addictive drugs converge to a common pathway in which beta-endorphin is a modulating element. Beta-endorphin is involved also with distress. However, reviewing the data collected so far implies a discrete role, beyond that of a stress response, for beta-endorphin in mediating the substance of abuse reward pathway. This may occur via interacting with the mesolimbic dopaminergic system and also by its interesting effects on learning and memory. The functional meaning of beta-endorphin in the process of drug-seeking behavior is discussed.

The anatomy of co-morbid neuropsychiatric disorders based on cortico-limbic synaptic interactions

Many brain disorders appear to involve dysfunctions of aminergic systems. Alterations in dopamine activity may underpin both schizophrenia and the establishment and maintenance of drug dependence while disruption of serotonergic signalling may be crucial in both depression and schizophrenia. The co-existence of nicotine and alcohol abuse with depression and schizophrenia is well-documented as is the particular vulnerability of adolescents. At the same time, a common group of brain structures is increasingly implicated in neuropathological studies. For example, depression may involve a lack of serotonin signalling, particularly in the prefrontal cortex, while in schizophrenia there is evidence for reduced dopamine signalling in the same brain region, co-existing with hyperactivity in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway. Increased dopamine release from the mesolimbic dopamine pathway is also a common factor of drugs of abuse. Furthermore, the control of motivational behaviour and dopamine release is apparently modified by hippocampal and amygdala activity, both brain regions showing pathological changes in schizophrenia and depression. Our work has focused on the intricate synaptic interactions of aminergic terminals and cortical and subcortical neurons in order to unravel the anatomical basis for these disorders and their treatments. We show convergence of dopamine and cortical inputs onto single neurons in the nucleus accumbens, and between different cortical inputs to individual neurons, providing a basis for the gating mechanisms attributed to these interactions. We have also examined local and extrinsic connections in the prefrontal cortex and the basis for regulation of both cortical neurons and midbrain dopamine neurons by serotonin from the raph é nucleus. Together with data concerning subcellular receptor distributions, this information provides a detailed synaptic framework for interpreting behavioural, pharmacological and physiological data and enhances our understanding of possible circuitry underlying comorbidity of disorders such as schizophrenia and depression with drug abuse, information invaluable in the introduction of enhanced therapies.

Facilitation of enkephalins-induced delta-opioid behavioral responses by chronic amisulpride treatment

The endogenous opioid system is known to have a great influence on the dopaminergic system. Conversely, blockade of the dopaminergic system in D2 receptor knock-out mice triggers an increase in enkephalin supporting the important physiological relationship between both systems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether or not chronic treatment with the specific D2 antagonist amisulpride (20mg/kg, i.p., twice daily for 5 days) could lead to a facilitation of behavioral effects of enkephalins, protected from their enzymatic degradation by the dual inhibitor N-[(R,S)-2-benzyl-3[(S)(2-amino-4-methylthio)butyl dithio]-1-oxopropyl]-l-phenylalanine benzyl ester (RB101) (5mg/kg, i.v.) in mice. RB101 induced an increase in locomotor activity, antidepressant-like effects in the forced swim test, and antinociceptive effects in the hot-plate test. Chronic treatment with amisulpride potentiated the action of RB101 and this effect seemed to be restricted to behavioral responses induced by opioids acting on delta-opioid receptors (locomotor activity and forced swim test). This was confirmed by the use of the selective delta-opioid receptor agonist, (+)-4-[alpha-R*)-alpha-((2S*,5R*)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC80; 2.5mg/kg, i.p.), and antagonist, naltrindole (5mg/kg, i.p.). Considering the involvement of delta-opioid receptors in mood regulation, the interaction between amisulpride and RB101 could lead to a new therapeutic approach in the treatment of some mood disorders.

Intracerebroventricular d-Pen2, d-Pen5-enkephalin administration soon after stressor imposition influences behavioral responsivity to a subsequent stressor encounter in CD-1 mice

Endogenous opioid peptide systems diminish stress-induced autonomic nervous system, neuroendocrine (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) and behavioral responses, attenuating a collection of physiological symptoms basic to emotional and affective states. Neurogenic stressors may incite specific central changes in opioid peptide availability as well as changes in mu and delta-opioid receptor function. The present investigation evaluated the proactive influence of an intracerebroventricular injection of the opioid receptor agonist D-Pen2, D-Pen5-enkephalin (DPDPE) (0 microg, 0.005 microg, 1.0 microg or 2.5 microg) on locomotor behavior of mice following uncontrollable footshock (Shock) or novel shock chamber exposure (No Shock). It was expected that DPDPE administration following Shock on Day 1 would restore locomotor activity up to 1 week and prevent shock-associated behavior of mice encountering a brief session of footshock 18 days later. Exposure to Shock reduced horizontal locomotor and vertical locomotor (rearing) activity of mice while 2.5 microg DPDPE restored behavior. Eighteen days following Shock and DPDPE challenge, mice were exposed to either an abbreviated session of footshock (Mild Stress) or the shock chamber (Cues). Mice in the No Shock and Shock groups administered 2.5 microg DPDPE on Day 1 did not exhibit any locomotor deficits in response to Mild Stress on Day 18. Mice in the Shock group administered 0.005 microg DPDPE on Day 1, did not exhibit exaggerated rearing deficits following ensuing Mild Stressor encounter relative to mice reexposed to Cues on Day 18. Taken together, these data show that (a) footshock differentially affects rearing and locomotor activity, (b) DPDPE administration increases locomotor activity for up to 1 week following footshock and DPDPE administration, (c) reexposure to Mild Stress affects rearing and locomotor performance differently depending on previous stressor history and DPDPE dose, (d) DPDPE affords long-lasting protection to previously non-stressed mice against the deleterious effects of subsequent mild stress on locomotor activity, while a low dose of DPDE is sufficient to prevent shock-induced sensitization of rearing deficits, 18 days following original stressor and drug presentation. Finally, our investigation demonstrates that DPDPE administration alters the behavioral impact of future stressful encounters and emphasizes the importance of investigating opioid mechanisms in chronic stress disorders.

Role of mu- and delta-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in turning behaviour of rats

The role of mu-, delta1- and delta2-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in pivoting was investigated in freely moving rats. Unilateral injections of the mu-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO, 1 and 2 microg) and the delta2-opioid receptor agonist, deltorphin II (1 and 2 microg), but not the delta1-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (DPDPE, 1-4 microg), into the shell or the core of the nucleus accumbens significantly induced contraversive pivoting. The pivoting induced by DAMGO (2 microg) and deltorphin II (2 microg) was inhibited significantly by the mu-opioid receptor antagonist, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Phe-Thr-NH2 (CTOP, 0.1 and 1 microg), and the delta2-opioid receptor antagonist, naltriben (NTB, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), respectively. The DAMGO (2 microg)- or deltorphin II (2 microg)-induced pivoting was also inhibited significantly by co-administration of the dopamine D1/D2 receptor antagonist, cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 microg). The pivoting induced by unilateral injections of a mixture of dopamine D1 (SKF 38393, 5 microg) and D2 (quinpirole, 10 microg) receptor agonists into the shell was significantly inhibited by cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 microg) or NTB (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.), but not CTOP (1 microg) or delta1-opioid receptor antagonist, (E)-7-benzylidenenaltrexone (1 mg/kg, i.p.). The contraversive pivoting elicited by the cholinergic agonist, carbachol (5 microg), into the core was inhibited by co-administration of the muscarinic M1 antagonist, pirenzepine (1 microg), but not cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 microg). The results suggest that unilateral activation of mu- or delta2-opioid, but not delta1-opioid, receptors in the core and/or shell of the nucleus accumbens elicits contraversive pivoting that requires intact dopamine D1/D2 receptors in the shell, but not intact muscarinic M1 mechanism in the core. The study also shows that delta2-opioid, but not mu- and delta1-opioid, receptors in the core and/or shell modulate the shell-specific, dopamine D1/D2 receptor mechanisms involved in the production of pivoting.

Repeated exposure to social stress has long-term effects on indirect markers of dopaminergic activity in brain regions associated with motivated behavior

The visible burrow system (VBS) is a chronic social stress paradigm in which a dominance hierarchy forms among male rats housed with females. Males in the VBS undergo behavioral and physiological changes thought to be manifestations of chronic social stress. Since it is unclear whether chronic social stress affects motivation and reward behavior, brain areas related to these regions were examined. Long-term effects of a single or repeated VBS exposure on mesolimbic subregions were investigated by exposing rats to the VBS either once (one cycle of VBS housing and recovery) or repeatedly (three cycles). Behavior in the VBS was observed and rats were classified as dominants or subordinates. Subordinates were further sub-classified on the basis of stress hormone (corticosterone) response to an acute stressor (i.e. restraint stress). Normal responders were categorized as stress-responsive subordinates (SRS) and animals with a blunted hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response were designated as non-responsive subordinates (NRS). Controls males were pair-housed with a single female during VBS periods and alone during recovery. Lowered enkephalin-mRNA levels were observed in the nucleus accumbens (Acb) after single VBS exposure in SRS and repeated VBS exposure both subordinate groups (i.e. SRS + NRS) compared with controls. Decreased dopamine transporter density was detected after single VBS exposure in the dorsolateral caudate putamen (DLCPu) of NRS and after repeated VBS exposure in the Acb of NRS compared with controls. Dopamine D2 receptor density was elevated after single VBS exposure in the Acb of both subordinate groups (SRS + NRS) and after repeated VBS exposure in the DLCPu, dorsomedial CPu, and Acb of NRS compared with controls. No changes in dopamine D1 receptor binding were observed in any group. These results suggest that long-term changes in dopamine activity in mesolimbic structures persist after repeated exposures to chronic social stress and may provide insight into the neurochemical basis of depressive illness and subsequent comorbidity with drug abuse vulnerability.

Effect of experimenter-delivered and self-administered cocaine on extracellular beta-endorphin levels in the nucleus accumbens

Beta-endorphin is an endogenous opioid peptide that has been hypothesized to be involved in the behavioral effects of drugs of abuse including psychostimulants. Using microdialysis, we studied the effect of cocaine on extracellular levels of beta-endorphin in the nucleus accumbens, a brain region involved in the reinforcing effects of psychostimulant drugs. Experimenter-delivered cocaine (2 mg/kg, i.v.) increased extracellular beta-endorphin immunoreactive levels in the nucleus accumbens, an effect attenuated by 6-hydroxy-dopamine lesions or systemic administration of the D1-like receptor antagonist, SCH-23390 (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.). The effect of cocaine on beta-endorphin release in the nucleus accumbens was mimicked by a local perfusion of dopamine (5 microm) and was blocked by coadministration of SCH-23390 (10 microm). Self-administered cocaine (1 mg/kg/infusion, i.v.) also increased extracellular beta-endorphin levels in the nucleus accumbens. In addition, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that cocaine (1 mg/kg, i.v.) increases regional brain activity in the nucleus accumbens and arcuate nucleus. We demonstrate an increase in beta-endorphin release in the nucleus accumbens following experimenter-delivered and self-administered cocaine mediated by the local dopaminergic system. These findings suggest that activation of the beta-endorphin neurons within the arcuate nucleus-nucleus accumbens pathway may be important in the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the behavioral effects of cocaine.

Involvement of the nucleus accumbens in stimulation of the immune response in rats after activation of opioid mu receptors with DAGO

The involvement of the nucleus accumbens in neuroimmunostimulation was demonstrated during activation of opioid mu receptors with the selective agonist DAGO (100 microg/kg); single doses of this agent to sham-operated (control) Wistar rats induced significant increases in the numbers of direct IgM antibody-forming and total rosette-forming cells after immunization with sheep erythrocytes. Bilateral electrolytic lesioning of the nucleus accumbens in rats led to sharp decreases in the intensity of immune responses; there was no immunostimulation after administration of DAGO to these animals. These data provide evidence for the involvement of the nucleus accumbens in the process of immunomodulation and for the importance of opioid mu receptors in the nucleus accumbens in the stimulation of immunogenesis.

The effects of gonadal hormones on the development and expression of the stimulant effects of morphine in male and female rats

Previous studies have shown that the behavioral activating effects of the stimulant drug amphetamine are augmented in female rats by estradiol. Here we studied the effects of gonadectomy and gonadal hormone replacement on the stimulant effects of morphine in both females and males. Groups of intact, ovariectomized (Ovex), and Ovex females given estradiol benzoate (EB) (5 micrograms), and groups of intact, castrated, and castrated males given testosterone propionate (30 micrograms) were administered five injections of morphine sulphate (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline at 3-day intervals. Activity was monitored on each occasion for 2 h. Among females treated with morphine, intact and Ovex-EB animals showed progressive enhancement of activity over sessions, whereas Ovex animals showed no change. Three days after the last pre-exposure session, all animals received 5 mg/kg morphine in a test for sensitization. In spite of the lower levels of activity in Ovex animals, animals from all groups previously exposed to morphine showed a sensitized response to morphine compared with those receiving morphine for the first time. These findings are virtually identical to our previous findings in female rats treated with amphetamine. Among males, only intact animals showed a progressive increase in morphine-induced activity and only in the second hour of testing, but, overall, there was no significant effect of either group or drug during the pre-exposure phase. On the test for sensitization, as seen in females, those males that had been exposed to morphine previously showed a sensitized responses to morphine. There were, however, no differences in activity levels between the groups of males. We conclude that although gonadal hormones, and in particular estradiol, may modify the magnitude of the response to amphetamine and morphine, they appear not to be involved in those neurochemical and neuronal changes that occur during and following repeated drug exposures, and that underlie the enhanced sensitivity to the stimulant effects of a drug seen when such animals are compared with animals receiving the drug for the first time.

The synaptic framework for chemical signaling in nucleus accumbens

Our knowledge of the organization of the nucleus accumbens has been greatly advanced in the last two decades, but only now are we beginning to understand the complex neural circuitry that underlies the mix of behaviors attributed to this nucleus. Superimposed on the neurochemically defined territories of the shell and core are four or more conduits for information flow. Each of these behaviorally relevant pathways can be characterized by the spatial distribution of inputs to its central unit: the GABAergic projection neuron, a spiny cell that also contains the opioid peptides, enkephalin or dynorphin. In this review, current models of accumbal circuits will be examined and, with the aid of recent anatomical findings, further extended to shed light on how functionally diverse information is processed in this nucleus. However complex, accumbal wiring is not fixed, and, as we will show, psychostimulants, dopamine-deleting lesions, and chronic blockade of dopaminergic receptors can alter the anatomical substrate, synaptology, and neurotrophic factors that govern circuits through the shell and core.

What peptides these deltorphins be

The deltorphins are a class of highly selective delta-opioid heptapeptides from the skin of the Amazonian frogs Phyllomedusa sauvagei and P. bicolor. The first of these fascinating peptides came to light in 1987 by cloning of the cDNA of from frog skins, while the other members of this family were identified either by cDNA or isolation of the peptides. The distinctive feature of deltorphins is the presence of a naturally occurring D-enantiomer at the second position in their common N-terminal sequence, Tyr-D-Xaa-Phe, comparable to dermorphin, which is the prototype of a group of mu-selective opioids from the same source. The D-amino acid and the anionic residues, either Glu or Asp, as well as their unique amino acid compositions are responsible for the remarkable biostability, high delta-receptor affinity, bioactivity and peptide conformation. This review summarizes a decade of research from many laboratories that defined which residues and substituents in the deltorphins interact with the delta-receptor and characterized pharmacological and physiological activities in vitro and in vivo. It begins with a historical description of the topic and presents general schema for the synthesis of peptide analogues of deltorphins A, B and C as a means to document the methods employed in producing a myriad of analogues. Structure activity studies of the peptides and their pharmacological activities in vitro are detailed in abundantly tabulated data. A brief compendium of the current level of knowledge of the delta-receptor assists the reader to appreciate the rationale for the design of these analogues. Discussion of the conformation of these peptides addresses how structure leads to further hypotheses regarding ligand receptor interaction. The review ends with a broad discussion of the potential applications of these peptides in clinical and therapeutic settings.

Differential effects of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in rats

The effects of selective mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine were examined in rats trained to discriminate between cocaine (10 mg/kg) and saline. Cocaine produced a dose-related increase in cocaine-appropriate responses in all of the rats. In generalization tests, neither morphine (mu-opioid receptor agonist) nor N-methyl-N-7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-8-11-4-benzofu ranacetamide (U50,488H: kappa-opioid receptor agonist) generalized to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. On the other hand, the newly synthesized non-peptide selective delta-opioid receptor agonist 2-methyl-4a alpha-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12a alpha-octahydro-quinolino(2,3,3,-g)isoquinoline (TAN-67) partially generalized (56.7% cocaine-appropriate responses) to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II (peptide delta 2-opioid receptor agonist) completely generalized, while neither [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO: mu-opioid receptor agonist) nor [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE; delta 1-opioid receptor agonist) generalized to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine may be partially mediated by delta-opioid (especially delta 2-opioid) receptors. In combination tests, pretreatment with morphine (3.0 mg/kg) and TAN-67 (3.0 and 10 mg/kg) significantly potentiated the discriminative stimulus properties cocaine. In contrast, pretreatment with U50,488H (2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) scarcely shifted the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Furthermore, the potentiating effect of 3.0 mg/kg morphine on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine was attenuated by 2.0 mg/kg U50,488H. In contrast, the potentiating effect of 10 mg/kg TAN-67 on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine was not reversed by either 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg U50,488H. These results suggest that mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists modulate the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine through different mechanisms, perhaps through different effects on the dopaminergic system.

Endogenous opiates: 1995

This article is the eighteenth installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes articles published during 1995 reporting the behavioral effects of the opiate peptides and antagonists, excluding the purely analgesic effects. The specific topics covered this year include stress: tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.