1
|
Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Damage: Oxidative Stress and Epigenetic Mechanisms. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2019; 2019:3010342. [PMID: 31781332 PMCID: PMC6875293 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3010342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is currently one of the leading treatments for various cancers; however, it may cause damage to healthy tissue, with both short-term and long-term side effects. Severe radiation-induced normal tissue damage (RINTD) frequently has a significant influence on the progress of RT and the survival and prognosis of patients. The redox system has been shown to play an important role in the early and late effects of RINTD. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are the main sources of RINTD. The free radicals produced by irradiation can upregulate several enzymes including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NADPH oxidase), lipoxygenases (LOXs), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and cyclooxygenases (COXs). These enzymes are expressed in distinct ways in various cells, tissues, and organs and participate in the RINTD process through different regulatory mechanisms. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that epigenetic modulators play an important role in the RINTD process. Epigenetic modifications primarily contain noncoding RNA regulation, histone modifications, and DNA methylation. In this article, we will review the role of oxidative stress and epigenetic mechanisms in radiation damage, and explore possible prophylactic and therapeutic strategies for RINTD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen J, Huang L, Zhu Q, Wang Z, Tang Z. MTSS1 hypermethylation is associated with prostate cancer progression. J Cell Physiol 2019; 235:2687-2697. [PMID: 31541465 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of DNA methylation of metastasis suppressor 1 (MTSS1) on prostate cancer (PCa) progression. Forty-nine paired PCa tissue samples and normal tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas were analyzed. Methylome analysis, CpG island arrays and Hierarchical clustering were used to analyze methylation profiles of PCa tissues. MTSS1 methylation level was detected by methylation-specific PCR. Relative messenger RNA and the expression level of MTSS1 protein were identified by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot analysis. The migration, invasion, proliferation, and cell cycle were detected separately by wound-healing assay, transwell chamber assay, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay and flow cytometry. The roles of MTSS1 in PCa progression were demonstrated in vivo by tumor formation assays in nude mice. MTSS1 expression was decreased in PCa tissues in comparison with paired adjacent normal prostate tissues. Compared to the methylation of MTSS1 in normal prostate tissues based on the MethHC website, the MTSS1 in PCa tissues was hypermethylated. The expression of MTSS1 detected by qRT-PCR and western blot analysis was found to be downregulated in PCa cells and tissues. The reduced expression of MTSS1 by small interfering RNA-MTSS1 was recovered by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment. Besides, MTSS1 demethylation inhibited migration, invasion, and proliferation of PCa cells, and induced cell cycle to be arrested at G0/G1 phase. Furthermore, it was shown by tumor xenograft assay that MTSS1 inhibited the growth of tumor in vivo. Hypermethylated MTSS1 promoted PCa cells migration, invasion, and proliferation, and suppressed cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjie Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Liang Huang
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Quan Zhu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhao Wang
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhengyan Tang
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.,Hunan Engineering Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment Technology of Urogenital Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anticancer Activity of Sulforaphane: The Epigenetic Mechanisms and the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2018; 2018:5438179. [PMID: 29977456 PMCID: PMC6011061 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5438179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Sulforaphane (SFN), a compound derived from cruciferous vegetables that has been shown to be safe and nontoxic, with minimal/no side effects, has been extensively studied due to its numerous bioactivities, such as anticancer and antioxidant activities. SFN exerts its anticancer effects by modulating key signaling pathways and genes involved in the induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of angiogenesis. SFN also upregulates a series of cytoprotective genes by activating nuclear factor erythroid-2- (NF-E2-) related factor 2 (Nrf2), a critical transcription factor activated in response to oxidative stress; Nrf2 activation is also involved in the cancer-preventive effects of SFN. Accumulating evidence supports that epigenetic modification is an important factor in carcinogenesis and cancer progression, as epigenetic alterations often contribute to the inhibition of tumor-suppressor genes and the activation of oncogenes, which enables cells to acquire cancer-promoting properties. Studies on the mechanisms underlying the anticancer effects of SFN have shown that SFN can reverse such epigenetic alterations in cancers by targeting DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), histone deacetyltransferases (HDACs), and noncoding RNAs. Therefore, in this review, we will discuss the anticancer activities of SFN and its mechanisms, with a particular emphasis on epigenetic modifications, including epigenetic reactivation of Nrf2.
Collapse
|
4
|
LI YUANXIA, WAN XIAOLEI, WEI YE, LIU XIUWEN, LAI WENSHENG, ZHANG LIUPING, JIN JIE, WU CHAOYANG, SHAO QIXIANG, SHAO GENBAO, LIN QIONG. LSD1-mediated epigenetic modification contributes to ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion. Oncol Rep 2016; 35:3586-92. [DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
5
|
Verma M. The Role of Epigenomics in the Study of Cancer Biomarkers and in the Development of Diagnostic Tools. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2016; 867:59-80. [PMID: 26530360 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Epigenetics plays a key role in cancer development. Genetics alone cannot explain sporadic cancer and cancer development in individuals with no family history or a weak family history of cancer. Epigenetics provides a mechanism to explain the development of cancer in such situations. Alterations in epigenetic profiling may provide important insights into the etiology and natural history of cancer. Because several epigenetic changes occur before histopathological changes, they can serve as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and risk assessment. Many cancers may remain asymptomatic until relatively late stages; in managing the disease, efforts should be focused on early detection, accurate prediction of disease progression, and frequent monitoring. This chapter describes epigenetic biomarkers as they are expressed during cancer development and their potential use in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Based on epigenomic information, biomarkers have been identified that may serve as diagnostic tools; some such biomarkers also may be useful in identifying individuals who will respond to therapy and survive longer. The importance of analytical and clinical validation of biomarkers is discussed, along with challenges and opportunities in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukesh Verma
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Suite# 4E102. 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9763, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9726, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Almeida M, Costa VL, Costa NR, Ramalho-Carvalho J, Baptista T, Ribeiro FR, Paulo P, Teixeira MR, Oliveira J, Lothe RA, Lind GE, Henrique R, Jerónimo C. Epigenetic regulation of EFEMP1 in prostate cancer: biological relevance and clinical potential. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18:2287-97. [PMID: 25211630 PMCID: PMC4224561 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic alterations are common in prostate cancer (PCa) and seem to contribute decisively to its initiation and progression. Moreover, aberrant promoter methylation is a promising biomarker for non-invasive screening. Herein, we sought to characterize EFEMP1 as biomarker for PCa, unveiling its biological relevance in prostate carcinogenesis. Microarray analyses of treated PCa cell lines and primary tissues enabled the selection of differentially methylated genes, among which EFEMP1 was further validated by MSP and bisulfite sequencing. Assessment of biomarker performance was accomplished by qMSP. Expression analysis of EFEMP1 and characterization of histone marks were performed in tissue samples and cancer cell lines to determine the impact of epigenetic mechanisms on EFEMP1 transcriptional regulation. Phenotypic assays, using transfected cell lines, permitted the evaluation of EFEMP1’s role in PCa development. EFEMP1 methylation assay discriminated PCa from normal prostate tissue (NPT; P < 0.001, Kruskall–Wallis test) and renal and bladder cancers (96% sensitivity and 98% specificity). EFEMP1 transcription levels inversely correlated with promoter methylation and histone deacetylation, suggesting that both epigenetic mechanisms are involved in gene regulation. Phenotypic assays showed that EFEMP1 de novo expression reduces malignant phenotype of PCa cells. EFEMP1 promoter methylation is prevalent in PCa and accurately discriminates PCa from non-cancerous prostate tissues and other urological neoplasms. This epigenetic alteration occurs early in prostate carcinogenesis and, in association with histone deacetylation, progressively leads to gene down-regulation, fostering cell proliferation, invasion and evasion of apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mafalda Almeida
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of the Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Periasamy J, Muthuswami M, Rao DB, Tan P, Ganesan K. Stratification and delineation of gastric cancer signaling by in vitro transcription factor activity profiling and integrative genomics. Cell Signal 2014; 26:880-94. [PMID: 24462706 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2013] [Revised: 01/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Integrative functional genomic approaches are helpful in delineating the complex dysregulations in cancers. In the present study, in vitro activity profiling of 45 signaling pathway driven transcription factors in eight gastric cancer cell lines and direct comparison with genome-wide profiles of gastric tumors were performed and the integration resulted in the identification of three categories of factors/pathways: i) highly activated signaling pathways that stem from mutations are the critical oncogenic drivers, ii) constitutively activated stress responsive pathways which are activated not due to genetic alterations, and iii) consistently down-regulated nuclear receptor responsive factors. This functional profiling helps in discriminating therapeutic targets and signaling interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayaprakash Periasamy
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre for Excellence in Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India
| | - Muthulakshmi Muthuswami
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre for Excellence in Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India
| | - Divya Bhaskar Rao
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre for Excellence in Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India
| | - Patrick Tan
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore
| | - Kumaresan Ganesan
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Centre for Excellence in Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Esterhuyse MM, Kaufmann SH. Diagnostic biomarkers are hidden in the infected host's epigenome. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2013; 13:625-37. [PMID: 23895131 DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2013.811897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The success of our immune system depends on its ability to react efficiently, which in turn is supported by a large degree of plasticity as well as memory. Some aspects of this plasticity and memory are now known to be under epigenetic control - determined both by default, during differentiation, and by responses to environmental factors, including infectious agents. Thus, epigenetic marks in the immune system can occur as predetermined or as responsive marks and as such can potentially serve as diagnostic markers for disease susceptibility and disease progression or treatment response. Here, the authors review some examples of epigenetic control and epigenetic marks during the differentiation process of the immune system and memory formation, followed by some examples of epigenetic marks in the immune system subsequent to infection. These are used to illustrate the potential use of epigenetic marks as diagnostic markers in adverse immune system conditions and treatment thereof.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria M Esterhuyse
- Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Department of Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
After completion of the human genome, genome-wide association studies were conducted to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with cancer initiation and progression. Most of the studies identified SNPs that were located outside the coding region, and the odds ratios were too low to implement in clinical practice. Although the genome gives information about genome sequence and structure, the human epigenome provides functional aspects of the genome. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) provide an opportunity to identify genome-wide epigenetic variants that are associated with cancer. However, there are problems and issues in implementing EWAS to establish an association between epigenetic profiles and cancer. Few challenges include selection and handling of samples, choice of population and sample size, accurate measurement of exposure, integrating data, and insufficient information about the role of repeat sequences. The current status of EWAS, challenges in the field, and their potential solutions are discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukesh Verma
- Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Division of Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 6130 Executive Boulevard, Suite 5100, Bethesda, MD 20892-7324, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liebman MN, Molinaro S. Computational modeling and epidemiologic approaches: a new section of the Journal of Translational Medicine. J Transl Med 2012; 10:210. [PMID: 23075423 PMCID: PMC3494520 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2012] [Accepted: 10/16/2012] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A new section of the Journal of Translational Medicine is being introduced to encourage rapid communication of methods and results that utilize computational modeling and epidemiologic approaches in translational medicine. The focus will be on population-based studies that extend towards more molecular level analysis. Submission of studies involving methods development is encouraged where actual application and results can be shown in the healthcare and life sciences domains.
Collapse
|
11
|
Verma M. Cancer control and prevention by nutrition and epigenetic approaches. Antioxid Redox Signal 2012; 17:355-64. [PMID: 22047027 PMCID: PMC3357077 DOI: 10.1089/ars.2011.4388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2011] [Accepted: 11/03/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Epigenetics involves alterations in gene expression without changing the nucleotide sequence. Because some epigenetic changes can be reversed chemically, epigenetics has tremendous implications for disease intervention and treatment. RECENT ADVANCES After epigenetic components in cancer were characterized, genes and pathways are being characterized in other diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and neurological disorders. Observational, experimental, and clinical studies in different diseases have shown that nutrients influence epigenetic regulation. Nutrients such as folic acid that supply methyl groups have been shown to have a protective effect in colon cancer. CRITICAL ISSUES Identifying steps during epigenetic regulation and developing intervention and treatment agents are the critical issues in the field. FUTURE DIRECTIONS Following completion and validation of key observational studies in nutritional epigenetics, strategies can be developed for cancer control and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukesh Verma
- Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Can the battle against tuberculosis gain from epigenetic research? Trends Microbiol 2012; 20:220-6. [PMID: 22464289 DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2012] [Revised: 02/29/2012] [Accepted: 03/02/2012] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A healthy immune system needs to be highly plastic to cope with host defense and surveillance. What mechanisms provide this plasticity? Considering the threat of infectious diseases to a large part of the world's population, can these mechanisms possibly be of use in the ongoing battle against infectious diseases? Against the backdrop of the pandemic nature of tuberculosis, we discuss whether and how epigenetic mechanisms can shed light on our understanding of infectious disease, and if epigenetic marks can be employed to monitor latent infection, disease reactivation or treatment response.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Biochemical, epigenetic, genetic, and imaging biomarkers are used to identify people at high risk for developing cancer. In cancer epidemiology, epigenetic biomarkers offer advantages over other types of biomarkers because they are expressed against a person's genetic background and environmental exposure, and because epigenetic events occur early in cancer development. This chapter describes epigenetic biomarkers that are being used to study the epidemiology of different types of cancer. Because epigenetic alterations can be reversed by chemicals and activate gene expression, epigenetic biomarkers potentially have numerous clinical applications in cancer intervention and treatment and significant implications in public health. This review discusses cancer biomarkers, the characteristics of an ideal biomarker for cancer, and technologies for biomarker detection.
Collapse
|
14
|
Verma M, Patel P, Verma M. Biomarkers in prostate cancer epidemiology. Cancers (Basel) 2011; 3:3773-98. [PMID: 24213111 PMCID: PMC3763396 DOI: 10.3390/cancers3043773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2011] [Revised: 09/26/2011] [Accepted: 09/26/2011] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the etiology of a disease such as prostate cancer may help in identifying populations at high risk, timely intervention of the disease, and proper treatment. Biomarkers, along with exposure history and clinical data, are useful tools to achieve these goals. Individual risk and population incidence of prostate cancer result from the intervention of genetic susceptibility and exposure. Biochemical, epigenetic, genetic, and imaging biomarkers are used to identify people at high risk for developing prostate cancer. In cancer epidemiology, epigenetic biomarkers offer advantages over other types of biomarkers because they are expressed against a person's genetic background and environmental exposure, and because abnormal events occur early in cancer development, which includes several epigenetic alterations in cancer cells. This article describes different biomarkers that have potential use in studying the epidemiology of prostate cancer. We also discuss the characteristics of an ideal biomarker for prostate cancer, and technologies utilized for biomarker assays. Among epigenetic biomarkers, most reports indicate GSTP1 hypermethylation as the diagnostic marker for prostate cancer; however, NKX2-5, CLSTN1, SPOCK2, SLC16A12, DPYS, and NSE1 also have been reported to be regulated by methylation mechanisms in prostate cancer. Current challenges in utilization of biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and epidemiologic studies and potential solutions also are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukesh Verma
- Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institues of Health (NIH), 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, USA; E-Mail:
| | - Payal Patel
- Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institues of Health (NIH), 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, USA; E-Mail:
| | - Mudit Verma
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Clinical Research Center, National Cancer Institute, National Institues of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; E-Mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Akhoondi S, Lindström L, Widschwendter M, Corcoran M, Bergh J, Spruck C, Grandér D, Sangfelt O. Inactivation of FBXW7/hCDC4-β expression by promoter hypermethylation is associated with favorable prognosis in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12:R105. [PMID: 21122106 PMCID: PMC3046450 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2010] [Revised: 11/05/2010] [Accepted: 12/01/2010] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mutational inactivation of the FBXW7/hCDC4 tumor suppressor gene (TSG) is common in many cancer types, but infrequent in breast cancers. This study investigates the presence and impact of FBXW7/hCDC4 promoter methylation in breast cancer. METHODS FBXW7/hCDC4-β expression and promoter methylation was assessed in 161 tumors from two independent breast cancer cohorts. Associations between methylation status and clinicopathologic characteristics were assessed by Fisher's exact test. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method in addition to modeling the risk by use of a multivariate proportional hazard (Cox) model adjusting for possible confounders of survival. RESULTS Methylation of the promoter and loss of mRNA expression was found both in cell lines and primary tumors (43% and 51%, respectively). Using Cox modeling, a trend was found towards decreased hazard ratio (HR) for death in women with methylation of FBXW7/hCDC4-β in both cohorts (HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.23 to 1.23) and HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.23 to 1.08), respectively), despite an association between methylation and high-grade tumors (P = 0.017). Interestingly, in subgroups of patients whose tumors are p53 mutated or lymph-node positive, promoter methylation identified patients with significantly improved survival (P = 0.048 and P = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate an alternative mechanism for inactivation of the TSG FBXW7/hCDC4, namely promoter specific methylation. Importantly, in breast cancer, methylation of FBXW7/hCDC4-β is related to favorable prognosis despite its association with poorly differentiated tumors. Future work may define whether FBXW7/hCDC4 methylation is a biomarker of the response to chemotherapy and a target for epigenetic modulation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahab Akhoondi
- Departments of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Verma M. Pancreatic cancer biomarkers and their implication in cancer diagnosis and epidemiology. Cancers (Basel) 2010; 2:1830-7. [PMID: 24281203 PMCID: PMC3840448 DOI: 10.3390/cancers2041830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2010] [Accepted: 10/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Biomarkers are needed to detect this cancer early during the disease development and for screening populations to identify those who are at risk. In cancer, “biomarker” refers to a substance or process that is indicative of the presence of cancer in the body. A biomarker might be either a molecule secreted by a tumor or it can be a specific response of the body to the presence of cancer. Genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, glycomic, and imaging biomarkers can be used for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and epidemiology. A number of potential biomarkers have been identified for pancreatic cancer. These markers can be assayed in non-invasively collected biofluids. These biomarkers need analytical and clinical validation so that they can be used for the purpose of screening and diagnosing pancreatic cancer and determining disease prognosis. In this article, the latest developments in pancreatic cancer biomarkers are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukesh Verma
- Methods and Technologies Branch, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institues of Health (NIH), 6130 Executive Blvd., Suite 5100. Bethesda, MD 20892-7324, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang W, Yu M, Sun X, Woolley AT. Microdevices integrating affinity columns and capillary electrophoresis for multibiomarker analysis in human serum. LAB ON A CHIP 2010; 10:2527-33. [PMID: 20664867 PMCID: PMC2998056 DOI: 10.1039/c005288d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Biomarkers in human body fluids have great potential for use in screening for diseases such as cancer and diabetes, diagnosis, determining the effectiveness of treatments, and detecting recurrence. Present 96-well immunoassay technology effectively analyzes large numbers of samples; however, this approach is more expensive and less time effective on single or a few samples. In contrast, microfluidic systems are well suited for assaying small numbers of specimens in a point-of-care setting, provided suitable procedures are developed to work within peak capacity constraints when analyzing complex mixtures like human blood serum. Here, we developed integrated microdevices with an affinity column and capillary electrophoresis channels to isolate and quantitate a panel of proteins in complex matrices. To form an affinity column, a thin film of a reactive polymer was photopolymerized in a microchannel, and four antibodies were covalently immobilized to it. The retained protein amounts were consistent from chip to chip, demonstrating reproducibility. Furthermore, the signals from four fluorescently labeled proteins captured on-column were in the same range after rinsing, indicating the column has little bias toward any of the four antibodies or their antigens. These affinity columns have been integrated with capillary electrophoresis separation, enabling us to simultaneously quantify four protein biomarkers in human blood serum in the low ng mL(-1) range using either a calibration curve or standard addition. Our systems provide a fast, integrated and automated platform for multiple biomarker quantitation in complex media such as human blood serum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weichun Yang
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Ming Yu
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Xiuhua Sun
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Adam T. Woolley
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mishra A, Verma M. Cancer biomarkers: are we ready for the prime time? Cancers (Basel) 2010; 2:190-208. [PMID: 24281040 PMCID: PMC3827599 DOI: 10.3390/cancers2010190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2010] [Revised: 03/02/2010] [Accepted: 03/19/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. In cancer, a biomarker refers to a substance or process that is indicative of the presence of cancer in the body. A biomarker might be either a molecule secreted by a tumor or it can be a specific response of the body to the presence of cancer. Genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, glycomic, and imaging biomarkers can be used for cancer diagnosis, prognosis and epidemiology. These markers can be assayed in non-invasively collected biofluids. However, few cancer biomarkers are highly sensitive and specific for cancer detection at the present time. Consequently, biomarkers are not yet ready for routine use due to challenges in their clinical validation for early disease detection, diagnosis and monitoring to improve long-term survival of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alok Mishra
- Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology, Division of Molecular Oncology, Noida, 201301, UP, India; E-Mail:
| | - Mukesh Verma
- Methods and Technologies Branch, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institues of Health (NIH), 6130 Executive Blvd., Suite 5100, Bethesda, MD 20892-7324, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Cancer cells are characterized by epigenetic dysregulation, including global genome hypomethylation, regional hypo- and hypermethylation, histone modifications, and disturbed genomic imprinting. These alterations can be used as markers in cancer epidemiology to assess risk as well as follow-up of the disease. Some of the methylation markers can be assayed on microarray chips on which a very small amount of sample is needed, and the assays are robust and the markers have high specificity and sensitivity. Implication of epigenetic markers in cancer detection, diagnosis, prognosis, control, and cancer epidemiology is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Kumar
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|