The effect of motilin on the gastrointestinal propulsion in rats

Comparison of the gastroprokinetic effects of ghrelin, GHRP-6 and motilin in rats in vivo and in vitro

Ghrelin and motilin form a new family of structurally related peptides. We compared the gastroprokinetic effects of ghrelin, the ghrelin receptor agonist, growth hormone releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6), and motilin in rats in vivo and in vitro.

METHODS

Ghrelin, GHRP-6 or motilin (10-150 microg/kg) were injected i.p. and the effects on gastric emptying and transit were measured after intragastric application of Evans blue. In antral and fundic strips the effect of motilin, ghrelin or GHRP-6 was studied during electrical field stimulation (EFS) in the absence and presence of N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (l-NAME) (300 microM).

RESULTS

Ghrelin and GHRP-6 but not motilin accelerated gastric emptying and transit in rats. Ghrelin was more potent than GHRP-6 and the dose-response relationship for ghrelin but not for GHRP-6 was bell-shaped. In fundic or antral strips, neural responses to EFS consisted of an on-relaxation that was reversed into a cholinergically mediated contraction by addition of the nitric oxide (NO)-synthase blocker, l-NAME. The post-stimulus off-contraction was cholinergically mediated. Under normal conditions, the ghrelin agonists reduced the on-relaxations in fundic strips and increased the cholinergic off-contractions in antral and fundic strips. The concentration response curves in muscle strips of the fundus were bell-shaped with maximal effects for ghrelin at 1.2 microM (on-responses) and 0.66 microM (off-responses) and for GHRP-6 at 0.50 microM (on-responses) and 0.26 microM (off-responses). No effects were observed with motilin between 1 nM and 0.1 microM. Studies in the presence of l-NAME confirmed the effect of the ghrelin agonists on cholinergic excitatory motor responses. No effects were observed with motilin under the different experimental conditions. The presence of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a transcripts in the strip preparations was confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

CONCLUSION

Ghrelin and GHRP-6 but not motilin accelerate gastric emptying and transit by activating cholinergic excitatory pathways in the enteric nervous system in addition to the known vagal pathways.

Plasma glucagon, glucose, insulin, and motilin in rats anticipating daily meals

The circadian food entrainable oscillator (FEO) mediates an increase in activity preceding access to periodic meals. The FEO is anatomically independent of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), but its locus remains to be established. Whether the FEO is located in the central nervous system (CNS) or in the periphery, it seems reasonable to assume that there is a link of communication between the digestive system and the CNS because only nutritive meals entrain the FEO. Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and visceral deafferentation with capsaicin do not eliminate food-anticipatory activity (FAA), indicating that a neural signal is not necessary. The present study investigates the hypothesis that humoral signals from the digestive system act upon the CNS to trigger or entrain FAA. Intact rats and rats with SCN lesions were entrained to daily meals and then sacrificed prior to FAA or during FAA, but before meal access. Average plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin were nearly identical in both groups. Plasma and duodenal mucosal motilin concentrations also were not different between the two times. Corticosterone was elevated during anticipation, but the difference was not statistically reliable. Glucagon concentration was decreased during FAA compared to concentration prior to FAA in both intact and SCN-lesioned subjects. This difference was not observed in control rats fasted for the same number of hours, but not previously entrained to a daily meal. Although the decrease in glucagon could be a signal that initiates FAA, a causal role remains to be established.