1
|
Chirilă ME, Kraja F, Marta GN, Neves Junior WFP, de Arruda GV, Gouveia AG, Franco P, Poortmans P, Ratosa I. Organ-sparing techniques and dose-volume constrains used in breast cancer radiation therapy - Results from European and Latin American surveys. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100752. [PMID: 38425691 PMCID: PMC10900109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in local and systemic therapies have improved the outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC), leading to a possible increased risk for postoperative radiation therapy (RT) late adverse events. The most adequate technologies and dose constraints for organs at risk (OAR) in BC RT have yet to be defined. Methods An online survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) practicing in Europe and Latin America including the Caribbean (LAC) through personal contacts, RO and BC professional groups' networks. Demographic data and clinical practice information were collected. Results The study included 585 responses from ROs practicing in 57 different countries. The most frequently contoured OAR by European and LAC participants were the whole heart (96.6 % and 97.7 %), the ipsilateral (84.3 % and 90.8 %), and contralateral lung (71.3 % and 77.4 %), whole lung (69.8 % and 72.9 %), and the contralateral breast (66.4 % and. 83.2 %). ESTRO guidelines were preferred in Europe (33.3 %) and the RTOG contouring guideline was the most popular in LAC (62.2 %), while some participants used both recommendations (13.2 % and 19.2 %). IMRT (68.6 % and 59.1 %) and VMAT (65.6 % and 60.2 %) were the preferred modalities used in heart sparing strategies, followed by deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) (54.8 % and 37.4 %) and partial breast irradiation (PBI) (41.6 % and 24.6 %). Only a small percentage of all ROs reported the dose-volume constraints for OAR used in routine clinical practice. A mean heart dose (Heart-Dmean) between 4 and 5 Gy was the most frequently reported parameter (17.2 % and 39.3 %). Conclusion The delineation approaches and sparing techniques for OAR in BC RT vary between ROs worldwide. The low response rate to the dose constraints subset of queries reflects the uncertainty surrounding this topic and supports the need for detailed consensus recommendations in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica-Emila Chirilă
- Radiation Oncology Department, Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Clinical Development, MVision AI, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Fatjona Kraja
- Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine Tirana, Albania
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Mother Teresa, Tirana, Albania
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Post-Graduation Program, Radiology and Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Wellington Furtado Pimenta Neves Junior
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Post-Graduation Program, Radiology and Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Viani de Arruda
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - André Guimarães Gouveia
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Sciences (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buschmann M, Kauer-Dorner D, Konrad S, Georg D, Widder J, Knäusl B. Stereoscopic X-ray image and thermo-optical surface guidance for breast cancer radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath-hold. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:306-313. [PMID: 37796341 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02153-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of a thermo-optical surface imaging (SGRT) system combined with room-based stereoscopic X‑ray image guidance (IGRT) in a dedicated breast deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) irradiation workflow. In this context, benchmarking of portal imaging (EPID) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) against stereoscopic X‑rays was performed. METHODS SGRT + IGRT data of 30 left-sided DIBH breast patients (1 patient with bilateral cancer) treated in 351 fractions using thermo-optical surface imaging and X-ray IGRT were retrospectively analysed. Patients were prepositioned based on a free-breathing surface reference derived from a CT scan. Once the DIBH was reached using visual feedback, two stereoscopic X‑ray images were acquired and registered to the digitally reconstructed radiographs derived from the DIBH CT. Based on this registration, a couch correction was performed. Positioning and monitoring by surface and X-ray imaging were verified by protocol-based EPID or CBCT imaging at selected fractions and the calculation of residual geometric deviations. RESULTS The median X‑ray-derived couch correction vector was 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.3-7.1) mm long. Verification imaging was performed for 134 fractions (216 RT field verifications) with EPID and for 37 fractions with CBCT, respectively. The median 2D/3D deviation vector length over all verification images was 2.5 (IQR 1.6-3.9) mm/3.4 (IQR 2.2-4.8) mm for EPID/CBCT, both being well within the planning target volume (PTV) margins (7 mm). A moderate correlation (0.49-0.65) was observed between the surface signal and X-ray position in DIBH. CONCLUSION DIBH treatments using thermo-optical SGRT and X-ray IGRT were feasible for breast cancer patients. Stereoscopic X‑ray positioning was successfully verified by standard IGRT techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Buschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Daniela Kauer-Dorner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Stefan Konrad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding Z, Kang K, Yuan Q, Zhang W, Sang Y. A Beam Angle Selection Method to Improve Plan Robustness Against Position Error in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241259633. [PMID: 38887092 PMCID: PMC11185013 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241259633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report a dosimetric study in whole breast irradiation (WBI) of plan robustness evaluation against position error with two radiation techniques: tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy (T-IMRT) and multi-angle IMRT (M-IMRT). METHODS Ten left-sided patients underwent WBI were selected. The dosimetric characteristics, biological evaluation and plan robustness were evaluated. The plan robustness quantification was performed by calculating the dose differences (Δ) of the original plan and perturbed plans, which were recalculated by introducing a 3-, 5-, and 10-mm shift in 18 directions. RESULTS M-IMRT showed better sparing of high-dose volume of organs at risk (OARs), but performed a larger low-dose irradiation volume of normal tissue. The greater shift worsened plan robustness. For a 10-mm perturbation, greater dose differences were observed in T-IMRT plans in nearly all directions, with higher ΔD98%, ΔD95%, and ΔDmean of CTV Boost and CTV. A 10-mm shift in inferior (I) direction induced CTV Boost in T-IMRT plans a 1.1 (ΔD98%), 1.1 (ΔD95%), and 1.7 (ΔDmean) times dose differences greater than dose differences in M-IMRT plans. For CTV Boost, shifts in the right (R) and I directions generated greater dose differences in T-IMRT plans, while shifts in left (L) and superior (S) directions generated larger dose differences in M-IMRT plans. For CTV, T-IMRT plans showed higher sensitivity to a shift in the R direction. M-IMRT plans showed higher sensitivity to shifts in L, S, and I directions. For OARs, negligible dose differences were found in V20 of the lungs and heart. Greater ΔDmax of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was seen in M-IMRT plans. CONCLUSION We proposed a plan robustness evaluation method to determine the beam angle against position uncertainty accompanied by optimal dose distribution and OAR sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Kailian Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Qingqing Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wenjue Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Sang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cilla S, Deodato F, Romano C, Macchia G, Buwenge M, Boccardi M, Pezzulla D, Pierro A, Zamagni A, Morganti AG. Risk evaluation of secondary malignancies after radiotherapy of breast cancer in light of the continuous development of planning techniques. Med Dosim 2023; 48:279-285. [PMID: 37659968 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
Secondary cancer risk is a significant concern for women treated with breast radiation therapy due to improved long-term survival rates. We evaluated the potential of new advanced automated planning algorithms together with hybrid techniques to minimize the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for early staged breast cancer. Using CT data set of 25 patients, we generated 4 different radiation treatment plans of different complexity, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), field-in-field (FinF), hybrid-IMRT (HMRT) and automated hybrid-VMAT (HVMAT) techniques. The organ-equivalent dose (OED) was calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the "linear-exponential," "plateau," and "full mechanistic" dose-response models and was used to evaluate the EAR for secondary cancer in the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL). Statistical comparisons of data were performed by a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. The planning objectives were fulfilled with all the planning techniques for both target coverage and organs-at-risk sparing. The differences in EAR for CB, CL and IL secondary tumor induction were not significant among the 4 techniques. For the CB and CL, the mean absolute difference did not reach 1 case of 10000 patient-years. For the IL, the mean absolute difference was up to 5 cases of 10,000 patient-years. In conclusion, the automated HVMAT technique allows an EAR reduction at the level of well-consolidated tangential 3D-CRT or FinF techniques, keeping all the HVMAT dosimetric improvements unchanged. On the basis of this analysis, the adoption of the HVMAT technique poses no increase in EAR and could be considered safe also for younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy; Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Antonio Pierro
- Radiology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Y, Zhan W, Jia Y, Xiong H, Lin B, Li Q, Liu H, Qiu L, Zhang Y, Ding J, Fu C, Chen W. Application of tangent-arc technology for deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1145332. [PMID: 37795446 PMCID: PMC10547143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1145332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the advantages of dosimetry and the treatment efficiency of tangent-arc technology in deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for breast cancer. Methods Forty patients with left-sided breast cancer who were treated in our hospital from May 2020 to June 2021 were randomly selected and divided into two groups. The first group's plan was a continuous semi-arc that started at 145° ( ± 5°) and stopped at 325° ( ± 5°). The other group's plan, defined as the tangent-arc plan, had two arcs: the first arc started at 145° ( ± 5°) and stopped at 85° ( ± 5°), and the second arc started at 25° ( ± 5°) and stopped at 325° ( ± 5°). We compared the target dose, dose in organs at risk (OARs), and treatment time between the two groups. Results The target dose was similar between the continuous semiarc and tangent-arc groups. The V5 of the right lung was significantly different between the two groups (Dif 5.52, 95% confidence interval 1.92-9.13, t=3.10, P=0.004), with the patients in the continuous semi-arc and tangent-arc groups having lung V5 values of (9.16 ± 1.62)%, and (3.64 ± 0.73)%, respectively. The maximum dose to the spinal cord was (1835.88 ± 222.17) cGy in the continuous semi-arc group and (599.42 ± 153.91) cGy in the tangent-arc group, yielding a significant difference between the two groups (Dif 1236.46, 95% confidence interval 689.32-1783.6, t=4.57, P<0.001). The treatment times was (311.70 ± 60.45) s for patients in the continuous semi-arc group and (254.66 ± 40.73) s for patients in the tangent-arc group, and there was a significant difference in the mean number of treatment times between the two groups (Dif 57.04, 95% confidence interval 24.05-90.03, t=3.5, P=0.001). Conclusion Both the continuous semi-arc and tangent-arc plans met the clinical prescription dose requirements. The OARs received less radiation with the tangent-arc plan than the continuous semi-arc plan, especially for the lung (measured as V5) and the spinal cord (measured as the maximum dose). Tangent-arc plan took significantly less time than the continuous semi-arc, which can greatly improve treatment efficiency. Therefore, tangent-arc plans are superior continuous semi-arc plans for all cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yucheng Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wenming Zhan
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yongshi Jia
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hanchu Xiong
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Baihua Lin
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huaxin Liu
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lingyun Qiu
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yinghao Zhang
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jieni Ding
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chao Fu
- Department of Tumor Radiochemotherapy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weijun Chen
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lu Y, Ma Y, Yang D, Li Y, Yuan W, Tang F, Xu L, Zhou L, Lin H, Li B, Chen R, He C, Zhao D. Cardiorespiratory dose comparison among six radiotherapy regimens for patients with left-sided breast cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:13339. [PMID: 37587214 PMCID: PMC10432504 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40577-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
There is uncertainty regarding the benefits and drawbacks of various radiation protocols for the treatment of left-sided breast cancer. To address this issue, we conducted a Bayesian network analysis. First, we searched several electronic databases for eligible literature. Next, we pooled the data from twelve studies concerning three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), combined with either deep inspiratory breath-holding (DIBH) or free-breathing (FB) modalities. The integrated cardiac and pulmonary dosimetric indexes for all included treatments were compared using Bayesian networks. A direct meta-analysis indicated that for the two methods of 3D-CRT and IMRT, DIBH technology was more effective than FB in reducing the radiation dose to the heart and lungs. Additionally, according to the network results, DIBH was superior to FB in all six treatment options, regardless of whether the plan was 3D-CRT, IMRT, or VMAT. Besides, the combined data indicated that the FB-3D-CRT regimen had the weakest dosimetric advantage of all the treatments. Excluding FB-3D-CRT, each of the other five treatments had its own specific benefits. This is the first Bayesian study of several radiotherapy regimens for breast cancer patients on the left side, and the findings can be used to select appropriate radiotherapy programs for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongkai Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Yanfang Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Di Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China
| | - Yi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wei Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Fengwen Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Lei Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Luping Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hao Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Binglin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Ruijuan Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, China.
| | - Chenchen He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Dongli Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eber J, Schmitt M, Dehaynin N, Le Fèvre C, Antoni D, Noël G. Evaluation of Cardiac Substructures Exposure of DIBH-3DCRT, FB-HT, and FB-3DCRT in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery: An In Silico Planning Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3406. [PMID: 37444516 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy can lead to late cardiovascular complications, including ischemic events. To mitigate these risks, cardiac-sparing techniques such as deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have been developed. However, recent studies have shown that mean heart dose is not a sufficient dosimetric parameter for assessing cardiac exposure. In this study, we aimed to compare the radiation exposure to cardiac substructures for ten patients who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy using DIBH three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), free-breathing (FB)-3DCRT, and FB helical tomotherapy (HT). Dosimetric parameters of cardiac substructures were analyzed, and the results were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. This study found a significant reduction in the dose to the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, and ventricles with DIBH-3DCRT and FB-HT compared to FB-3DCRT. While DIBH-3DCRT was very effective in sparing the heart, in some cases, it provided little or no cardiac sparing. FB-HT can be an interesting treatment modality to reduce the dose to major coronary vessels and ventricles and may be of interest for patients with cardiovascular risks who do not benefit from or cannot perform DIBH. These findings highlight the importance of cardiac-sparing techniques for precise delivery of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Eber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - Martin Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Dehaynin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - Clara Le Fèvre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France
- Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg University, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, UNICANCER, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baseline cardiac risk profile determines radiation-induced cardiac toxicity in patients with mid-lower esophageal cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2023. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039692200036x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
The radiotherapy techniques are evolving. Besides optimal tumour coverage, considering organs at risk (OAR) is pertinent to radiation oncologists. In mid-lower esophageal cancer (MLEC) radiotherapy, heart is the main OAR. Studies on excess absolute risk (EAR) of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in MLEC radiotherapy are limited in the main literature. Therefore, this study was conducted to estimate the EAR of CVD in patients with MLEC treated with the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique.
Results:
Family history of heart disease and smoking increased the EAR of CVD significantly compared to the cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The 10-year EAR of the high-risk group was more than four times of the low-risk group at all ages. In the low-risk group, EAR of CVD after radiotherapy of esophageal cancer can increase by up to 9·1%, while in the high-risk group, EAR increased by 34·89%.
Conclusions:
Adding the baseline CVD risk factors improved the estimation of EAR of heart disease after MLEC radiotherapy with the IMRT technique.
Collapse
|
9
|
Racka I, Majewska K, Winiecki J. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer patients-comparative analysis of dose distribution and estimation of projected secondary cancer risk. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:90-101. [PMID: 35943553 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01979-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim of the study was estimation of the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for both radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 25 patients who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), three treatment plans were generated: one using a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and two using volumetric modulated arc therapy. First VMAT-DIBH geometry consisted of three partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 3A) and second consisted of four partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 4A). Cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], ipsilateral and contralateral lung [IL, CL], and contralateral breast [CB]). Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) and organ equivalent doses (OEDs) were calculated using the differential DVHs. Excess absolute risks (EARs) for second cancers were estimated using Schneider's full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS All plans fulfilled the criterium for PTV V95% ≥ 95%. The PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformity indices were significantly better for VMAT-DIBH. VMAT showed a significantly increased mean dose and V5Gy for all OARs, but reduced LAD Dmax by 15 Gy. For IL, CL, and CB, the 3D-CRT DIBH method achieved the lowest values of EAR: 28.38 per 10,000 PYs, 2.55 per 10,000 PYs, and 4.48 per 10,000 PYs (p < 0.001), compared to 40.29 per 10,000 PYs, 15.62 per 10,000 PYs, and 23.44 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 3A plans and 41.12 per 10,000 PYs, 15.59 per 10,000 PYs, and 22.73 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 4A plans. Both techniques provided negligibly low NTCPs for all OARs. CONCLUSION The study shows that VMAT-DIBH provides better OAR sparing against high doses. However, the large low-dose-bath (≤ 5 Gy) is still a concern due to the fact that a larger volume of normal tissues exposed to lower doses may increase a radiation-induced risk of secondary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iga Racka
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Karolina Majewska
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Janusz Winiecki
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Clinic of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicholas Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karaca S. The use of Hybrid Techniques in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221143937. [PMID: 36537067 PMCID: PMC9772967 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221143937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The development of new techniques in radiotherapy (RT) provides a better planned target volume (PTV) dose distribution while further improving the protection of organs at risk (OARs). The study aims to present the dosimetric results of studies using hybrid techniques in whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT). Methods: This systematic literature review was conducted by scanning the relevant literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Among the parameters are dose values for PTV and OARs beam contribute ratios, the value of monitors, and treatment times for different RT techniques. Initially, 586 articles were identified; 196 duplicate articles were removed leaving 391 articles for screening. Three-hundred and thirty-seven irrelevant articles were excluded, leaving 54 studies assessed for eligibility. A total of 22 articles met the search criteria to evaluate dosimetric results of hybrid and other RT techniques in WBRT. Results: According to the dosimetric data of the studies, hybrid intensity-modulated RT (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) techniques give dosimetrically advantageous results in WBRT compared to other RT techniques. Conclusion: Hybrid techniques using appropriate beams contribute value and show great promise in improving dosimetric results in WBRT. However, there is a need for new studies showing the long-term clinical results of hybrid RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Karaca
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey,Sibel Karaca, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07070, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pazzaglia S, Eidemüller M, Lumniczky K, Mancuso M, Ramadan R, Stolarczyk L, Moertl S. Out-of-field effects: lessons learned from partial body exposure. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2022; 61:485-504. [PMID: 36001144 PMCID: PMC9722818 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-00988-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Partial body exposure and inhomogeneous dose delivery are features of the majority of medical and occupational exposure situations. However, mounting evidence indicates that the effects of partial body exposure are not limited to the irradiated area but also have systemic effects that are propagated outside the irradiated field. It was the aim of the "Partial body exposure" session within the MELODI workshop 2020 to discuss recent developments and insights into this field by covering clinical, epidemiological, dosimetric as well as mechanistic aspects. Especially the impact of out-of-field effects on dysfunctions of immune cells, cardiovascular diseases and effects on the brain were debated. The presentations at the workshop acknowledged the relevance of out-of-field effects as components of the cellular and organismal radiation response. Furthermore, their importance for the understanding of radiation-induced pathologies, for the discovery of early disease biomarkers and for the identification of high-risk organs after inhomogeneous exposure was emphasized. With the rapid advancement of clinical treatment modalities, including new dose rates and distributions a better understanding of individual health risk is urgently needed. To achieve this, a deeper mechanistic understanding of out-of-field effects in close connection to improved modelling was suggested as priorities for future research. This will support the amelioration of risk models and the personalization of risk assessments for cancer and non-cancer effects after partial body irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Pazzaglia
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, ENEA CR-Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - M. Eidemüller
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - K. Lumniczky
- Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, National Public Health Centre, Albert Florian u. 2-6, 1097 Budapest, Hungary
| | - M. Mancuso
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, ENEA CR-Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - R. Ramadan
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - L. Stolarczyk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - S. Moertl
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vogel M, Gade J, Timm B, Schürmann M, Auerbach H, Nüsken F, Rübe C, Melchior P, Dzierma Y. Comparison of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Techniques Regarding Secondary Cancer Risk and Normal Tissue Complication Probability - Modelling and Measurements Using a 3D-Printed Phantom. Front Oncol 2022; 12:892923. [PMID: 35965556 PMCID: PMC9365503 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy after breast-conserving therapy is a standard postoperative treatment of breast cancer, which can be carried out with a variety of irradiation techniques. The treatment planning must take into consideration detrimental effects on the neighbouring organs at risk-the lung, the heart, and the contralateral breast, which can include both short- and long-term effects represented by the normal tissue complication probability and secondary cancer risk. Patients and Methods In this planning study, we investigate intensity-modulated (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) radiotherapy techniques including sequential or simultaneously integrated boosts as well as interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy boost techniques of 38 patients with breast-conserving surgery retrospectively. We furthermore develop a 3D-printed breast phantom add-on to allow for catheter placement and to measure the out-of-field dose using thermoluminescent dosimeters placed inside an anthropomorphic phantom. Finally, we estimate normal tissue complication probabilities using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model and secondary cancer risks using the linear non-threshold model (out-of-field) and the model by Schneider et al. (in-field). Results The results depend on the combination of primary whole-breast irradiation and boost technique. The normal tissue complication probabilities for various endpoints are of the following order: 1%-2% (symptomatic pneumonitis, ipsilateral lung), 2%-3% (symptomatic pneumonitis, whole lung), and 1%-2% (radiation pneumonitis grade ≥ 2, whole lung). The additional relative risk of ischemic heart disease ranges from +25% to +35%. In-field secondary cancer risk of the ipsilateral lung in left-sided treatment is around 50 per 10,000 person-years for 20 years after exposure at age 55. Out-of-field estimation of secondary cancer risk results in approximately 5 per 10,000 person-years each for the contralateral lung and breast. Conclusions In general, 3D-CRT shows the best risk reduction in contrast to IMRT. Regarding the boost concepts, brachytherapy is the most effective method in order to minimise normal tissue complication probability and secondary cancer risk compared to teletherapy boost concepts. Hence, the 3D-CRT technique in combination with an interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy boost is most suitable in terms of risk avoidance for treating breast cancer with techniques including boost concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Vogel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Gade
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Timm
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Technical Service, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michaela Schürmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Auerbach
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Frank Nüsken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Rübe
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Melchior
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Yvonne Dzierma
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A Critical Overview of Predictors of Heart Sparing by Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold Irradiation in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143477. [PMID: 35884538 PMCID: PMC9319386 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Adjuvant radiotherapy could damage the heart in left-sided breast cancer patients. The deep-inspiration-breath-hold technique may limit the heart exposure to radiation. As non-beneficiaries exist, there is some need to do an upfront cost-effective selection. Some easy-to-use anatomical predictors may help insiders in the treatment decision. The awareness of such findings may improve the efficiency of practitioners’ workflows. Abstract Radiotherapy represents an essential part of the therapeutic algorithm for breast cancer patients after conservative surgery. The treatment of left-sided tumors has been associated with a non-negligible risk of developing late-onset cardiovascular disease. The cardiac risk perception has especially increased over the last years due to the prolongation of patients’ survival owing to the advent of new drugs and an ever earlier cancer detection through screening programs. Improvements in radiation delivery techniques could reduce the treatment-related heart toxicity. The deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) irradiation is one of the most advanced treatment approaches, which requires specific technical equipment and uses inspiration to displace the heart from the tangential radiation fields. However, not all patients benefit from its use. Moreover, DIBH irradiation needs patient compliance and accurate training. Therefore, such a technique may be unjustifiably cumbersome and time-consuming as well as unnecessarily expensive from a mere healthcare cost point of view. Hence the need to early select only the true beneficiaries while tailoring more effective heart-sparing techniques for the others and streamlining the workflow, especially in high-volume radiation oncology departments. In this literature overview, we collected some possible predictors of cardiac dose sparing in DIBH irradiation for left breast treatment in an effort to provide an easy-to-consult summary of simple instruments to insiders for identifying patients actually benefitting from this technique. We critically reviewed the reliability and weaknesses of each retrieved finding, aiming to inspire new insights and discussions on this much-debated topic.
Collapse
|
14
|
Schröder C, Kirschke S, Blank E, Rohrberg S, Förster R, Buchali A. Deep inspiration breath-hold for patients with left-sided breast cancer - A one-fits-all approach? A prospective analysis of patient selection using dosimetrical and practical aspects. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210295. [PMID: 34111954 PMCID: PMC10996328 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To prospectively analyze the feasibility of an algorithm for patient preparation, treatment planning, and selection for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment of left-sided breast cancer. METHODS From February 2017 to July 2019, 135 patients with left-sided breast cancer were selected and prepared for radiotherapy in DIBH. 99 received radiotherapy for the breast alone and 36 for the breast including the lymphatic drainage (RNI). Treatment plans DIBH and free breathing (FB) were calculated. Dosimetrical analyses were performed, and criteria were defined to assess whether a patient would dosimetrically profit from DIBH. RESULTS Of the 135 patients, 97 received a DIBH planning CT and 72 were selected for treatment in DIBH according to predefined criteria. When using DIBH, there was a mean reduction of the DmeanHeart of 2.8 Gy and DmeanLAD of 4.2 Gy. seven patients did not benefit from DIBH regarding DmeanHeart, 23 regarding DmeanLAD. For the left lung, the V20Gy was reduced by 4.9%, the V30Gy by 2.7% with 15 and 29 patients not benefiting from DIBH, respectively. In the 25 patients treated in FB, the benefit of DIBH would have been lower than for patients treated with DIBH (ΔDmeanHeart0.7 Gy vs 3.4 Gy). CONCLUSION Dosimetrically, DIBH is no "one-fits-all" approach. However, there is a statistically significant benefit when looking at a larger patient population. DIBH should be used for treatment of left-sided breast cancer in patients fit for DIBH. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This analysis offers a well-designed dosimetrical analysis in patients treated with DIBH radiotherapy in an "every day" cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schröder
- Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner
Kliniken GmbH, University Hospital of the Medizinische Hochschule
Theodor Fontane Brandenburg,
Neuruppin, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur
(KSW), Brauerstrasse 15, 8401
Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Kirschke
- Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner
Kliniken GmbH, University Hospital of the Medizinische Hochschule
Theodor Fontane Brandenburg,
Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Eyck Blank
- Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner
Kliniken GmbH, University Hospital of the Medizinische Hochschule
Theodor Fontane Brandenburg,
Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Sophia Rohrberg
- Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner
Kliniken GmbH, University Hospital of the Medizinische Hochschule
Theodor Fontane Brandenburg,
Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur
(KSW), Brauerstrasse 15, 8401
Winterthur, Switzerland
- Medical Faculty, University of Zurich (UZH), Pestalozzistrasse
3/5, 8091 Zurich,
Switzerland
| | - André Buchali
- Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner
Kliniken GmbH, University Hospital of the Medizinische Hochschule
Theodor Fontane Brandenburg,
Neuruppin, Germany
- Medizinische Hochschule Theodor Fontane
Brandenburg, Neuruppin,
Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bi S, Zhu R, Dai Z. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early stage right side breast cancer between three techniques: IMRT, hybrid IMRT and hybrid VMAT. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:60. [PMID: 35346264 PMCID: PMC8962055 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02009-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed at evaluating the clinical impact of full intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), hybrid IMRT (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for early-stage breast cancer with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), in terms of plan quality and second cancer risk (SCR). Methods Three different plans were designed in full IMRT, hybrid IMRT, and hybrid VMAT for each of twenty patients with early-stage breast cancer. Target quality, organs at risk (OARs) sparing, and SCR were compared among the three plans for each case. Results In compared with H-IMRT, IMRT plans showed deterioration in terms of D2% of SIB, V10 of ipsilateral lung, and excess absolute risk (EAR) to contralateral lung (C-Lung) and esophagus. D2% and the homogeneity index (HI) of SIB, V5 of ipsilateral lung (I-Lung), the Dmean of the esophagus, the EAR to C-Lung and the esophagus with hybrid VMAT dramatically increased by 0.63%, 10%, 17.99%, 149.27%, 230.41%, and 135.29%, respectively (p = 0.024; 0.025; 0.046; 0.011; 0.000; 0.014). Dmean of the heart, the EAR to contralateral breast (C-Breast) and C-Lung by full IMRT was significantly decreased in comparison to the H-VMAT (4.67%, p = 0.033, 26.76%, p = 0.018; 48.05%, p = 0.036). Conclusion The results confirmed that H-IMRT could achieve better target quality and OARs sparing than IMRT and H-VMAT for SIB radiotherapy of early-stage right breast cancer. H-IMRT was the best treatment option, while H-VMAT performed the worst among the three plans in terms of SCR to peripheral OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyan Bi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Rui Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Yunyang County People's Hospital, Chongqing, 404500, China
| | - Zhitao Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ding Z, Zeng Q, Kang K, Xu M, Xiang X, Liu C. Evaluation of Plan Robustness Using Hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Arc Modulation Radiotherapy (VMAT) for Left-Sided Breast Cancer. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9040131. [PMID: 35447691 PMCID: PMC9028731 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9040131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to evaluate the robustness of multi-field IMRT and VMAT plans to target motion for left-sided BC radiotherapy. Methods: The 7-field hybrid IMRT (7F-H-IMRT) and 2-arc VMAT (2A-VMAT) plans were generated for ten left-sided BC patients. Shifts of 3 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm in six directions were introduced and the perturbed dose distributions were recalculated. The dose differences (∆D) of the original plan and perturbed plan corresponded to the plan robustness for the structure. Results: Higher ∆D98%, ∆D95%, and ∆Dmean of CTV were observed in 2A-VMAT plans, which induced higher tumor control probability reductions. A higher ∆Dmean of CTV Boost was found in 7F-H-IMRT plans despite lower ∆D98% and ∆D95%. Shifts in the S-I direction exerted the largest effect on CTV and CTV Boost. Regarding OARs, shifts in R, P, and I directions contributed to increasing the received dose. The 2A-VMAT plans performed better dose sparing, but had a higher robustness in a high-dose volume of the left lung and heart. The 2A-VMAT plans decreased the max dose of LAD but exhibited lower robustness. Conclusion: The 2A-VMAT plans showed higher sensitivity to position deviation. Shifts in the S-I direction exerted the largest effect for CTV and CTV Boost.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kowalchuk RO, Corbin KS, Jimenez RB. Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041066. [PMID: 35205814 PMCID: PMC8870138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Kimberly S. Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Rachel B. Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ertan F, Sahin S, Azak C, Karakaya E, Altundag MB, Goksel F. Evaluation of the voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold reproducibility in left-sided breast radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 30:1057-1066. [PMID: 36155488 DOI: 10.3233/xst-221228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (v-DIBH) reduces cardiac dose during left-sided breast irradiation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility and variability of breath-hold level (BHL) using breath-hold curves and lateral kV setup images together. MATERIAL/METHOD A retrospective analysis of 30 left breast cancer patients treated using the v-DIBH technique in our department is performed. The BHL difference is measured from breath hold curves and lateral (LAT) kilo-Voltage (kV) setup images. The planning CT image and the selected treatment fraction data are collected. If the changes in BHL relate to the displacement of various bones in the kV setup, images are assessed. Furthermore, the maximum heart distance inside the treatment field is compared from LAT MV portal images. RESULTS The median and mean values of the BHL are nearly identical in different fractions (good reproducibility). However, the mean BHL values between planning and all measured fractions are statistically different; 16.3 vs. 20.8 mm for the planning and measured fractions (p < 0.001), which indicates that the variability of BHL is significantly different. CONCLUSION While reproducibility testing shows good agreement for inter-fractional breath-hold level, the variability between planning and fractions is relatively poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferihan Ertan
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Teachingand Research Hospital, 06200, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serdar Sahin
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Teachingand Research Hospital, 06200, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Can Azak
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Teachingand Research Hospital, 06200, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Karakaya
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Teachingand Research Hospital, 06200, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muzaffer Bedri Altundag
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Teachingand Research Hospital, 06200, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Goksel
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Teachingand Research Hospital, 06200, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cilla S, Romano C, Macchia G, Boccardi M, De Vivo LP, Morabito VE, Buwenge M, Strigari L, Indovina L, Valentini V, Deodato F, Morganti AG. Automated hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (HVMAT) for whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost to lumpectomy area : A treatment planning study. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:254-267. [PMID: 34767044 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01873-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an automated treatment planning approach for whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost using an automated hybrid VMAT class solution (HVMAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five consecutive patients with left breast cancer received 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to the whole breast and an additional simultaneous 10 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) to the tumor cavity. Ipsilateral lung, heart, and contralateral breast were contoured as main organs-at-risk. HVMAT plans were inversely optimized by combining two open fields with a VMAT semi-arc beam. Open fields were setup to include the whole breast with a 2 cm flash region and to carry 80% of beams weight. HVMAT plans were compared with three tangential techniques: conventional wedged-field tangential plans (SWF), field-in-field forward planned tangential plans (FiF), and hybrid-IMRT plans (HMRT). Dosimetric differences among the plans were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array. RESULTS No significant differences were found among the four techniques for both targets coverage. HVMAT plans showed consistently better PTVs dose contrast, conformity, and homogeneity (p < 0.001 for all metrics) and statistically significant reduction of high-dose breast irradiation. V55 and V60 decreased by 30.4, 26.1, and 20.8% (p < 0.05) and 12.3, 9.9, and 6.0% (p < 0.05) for SWF, FIF, and HMRT, respectively. Pretreatment dose verification reported a gamma pass-rate greater than the acceptance threshold of 95% for all HVMAT plans. In addition, HVMAT reduced the time for full planning optimization to about 20 min. CONCLUSIONS HVMAT plans resulted in superior target dose conformity and homogeneity compared to other tangential techniques. Due to fast planning time HVMAT can be applied for all patients, minimizing the impact on human or departmental resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Carmela Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mariangela Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Livia P De Vivo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vittoria E Morabito
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Indovina
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Figlia V, Simonetto C, Eidemüller M, Naccarato S, Sicignano G, De Simone A, Ruggieri R, Mazzola R, Matuschek C, Bölke E, Pazos M, Niyazi M, Belka C, Alongi F, Corradini S. Mammary Chain Irradiation in Left-Sided Breast Cancer: Can We Reduce the Risk of Secondary Cancer and Ischaemic Heart Disease with Modern Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques? Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:358-367. [PMID: 34602941 DOI: 10.1159/000509779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of the addition of internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation in node-positive left-sided breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) and comparatively evaluate excess relative and absolute risks of radiation-induced lung cancer/BC and ischaemic heart disease for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Methods Four treatment plans were created (3D-CRT and IMRT -/+ IMC) for each of the 10 evaluated patients, and estimates of excess relative risk (ERR) and 10-year excess absolute risk (EAR) were calculated for radiation-induced lung cancer/BC and coronary events using linear, linear-exponential and plateau models. Results The addition of IMC irradiation to RNI significantly increased the dose exposure of the heart, lung and contralateral breast using both techniques, increasing ERR for secondary lung cancer (58 vs. 44%, p = 0.002), contralateral BC (49 vs. 31%, p = 0.002) and ischaemic heart disease (41 vs. 27%, p = 0.002, IMRT plans). IMRT significantly reduced the mean cardiac dose and mean lung dose as compared to 3D-CRT, decreasing ERR for major coronary events (64% 3D-CRT vs. 41% IMRT, p = 0.002) and ERR for secondary lung cancer (75 vs. 58%, p = 0.004) in IMC irradiation, without a significant impact on secondary contralateral BC risks. Conclusion Although IMC irradiation has been shown to increase survival rates in node-positive BC patients, it increased dose exposure of organs at risk in left-sided BC, resulting in significantly increased risks for secondary lung cancer/contralateral BC and ischaemic heart disease. In this setting, the adoption of IMRT seems advantageous when compared to 3D-CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | | | - Markus Eidemüller
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefania Naccarato
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Gianluisa Sicignano
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Antonio De Simone
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Edwin Bölke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Macchia G, Pezzulla D, Cilla S, Boccardi M, Deodato F. New Technologies and Multidisciplinarity as Strategic Factors to Cope With Challenges in Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100777. [PMID: 34604608 PMCID: PMC8473665 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mariangela Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen M, Zang S, Yu H, Ning L, Huang H, Bu L, Ge J, Xu M, Tang Q, Zhao F, Yao G, Yan S. Immobilization-assisted abdominal deep inspiration breath-hold in post-mastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with internal mammary chain coverage. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:3314-3326. [PMID: 34249656 DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Whether to prophylactically irradiate the ipsilateral internal mammary chain (IMC) in post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) remains controversial because of equivocal clinical benefits against the added toxicities. Our previous study revealed that the cardiac dose was decreased during left-sided breast radiotherapy with abdominal deep inspiration breath-hold (aDIBH) as compared with free-breathing (FB) and thoracic deep inspiration breath-hold (tDIBH). Here we present the dosimetric advantage of aDIBH for patients undergoing PMRT with IMC coverage. Methods We prospectively analyzed 19 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent PMRT. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation under both free-breathing (FB) and aDIBH. The heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), lungs, and the contralateral breast was defined as organs at risk (OARs). Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), inverse planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were used to calculate the doses received by both the planning target volume (PTV) and OARs, which were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Compared with FB, the Dmean of the heart and LAD were respectively reduced by 3.5 Gy (P<0.003) and 8.9 Gy (P<0.001) in 3D-CRT, 2.6 Gy (P<0.001), and 7.8 Gy (P=0.001) in IMRT, 1.5 Gy (P<0.001) and 4.5 Gy (P=0.001) in VMAT plans under aDIBH. Among all these plans, the Dmean of the heart was lowest in aDIBH IMRT and 1.3 Gy lower than in aDIBH VMAT (P=0.002). aDIBH IMRT also resulted in a significantly reduced dose to the ipsilateral lung than plans under FB (P<0.05). Dmean and V5 to the contralateral lung and breast were higher in VMAT plans (P<0.05). Conclusions Using an immobilization-assisted aDIBH technique, radiation doses to the heart can be kept at reasonably low levels even if IMC is included in the clinical target volume (CTV). Among 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT plans, IMRT plus aDIBH results in the best heart-sparing effect. We recommend that the aDIBH technique be routinely applied in suitable patients if the IMC is irradiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiqin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou and Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jinhua, China
| | - Shoumei Zang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lihua Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huijie Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, YiLi Friendship Hospital, Yili, China
| | - Luyi Bu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mengyou Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiuying Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guorong Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Senxiang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Moturi S, Rao SNT, Vemuru S. Grey wolf assisted dragonfly-based weighted rule generation for predicting heart disease and breast cancer. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2021; 91:101936. [PMID: 34218121 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Disease prediction plays a significant role in the life of people, as predicting the threat of diseases is necessary for citizens to live life in a healthy manner. The current development of data mining schemes has offered several systems that concern on disease prediction. Even though the disease prediction system includes more advantages, there are still many challenges that might limit its realistic use, such as the efficiency of prediction and information protection. This paper intends to develop an improved disease prediction model, which includes three phases: Weighted Coalesce rule generation, Optimized feature extraction, and Classification. At first, Coalesce rule generation is carried out after data transformation that involves normalization and sequential labeling. Here, rule generation is done based on the weights (priority level) assigned for each attribute by the expert. The support of each rule is multiplied with the proposed weighted function, and the resultant weighted support is compared with the minimum support for selecting the rules. Further, the obtained rule is subject to the optimal feature selection process. The hybrid classifiers that merge Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Deep Belief Network (DBN) takes the role of classification, which characterizes whether the patient is affected with the disease or not. In fact, the optimized feature selection process depends on a new hybrid optimization algorithm by linking the Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) with Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) and hence, the presented model is termed as Grey Wolf Levy Updated-DA (GWU-DA). Here, the heart disease and breast cancer data are taken, where the efficiency of the proposed model is validated by comparing over the state-of-the-art models. From the analysis, the proposed GWU-DA model for accuracy is 65.98 %, 53.61 %, 42.27 %, 35.05 %, 34.02 %, 11.34 %, 13.4 %, 10.31 %, 9.28 % and 9.89 % better than CBA + CPAR, MKL + ANFIS, RF + EA, WCBA, IQR + KNN + PSO, NL-DA + SVM + DBN, AWFS-RA, HCS-RFRS, ADS-SM-DNN and OSSVM-HGSA models at 60th learning percentage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sireesha Moturi
- Research Scholar, Computer Science and Engineering, KLEF, Green Fields, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh, 522502, India.
| | - S N Tirumala Rao
- Professor, Computer Science and Engineering, Narasaraopeta Engineering College, Narasaraopet, Guntur(Dt), Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Srikanth Vemuru
- Professor, Computer Science and Engineering, KLEF, Green Fields, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh, 522502, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cilla S, Macchia G, Romano C, Morabito VE, Boccardi M, Picardi V, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Deodato F. Challenges in lung and heart avoidance for postmastectomy breast cancer radiotherapy: Is automated planning the answer? Med Dosim 2021; 46:295-303. [PMID: 33836910 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been shown to improve the overall survival for invasive breast cancer patients. However, it represents a challenging treatment geometry and individualized planning strategies with complex field arrangements are usually adopted to decrease radiotoxicity to heart and lungs. Automated treatment planning has the potential to improve plan quality consistency and planning efficiency. Herein, we describe the application of the Pinnacle3 Autoplanning engine as a valuable technological resource able to allow the treatment of challenging patients theoretically unfit for radiotherapy for major cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities. Treatment was planned for three left-sided chest wall and regional lymph-nodes postmastectomy breast cancer patients. A deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique was used aiming to reduce the OARs irradiation. Three manually generated plans (hybrid-IMRT (HMRT), hybrid-VMAT (HVMAT) and full VMAT (MP-VMAT) and a fully automated plan created by the Autoplanning engine (AP-VMAT) were optimized in order to ensure a safe radiation therapy to the patients. The plans were evaluated based on planning target volumes (PTVs) coverage, dose homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CN), dose to organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of pericarditis, long term mortality and pneumonitis. Despite the use of deep moderated breath-hold, all human-driven plans failed to reach the stringent dose objectives for OARs. All plans provided an optimal coverage for chest wall and lymph-nodal area. AP-VMAT delivered the lowest mean dose to the heart (3.4 to 4.9 Gy) and ipsilateral lung (7.5 to 12.5 Gy) reporting the lowest NTCP for pneumonitis (<1%), confirming the only chance to comply the dose objectives. Moreover, AP-VMAT reported a decrease of the integral dose, which was lower by about 4-8% with respect to manual plans. AP-VMAT plan resulted in up to 58% increase of MUs with respect to manual plans, suggesting a more pronounced fluence modulation and plan complexity. A major difference was found for the planning time which was reduced to less than 30 minutes by using the Auto-Planning module. With improved planning quality and efficiency, Auto-planning is an effective tool to enable high-quality plans in challenging postmastectomy breast cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Mariangela Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy; Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang X, Fargier-Bochaton O, Dipasquale G, Laouiti M, Kountouri M, Gorobets O, Nguyen NP, Miralbell R, Vinh-Hung V. Is prone free breathing better than supine deep inspiration breath-hold for left whole-breast radiotherapy? A dosimetric analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:317-331. [PMID: 33416915 PMCID: PMC7987627 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01731-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The advantage of prone setup compared with supine for left-breast radiotherapy is controversial. We evaluate the dosimetric gain of prone setup and aim to identify predictors of the gain. METHODS Left-sided breast cancer patients who had dual computed tomography (CT) planning in prone free breathing (FB) and supine deep inspiration breath-hold (DiBH) were retrospectively identified. Radiation doses to heart, lungs, breasts, and tumor bed were evaluated using the recently developed mean absolute dose deviation (MADD). MADD measures how widely the dose delivered to a structure deviates from a reference dose specified for the structure. A penalty score was computed for every treatment plan as a weighted sum of the MADDs normalized to the breast prescribed dose. Changes in penalty scores when switching from supine to prone were assessed by paired t-tests and by the number of patients with a reduction of the penalty score (i.e., gain). Robust linear regression and fractional polynomials were used to correlate patients' characteristics and their respective penalty scores. RESULTS Among 116 patients identified with dual CT planning, the prone setup, compared with supine, was associated with a dosimetric gain in 72 (62.1%, 95% CI: 52.6-70.9%). The most significant predictors of a gain with the prone setup were the breast depth prone/supine ratio (>1.6), breast depth difference (>31 mm), prone breast depth (>77 mm), and breast volume (>282 mL). CONCLUSION Prone compared with supine DiBH was associated with a dosimetric gain in 62.1% of our left-sided breast cancer patients. High pendulousness and moderately large breast predicted for the gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzhuo Wang
- Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, 300121 Tianjin, China
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Giovanna Dipasquale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Laouiti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Service de radio-oncologie, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Melpomeni Kountouri
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Raymond Miralbell
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Proton Therapy Centre, Quirónsalud, Madrid, Spain
- Institut Oncològic Teknon (IOT), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- CHU de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hafez A, Abdelaziz DM, Khalil MM, El-Nagdy MS. The necessity of using deep inspiration breath-hold in the radiotherapy of left breast cancer patients who undergo the UK FAST trial. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 7:015004. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/abc9f7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
: The purpose of the current study was to compare between deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) method in the setup reproducibility and to perform a dosimetric comparison between both methods in left-sided breast cancer patients who undergo the UK FAST trial.
Materials and methods
: The online matching correction data were retrospectively collected for 50 patients treated with the FAST trial. They were equally divided into DIBH and FB groups to compare between both methods in the setup reproducibility and create the appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margin. Ten patients out of the fifty were scanned in DIBH and FB to perform a dosimetric comparison with the strict acceptance criteria of the FAST trial.
Results
: All heart dosimetric parameters of the DIBH was significantly lower than that of FB (p < 0.001), and the lung V30% of DIBH plans was significantly lower than FB plans (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods in the other organs at risk doses. To fulfill the heart and lung constraints in FB plans, the PTV V90% was reduced by 3.4%, and three plans would not attain the PTV acceptance criteria. There was no significant difference between the systematic or random setup errors between both methods except the left-right random shift was significantly lower in DIBH cases (p = 0.004). The calculated PTV margins were (4 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm) for DIBH group, and (5 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm) for FB group in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and left-right shifts, respectively.
Conclusion
: It is highly warranted to treat left-sided breast cancer patients with the DIBH technique when the UK FAST trial is employed for treatment.
Collapse
|
27
|
Dolezel M, Odrazka K, Vanasek J, Hartmann I, Kohlova T, Vlachova Z. Audio-visual navigation reduces treatment time in deep-inspiration breath hold radiotherapy. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2020; 164:461-466. [DOI: 10.5507/bp.2019.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
28
|
Huang SF, Lin JC, Shiau AC, Chen YC, Li MH, Tsai JT, Liu WH. Optimal tumor coverage with different beam energies by IMRT, VMAT and TOMO: Effects on patients with proximal gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e23328. [PMID: 33217871 PMCID: PMC7676572 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
To compare the effects of different photon energies on radiation planning by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (TOMO) for proximal gastric cancer (PGC). Network analysis with microarray procession and gene ontology were used to identify the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on PGC. Then, we retrospectively analyzed 8 PGC patients after receiving irradiation with a prescribed dose of 50.4 Gy. The Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS, V9.8) was used to generate IMRT and VMAT plans by using 6 or 10 MV. TOMO plans were calculated on the Tomotherapy Planning Station Hi-Art Version 4.2.3 workstation (Tomotherapy Incorporated, Madison, WI, USA). PGC is associated with high DNA repair ability. TOMO plan results in higher tumor coverage and a better conformity index than IMRT and VMAT. 10-MV VMAT yields better dosimetric quality of the gradient index than 6-MV VMAT (P = .012). TOMO was associated with a lower irradiation dose in the mean dose to the right kidney (P = .049), left kidney and heart than 6-MV IMRT and 6-MV VMAT. 6-MV IMRT plan presented a higher dose of lung Dmean (P = .017) than 10-MV IMRT. Additionally, VMAT, using a planning energy of 6 MV, was associated with a significantly higher left kidney Dmean (P = .018) and V10 (P = .036) than a planning energy of 10 MV. TOMO is a better RT plan not only for tumor coverage but also for sparing organs at risk. IMRT and VMAT plans with 10 MV beams are more suitable than 6 MV beams for PGC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jang-Chun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University
| | - An-Cheng Shiau
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung
| | - Yun-Chih Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital
| | - Ming-Hsien Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital
| | - Jo-Ting Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University
| | - Wei-Hsiu Liu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chang KH, Chang JS, Park K, Chung SY, Kim SY, Park RH, Han MC, Kim J, Kim H, Lee H, Kim DW, Kim YB, Kim JS, Hong CS. A Retrospective Dosimetric Analysis of the New ESTRO-ACROP Target Volume Delineation Guidelines for Postmastectomy Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy After Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Front Oncol 2020; 10:578921. [PMID: 33194701 PMCID: PMC7606939 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.578921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The European Society of Radiation & Oncology and Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) presented new guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) delineation in post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR-i). This study evaluated the dosimetric characteristics, dosimetric accuracy, and delivery accuracy of these guidelines in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: This retrospective study included 15 patients with left breast cancer who underwent mastectomy with tissue expander placement followed by PMRT. An experienced radiation oncologist delineated the CTV twice on the same image datasets based on the ESTRO-ACROP (EA-TVD) and conventional target volume delineation (C-TVD) guidelines. All VMAT plans, which used a double partial arc, were generated using six MV photons. Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for organs at risk were compared. Dosimetric accuracy of the treatment plans and delivery accuracy were assessed. Results: Target volume of EA-TVD was significantly smaller than that of C-TVD. Although no statistically significant difference was noted in the target coverage between the two VMAT plans, EA-TVD VMAT significantly reduced the mean heart dose (3.99 ± 1.02 vs. 5.84 ± 1.78 Gy, p = 0.000), the maximum left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dose (9.43 ± 3.04 vs. 13.97 ± 6.04 Gy, p = 0.026), and the mean LAD dose (4.52 ± 1.31 vs. 6.35 ± 2.79 Gy, p = 0.028) compared with C-TVD VMAT. No significant difference was observed with respect to the total monitor units, plan complexity, and delivery quality assurance. Conclusions: This is the first study to show significant dose reduction for the normal heart and LAD tissue offered by the EA-TVD, while maintaining dosimetric and delivery accuracy, in PMRT after IBR-i in VMAT for left-sided breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Hwan Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwangwoo Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung Yeun Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Se Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ryeong Hwang Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hojin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chae-Seon Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated radiotherapy of breast cancer: a treatment planning study. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:296-307. [PMID: 33068126 PMCID: PMC7987622 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01696-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the best possible practice using hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for hypofractionated radiation therapy of breast cancer. Different combinations of H‑VMAT—a combination of three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and VMAT—were analyzed regarding planning target volume (PTV), dose coverage, and exposure to organs at risk (OAR). Methods Planning computed tomography scans were acquired in deep-inspiration breath-hold. A total of 520 treatment plans were calculated and evaluated for 40 patients, comprising six different H‑VMAT plans and a 3D-CRT plan as reference. H‑VMAT plans consisted of two treatment plans including 3D-CRT and VMAT. During H‑VMAT planning, the use of hard wedge filters (HWF) and beam energies were varied. The reference plans were planned with mixed beam energies and the inclusion/omission of HWF. Results Compared to the reference treatment plans, all H‑VMAT plans showed consistently better PTV dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity. Additionally, OAR protection was significantly improved with several H‑VMAT combinations (p < 0.05). The comparison of different H‑VMAT combinations showed that inclusion of HWF in the base plan had a negative impact on PTV dose coverage, conformity, and OAR exposure. It also increased the planned monitor units and beam-on time. Advantages of using lower beam energies (6-MV photons) in both the base plan and in the VMAT supplementary dose were observed. Conclusion The H‑VMAT technique is an effective possibility for generating homogenous and conformal dose distributions. With the right choice of H‑VMAT combination, superior OAR protection is achieved compared to 3D-CRT.
Collapse
|
31
|
Reckhow J, Kaidar-Person O, Ben-David MA, Ostrovski A, Ilinsky D, Goldstein J, Symon Z, Galper S. Continuous positive airway pressure with deep inspiration breath hold in left-sided breast radiation therapy. Med Dosim 2020; 46:127-131. [PMID: 33020023 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A dosimetric study to evaluate the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), with free-breathing (CPAP-FB) or with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH-CPAP) an adjunct and alternative to DIBH to reduce heart and lung dose in the radiation therapy (RT) of breast cancer planned for left side RT with regional nodes and internal mammary. A retrospective analysis of 10 left-sided breast cancer patients whose heart or lung dose constraints were not met after RT planning based on FB or DIBH simulations and were referred for CPAP-based planning. All patients were simulated using FB, DIBH, CPAP-FB, and CPAP-DIBH. Treatment plans were calculated to cover the breast/chest wall and regional nodes using tangential field-in-field technique (FiF). Dose-volume parameters for heart, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For all RT plans, mean heart dose (Gy) was lower for treatment plans with CPAP: CPAP-FB (mean 3.4 vs 7.4, p = 0.001) and CPAP-DIBH (mean 2.5 vs 7.4, p = 0.006) compared to FB alone. CPAP-DIBH also significantly reduced MHD as compared to DIBH alone (mean 2.5 vs 4.3 Gy, p = 0.013). CPAP-DIBH significantly reduced mean lung dose as compared to both FB (mean 14.4 vs 20.1, p = 0.005) and DIBH alone (mean 14.4 vs 17.4, p = 0.007). Eight of 10 patients did not meet ipsilateral lung V20Gy dose constraints (≥35% of lung receiving 20 Gy) in either the free breathing or DIBH plans, whereas 8 out of 10 met lung V20Gy goal constraints (≤30% of lung receiving 20 Gy) in the CPAP-DIBH plans. Based on the outcomes of our study, CPAP could be a strategy for reducing lung and heart dose, both in patients not able to execute DIBH and as an adjunct in those not deriving sufficient dose reduction from DIBH alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jensen Reckhow
- International Health at Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Anna Ostrovski
- Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Dina Ilinsky
- Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Zvi Symon
- Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Shira Galper
- Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Krug D, Baumann R, Krockenberger K, Vonthein R, Schreiber A, Boicev A, Würschmidt F, Weinstrauch E, Eilf K, Andreas P, Höller U, Dinges S, Piefel K, Zimmer J, Dellas K, Dunst J. Adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost after breast-conserving surgery: results of a prospective trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:48-55. [PMID: 33001241 PMCID: PMC7801347 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01689-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report results of a multicenter prospective single-arm phase II trial (ARO-2013-04, NCT01948726) of moderately accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS The eligibility criteria included unifocal breast cancer with an indication for adjuvant radiotherapy to the whole breast and boost radiotherapy to the tumor bed. The whole breast received a dose of 40 Gy and the tumor bed a total dose of 48 Gy in 16 fractions of 2.5 and 3 Gy, respectively. Radiotherapy could be given either as 3D conformal RT (3D-CRT) or as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The study was designed as a prospective single-arm trial to evaluate the acute toxicity of the treatment regimen. The study hypothesis was that the frequency of acute skin reaction grade ≥2 would be 20% or less. RESULTS From November 2013 through July 2014, 149 patients were recruited from 12 participating centers. Six patients were excluded, leaving 143 patients for analysis. Eighty-four patients (58.7%) were treated with 3D-CRT and 59 (41.3%) with IMRT. Adherence to the treatment protocol was high. The rate of grade ≥2 skin toxicity was 14.7% (95% confidence interval 9.8-21.4%). The most frequent grade 3 toxicity (11%) was hot flashes. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated low toxicity of and high treatment adherence to hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB in a multicenter prospective trial, although the primary hypothesis was not met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - René Baumann
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.,Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - Katja Krockenberger
- ZKS Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,AMEDOM GmbH, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schreiber
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Boicev
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany
| | | | - Evelyn Weinstrauch
- Praxis für Radioonkologie, Johanniter-Zentren für Medizinische Versorgung Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | | | - Peter Andreas
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie, Krankenhaus Buchholz, Buchholz in der Nordheide, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Dinges
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie & Radioonkologie, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Karen Piefel
- Strahlenzentrum Hamburg MVZ, Hamburg, Germany.,Fachbereich Strahlentherapie, Ambulanzzentrum des UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Zimmer
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kathrin Dellas
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Borm KJ, Simonetto C, Kundrát P, Eidemüller M, Oechsner M, Düsberg M, Combs SE. Toxicity of internal mammary irradiation in breast cancer. Are concerns still justified in times of modern treatment techniques? Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1201-1209. [PMID: 32619381 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1787509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to estimate the additional risk of side effects attributed to internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) as part of regional lymph node irradiation (RNI) in breast cancer patients and to compare it with estimated overall survival (OS) benefit from IMNI. MATERIAL AND METHODS Treatment plans (n = 80) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were calculated for 20 patients (4 plans per patient) with left-sided breast cancer from the prospective GATTUM trial in free breathing (FB) and in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). We assessed doses to organs at risk ((OARs) lung, contralateral breast and heart) during RNI with and without additional IMNI. Based on the OAR doses, the additional absolute risks of 10-year cardiac mortality, pneumonitis, and secondary lung and breast cancer were estimated using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and risk models assuming different age and risk levels. RESULTS IMNI notably increased the mean OAR doses. The mean heart dose increased upon IMNI by 0.2-3.4 Gy (median: 1.9 Gy) in FB and 0.0-1.5 Gy (median 0.4 Gy) in DIBH. However, the estimated absolute additional 10-year cardiac mortality caused by IMNI was <0.5% for all patients studied except 70-year-old high risk patients (0.2-2.4% in FB and 0.0-1.1% in DIBH). In comparison to this, the published oncological benefit of IMNI ranges between 3.3% and 4.7%. The estimated additional 10-year risk of secondary cancer of the lung or contralateral breast ranged from 0-1.5% and 0-2.8%, respectively, depending on age and risk levels. IMNI increased the pneumonitis risk in all groups (0-2.2%). CONCLUSION According to our analyses, the published oncological benefit of IMNI outweighs the estimated risk of cardiac mortality even in case of (e.g., cardiac) risk factors during VMAT. The estimated risk of secondary cancer or pneumonitis attributed to IMNI is low. DIBH reduces the estimated additional risk of IMNI even further and should be strongly considered especially in patients with a high baseline risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Joachim Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany
| | | | - Pavel Kundrát
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Markus Eidemüller
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany
| | - Mathias Düsberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung, (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Duffy S, Vulkan D, Cuckle H, Parmar D, Sheikh S, Smith R, Evans A, Blyuss O, Johns L, Ellis I, Sasieni P, Wale C, Myles J, Moss S. Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-24. [PMID: 33141657 PMCID: PMC7681269 DOI: 10.3310/hta24550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains disagreement on the long-term effect of mammographic screening in women aged 40-49 years. OBJECTIVES The long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial that offered annual mammography to women aged 40-49 years. The estimation of the effect of these mammograms on breast cancer and other-cause mortality, and the effect on incidence, with implications for overdiagnosis. DESIGN An individually randomised controlled trial comparing offering annual mammography with offering usual care in those aged 40-48 years, and thus evaluating the effect of annual screening entirely taking place before the age of 50 years. There was follow-up for an average of 23 years for breast cancer incidence, breast cancer death and death from other causes. We analysed the mortality and incidence data by Poisson regression and estimated overdiagnosis formally using Markov process models. SETTING Twenty-three screening units in England, Wales and Scotland within the NHS Breast Screening Programme. PARTICIPANTS Women aged 39-41 years were recruited between 1990 and 1997. After exclusions, a total of 53,883 women were randomised to undergo screening (the intervention group) and 106,953 women were randomised to have usual care (the control group). INTERVENTIONS The intervention group was invited to an annual breast screen with film mammography, two view at first screen and single view thereafter, up to and including the calendar year of their 48th birthday. The control group received no intervention. Both groups were invited to the National Programme from the age of 50 years, when screening is offered to all women in the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measures were mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase of the trial (i.e. before the first National Programme screen at 50 years), mortality from all breast cancers diagnosed after randomisation, all-cause mortality, mortality from causes other than breast cancer, and the incidence of breast cancer. RESULTS There was a statistically significant 25% reduction in mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase at 10 years' follow-up (relative rate 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97; p = 0.03). No reduction was observed thereafter (relative rate 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.22). Overall, there was a statistically non-significant 12% reduction (relative rate 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.03; p = 0.1). The absolute benefit remained approximately constant over time, at one death prevented per 1000 women screened. There was no effect of intervention on other-cause mortality (relative rate 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.07; p = 0.4). The intervention group had a higher incidence of breast cancer than the control group during the intervention phase of the trial, but incidence equalised immediately on the first National Programme screen at the age of 50-52 years. LIMITATIONS There was 31% average non-compliance with screening and three centres had to cease screening for resource and capacity reasons. CONCLUSIONS Annual mammographic screening at the age of 40-49 years resulted in a relative reduction in mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years. It is likely that digital mammography with two views at all screens, as practised now, could improve this further. There was no evidence of overdiagnosis in addition to that which already results from the National Programme carried out at later ages. FUTURE WORK There is a need for research on the effects of modern mammographic protocols and additional imaging in this age group. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24647151. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 55. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Other funding in the past has been received from the Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, the Department of Health and Social Care, the US National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Vulkan
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Howard Cuckle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dharmishta Parmar
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Shama Sheikh
- Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Smith
- Cancer Screening, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andrew Evans
- Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ian Ellis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter Sasieni
- Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Wale
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Myles
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sue Moss
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ashby O, Bridge P. Late effects arising from volumetric modulated arc therapy to the breast: A systematic review. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 27:650-653. [PMID: 32819824 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the breast offers the potential for excellent dose conformity with the possibility of integrating a simultaneous boost within the treatment plan. This technique, however, also delivers a low dose to a large amount of healthy tissue. This systematic review aimed to determine if VMAT offers a clinically significant difference in late effects compared with conformal radiotherapy techniques for breast radiotherapy. METHODS A systematic review and quality appraisal of primary studies evaluating VMAT to the breast was performed, adopting the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS A total of 8 studies were included in the review. These demonstrated variation in prescription, outcome measures and cohort characteristics. Findings supported the value of VMAT for reducing organ at risk (OAR) doses but also confirmed the potential secondary cancer risk arising from the low dose bath. Hybrid techniques combining VMAT with tangential intensity modulated or standard radiotherapy showed promise when tangential plans failed to meet objectives. CONCLUSION VMAT alone does not offer any significant benefit to late effects over conventional for breast radiotherapy due to the creation of a low dose bath, despite improving OAR doses. More research into hybrid techniques is warranted to identify the most appropriate treatment for different patient subgroups and tumour locations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE VMAT may not be the optimal technique for breast radiotherapy; hybrid plans combining tangential IMRT with VMAT are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Ashby
- School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - P Bridge
- School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, Swinnen A, Sauer TO, Bert C, Giantsoudi D, Corradini S, Batista V. Recent advanced in Surface Guided Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:187. [PMID: 32736570 PMCID: PMC7393906 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01629-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing acceptance and recognition of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) as a promising imaging technique has supported its recent spread in a large number of radiation oncology facilities. Although this technology is not new, many aspects of it have only recently been exploited. This review focuses on the latest SGRT developments, both in the field of general clinical applications and special techniques.SGRT has a wide range of applications, including patient positioning with real-time feedback, patient monitoring throughout the treatment fraction, and motion management (as beam-gating in free-breathing or deep-inspiration breath-hold). Special radiotherapy modalities such as accelerated partial breast irradiation, particle radiotherapy, and pediatrics are the most recent SGRT developments.The fact that SGRT is nowadays used at various body sites has resulted in the need to adapt SGRT workflows to each body site. Current SGRT applications range from traditional breast irradiation, to thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic tumor sites, and include intracranial localizations.Following the latest SGRT applications and their specifications/requirements, a stricter quality assurance program needs to be ensured. Recent publications highlight the need to adapt quality assurance to the radiotherapy equipment type, SGRT technology, anatomic treatment sites, and clinical workflows, which results in a complex and extensive set of tests.Moreover, this review gives an outlook on the leading research trends. In particular, the potential to use deformable surfaces as motion surrogates, to use SGRT to detect anatomical variations along the treatment course, and to help in the establishment of personalized patient treatment (optimized margins and motion management strategies) are increasingly important research topics. SGRT is also emerging in the field of patient safety and integrates measures to reduce common radiotherapeutic risk events (e.g. facial and treatment accessories recognition).This review covers the latest clinical practices of SGRT and provides an outlook on potential applications of this imaging technique. It is intended to provide guidance for new users during the implementation, while triggering experienced users to further explore SGRT applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M. Öllers
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A. Swinnen
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - T.-O. Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C. Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - D. Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V. Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim BH, Kim S, Kim YI, Chang JH, Hwang KT, Kim S, Cho MJ, Kwon J. Development of an Individualized Prediction Calculator for the Benefit of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients with Surgically Resected De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082103. [PMID: 32751136 PMCID: PMC7464221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Locoregional treatment has been increasingly adopted for metastatic breast cancer at presentation. This study aims to develop an individualized calculator to predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with surgically resected de novo stage IV breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer between 2010 and 2014. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 4473 patients were included in the analysis. Propensity score matching was used to balance the individual characteristics of the patients. After identifying the significant prognosticators, a nomogram was developed using multivariate regression models and internally validated. A web-based calculator was then constructed using a fitted survival prediction model. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 34 months, the three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 54.1% in the surgery alone group and 63.5% in the surgery + PORT group (p < 0.001). The survival benefit of PORT was maintained after propensity score matching (p < 0.001). Interaction testing of the prognostic variables found significant interactions between PORT and the presence of brain metastasis (p = 0.001), and between PORT and hormonal receptor expression (p = 0.018). After reviewing the performance of various models, a log-normal distributed survival model was adopted, with a C-index of 0.695. A calibration plot verified that the predicted survival rates were strongly correlated with the actual OS rates. A web-based survival calculator was constructed to provide individualized estimates of survival according to PORT. CONCLUSION PORT significantly improved OS rates, though the individual benefit was affected by a number of factors. We successfully developed a nomogram and web-based calculator that predicted the prognosis according to PORT in patients with surgically resected de novo stage IV breast cancer. These tools are expected to be useful in clinical practice and in the design of related trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byoung Hyuck Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea; (B.H.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Suzy Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea; (B.H.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Young Il Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Korea; (Y.I.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Ki-Tae Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea;
| | - Sup Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Korea; (Y.I.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Moon-June Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Korea; (Y.I.K.); (S.K.)
- Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
- Correspondence: (M.-J.C.); (J.K.); Tel.: +82-42-280-7861 (M.-J.C.); +82-42-280-7275 (J.K.); Fax: +82-42-280-7899 (M.-J.C.); +82-504-097-3573 (J.K.)
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Korea; (Y.I.K.); (S.K.)
- Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
- Correspondence: (M.-J.C.); (J.K.); Tel.: +82-42-280-7861 (M.-J.C.); +82-42-280-7275 (J.K.); Fax: +82-42-280-7899 (M.-J.C.); +82-504-097-3573 (J.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stewart D, Ambat J, Wallis S, Gurram M, Martin R. Breast Radiation Therapy Using a Breast Cup: Moving the Target, Not the Patient. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:e238-e243. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
39
|
Gaasch A, Schönecker S, Simonetto C, Eidemüller M, Pazos M, Reitz D, Rottler M, Freislederer P, Braun M, Würstlein R, Harbeck N, Niyazi M, Belka C, Corradini S. Heart sparing radiotherapy in breast cancer: the importance of baseline cardiac risks. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:117. [PMID: 32448164 PMCID: PMC7245801 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01520-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with left-sided breast cancer have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) after radiotherapy (RT). While the awareness of cardiac toxicity has increased enormously over the last decade, the role of individual baseline cardiac risks has not yet been systematically investigated. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of baseline CVD risks on radiation-induced cardiac toxicity. METHODS Two hundred ten patients with left-sided breast cancer treated in the prospective Save-Heart Study using a deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique were analysed regarding baseline risk factors for CVD. Three frequently used prediction tools (Procam, Framingham and Reynolds score) were applied to evaluate the individual CVD risk profiles. Moreover, 10-year CVD excess absolute risks (EAR) were estimated using the individual mean heart dose (MHD) of treatment plans in free breathing (FB) and DIBH. RESULTS The individual baseline CVD risk factors had a strong impact on the 10-year cumulative CVD risk. The mean baseline risks of the non-diabetic cohort (n = 200) ranged from 3.11 to 3.58%, depending on the risk estimation tool. A large number of the non-diabetic patients had a very low 10-year CVD baseline risk of ≤1%; nevertheless, 8-9% of patients reached ≥10% baseline 10-year CVD risk. In contrast, diabetic patients (n = 10) had significantly higher baseline CVD risks (range: 11.76-24.23%). The mean 10-year cumulative risk (Framingham score) following RT was 3.73% using the DIBH-technique (MHD:1.42Gy) and 3.94% in FB (MHD:2.33Gy), after adding a 10-year-EAR of + 0.34%(DIBH) and + 0.55%(FB) to the baseline risks, respectively. Smoking status was one of the most important and modifiable baseline risk factors. After DIBH-RT, the 182 non-smoking patients had a mean 10-year cumulative risk of 3.55% (3.20% baseline risk, 0.35% EAR) as compared to 6.07% (5.60% baseline risk, 0.47% EAR) for the 28 smokers. CONCLUSION In the present study, all CVD prediction tools showed comparable results and could easily be integrated into daily clinical practice. A systematic evaluation and screening helps to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from primary prevention. This could result in an even higher benefit than from heart-sparing irradiation techniques alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Gaasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Markus Eidemüller
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Reitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maya Rottler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Würstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Haussmann J, Corradini S, Nestle-Kraemling C, Bölke E, Njanang FJD, Tamaskovics B, Orth K, Ruckhaeberle E, Fehm T, Mohrmann S, Simiantonakis I, Budach W, Matuschek C. Recent advances in radiotherapy of breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:71. [PMID: 32228654 PMCID: PMC7106718 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01501-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Regional lymph node irradiation in younger trials seems to provide superior target coverage as well as a reduction in long-term toxicity resulting in a small benefit in the overall survival rate. For partial breast irradiation there are now two large trials available which support the role of partial breast irradiation in low risk breast cancer patients. Multiple randomized trials have established that a sequentially applied dose to the tumor bed improves local control with the cost of worse cosmetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Haussmann
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Nestle-Kraemling
- Department of Gynecologic and Obstetrics, Evanglisches Krankenhaus Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Edwin Bölke
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | | | - Bálint Tamaskovics
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Klaus Orth
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Eugen Ruckhaeberle
- Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Svjetlana Mohrmann
- Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Ioannis Simiantonakis
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lee MS, Liu DW, Hung SK, Yu CC, Chi CL, Chiou WY, Chen LC, Lin RI, Huang LW, Chew CH, Hsu FC, Chan MWY, Lin HY. Emerging Challenges of Radiation-Associated Cardiovascular Dysfunction (RACVD) in Modern Radiation Oncology: Clinical Practice, Bench Investigation, and Multidisciplinary Care. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020; 7:16. [PMID: 32154267 PMCID: PMC7047711 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial treatment modality in managing cancer patients. However, irradiation dose sprinkling to tumor-adjacent normal tissues is unavoidable, generating treatment toxicities, such as radiation-associated cardiovascular dysfunction (RACVD), particularly for those patients with combined therapies or pre-existing adverse features/comorbidities. Radiation oncologists implement several efforts to decrease heart dose for reducing the risk of RACVD. Even applying the deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique, the risk of RACVD is though reduced but still substantial. Besides, available clinical methods are limited for early detecting and managing RACVD. The present study reviewed emerging challenges of RACVD in modern radiation oncology, in terms of clinical practice, bench investigation, and multidisciplinary care. Several molecules are potential for serving as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Of these, miRNAs, endogenous small non-coding RNAs that function in regulating gene expression, are of particular interest because low-dose irradiation, i.e., 200 mGy (one-tenth of conventional RT daily dose) induces early changes of pro-RACVD miRNA expression. Moreover, several miRNAs, e.g., miR-15b and miR21, involve in the development of RACVD, further demonstrating the potential bio-application in RACVD. Remarkably, many RACVDs are late RT sequelae, characterizing highly irreversible and progressively worse. Thus, multidisciplinary care from oncologists and cardiologists is crucial. Combined managements with commodities control (such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes), smoking cessation, and close monitoring are recommended. Some agents show abilities for preventing and managing RACVD, such as statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs); however, their real roles should be confirmed by further prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon-Sing Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Dai-Wei Liu
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Kai Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Cancer Centre, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chia Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Lin Chi
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Anatomic Pathology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yen Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Cancer Centre, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Liang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Cancer Centre, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Ru-Inn Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Li-Wen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Cancer Centre, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hui Chew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Cancer Centre, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Feng-Chun Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan
| | - Michael W Y Chan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Hon-Yi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Cancer Centre, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Taiwan.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Krug D, Baumann R, Budach W, Duma MN, Dunst J, Feyer P, Fietkau R, Haase W, Harms W, Hehr T, Piroth MD, Sedlmayer F, Souchon R, Wenz F, Sauer R. Commercially Available Gene Expression Assays as Predictive Tools for Adjuvant Radiotherapy? A Critical Review. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:118-126. [PMID: 32398980 DOI: 10.1159/000505656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gene expression assays are increasingly used for decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. There are some clinical situations in which there is also a need for better prognostic and predictive markers to better estimate the amount of benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The rising availability of gene expression analyses prompts the question whether their results can also be used to guide clinical decisions regarding adjuvant radiation. Summary Multiple studies suggest a correlation between results from gene expression assays and locoregional recurrence rates. Only few publications addressed the predictive value of results from gene expression analysis for the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in different settings. Key Messages To date, the available evidence on the possible predictive value of gene expression assays for radiotherapy does not support their inclusion into the decision-making process for adjuvant radiation. This is due to methodological weaknesses and limitations regarding patient selection, the nonrandomized design of all studies in terms of radiotherapy use, and limited availability of tissue from prospective trials. Thus, utilization of the present knowledge for clinical indication of radiotherapy should be very cautious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - René Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | - Wulf Haase
- St.-Vincentius-Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hehr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Marc D Piroth
- HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rolf Sauer
- University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tanaka O, Ono K, Taniguchi T, Makita C, Matsuo M. Dosimetric evaluation of the heart and left anterior descending artery dose in radiotherapy for Japanese patients with breast cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:134-139. [PMID: 31840754 PMCID: PMC6976815 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been used for breast cancer as well as in field-in-field techniques. Few dosimetric comparison studies have been conducted using IMRT and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for Japanese patients. We aimed to study such patients. Thirty-two patients with left-sided breast cancer were enrolled. We conducted the following five treatment plans: two field-static IMRT (2F-S-IMRT), four field-static IMRT (4F-S-IMRT), 40° dual partial arc VMAT (40d-VMAT), 80° dual partial arc VMAT (80d-VMAT) and 210° partial VMAT (210p-VMAT). We evaluated the following: level of coverage of planning target volume (PTV) of 95% for irradiation at a dose of 50 Gy (D95) and the percentage of the heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) volume that received 10 Gy or more (V10). As a result, the coverage of 40d-VMAT for the prescribed PTV dose of D95 was significantly lower than that of the other treatment plans (P < 0.05). Regarding heart V10 and LAD V10, 2F-S-IMRT, 40d-VMAT and 80d-VMAT showed significantly lower dose than the other treatment plans (P < 0.05). In conclusion, among the five plans, 2F-S-IMRT is recommended for Japanese patients because of high coverage of D95 of PTV, low V10 of the heart and LAD and the monitor unit value was the lowest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Tanaka
- Asahi University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kousei Ono
- Asahi University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuya Taniguchi
- Asahi University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu, Japan
| | - Chiyoko Makita
- Gifu University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masayuki Matsuo
- Gifu University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yan SX, Maisonet OG, Perez CA, Huppert N, Hitchen CJ, Das IJ, Gerber NK. Radiation effect on late cardiopulmonary toxicity: An analysis comparing supine DIBH versus prone techniques for breast treatment. Breast J 2020; 26:897-903. [PMID: 31912595 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Two commonly used whole breast irradiation (WBI) techniques, deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and prone positioning, are compared with regard to dosimetry and estimated late cardiac morbidity and secondary lung cancer mortality using published models. Forty patients with left-sided DCIS or breast cancer who underwent lumpectomy and required adjuvant WBI were enrolled on a prospective trial comparing supine DIBH (S-DIBH) with prone free breathing (P-FB) planning. Patients underwent CT simulation in both positions; two plans were generated for each patient. Comparative dosimetry was available for 34 patients. Mean cardiac and lung doses were calculated. Risk of death from ischemic heart disease (IHD), risk of at least one acute coronary event (ACE), and lung cancer mortality were estimated from published data. Difference between S-DIBH and P-FB plans was compared using paired two-tailed t test. Estimated mean risk of death from IHD by age 80 was 0.1% (range 0.0%-0.2%) for both plans (P = 1.0). Mean risk of at least one ACE was 0.3% (range 0.1%-0.6%) for both plans (P = .6). Mean lung cancer mortality risk was 1.4% (range 0.5%-15.4%) for S-DIBH and 1.0% (range 0.4%-9.8%) for P-FB (P = .008). Excess lung cancer mortality due to radiation was 0.5% (range 0.1%-6.0%) with S-DIBH and 0.0% (range 0.0%-0.4%) with P-FB (P = .008). Both S-DIBH and P-FB provide excellent cardiac sparing. Prone positioning results in lower lung dose than S-DIBH and leads to an absolute decrease of 0.5% in excess lung cancer mortality for patients receiving WBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry X Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivier G Maisonet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carmen A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nelly Huppert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine J Hitchen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Naamit K Gerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Karpf D, Sakka M, Metzger M, Grabenbauer GG. Left breast irradiation with tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) versus tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT): trade-offs between secondary cancer induction risk and optimal target coverage. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:156. [PMID: 31477165 PMCID: PMC6721379 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1363-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard treatment after breast-conserving surgery. According to meta-analyses, adjuvant 3d-conventional irradiation reduces the risk of local recurrence and thereby improves long-term survival by 5–10%. However, there is an unintended exposure of organs such as the heart, lungs and contralateral breast. Irradiation of the left breast has been related to long-term effects like increased rates of coronary events as well as second cancer induction. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) and tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT) and particularly deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique have been developed in order to improve coverage of target volume and to reduce dose to normal tissue. The aim of this study was to compare t-IMRT-plans with t-VMAT-plans in DIBH position for left-sided breast irradiation in terms of normal tissue exposure, i.e. of lungs, heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA), as well as homogeneity (HI) and conformity index (CI) and excess absolute risk (EAR) for second cancer induction for organs at risk (OAR) after irradiation. Methods Twenty patients, diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer and treated with breast-preserving surgery, were included in this planning study. For each patient DIBH-t-IMRT plan using 5 to 7 beams and t-VMAT plan using four rotations were generated to achieve 95% dose coverage to 95% of the volume. Data were evaluated on the basis of dose-volume histograms: Cardiac dose and LADCA (mean and maximum dose, D25% and D45%), dose to ipsilateral and contralateral lung (mean, D20%, D30%), dose to contralateral breast (mean dose), total monitor units, V5% of total body and normal tissue integral dose (NTID). In addition, homogeneity index and conformity index, as well as the excess absolute risk (EAR) to estimate the risk of second malignancy were calculated. Results T-IMRT showed a significant reduction in mean cardiac dose of 26% (p = 0.002) compared to t-VMAT, as well as a significant reduction in the mean dose to LADCA of 20% (p = 0.03). Following t-IMRT, mean dose to the left lung was increased by 5% (p = 0.006), whereas no significant difference was found in the mean dose to the right lung and contralateral breast between the two procedures. Monitor units were 31% (p = 0.000004) lower for t-IMRT than for t-VMAT. T-IMRT technique significantly reduced normal tissue integral dose (NTID) by 19% (p = 0.000005) and the V5% of total body by 24% (p = 0.0007). In contrast, t-VMAT improved CI and HI by 2% (p = 0.001) and 0.4% (p = 0.00001), respectively. EAR with t-IMRT was significantly lower, especially for contralateral lung and contralateral breast (2–5/10,000 person years) but not for ipsilateral lung. Conclusion Compared to t-VMAT, t-IMRT in left-sided breast irradiation significantly reduced dose to organs at risk as well as normal tissue integral dose, and V5% total body. EAR with t-IMRT was significantly lower for contralateral lung and contralateral breast. T-VMAT, however, achieved better homogeneity and conformity. This may be relevant in individual cases where sufficient coverage of medial lymphatic target volumes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Karpf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Coburg Cancer Center, Coburg, Germany.,Medical Faculty of the Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mazen Sakka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Coburg Cancer Center, Coburg, Germany
| | - Martin Metzger
- Division of Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Coburg Cancer Center, Coburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard G Grabenbauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Coburg Cancer Center, Coburg, Germany. .,Medical Faculty of the Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim BH, Ko BK, Bae JW, Nam S, Park MH, Jeong J, Lee HJ, Chang JH, Kim S, Hwang KT. Survival benefit of postoperative radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery: a Korean population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 178:105-113. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05372-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
47
|
Corradini S, Krug D, Meattini I, Fastner G, Matuschek C, Cutuli B. Challenges in Radiotherapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:152-158. [PMID: 31316313 DOI: 10.1159/000500847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Hörner-Rieber J, Lagerwaard FJ, Mazzola R, Palacios MA, Philippens MEP, Raaijmakers CPJ, Terhaard CHJ, Valentini V, Niyazi M. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:92. [PMID: 31167658 PMCID: PMC6551911 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 229] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) marks the beginning of a new era. MR is a versatile and suitable imaging modality for radiotherapy, as it enables direct visualization of the tumor and the surrounding organs at risk. Moreover, MRgRT provides real-time imaging to characterize and eventually track anatomical motion. Nevertheless, the successful translation of new technologies into clinical practice remains challenging. To date, the initial availability of next-generation hybrid MR-linac (MRL) systems is still limited and therefore, the focus of the present preview was on the initial applicability in current clinical practice and on future perspectives of this new technology for different treatment sites.MRgRT can be considered a groundbreaking new technology that is capable of creating new perspectives towards an individualized, patient-oriented planning and treatment approach, especially due to the ability to use daily online adaptation strategies. Furthermore, MRL systems overcome the limitations of conventional image-guided radiotherapy, especially in soft tissue, where target and organs at risk need accurate definition. Nevertheless, some concerns remain regarding the additional time needed to re-optimize dose distributions online, the reliability of the gating and tracking procedures and the interpretation of functional MR imaging markers and their potential changes during the course of treatment. Due to its continuous technological improvement and rapid clinical large-scale application in several anatomical settings, further studies may confirm the potential disruptive role of MRgRT in the evolving oncological environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - F. Alongi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C. Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - L. Boldrini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - F. Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Mazzola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M. A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. E. P. Philippens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. P. J. Raaijmakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V. Valentini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - M. Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Musa AE, Shabeeb D. Radiation-Induced Heart Diseases: Protective Effects of Natural Products. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2019; 55:E126. [PMID: 31075882 PMCID: PMC6572037 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55050126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) account for the majority of deaths worldwide. Radiation-induced heart diseases (RIHD) is one of the side effects following exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). Exposure could be from various forms such as diagnostic imaging, radiotherapy for cancer treatment, as well as nuclear disasters and nuclear accidents. RIHD is mostly observed after radiotherapy for thoracic malignancies, especially left breast cancer. RIHD may affect the supply of blood to heart muscles, leading to an increase in the risk of heart attacks to irradiated persons. Due to its dose-limiting consequence, RIHD has a negative effect on the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy. Several methods have been proposed for protection against RIHD. In this paper, we review the use of natural products, which have shown promising results for protection against RIHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eleojo Musa
- Department of Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), International Campus, Tehran 1416753955, Iran.
- Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, TUMS, Tehran 1416753955, Iran.
| | - Dheyauldeen Shabeeb
- Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Misan, Misan 62010, Iraq.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yao S, Zhang Y, Nie K, Liu B, Haffty BG, Ohri N, Yue NJ. Setup uncertainties and the optimal imaging schedule in the prone position whole breast radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:76. [PMID: 31072388 PMCID: PMC6509791 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1282-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the setup uncertainties and to establish an optimal imaging schedule for the prone-positioned whole breast radiotherapy. Methods Twenty prone-positioned breast patients treated with tangential fields from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The prescription dose for the whole breast treatment was 266 cGy × 16 for all of the patients and the treatments were delivered with the SSD setup technique. At every fraction of treatment, patient was firstly set up based on the body localization tattoos. MV portal imaging was then taken to confirm the setup; if discrepancy (> 3 mm) was found between the portal images and corresponding plan images, the patient positioning was adjusted accordingly with couch movement. Based on the information acquired from the daily tattoo and portal imaging setup, three sets of data, named as weekly imaging guidance (WIG), no daily imaging guidance (NIG), and initial 3 days then weekly imaging guidance (3 + WIG) were sampled, constructed, and analyzed in reference to the benchmark of the daily imaging guidance (DIG). We compared the setup uncertainties, target coverage (D95, Dmax), V5 of the ipsilateral lung, the mean dose of heart, the mean and max dose of the left-anterior-descending coronary artery (LAD) among the 4 imaging guidance (IG) schedules. Results Relative to the daily imaging guidance (IG) benchmark, the NIG schedule led to the largest residual setup uncertainties; the uncertainties were similar for the WIG and 3 + WIG schedules. Little variations were observed for D95 of the target among NIG, DIG and WIG. The target Dmax also exhibited little changes among all the IG schedules. While V5 of the ipsilateral lung changed very little among all 4 schedules, the percent change of the mean heart dose was more pronounced; but its absolute values were still within the tolerance. However, for the left-sided breast patients, the LAD dose could be significantly impacted by the imaging schedules and could potentially exceed its tolerance criteria in some patients if NIG, WIG and 3 + WIG schedules were used. Conclusions For left-side whole breast treatment in the prone position using the SSD treatment technique, the daily imaging guidance can ensure dosimetric coverage of the target as well as preventing critical organs, especially LAD, from receiving unacceptable levels of dose. For right-sided whole breast treatment in the prone position, the weekly imaging setup guidance appears to be the optimal choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengyu Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ke Nie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ning J Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
| |
Collapse
|