1
|
Hlastala MP, Anderson JC. Alcohol breath test: gas exchange issues. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2016; 121:367-75. [PMID: 27197859 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00548.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The alcohol breath test is reviewed with a focus on gas exchange factors affecting its accuracy. The basis of the alcohol breath test is the assumption that alveolar air reaches the mouth during exhalation with no change in alcohol concentration. Recent investigations have shown that alcohol concentration is altered during its transit to the mouth. The exhaled alcohol concentration is modified by interaction with the mucosa of the pulmonary airways. Exhaled alcohol concentration is not an accurate indicator of alveolar alcohol concentration. Measuring alcohol concentration in the breath is very different process than measuring a blood level from air equilibrated with a blood sample. Airway exchange of alcohol leads to a bias against certain individuals depending on the anatomic and physiologic characteristics. Methodological modifications are proposed to improve the accuracy of the alcohol breath test to become fair to all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Hlastala
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson JC. Measuring breath acetone for monitoring fat loss: Review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23:2327-34. [PMID: 26524104 PMCID: PMC4737348 DOI: 10.1002/oby.21242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endogenous acetone production is a by-product of the fat metabolism process. Because of its small size, acetone appears in exhaled breath. Historically, endogenous acetone has been measured in exhaled breath to monitor ketosis in healthy and diabetic subjects. Recently, breath acetone concentration (BrAce) has been shown to correlate with the rate of fat loss in healthy individuals. In this review, the measurement of breath acetone in healthy subjects is evaluated for its utility in predicting fat loss and its sensitivity to changes in physiologic parameters. RESULTS BrAce can range from 1 ppm in healthy non-dieting subjects to 1,250 ppm in diabetic ketoacidosis. A strong correlation exists between increased BrAce and the rate of fat loss. Multiple metabolic and respiratory factors affect the measurement of BrAce. BrAce is most affected by changes in the following factors (in descending order): dietary macronutrient composition, caloric restriction, exercise, pulmonary factors, and other assorted factors that increase fat metabolism or inhibit acetone metabolism. Pulmonary factors affecting acetone exchange in the lung should be controlled to optimize the breath sample for measurement. CONCLUSIONS When biologic factors are controlled, BrAce measurement provides a non-invasive tool for monitoring the rate of fat loss in healthy subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C. Anderson
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
During inspiration and expiration, gases traverse the conducting airways as they are transported between the environment and the alveolar region of the lungs. The term "conducting" airways is used broadly as the airway tree is thought largely to provide a conduit for the respiratory gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide. However, despite a significantly smaller surface area, and thicker barrier separating the gas phase from the blood when compared to the alveolar region, the airway tree can participate in gas exchange under special conditions such as high water solubility, high chemical reactivity, or production of the gas within the airway wall tissue. While these conditions do not apply to the respiratory gases, other gases demonstrate substantial exchange of the airways and are of particular importance to the inflammatory response of the lungs, the medical-legal field, occupational health, metabolic disorders, or protection of the delicate alveolar membrane. Given the significant structural differences between the airways and the alveolar region, the physical determinants that control airway gas exchange are unique and require different models (both experimental and mathematical) to explore. Our improved physiological understanding of airway gas exchange combined with improved analytical methods to detect trace compounds in the exhaled breath provides future opportunities to develop new exhaled biomarkers that are characteristic of pulmonary and systemic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C George
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Highly blood soluble gases exchange with the bronchial circulation in the airways. On inhalation, air absorbs highly soluble gases from the airway mucosa and equilibrates with the blood before reaching the alveoli. Highly soluble gas partial pressure is identical throughout all alveoli. At the end of exhalation the partial pressure of a highly soluble gas decreases from the alveolar level in the terminal bronchioles to the end-exhaled partial pressure at the mouth. A mathematical model simulated the airway exchange of four gases (methyl isobutyl ketone, acetone, ethanol, and propylene glycol monomethyl ether) that have high water and blood solubility. The impact of solubility on the relative distribution of airway exchange was studied. We conclude that an increase in water solubility shifts the distribution of gas exchange toward the mouth. Of the four gases studied, ethanol had the greatest decrease in partial pressure from the alveolus to the mouth at end exhalation. Single exhalation breath tests are inappropriate for estimating alveolar levels of highly soluble gases, particularly for ethanol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Hlastala
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hlastala MP, Anderson JC. Re: Grubb et al., Breath alcohol analysis incorporating standardization to water vapour is as precise as blood alcohol analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 216 (2012) 88-91. Forensic Sci Int 2012; 223:e61; author reply e62-3. [PMID: 23020869 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2012] [Accepted: 08/22/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
6
|
Gullberg RG, Polissar NL. Factors contributing to the variability observed in duplicate forensic breath alcohol measurement. J Breath Res 2011; 5:016004. [PMID: 21378437 DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/5/1/016004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Several factors contribute to the variability observed among repeated measurements of breath alcohol concentration. Identifying these factors and the magnitude of their contribution is the focus of this study. Large breath alcohol data sets consisting of duplicate test results from drivers arrested for driving while intoxicated were obtained from four jurisdictions: Sweden, Alabama, New Jersey and Washington State. The absolute difference between duplicate results were fitted to a multivariate linear regression model which included the following predictor variables: mean breath alcohol concentration, absolute exhalation time difference between repeated measurements, absolute exhalation volume difference, gender and age. In all data sets considered here, the breath alcohol concentration was the most statistically and practically significant predictor of absolute difference between the duplicate results. The next two most important predictors to enter models for all jurisdictions were exhalation volume difference and exhalation time difference. The maximum multivariate R² for any jurisdiction, however, was only 0.24, suggesting that other factors not considered here may be of importance. Two predictors over which the subject would have some influence included exhalation time and volume. When these were set at values expected to have maximum impact, the effect on duplicate test differences was very small, 0.008 g/210 L or less in all jurisdictions, indicating that subject manipulation of exhalation time and volume would have at most a very small systematic effect on estimated breath alcohol concentration. This study presents multivariate models useful for identifying the impact of five variables that may influence breath test variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Gullberg
- Breath Alcohol Test Program, Washington State Patrol, 811 East Roanoke, Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Z, Kleinstreuer C. Deposition of naphthalene and tetradecane vapors in models of the human respiratory system. Inhal Toxicol 2011; 23:44-57. [DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2010.540261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
8
|
Thekedar B, Oeh U, Szymczak W, Hoeschen C, Paretzke HG. Influences of mixed expiratory sampling parameters on exhaled volatile organic compound concentrations. J Breath Res 2010; 5:016001. [DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/5/1/016001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
9
|
Heberlein A, Lenz B, Degner D, Kornhuber J, Hillemacher T, Bleich S. Methanol Levels in Saliva--A Non-Invasive Parameter That May Be Useful in Detection of Alcohol Intoxication. Alcohol Alcohol 2010; 45:126-7. [DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agq003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
10
|
Baumbach JI. Ion mobility spectrometry coupled with multi-capillary columns for metabolic profiling of human breath. J Breath Res 2009; 3:034001. [PMID: 21383463 DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/3/3/034001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Recently, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) started to be used for direct breath analysis with respect to metabolic profiling, biomarker finding and gas trace analysis. The present review describes the basic operation of an ion mobility spectrometer including the ionization process, humidity effects and sampling procedures. To enhance the resolution, pre-separation by multi-capillary columns (MCCs) is discussed and examples for IMS chromatograms are presented. The focus is to review the analytical method IMS with respect to potential use for direct investigations of humid air in direct breath analysis but not on detailed discussion of results of specific medical application of MCC/IMS or on specific analytes found in exhaled air.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Ingo Baumbach
- ISAS-Institute for Analytical Sciences, Department of Metabolomics, Bunsen-Kirchhoff-Straße 11, 44139 Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Hara ME, O'Hehir S, Green S, Mayhew CA. Development of a protocol to measure volatile organic compounds in human breath: a comparison of rebreathing and on-line single exhalations using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Physiol Meas 2008; 29:309-30. [PMID: 18367807 DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/3/003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on human breath has great potential as a non-invasive diagnostic technique. It is, therefore, surprising that no single, standard procedure has evolved for breath sampling. Here we present a novel repeated-cycle isothermal rebreathing method, where one cycle comprises five rebreaths, which could be adopted for breath analysis of VOCs. For demonstration purposes, we present measurements of three common breath VOCs: isoprene, acetone and methanol. Their concentrations measured in breath are shown to increase with number of rebreaths until a plateau value is reached by at least 20 rebreaths. The average ratio of plateau concentration to single mixed expired breath concentration was found to be 1.92 +/- 0.57 for isoprene, 1.25 +/- 0.13 for acetone and 1.12 +/- 0.12 for methanol (mean +/- standard deviation). Measurements from on-line single exhalations are presented which demonstrate a positive slope in the time-dependent expirograms of isoprene and acetone. The slope of the isoprene expirogram is persistently linear and the end-expired concentration of isoprene is highly variable in the same subject depending on the duration of exhalation. End-expired values of acetone are not as sensitive to the length of exhalation, and are the same to within measurement uncertainty for any duration of exhalation for any subject. It is concluded that uncontrolled single on-line exhalations are not suitable for the reliable measurement of isoprene in the breath and that rebreathing can be the basis of an easily tolerated protocol for the reliable collection of breath samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E O'Hara
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The field of respiratory flow and transport has experienced significant research activity over the past several years. Important contributions to the knowledge base come from pulmonary and critical care medicine, surgery, physiology, environmental health sciences, biophysics, and engineering. Several disciplines within engineering have strong and historical ties to respiration including mechanical, chemical, civil/environmental, aerospace and, of course, biomedical engineering. This review draws from a wide variety of scientific literature that reflects the diverse constituency and audience that respiratory science has developed. The subject areas covered include nasal flow and transport, airway gas flow, alternative modes of ventilation, nonrespiratory gas transport, aerosol transport, airway stability, mucus transport, pulmonary acoustics, surfactant dynamics and delivery, and pleural liquid flow. Within each area are a number of subtopics whose exploration can provide the opportunity of both depth and breadth for the interested reader.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Grotberg
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan, 3304 G.G. Brown Bldg., 2350 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shin HY, George SC. Microscopic modeling of NO and S-nitrosoglutathione kinetics and transport in human airways. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2001; 90:777-88. [PMID: 11181583 DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.3.777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) appears in the exhaled breath and is elevated in inflammatory diseases. We developed a steady-state mathematical model of the bronchial mucosa for normal small and large airways to understand NO and S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) kinetics and transport using data from the existing literature. Our model predicts that mean steady-state NO and GSNO concentrations for large airways (generation 1) are 2.68 nM and 113 pM, respectively, in the epithelial cells and 0.11 nM (approximately 66 ppb) and 507 nM in the mucus. For small airways (generation 15), the mean concentrations of NO and GSNO, respectively, are 0.26 nM and 21 pM in the epithelial cells and 0.02 nM (approximately 12 ppb) and 132 nM in the mucus. The concentrations in the mucus compare favorably to experimentally measured values. We conclude that 1) the majority of free NO in the mucus, and thus exhaled NO, is due to diffusion of free NO from the epithelial cell and 2) the heterogeneous airway contribution to exhaled NO is due to heterogeneous airway geometries, such as epithelium and mucus thickness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Y Shin
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bui TD, Dabdub D, George SC. Modeling bronchial circulation with application to soluble gas exchange: description and sensitivity analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1998; 84:2070-88. [PMID: 9609803 DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.6.2070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The steady-state exchange of inert gases across an in situ canine trachea has recently been shown to be limited equally by diffusion and perfusion over a wide range (0.01-350) of blood solubilities (betablood; ml . ml-1 . atm-1). Hence, we hypothesize that the exchange of ethanol (betablood = 1,756 at 37 degrees C) in the airways depends on the blood flow rate from the bronchial circulation. To test this hypothesis, the dynamics of the bronchial circulation were incorporated into an existing model that describes the simultaneous exchange of heat, water, and a soluble gas in the airways. A detailed sensitivity analysis of key model parameters was performed by using the method of Latin hypercube sampling. The model accurately predicted a previously reported experimental exhalation profile of ethanol (R2 = 0.991) as well as the end-exhalation airstream temperature (34.6 degrees C). The model predicts that 27, 29, and 44% of exhaled ethanol in a single exhalation are derived from the tissues of the mucosa and submucosa, the bronchial circulation, and the tissue exterior to the submucosa (which would include the pulmonary circulation), respectively. Although the concentration of ethanol in the bronchial capillary decreased during inspiration, the three key model outputs (end-exhaled ethanol concentration, the slope of phase III, and end-exhaled temperature) were all statistically insensitive (P > 0.05) to the parameters describing the bronchial circulation. In contrast, the model outputs were all sensitive (P < 0.05) to the thickness of tissue separating the core body conditions from the bronchial smooth muscle. We conclude that both the bronchial circulation and the pulmonary circulation impact soluble gas exchange when the entire conducting airway tree is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T D Bui
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2575, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The alcohol breath test (ABT) is evaluated for variability in response to changes in physiological parameters. The ABT was originally developed in the 1950s, at a time when understanding of pulmonary physiology was quite limited. Over the past decade, physiological studies have shown that alcohol is exchanged entirely within the conducting airways via diffusion from the bronchial circulation. This is in sharp contrast to the old idea that alcohol exchanges in the alveoli in a manner similar to the lower solubility respiratory gases (O2 and CO2). The airway alcohol exchange process is diffusion (airway tissue) and perfusion (bronchial circulation) limited. The dynamics of airway alcohol exchange results in a positively sloped exhaled alveolar plateau that contributes to considerable breathing pattern-dependent variation in measured breath alcohol concentration measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Hlastala
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-6522, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
George SC, Hlastala MP, Souders JE, Babb AL. Gas exchange in the airways. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR AEROSOLS IN MEDICINE 1997; 9:25-33. [PMID: 10172721 DOI: 10.1089/jam.1996.9.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The primary function of the lungs is to exchange the respiratory gases, O2 and CO2, between the atmosphere and the blood. Our overall understanding of the lungs as a gas-exchanging organ has improved considerably over the past four decades. We now know that the dynamics of gas exchange depend on the blood solubility (beta b, ml gas ml blood-1 atm-1) of the gas. While the major focus of research has rightly been on the respiratory gases, the lungs exchange a wide spectrum of gases ranging from very low solubility gases such as SF6 or helium (beta b = 0.01) to water vapor (beta b = 20,000). O2 (beta b = 0.7) and CO2 (beta b = 3.0) exchange primarily in the alveolar region of the lung and their exchange is limited by the rate of ventilation and perfusion. In contrast, highly soluble gases (beta b > 100) are likely to exchange primarily in the airways of the lung. We have used exhaled ethanol (beta b = 1756) profiles for humans, steady-state exchange of six inert gases (0.01 < beta b < 300) in an in situ dog trachea, and a mathematical model to analyze the dynamics of airway gas exchange. We make the following conclusion: (1) ethanol exchanges entirely within the airways, and (2) the magnitude of perfusion- and diffusion-related resistance to airway gas exchange is the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C George
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|