Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients

Impact of Diabetes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Within 48 Hours

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients with coronary artery disease may benefit from elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unknown whether this merit is transferable to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing surgery.

METHOD

A total of 1,427 patients underwent CABG within 48 hours of being diagnosed with AMI at the current institution between 2001 and 2019. Of these patients, 206 (14.4%) had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 148 (10.4%) had non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Retrospective data analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Patients with NIDDM showed the highest perioperative risk profile, with a EuroScore II of 11.6 (±10.3) compared with 7.8 (±8.0) in non-diabetic patients and 8.4 (±7.8) in patients with IDDM (p<0.001). Sub-analysis demonstrated a higher proportion of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in the NIDDM cohort compared with the IDDM cohort (70.9% vs 56.8%; p=0.005). Postoperatively, NIDDM patients had more sepsis (p<0.01) and longer ventilation times (p<0.001) compared with non-DM and IDDM patients (p<0.01). Wound healing complications were rare, but almost twice as high in NIDDM patients compared with non-DM and IDDM patients (4.7% vs 0.9% vs 2.4%, respectively). The 30-day mortality was highest in the NIDDM cohort (18.3% vs 11.3% vs 7.8%; p=0.012). Analysis of survival for up to 15 years revealed a significantly reduced survival of diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic patients, with lowest survival rates in NIDDM patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus patients undergoing CABG within 48 hours of being diagnosed with AMI are at increased risk of short-term and long-term complications. Therefore, this particular group should undergo a careful evaluation concerning the expected risks and benefits of CABG in this setting.

Risk factors of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become one of the effective methods for the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, it is easy to have in-stent restenosis (ISR), even cardiovascular events after PCI, which affects the therapeutic effects. The incidence of ISR in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients increased by 2 to 4 times. Early identification of the risk factors of ISR in DM patients after PCI may help clinical staff to prevent and intervene as soon as possible, so it is very important to improve the clinical outcomes of DM patients. Although scholars at home and abroad have studied and summarized the risk factors of ISR in DM patients after PCI, the conclusions are different. Therefore, in this study, meta-analysis was used to summarize the risk factors of ISR in DM patients after PCI, and to explore the characteristics of high-risk groups of ISR, thus providing reference for early identification and prevention of ISR.

METHODS

We will search related literature from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang Database. Eligible studies will be screened based on inclusion criteria. Meanwhile, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, publication bias assessment, subgroup analysis, and quality assessment will be performed. Review Manager Version 5.3 software will be applied for data analysis. Each process is independently conducted by 2 researchers. If there is any objection, it will be submitted to a third researcher for resolution.

RESULTS

We will disseminate the findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis via publications in peer-reviewed journals.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this analysis can be used to generate a risk prediction model and provide an intervention strategy for the occurrence of ISR in DM patients after PCI.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/WC87Y.

Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes

BACKGROUND

In some randomized trials comparing revascularization strategies for patients with diabetes, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has had a better outcome than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to discover whether aggressive medical therapy and the use of drug-eluting stents could alter the revascularization approach for patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, we assigned patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo either PCI with drug-eluting stents or CABG. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (median among survivors, 3.8 years). All patients were prescribed currently recommended medical therapies for the control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and glycated hemoglobin. The primary outcome measure was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.

RESULTS

From 2005 through 2010, we enrolled 1900 patients at 140 international centers. The patients' mean age was 63.1±9.1 years, 29% were women, and 83% had three-vessel disease. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the PCI group (P=0.005), with 5-year rates of 26.6% in the PCI group and 18.7% in the CABG group. The benefit of CABG was driven by differences in rates of both myocardial infarction (P<0.001) and death from any cause (P=0.049). Stroke was more frequent in the CABG group, with 5-year rates of 2.4% in the PCI group and 5.2% in the CABG group (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with diabetes and advanced coronary artery disease, CABG was superior to PCI in that it significantly reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction, with a higher rate of stroke. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; FREEDOM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00086450.).