Quantal Nature of Generalization and Acquisition Responding by Rats in a Drug Discrimination Task

Attenuation of the amphetamine discriminative cue in rats with the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine

Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate between saline and amphetamine injections (1.0 mg/kg ip) using a standard two-lever (FR10) drug discrimination paradigm. A baseline dose-effect curve was generated for amphetamine administration alone, using doses both above and below the training dose (0.0-2.2 mg/kg ip). Once completed, a single dose of olanzapine (OLZ; 1.5 mg/kg sc) was tested for its ability to attenuate the amphetamine cue. OLZ pretreatment (60 min) successfully interfered with an animal's ability to discriminate amphetamine injections across various doses. The percentage of correct responding on the amphetamine lever and rate of responding were both significantly decreased across some but not all of the amphetamine doses. Therefore, we believe that this preliminary investigation has successfully shown that an OLZ dose of 1.5 mg/kg sc at 60 min can interfere with an animal's ability to detect some subjective cue(s) associated with amphetamine administration.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the 5HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT: attenuation by mu but not by kappa opioids

The ability of mu and kappa opioids to alter the discriminative-stimulus and rate-decreasing effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT was examined in rats trained to discriminate either a low (0.1 mg/kg) or a high (0.3 mg/kg) dose of 8-OH-DPAT from water using a two-lever food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. The mu opioids, morphine and fentanyl, and the kappa opioids, U50,488 and bremazocine, failed to substitute for the 8-OH-DPAT stimulus, even when tested up to doses that substantially reduced rates of responding. During antagonism tests, selected doses of the mu opioids, morphine and fentanyl, administered at various pretreatment times, attenuated the stimulus effects of both training doses of 8-OH-DPAT. Moreover, morphine (135-min pretreat) and fentanyl (15-min pretreat) produced rightward shifts in the 8-OH-DPAT dose-effect curve that were partially surmountable and naltrexone-reversible. In contrast to the effects of the mu opioids, the kappa opioids, U50,488 and bremazocine, failed to alter the stimulus effects of the training dose of 8-OH-DPAT, regardless of dose or pretreatment time. The rate-decreasing effects of 8-OH-DPAT were not altered substantially by either the mu or kappa opioids examined. The present study demonstrates that the stimulus effects, but not the rate-decreasing effects, of 5-HT1A receptor agonists can be modulated by mu opioids, whereas neither of these effects are changed by kappa opioids.

Discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and diazepam in humans

Eight male community volunteers, who reported current psychomotor stimulant use, were trained to discriminate between the presence and absence of orally administered d-amphetamine 30 mg. During daily experimental sessions, in which a single drug dose or placebo was tested, physiological and subjective measures were assessed and subjects indicated their discrimination by responding on an operant color-tracking procedure. During four test of acquisition sessions, discriminative responding indicated that all subjects learned the discrimination, and d-amphetamine produced physiological and subjective effects typical of psychomotor stimulants. Generalization testing then followed in which dose-response curves were determined for the following drugs: d-amphetamine (3.75, 7.5, 15 and 30 mg), diazepam (5, 10, 20 and 40 mg), and methylphenidate (7.5, 15, 30 and 60 mg). d-Amphetamine and methylphenidate produced dose-related increases in d-amphetamine-appropriate responding, whereas no dose of diazepam substituted for d-amphetamine in any subject. d-Amphetamine and methylphenidate produced a similar pattern of subjective changes, including increased ratings of euphoria and drug liking and decreased sedation. In contrast, diazepam increased subjective scales of sedation and dysphoria. These results are consistent with similar studies testing animals and humans and demonstrate the utility of human drug discrimination research as an integral component of drug abuse liability testing.

Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response

In drug discrimination research, detection of drug stimuli by animals is used for investigating various properties of psychoactive drugs. The major issue addressed by this paper is whether detection of drug stimuli by animals is a quantal or graded event. Some data suggest that detection of a drug stimulus by animals is quantal in nature. Thus, variations in drug stimulus substitution may only reflect variations in threshold for detecting the training stimulus rather than the current concept of these data reflecting graded responding to stimulus intensity. Therefore, drug discrimination procedures may have limited utility for detecting quantitative differences in the subjective effects of varying drug doses. In order to examine this problem, a method for measuring continuous response gradients in individual animals is needed. Tests for quantal responding generally use the distribution of responses on two manipulanda as the dependent measure. However, this variable may be inadequate for detecting a graded response, and may actually reflect loss of stimulus control or a deterioration in performance, rather than changes in response magnitude. Most alternative measures utilize response rate. Unfortunately, these measures are influenced by the direct rate-altering properties of some drugs. One possible alternative method is conditioned taste aversion as the discriminative task. This paradigm provides a means for not only ascertaining if graded discriminative responses occur in individual animals, but also more rapidly training a drug discrimination. Thus, using conditioned taste aversion techniques for measuring a drug discrimination may provide better indices for detecting response gradations.