Temporary and permanent biventricular pacing via left ventricular epicardial leads implanted during primary cardiac surgery

Primary endpoints of the biventricular pacing after cardiac surgery trial

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine whether optimized biventricular pacing increases cardiac index in patients at risk of left ventricular dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. Procedures included coronary artery bypass, aortic or mitral surgery and combinations. This trial was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board and was conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption.

METHODS

Screening of 6,346 patients yielded 47 endpoints. With informed consent, 61 patients were randomized to pacing or control groups. Atrioventricular and interventricular delays were optimized 1 (phase I), 2 (phase II), and 12 to 24 hours (phase III) after bypass in all patients. Cardiac index was measured by thermal dilution in triplicate. A 2-sample t test assessed differences between groups and subgroups.

RESULTS

Cardiac index was 12% higher (2.83±0.16 [standard error of the mean] vs 2.52±0.13 liters/minute/square meter) in the paced group, less than predicted and not statistically significant (p=0.14). However, when aortic and aortic-mitral surgery groups were combined, cardiac index increased 29% in the paced group (2.90±0.19, n=14) versus controls (2.24±0.15, n=11) (p=0.0138). Using a linear mixed effects model, t-test revealed that mean arterial pressure increased with pacing versus no pacing at all optimization points (phase I 79.2±1.7 vs 74.5±1.6 mm Hg, p=0.008; phase II 75.9±1.5 vs 73.6±1.8, p=0.006; phase III 81.9±2.8 vs 79.5±2.7, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac index did not increase significantly overall but increased 29% after aortic valve surgery. Mean arterial pressure increased with pacing at 3 time points. Additional studies are needed to distinguish rate from resynchronization effects, emphasize atrioventricular delay optimization, and examine clinical benefits of temporary postoperative pacing.

Hemodynamic stability during biventricular pacing after cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE

To assess the stability of cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance during biventricular pacing (BiVP) optimization.

DESIGN

Substudy analysis of data collected as part of a randomized controlled study examining the effects of optimized temporary BiVP after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

SETTING

A single-center study at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac surgery patients at risk of left ventricular failure after CPB.

INTERVENTIONS

BiVP was optimized immediately after CPB. Atrioventricular delay (7 unique settings) was optimized first, followed by the left ventricular pacing site (3 unique settings) and then the interventricular delay (9 unique settings). Each setting was tested twice for 10 seconds each time. Vasoactive medication and fluid infusion rates were held constant.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Aortic flow velocity and radial artery pressure were digitized, recorded, and averaged over single respiratory cycles. Least squares and linear regression/Wilcoxon analyses were applied to the first 7 patients studied. Subsequently, curvilinear analysis was applied to 15 patients. Changes in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance were statistically insignificant or too small to be meaningful by least squares analysis. During interventricular synchrony optimization, cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased (mean changes -5.7% and -2.5%, respectively; with standard errors 2.3% and 1.5%, respectively), whereas SVR increased (mean change 3.1% with standard error 3.4%). Only the change in cardiac output was statistically significant (p = 0.043). Curvilinear fits to data for 15 patients demonstrated progressive hemodynamic stability over the total testing period.

CONCLUSION

BiVP optimization may be done safely in patients after CPB. With continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, the procedure results in no harmful hemodynamic perturbation.

Relation of QRS shortening to cardiac output during temporary resynchronization therapy after cardiac surgery

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve cardiac function in heart failure without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption. However, CRT optimization based on hemodynamics or echocardiography is difficult. QRS duration (QRSd) is a possible alternative optimization parameter. Accordingly, we assessed QRSd optimization of CRT during cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that QRSd shortening during changes in interventricular pacing delay (VVD) would increase cardiac output (CO). Seven patients undergoing coronary artery bypass, aortic or mitral valve surgery with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < or =40%, and QRSd > or =100 msec were studied. CRT was implemented at epicardial pacing sites in the left and right ventricle and right atrium during VVD variation after cardiopulmonary bypass. QRSd was correlated with CO from an electromagnetic aortic flow probe. Both positive and negative correlations were observed. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.70 to -0.74 during VVD testing. Clear minima in QRSd were observed in four patients and were within 40 msec of maximum CO in two. We conclude that QRSd is not useful for routine optimization of VVD after cardiac surgery but may be useful in selected patients. Decreasing QRSd is associated with decreasing CO in some patients, suggesting that CRT can affect determinants of QRSd and ventricular function independently.

Temporary biventricular pacing postcardiopulmonary bypass in patients with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients with low ejection fraction (EF) undergoing myocardial revascularization frequently require ventricular pacing following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). While the benefits of chronic biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with low EF are well established, there are little data on acute effects during heart surgery. This study analyzed the response of BiV versus single ventricle lead pacing on hemodynamics and left ventricular (LV) function immediately following CPB.

METHODS

Ten patients with decreased LV EF (mean = 35 +/- 6%) underwent open-heart surgery with CPB. Temporary pacing electrodes were placed on the right atrium, apex of the right ventricle, and lateral wall of the LV after separation from CPB. The hemodynamic effects of three atrio-ventricular (right, left, and BiV) pacing modes were studied for four minutes each. The pacing sequence was randomly allocated with a resting period of three minutes between each mode. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data of LV function were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

BiV pacing increased cardiac output by 4%, 13%, and 44% over right ventricular pacing, LV pacing, and pre-bypass values, respectively. The fractional area of change increased significantly with BiV pacing compared to right ventricular and LV pacing (36%, 35% to 44%, p < 0.01). An increased propagation velocity of 49 cm/s compared to 38 cm/s and 40 cm/s for right ventricular and LV pacing, respectively, suggested an improvement in diastolic function.

CONCLUSION

In patients with low EF, BiV pacing immediately after CPB significantly improves LV systolic function and cardiac output, and suggests significantly improved diastolic function.

Four-chamber pacing in patients with poor ejection fraction but normal QRS durations undergoing open heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Poor ejection fraction (EF) comprises a critical risk factor in cardiac bypass surgery (CABG). It has been unclear, whether biventricular or four-chamber pacing confers benefit upon patients with intact atrioventricular and interventricular conduction especially following surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with an EF <or= 35% underwent hemodynamic evaluation (continuous pressures and thermodilution) 3, 6, and 18 hours post-CABG and biatrial (AA), biatrial-right ventricular (AAV), and biatrial-biventricular (AAVV) pacing were compared.

RESULTS

Patients (65 +/- 9 years) presented with an average EF of 29.5% (15-35%). 514 measurements of cardiac index (CI) were taken. Nineteen patients (91%) showed highly significant increases in CI with AAVV as compared to AA pacing (P < 0,001) at all times post surgery. The increase in CI with pacing mode varied from 6% to 25% and decreased with time following surgery. No consistent difference in CI was seen between four-chamber (AAVV) and biventricular pacing (AVV). The QRS-widths prior to surgery never exceeded 120 ms; postoperatively QRS-complexes widened in all patients on average by 15.9 ms +/-6 and returned to starting values by 48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Biventricular pacing improves CI in patients with poor EF following cardiac surgery in the absence of preoperative atrioventricular- or interventricular conduction block. This benefit decreases with time after surgery as the QRS width returns to preoperative values. Four-chamber pacing did not confer additional benefit as compared to biventricular pacing in this series. Biventricular pacing should be considered as an adjunct in patients with critically low EF undergoing cardiac surgery.

Effects of sequential biventricular pacing during acute right ventricular pressure overload

Temporary sequential biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a promising treatment for postoperative cardiac dysfunction, but the mechanism for improvement in right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is not understood. In the present study, cardiac output (CO) was optimized by sequential BiVP in six anesthetized, open-chest pigs during control and acute RV pressure overload (RVPO). Ventricular contractility was assessed by the maximum rate of increase of ventricular pressure (dP/d tmax). Mechanical interventricular synchrony was measured by the area of the normalized RV-left ventricular (LV) pressure diagram ( APP). Positive APP indicates RV pressure preceding LV pressure, whereas zero indicates complete synchrony. In the control state, CO was maximized with nearly simultaneous stimulation of the RV and LV, which increased RV ( P = 0.006) and LV dP/d tmax ( P = 0.002). During RVPO, CO was maximized with RV-first pacing, which increased RV dP/d tmax ( P = 0.007), but did not affect LV dP/d tmax, and decreased the left-to-right, end-diastolic pressure gradient ( P = 0.023). Percent increase of RV dP/d tmax was greater than LV dP/d tmax ( P = 0.014). There were no increases in end-diastolic pressure to account for increases in dP/d tmax. In control and RVPO, RV dP/dtmax was linearly related to APP ( r = 0.779, P < 0.001). The relation of CO to APP was curvilinear, with a peak in CO with positive APP in the control state ( P = 0.004) and with APP approaching zero during RVPO ( P = 0.001). These observations imply that, in our model, BiVP optimization improves CO by augmenting RV contractility. This is mediated by changes in mechanical interventricular synchrony. Afterload increases during RVPO exaggerate this effect, making CO critically dependent on simultaneous pressure generation in the RV and LV, with support of RV contractility by transmission of LV pressure across the interventricular septum.